[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views3 pages

Fatigue Design Calculation

This document provides a simplified fatigue analysis for a structural weld on an FPSO project. It details the input parameters used, including a 30 year design life. It determines the allowable stress range is 120.6 MPa based on interpolation of tables for stress range and utilization factor. The analysis is to verify the weld meets fatigue requirements over its design life.

Uploaded by

innovativekarthi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views3 pages

Fatigue Design Calculation

This document provides a simplified fatigue analysis for a structural weld on an FPSO project. It details the input parameters used, including a 30 year design life. It determines the allowable stress range is 120.6 MPa based on interpolation of tables for stress range and utilization factor. The analysis is to verify the weld meets fatigue requirements over its design life.

Uploaded by

innovativekarthi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

PROJECT NAME Integrado Parque das Baleias Development Project-FPSO

Maria Quiteria
SIMPLIFIED FATIGUE ANALYSIS DOCUMENT NO. 2023-VMEP-90-N-CA-00036

REVISION NO. C1

SIMPLIFIED FATIGUE ANALYSIS


Note: At EL+45410 Typical beam connection with varying thickness is choosen and Maximum stress among all the member is taken and fatigue
check is carried out.
Codes and standards
DNV-RP-0005
Input Data: DNV-RP-C203
DNV-OS-C102
1 Design service life of the structure = 30 years
2 Thickness of the plate to be weld t = 22 mm
(Refer Sec.11,Cl.3.4.5-Table4
3 Design fatigue factor DFF = 1
in DNV-OS-C102
(Refer table -5.8 in DNV-RP-
4 Utilisation factor η η = 0.67
C203)
5 Allowable stress of structural weld material f y,weld = 268 N/mm2
6 Overall length of the ship L = 333 m
7 Type of weld to be used W2
8 Environmental type Air

Table 5-8 Utilisation factors η as function of design life and design fatigue factor
Design life in years
DFF
5 10 15 20 25 30 50
1 4 2 1.33 1 0.8 0.67 0.4
2 2 1 0.67 0.5 0.4 0.33 0.2
3 1.33 0.67 0.44 0.33 0.27 0.22 0.13
5 0.8 0.4 0.27 0.2 0.16 0.13 0.08
10 0.4 0.2 0.13 0.1 0.08 0.07 0.04

Weibull shape parameter


As per "Topside Structural Design Basis - 2023-YINS-90-N-FD-00001", The Weibull shape parameter shall be considered as 1
Weibull shape parameter h = 1
?
Allowable stress range is derived by a linear interpolation of Table 5-2 and Weibull shape parameter h = 1
Table 5-2 Allowable extreme stress range in Mpa during 10 8 cycles for components in air (Clause 5-2)
Weibull shape parameter h
S-N curves
0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20
B1 1449.3 1092.2 861.2 704.7 594.1 512.9 451.4 403.6
B2 1268.1 955.7 753.6 616.6 519.7 448.7 394.9 353.1
C 1319.3 919.6 688.1 542.8 445.5 377.2 326.9 289.0
C1 1182.0 824.0 616.5 486.2 399.2 337.8 292.9 258.9
C2 1055.3 735.6 550.3 434.1 356.2 301.6 261.5 231.1
D&T 949.9 662.1 495.4 390.7 320.8 271.5 235.4 208.1
E 843.9 588.3 440.2 347.2 284.9 241.2 209.2 184.9
F 749.2 522.3 390.8 308.2 253.0 214.1 185.6 164.1
F1 664.8 463.4 346.7 273.5 224.5 190.0 164.7 145.6
F3 591.1 412.0 308.3 243.2 199.6 169.0 146.5 129.4
G 527.6 367.8 275.2 217.1 178.2 150.8 130.8 115.6
W1 475.0 331.0 247.8 195.4 160.4 135.8 117.7 104.0
W2 422.1 294.1 220.1 173.6 142.5 120.6 104.6 92.5
W3 379.9 264.8 198.2 156.0 128.2 108.6 94.2 83.2

Interpolated Allowable extreme stress in Mpa

S-N curves Weibull shape parameter h=1


B1 512.9
B2 448.7
C 377.2
C1 337.8
C2 301.6
D&T 271.5
E 241.2
F 214.1
F1 190
F3 169
G 150.8
W1 135.8
W2 120.6
W3 108.6

Allowable stress range value for components in air = 120.6 N/mm2

This corresponds to an allowable stress for 30 years design life and a DFF equal 1.
PROJECT NAME Integrado Parque das Baleias Development Project-FPSO
Maria Quiteria
SIMPLIFIED FATIGUE ANALYSIS DOCUMENT NO. 2023-VMEP-90-N-CA-00036

REVISION NO. C1

SIMPLIFIED FATIGUE ANALYSIS

Table 5-5 Reduction factor on stress to correspond with utilisation factor η for S-N curves in air (Clause 5-2)
environment
Weibull shape parameter h
Fatigue damage
utilisation η 0.50 6.00 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20
0.1 0.497 0.511 0.526 0.54 0.552 0.563 0.573 0.582
0.2 0.609 0.62 0.632 0.642 0.652 0.661 0.67 0.677
0.22 0.627 0.638 0.648 0.659 0.668 0.677 0.685 0.692
0.27 0.661 0.676 0.686 0.695 0.703 0.711 0.719 0.725
0.3 0.688 0.697 0.706 0.715 0.723 0.73 0.737 0.743
0.33 0.708 0.717 0.725 0.733 0.741 0.748 0.754 0.76
0.4 0.751 0.758 0.765 0.772 0.779 0.785 0.79 0.795
0.5 0.805 0.81 0.816 0.821 0.826 0.831 0.835 0.839
0.6 0.852 0.856 0.86 0.864 0.868 0.871 0.875 0.878
0.67 0.882 0.885 0.888 0.891 0.894 0.897 0.9 0.902
0.7 0.894 0.897 0.9 0.902 0.905 0.908 0.91 0.912
0.8 0.932 0.934 0.936 0.938 0.939 0.941 0.942 0.944
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Then from Table 5-5 a reduction factor is obtained by linear interpolation between the factors for h values = 1 for η= 0.67
The following reduction factor is obtained

Interpolated Reduction Factor Allowable stress range for 25 mm thick plate


B1 460.07
Fatigue damage
Weibull shape parameter h=1
utilisation η B2 402.48
0.1 0.563 C 338.35
0.2 0.661 C1 303.01
0.22 0.677 C2 270.54
0.27 0.711 D&T 243.54
0.3 0.73 E 216.36
0.33 0.748 F 192.05
0.4 0.785 F1 170.43
0.5 0.831 F3 151.59
0.6 0.871 G 135.27
0.67 0.897 W1 121.81
0.7 0.908 W2 108.18
0.8 0.941 W3 97.41
1 1

Thus the allowable stress range for a 25 mm thick plate is obtained as 120.6 x 0.897
Allowable stress range value σ0,tref = 108.18 N/mm2

S-N Curves in air:


Table 2-1 S-N curves in air
N < 107 cycles structural stress
N < 107 cycles
loga2 Fatigue limit Thickness concentration
S-N curve at exponent embedded in the
7
m1 loga1 m2 = 5.0 10 cycles *) 'k' detail (S-N class), ref.
also equation (2.3.2)
B1 4.0 15.117 17.146 106.97 0 -
B2 4.0 14.885 16.856 93.59 0 -
C 3.0 12.592 16.320 73.10 0.05 -
C1 3.0 12.449 16.081 65.50 0.10 -
C2 3.0 12.301 15.835 58.48 0.15 -
D 3.0 12.164 15.606 52.63 0.20 1.00
E 3.0 12.010 15.350 46.78 0.20 1.13
F 3.0 11.855 15.091 41.52 0.25 1.27
F1 3.0 11.699 14.832 36.84 0.25 1.43
F3 3.0 11.546 14.576 32.75 0.25 1.61
G 3.0 11.398 14.330 29.24 0.25 1.80 t ref/t =1
W1 3.0 11.261 14.101 26.32 0.25 2.00
W2 3.0 11.107 13.845 23.39 0.25 2.25
W3 3.0 10.970 13.617 21.05 0.25 2.50
0.25 for
SCF < 10.0
T 3.0 12.164 15.606 52.63
0.30 for
1.00 There is no penalty
SCF > 10.0
for thickness less
Thickness exponent for type of weld k = 0.25
than ref thickness.
Then the allowable stress range for the 22 mm thick plate σ0,t =σ0,tref (tref/t)k if t<t ref, t=t ref.
= (108.18(25/22)^0.25)
= 111.69
108.18
σ0,t = 111.69 N/mm2
PROJECT NAME Integrado Parque das Baleias Development Project-FPSO
Maria Quiteria
SIMPLIFIED FATIGUE ANALYSIS DOCUMENT NO. 2023-VMEP-90-N-CA-00036

REVISION NO. C1

SIMPLIFIED FATIGUE ANALYSIS


SCF and S-N Curves for Beam Connections with Varying thickness (butt welds in plated structures)

Detail Description
As per Table A.7 detail 7
SN Curve W1 when l ≤ 300mm (DNVGL-RP-C203)
SN Curve W2 when l > 300mm

STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTOR (SCF)


Refer RP-C203:
Stress concentartion factors for Beam Connections with varying thickness (butt welds in plated structures) Fatigue design of offshore
steel structures, 3.1.2
why not Eq.3.1.3
Fig3-1?

T = thickness of the thicker plate = 25

t = thickness of the thinner plate = 22

= min( 0.15T, 0.15t) = 3.3 (Misalignment of the plates) Refer DNVGL-OS-C401

= 0.05t = 1.1 (Misalignment inherent in S-N curves)

= 0.5(T-t) = 1.5 (Eccentricity due to the change of thickness)

Stress Concentration Factor (SCF) = 1.46

Actual Stress Value from SACS Analysis, Smax = 33.48 N/mm2

Actual stress range value = 48.76 N/mm2 SCF*(Smax )

2
Allowable stress range value = 111.69 N/mm

(Ratio of available stress to allowable stress) = 0.44 < 1

HENCE, SAFE

You might also like