FINAL Fluid Friction Lab
FINAL Fluid Friction Lab
FINAL Fluid Friction Lab
DIAGRAM:
PROCEDURE:
1. Set up equipment by first checking to see if there is a sufficient water supply to pump.
2. Open/close valves on the system to ensure that flow is only through one line.
RESULTS:
Valve Volume Time in Flow Pipe Pipe area Velocity Velocity Head Head Resistance
Opening (Litres) second rate, Q Dia. in in m2 in m/s head in Loss Loss coefficient
(%) =T in m3/s m =A v=Q/A mH2O in in K=
=Q =D =v = v2/2g mHg mH2O hL/(v2/2g)
hL= hL= h1-
h1-h2 h2
100 5 26.97 0.000185 0.018 0.000254 0.727 0.0269 0.060 0.816 30.33
75 5 27.47 0.000182 0.018 0.000254 0.717 0.0262 0.059 0.816 31.15
50 5 27.82 0.000180 0.018 0.000254 0.709 0.0256 0.060 0.802 31.33
25 5 28.06 0.000178 0.018 0.000254 0.701 0.0250 0.056 0.762 30.48
CALCULATIONS:
2. From diameter of pipe containing valve or fitting (measure diameter using vernier
calipers), find flow area, A =0.000254 m2
πd 2
Sol’n: Flow Area, A = [Diameter of pipe given as 18mm.]
4
= (π x 0.0182)/4
A = 0.000254 m2
3. Calculate velocity &velocity head. v =Q/A, v= 0.727 m/s.
Sol’n: Velocity, V = Q/A
0.000185
=
0.000254
V = 0.727 ms-1
5. Repeat above for one or two more flow rates and calculate K values again.
K2 = 31.15
K3 = 31.33
Hl
6. Calculate the friction factor, f from 𝑓 = L v 2
D 2g
Sol’n: [Using 1m of pipe and a long elbow fitting]
Hl
Friction Factor, f = L v 2
D 2g
0.816
= 1.288 0.7272
0.018 2 x 9.81
f = 0.423
7. Repeat above for one or two more flow rates and calculate f values again.
f2 = 0.435
f3 = 0.437
[N.B. SEE DISCUSSION for an explanation of consistency/inconsistency of results.]
DISCUSSION:
The aim of this experiment was to determine the resistance coefficient, K (from head loss, h)
and determine the friction factor, f (from head loss, hL) for a length of pipe. In this
experiment, the volume of water to be filled was left constant, at 5 Litres. The pipe length,
pipe diameter and area were also constants, measuring 1 m, 0.018 m and 0.000254 m2
respectively. After bleeding all lines, the line was opened so that water could flow through
and fill the container to 5 litres. At each valve opening, the timer was started at the “0L mark”
and subsequently stopped at the “5L mark.” The time taken for each valve opening was
recorded in a suitable table. Furthermore, the upstream and downstream pressure values were
read-off and recorded from the mercury manometer. These raw values were used for the
calculations.
In order to calculate K and f, the volumetric flow rate, flow area, flow velocity and velocity
head were calculated, as outlined previously. In carrying out the calculations, all raw values
were adjusted to their standard units, to ensure uniformity. The values for relevant parameters
were calculated based on four (4) valve opening increments: 100%, 75%, 50% and 25%.
The three calculated values of K and f were based on the 100%, 75% and 50% valve
openings. The three calculated values of K were 30.33, 31.15 and 31.33. The three calculated
values of f were 0.423, 0.435 and 0.437. These values are reasonably consistent. However,
the slight inconsistencies may have been caused by parallax error, human error and
equipment error. To elaborate, readings may not have been taken at eye-level, the timer may
not have been started/stopped precisely due to human reaction-time and the equipment used
may have been faulty, bearing leaks, improper calibration or gas bubbles within the pipes.
CONCLUSION:
The average values for the resistance coefficient, K and the friction factor, f were found to be
30.94 and 0.432 respectively.
REFERENCES:
PEOP1009 – FLUID FRICTION LAB – 5% Lab Script
(DEPARTMENT OF PROCESS ENGINEERING of the UNIVERSITY OF
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO)
ORIGINAL LAB SCRIPT WITH RESULTS: