This document is a parts examination check sheet for a supplier. It contains check points across various categories like appearance, dimension, assembly condition, and others. For each check point it indicates whether the part passed or failed for tooling types like die verification, trial production, and mass production. It also notes any concerns found and required corrective actions. The check sheet is used to ensure supplier parts meet specifications and quality guidelines.
This document is a parts examination check sheet for a supplier. It contains check points across various categories like appearance, dimension, assembly condition, and others. For each check point it indicates whether the part passed or failed for tooling types like die verification, trial production, and mass production. It also notes any concerns found and required corrective actions. The check sheet is used to ensure supplier parts meet specifications and quality guidelines.
This document is a parts examination check sheet for a supplier. It contains check points across various categories like appearance, dimension, assembly condition, and others. For each check point it indicates whether the part passed or failed for tooling types like die verification, trial production, and mass production. It also notes any concerns found and required corrective actions. The check sheet is used to ensure supplier parts meet specifications and quality guidelines.
This document is a parts examination check sheet for a supplier. It contains check points across various categories like appearance, dimension, assembly condition, and others. For each check point it indicates whether the part passed or failed for tooling types like die verification, trial production, and mass production. It also notes any concerns found and required corrective actions. The check sheet is used to ensure supplier parts meet specifications and quality guidelines.
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
Parts Examination Check Sheet
Issued Date Revised Date Project For use of supplier's signature Supplier name
Examiner Supplier code Parts name Parts number
History and status information of quality development (including ECN history) Guideline G The check point resulted in OK Y There's a concern. Investigation requir R The check point resulted in NOK N/A Not applicable
Completio DC Completion Category Check Point TT PP MP Concern(s) Corrective Action(s) n date V due date 1 2 Appearance
3 4 5 6 1 2 Dimension
3 4 5 6 1 2 Components condition of Assembly
3 4 5 6 1 Functionality Structure and
2 3 4 5 6 1 Paint or surface
2 treatment
3 4 5 6 1 2 Reliability
3 4 5 6 1 and gauge evaluation Inspection method
2 3 4 5 6 1 2 Productivity
3 4 5 6 1 Past Concerns
2 Recurrence Prevention
3 4 5 6 1 icle condition valuation in
2 Assembly
1/2 Parts Examination Check Sheet Issued Date 2012/12/25 Revised Date Project J*** For use of supplier's signature Supplier name ***Corporation
Examiner Mr. ** from ****Dept. Supplier code K*** Mr. ** from ****Dept. Part name *** Mr. ** from ****Dept. Part number ***
History and status information of quality development (including ECN history) Guideline ECN # ***-****, date **/**/** G The check point resulted in OK e.g. : Shape has been changed with the ECN so parts cannot be grained TT build. To be grained with PP build Y There's a concern. Investigation required. ECN # ***-****, date R The check point resulted in NOK N/A Not applicable ECN # ***-****, date
Completio DC Completion Category Check Point TT PP MP Concern(s) Corrective Action(s) n date V due date 1 Check harmful sink, weld, P/L step, material shortage TT: Weld too big Adjust molding condition and Y Y Y G ### 2012/12/15 wrinkles, flow mark, trapped gas or burr. evaluate with PP grained parts 2 Is the location and finish of gate appropriate? Acceptance sample for gate Y G G G finish already established. 2012/12/1 2012/12/13 Appearance
3 Is there any appearance concern, such as deformation,
Y G G G distortion, discoloration? 4 Are color and grain (depth, area, pattern and directionality) Grain has not been Evaluate with grained PP within specification? N/A N/A Y G done to TT parts so parts. unable to evaluate. 5 6 1 Is all-characteristics-inspection conducted? 2 Are R shape and designed surface within specification? 3 Is the processing tolerance for on the drawing satisfied? 4 Is the other clearance on the drawing satisfied? (Especially clip fitting area?) Dimension
5 Do the dimension of diameter and boss as mounting
reference satisfy the drawing? 6 Do backside rib location and its dimension satisfy the 7 drawing? Do reference thickness and shape of cross section satisfy drawing? 8 Is there any possibility of deformation after molding due to poor stiffness? 9 Isn't the gate placed where the operator may touch or be 1 hurt? Are insertion force and gripping force appropriate when Assembly condition of
assembled to the vehicle body?
Components
2 Is not there interference or noise issue when assembled to
vehicle body? 3 Does the part fit to the vehicle body? 4 Are clearance and step good after assembled to vehicle 5 body? 6 1 Are the material and grade according to the drawing? Structure and Functionality
2 Is there any possibilities of chemical changes with the
3 adjacent Is parts? fastening and tightening force of clip and stud 4 appropriate? Is not there any rust or abrasion due to interference? 5 Is the clip insertion and gripping force appropriate? 6 1 Isn't there any plating concern? 2 Is the area to be plated suitable for plating? 3 Is not there possibility of rust? 4 Is the part plated according to the drawing? 5 Is appearance good? Paint or surface treatment
6 Check thin paint.
7 Is paint according to the drawing? (Color and gloss） 8 Is there any edges and small R shape that may lead to thin 9 paint? Is not there any defects such as repelling, orange peeling, foreign material, pin hole, flows, uneven gloss etc? 10 Is appearance of break line good? Is it possible to make acceptance sample for line dislocation? 11 Paint break area shall have no grain (min. 2.0mm in 12 width.) Is not there any possibilities of crack, dulling and uneven surface due to insufficient stiffness and strength? 13 Has weld area tested for adhesion? 1 Have all the performance tests in the drawing successfully done? (Plating, painting, cryogenic condition, strength and special requirements) Reliability
2 3 4 5 6 1 Is inspection method appropriate? (Measuring instrument, and gauge evaluation Inspection method
2 methods, Is frequency the gauge usable? and so there Is not on.） any concern such as 3 interference and poor Is judging criteria accuracy? established? 4 Is measurement method established? 5 6 1 Is not there any difficult operation that leads unstable 2 quality? Has production requirement attained? Productivity
3 Does processing tolerance have sufficient capability?
4 Isn't there any unstable characteristic at molding? （Deformation due to difficult pull-out operation) 5 Isn't there any manual operation that trust operators 6 institution? Isn't there any characteristic that depends on 100% check? 1 Have actions of past critical concern and defect with frequent occurrence been taken to similar parts? Past Concerns Recurrence Prevention
