CMOS Amplifiers-2
CMOS Amplifiers-2
CMOS Amplifiers
Most CMOS amplifiers have identical bipolar counterparts and can therefore be analyzed
in the same fashion. Our study in this chapter parallels the developments in Chapter 5,
identifying both similarities and differences between CMOS and bipolar circuit topologies.
It is recommended that the reader review Chapter 5, specifically, Section 5.1. We assume
the reader is familiar with concepts such as I/O impedances, biasing, and dc and small-signal
analysis. The outline of the chapter is shown below.
7.1.2 Biasing
Depending on the application, MOS circuits may incorporate biasing techniques that are
quite different from those described in Chapter 5 for bipolar stages. Most of these tech-
niques are beyond the scope of this book and some methods are studied in Chapter 5.
Nonetheless, it is still instructive to apply some of the biasing concepts of Chapter 5 to
MOS stages.
309
310 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
VDD = 1.8 V
4 kΩ R1 RD
Y
ID
X M1
10 k Ω R2 RS 1 kΩ
Consider the circuit shown in Fig. 7.1, where the gate voltage is defined by R1 and
R2 . We assume M1 operates in saturation. Also, in most bias calculations, we can neglect
channel-length modulation. Noting that the gate current is zero, we have
R2
VX = VDD . (7.1)
R1 + R 2
Since VX = VGS + ID RS ,
R2
VDD = VGS + ID RS . (7.2)
R1 + R 2
Also,
1 W
ID = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 . (7.3)
2 L
Equations (7.2) and (7.3) can be solved to obtain ID and VGS , either by iteration or by
finding ID from Eq. (7.2) and replacing for it in Eq. (7.3):
! "
R2 1 1 W
VDD − VGS = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 . (7.4)
R1 + R 2 RS 2 L
That is,
#
2R2
VGS = −(V1 − VTH ) + (V1 − VTH )2 − VTH
2
+ V1 VDD , (7.5)
R1 + R 2
# ! "
R2 VDD
= −(V1 − VTH ) + V12 + 2V1 − VTH , (7.6)
R1 + R 2
where
1
V1 = . (7.7)
W
µnCox RS
L
This value of VGS can then be substituted in Eq. (7.2) to obtain ID . Of course, VY must
exceed VX − VTH to ensure operation in the saturation region.
Example Determine the bias current of M1 in Fig. 7.1 assuming VTH = 0.5 V, µnCox =
7.1 100 µA/V2 , W/L = 5/0.18, and λ = 0. What is the maximum allowable value of RD
for M1 to remain in saturation?
7.1 General Considerations 311
Solution We have
R2
VX = VDD (7.8)
R1 + R 2
= 1.286 V. (7.9)
With an initial guess VGS = 1 V, the voltage drop across RS can be expressed as
VX − VGS = 286 mV, yielding a drain current of 286 µA. Substituting for ID in
Eq. (7.3) gives the new value of VGS as
$
%
% 2ID
VGS = VTH + % (7.10)
& W
µnCox
L
= 0.954 V. (7.11)
Consequently,
VX − VGS
ID = (7.12)
RS
= 332 µA, (7.13)
and hence
and
VX − VGS
ID = (7.16)
RS
= 312 µA. (7.17)
Example In the circuit of Example 7.1, assume M1 is in saturation and RD = 2.5 k" and compute
7.2 (a) the maximum allowable value of W/L and (b) the minimum allowable value of RS
(with W/L = 5/0.18). Assume λ = 0.
Solution (a) As W/L becomes larger, M1 can carry a larger current for a given VGS . With
RD = 2.5 k" and VX = 1.286 V, the maximum allowable value of ID is given by
VDD − VY
ID = (7.20)
RD
= 406 µA. (7.21)
The voltage drop across RS is then equal to 406 mV, yielding VGS = 1.286 V−
0.406 V = 0.88 V. In other words, M1 must carry a current of 406 µA with VGS = 0.88 V:
1 W
ID = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 (7.22)
2 L
W
406 µA = (50 µA/V2 ) (0.38 V)2 ; (7.23)
L
thus,
W
= 56.2. (7.24)
L
(b) With W/L = 5/0.18, the minimum allowable value of RS gives a drain current of
406 µA. Since
$
%
% 2ID
VGS = VTH + % (7.25)
& W
µnCox
L
= 1.041 V, (7.26)
the voltage drop across RS is equal to VX − VGS = 245 mV. It follows that
VX − VGS
RS = (7.27)
ID
= 604 ". (7.28)
The self-biasing technique of Fig. 5.22 can also be applied to MOS amplifiers. Depicted
in Fig. 7.2, the circuit can be analyzed by noting that M1 is in saturation (why?) and the
voltage drop across RG is zero. Thus,
Finding VGS from this equation and substituting it in Eq. (7.3), we have
1 W
ID = µnCox [VDD − (RS + RD )ID − VTH ]2 , (7.30)
2 L
7.1 General Considerations 313
VDD
RD
RG
ID
M1
RS
Example Calculate the drain current of M1 in Fig. 7.3 if µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, and
7.3 λ = 0. What value of RD is necessary to reduce ID by a factor of two?
VDD = 1.8 V
RD 1 kΩ
20 k Ω
W 5
M 1 L = 0.18
200 Ω
Figure 7.4 (a) NMOS device operating as a current source, (b) PMOS device operating as a
current source, (c) PMOS topology not operating as a current source, (d) NMOS topology not
operating as a current source.
[Fig. 7.4(b)] draws current from VDD to node Y. If λ = 0, these currents remain indepen-
dent of VX or VY (so long as the transistors are in saturation).
It is important to understand that only the drain terminal of a MOSFET can draw a dc
current and still present a high impedance. Specifically, NMOS or PMOS devices configured
as shown in Figs. 7.4(c) and (d) do not operate as current sources because variation of
VX or VY directly changes the gate-source voltage of each transistor, thus changing the
drain current considerably. From another perspective, the small-signal model of these
two structures is identical to that of the diode-connected devices in Fig. 6.34, revealing a
small-signal impedance of only 1/gm (if λ = 0) rather than infinity.
vout
= −gmRD , (7.34)
vin
a result similar to that obtained for the common emitter stage in Chapter 5.
VDD
RD v in v out
Vout v1 g v1 RD
ID m
Output Sensed
V in M1 at Drain
Input Applied
to Gate
(a) (b)
- The voltage gain of the CS stage is also limited by the supply voltage. Since gm =
2µnCox (W/L)ID , we have
.
W
Av = − 2µnCox ID RD , (7.35)
L
concluding that if ID or RD is increased, so is the voltage drop across RD ( = ID RD ).1 For
M1 to remain in saturation,
Example Calculate the small-signal voltage gain of the CS stage shown in Fig. 7.6 if ID = 1 mA,
7.4 µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, and λ = 0. Verify that M1 operates in saturation.
VDD = 1.8 V
RD 1 kΩ
v out
10
v in M1 W =
L 0.18
Solution We have
.
W
gm = 2µnCox ID (7.38)
L
1
= . (7.39)
300 "
Thus,
Av = −gmRD (7.40)
= 3.33. (7.41)
To check the operation region, we first determine the gate-source voltage:
$
%
% 2ID
VGS = VTH + % (7.42)
& W
µnCox
L
= 1.1 V. (7.43)
1
It is possible to raise the gain to some extent by increasing W, but “subthreshold conduction” eventually
limits the transconductance. This concept is beyond the scope of this book.
316 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
The drain voltage is equal to VDD − RD ID = 0.8 V. Since VGS − VTH = 0.6 V, the device
indeed operates in saturation and has a margin of 0.2 V with respect to the triode region.
For example, if RD is doubled with the intention of doubling Av , then M1 enters the
triode region and its transconductance drops.
Since the gate terminal of MOSFETs draws a zero current (at very low frequencies),
we say the CS amplifier provides a current gain of infinity. By contrast, the current gain of
a common-emitter stage is equal to β.
Let us now compute the I/O impedances of the CS amplifier. Since the gate current is
zero (at low frequencies),
Rin = ∞, (7.44)
a point of contrast to the CE stage (whose Rin is equal to rπ ). The high input impedance
of the CS topology plays a critical role in many analog circuits.
The similarity between the small-signal equivalents of CE and CS stages indicates that
the output impedance of the CS amplifier is simply equal to
Rout = RD . (7.45)
This is also seen from Fig. 7.7.
iX
v1 g v1 RD vX
m
Rin = ∞ (7.47)
iX
v1 g v1 rO RD vX
m
Example Assuming M1 operates in saturation, determine the voltage gain of the circuit depicted
7.5 in Fig. 7.9(a) and plot the result as a function of the transistor channel length while other
parameters remain constant.
VDD
Av
v out
v in M1
L
(a) (b)
Figure 7.9 (a) CS stage with ideal current source as a load, (b) gain as a function of device
channel length.
Solution The ideal current source presents an infinite small-signal resistance, allowing the use of
Eq. (7.46) with RD = ∞:
Av = −gmrO . (7.49)
This is the highest voltage gain that a single transistor can provide. Writing gm =
-
2µnCox (W/L)ID and rO = (λID )−1 , we have
.
W
2µnCox
L
|Av | = √ . (7.50)
λ ID
This result may imply that |Av | falls as L increases, but recall from Chapter 6 that λ ∝ L−1 :
#
2µnCox WL
|Av | ∝ . (7.51)
ID
Consequently, |Av | increases with L [Fig. 7.9(b)].
Exercise Repeat the above example if a resistor of value R1 is tied between the gate and drain of M1 .
VDD VDD
Vb v1 gm2v 1 r O2
M2
v out
v out
v in M1 v in r O1
M1
(a) (b)
Figure 7.10 (a) CS stage using a PMOS device as a current source, (b) small-signal model.
output impedance [Fig. 7.10(b)] because v1 = 0 and hence gm2 v1 = 0. Thus, the drain node
of M1 sees both rO1 and rO2 to ac ground. Equations (7.46) and (7.48) give
Av = −gm1 (rO1 ||rO2 ) (7.52)
Rout = rO1 ||rO2 . (7.53)
Example Figure 7.11 shows a PMOS CS stage using an NMOS current source load. Compute the
7.6 voltage gain of the circuit.
VDD
v in M2
v out
Vb M1
Solution Transistor M2 generates a small-signal current equal to gm2 vin , which then flows through
rO1 ||rO2 , producing vout = −gm2 vin (rO1 ||rO2 ). Thus,
Av = −gm2 (rO1 ||rO2 ). (7.54)
Exercise Calculate the gain if the circuit drives a loads resistance equal to RL .
VDD VCC
1
M2 Q2 g m2 r O2
Vout Vout
v out
V in M1 V in Q1 v in r O1
M1
Figure 7.12 (a) MOS stage using a diode-connected load, (b) bipolar counterpart,
(c) simplified circuit of (a).
Interestingly, the gain is given by the dimensions of M1 and M2 and remains independent
of process parameters µn and Cox and the drain current, ID .
The reader may wonder why we did not consider a common-emitter stage with a diode-
connected load in Chapter 5. Shown in Fig. 7.12(b), such a circuit is not used because it
provides a voltage gain of only unity:
1
Av = −gm1 · (7.58)
gm2
IC 1 1
=− · (7.59)
VT IC 2 /VT
≈ −1. (7.60)
The contrast between Eqs. (7.57) and (7.60) arises from a fundamental difference between
MOS and bipolar devices: transconductance of the former depends on device dimensions
whereas that of the latter does not.
A more accurate expression for the gain of the stage in Fig. 7.12(a) must take channel-
length modulation into account. As depicted in Fig. 7.12(c), the resistance seen at the drain
is now equal to (1/gm2 )||rO2 ||rO1 , and hence
! "
1
Av = −gm1 ||rO2 ||rO1 . (7.61)
gm2
Similarly, the output resistance of the stage is given by
1
Rout = ||rO2 ||rO1 . (7.62)
gm2
Example Determine the voltage gain of the circuit shown in Fig. 7.13(a) if λ &= 0.
7.7
VDD
V in M2
Vout
M1
Solution This stage is similar to that in Fig. 7.12(a), but with NMOS devices changed to PMOS
transistors: M1 serves as a common-source device and M2 as a diode-connected load.
Thus,
! "
1
Av = −gm2 ||rO1 ||rO2 . (7.63)
gm1
Exercise Repeat the above example if the gate of M1 is tied to a constant voltage equal to
0.5 V.
VDD
RD v in v out
Vout v1 g v1 RD
m
V in M1
RS
RS
(a) (b)
Figure 7.14 depicts the stage along with its small-signal equivalent (if λ = 0). As with
the bipolar counterpart, the degeneration resistor sustains a fraction of the input voltage
change. From Fig. 7.14(b), we have
and hence
vin
v1 = . (7.65)
1 + gmRS
vout gmRD
=− (7.66)
vin 1 + gmRS
RD
=− , (7.67)
1
+ RS
gm
a result identical to that expressed by Eq. (5.157) for the bipolar counterpart.
7.2 Common-Source Stage 321
Example Compute the voltage gain of the circuit shown in Fig. 7.15(a) if λ = 0.
7.8
VDD
RD RD
Vout v out
V in M1 v in M1
1
M2 g m2
(a) (b)
Figure 7.15 (a) Example of CS stage with degeneration, (b) simplified circuit.
In parallel with the developments in Chapter 5, we may study the effect of a resistor
appearing in series with the gate (Fig. 7.16). However, since the gate current is zero (at
low frequencies), RG sustains no voltage drop and does not affect the voltage gain or the
I/O impedances.
Effect of Transistor Output Impedance As with the bipolar counterparts, the inclusion
of the transistor output impedance complicates the analysis and is studied in Problem 7.32.
Nonetheless, the output impedance of the degenerated CS stage plays a critical role in
analog design and is worth studying here.
Figure 7.17 shows the small-signal equivalent of the circuit. Since RS carries a cur-
rent equal to iX (why?), we have v1 = −iX RS . Also, the current through rO is equal to
VDD
RD
Vout
RG
V in M1
RS
iX
v1 g v1 rO vX
m
RS
and hence
vX
= rO (1 + gmRS ) + RS (7.70)
iX
= (1 + gmrO )RS + rO (7.71)
≈ gmrO RS + rO . (7.72)
Alternatively, we observe that the model in Fig. 7.17 is similar to its bipolar counterpart in
Fig. 5.46(a) but with rπ = ∞. Letting rπ → ∞ in Eqs. (5.196) and (5.197) yields the same
results as above. As expected from our study of the bipolar degenerated stage, the MOS
version also exhibits a “boosted” output impedance.
Example Compute the output resistance of the circuit in Fig. 7.18(a) if M1 and M2 are identical.
7.9
R out R out
Vb M1 r O1
M1
1
M2 r
g m2 O2
(a) (b)
Figure 7.18 (a) Example of CS stage with degeneration, (b) simplified circuit.
Exercise Do the results remain unchanged if M2 is replaced with a diode-connected PMOS device?
Example Determine the output resistance of the circuit in Fig. 7.19(a) and compare the result with
7.10 that in the above example. Assume M1 and M2 are in saturation.
R out R out
V b2 M1 r O1
M1
V b1 M2 r O2
(a) (b)
Figure 7.19 (a) Example of CS stage with degeneration, (b) simplified circuit.
Solution With its gate-source voltage fixed, transistor M2 operates as a current source, introducing
a resistance of rO2 from the source of M1 to ground [Fig. 7.19(b)].
Equation (7.71) can therefore be written as
We observe that this value is quite higher than that in Eq. (7.75).
Exercise Repeat the above example for the PMOS counterpart of the circuit.
RD RD RD
R1 R1 R1
Vout Vout Vout
C1 RG C1 RG C1
V in M1 V in M1 V in M1
R2 R2 R2
RS RS R in RS C2
Figure 7.20 (a) CS stage with input coupling capacitor, (b) inclusion of gate resistance, (c) use of
bypass capacitor.
Thus, if the circuit is driven by a finite source impedance [Fig. 7.20(b)], the voltage gain
falls to
R1 ||R2 −RD
Av = · , (7.80)
RG + R1 ||R2 1
+ RS
gm
where λ is assumed to be zero.
As mentioned in Chapter 5, it is possible to utilize degeneration for bias point stability
but eliminate its effect on the small-signal performance by means of a bypass capacitor
[Fig. 7.20(c)]. Unlike the case of bipolar realization, this does not alter the input impedance
of the CS stage:
Rin = R1 ||R2 , (7.81)
but raises the voltage gain:
R1 ||R2
Av = − gmRD . (7.82)
RG + R1 ||R2
Example Design the CS stage of Fig. 7.20(c) for a voltage gain of 5, an input impedance of 50 k",
7.11 and a power budget of 5 mW. Assume µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, λ = 0, and
VDD = 1.8 V. Also, assume a voltage drop of 400 mV across RS .
Solution The power budget along with VDD = 1.8 V implies a maximum supply current of
2.78 mA. As an initial guess, we allocate 2.7 mA to M1 and the remaining 80 µA to
R1 and R2 . It follows that
RS = 148 ". (7.83)
As with typical design problems, the choice of gm and RD is somewhat flexible so
long as gmRD = 5. However, with ID known, we must ensure a reasonable value for VGS ,
e.g., VGS = 1 V. This choice yields
2ID
gm = (7.84)
VGS − VTH
1
= , (7.85)
92.6 "
7.3 Common-Gate Stage 325
and hence
RD = 463 ". (7.86)
Writing
1 W
ID = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 (7.87)
2 L
gives
W
= 216. (7.88)
L
With VGS = 1 V and a 400-mV drop across RS , the gate voltage reaches 1.4 V, requiring
that
R2
VDD = 1.4 V, (7.89)
R1 + R 2
which, along with Rin = R1 ||R2 = 50 k", yields
R1 = 64.3 k" (7.90)
R2 = 225 k". (7.91)
We must now check to verify that M1 indeed operates in saturation. The drain
voltage is given by VDD − ID RD = 1.8 V − 1.25 V = 0.55 V. Since the gate voltage is
equal to 1.4 V, the gate-drain voltage difference exceeds VTH , driving M1 into the triode
region!
How did our design procedure lead to this result? For the given ID , we have cho-
sen an excessively large RD , i.e., an excessively small gm (because gmRD = 5), even
though VGS is reasonable. We must therefore increase gm so as to allow a lower value
for RD . For example, suppose we halve RD and double gm by increasing W/L by a factor
of four:
W
= 864 (7.92)
L
1
gm = . (7.93)
46.3 "
The corresponding gate-source voltage is obtained from (7.84):
VGS = 250 mV, (7.94)
yielding a gate voltage of 650 mV.
Is M1 in saturation? The drain voltage is equal to VDD − RD ID = 1.17 V, a value
higher than the gate voltage minus VTH . Thus, M1 operates in saturation.
Exercise Repeat the above example for a power budget of 3 mW and VDD = 1.2 V.
VDD
RD
Vout
M1 Vb Output Sensed
V in at Drain
Input Applied
to Source
raising Vout by gm%VRD . That is, the voltage gain is positive and equal to
Av = gmRD . (7.95)
The CG stage suffers from voltage headroom-gain trade-offs similar to those of the
CB topology. In particular, to achieve a high gain, a high ID or RD is necessary, but the
drain voltage, VDD − ID RD , must remain above Vb − VTH to ensure M1 is saturated.
Example A microphone having a dc level of zero drives a CG stage biased at ID = 0.5 mA. If
7.12 W/L = 50, µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, and VDD = 1.8 V, determine the maxi-
mum allowable value of RD and hence the maximum voltage gain. Neglect channel-
length modulation.
Solution With W/L known, the gate-source voltage can be determined from
1 W
ID = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 (7.96)
2 L
as
and hence
Also, the above value of W/L and ID yield gm = (447 ")−1 and
Av ≤ 6.06. (7.100)
Figure 7.22 summarizes the allowable signal levels in this design. The gate voltage can
be generated using a resistive divider similar to that in Fig. 7.20(a).
VDD
RD
Vb = 0.947 V
Vout
Vb – V TH = 0.447 V
M1
0 V in
1 RD + rO
Rin = , (7.103) Ri n =
gm 1 + gm r O
a relatively low value. Also, from Fig. which reduces to 1/gm if gm r O ( 1 and R D * r O .
7.23(b), v1 = 0 and hence Since neither of these conditions holds anymore,
the CG stage presents new challenges to RF
Rout = RD , (7.104) designers.
iX
v1 g v1 RD v1 g v1 RD vX
m m
iX
vX
(a) (b)
VDD
RD
Vout
RS M1 Vb RS vX
X
1
v in v in
1 gm
gm
Thus,
vout vout vX
= · (7.107)
vin vX vin
gmRD
= (7.108)
1 + gmRS
RD
= . (7.109)
1
+ RS
gm
The gain is therefore equal to that of the degenerated CS stage except for a negative sign.
In contrast to the common-source stage, the CG amplifier exhibits a current gain of
unity: the current provided by the input voltage source simply flows through the channel
and emerges from the drain node.
The analysis of the common-gate stage in the general case, i.e., including both channel-
length modulation and a finite source impedance, is beyond the scope of this book
(Problem 7.42). However, we can make two observations. First, a resistance appearing
in series with the gate terminal [Fig. 7.25(a)] does not alter the gain or I/O impedances
(at low frequencies) because it sustains a zero potential drop—as if its value were zero.
Second, the output resistance of the CG stage in the general case [Fig. 7.25(b)] is identical
to that of the degenerated CS topology:
VDD
RD R out
Vout
Vb rO
M1 RS
RG M1
v in
(a) (b)
Figure 7.25 (a) CG stage with gate resistance, (b) output resistance of CG stage.
7.3 Common-Gate Stage 329
Example For the circuit shown in Fig. 7.26(a), calculate the voltage gain if λ = 0 and the output
7.13 impedance if λ > 0.
VDD
R out1
RD
Vout 1
g m1 r O1
Vb RS
RS M 1 RS
vX M1
X
1 1
V in M2 v in r
g m2 g m2 O2
Figure 7.26 (a) Example of CG stage, (b) equivalent input network, (c) calculation of output
resistance.
Solution We first compute vX /vin with the aid of the equivalent circuit depicted in Fig. 7.26(b):
//
1 //// 1
vX gm2 // gm1
= // (7.111)
vin 1 //// 1
+ RS
gm2 // gm1
1
= . (7.112)
1 + (gm1 + gm2 )RS
vout gm1 RD
= . (7.113)
vin 1 + (gm1 + gm2 )RS
To compute the output impedance, we first consider Rout1 , as shown in Fig. 7.26(c),
which from Eq. (7.110) is equal to
! "
1
Rout1 = (1 + gm1rO1 ) ||rO2 ||RS + rO1 (7.114)
gm2
! "
1
≈ gm1rO1 ||RS + rO1 . (7.115)
gm2
Exercise Calculate the output impedance if the gate of M2 is tied to a constant voltage.
330 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
VDD
RD
R1
Vout
M1
RS
V in X
R2
C1
R3
Since the impedance seen to the right of node X is equal to R3 ||(1/gm), we have
vout vX vout
= · (7.118)
vin vin vX
R3 ||(1/gm)
= · gmRD , (7.119)
R3 ||(1/gm) + RS
Example Design the common-gate stage of Fig. 7.27 for the following parameters: vout /
7.14 vin = 5, RS = 0, R3 = 500 ", 1/gm = 50 ", power budget = 2 mW, VDD = 1.8 V. Assume
µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, and λ = 0.
Solution From the power budget, we obtain a total supply current of 1.11 mA. Allocating 10 µA
to the voltage divider, R1 and R2 , we leave 1.1 mA for the drain current of M1 . Thus, the
voltage drop across R3 is equal to 550 mV.
We must now compute two interrelated parameters: W/L and RD . A larger value of
W/L yields a greater gm, allowing a lower value of RD . As in Example 7.11, we choose an
initial value for VGS to arrive at a reasonable guess for W/L. For example, if VGS = 0.8 V,
then W/L = 244, and gm = 2ID /(VGS − VTH ) = (136.4 ")−1 , dictating RD = 682 " for
vout /vin = 5.
Let us determine whether M1 operates in saturation. The gate voltage is equal to
VGS plus the drop across R3 , amounting to 1.35 V. On the other hand, the drain voltage is
given by VDD − ID RD = 1.05 V. Since the drain voltage exceeds VG − VTH , M1 is indeed
in saturation.
7.4 Source Follower 331
The resistive divider consisting of R1 and R2 must establish a gate voltage equal to
1.35 V while drawing 10 µA:
VDD
= 10 µA (7.120)
R1 + R 2
R2
VDD = 1.35 V. (7.121)
R1 + R 2
It follows that R1 = 45 k" and R2 = 135 k".
Exercise If W/L cannot exceed 100, what voltage gain can be achieved?
Example Suppose in Example 7.14, we wish to minimize W/L (and hence transistor capacitances).
7.15 What is the minimum acceptable value of W/L?
Solution For a given ID , as W/L decreases, VGS − VTH increases. Thus, we must first compute the
maximum allowable VGS . We impose the condition for saturation as
VDD − ID RD > VGS + VR3 − VTH , (7.122)
where VR3 denotes the voltage drop across R3 , and set gmRD to the required gain:
2ID
RD = Av . (7.123)
VGS − VTH
Eliminating RD from Eqs. (7.122) and (7.123) gives:
Av
VDD − (VGS − VTH ) > VGS − VTH + VR3 (7.124)
2
and hence
VDD − VR3
VGS − VTH < . (7.125)
Av
+1
2
In other words,
2ID
W/L > ! "2 . (7.126)
VDD − VR3
µnCox 2
Av + 2
It follows that
W/L > 172.5. (7.127)
VDD
V in M1
Also,
It follows that
vout gm(rO ||RL )
= (7.130)
vin 1 + gm(rO ||RL )
rO ||RL
= . (7.131)
1
+ rO ||RL
gm
The voltage gain is therefore positive and less than unity. It is desirable to maximize RL
(and rO ).
As with emitter followers, we can view the above result as voltage division between
a resistance equal to 1/gm and another equal to rO ||RL [Fig. 7.29(b)]. Note, however, that
a resistance placed in series with the gate does not affect Eq. (7.131) (at low frequencies)
because it sustains a zero drop.
1
v1 g v1 gm
v in m rO
v out
v out v in RL r O
RL
(a) (b)
Figure 7.29 (a) Small-signal equivalent of source follower, (b) simplified circuit.
7.4 Source Follower 333
Example A source follower is realized as shown in Fig. 7.30(a), where M2 serves as a current
7.16 source. Calculate the voltage gain of the circuit.
VDD
V in M1 V in r O1
M1
Vout Vout
Vb M2 r O2
(a) (b)
Figure 7.30 (a) Follower with ideal current source, (b) simplified circuit.
Solution Since M2 simply presents an impedance of rO2 from the output node to ac ground
[Fig. 7.30(b)], we substitute RL = rO2 in Eq. (7.131):
rO1 ||rO2
Av = . (7.132)
1
+ rO1 ||rO2
gm1
If rO1 ||rO2 ( 1/gm1 , then Av ≈ 1.
Exercise Repeat the above example if a resistance of value RS is placed in series with the source of
M2 .
Example Design a source follower to drive a 50-" load with a voltage gain of 0.5 and a power
7.17 budget of 10 mW. Assume µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, λ = 0, and VDD = 1.8 V.
RL
Av = (7.133)
1
+ RL
gm
and hence
1
gm = . (7.134)
50 "
The power budget and supply - voltage yield a maximum supply current of 5.56 mA.
Using this value for ID in gm = 2µnCox (W/L)ID gives
Exercise What voltage gain can be achieved if the power budget is raised to 15 mW?
334 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
rO
rO
M1
M1
1
rO
RL gm
R out
RL
1
≈ ||RL . (7.137)
gm
In summary, the source follower exhibits a very high input impedance and a relatively
low output impedance, thereby providing buffering capability.
VDD
RG
C1
V in M1
C2
Vout
RS
Figure 7.32 Source follower with input and output coupling capacitors.
2
The input impedance is infinite at low frequencies.
7.4 Source Follower 335
1 W
ID = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 (7.139)
2 L
1 W
= µnCox (VDD − ID RS − VTH )2 . (7.140)
2 L
The resulting quadratic equation can be solved to obtain ID .
Example Design the source follower of Fig. 7.32 for a drain current of 1 mA and a voltage gain of
7.18 0.8. Assume µnCox = 100 µA/V2 , VTH = 0.5 V, λ = 0, VDD = 1.8 V, and RG = 50 k".
Solution The unknowns in this problem are VGS , W/L, and RS . The following three equations can
be formed:
1 W
ID = µnCox (VGS − VTH )2 (7.141)
2 L
ID RS + VGS = VDD (7.142)
RS
Av = . (7.143)
1
+ RS
gm
If gm is written as 2ID /(VGS − VTH ), then Eqs. (7.142) and (7.143) do not contain
W/L and can be solved to determine VGS and RS . With the aid of Eq. (7.142), we write
Eq. (7.143) as
RS
Av = (7.144)
VGS − VTH
+ RS
2ID
2ID RS
= (7.145)
VGS − VTH + 2ID RS
2ID RS
= . (7.146)
VDD − VTH + ID RS
Thus,
VDD − VTH Av
RS = (7.147)
ID 2 − Av
= 867 ". (7.148)
and
VGS = VDD − ID RS (7.149)
Av
= VDD − (VDD − VTH ) (7.150)
2 − Av
= 0.933 V. (7.151)
336 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
Exercise What voltage gain can be achieved if W/L cannot exceed 50?
Equation (7.140) reveals that the bias current of the source follower varies with the
supply voltage. To avoid this effect, integrated circuits bias the follower by means of a
current source (Fig. 7.33).
VDD VDD
RG RG
C1 C1
V in M1 V in M1
C2 C2
Vout Vout
Vb M2
Example Calculate the voltage gain and output impedance of the circuit shown in Fig. 7.34(a).
7.19
VDD
V in M1 v in r O1
M1
Vout
v out
Vb 1
M2 M3 r O2 r
g m3 O3
(a) (b)
Solution We identify M1 as a common-source device because it senses the input at its gate and
generates the output at its drain. Transistors M2 and M3 therefore act as the load,
with the former serving as a current source and the latter as a diode-connected de-
vice. Thus, M2 can be replaced with a small-signal resistance equal to rO2 , and M3 with
another equal to (1/gm3 )||rO3 . The circuit now reduces to that depicted in Fig. 7.34(b),
yielding
! "
1
Av = −gm1 ||rO1 ||rO2 ||rO3 (7.153)
gm3
and
1
Rout = ||rO1 ||rO2 ||rO3 . (7.154)
gm3
Example Compute the voltage gain of the circuit shown in Fig. 7.35(a). Neglect channel-length
7.20 modulation in M1 .
VDD
M3 1
r
g m3 O3
V in M1 V in M1
Vout Vout
Vb M2 r O2
(a) (b)
Exercise Repeat the above example if the gate of M3 is tied to a constant voltage.
338 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
Example Determine the voltage gain of the amplifiers illustrated in Fig. 7.36. For simplicity, assume
7.21 rO1 = ∞ in Fig. 7.36(b).
VDD VDD
V in M2 V b2 M2
Vout Vout
Vb M1 V b1 M1
RS RS
V in
(b)
(a)
Example Calculate the voltage gain of the circuit shown in Fig. 7.37(a) if λ = 0.
7.22
VDD
RD RD
Vout v out
1
V in M1 M2 Vb g m1 M 2
I1 v in
(a) (b)
Solution In this circuit, M1 operates as a source follower and M2 as a CG stage (why?). A simple
method of analyzing the circuit is to replace vin and M1 with a Thevenin equivalent.
From Fig. 7.29(b), we derive the model depicted in Fig. 7.37(b). Thus,
RD
Av = . (7.158)
1 1
+
gm1 gm2
Exercise What happens if a resistance of value R1 is placed in series with the drain of M1?
Example The circuit of Fig. 7.38 produces two outputs. Calculate the voltage gain from the input
7.23 to Y and to X. Assume λ = 0 for M1 .
VDD
Vb M3
M4
Vout2
Y
V in M1
X Vout1
M2
Solution For Vout1 , the circuit serves as a source follower. The reader can show that if rO1 = ∞,
then M3 and M4 do not affect the source follower operation. Exhibiting a small-
signal impedance of (1/gm2 )||rO2 , transistor M2 acts as a load for the follower, yielding
from Eq. (7.131)
1
||rO2
vout1 gm2
= . (7.159)
vin 1 1
||rO2 +
gm2 gm1
For Vout2 , M1 operates as a degenerated CS stage with a drain load consisting of the
diode-connected device M3 and the current source M4 . This load impedance is equal to
(1/gm3 )||rO3 ||rO4 , resulting in
1
||rO3 ||rO4
vout2 gm3
=− . (7.160)
vin 1 1
+ ||rO2
gm1 gm2
Exercise Which one of the two gains is higher? Explain intuitively why.
340 Chapter 7 CMOS Amplifiers
PROBLEMS
M1 VDD = 1.8 V
10 k Ω 1 kΩ
Figure 7.39
M1
7.2. We wish to design the circuit of Fig. 7.40 for
100 Ω
a drain current of 1 mA. If W/L = 20/0.18,
compute R1 and R2 such that the input
impedance is at least 20 k". Figure 7.41