Midterm Page 1 of 42
General Education
                                                   Academic Year 2021-2022,
                                                               2nd Semester
                                   ETHICS
                                           GE 08
                                                    Qayser D. Siblante
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                       Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                           Midterm Page 2 of 42
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                           Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                                 Midterm Page 3 of 42
                                 Cultural Relativism
                                           Module 7
     OVERVIEW
         after studying the meaning of culture, how it is learned and how it
     shapes moral behavior, let us focus on cultural relativism, its meaning and its
     strengths and weaknesses.
         LEARNING
     its strengths        OUTCOMES
                   and weaknesses.
     By the end of this module, you should be able to:
                Explain cultural relativism.
                Cite the strengths and weaknesses of cultural relativism.
    LEARNING EXPERIENCES & SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES (SAA
     Activity
                 1.   Read this statement: “what is true for me is true for me, and what
                      is true for you is true for you.” Do you agree with this statement?
                      Those who say NO, they don’t agree, form one group. and those
                      who say YES, they agree form another group.
                 2.   YES, group and NO group engage in a debate. Whoever is
                      convinced
                      Should transfer to the group. Example, at first you are a YES but
                      after listening to the NO group, you are convinced and so you join
                      the No group.
     Analysis
                 Is there any danger posed by this thought: “What is true for me is true
                 for me, and what is true for you is true tor you”?
     Abstraction
              What is cultural relativism? First, relativism says “what is true or for
     you is true for you, and what is true for me is true for me”. Analogously,
     cultural relativism would say, "what you believe, value or practice depends on
     your culture while what I believe, value and practice, depends on my culture
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                 Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
                College of Teacher Education
                                                              Midterm Page 4 of 42
     while I beliefs, value, or practice, should be understood based on that based
     person’s own culture, rather than be judged against the criteria of another.”
     Stated in another way:
     Cultural relativism is the view that moral or ethical systems, which vary from
     culture to culture, are all equally valid and no one system is really “better”
     than any other. This is based on the idea that there is no ultimate standard of
     good and evil, so every Judgement about right and wrong is a product of
     society. Therefore, any opinion on morality or ethics is subject to the cultural
     perspective of each person. Ultimately, this means that no moral or ethical
     system can be considered the “best” or “worst” and no particular moral or
     ethical position can actually be considered “right” or “wrong”
     (https:/www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-relativism.htm)
               In the context of cultural relativism, the manner by which the African
     woman is treated in comparison to the African man should not be judged against
     other culture’s standards, This should be judged in the context of African
     culture, not in the context of Christian culture.
     Cultural Relativism vs Cultural Perspective
               However, what the cultural relativist fails to see is the difference
     between cultural perspective and cultural relativism. A perspective is a
     standpoint or view point of something. For instance, there are as many
     perspectives of a building, a house, as there are standpoints. You try to
     appreciate the design of house considering its various perspective, but you never
     judge the design based on only one perspective. Trying to understand one’s
     culture having perspective of one's culture, is needed to understand people. but it
     does not follow that morality must be based only on said culture:
               …. the problem with moving from cultural perspective to cultural
     relativism is the erosion of reason at causes Rather than simply saying, "we
     need to understand the morals of other cultures,” “it Says we cannot judge the
     morals of other cultures,” regardless of the reasons for their actions. There is
     no longer any perspective, and it becomes literally impossible to argue that
     anything a culture does it right or wrong. If we hold on to strict cultural
     relativism, it is not
     possible to say that human sacrifice is “wrong” Or that respect for the elderly
     is "right.”. After all, those are products of the culture. This takes any talk of
     morality right over the cliff, and into meaningless gibberish. (Mckinno1, et al.,
     2015)
              Likewise, logical analysis or cultural relativism yields contradictory
     implications:
              Relativism in general breaks down when examined from a purely
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                               Midterm Page 5 of 42
     logical perspective. The basic premise is that "truth is relative.” If every truth
     statement is valid, then the statement "some truths are absolute must be valid.
     The statement "there are no absolute truths" is accurate, according to
     relativism--but it is an absolute truth itself.
     These contradict the very concept of relativism, meaning that absolute relativism
     meaning that absolute relativism is self-contradictory and impossible.
     Stated in another way:
               Tolerance is certainly a virtue... If morality is simply relative to each
     culture then if the culture does not have a principle of tolerance, its members
     have no obligation to be tolerant... from a relativistic point of view, There is no
     more reason to be tolerant than to be intolerant and neither stance is objectively
     morally better than the other.
               If valid criticism supposes an objective or impartial standard,
     relativists cannot morally criticize anyone outside their own culture. Adolf
     Hitler’s genocidal actions, so long as they are culturally accepted, are as
     morally legitimate as Mother Teresa’s works of mercy. If Conventional
     Relativism is accepted, racism, genocide of unpopular minorities, oppression of
     the poor slavery and even the advocacy of war for its own sake are as equally
     moral as their opposites. And if a subculture decided that starting a nuclear war
     was somehow morally acceptable, we could not morally criticize these people.
     (Mackinnon, et al., 2015)
     Application
         1.    Is cultural perspective the same as cultural relativism?
         2.    Illustrate with an example cultural perspective and cultural relativism.
        KEY POINTS
              Cultural relativism is "the idea that a person's beliefs, values and
               practices e understood based on that person’s own culture, rather than
               be judged against the criteria of another.”
              Morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an
               action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in
               which it practiced. what is good depends on what society's culture
               considers as good. What is bad likewise depends on what society's
               culture considers as bad.
               Absolute relativism is self contradictory and impossible.
               Absolute relativism states "there are no absolute truths: which is
               an absolute truth itself, so absolute relativism contradicis itself.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
              College of Teacher Education
                                                            Midterm Page 6 of 42
          There is a diference between cultural perspective and cultural
           relativism. To have a cultural perspective is to understand
           people's beliefs, values and practices in the context of their
           culture. Having a perspective of one's culture, is needed to
           understand people. But it does not follow that morality must be
           based on said culture.
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT
         Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts
     outlined above, it is now time for an assessment to see how far you have
     improved. On every module’s “End of Module Assessment” (this part),
     write your answer/s on a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
    LOOKING AHEAD
         Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! The next
     topic will deal on The Filipino Character! Happy learning!
     REFERENCES
          Etgics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B. Corpuz,
          BSE, MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston Street, Brgy.
          Kaunlaran, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                            Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                            Midterm Page 7 of 42
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT (Answer Sheet)
     (Please do not forget to provide information on this part)
     Name: _______________________               Course& Year: _____________
     Module Number and Title: ________           Date accomplished: _________
     Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it
     is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Write your
     answers on a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
     Task 1. Check your Understanding
                  1.   Explain cultural relativism.
                  2.   How does cultural relativism differ from cultural perspective?
                  3.   What is a strength of cultural relativism? What is a weakness
                       of cultural relativism?
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                            Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                                  Midterm Page 8 of 42
                              The Filipino Character
                                           Module 8
     OVERVIEW
              After having learned that culture influences the human person as a
     moral agent of and after having understood the meaning of Culture Relativism
     let us now examine the Filipino character to determine which one does not help
     him/her grow in moral character.
        LEARNING OUTCOMES
     By the end of this module, you should be able to:
               analyze crucial qualities of the Filipino moral identify.
               Evaluate elements of the Filipino character.
    LEARNING EXPERIENCES & SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES (SAA
     Activity
                Identify at least 3 strengths of the Filipino character.
     Analysis
             These strengths sometimes also become weaknesses. Do you
             agree?
             Explain your answer and illustrate with an example.
     Abstraction
             The Filipino Character: Strengths and Weaknesses
              Below is an excerpt of the Report "A Moral Recovery Program:
     Building a People, Building a Nation” submitted on April 27, 1988 by the Task
     Force to President Corazon Aquino, the Senate and the members of the press by
     then Senator Leticia Shahani, the moving spirit behind the program.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                  Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                         Midterm Page 9 of 42
              The weaknesses of the Filipino character as cited in the Report
     are as follows:
      1. Extreme family centeredness - Excessive concern for family
         means using one’s office and power to promote family interests and
         thus factionalism patronage, political dynasties and the protection of
         erring family members. It results in lack of concern for the
         Common good, and acts as a block to national consciousness.
      2. Extreme personalism -"Takes things personally cannot separate
         objective task from emotional involvement. Because of this the
         Filipino is uncomfortable with bureaucracy with rules and
         regulations and with standard procedures. He uses personal contacts
         and gives preference to family and friends in hiring services and
         even voting. Extreme personalism leads to the graft and corruption
         evident in Philippine society.
      3. Lack of discipline - A casual attitude toward time and space,
         manifested in lack of precision and compulsiveness, in poor time
         management and procrastination. Aversion to following procedure
         strictly results in lack of standardization and quality control.
         Impatience results in short cuts, palusot, ningas cogon lack of
         discipline often results in inefficient work systems, the violation of
         rules and a casual work ethic lacking follow through.
      4. Passivity and tack of initiative - Waiting to be told what to do,
         reliance on others (leaders and government), complacence, lack of
         sense of urgency. There is high tolerance for inefficiency, poor
         service, and even violation of one’s basic rights. To patient and
         matiisin, too easily resigned to his fate, the Filipino is easily
         oppressed and expioited.
      5. Colonial mentality - Lack of patriotism, or of an active awareness,
         Appreciation and love of the Philippines and an actual preference
         for things foreign.
      6. Kanya-kanya syndrome, talangka mentality - Done by tsismis,
         intriga, unconstructive criticism… it is evident in the personal
         ambition that is completely insensitive to the common good, e.g. the
         lack of a sense of service among people in the government
         bureaucracy. This result in the dampening of cooperative and the
         dampening of cooperative and community spirit and in the
         trampling upon other’s rights.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                         Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                         Midterm Page 10 of 42
      7. Lack of analysis and self-reflection - The tendency to be
         superficial and somewhat flighty. In the face of serious personal and
         social problems, there is lack of analysis or reflection and instead
         satisfaction with superficial explanations and. solutions.
      8. Emphasis on porma rather than substance – This lack of analysis
         and emphasis on form is reinforced by an educational system that is
         more form than substance…
           These weaknesses are rooted in many factors: home, social and
     economic environment; culture and language; history; religion;
     educational system; mass media; leadership and role models. Change is
     possible, however, and the following goals are proposed to develop in
     the Filipino: (1) a sense of patriotism and national pride; (2) a sense of
     the common good; (3) a sense of integrity and accountability, (4) the
     values and habits of discipline and hard work; (5) the value and habits of
     self-reflection and analysis; the internalization of spiritual values and the
     emphasis on essence rather than on form. (Shahani, Leticia. (1988). A
     Moral Recovery Program: Building a People: Building a People,
     Building a Nation.
              In the same report in 1988, Senator Leticia Shahani said, The
     strengths of the Filipino character are: 1) pakikipagkapwa-tao, 2) Family
     orientation, 3) joy and humor, 4) flexibility, adaptability and creativity,
     5) hard work and industry, 6) faith and religiosity and 7) ability to
     survive.
             There is so much good in the Filipino but so much needs to be
     changed, too. Many of our strengths as a people are also sources of our
     weaknesses. Shahani's report explains that "family orientation becomes
     in-group orientation that prevents us from reaching out beyond the
     family to the large community and the nation." For the Filipino, charity
     begins at home and at the same time ends there.
     Values Education in Schools
               Senator Shahani's Report was given in 1988. But its findings as
     reported may still be true today. If the Department of Education has to be
     true to its vision to help develop... "Filipinos who passionately love their
     country and whose values and competencies enable them to realize their
     full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the nation" and to
     its core values - maka-Diyos, maka-tao, makakalikasan and makabansa -
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                           Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                          Midterm Page 11 of 42
     it is an uphill battle for Philippine schools to realize these considering the
     weaknesses of the Filipino character: 1)extreme family centeredness, 2)
     extreme personalism, 3) lack of discipline,
     4) passivity and lack of initiative, 5) colonial mentality, 6) kanya-kanya
     syndrome, talangka mentality, 7) lack of self-analysis and self-reflection
     and 8) emphasis on porma rather than substance.
             So that it will not be "more form than substance" as described in
     Senator Shahani's Report, Philippine schools have to intensify values
     education in the curriculum which in essence is moral education. Inm
              So that it will not be "more form than substance" as described in
     Senator Shahani's Report, Philippine schools have to intensify values
     education in the curriculum which in essence is moral education. In fact,
     in response, to this Report, Values Education now Edukasyon sa
     Pagpapakatao in the K to 12 Curriculum was introduced as a separate
     subject in the basic education curriculum under the Values Education
     Framework program of Dr. Lourdes Quisumbing, then Department of
     Education, Culture and Sports Secretary in 1988-1990. The Values
     Education Framework was conceptualized in 1987. In 2002, the Basic
     Education Curriculum (Grade 1-6, and First-Fourth Year High School)
     integrated values in the major learning areas or subjects. Beginning with
     the K to 12 Curriculum in 2013, Values Education was renamed
     Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (EsP) for Grades 1-10. In the Senior High
     Curriculum (Grades 11-12), there is no course with the title, Values
     Education or Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao but core courses such as
     Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person and Personal
     Development, are in essence Values Education subjects and Moral
     Education subjects themselves.
              To help every Filipino child grow morally and ethically, he/she
     must be helped acquire the strengths of the Filipino character at the same
     time, he/she must be made to realize that his/her strengths also become
     his/her source of weaknesses.
     Other Studies on Filipino Moral Character
             There had been studies of the Filipino moral life, the more
     popular of which were those Fr. Jaime Bulatao, Fr. Leonardo Mercado,
     Fr. Francis Senden, and Fr. Vitaliano Gorospe. Fr. Bulatao's research
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                           Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                       Midterm Page 12 of 42
     identified the "kami" mentality of Filipinos. In "kami" (a Filipino term
     which means "us") he says, "I identify with my family and relatives... We
     are opposed to all who are not kami." Fr. Vitaliano Gorospe, SJ referred
     to this way of thinking as "group-centeredness" or "group thinking
     characterized as follows:
              One norm of morality in the Philippines is based on "group-
     centeredness" or "group-thinking." One's in-group determines for the
     individual what is right or wrong. The individual who has not yet
     attained moral independence and maturity will ask: “What will others
     say" usually determines Filipino moral behavior; it is "conscience from
     the outside. "For instance, parents tell their daughter who is being
     courted: "Iha, please entertain your boyfriend at home. Do not go
     outside. What will the neighbors say? Nakakahiya naman. Shame or hiya
     makes the parents and the girl conform to the social expectations of the
     neighbors lest they become the object of tsismis or gossip.
     Application
      1. According to the report, one weakness of the Filipino character is
          lack of analysis and emphasis of form (porma). The report states
          that this lack of analysis re and form emphasis on form is reinforced
          by an educational system that is more form than substance…
          What is meant by an educational system that is more form than
              that is more form than substance?
          DO you agree that the Philippine educational system that is more
              form than substance? If yes, why? If not, why not
      2. Teacher observes that when students submit report, the more ornate
          and artistic the folder is, the less substantial the report. Which
          weakness in the Filipino character is pointed to? If you were the
          teacher how do you counteract such?
      3. In line with the government’s austerity program, DepEd Order # 2,
          s. 2019, reiterates the following policies:
         a. Graduation rites should be simple but meaningful to encourage
              civil rights, a sense of community, and personal responsibility.
              While these rites mark a milestone in the life of the learners,
              these should be conducted without excessive spending,
              extravagant attire or extraordinary venue.
         b. Moving Up or Completion Ceremonies should be simple,
              involving only the learners, their parents and the school…
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                        Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 13 of 42
     Which of the weaknesses of the Filipino does this DepEd Order wish
     to help eliminate? Explain.
      4. Group A reported in class first while the other groups listened. The
          other groups were asked to raise questions and comments. Group B
          gave lot of not-so-good comments and many points for
          improvement. Group A concluded Group B is biased against their
          group. Which Filipino weakness is revealed? What should be done?
      5. Cite instances where 1) extreme family centeredness, 2) lack of
          discipline, 3) passivity and lack of initiative, 4) colonial mentality,
          5) kanya-kanya syndrome, Talangka mentality, lack of self-analysis
          and self-reflection are manifested in Philippine society. When can
          we say that Filipino has developed an integrated personality?
      6. What is meant by integrated personality? Or what is integrity? In
          mathematics, an integer is a whole number. Does this help in
          understanding the meaning of integrity? When can we say?
      7. The Taoist principle states: "What I think must be the same as what
          I say and what I say must be the same as what I do." What does this
          mean?
     KEY POINTS
             The Filipino has a number of strengths. His/her strengths when they
              become extreme, however, also become his/her weaknesses.
             His/her strengths help him/her become ethical and moral but his/her
              weaknesses obstruct his/her moral and ethical growth.
             Culture has a significant impact on morality.
             The Filipino group-centeredness and "kami"- mentality make it
              difficult for the Filipino to stand up against the group when that is the
              moral thing to There is much need for home, school and society as a
              whole to help every do.
             There is much need for home, school and society as a whole to help
              every Filipino to grow into the strong moral person everyone is called
              to become.
             For the Filipino to become the moral and ethical person, he/she should
              capitalize on his/her strengths and eliminate his/her weaknesses.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                              Midterm Page 14 of 42
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT
      (Please do not forget to provide information on this part)
     Name: _______________________                  Course& Year:     _____________
     Module Number and Title: ________              Date accomplished: _________
     Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it
     is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. On every
     module’s “End of Module Assessment” (this part), write your answer/s on a one
     whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
     Accomplish this Table.
           Filipino trait    What is positive        What is         What should be
                               about it           negative about     done to make it
                                                        it           a positive trait
      1.
      2.
      3.
      4.
      5.
    LOOKING AHEAD
     Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! The next topic will
     deal on Universal Values! Happy learning!
     REFERENCES
             Ethics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B. Corpuz,
             BSE, MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston Street, Brgy.
             Kaunlaran, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
               College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 15 of 42
                                 Universal Values
                                        Module 9
     OVERVIEW
             After a lesson on cultural relativism and after a discussion on the
     Filipino strengths and weaknesses, let us find out if there are universal
     values.
        LEARNING OUTCOMES
     By the end of this module, you should be able to:
               Identify universal values.
               Explain why universal values are a necessity for human survival.
    LEARNING EXPERIENCES & SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES (SAA
     Activity
                Read then answer the questions.
                               Be honest, even if others are not.
                                           Be honest
                                    Even if others will not
                                     Even if others cannot
                    He who walks honestly, walks securely. - Abhishek Tiwari
     Analysis
        1. Is honesty or truth telling considered a universal value? Why or
             why not?
        2. What are possible consequences of dishonesty?
     Abstract
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                         Midterm Page 16 of 42
          Despite the claims of cultural relativism, the concept on the reality
     universal values persists. Are there universal values? Is honesty universal
     value? Plato talked about the values or virtues of temperance, courage,
     and wisdom. Jesus Christ preached the value of love from which springs
     patience, kindness, goodwill, forgiveness, and compassion. Confucius
     taught righteousness, human-heartedness, filial piety. Are not these
     universal values, that is, they remain values at all times and in all places?
     Yes, Plato would say, they exist apart from the concrete world. On the
     other hand, Aristotle would say that they exist embodied in the concrete
     individual as common or essential characteristic. St. Thomas agreed with
     them, but the universals do not exist apart from the individual; they exist
     as universal features individuated, instantiated in the individuals. In other
     words, the universals are abstracted common features from individuals.
     For example, the universal characteristics of man are that he is a
     "rational, sentient living, body" are abstracted as characteristics common
     to all persons. A human person differs from a stone because he/she is
     alive. He/she differs from living things like plants because he/she is
     sentient, and differs from sentient things like animals because he/she is
     rational. This universal character of a human person exists in the mind as
     idea. Universals are immaterial and immutable, beyond (transcendent)
     space and time, or spatio-temporal conditions. In the words of Van
     Peursen, they are termed as "logical structures" underlying the material
     world and making the world possible.
          The same thing is true with moral standards and values. The values
     of honesty and respect for human life are characteristics individuated in
     all people who respect, do not harm, injure or kill, human beings. All the
     standards and values implied in the Ten Commandments can be reduced
     to the value or rule of love. This is because no one can wish or will the
     opposite, hatred, killing, stealing, to be universal. Values are
     universalized because they can only be wished to be the values of all. For
     instance, one cannot wish that killing be obligatory because it is like
     wishing anyone to come and kill you.
          Using Kant's criteria, can these identified "universal values" be
     willed as universal. Can one will these values be the values of all?
     Certainly, the answer is in the affirmative. Related to the empirical
     findings on the universal values, Dr. Kent M. Keith (2003) came up with
     a list of fundamental, or universal moral principles that can be found
     throughout the world. These are grouped into negative and positive
     statements as follows:
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                          Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                       Midterm Page 17 of 42
         DO NO HARM. Do not do to others what you would not like them
     to do to you. Do not lie. Do not steal. Do not cheat. Do not falsely accuse
     others. Do not commit adultery. Do not commit incest. Do not physically
     or verbally abuse others. Do not murder. Do not destroy the natural
     environment upon which all life depends.
         DO GOOD. Do to others what you would like them to do and
     friends. Be honest and fair. Be generous. Be faithful to your family and
     friends. Take care of your children when they are young. Take care of
     parents when they are old. Take care of those who cannot take a
     themselves. Be kind to strangers. Respect all life. Protect the natural
     environment upon which all life depends.
     Application
          Heads of State and Government, senior UN officials and
     representative of civil society gathered in September 2015, as part of the
     70th session of the UN General Assembly and have adopted the
     Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These objectives form a
     program of sustainable, universal and ambitious development, a program
     of the people, by the people and for the people, conceived with the active
     participation of UNESCO. (https://en.unesco.org/sdgs)
          Here are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals for the period 2015-
     2030. Study and analyze them.
          1.End poverty in all its forms everywhere.
          2.End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and
            promote sustainable agriculture.
          3.Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages.
          4.Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote life-
            long learning opportunities for all.
          5.Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.
          6.Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and and
            sanitation for all
          7.Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern
            energy for all.
          8.Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full
            and productive employment and decent work for all
          9.Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable
            industrialization and foster innovation.
          10. Reduce inequality within and among countries.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                         Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
            College of Teacher Education
                                                               Midterm Page 18 of 42
         11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and
           sustainable.
         12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
         13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts (in
           line with the United Nations Frameworks Convention on Climate
           Change).
         14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine
           resources for sustainable development.
         15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial
           ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification and
           halt and reverse land degradation and half biodiversity loss.
         16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable
           development, provide access to justice for all and build effective,
           accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels.
         17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global
           partnership for sustainable development.
         On what universal values are these 17 SDG 2015-2030 founded?
         2. Explain why universal values are a necessity for human survival.
         3. What are the 30-UN declared human rights? (Hint: Google) Are
              these universal values?
     KEY POINTS
             Universal values are for human survival.
             Universal values are the ultimate bases for living together and learning
              how to live together. Without respect for human life by all then people
              will just kill each other. If honesty or truth telling is not valued by all,
              there will be endless lack of trust among people.
             In spite of cultural relativism, there are values that are universal for
              human survival.
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT
         Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined
     above, it is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. On
     every module’s “End of Module Assessment” (this part), write your answer/s on
     a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 19 of 42
    LOOKING AHEAD
          Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! The next topic will
     deal on The Three Levels of Moral Delimmas! Happy learning!
     REFERENCES
          Etgics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B.
          Corpuz, BSE, MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston
          Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT (Answer Sheet)
     (Please do not forget to provide information on this part)
     Name: _______________________                 Course& Year: _____________
     Module Number and Title: ________             Date accomplished: _________
     Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it
     is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Write your
     answers on a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
     ESSAY
              Before you begin writing, read the passage/questions carefully and plan
     what you will say. Your essay will be evaluated based on the evidence it
     provides of your ability to:
     •        Analyze and evaluate multiple perspectives on a complex issue
     •        State and develop your own perspective on the issue
     •        Explain and support your ideas with logical reasoning and detailed
              examples
     •        Clearly and logically organize your ideas in an essay
     •        Effectively communicate your ideas in standard written English.
              Reminders:
     •        Your essay must consist of three paragraphs; Introduction, Body and
              Conclusion.
     •        An off-topic essay will not be evaluated.
     •        Avoid PLAGIARISM. Express your own thoughts.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                            Midterm Page 20 of 42
     •        Note that the definition copied from the abstraction and in the internet
     will automatically marked as wrong.
      I. The importance of Understanding and the application of Moral Values
                            THE MORAL AGENT
                                        Module 10
     OVERVIEW
              After learning the basic concepts of morality and ethics, let us now turn
     our attention to the in moral agent who is expected to develop in moral and
     ethical character.
         LEARNING OUTCOMES
     By the end of this module, you should be able to:
        To explain what moral agent means.
          To discuss the meaning of fundamental option.
    LEARNING EXPERIENCES & SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVI
     Activity
      1)      Can a dog be a moral agent? Why or why not?
      2)      Can a robot be a moral agent? Why or why not?
     Analysis
               Answer the following questions:
         1.    Among the 3 dilemmas, which is an example of an individual
               dilemma? Organizational dilemma? Structural dilemma?
         2.    How do the 3 dilemmas differ?
     Abstraction
               The Human Person as a Moral Agent
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
              College of Teacher Education
                                                              Midterm Page 21 of 42
              "Moral" comes from the Latin "mores," referring to society's patterns,
     standards, rules of doing things. "Agent" comes from Latin "agere," to do, act. A
     moral agent is one who performs an act in accordance with moral standards. A
     moral agent is the moral actor, one who acts morally.
               A moral agent is "'a being who is capable of those actions that have
     moral quality and which can be properly denominated good or evil in a moral
     sense." (Edwards, 1754) Only a moral agent is capable of human acts. That's
     why "morality is for persons." (Haring, 1971) As will be discussed later, human
     acts are "those of which a man is master, which he has the power of doing or not
     doing as he pleases" or "those acts which proceed from man as a rational being"
     (Edwards, 1754). Only a moral agent is capable of human acts. That's why
     "morality is for persons." (Haring, 1971) As will be discussed later, human acts
     are "those of which a man is master, which he has the power of doing or not
     doing as he pleases" or "those acts which proceed from man as a rational being"
     (Edwards, 1754).
     What is a sufficient condition for moral agency?
               …it will suffice if the agent has the capacity to conform to some of the
     external requirements of morality. So, if certain agents can obey moral laws
     such as 'Murder is wrong' or 'Stealing is wrong, then they are moral agents, even
     if they respond only to prudential reasons such as fear of punishment and even if
     they are incapable of acting for the sake of moral considerations. According to
     the strong version, the Kantian version, it is also essential that the agents should
     have the capacity to rise above their feelings and passions and act for the sake of
     the moral law... (Haksar, V., Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
               Capacity to conform to moral standards, to act for the sake of moral
     considerations, that is, for the sake of moral law, qualifies one to be a moral
     agent. The absence of that capacity to conform to moral standards, as in the case
     of an insane person, excludes you from moral agency. A dog is not, therefore, a
     moral agent because it doesn't have the capacity" to conform to moral standards.
     It cannot knowingly, freely and voluntarily act. It does not have a mind and
     freewill. The same things apply to a robot that is why like the dog, it cannot be a
     moral agent.
     The Purpose-driven Moral Agent
              Where do you go (quo vadis), moral agent?
             For this old question we find an old answer from the textbook written
     by Rev. Charles Collens, S.J. (1924). It is based on the principles laid down by
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                               Midterm Page 22 of 42
     St. Thomas Aquinas. "Every human act is directed toward an end". An end may
     be pursued merely as a means to another end, that is, merely an instrumental
     end. As Aristotle put it, that end which is sought for its own Sake, that is, it is no
     longer sought for the sake of another end, is the summum bonum, the highest
     good. That highest good is happiness. For St. Thomas, the highest good or end is
     happiness but the absolutely final end is God.
               Alfredo Panizo (1964) cites the three Thomistic principles regarding
     the end or purpose of the moral agent: "First Principle: Every agent that
     performs an action acts for the sake of the end or purpose to be attained. In
     other words, a moral agent is purpose-driven. Second Principle: Every agent
     acts for an ultimate end. Third Principle: Every agent has the power of moving
     for an end which is suitable or good for him." Among the various ends or
     purposes of the actions of the moral agent, there is an ultimate end, and this is
     happiness. "From the Christian point of view, a human person's destiny in the
     world is not only to achieve cultural and moral perfection, but to attain the
     eternal happiness of the soul after death of the body. To know, to love, and to
     serve God is our present duty. To see God Himself, Uncreated Splendor, face to
     face, to be united to Him by an unbroken and everlasting operation of the mind,
     shall be our eternal destiny." (Panizo, 1964)
               Such direction of the moral development of the human person is
     derived from the nature or essence of man as contemplated in the works of
     Aristotle, Plato, and St. Thomas Aquinas. His moral life is evaluated or assessed
     in the light of his ultimate destiny. His destiny depends on all the God-given
     potentials he is born with. His act is moral if it realizes his potentials and brings
     him nearer to this goal in life, immoral if it deviates from it.
     The Fundamental Option
               The road of life may have many diversions. Hence, the decision and
     choice to take one way, like Robert Frost's "one less traveled by," one that
     proceeds to the end expected of men, the determination to abide by such end, is
     referred to as adopting the "fundamental option," a free choice to say "yes," like
     a "yes" to God, an affirmative response to God's invitation to follow His way. In
     an article published in the SLU Research Journal, Fr. Emmanuel R. Fernandez
     (1988) explained clearly the theological concept of responding to the call of God
     "by making a fundamental option for Him and ordering one's life accordingly."
     The fundamental option is "the stance or position I decide to take vis-à-vis the
     Absolute Value (God) which then influences ultimately all my other individual
     actions and decisions.
     (Fernandez 1988) Fernandez quotes Janssens (1966):
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                 Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                               Midterm Page 23 of 42
                We understand as a consequence the essential importance of the
     fundamental judgment of conscience; it determines in our actual life the
     measure of knowledge that we attain concerning moral good, by pursuing, that
     is, in the total meaning of existence, the ideal of me to be realized. At all events,
     if this judgment conditions what we consider right to be the content of our
     fundamental choice, our first obligation is to form it sincerely and to perfect it
     assiduously by trying to scrutinize in a better way the objective requirements of
     our destiny. Considering, moreover, that it is impossible to realize the ideal of
     moral perfections only in the light of this judgment, we are compelled to follow
     it faithfully.
              One theologian says that if one is used to a life in accordance with the
     fundamental option, at the moment of death, he/she would be asked by God
     what his/her option will be, and he/she definitely will say yes to God. An insight
     is provided by Troisfontaines (cited by Dy, 2001) on what happens at the
     moment of death:
               ...at the moment of dying, the being takes measure. He chooses his
     degree of intimacy with others..., or on the contrary his centering on self which
     seems preferable to him. He adopts for eternity the attitude which pleases him…
     The fundamental orientation of the soul towards communion or towards
     isolation, will have significance. Every man, whatever his state in life, his
     heredity or the conditions of his existence, has gradually adopted his orientation
     for himself. The person oriented towards charity, who all his life has sought a
     more profound union with God and with others, will open with full spontaneity
     the moment this communion is proposed to him... Finally, it can happen that, in
     spite of the entirely new condition of choice, the completed and egoistic person
     remains obstinate in refusing charity, and elects to be separated for eternity in
     hell. (Dy, 2001)
               In other words, one's choice of his way of life, may be gradually
     established and may be difficult to change it, except by God's grace, at the
     moment of death.
     No Pre-fixed Plan for Man
               According to some 20 Century thinkers there are no pre-existing
     directions. "There are no signs in the heavens." There are no pre-designed, pre-
     fixed design, plan, purpose of man's being according to some 20 century
     thinkers. For the existentialist, like Jean Paul Sartre, a human person is or
     becomes what he/she makes of himself/herself by choice. He/she is nothing, no
     "essence", until he/she starts his/her "existence" by making choices. (Sartre,
     2007) In other words, one who lives a life of blindly following what others
     think, say, and do, is nothing, zero; he/she lives a hollow, empty or meaningless
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                 Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                               Midterm Page 24 of 42
     life. To the process philosophers like Teilhard de Chardin (1948) and Alfred
     North Whitehead, (1996) whatever a human person is or will be a result of a
     creative process. In other words, for all these thinkers, a human person has to
     create his/her end, purpose, or directions. He/she has to invent his/her destiny.
     Since there is no goal or end designed for him/her, he/she would completely be
     the author of what he/she turns out to be. He/she will be totally responsible for
     what he/ she will be. The existentialists and process philosophers do not want
     any other being to be co-responsible with them for what they decide to do. In
     other words, the fundamental option for these thinkers is to remain open to what
     they are able to create, discover, or invent which will guide them to the next
     chapter of their lives, to choose whatever their self-invention leads them to,
     which, of course, is difficult to imagine.
               But other groups, like Martin Heidegger, Gabriel Marcel and Martin
     Buber see themselves as being-with-others, inseparably related to their fellow
     man. By placing their biases and prejudices between brackets, that 1s, by
     suspending their obstructive effects on their vision, they realize who the other
     being is in their presence. The other is another subject like them; the other is
     emitting signals communicating a message calling for their creative response.
     The other is saying, "let us learn to live together", to affirm each other's being.
     Together we go through life, designing our end and purposes, guided by
     messages unveiled in a life of dialogue with ourselves, with other selves, and
     with the world. Consequently, the end, purpose, or direction of beings-with-
     others, is what they discover as they learn to live together. Says Buber, (1957)
     "All real living is meeting", a life of dialogue.
              World to Come" Means "World to Come Out of this World"
               Fr. Rene de Brabander, CICM, former professor in St. Louis
     University, Baguio City, wrote an article entitled, "Christianity in the Modern
     World." The modern Christian departs from the view that earthly life, the world
     of flesh, is a sinful thing and has to be abandoned for the sake heavenly life. But
     "(h)eaven and earth are one and the same thing, you cannot love one and despise
     the other." The world to come, that is, the heavenly world that every Christian
     desire to direct their life to, can only come out or emerged from this world of
     flesh. A person should direct his/her life toward this end, the making of the
     world to come out of this world. What does it mean making the "world to come"
     out of "this world"?
               It means, instead of avoiding "this world" as a sinful world of flesh, we
     involve ourselves in it, improving it, refining it, constructing and developing it,
     perfecting it to bring out the world to come. As Buber was saying, "if you
     hallow this world, you meet the living God." The modern saint is out there
     fighting for justice, building schools and hospitals, clothing the naked, and
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                               Midterm Page 25 of 42
     feeding the hungry, instead of spending most of his time in contemplation.
     (Brabander 1970)
               In Robert Francoeur's Perspective of Evolution, the future world
     toward which a person should direct his/her life is this same material world but
     spiritualized, that is, material world spiritualized, a world devoid of its material
     limitations, a world liberated and freed from its spatio-temporal conditions. To
     contribute to the making of this future world the human person has to participate
     through his/her creative acts of unifying, ordering synthesizing things.
     APPLICATION
       1. Is a permanently insane person considered a moral agent? What about a
          person with some psychological trauma, psychiatric illness episode, or
          medical condition that rendered him insane at the time he committed the
          crime. Is he a moral agent?
       2. Here is a question often raised in relation to fundamental option. What if a
          good person who has dedicated his life to people and God turns away from
          goodness and from God at the last minute of his life. Will he go to hell? On
          the contrary here is a person who has opted to live a life for himself
          disconnected from others and from God but in the last minute of his life
          opts for God, will he go to heaven? Are these likely to happen considering
          the concept of fundamental option?
       3. If you see a bad habit begin to develop, try to nip it in the bud so that it does
          not become ingrained.
       4. If your fundamental option is yes to goodness and God, does this mean
          there will never be times when you digress or deviate from what is good?
       5. God himself or a life that is good is your fundamental option but once in a
          while you may deviate from what is good despite your basic choice of
          goodness. Are these the venial sins referred to by Catholic Christians? What
          must you do to be true to your fundamental option?
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                 Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 26 of 42
     KEY POINTS
             A moral agent is one who performs an act in accordance with moral
              standards.
             A moral agent should have the capacity to rise above his/her feelings
              and passions and acts in accordance with the moral law.
             A moral agent has the capacity to conform to moral standards, to act for
              the sake of moral considerations, that is, for the sake of moral law.
             An insane person, who does not have the capacity to think and choose,
              cannot be a moral agent.
             A dog is, therefore, not a moral agent because it doesn't have the
              capacity to conform to moral standards. It cannot knowingly, freely and
              voluntarily act. It does not have a mind and freewill.
             Like the dog, a robot cannot be a moral agent...
             The moral agent is purpose-driven or end-driven. That end is sought for
              its own sake, an end no longer sought for the sake of another end, the
              highest good which is happiness.
             From the Christian point of view, a human person's destiny in the world
              is not only to achieve cultural and moral perfection, but to attain the
              eternal happiness of the soul after death of the body. As a moral agent
              his duty is to know, to love, and to serve God, his ultimate end.
             Fundamental option is a human person's basic choice or inner
              orientation either for a good life (directed towards others and God) or
              for a bad life (directed towards himself/ herself and cut off from others
              and God.
             Man, as a moral agent adopts the "fundamental option," a free choice to
              say "yes" to God's invitation to follow His way.
             There is no pre-fixed plan for the human person as a moral agent.
             For the existentialist, like Jean Paul Sartre, the human person, the moral
              agent, becomes what he/she makes of himself/herself by choice. He/she
              is nothing no "essence" until he/she starts his/her "existence" by
              making choices...
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 27 of 42
             To the process philosophers like Teilhard de Chardin and Alfred North
              Whitehead, whatever a human person, the moral agent, is or will be is a
              result of a creative process. The moral agent has to create his/her end,
              purpose, or directions. He/she has to invent his/her destiny. Since there
              is no goal or end designed for him/her, he/she would completely be the
              author of what he/she turns out to be. He/she will be totally responsible
              for what he/she will be.
             Other groups, like Martin Heidegger, Gabriel Marcel and Martin Buber
              see the moral agent as a being-with-others, who is inseparably related
              to his/her fellow man. Together with other moral agents, the human
              person goes through lite, designing his/her end guided by messages
              unveiled in a life of dialogue with others and with the world.
             For Brabander, the moral agent directs his/her life to improve, refine,
              develops this world in order to bring out the world to come.
             R. Franceur likewise claims that the moral agent should direct his/her
              life to the spiritualization of this material world.
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT
         Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined
     above, it is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. On
     every module’s “End of Module Assessment” (this part), write your answer/s on
     a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
    LOOKING AHEAD
          Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! The next topic will
     deal on Freedom as Foundation for Moral Acts! Happy learning!
     REFERENCES
          Etgics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B.
          Corpuz, BSE, MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston
          Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 28 of 42
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT (Answer Sheet)
     (Please do not forget to provide information on this part)
     Name: _______________________              Course& Year: _____________
     Module Number and Title: ________          Date accomplished: _________
     Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it
     is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Write your
     answers on a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
     1.   Why can't the lower forms of animals be considered as moral agents?
     2.   For a person's fundamental option either he/she chooses between two. Who
          or which are these two options?
     3.   Study the picture in the cover of this book. Does the picture suggest
          fundamental option? How?
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                           Midterm Page 29 of 42
The Development of Moral Character of the Moral Agent
                                       Module 11
    OVERVIEW
              How does the moral agent, the human person, develop his/her moral
     character This is the concern of this Lesson.
        LEARNING OUTCOMES
     By the end of this module, you should be able to:
               Explain why only human being can be ethical.
     LEARNING EXPERIENCES & SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES (SAA
     Activity
              Share an experience that shaped your values and moral formation. It
     may be a conversation that determined your career, an event that changed the
     course of your life or anything else that you believe has determined what you
     have become.
     Analysis
             What you shared is called defining moment in one's life. What is
     meant by defining moment?
     Abstraction
     Meaning of Defining Moment
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 30 of 42
               What is meant by the defining moments in one's life. Defining moment
     refers to a significant life-changing event or moment that reverberates
     throughout your career and personal life and so changes everything.
              The following quotation explains defining moment further: You make
     thousands of decisions every day.... Each choice shapes what is to come in some
     small way, but occasionally, a decision has the magnitude to be life-changing.
     This kind
               Of moment can change who we are and what we value, with
     reverberations throughout our careers and personal lives.
               While it's still up for debate exactly how much of our morality comes
     from personal experiences, many of us can think of at least one experience that
     has defined us and our beliefs.
               Lain Hensley, chief operating officer at Odyssey Teams, recalls the fear
     and loneliness he felt when he was diagnosed with cancer, for example. His
     illness exposed weaknesses in his leadership and as a result, he writes, he has
     become "a better man, husband, father, employer, speaker and friend." Other
     influential moments can come down to a single conversation...
     The Defining Moments of the Saints
               St. Paul's defining moment was when suddenly a light from heaven
     flashed around him on his way to Damascus. When he and his men were very
     near the city, they were suddenly surrounded by a light so bright that it knocked
     Saul to the ground. "They heard a voice from heaven that said: 'Saul, Saul, why
     do you persecute Me?" And Saul said, "Who are you, Lord? And He said, 'T am
     Jesus, whom you are persecuting; but rise and enter the city, and you will be told
     what you are to do.' (Acts of the Apostles, Chapter 9). From that time on, Paul
     preached Jesus to all men, the one whose followers he persecuted and became
     one of greatest disciples of Jesus.
             St. Augustine's defining moment came while spending time in Milan in
     386 A.D. Here is the story of his conversion:
                While outdoors, he heard the voice of a child singing a song, the words
     of which were, "Pick it up and read it. Pick it up and read it.'" He thought at
     first, that the song was related to some kind of children 's game, but could not
     remember ever having heard such a song before. Then realizing that this song
     might be a command from God to open and read the Scriptures, he located a
     Bible, picked it up, opened it and read the first passage he saw. It was from the
     Letter of Paul to the Romans, Augustine read:
              Not in carousing and drunkenness, not in sexual excess and lust, not in
     quarreling and jealousy. Rather put on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make no
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                              Midterm Page 31 of 42
     provision for the desires of the flesh. (Romans 13:13-14) While he read the
     scripture, Augustine felt as if his heart were flooded with light. He turned totally
     from his life of sin. He was baptized by Bishop Ambrose during the Easter Vigil,
     April 24, 287. Later St. Augustine wrote his famous prayer: "You have made as
     for yourself, Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you."
               Relationship Between Moral acts and Character
             The following essay serves as good explanation of the relationship
     between moral acts and character:
               This essay examined the question of whether moral character is
     necessary for moral behavior I argued that moral character is relevant to moral
     behavior in two important ways. First, given that I am already aware of what I
     ought to do (i.e. of what the "moral" action is), moral character facilitates doing
     that action. The person who has moral character does moral actions more
     readily - more easily and more willingly than one who does not. I also argued
     that moral character matters in a second, much more fundamental way: the
     person who has moral character is able to recognize what is moral and
     occasions for moral behavior in a way that those who lack moral character
     cannot. Those who lack moral character often fail to act morally because they
     simply fail, in many instances, to recognize the morally relevant aspects of the
     situations they find themselves in (Knobel, 2019)
     Application
         1.    Illustrate this with a diagram. Do you agree with this?
               Watch your thoughts;
               they become your words.
                Watch your words;
               they become your actions.
                Watch your actions;
               they become your habits.
                Watch your habits;
                they become your character.
                Watch your character they become your destiny. - Laq-Tzun
         2.    Show the relationship of individual acts and moral character by means
               of a mathematical formula. e.g. individual moral act individual moral
               act + individual moral act = individual moral character Improve on the
               given formula.
         3.    Based on the narration of St. Paul's and St. Augustine's conversation n
               can we Say one's defining moment is one's moment of conversion?
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
              College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 32 of 42
     KEY POINTS
             Defining moment refers to a significant life-changing event or moment
              or conversion in a person's life.
              A person who has moral character does moral actions more readily and
              more willingly than one who does not. Therefore, it is good to develop
              moral character.
             It is, therefore, best for all persons to develop moral character. Moral
              character is formed by repeatedly doing moral acts.
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT
         Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined
     above, it is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. On
     every module’s “End of Module Assessment” (this part), write your answer/s on
     a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
    LOOKING AHEAD
          Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! The next topic will
     deal on Culture: How It Defines Moral Behavior! Happy learning!
     REFERENCES
          Etgics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B.
          Corpuz, BSE, MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston
          Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                           Midterm Page 33 of 42
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT (Answer Sheet)
     (Please do not forget to provide information on this part)
     Name: _______________________              Course& Year: _____________
     Module Number and Title: ________          Date accomplished: _________
     Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined above, it
     is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. Write your
     answers on a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
     1.   Define defining moment in a person's life.
     2.   Explain the relationship between moral acts and moral character.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                             Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                            Midterm Page 34 of 42
                  The Stages of Moral Development
                                       Module 12
    OVERVIEW
              If a human person has developed a moral character, the facility to act
     morally and ethically is in his/her hands. What are the stages of moral
     development that the human person as a moral agent undergoes?
        LEARNING OUTCOMES
     By the end of this module, you should be able to:
             Describe each stage of moral development.
             Evaluate one's personal growth against the stages of personal
              development
     LEARNING EXPERIENCES & SELF-ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES (SAA
     Activity
     1. Answer this question:
         What makes you come to school every day? Check that/those which
         applies /apply to you?
     _________Teachers tell me so (school policy)
     _________I am afraid to be dropped and fail.
     _________To show to my parents and teachers that I am a good student
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                              Midterm Page 35 of 42
     _________I promised my parents never to be absent.
     _________It is the right thing to do; school rules 'say so.
     _________I want to become a professional.
     Analysis
     1. Among the reasons given, agree as partners on the best reason for
          coming to school every day and why.
     2. What are very adequate reasons? What are not very adequate
          reasons?
     Abstraction
     Meaning of Defining Moment
              As previously explained, the moral agent, the human person, is a being
     capable of acting "with reference to right and wrong," that is, one who is capable
     of being moral, having a moral character.
              Social psychologists look at the moral agent as he is, where he is, in the
     society where he lives. From birth, he/she is cared, nurtured and influenced by
     the world around him/her. He/she grows up in a family, develops in a society,
     and thus he/she is exposed to all the do's and dont's of his/her family and his/her
     society. His/her moral life, his/her norms and moral standards, are shaped by the
     prevalent cultural influences. In other words, as disclosed and unveiled as he/she
     is, the moral agent undergoes development.
              Moral development refers to the "process through which a human
     person gains his/her beliefs, skills and dispositions that make him/her a morally
     mature person. William A. Kay (1970) has the following to say regarding the
     nature of moral development.
              ... Just as the pattern of intellectual growth can be simply described as
     passing through stages of animal behavior, pre-logical thinking, thought
     governed by empirical logic and finally by formal logic, so morality can be
     described as passing through stages of behavior controlled first, by taboo; then
     second, by law; third by conscience (i.e. irrational, intrajected values); fourth, by
     reciprocity; fifth, by social consensus and finally by personal moral principles,
     though not necessarily in that order.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 36 of 42
              Stated differently, the five stages may be reduced to three as
     follows:
      The amoral stage - egocentric, hedonist and prudential
              considerations.
      The pre-moral stage authoritarian, ego-idealist, social and
              reciprocal considerations.
      The moral stage-personal, autonomous, altruistic, rational,
              independent and responsible considerations.
              Let’s analyze your answers in the Activity phase of this lesson. If vour
     reasons to go to school are "I am afraid to be dropped and fail” and to show “to
     my parents that I am a good student" you are in the a-moral's ego-idealist stage.
     If you go to school everyday because "I promised to my parents I will never be
     absent that is William Kay's pre-moral stage (social and reciprocal
     consideration.) It your reason is t is the right thing to do " you have reached
     Kay's moral stage -personal, autonomous, rational, independent and rational
     considerations.
     Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development
              Moral development refers to the process through which a human
     person, gains his/her beliefs, skills and dispositions that makes him/her a
     morally mature person". Kohlberg (2013) describes the stages of moral
     development in 3 stages, namely: Level1- Preconventional morality, Level
     2-Conventional morality, and Level 3, Post-Conventional morality. Each
     level has two stages each so that there are six stages of moral development,
     They are described in detail below:
     Level 1 Pre-conventional morality
               This is the lowest level of moral development in Kohlberg's theory. At
     the pre-conventional level children don't have a personal code of morality.
     Instead, their moral code is controlled by the standards of adults and the
     consequences of following or breaking adults' rules. Authority is outside the
     individual and reasoning is based on the physical consequences of actions.
     There is no internalization of moral values.
         Stage 1. Obedience and Punishment Orientation. The child/individual
          Does good in order to avoid being punished. If he/she is punished, he/she
     must have done wrong. Children obey because adults tell them to obey. Moral
     decisions are based on fear of punishment. It is a matter of obey or you get
     punished. e.g. Josef does not cheat because he is afraid of a punishment, a
     failing grade and "I go to school because I am afraid to be dropped and fail.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                                 Midterm Page 37 of 42
         Stage 2: Instrumental Orientation. Right behavior is defined by
          Whatever the individual believes to be in his/her best interest. "What's in it
     for me?" In this stage there is limited interest in the needs of others, only to the
     point where it might further the individual's own interests. It is a matter of "you
     scratch my back, and I ‘ll scratch yours” mentality. An example would be when
     a child is asked by his parents to do a chore. The child asks "what's in it for
     me?" and the parents offer the child a reward by giving him a treat.
     In this stage, right involves equal exchange. e.g. Mario sees Juan get Miguel's
     pen. Soon he sees Miguel retaliate by. taking Juan's favorite pen. Mario does not
     report the incident to the teacher because they involve equal exchanges.
     Level 2: Conventional
               Throughout the conventional level, a child's sense of morality is tied to
     personal and societal relationships. Children continue to accept the rules of
     authority figures, but this is now due to their belief that this is necessary to
     ensure positive relationships and societal order. Adherence to rules and
     conventions is somewhat rigid during these stages and a rules appropriateness or
     fairness is seldom questioned.
     Stage 3: "Good Boy, Nice Girl" Orientation
              In stage 3, children want the approval of others and act in ways to avoid
     disapproval. Emphasis is placed on good behavior and people being nice to
     others. The individual is good in order to be seen as being a good person by
     others. Therefore, answers relate to the approval of others. The individual values
     caring and loyalty to others as a basis for moral judgments. e.g. if a politician is
     around in times of calamities primarily because he wants to appear "good boy"
     or "good girl" to electorates, he displays stage 3 moral developmental stage. To
     show to my parents and teachers that I am a good student" and "I promised by
     parents never to be absent fall under this stage of good boy, nice girl orientation.
     Stage 4. Law and Order Orientation.
                The child/individual becomes aware of the wider rules of society, so
     judgments concern obeying the rules in order to uphold the law and to avoid
     guilt. It is a matter of "I have to do this because the law says so." It is still blind
     obedience to the law so morality still lacks internalization. "It is the right thing
     to do; school rules say so'" as reasons for going to school are in stage 4.
     Level 3 - Post-conventional Morality
               This is the level of full internalization. Morality is completely
     internalized and not based on external standards. Individual judgment is based
     on self-chosen principles and moral reasoning is based on individual rights and
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                                  Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 38 of 42
     justice. According to Kohlberg this level of moral reasoning is as far as most
     people get.
      Stage 5. Social contract orientation- The child/individual becomes aware
          that while rules/laws might exist for the good of the greatest number, there
          are times when they will work against the interest of particular individuals.
          In this level, individuals reason out that values, rights and principles
          transcend the law.
      Laws are regarded as social contracts rather than rigid orders. Those that
          do not promote the general welfare should be changed when necessary to
          meet the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
               Stage 6. Universal, ethical, principle orientation. Individuals at this
     Stage nave developed their own set of moral guidelines which may or may not
     fit the law. They have developed moral judgments that are based on universal
     human rights. The principles apply to everyone.
     e.g., human rights, justice, and equality. The person will be prepared to act to
     defend these principles even if it means going against the rest of society in the
     process and haying to pay the consequences of disapproval and/or
     imprisonment. When faced with a dilemma between law and conscience, the
     person follows his conscience.
     Kohlberg doubted few people reached this stage. (McLeod, 2013)
     Development of conscience-based moral decision
               Moral development includes development of conscience-based moral
     decision. This is in the post-conventional level of Kohlberg's stages of moral
     development. Panizo defines conscience as "an act of the practical Judgment of
     reason deciding upon an individual action as good and to be performed and as
     evil and to be avoided." It is metaphorically referred to as the "inner or little
     voice of God." Panizo (1964) quotes St. Thomas regarding the obligatory force
     of conscience: "Every conscience, whether right or erroneous, whether with
     regard to acts which are evil in themselves or acts which are indifferent, is
     obligatory, so that he who acts in opposition to his conscience, does wrong."
     Rev. Thomas V. Berg, (2012) defines conscience as follows:
     In the NL (natural law) tradition, conscience is understood to be a judgment
     emanating from human reason about choices and actions to be made, or
     accomplished, or already opted for and performed...
              Aquinas held that conscience, in the strict sense, was as an act of
     human reason-called a judgment-following upon, and concluding, a time of
     deliberation. In this sense, conscience is the interior resounding of reason.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 39 of 42
     Conscience is reason's awareness of a choice, or an action's harmony or
     disharmony, with the kind of behavior which truly leads to our genuine well-
     being, and flourishing
     If our choice or action is not in accord with the judgment of a rightly formed and
     active conscience, then that judgment will linger in our conscious awareness,
     presenting itself as a felt disharmony between the choice, and the moral norm
     (and corresponding virtue), being violated. While such felt disharmony is indeed
     of an emotive nature (e.g. a healthy emotional guilt), the judgment of conscience
     remains something distinct and irreducible to the negative feeling which
     happens to accompany it.
     The formation of conscience
               Corresponding therefore to the prior discussion on moral development
     is the formation of conscience. What then is meant when it is said that the
     conscience must be "formed"?
     …First, conscience formation begins with the deep-seated decision to seek
     moral truth. One adopts, as a way of life, the habit of seeking out answers to
     questions about right and wrong, persevering in that quest until one arrives at a
     state of moral certainty, after having made the most reasonable effort possible to
     arrive at those answers. Second, a sound conscience must stand on the firm
     foundation of integrity, sincerity and forthrightness. Duplicity, personal
     inconsistency and dishonesty undermine any hope of forming a properly
     functioning conscience. Third, conscience formation is sustained by the habit
     of consistently educating oneself by exposure to objective moral norms and
     the rationale behind those norms.
               Conscience needs a guide... The Church's moral teaching, while
     certainly enlightened by divinely revealed law, is, at its core, the application of
     what this tradition has discovered over the centuries about the kinds of behavior
     that lead us to live genuinely fulfilling, human lives. You do not place yourself
     at odds with such a tradition lightly.
               Consequently, conscience formation requires a habit of on-going self-
     formation (what we might call moral information
     gathering) through study, reading, and other types of inquiry. This includes
     consultation with persons whose moral judgment we know to be sound and in
     accord with the Church's moral tradition. Finally, conscience, if it is to be
     correct, needs the assistance of the virtue of prudence. By "prudence, “we mean
     the virtue as understood within the NL (natural law) tradition. This should not be
     confused with timidity, "covering one's back” or dissimulation (hiding the truth).
     Berg, 2012.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 40 of 42
               It may be added, as clarified in Fr. Vitaliano Gorospe (1974), that
     getting to the highest-level, conscience-based moral decision can mean the
     widening human consciousness. It is a growth or development from family
     Consciousness to clan consciousness, community consciousness, town
     consciousness, provincial, regional, national, and international or global
     consciousness. As one's consciousness widens, the moral parameters or
     standards of one’s decision making widens, one’s moral conscience widens,
     one matures.
     Application
     1. The Heinz dilemma
     A Woman was on her deathbed, There was one drug that the doctors thought
     might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had
     recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was
     charging ten times what the drug cost him to produce. He paid $200 for the
     radium and charged S2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's
     husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could
     only get together about $1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist
     that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later.
     But the druggist said: "No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money
     from it. "So, Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's laboratory to steal the
     drug for his wife. Should Heinz have broken into the laboratory to steal the drug
     for his wife? Why or why not?
               From a theoretical point of view, it is not important what the
     participant thinks that Heinz should do. Kohlberg's theory holds that the
     justification the participant offers is what is significant, the form of their
     response. Below are some of many examples of possible arguments. Based on
     the given arguments, identify the stage among Kohlberg's six stages of moral
     development:
           Heinz should not steal the medicine because he will consequently
     be put in prison which will mean he is a bad person.
           Heinz should steal the medicine because he will be much happier if
     he saves his wife, even if he will have to serve a prison sentence.
           Heinz should not steal the medicine because prison is an awful
     place, and he would more likely languish in a jail cell than over his
     wife's death.
           Heinz should steal the medicine because his wife expects it; he
     wants to be a good husband.
           Heinz should not steal the drug because stealing is bad and he is not
     a criminal; he has tried to do everything he can without breaking
     the law, you cannot blame him.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                              Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                           Midterm Page 41 of 42
           Heinz should not steal the medicine because the law prohibits
     stealing, making it illegal.
           Heinz should steal the drug for his wife but also take the prescribed
     punishment for the crime as well as paying the druggist what he is
     owed. Criminals cannot just run around without regard for the law;
     actions have consequences.
           Heinz should steal the medicine because everyone has a right to
     choose life, regardless of the law
     Heinz should steal the medicine, because saving a human life
     is a more fundamental value than the property rights of another
     person.
           Heinz should not steal the medicine, because others may need the
     medicine just as badly, and their lives are equally significant.
     2. Give reasons why students cheat /don't cheat. Classify the given reasons
     based on Kohlberg's six stages.
     3. Longitudinal data on studies of Kohlberg's theory show a relation of
     the stages to age, although a few people ever attain the two highest
     stages. Only 10-15% are capable of the kind of abstract thinking
     necessary for stage 5 or 6 (post-conventional morality). That is to say,
     most people take their moral views from those around them and only a
     minority think through ethical principles for themselves. What should be
     done in values education/character education classes to help students
     advance in their moral development and reach the 2 highest stages?
     4. Which level of Kohlberg's moral development did the Greatest Teacher,
     Jesus Christ, reach? Explain your answer.
     5. Acting in accordance with the dictates of your conscience is in which
     developmental stage of Kohlberg.
     KEY POINTS
             Defining moment refers to a significant life-changing event or moment
              or conversion in a person's life.
              A person who has moral character does moral actions more readily and
              more willingly than one who does not. Therefore, it is good to develop
              moral character.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                            Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education
                                                             Midterm Page 42 of 42
             It is, therefore, best for all persons to develop moral character. Moral
              character is formed by repeatedly doing moral acts.
     END OF MODULE ASSESSMENT
         Now that you have finished the review of the various concepts outlined
     above, it is now time for an assessment to see how far you have improved. On
     every module’s “End of Module Assessment” (this part), write your answer/s on
     a one whole sheet of yellow pad paper.
    LOOKING AHEAD
          Congratulations for making it till the end of this module! The next topic will
     deal on Culture: How It Defines Moral Behavior! Happy learning!
     REFERENCES
          Etgics by: Ruben A. Copuz, AB English-Philo, Lib, PhD, Brenda B.
          Corpuz, BSE, MAEd, PhD and Lorimar Publishing, INC 10-B Boston
          Street, Brgy. Kaunlaran, Cubao, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
OSMEÑA COLLEGES
                                                               Aspire…Achieve…Advance!
             College of Teacher Education