Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
DILG-NAPOLCOM Center, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, West Triangle, Quezon City
http://www.dilg.gov.ph
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA INCENTIVES AWARDS
CRITERIA POINT HOW TO RATE THE LUPONG
SCORE TAGAPAMAYAPA
I. EFFICIENCY IN OPERATION 42
A. Observance of Settlement 10
Procedure and Settlement
Deadlines
1. a) Proper Recording of every 5 5 points - submitted/presented the record book or
dispute/complaint logbook reflecting all the required details
2.5 points - submitted/presented the record book
or logbook reflecting some of the necessary
details
O point - no presented record book or logbook
Note: Check if the record contains docket
number, names of the parties, date and time
filed, nature of the case and disposition
b) Sending of Notices and 5 5 points - submitted/presented 80-100% of
Summons with complete and summons with complete and accurate information
accurate information to the issued within the prescribed period
parties within the prescribed
period (within the next working 3 points - submitted/presented 50-79% of
day upon receipt of complaint) summons with complete and accurate information
issued within the prescribed period
2 points - submitted/presented 1-49% of
summons with complete and accurate information
issued within the prescribed period
0 point – have not submitted/presented any
summons/notices
Note: Scores will be given only when file copy of
the notices and summons issued within the next
working day is with date and time stamped of the
receipt.
2. Settlement and Award Period 10 10 points – 80-100% cases were resolved using
any mode of ADR (supported by minutes of
(with at least 10 settled cases proceedings) within the prescribed period
within the assessment period)
8 points - 60-79% cases were resolved using any
a.) Mediation (within 15 days mode of ADR (supported by minutes of
from initial confrontation with proceedings) within the prescribed period
the Lupon Chairman)
b.) Conciliation (15 days from 6 points - 40-59% cases were resolved using any
initial confrontation with the mode of ADR (supported by minutes of
Pangkat) proceedings) within the prescribed period
c.) Conciliation (with extended
period not to exceed another 4 points - 20-39% cases were resolved using any
15 days) mode of ADR (supported by minutes of
d.) Arbitration (within 10 days proceedings) within the prescribed period
from the date of the
agreement to arbitrate) 2 points - 1-19 % cases were resolved using any
e.) Conciliation beyond 46 days mode of ADR (supported by minutes of
but not more than 60 days proceedings) within the prescribed period
on a clearly meritorious
cases 0 point - 0 cases were resolved using any mode
of ADR (supported by minutes of proceedings)
within the prescribed period
B. Systematic Maintenance of 5
Records
1. Record of Cases
For cities:
For Cities - computer 2 2 points if presented photos of the computer
database with searchable database with searchable engine. During onsite,
case information to check the actual database and try the search
engine
For Municipalities:
a. Manual Records 1 For Municipalities:
b. Digital Record Filing 1 1 point if presented copy/photo of the manual
record
1 point if presented digital record filing
To check the actual document during onsite
validation
To check the quality of the file management -
Record of dockets cases should be arranged in
chronological order, folders properly labelled.
2. Copies of Minutes of Lupon 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation
meetings with attendance
sheets and notices Note: During the table assessment, the MOVs
presented should suffice. However, the
assessment team should inspect the complete
physical records during onsite validation.
3. Copies of reports submitted to 1 1 point – complete and accurate compilation
the Court and to the DILG
on file Note: During the table assessment, the MOVs
presented should suffice. However, the
assessment team should inspect the complete
physical records during onsite validation.
4. All records are kept on file in a 1 1 point if judicial standard is observed, where
secured filing cabinet(s) filing cabinets is secured with lock and have key
Note: During the table assessment, the MOVs
presented should suffice. However, the
assessment team should inspect the filing cabinet
during onsite validation.
C. Timely Submissions to the 7
Court and the DILG
1. To the Court: 5 5.0 points = 80%-100% submitted on time
Submitted/ presented copies 4.0 points = 60%-79% submitted on time
of settlement agreement to 3.0 points = 40%-59% submitted on time
the Court from the lapse of 2.0 points = 20%-39% submitted on time
the ten-day period repudiating 1.0 point = 1%-19% submitted on time
the mediation/ conciliation 0 point = 0% of reports submitted on time
settlement agreement, or
within five (5) calendar days Note: Copies of transmittal letters must be
from the date of the stamped as received by the Court. No score will
arbitration award be given in the absence of the said court stamped
document.
2. To the DILG (Quarterly) 2 2 points - Submitted/presented of the required
report to the DILG within the prescribed period
1 point – submitted/presented partial report of the
DILG within the prescribed period.
0 point - the required report to the DILG was not
submitted or submitted beyond the prescribed
period
Note: Copies of transmittal letters must be
stamped as received by the DILG. No score will
be given in the absence of the said DILG stamped
document.
D. Conduct of monthly meetings 10
for administration of the
Katarungang Pambarangay
(KP)
1. Notice of Meeting 2 2.0 points – minimum of 12 meetings with KP-
related matters, complete details, each Lupon
member must sign (indicating their name, date
and time of receipt) when receiving notices of
meeting.
1.0 point – anything beyond the compliance
document, with incomplete details
0 point = no data presented
Notes: This indicator should only be given scores
if the agenda of the meeting is confirmed to
directly pertain to administration of the
Katarungang Pambarangay
Copies of Notices of Meetings must be
signed/stamped as acknowledged by the Lupon
members. No score will be given in the absence
of the said acknowledged document.
In case a meeting for a particular month was not
conducted due to instances like the covid19
pandemic, a certification from the DILG on the
reason thereof must have been submitted.
2. Minutes of the Meeting 8 Number of months with KP-related meetings with
minutes and attendance sheets conducted:
8.0 points = 12 months
6.0 points = 9-11 months
4.0 points = 6-8 months
2.0 points = 3-5 months
1.0 point = 1-2 months
0 point = no meeting
Note: KP Matters must directly pertain to
complaints filed before the Lupon, case
management, dispute resolution procedures and
techniques, trainings/capacity building and
information campaign on KP, and resources,
support and partnerships for KP.
II. EFFECTIVENESS IN SECURING 20
THE SETTLEMENT OF
INTERPERSONAL DISPUTE
OBJECTIVE OF THE KATARUNGANG
PAMBARANGAY
A. Quantity of settled cases 10 With a minimum of 10 cases settled, the
against filed percentage of cases received by the Lupon
resulting to settlement:
10.0 points = 100%
8.0 points = 80%-99%
6.0 points = 60%-79%
4.0 points = 40%-59%
2.0 points = 1%-39%
0 point = 0%
B. Quality of Settlement of Cases 1 point - for non-recurrence and zero cases
repudiated (out of the total number of settled
1. Zero cases repudiated 1 cases)
2. Non-recurrence of cases 1
settled 0 point - at least one (1) (out of the total number
of settled cases)
C. At least 80% compliance with 8 8 points = 80% -100% compliance with the terms
the terms of settlement or of settlement or award
award after the cases have
been settled 6 points = 70% -79% compliance with the terms
of settlement or award
4 points = 60% -69% compliance with the terms
of settlement or award
2 points = 50% -51% compliance with the terms
of settlement or award
1 point = 49% and below compliance with the
terms of settlement or award
III. CREATIVITY AND
RESOURCEFULNESS OF THE 30
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
A. Settlement Technique utilized 10 10 points – five or more settlement technique
by the Lupon utilized
8 points – at least four settlement technique
utilized
6 points - at least 3 settlement technique utilized
4 points - at least 2 settlement technique utilized
2 points - at least 1 settlement technique utilized
0 point – no report
Note: Settlement techniques to be considered are
those that are within the KP process and
procedures.
B. Coordination with Concerned 5 5 points - with proof of coordination relative to the
Agencies relating to disputes filed disputes
filed (PNP, DSWD, DILG, DAR,
DENR, Office of the Prosecutor, 0 point - without proof of coordination relative to
Court, DOJ, CHR, etc.) the filed disputes
C. Sustained information drive to 5
promote Katarungang
Pambarangay
1. For Cities For Cities:
2 2 points - IEC materials produced
● IEC materials developed
1 1 point – IEC activities conducted
● IEC activities conducted 2 2 points - Innovative Campaign Strategy
● Innovative Campaign
Strategy For Municipalities
2 2 points - IEC materials produced
2. For Municipalities 2 2 points – IEC activities conducted
1 1 point - Innovative Campaign Strategy
● IEC materials developed
● IEC activities conducted
● Innovative Campaign
Strategy
D. KP Training or seminar within 10 Trainings or seminars should cover the following,
the assessment period and the Lupon should be able to articulate during
Organized skills training validation their learnings therefrom:
participated by the Lupong
Tagapamayapa 1) General/basic orientation or review of the KP
system
2) Skills training on conduct of KP proceedings
e.g. relevant ADR systems, KP case
management
3) Advanced knowledge on laws, policies, and
standards in relation to the KP system e.g.
gender and human rights, criminal/civil justice
10 points = at least 6 qualified training/seminar
8 points = at least 5 qualified training/seminar
6 points = at least 4 qualified training/seminar
4 points = at least 3 qualified training/seminar
2 points = at least 2 qualified training/seminar
0 point = No qualified information
training/seminar
Note: The OADR conducts free webinar series
and regional road show in relation to KP
IV. AREA OR FACILITY FOR KP 5
ACTIVITIES
For cities:
● Building structure or space 5 points – office or room for exclusive use during
KP proceedings with tables, chairs and other
For cities – the office or furniture and necessary equipment
space should be exclusive for
KP matters 2 points – office or room for shared use during
KP proceedings with tables, chairs and other
For municipalities – KP furniture and necessary equipment
office or space may be shared
or used for other Barangay
matters.
V. FINANCIAL OR NON-FINANCIAL 3
SUPPORT
1. From City, Municipal, Provincial 2 2 points - received support from the both
or NGAs National & Local Government
1.5 points - received support from the either
National & Local Government
0 point - no support
Note: 1. Excluding the regular appropriations for
the barangay and incentives from the DILG
programs
2. Acknowledgement receipt should be signed by
both the donor and recipient.
3. Additional honoraria or support from the Lupon
on top of the mandatory allocations
3 From People's Organizations, 1 1 point – received support from either the
NGOs or Private Sector organization or individual
0 point – no support received from either the
organization or individual
TOTAL 100
