REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PRODUCTION PART
APPROVAL PROCESS
(PPAP)

Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)

First Edition Issued February 1993
Second Edition, 1st Printing, February 1995; 2nd Printing, July 1995
Third Edition, September 1999; 2nd Printing, August 2000
Fourth Edition, March 2006
Copyright ©1993, ©1995, ©1997, ©1999, ©2000, ©2006
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)

First Edition Issued February 1993
Second Edition, 1st Printing, February 1995; 2nd Printing, July 1995
Third Edition, September 1999; 2nd Printing, August 2000
Fourth Edition, March 2006
Copyright ©1993, ©1995, ©1997, ©1999, ©2000, ©2006
DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation

Effective June 1, 2006, PPAP Fourth Edition replaces PPAP Third Edition
unless otherwise specified by your customer.

Further copies are obtainable from AIAG at +1-248-358-3003 or

AdareCarwin (UK) in Europe +44-1-708-861333

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

FOREWORD TO THE FOURTH EDITION

Effective June 1, 2006, PPAP Fourth Edition replaces PPAP Third Edition, unless otherwise specified by
your customer.
Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) is updated to the 4th edition to incorporate the customer
focused process approach associated with ISO/TS 16949:2002 and other changes listed below to update
requirements.
PPAP’s purpose continues to be to provide the evidence that all customer engineering design record and
specification requirements are properly understood by the organization and that the manufacturing
process has the potential to produce product consistently meeting these requirements during an actual
production run at the quoted production rate.
PPAP 4th Edition includes the following changes:
• Alignment of PPAP to the ISO/TS 16949:2002 process approach, including:
Š Aligning the order of the PPAP requirements with the automotive product development and
manufacturing process
Š Inclusion of an example process flow for PPAP
• Relocation of Customer Specific Instructions to appropriate websites, (e.g. OEM and IAOB,
www.iaob.org) to provide current requirements
• Update of Truck OEM requirements and moved to Appendix H
• Revised PSW (Part Submission Warrant) to:
Š Provide a more logical flow for the part / design description fields
Š Make the supplier address fields applicable to international locations
Š Include IMDS materials reporting to indicate reporting status
• Updated specific PPAP requirements, including:
Š Materials reporting and polymeric identification requirements in the design record
Š Process capability index usage (Cpk and Ppk)
Š The definition and approval of catalog parts and the definition of black box parts
• Modified customer notification and submission requirements to align with OEM requirements
(e.g., I.3.3 from PPAP 3rd removed)
• Clarified and commonized Appendices C, D, and E to match the PPAP reporting requirements
• Revised Tire Appendix to allow OEM specification of applicability and to eliminate duplications
with allowances already provided in the PPAP requirements
Note: The Tire Appendix is not applicable to organizations supplying tires to Ford Motor Company.
• Reorganized and updated Appendix F to stress the importance of the Bulk Materials Checklist
Note: Ford Motor Company requires all organizations supplying bulk material to Ford Motor Company to
comply with PPAP.
• Revised Glossary to be consistent with the updates in the text
PPAP refers to the following reference manuals: Advanced Product Quality Planning & Control Plan,
Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, Measurement System Analysis, and Statistical
Process Control. These manuals are authored by DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company,
and General Motors Corporation and are available through the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG)
at www.aiag.org.
The Supplier Quality Requirements Task Force gratefully acknowledges the contributions of the many
individuals and their respective companies that participated in the revision process.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition i Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition ii Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................................1
Purpose .................................................................................................................................................................1
Applicability..........................................................................................................................................................1
Approach...............................................................................................................................................................1
SECTION 1 – GENERAL .........................................................................................................................................3
1.1 Submission of PPAP ................................................................................................................................3
SECTION 2 – PPAP PROCESS REQUIREMENTS.................................................................................................3
2.1 Significant Production Run......................................................................................................................3
2.2 PPAP Requirements.................................................................................................................................3
2.2.1 Design Record ......................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.2.2 Authorized Engineering Change documents ........................................................................................................... 5
2.2.3 Customer Engineering Approval ............................................................................................................................. 5
2.2.4 Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Design FMEA)................................................................................... 5
2.2.5 Process Flow Diagram(s) ........................................................................................................................................ 5
2.2.6 Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Process FMEA) ................................................................................. 5
2.2.7 Control Plan............................................................................................................................................................. 5
2.2.8 Measurement System Analysis Studies ................................................................................................................... 6
2.2.9 Dimensional Results................................................................................................................................................ 6
2.2.10 Records of Material / Performance Test Results ................................................................................................... 6
2.2.11 Initial Process Studies............................................................................................................................................ 7
2.2.12 Qualified Laboratory Documentation.................................................................................................................. 10
2.2.13 Appearance Approval Report (AAR) .................................................................................................................. 10
2.2.14 Sample Production Parts...................................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.15 Master Sample..................................................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.16 Checking Aids ..................................................................................................................................................... 11
2.2.17 Customer-Specific Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 11
2.2.18 Part Submission Warrant (PSW) ......................................................................................................................... 11
SECTION 3 – CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS .....................................13
3.1 Customer Notification.................................................................................................................................13
3.2 Submission to Customer..............................................................................................................................15
SECTION 4 – SUBMISSION TO CUSTOMER - LEVELS OF EVIDENCE.........................................................17
4.1 Submission Levels .......................................................................................................................................17
SECTION 5 – PART SUBMISSION STATUS.......................................................................................................19
5.1 General .......................................................................................................................................................19
5.2 Customer PPAP Status ...............................................................................................................................19
5.2.1 Approved ........................................................................................................................................................... 19
5.2.2 Interim Approval ............................................................................................................................................... 19
5.2.3 Rejected ............................................................................................................................................................. 19
SECTION 6 – RECORD RETENTION ..................................................................................................................21
APPENDIX A – COMPLETION OF THE PART SUBMISSION WARRANT (PSW) .............................................................22
APPENDIX B – COMPLETION OF THE APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT ...................................................................26
APPENDIX C – PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL, DIMENSIONAL RESULTS .................................................................29
APPENDIX D – PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL, MATERIAL TEST RESULTS ..............................................................31
APPENDIX E – PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL, PERFORMANCE TEST RESULTS........................................................33
APPENDIX F – BULK MATERIAL - SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................35
APPENDIX G – TIRES - SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS .....................................................................................................55
APPENDIX H – TRUCK INDUSTRY - SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................57
GLOSSARY............................................................................................................................................................65

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition iii Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition iv Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

INTRODUCTION
Purpose
Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) defines generic requirements for production part approval,
including production and bulk materials (see Glossary). The purpose of PPAP is to determine if all
customer engineering design record and specification requirements are properly understood by the
organization and that the manufacturing process has the potential to produce product consistently meeting
these requirements during an actual production run at the quoted production rate.

Applicability
PPAP shall apply to internal and external organization sites (see Glossary) supplying production parts,
service parts, production materials, or bulk materials. For bulk materials, PPAP is not required unless
specified by the authorized customer representative.
An organization supplying standard catalog production or service parts shall comply with PPAP unless
formally waived by the authorized customer representative.
NOTE 1: See customer-specific requirements for additional information. All questions about PPAP
should be addressed to the authorized customer representative.
NOTE 2: A customer can formally waive PPAP requirements for an organization. Such waivers can only
be issued by an authorized customer representative.
NOTE 3: An organization or supplier requesting a waiver of a PPAP requirement should contact the
authorized customer representative. The organization or supplier should obtain documentation of waivers
from the authorized customer representative.
NOTE 4: Catalog parts (e.g., bolts) are identified and/or ordered by functional specifications or by
recognized industry standards.

Approach
The word “shall” indicates mandatory requirements. The word “should” indicates a recommendation.
Paragraphs marked “NOTE” are for guidance in understanding or clarifying the associated requirement.
The word “should” appearing in a NOTE is for guidance only.
For the purposes of PPAP, the terms and definitions given in ISO/TS 16949 and the PPAP Glossary
apply.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 1 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 2 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

SECTION 1 – GENERAL
1.1 Submission of PPAP
The organization shall obtain approval (see 5.2.1) from the authorized customer representative for:
1. a new part or product (e.g., a specific part, material, or color not previously supplied to the
specific customer).
2. correction of a discrepancy on a previously submitted part.
3. product modified by an engineering change to design records, specifications, or materials.
4. any situation required by Section 3.
NOTE: If there is any question concerning the need for production part approval, contact the authorized
customer representative.

SECTION 2 – PPAP PROCESS REQUIREMENTS

2.1 Significant Production Run
For production parts, product for PPAP shall be taken from a significant production run. This
significant production run shall be from one hour to eight hours of production, and with the specific
production quantity to total a minimum of 300 consecutive parts, unless otherwise specified by the
authorized customer representative.
This significant production run shall be conducted at the production site, at the production rate (see
Glossary) using the production tooling, production gaging, production process, production materials, and
production operators. Parts from each unique production process, e.g., duplicate assembly line and/or
work cell, each position of a multiple cavity die, mold, tool or pattern, shall be measured and
representative parts tested.
For bulk materials: No specific number of “parts” is required. The submitted sample shall be taken in a
manner as to assure that it represents “steady-state” operation of the process.
NOTE: For bulk material, production histories of current products may often be used to estimate the initial
process capability or performance of new and similar products. In cases where no production history of a
similar bulk material product or technology exists, a containment plan may be put into effect until sufficient
production has demonstrated capability or performance, unless otherwise specified by the customer.

2.2 PPAP Requirements

The organization shall meet all specified PPAP requirements listed below (2.2.1 through 2.2.18). The
organization shall also meet all customer-specific PPAP requirements.
Production parts shall meet all customer engineering design record and specification requirements
(including safety and regulatory requirements).
Bulk Material PPAP requirements are defined by a completed Bulk Material Requirements Checklist (see
Appendix F).

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 3 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

If any part specifications cannot be met, the organization shall document their problem-solving efforts
and shall contact the authorized customer representative for concurrence in determination of appropriate
corrective action.
NOTE: Items or records from 2.2.1 through 2.2.18 may not necessarily apply to every customer part
number from every organization. For example, some parts do not have appearance requirements, others do
not have color requirements, and plastic parts may have polymeric part marking requirements. In order to
determine with certainty which items must be included, consult the design record, e.g., part print, the
relevant Engineering documents or specifications, and your authorized customer representative.

2.2.1 Design Record

The organization shall have the design record for the saleable product/part, including design records for
components or details of the saleable product/part. Where the design record is in electronic format, e.g.,
CAD/CAM math data, the organization shall produce a hard copy (e.g., pictorial, geometric dimensioning
& tolerancing [GD&T] sheets, drawing) to identify measurements taken.
NOTE 1: For any saleable product, part or component, there will only be one design record, regardless of
who has design-responsibility. The design record may reference other documents making them part of the
design record.
NOTE 2: A single design record can represent multiple part or assembly configurations, e.g., a sub-frame
assembly with various hole configurations for different applications.
NOTE 3: For parts identified as black box (see Glossary), the design record specifies the interface and
performance requirements.
NOTE 4: For parts identified as catalog parts, the design record may consist only of a functional
specification or a reference to a recognized industry standard.
NOTE 5: For bulk materials, the design records may include identification of raw materials, formulations,
processing steps and parameters, and final product specifications or acceptance criteria. If dimensional
results do not apply, then CAD/CAM requirements are also not applicable.

2.2.1.1 Reporting of Part Material Composition

The organization shall provide evidence that the Material/Substance Composition reporting that is
required by the customer has been completed for the part and that the reported data complies with all
customer-specific requirements.
NOTE: This materials reporting may be entered into the IMDS (International Materials Data System) or
other customer-specified system/method. IMDS is available through http://www.mdsystem.com/index.jsp.
2.2.1.2 Marking of Polymeric Parts
Where applicable, the organization shall identify polymeric parts with the ISO symbols such as specified
in ISO 11469, “Plastics – Generic Identification and marking of plastic products” and/or ISO 1629,
“Rubber and lattices – Nomenclature.” The following weight criteria shall determine if the marking
requirement is applicable:
• Thermoplastic parts weighing at least 100g (using ISO 11469/1043-1)
• Thermoset parts weighing at least 200g (using ISO 11469/1629)
NOTE: Nomenclature and abbreviation references to support the use of ISO 11469 are contained in ISO
1043-1 for basic polymers and in ISO 1043-2 for fillers and reinforcements.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 4 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

2.2.2 Authorized Engineering Change documents

The organization shall have any authorized engineering change documents for those changes not yet
recorded in the design record but incorporated in the product, part or tooling.

2.2.3 Customer Engineering Approval

Where specified by the customer, the organization shall have evidence of customer engineering approval.
NOTE: For bulk materials, this requirement is satisfied by a signed ‘Engineering Approval’ line item on
the Bulk Material Requirements Checklist (see Appendix F) and/or inclusion on a customer maintained list
of approved materials.

2.2.4 Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Design FMEA)

if the organization is product design-responsible
The product design-responsible organization shall develop a Design FMEA in accordance with, and
compliant to, customer-specified requirements (e.g., Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
reference manual).
NOTE 1: A single Design FMEA may be applied to a family of similar parts or materials.
NOTE 2: For bulk materials, see Appendix F.

2.2.5 Process Flow Diagram(s)

The organization shall have a process flow diagram in an organization-specified format that clearly
describes the production process steps and sequence, as appropriate, and meets the specified customer
needs, requirements and expectations (e.g., Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan
reference manual). For bulk materials, an equivalent to a Process Flow Diagram is a Process Flow
Description.
NOTE: Process flow diagrams for ‘families’ of similar parts are acceptable if the new parts have been
reviewed for commonality by the organization.

2.2.6 Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (Process FMEA)

The organization shall develop a Process FMEA in accordance with, and compliant to, customer-specified
requirements, (e.g., Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis reference manual).
NOTE 1: A single Process FMEA may be applied to a process manufacturing a family of similar parts or
materials if reviewed for commonality by the organization.
NOTE 2: For bulk materials, see Appendix F.

2.2.7 Control Plan

The organization shall have a Control Plan that defines all methods used for process control and complies
with customer-specified requirements (e.g., Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan
reference manual).
NOTE 1: Control Plans for “families” of parts are acceptable if the new parts have been reviewed for
commonality by the organization.
NOTE 2: Control Plan approval may be required by certain customers.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 5 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

2.2.8 Measurement System Analysis Studies

The organization shall have applicable Measurement System Analysis studies, e.g., gage R&R, bias,
linearity, stability, for all new or modified gages, measurement, and test equipment. (see the
Measurement Systems Analysis reference manual).
NOTE 1: Gage R&R acceptability criteria are defined in the Measurement Systems Analysis reference
manual.
NOTE 2: For bulk materials, Measurement System Analysis may not apply. Customer agreement should
be obtained on actual requirements.

2.2.9 Dimensional Results

The organization shall provide evidence that dimensional verifications required by the design record and
the Control Plan have been completed and results indicate compliance with specified requirements. The
organization shall have dimensional results for each unique manufacturing process, e.g., cells or
production lines and all cavities, molds, patterns or dies (see 2.2.18). The organization shall record, with
the actual results: all dimensions (except reference dimensions), characteristics, and specifications as
noted on the design record and Control Plan.
The organization shall indicate the date of the design record, change level, and any authorized
engineering change document not yet incorporated in the design record to which the part was made. The
organization shall record the change level, drawing date, organization name and part number on all
auxiliary documents (e.g., supplementary layout results sheets, sketches, tracings, cross sections, CMM
inspection point results, geometric dimensioning and tolerancing sheets, or other auxiliary drawings used
in conjunction with the part drawing). Copies of these auxiliary materials shall accompany the
dimensional results according to the Retention/Submission Requirements Table. A tracing shall be
included when an optical comparator is necessary for inspection.
The organization shall identify one of the parts measured as the master sample (see 2.2.15).
NOTE 1: The Dimensional Results form in Appendix C, a pictorial, geometric dimensioning & tolerancing
[GD&T] sheets, or a checked print where the results are legibly written on a part drawing including cross-
sections, tracings, or sketches as applicable may be utilized for this purpose.
NOTE 2: Dimensional results typically do not apply to bulk materials.

2.2.10 Records of Material / Performance Test Results

The organization shall have records of material and/or performance test results for tests specified on the
design record or Control Plan.
2.2.10.1 Material Test Results
The organization shall perform tests for all parts and product materials when chemical, physical, or
metallurgical requirements are specified by the design record or Control Plan.
Material test results shall indicate and include:
• the design record change level of the parts tested;
• any authorized engineering change documents that have not yet been incorporated in the
design record;
• the number, date, and change level of the specifications to which the part was tested;
• the date on which the testing took place;
• the quantity tested;

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 6 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

• the actual results;

• the material supplier’s name and, when required by the customer, the customer-assigned
supplier/vendor code.
NOTE: Material test results may be presented in any convenient format. An example is shown in
Appendix D.
For products with customer-developed material specifications and a customer-approved supplier list, the
organization shall procure materials and/or services (e.g., painting, plating, heat-treating, welding) from
suppliers on that list.
2.2.10.2 Performance Test Results
The organization shall perform tests for all part(s) or product material(s) when performance or functional
requirements are specified by the design record or Control Plan.
Performance test results shall indicate and include:
• the design record change level of the parts tested;
• any authorized engineering change documents that have not yet been incorporated in the
design record;
• the number, date, and change level of the specifications to which the part was tested;
• the date on which the testing took place;
• the quantity tested;
• the actual results.
NOTE: Performance test results may be presented in any convenient format. An example is shown in
Appendix E.

2.2.11 Initial Process Studies

2.2.11.1 General
The level of initial process capability or performance shall be determined to be acceptable prior to
submission for all Special Characteristics designated by the customer or organization. The organization
shall obtain customer concurrence on the index for estimating initial process capability prior to
submission.
The organization shall perform measurement system analysis to understand how measurement error
affects the study measurements. (see 2.2.8)
NOTE 1: Where no special characteristics have been identified, the customer reserves the right to require
demonstration of initial process capability on other characteristics.
NOTE 2: The purpose of this requirement is to determine if the production process is likely to produce
product that will meet the customer’s requirements. The initial process study is focused on variables not
attribute data. Assembly errors, test failures, surface defects are examples of attribute data, which is
important to understand, but is not covered in this initial study. To understand the performance of
characteristics monitored by attribute data will require more data collected over time. Unless approved by
the authorized customer representative, attribute data are not acceptable for PPAP submissions.
NOTE 3: Cpk and Ppk are described below. Other methods more appropriate for certain processes or
products may be substituted with prior approval from an authorized customer representative.
NOTE 4: Initial process studies are short-term and will not predict the effects of time and variation in
people, materials, methods, equipment, measurement systems, and environment. Even for these short-term
studies, it is important to collect and analyze the data in the order produced using control charts.
NOTE 5: For those characteristics that can be studied using X-bar and R charts, a short-term study should
be based on a minimum of 25 subgroups containing at least 100 readings from consecutive parts of the

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 7 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

significant production run (see 2.1). The initial process study data requirements may be replaced by longer-
term historical data from the same or similar processes, with customer concurrence. For certain processes,
alternative analytical tools such as individual and moving range charts may be appropriate and permitted
with prior approval from an authorized customer representative.

2.2.11.2 Quality Indices

Initial process studies shall be summarized with capability or performance indices, if applicable.
NOTE 1: The initial process study results are dependent on the purpose of the study, method of data
acquisition, sampling, amount of data, demonstration of statistical control, etc. See the Statistical Process
Control reference manual for additional information in understanding the basic principles of statistical
stability and process measures (indices). For guidance on items listed below, contact the authorized
customer representative.
Cpk - The capability index for a stable process. The estimate of sigma is based on within subgroup
variation (R-bar/d2 or S-bar/c4). Cpk is an indicator of process capability based on process variation within
each subgroup of a set of data. Cpk does not include the effect of process variability between the subgroups.
Cpk is an indicator of how good a process could be if all process variation between subgroups was to be
eliminated. Therefore, use of Cpk alone may be an incomplete indicator of process performance. For more
information, see the Statistical Process Control reference manual.
Ppk - The performance index. The estimate of sigma is based on total variation (all of individual sample
data using the standard deviation [root mean square equation], “s”). Ppk is an indicator of process
performance based on process variation throughout the full set of data. Unlike Cpk, Ppk is not limited to the
variation within subgroups. However, Ppk cannot isolate within subgroup variation from between subgroup
variation. When calculated from the same data set, Cpk and Ppk can be compared to analyze the sources of
process variation. For more information, see the Statistical Process Control reference manual.
Initial Process Studies. The purpose of the initial process study is to understand the process variation, not
just to achieve a specific index value. When historical data are available or enough initial data exist to plot
a control chart (at least 100 individual samples), Cpk can be calculated when the process is stable.
Otherwise, for processes with known and predictable special causes and output meeting specifications, Ppk
should be used. When not enough data are available (< 100 samples) or there are unknown sources of
variation, contact the authorized customer representative to develop a suitable plan.
NOTE 2: For Initial Process Studies involving more than one process stream, additional appropriate
statistical methods or approaches may be required.
NOTE 3: For bulk material, the organization should obtain customer agreement regarding the appropriate
techniques for initial process studies, if required, in order to determine an effective estimate of capability.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 8 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

2.2.11.3 Acceptance Criteria for Initial Study

The organization shall use the following as acceptance criteria for evaluating initial process study results
for processes that appear stable.

Results Interpretation
Index > 1.67 The process currently meets the acceptance criteria.
1.33 ≤ Index ≤ 1.67 The process may be acceptable. Contact the authorized
customer representative for a review of the study results.
Index < 1.33 The process does not currently meet the acceptance criteria.
Contact the authorized customer representative for a review of
the study results.
NOTE 1: Meeting the initial process study capability acceptance criteria is one of a number of customer
requirements that leads to an approved PPAP submission.
NOTE 2: See 2.11.1 and 2.11.2.

2.2.11.4 Unstable Processes

Depending on the nature of the instability, an unstable process may not meet customer requirements. The
organization shall identify, evaluate and, wherever possible, eliminate special causes of variation prior to
PPAP submission. The organization shall notify the authorized customer representative of any unstable
processes that exist and shall submit a corrective action plan to the customer prior to any submission.
NOTE: For bulk materials, for processes with known and predictable special causes and output meeting
specifications, corrective action plans may not be required by the customer.

2.2.11.5 Processes With One-Sided Specifications or Non-Normal Distributions

The organization shall determine with the authorized customer representative alternative acceptance
criteria for processes with one-sided specifications or non-normal distributions.
NOTE: The above mentioned acceptance criteria (2.2.11.3) assume normality and a two-sided
specification (target in the center). When this is not true, using this analysis may result in unreliable
information. These alternate acceptance criteria could require a different type of index or some method of
transformation of the data. The focus should be on understanding the reasons for the non-normality (e.g., is
it stable over time?) and managing variation. Refer to the Statistical Process Control reference manual
for further guidance.

2.2.11.6 Actions To Be Taken When Acceptance Criteria Are Not Satisfied

The organization shall contact the authorized customer representative if the acceptance criteria (2.2.11.3)
cannot be attained by the required PPAP submission date. The organization shall submit to the
authorized customer representative for approval a corrective action plan and a modified Control Plan
normally providing for 100% inspection. Variation reduction efforts shall continue until the acceptance
criteria are met, or until customer approval is received.
NOTE 1: 100% inspection methodologies are subject to review and concurrence by the customer.
NOTE 2: For bulk materials, 100% inspection means an evaluation of a sample(s) of product from a
continuous process or homogeneous batch which is representative of the entire production run.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 9 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

2.2.12 Qualified Laboratory Documentation

Inspection and testing for PPAP shall be performed by a qualified laboratory as defined by customer
requirements (e.g., an accredited laboratory). The qualified laboratory (internal or external to the
organization) shall have a laboratory scope and documentation showing that the laboratory is qualified for
the type of measurements or tests conducted.
When an external/commercial laboratory is used, the organization shall submit the test results on the
laboratory letterhead or the normal laboratory report format. The name of the laboratory that performed
the tests, the date (s) of the tests, and the standards used to run the tests shall be identified.

2.2.13 Appearance Approval Report (AAR)

A separate Appearance Approval Report (AAR) shall be completed for each part or series of parts if the
product/part has appearance requirements on the design record.
Upon satisfactory completion of all required criteria, the organization shall record the required
information on the AAR. The completed AAR and representative production products/parts shall be
submitted to the location specified by the customer to receive disposition. AARs (complete with part
disposition and authorized customer representative signature) shall then accompany the PSW at the time
of final submission based upon the submission level requested. See customer-specific requirements for
any additional requirements.
NOTE 1: AAR typically applies only for parts with color, grain, or surface appearance requirements.
NOTE 2: Certain customers may not require entries in all AAR fields. See Appendix B or customer-
specifics for detailed instructions on completing the AAR.

2.2.14 Sample Production Parts

The organization shall provide sample product as specified by the customer.

2.2.15 Master Sample

The organization shall retain a master sample for the same period as the production part approval records,
or a) until a new master sample is produced for the same customer part number for customer approval, or
b) where a master sample is required by the design record, Control Plan or inspection criteria, as a
reference or standard. The master sample shall be identified as such, and shall show the customer
approval date on the sample. The organization shall retain a master sample for each position of a multiple
cavity die, mold, tool or pattern, or production process unless otherwise specified by the customer.
NOTE 1: When part size, sheer volume of parts, etc. makes storage of a master sample difficult, the
sample retention requirements may be modified or waived in writing by the authorized customer
representative. The purpose of the master sample is to assist in defining the production standard, especially
where data is ambiguous or in insufficient detail to fully replicate the part to its original approved state.
NOTE 2: Many bulk material properties are by their nature time dependent, and if a master sample is
required, it may consist of the manufacturing record, test results, and certificate of analysis of key
ingredients, for the approved submission sample. (see Appendix F).

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 10 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

2.2.16 Checking Aids

If requested by the customer, the organization shall submit with the PPAP submission any part-specific
assembly or component checking aid.
The organization shall certify that all aspects of the checking aid agree with part dimensional
requirements. The organization shall document all released engineering design changes that have been
incorporated in the checking aid at the time of submission. The organization shall provide for preventive
maintenance of any checking aids for the life of the part (see Glossary - “Active Part”).
Measurement system analysis studies, e.g., gage R & R, accuracy, bias, linearity, stability studies, shall be
conducted in compliance with customer requirements. (see 2.2.8 and the Measurement Systems
Analysis reference manual).
NOTE 1: Checking aids can include fixtures, variable and attribute gages, models, templates, mylars
specific to the product being submitted.
NOTE 2: Checking aids, etc. typically do not apply to Bulk Materials. If checking aids are used for bulk
materials, the organization should contact the authorized customer representative regarding this
requirement.

2.2.17 Customer-Specific Requirements

The organization shall have records of compliance to all applicable customer-specific requirements. For
bulk materials, applicable customer-specific requirements shall be documented on the Bulk Material
Requirements Checklist.

2.2.18 Part Submission Warrant (PSW)

Upon completion of all PPAP requirements, the organization shall complete the Part Submission Warrant
(PSW).
A separate PSW shall be completed for each customer part number unless otherwise agreed to by the
authorized customer representative.
If production parts will be produced from more than one cavity, mold, tool, die, pattern, or production
process, e.g., line or cell, the organization shall complete a dimensional evaluation (see 2.2.9) on one part
from each. The specific cavities, molds, line, etc., shall then be identified in the “Mold/Cavity/Production
Process” line on a PSW, or in a PSW attachment.
The organization shall verify that all of the measurement and test results show conformance with
customer requirements and that all required documentation is available and, for Level 2, 3, and 4, is
included in the submission as appropriate. A responsible official of the organization shall approve the
PSW and provide contact information.
NOTE 1: One warrant per customer part number can be used to summarize many changes providing that
the changes are adequately documented, and the submission is in compliance with customer program
timing requirements.
NOTE 2: PSWs may be submitted electronically in compliance with customer requirements.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 11 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

2.2.18.1 Part Weight (Mass)

The organization shall record on the PSW the part weight of the part as shipped, measured and expressed
in kilograms to four decimal places (0.0000) unless otherwise specified by the customer. The weight shall
not include shipping protectors, assembly aides, or packaging materials. To determine part weight, the
organization shall individually weigh ten randomly selected parts, calculate and report the average
weight. At least one part shall be measured from each cavity, tool, line or process to be used in product
realization.
NOTE: This weight is used for vehicle weight analysis only and does not affect the approval process.
Where there is no production or service requirement for at least ten parts, the organization should use the
required number for calculation of the average part weight. For bulk materials, the part weight field is not
applicable.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 12 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

SECTION 3 – CUSTOMER NOTIFICATION AND

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Customer Notification

The organization shall notify the authorized customer representative of any planned changes to the
design, process, or site. Examples are indicated in the table below (see Table 3.1).
NOTE: Organizations are responsible to notify the authorized customer representative of all changes to
the part design and/or the manufacturing process.
Upon notification and approval of the proposed change by the authorized customer representative, and
after change implementation, PPAP submission is required unless otherwise specified.

Table 3.1
Examples of changes requiring Clarification of examples
notification
1. Use of other construction or material For example, other construction as documented on
than was used in the previously approved a deviation (permit) or included as a note on the
part or product design record and not covered by an engineering
change as described in Table 3.2, #3.
2. Production from new or modified tools This requirement only applies to tools, which due
(except perishable tools), dies, molds to their unique form or function, can be expected
patterns, etc. including additional or to influence the integrity of the final product. It is
replacement tooling not meant to describe standard tools (new or
repaired), such as standard measuring devices,
drivers (manual or power), etc.
3. Production following upgrade or Upgrade means the reconstruction and/or
rearrangement of existing tooling or modification of a tool or machine or to increase the
equipment. capacity, performance, or change its existing
function. This is not meant to be confused with
normal maintenance, repair or replacement of
parts, etc., for which no change in performance is
to be expected and post repair verification methods
have been established.
Rearrangement is defined as activity that changes
the sequence of product/process flow from that
documented in the process flow diagram
(including the addition of a new process).
Minor adjustments of production equipment may
be required to meet safety requirements such as,
installation of protective covers, elimination of
potential ESD risks, etc.
4. Production from tooling and equipment Production process tooling and /or equipment
transferred to a different plant site or from transferred between buildings or facilities at one or
an additional plant site. more sites.
5. Change of supplier for parts, non- The organization is responsible for approval of
equivalent materials, or services (e.g., heat- supplier provided material and services.
treating, plating).

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 13 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

6. Product produced after the tooling has For product that has been produced after tooling
been inactive for volume production for has been inactive for twelve months or more:
twelve months or more. Notification is required when the part has had no
change in active purchase order and the existing
tooling has been inactive for volume production
for twelve months or more. The only exception is
when the part has low volume, e.g., service or
specialty vehicles. However a customer may
specify certain PPAP requirements for service
parts.
7. Product and process changes related to Any changes, including changes at the suppliers to
components of the production product the organization and their suppliers, that affect
manufactured internally or manufactured by customer requirements, e.g., fit, form, function,
suppliers. performance, durability.
8. Change in test/inspection method – new For change in test method, the organization should
technique (no effect on acceptance criteria) have evidence that the new method has
measurement capability equivalent to the old
method.
Additionally, for bulk materials:

9. New source of raw material from new or

existing supplier. These changes would normally be expected to
have an effect on the performance of the product.
10. Change in product appearance attributes

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 14 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

3.2 Submission to Customer

The organization shall submit for PPAP approval prior to the first production shipment in the following
situations unless the authorized customer representative has waived this requirement (see Table 3.2).
NOTE: In the situations described below, prior notification to, or communication with, the authorized
customer representative is assumed.
The organization shall review and update, as necessary, all applicable items in the PPAP file to reflect the
production process, regardless of whether or not the customer requests a formal submission. The PPAP
file shall contain the name of the authorized customer representative granting the waiver and the date.

Table 3.2
Requirement Clarification or examples
1. A new part or product (i.e. a specific part, Submission is required for a new product
material, or color not previously supplied to the (initial release) or a previously approved
customer) product that has a new or revised product/part
number (e.g., suffix) assigned to it. A new
part/product or material added to a family may
use appropriate PPAP documentation from a
previously fully approved part within the same
product family.
2. Correction of a discrepancy on a previously Submission is required to correct any
submitted part. discrepancies on a previously submitted part.
A “discrepancy” can be related to:
• The product performance against the
customer requirements
• Dimensional or capability issues
• Supplier issues
• Full Approval of a part replacing an
interim approval
• Testing, including material,
performance, or engineering validation
issues
3. Engineering change to design records, Submission is required on any engineering
specifications, or materials for production change to production product/part design
product/part numbers(s). records, specifications or materials.
Additionally, for Bulk Materials:

4. Process technology new to the organization,

not previously used for this product.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 15 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 16 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

SECTION 4 – SUBMISSION TO CUSTOMER - LEVELS

OF EVIDENCE

4.1 Submission Levels

The organization shall submit the items and/or records specified in the level identified below in Table 4.1:

Table 4.1
Level 1 Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval
Report) submitted to the customer.

Level 2 Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to the
customer.

Level 3 Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to the
customer.

Level 4 Warrant and other requirements as defined by the customer.

Level 5 Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at the
organization’s manufacturing location.

See Retention/Submission Requirements Table 4.2 for exact retention/submission requirements for each
submission level.
The organization shall use level 3 as the default level for all submissions unless otherwise specified by the
authorized customer representative.
The minimum submission requirement for bulk materials is the PSW and the Bulk Materials Checklist.
For Bulk Material PPAP submissions, check “Other” in the Reason for Submission Section on the PSW
form and specify “Bulk Material.” This indicates that the "Bulk Material Requirements Checklist" was
used to specify the PPAP requirements for the bulk material and shall be included in the submission
packet.
NOTE 1: The authorized customer representative may identify a submission level, different from the
default level, that is to be used with each organization, or organization and customer part number
combination. Different customer locations may assign different submission levels to the same organization
manufacturing location.
NOTE 2: All of the forms referenced in this document may be replaced by computer-generated
facsimiles. Acceptability of these facsimiles is to be confirmed with the authorized customer representative
prior to the first submission.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 17 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Retention/Submission Requirements Table 4.2

(Normative)
[NOTE: Table 4.2 lists submission and retention requirements. Mandatory and applicable
requirements for a PPAP record are defined in the PPAP manual and by the customer.]

Submission Level
Requirement Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
1. Design Record R S S * R
- for proprietary components/details R R R * R
- for all other components/details R S S * R
2. Engineering Change Documents, if any R S S * R
3. Customer Engineering approval, if required R R S * R
4. Design FMEA R R S * R
5. Process Flow Diagrams R R S * R
6. Process FMEA R R S * R
7. Control Plan R R S * R
8. Measurement System Analysis Studies R R S * R
9. Dimensional Results R S S * R
10. Material, Performance Test Results R S S * R
11. Initial Process Studies R R S * R
12. Qualified Laboratory Documentation R S S * R
13. Appearance Approval Report (AAR), S S S * R
if applicable
14. Sample Product R S S * R
15. Master Sample R R R * R
16. Checking Aids R R R * R
17. Records of Compliance R R S * R
With Customer-Specific Requirements
18. Part Submission Warrant (PSW) S S S S R
Bulk Material Checklist (see 4.1 above) S S S S R

S = The organization shall submit to the customer and retain a copy of records or documentation items at appropriate
locations.
R = The organization shall retain at appropriate locations and make available to the customer upon request.
* = The organization shall retain at appropriate locations and submit to the customer upon request.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 18 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

SECTION 5 – PART SUBMISSION STATUS

5.1 General
Upon approval of the submission, the organization shall assure that future production continues to meet
all customer requirements.
NOTE: For those organizations that have been classified as “self certifying” (PPAP submission level 1)
by a specific customer, submission of the required organization-approved documentation will be considered
as customer approval unless the organization is advised otherwise.

5.2 Customer PPAP Status

5.2.1 Approved
Approved indicates that the part or material, including all sub-components, meets all customer
requirements. The organization is therefore authorized to ship production quantities of the product,
subject to releases from the customer scheduling activity.
5.2.2 Interim Approval
Interim Approval permits shipment of material for production requirements on a limited time or piece
quantity basis. Interim Approval will only be granted when the organization has:
• clearly defined the non-compliances preventing approval; and,
• prepared an action plan agreed upon by the customer. PPAP re-submission is required to
obtain a status of “approved.”
Note 1: The organization is responsible for implementing containment actions to ensure that only
acceptable material is being shipped to the customer.
Note 2: Parts with a status of “Interim Approval” are not to be considered “Approved.”
Material covered by an interim approval that fails to meet the agreed-upon action plan, either by the
expiration date or the shipment of the authorized quantity, will be rejected. No additional shipments are
authorized unless an extension of the interim approval is granted.
For bulk materials, the organization shall use the “Bulk Material Interim Approval” form, or its
equivalent (see Appendix F).
5.2.3 Rejected
Rejected means that the PPAP submission does not meet customer requirements, based on the production
lot from which it was taken and/or accompanying documentation. In such cases, the submission and/or
process, as appropriate, shall be corrected to meet customer requirements. The submission shall be
approved before production quantities may be shipped.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 19 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 20 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

SECTION 6 – RECORD RETENTION

PPAP records (see 2.2), regardless of submission level, shall be maintained for the length of time that the
part is active (see Glossary) plus one calendar year.
The organization shall ensure that the appropriate PPAP records from a superseded part PPAP file are
included, or referenced in the new part PPAP file.
NOTE: An example of an appropriate document/record that should be carried forward from the old file to
the new part file would be a material certification from a raw material supplier for a new part that
represents only a dimensional change from the old part number. This should be identified by conducting a
PPAP “gap analysis” between the old and new part numbers.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 21 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix A – Completion of the Part Submission

Warrant (PSW)
PART INFORMATION
1. Part Name and 2a. Customer Part Number: Engineering released finished end item part name and number.
2b. Org, Part Number: Part number defined by the organization, if any.
3. Shown on Drawing Number: The design record that specifies the customer part number being submitted.
4. Engineering Change Level & Date: Show the change level and date of the design record.
5. Additional Engineering Changes & Date: List all authorized engineering changes not yet incorporated in the design record but
which are incorporated in the part.
6. Safety and/or Government Regulation: “Yes” if so indicated by the design record, otherwise “No.”
7. Purchase Order Number: Enter this number as found on the contract/purchase order.
8. Weight: Enter the actual weight in kilograms to four decimal places unless otherwise specified by the customer.
9/10 Checking Aid Number, Change Level and Date: If requested by the customer, enter the checking aid number, its change level and
date.
ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION
11. Organization Name & Supplier/Vendor Code: Show the name and code assigned to the manufacturing site on the purchase
order/contract.
12. Street Address, Region, Postal Code, Country: Show the complete address of the location where the product was manufactured.
For “Region,” enter state, county, province, etc.
CUSTOMER SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
13. Customer Name/Division: Show the corporate name and division or operations group.
14. Buyer/Buyer Code: Enter the buyer’s name and code.
15. Application: Enter the model year, vehicle name, engine, transmission, etc.
MATERIALS REPORTING
16. Substances of Concern: Enter “Yes,” “No,” or “n/a”.
IMDS/Other Customer Format: Circle either “IMDS” or “Other Customer Format” as appropriate. If submitted via IMDS include:
Module ID #, Version #, and Creation Date. If submitted via other customer format, enter the date customer confirmation was
received.
17. Polymeric Parts Identification: Enter “Yes,” “No,” or “n/a”.
REASON FOR SUBMISSION
18. Check the appropriate box(es). For bulk materials, in addition to checking the appropriate box, check “Other” and write “Bulk
Material” in the space provided.
SUBMISSION LEVEL
19. SUBMISSION LEVEL: Identify the submission level requested by the customer.
SUBMISSION RESULTS
20. Check the appropriate boxes for dimensional, material tests, performance tests, appearance evaluation, and statistical data.
21. Check the appropriate box. If “no,” enter the explanation in “comments” below.
22. Molds/Cavities/Production Processes: For instruction, see 2.2.18.
DECLARATION
23. Enter the number of pieces manufactured during the significant production run.
24. Enter the time (in hours) taken for the significant production run.
25. EXPLANATION/COMMENTS: Provide any explanatory comments on the Submission Results or any deviations from the
Declaration. Attach additional information as appropriate.
26 CUSTOMER TOOL TAGGING/NUMBERING: Are customer-owned tools identified in accord with ISO/TS 16949 and any
customer-specific requirements, answer “Yes” or “No.” May not be applicable to OEM internal suppliers.
27 ORGANIZATION AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: A responsible organization official, after verifying that the results show
conformance to all customer requirements and that all required documentation is available, shall approve the declaration and provide
Title, Phone Number, Fax Number, and e-mail address.
FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY
Leave blank.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 22 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Part Submission Warrant

Part Name
1 Cust. Part Number
2a

Shown on Drawing No.

3 Org. Part Number
2b
4 Dated
Engineering Change Level

Additional Engineering Changes

5 Dated
7 8
Safety and/or Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)
6
Checking Aid No.
9 10 Dated
Checking Aid Engineering Change Level

ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION CUSTOMER SUBMITTAL INFORMATION

11 13
Supplier Name & Supplier/Vendor Code Customer Name/Division
12 14
Street Address Buyer/Buyer Code
15
City Region Postal Code Country Application
MATERIALS REPORTING
Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported?.
16 Yes n/a
No

Submitted by IMDS or other customer format:

Are polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? 17 Yes No n/a
REASON FOR SUBMISSION (Check at least one)
Initial Submission
18 Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other – please specify
REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one) 19
Level 1 – Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 2 – Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 – Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 4 – Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer.
Level 5 – Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at supplier's manufacturing location.

SUBMISSION RESULTS 20
The results for dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package
These results meet all design record requirements: Yes NO (If “NO” – Explanation Required) 21
Mold / Cavity / Production Process 22
DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrent are representative of our parts, which were made by a process that meets all Production Part
Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples were produced at the production rate of 23 / 24 hours.
I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review. I have noted any deviations from this declaration below.
EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:
25
Is each Customer Tool properly tagged and numbered? Yes No 26
27
Organization Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Phone No. FAX No.

Title e-mail

FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY (IF APPLICABLE)

PPAP Warrant Disposition: Approved Rejected Other

Customer Signature Date

Print Name Customer Tracking Number (optional)
March
2006 CFG-1001

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 23 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Part Submission Warrant

Part Name Cust. Part Number

Shown on Drawing No. Org. Part Number

Engineering Change Level Dated

Additional Engineering Changes Dated

Safety and/or Government Regulation Yes No Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)

Checking Aid No. Checking Aid Engineering Change Level Dated

ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION CUSTOMER SUBMITTAL INFORMATION

Organization Name & Supplier/Vendor Code Customer Name/Division

Street Address Buyer/Buyer Code

City Region Postal Code Country Application

MATERIALS REPORTING
Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported? Yes No n/a

Submitted by IMDS or other customer format:

Are polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? Yes No n/a
REASON FOR SUBMISSION (Check at least one)
Initial Submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other – please specify below
REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one)
Level 1 – Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 2 – Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 – Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 4 – Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer.
Level 5 – Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at organization's manufacturing location.

SUBMISSION RESULTS
The results for dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package
These results meet all design record requirements: Yes NO (If “NO” – Explanation Required)
Mold / Cavity / Production Process
DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrent are representative of our parts which were made by a process that meets all Production Part
Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples were produced at the production rate of / hours.
I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review. I have noted any deviations from this declaration below.
EXPLANATION/COMMENTS:

Is each Customer Tool properly tagged and numbered? Yes No n/a

Organization Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Phone No. FAX No.

Title E-mail

FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY (IF APPLICABLE)

PPAP Warrant Disposition: Approved Rejected Other

Customer Signature Date

Print Name Customer Tracking Number (optional)
March
2006 CFG-1001

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 24 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 25 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix B – Completion of the Appearance Approval

Report
1. Customer part number: Engineering released customer part number.
2. Drawing Number: Use the number of the drawing on which the part is shown if different from
the part number.
3. Application: Enter the model year(s) and vehicle or other program on which the part is used.
4. Part Name: Use the finished part name on the part drawing.
5. Buyer Code: Enter the code for specific buyer of part.
6/7. E/C Level & Date: Engineering change level and E/C date for this submission.
8. Organization Name: Organization responsible for submission (include supplier if applicable).
9. Manufacturing Location: Location where part was manufactured or assembled.
10. Supplier/Vendor Code: Customer-assigned code for organization location where the part was
manufactured or assembled.
11. Reason for Submission: Check box(es) explaining the reason for this submission.
12. Organization Sourcing & Texture Information: List all first surface tools, graining source(s),
grain type(s), and grain and gloss masters used to check part.
13. Pre-Texture Evaluation: To be completed by authorized customer representative (not used by
GM).
14. Color Suffix: Use alphanumeric or numeric color identification.
15. Tristimulus Data: List numerical (colorimeter) data of submission part as compared to the
customer-authorized master.
16. Master Number: Enter alphanumeric master identification (not used by Ford).
17. Master Date: Enter the date on which the master was approved.
18. Material Type: Identify first surface finish and substrate (i. e., paint/ABS).
19. Material Source: Identify first surface and substrate suppliers. Example: Redspot/Dow.
20. Color Evaluation, Hue, Value, Chroma, Metallic Brilliance & Gloss: Visual assessment by
customer.
21. Color Shipping Suffix: Color part number suffix or color number.
22. Part Disposition: To be determined by customer (approved or rejected).
23. Comments: General comments by the organization or customer (optional).
24. Organization Signature, Phone No. & Date: Organization certification that the document
information is accurate and meets all requirements specified.
25. Authorized Customer Representative Signature & Date: Authorized Customer Representative
approval signature.
THE AREAS INSIDE THE BOLD LINES ARE FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 26 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT
PART DRAWING APPLICATION
1 2 3
NUMBER NUMBER (VEHICLES)
PART BUYER E/C LEVEL DATE
4 5 6/7
NAME CODE
ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING SUPPLIER
8 9 10
NAME LOCATION CODE
REASON FOR PART SUBMISSION WARRANT SPECIAL SAMPLE RE-SUBMISSION OTHER
11
SUBMISSION PRE TEXTURE FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPMENT ENGINEERING CHANGE
APPEARANCE EVALUATION
AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER
12
SUPPLIER SOURCING AND TEXTURE INFORMATION PRE-TEXTURE REPRESENTATIVE
13
EVALUATION SIGNATURE AND DATE
CORRECT AND

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition

PROCEED
CORRECT AND
RESUBMIT

27
APPROVED TO
ETCH/TOOL/EDM
COLOR EVALUATION 21
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22
METALLIC COLOR
COLOR TRISTIMULUS DATA MASTER MASTER MATERIAL MATERIAL HUE VALUE CHROMA GLOSS BRILLIANCE SHIPPING PART
SUFFIX DL* Da* Db* DE* CMC NUMBER DATE TYPE SOURCE RED YEL GRN BLU LIGHT DARK GRAY CLEAN HIGH LOW HIGH LOW SUFFIX DISPOSITION
REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

COMMENTS
23

ORGANIZATION 24 PHONE NO. DATE AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER 25 DATE

Revision Date: November 30, 2005

SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE

March
2006
CFG-1002
 APPEARANCE APPROVAL REPORT
PART DRAWING APPLICATION
NUMBER NUMBER (VEHICLES)
PART BUYER E/C LEVEL DATE
NAME CODE
SUPPLIER MANUFACTURING SUPPLIER
NAME LOCATION CODE
REASON FOR PART SUBMISSION WARRANT SPECIAL SAMPLE RE-SUBMISSION OTHER
SUBMISSION PRE TEXTURE FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPMENT ENGINEERING CHANGE
APPEARANCE EVALUATION
AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER
SUPPLIER SOURCING AND TEXTURE INFORMATION PRE-TEXTURE REPRESENTATIVE
EVALUATION SIGNATURE AND DATE
CORRECT AND

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition

PROCEED
CORRECT AND
RESUBMIT

28
APPROVED TO
ETCH/TOOL/EDM
COLOR EVALUATION
METALLIC COLOR
COLOR TRISTIMULUS DATA MASTER MASTER MATERIAL MATERIAL HUE VALUE CHROMA GLOSS BRILLIANCE SHIPPING PART
SUFFIX DL* Da* Db* DE* CMC NUMBER DATE TYPE SOURCE RED YEL GRN BLU LIGHT DARK GRAY CLEAN HIGH LOW HIGH LOW SUFFIX DISPOSITION
REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

COMMENTS

ORGANIZATION PHONE NO. DATE AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER DATE

Revision Date: November 30, 2005

SIGNATURE REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE

March
2006
CFG-1002
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix C – Production Part Approval, Dimensional

Results
Production Part Approval
Dimensional Test Results

ORGANIZATION: PART NUMBER:

SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: PART NAME:
INSPECTION FACILITY: DESIGN RECORD CHANGE LEVEL:
ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS:

SPECIFICATION / TEST QTY. ORGANIZATION MEASUREMENT NOT

ITEM DIMENSION / SPECIFICATION LIMITS DATE TESTED RESULTS (DATA) OK OK

Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

March SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
2006 CFG-1003

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 29 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 30 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix D – Production Part Approval, Material Test

Results
Production Part Approval
Material Test Results

ORGANIZATION: PART NUMBER:

SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: PART NAME:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER: DESIGN RECORD CHANGE LEVEL:
*CUSTOMER SPECIFIED SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS:
* If source approval is req'd, include the Supplier (Source) & Customer assigned code. NAME of LABORATORY:
SPECIFICATION / TEST QTY. NOT
MATERIAL SPEC. NO. / REV / DATE LIMITS DATE TESTED SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS (DATA) OK OK

Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

March SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
2006 CFG-1004

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 31 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 32 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix E – Production Part Approval, Performance

Test Results
Production Part Approval
Performance Test Results

ORGANIZATION: PART NUMBER:

SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: PART NAME:
NAME of LABORATORY: DESIGN RECORD CHANGE LEVEL:
*CUSTOMER SPECIFIED SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: ENGINEERING CHANGE DOCUMENTS:
* If source approval is req'd, include the Supplier (Source) & Customer assigned code.
SPECIFICATION / TEST QTY. SUPPLIER TEST RESULTS (DATA) / NOT
TEST SPECIFICATION / REV / DATE LIMITS DATE TESTED TEST CONDITIONS OK OK

Blanket statements of conformance are unacceptable for any test results.

March SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
2006 CFG-1005

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 33 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 34 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix F – Bulk Material - Specific Requirements

F.1 Introduction
An organization supplying bulk materials shall comply with the requirements in this Appendix or use
guidance herein for clarification of PPAP. The requirements in this Appendix are minimums and may be
supplemented at the discretion of the organization and/or the customer.
F.2 Applicability
Organizations are responsible for applying PPAP to their suppliers of ingredients which have
organization-designated special characteristics.
Where OEM PPAP approval of a bulk material exists, evidence of that approval is sufficient as the PPAP
submission at other levels in the supply chain.
Examples of bulk material include, but are not limited to: adhesives and sealants (solders, elastomers);
chemicals (rinses, polishes, additives, treatments, colors/pigments, solvents); coatings (top coats,
undercoats, primers, phosphates, surface treatments); engine coolants (antifreeze); fabrics; film and film
laminates; ferrous and non-ferrous metals (bulk steel, aluminum, coils, ingots); foundry (sand/silica,
alloying materials, other minerals/ores); fuels and fuel components; glass and glass components;
lubricants (oils, greases, etc.); monomers, pre-polymers and polymers (rubbers, plastics, resins and their
precursors); and performance fluids (transmission, power steering, brake, refrigerant).

F.3 Bulk Materials Requirements Checklist (see 2.2)

For bulk material, the PPAP elements required are defined by the Bulk Materials Requirements
Checklist. Any customer-specific requirements shall be documented on the Bulk Materials Requirements
Checklist.
Use the Bulk Materials Requirements Checklist as follows:
• Required / Target Date: For each item listed in the checklist either enter a target date for
completion of the element or enter “NR” for Not Required.
• Primary Responsibility - Customer: Identify by name or function the individual who will
review and approve the element.
• Primary Responsibility - Organization: Identify by name or function the individual who will
assemble and assure the completeness of the element to be reviewed.
• Comments / Conditions: Identify any qualifying information or references to attached
documents that provide specific information regarding the element. For example, this may
include specific formats to be used for the Design Matrix or acceptable tolerances for
Measurement System Analysis (MSA) studies.
• Approved by: Enter the initials of the authorized customer representative who has reviewed
and accepted the element.
• Plan agreed to by: Identify the individuals (and their functions) who made and agreed upon
the project plan.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 35 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Bulk Materials Requirements Checklist Project:

Required / Primary Responsibility Comments/ Approved
Target Date Customer Organization Conditions by / date

Product Design and Development Verification

Design Matrix
Design FMEA
Special Product Characteristics
Design Records
Prototype Control Plan
Appearance Approval Report
Master Sample
Test Results
Dimensional Results
Checking Aids
Engineering Approval
Process Design and Development Verification
Process Flow Diagrams
Process FMEA
Special Process Characteristics
Pre-launch Control Plan
Production Control Plan
Measurement System Analysis
Interim Approval
Product and Process Validation
Initial Process Studies
Part Submission Warrant
Elements to be completed as needed
Customer Plant Connection
Customer-Specific Requirements
Change Documentation
Supplier Considerations

Plan Agreed to by: Name / Function Company / Title / Date

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 36 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.4 Design Matrix

F.4.1 Introduction
Organizations supplying bulk material generally deal with the chemistry and functionality of the product
being designed. Use of these suggestions will arrive at the same end point of a completed Design FMEA,
but with greater applicability to bulk materials. For bulk materials, a Design Matrix, when required, shall
be prepared prior to developing the Design FMEA. The Design Matrix determines the complex
interactions of formula ingredients, ingredient characteristics, product characteristics, process constraints,
and conditions for customer use. High impact items can then be effectively analyzed in the Design
FMEA.
F.4.2 Design Matrix – Elaboration
This matrix correlates customer expectations with the product design items.
Construct the Design Matrix referring to the example which will follow:
1. Along the horizontal axis, list the Functions (Desired Attributes/Potential Failure Modes).
2. Along the vertical axis, list the design items as Potential Causes (Category/Characteristics) :
• Formula Ingredients
• Ingredient Characteristics
• Product Characteristics
• Process Constraints
• Conditions for Use (customer process constraints)

3. For each design item, enter the current robust threshold range levels and units.
4. Correlate the potential causes to the potential failure modes using a number, letter, or symbol
representing the impact or strength of the relationship. Ask what would happen if a potential
cause item is allowed to go under or over its robust minimum or maximum, respectively.
5. After completion of the rankings in the Design Matrix, review the category/characteristics for
a preliminary assessment of Special Characteristics. Designate any Special Characteristics in
column 1.
6. The high negative impact potential causes are transferred to the Design FMEA for analysis.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 37 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 DESIGN MATRIX - GENERIC PAINT EXAMPLE
Product Code/Description: xxR-yyyy Basecoat Paint Project #: 00001

POTENTIAL CAUSES FUNCTION - DESIRED ATTRIBUTES (POTENTIAL FAILURE MODES)

CATEGORY /

Units
CHARACTERISTICS

RANGE
Crater Free

No Pinholing
No Edge Pull

FAILURE
Dirt / Seed Free

No Mudcracking
Stabel Rheology

No Telegraphing
HAPS Compliant

Good Color Match

Good Shelf Stability
Low/Accepable Odor

Characteristics
Prelim. Special
Good Hiding Latitude

Good Sag Resistance

Low /Acceptable VOC

Good Chip Resistance

Good Repair Adhesion

Good Florida Durability

Good Crack Resistance

Good Gloss/Image/Peel
Good Circulation Stability
Good Repair Processability

Workable VISC/Atomization

Good Accerlerated Durability

Good Overspray Compatibility

APPEARANCE
Good Delamination Resistance
Good FMVSS (Windsheild Adh.)

ROBUST THRESHOLD
PERFORMANCE
PROCESSABILITY
ENVIRONMENTAL

Formula Ingredients
Resin A under 40% UNITS 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1

over 50% “ 3 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1

Resin B under 25% Binder Solids 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 1

over 35% “ 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 1 1 1 1 1

Crosslinker under 20% Binder Solids 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 1 2 2

over 30% “ 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 0 1 1 1 3 1

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition

SP Rheology Control Additive under 0.50% Total Solids 1 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

over 2.50% “ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1

Color Dispersion-B under 1.00% Total Solids 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1

over 2.00% “ 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

38
Solvent D under 5% Formula Wgt. 3 1 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 2 1 1 1

over 15% “ 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 2 3 0 2 1 3 2 3

Alcohol Solvent under 2% Formula Wgt. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1

under 4% “ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 2 3

Ingredient Characteristics
Resign A-Viscosity under 30% Poise (#1 @ 50) 3 2 1 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 1

over 40% “ 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 1

SP Crosslinker-Imino (-NH) % under 1% % Molar Comp. 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0

over 10% “ 1 1 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3 1 1 1 1

Product Characteristics
SP Viscosity under 30 sec #4 Ford Cup 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 2 3 1 2 1 1 0 1

over 40 sec “ 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1

SP % NV Solids under 57% %N.V. @ 110ºC 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1

over 61% “ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Resistivity under 0.01 megaohms 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 1

over 0.15 “ 1 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 1

Process Constraints
Batch Mixing Temp under 70º ºF 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 1 0 1

over 110º “ 2 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1

Conditions for Use

Flash Time before Clear under 1 minutes 3 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 1 0

over 3 “ 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 0

Revision Date: November 30, 2005

SP Final Bake Temp. over 250º ºF 2 1 1 1 0 0 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 1 1

under 275º “ 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 2 3 1

NEGATIVE IMPACT ON CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS: HIGH=3; MED=2; LOW=1; NONE=0; UNKNOWN=?

 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.5 Design FMEA (see 2.2.4)

F.5.1 Effects of Failure and Severity Rankings
The following two steps provide an alternative method for identifying the Potential Effects of Failure and
assigning a Severity Ranking.
List Effects of Failure
• Consumer Effects - General terms identifying the loss experienced by the ultimate user of the
product (e.g., the vehicle buyer).
• Customer Effects - General terms identifying the loss experienced by the intermediate user of
your product (e.g., the vehicle manufacturer).
Assign a Severity Ranking to each Effect
• See the Severity Definition and Evaluation Criteria in the Potential Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis reference manual.
• The goal for each of the items that multiply to arrive at the Risk Priority Number is to
differentiate between the items in that category. The following figure provides a guideline
for severity rankings. If your situation only uses a small portion of the scale then develop
your own scale to improve the differentiation. If your situation is greater than two tiers back
from the final consumer, then the guideline figure should be adjusted to reflect the effects that
will be felt by your customer’s customer.

Effects of Failure and Severity Ranking Table

Stakeholder Effects of Failure Severity
Consumer Owner Safety Problem 10
(e.g., vehicle buyer)
Major Owner Dissatisfaction (Loss of Owner Loyalty) 8
Moderate Owner Dissatisfaction (Inconvenience) 6
Minor Owner Dissatisfaction (Annoyance) 4
Customer Plant Safety Problem 10
(e.g., vehicle
manufacturer) Possible Recall 9
Line Stoppage 8
Warranty Costs 7
Scrap 7
Regulatory Penalty 7
Moderate Rework (e.g., < 20% or moderate repair) 5
Plant Dissatisfaction 4
Minor Rework (e.g., < 10% or simple repair) 3

F.5.2 Potential Cause(s)/Mechanisms of Failure and Design Matrix

From the Design Matrix (if used), list the high negative impact characteristics as the Potential
Causes/Mechanisms of Failure which are associated with Potential Failure Modes.
Mechanisms are generally described as over or under a certain threshold. These thresholds define the
boundaries of the product approval and subsequent requirements for change notification.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 39 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.5.3 Likelihood of Occurrence Rankings

The following step provides an alternate method for assigning Occurrence ratings.
Rank Occurrence - the ranking scale in the Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis manual is
difficult to relate to bulk materials and generally results in very low numbers with little differentiation in
the ultimate risk. The following matrix is recommended as a replacement. It evaluates the frequency of
occurrence based upon observed evidence the formulator has in the design.
Occurrence Matrix
Formulation FREQUENCY
Occurrence Ranking
Type of Evidence LOW MODERATE HIGH
Actual Experience 1 4 7
Similar Experience 2 5 8
Assumption 3 6 9
No Background 10
Actual Experience: Obtained from appropriate experimentation on the specific final product and the
potential failure mode.
Similar Experience: Based upon similar products or processes and the potential failure model.
Assumption: Based upon a clear understanding of the chemical impact of the material and the
potential failure mode.
Frequency ranking clarifications:
• High is defined as – Repeated failures
• Moderate is defined as – Occasional failures
• Low is defined as – Relatively few failures
F.5.4 Current Design Controls
Design Control: Supplementing the Failure Mode Effects and Analysis manual, bulk material design
controls may also include:
• Designed Experiments (DOE’s) - List experiment #’s
• Customer validation tests and trial runs - e.g., gravelometer panels, fender sprayouts (list
customer reference #’s).
• Test protocols - list Test Methods, Standard Operating Procedures, etc.
• Variation of supplier specifications.
• Formulating practice robust ranges.
Design controls identified by a number should be available so that the relevant content of that control can
be understood.
F.5.5 Likelihood of Detection Rankings
The next step provides an alternate method for assigning Detection rankings.
Rank Detection - the ranking scale in the Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis manual is
difficult to relate to bulk materials and generally results in very low numbers with little differentiation in
the ultimate risk. The following matrix may be used. It evaluates the Detection as the ability of the
current Design Control to actually detect a cause of failure and/or failure mode based upon the assessed

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 40 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Testing Method R&R’s percent of specification range (see the Measurement System Analysis reference
manual) and the quality of evidence.
Detection Matrix:
Detection by Design Testing Method R&R
Control
Quality of Evidence <30% 30% - 100% >100%
DOE (Response Surface 1 2 7
Analysis)
Screening Experiments 3 4 8
Assumption/Experience 5 6 9
No Evidence 10

DOE (Response Surface Analysis): Symmetric design space analyzed with appropriate statistical tools.
Screening Experiments: Screening design or ladder evaluation strategically set to develop
DOE.
Assumption/Experience: Information/data based upon similar products or processes.
Note: The above R&R limits are suggested unless otherwise agreed upon by the customer and
organization. R&R calculations can initially be based using design matrix thresholds.

F.6 Process FMEA (see 2.2.6)

Process FMEA Ranking Tables
Severity Rankings
Severity of Effect Ranking
Very High: Potential failure mode may result in a field failure (9), or constitute a safety 9-10
hazard or noncompliance with a government regulation (10).
High: High degree of customer dissatisfaction due to the nature of the failure. May cause 7-8
serious disruption to subsequent processing of the product or result in the product failing
to meet its sales specifications. Will result in a customer complaint and product return.
Failure is likely to be detected during the customer’s final product testing.
Moderate: Failure causes some customer dissatisfaction and may result in a customer 4-6
complaint or limitation on shelf life. The customer may need to make modifications or
adjustments to their process to accommodate the material. The problem is likely to be
detected as part of an incoming inspection or prior to use (4). The problem will be
detected during processing (5). The problem will be detected in subsequent processing
steps (6).
Low: Failure causing only a slight customer annoyance. Customer will notice only a 2-3
slight deterioration or inconvenience with the product or processing of the product.
Minor: Reasonable to expect that the minor nature of this failure would not cause any real 1
effect on the product or its processing by the customer. Customer will probably not even
notice the failure.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 41 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Occurrence Rankings
Frequency of Failure Ranking
Very High: Failure is almost inevitable. Additional process steps are developed to deal with the 9 - 10
failures.
High: Similar processes have experienced repeated failures. The process is not in statistical control. 7-8
Moderate: Similar processes have experienced occasional failures, but not in major proportions. 4-6
Process is in statistical control.
Low: Similar processes have experienced isolated failures. 3
Very Low: Almost identical processes have experienced only isolated failures. 2
Remote: Failure is unlikely. No failures ever associated with almost identical processes. The 1
process is in statistical control.

Detection Rankings
Likelihood and Location In the Process the Defect Is Detected Ranking
Absolute Certainty of Non-Detection: Controls will not or cannot detect the existence of the defect. 10
Very Low: Organization controls probably will not detect the existence of the defect, but the defect 9
may be detected by the customer.
Low: Controls may detect the existence of the defect, but detection may not occur until packaging is 7-8
underway.
Moderate: Controls likely to detect the existence of the failure, but not until lot acceptance testing 5-6
has been completed. Tests with a higher degree of variability will have the higher ranking.
High: Controls have a good chance of detecting the existence of the defect before the manufacturing 3-4
process has been completed. In-Process testing is used to monitor the manufacturing process.
Very High/Early: Controls will almost certainly detect the existence of the defect before the product 1-2
moves onto the next step in its manufacturing process. Important raw materials are controlled via
organization specifications.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 42 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.7 Special Characteristics

F.7.1 Introduction
If product characteristics/attributes can have normal variation resulting in movement outside their design-
intended robust range which results in significant impact, they are designated special, and must be
controlled by special controls.

Special Characteristics - Clarification Table

Clarification Example

1 Special Characteristics For Bulk Materials, a frequent Illustrations of the flow of

occurrence is a transformation materials through final product
from bulk material to final follow (e.g., % solids Resin A, %
product. UVA intended). These are not
necessarily intended to be Special
Characteristics.
The differences between bulk Examples of product
product characteristics (features characteristics are: viscosity, %
of the supplied product) and the NV Solids, % Resin “A”.
final attributes (features of the Examples of final product
transformed product) should be attributes are: appearance, film
understood. build, FMVSS safety, durability.
During the design phase, the Examples of manufacturing
product characteristics can be process parameters (control
controls for final product characteristics) are: temperature,
attributes. (This does not imply pressure, mix rate, test protocol.
that they are control
characteristics). During
manufacture of the bulk material,
process parameters are the control
characteristics.
During transformation from bulk Examples of customer
product to final product, both bulk transformation process parameters
product characteristics and final (control characteristics) are: fluid
product attributes can be flow, temperature/humidity, air
controlled by customer process pressure.
control characteristics.

2 Symbols for customer-identified Organizations may designate their The organization may choose to
Special Characteristics own internal symbols to designate use “S” (Safety), or “sp” (special),
Special Characteristics in their or “K” (Key), etc.
working documents.
For customer-designated/ The customer designated shield,
identified Special Characteristics, inverted delta, diamond, etc. will
the customer-specific symbols be used when required per
will be used for required customer customer identification.
documentation and required
shipping labels.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 43 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.7.2 Special Characteristics - Elaboration

For clarification purposes, the following figure is intended to demonstrate the flow of potential special
characteristics through the supply chain.

Illustration of the Flow of Materials through Final Product:

Item A (Paint) Item B (Paint) Item C (Sealant)
Supplier (Tier II) Supplier (Tier II) Supplier (Tier II)
Bulk Product Characteristic Bulk Product Characteristic Bulk Product Characteristic
(Raw Material) (Raw Material) (Raw Material)
% Solids Resin “A” Purity Assay of UVA Polymer Viscosity

Supplier (Tier II) Supplier (Tier II) Supplier (Tier II)

Mfg. Control Characteristic Mfg. Control Characteristic Mfg. Control Characteristic

Resin Synthesis Temperature Final Reaction Hold Time End-Blocker Feed Rate

Organization (Tier I) Organization (Tier I) Organization (Tier I)

Bulk Product Characteristic Bulk Product Characteristic Bulk Product Characteristic

Paint Viscosity % UVA Intended % Polymer In Sealant

Organization (Tier I) Organization (Tier I) Organization (Tier I)

Mfg. Control Characteristic Mfg. Control Characteristic Mfg. Control Characteristic

Tank Mix Rate Scale Calibration Polymer Feed Rate

Customer Transformation Customer Transformation Customer Transformation

Control Characteristic Control Characteristic Control Characteristic

% Solvent Reduction Fluid Flow (for film build) Extruder Bead Size

Final Product Attribute Final Product Attribute Final Product Attribute

Film Build: Free of Sags Excellent Durability Leak Free Sealant

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 44 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.8 Control Plan (see 2.2.7)

F.8.1 Introduction
The Bulk Material Control Plan serves as a mechanism to:
• Highlight Special Product/Process Characteristics and their controls
• Link together sources of control methods, instructions and specification/tolerance limits and
reference them in one document
Additionally, this control plan is not intended to recreate specification and/or tolerance limits that exist in
other control sources such as batch tickets, work instructions and testing protocols.

F.8.2 Control Plan - Elaboration

Refer to the customer’s specified control plan format (e.g., that found in the Advanced Product Quality
Planning and Control Plan reference manual).
• Prototype (when required) - A listing of tests, evaluations and their associated
specifications/tolerances used to assess an experimental or developmental formulation. This
may be the only control plan that is product specific.
• Pre-launch - Documentation of the product/process control characteristics, process controls
affecting Special Characteristics, associated tests, and measurement systems employed during
product scale up and prior to normal production.
• Production - Documentation of the product/process control characteristics, process controls
affecting Special Characteristics, associated tests, and measurement systems employed during
normal production. Additional items may be included at the Organization’s discretion.
Pre-launch and production control plans may be applied to a family of products or specific processes.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 45 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.9 Measurement System Analysis (MSA) Studies (see 2.2.8)

Bulk materials often require further processing after sampling in order to make a measurement.
Measurements are often destructive in nature and this prevents retesting the same sample.
Measurement variability is often much larger for properties important in the process industries (e.g.,
viscosity and purity) than it is for properties measured in mechanical industries (e.g., dimensions).
Measurement may account for 50% or more of the total observed variation.
Standardized test methods (e.g., ASTM, AMS, ISO) are often followed. The organization need not re-
verify bias, linearity, stability, and Gage R&R.
MSA studies are not required where standardized tests are used, however it is still important for the
organization to understand the measurement component of variation in the test methods used.
Customer agreement on the actual requirements for MSA for either non-standard test methods or “new-to-
supplier” test methods should be obtained during the planning phase.
Any MSA studies should be applied to each test method associated with Special Characteristics, and not
to each individual product measured by the test method. Therefore, the MSA studies should be conducted
as broadly as possible across all products which use a particular test method. If the resulting variability is
unacceptable, then either the studies should be conducted on a narrower class of products or action should
be taken to improve the test method.

F.10 Initial Process Studies For Special Characteristics (see 2.2.11)

The manufacture of bulk materials consists of industries which span a variety of production processes,
from high volume products to specialty products produced in small quantities no more than once or twice
per year. Often the production process is completed or already in place before sufficient samples can be
tested. By the time the product is made again, personnel and/or equipment may have changed. Also,
these processes have numerous input variables, many control variables, and a variety of product
variations. There are non-linearities – meaning for example that doubling the change in a particular input
does not necessarily double the change in the output. The effects and relationships between all these
variables and controls are also not usually known without error. Multiple processes are usually
interconnected, sometimes with feedback loops. There are also timing considerations and delays in
reaction time. Further, measurements of component variables are generally less precise than
measurements of component parts, such that in many cases correlated variables must be used.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 46 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.11 Master Sample (see 2.2.15)

F.11.1 Introduction
The requirements for master sample or equivalent shall be agreed by the customer and organization.
Physical Sample: Some bulk materials are stable and unchanging over an extended period of time (e.g.,
they do not significantly change physical or chemical composition, if properly stored, for decades). In
this case, a physical sample will serve as a Master Sample.
Analytical Sample Record: Other bulk materials change with time, but can be precisely quantified by
appropriate analytical techniques. In this case the analytical record (e.g., Ultra-Violet or Infra-Red
spectra “fingerprint,” Atomic Absorption or Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric analysis) is an
appropriate Master Sample.
Manufacturing Sample Record: When bulk materials can not be distinctly identified or change over
time, a manufacturing sample record should be generated. The record should include the information
required to manufacture a “normal production size” run (lot or batch), according to the final “Production
Control Plan” supporting the PSW. This record provides an “audit trail” to the information which may be
stored in various documents and or electronic systems. The following is the basic information suggested
to accomplish this task:
• The quantity of product produced.
• The important performance results.
• The raw materials utilized (including manufacturer, Lot # and important properties records).
• The critical equipment required to manufacture the bulk material.
• Analytical sample records, as described above, on the material as produced.
• Batch ticket used to manufacture the bulk material.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 47 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.11.2 Paint Manufacturing Master Sample Record - Examples

The following figures show examples of paint manufacturing master records:

Paint Mfg Master Sample Record – Batch/Lot Mfg. Record

Plant #1 12/5/97 1x97
MFG. LOCATION: _________________ MFG. DATE: ___________Number ______
xxR-yyyy Basecoat White Basecoat
Product Code: _______________ Product Name: ________________ Formula
1/18/97
Date: _______
1000 Gals.
Lbs/Gals Req’d.: __________________

Mixer #2
Equip. ID.: ______________________
TESTING INFORMATION
Name Test Method Specifications
Wt/Gallon TM001 10.50 - 10.70
% Non Volatile TM004 57 - 61%
Viscosity TM003 30 - 40 Secs

Ingredients Amt. Amt. Lot/Tank # Date/Time Operator

Loaded Initials
Add in order, with mixing
Resin A 1000 Lbs 999 Lbs AB345 12/5/97 9:35 AM
Resin B 500 Lbs 501 Lbs. CD678 12/5/97 10:25 AM

Control temperature of mix. Not to exceed 105º F. Temperature recorded = Initials

Crosslinker .
100 Lbs 100 Lbs AC250 12/5/97 10:25 AM

FILLING INSTRUCTIONS
250 Gal Tote
Containers __________________________
25-Micron Bag
Filtering ____________________________
Per Contract
Labeling ____________________________

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 48 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Paint Mfg Master Sample Record – Product Test Results

Product Code: xxR-yyyy Product Name: White Basecoat
Manufacturing location: Plant #1
Date Batch # Batch Size Wt/Gallon % non- Viscosity Initials Remarks
TM001 Volatile TM003
TM004
Gallons 10.50 – 57 – 61% 30 – 40 Secs
10.70
12/5/97 1/97 1000 10.59 59.6 34 OK

Paint Mfg Master Sample Record – Certificate of Analysis Ingredients

Certificate of Analysis
Material Name: Filmformer Resin Lot/Batch #: AB345
Material Code: Resin A
Specification Requirements
Property Min. Max Lot/Batch
Result

% Non Volatile 57% 61% 58.8%

(TM004)
ph 7 7.3 7.2
(TM005)
Certification Signature: _______________________
Date: _____________________________________

F.12 Part Submission Warrant (CFG-1001) [see 2.2.18]

A Part Submission Warrant shall be prepared and submitted for approval when required by the customer.
If a customer agrees that PPAP is not required, no warrant needs to be prepared. The information
required by the Submission Warrant which does not apply to bulk material (e.g., part weight, dimensional
measurement) does not need to be provided.
For those organizations that have been classified as “self certifying” by a specific customer, submission of
a warrant signed only by the organization shall be evidence of PPAP approval, unless the organization is
advised otherwise. For all other organizations, evidence of PPAP approval shall be a warrant signed by
both the authorized customer representative and organization or other customer approval documents.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 49 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.13 Interim Approval (see 5.2.2)

Most products will achieve approval prior to initial use. In cases where approval cannot be obtained, a
“Bulk Material Interim Approval” may be granted. A form is shown on the facing page; other forms may
be used.
COMPLETION OF THE BULK MATERIAL INTERIM APPROVAL FORM
1. ORGANIZATION NAME: Name assigned to Organization’s manufacturing location.
2. PRODUCT NAME: The Organization’s designated name for the product—as identified in the Customer’s Engineering Release
Documents.
3. SUPPLIER/VENDOR CODE: Code (DUNS number or equivalent) assigned to the manufacturing location as shown on the Customer’s
purchase order.
4. ENG. SPEC.: Customer’s identified Specification through which the product is approved and released.
5. MANUF. SITE: Physical address of the manufacturing location as shown on the Customer’s purchase order.
6. PART #: Customer’s Part Number.
7. ENG. CHANGE #: Formula Revision Level or number identifying the formula.
8. FORMULA DATE: Engineering Release Date of the formula identified in item #7.
9. RECEIVED DATE: Customer Use Only.
10. RECEIVED BY: Customer Use Only (Customer Representative).
11. SUBMISSION LEVEL: Submission Level (1-5) that Organization is required to submit to as defined by the Customer.
12. EXPIRATION DATE: Date that the Interim Approval expires.
13. TRACKING CODE: Customer Use Only.
14. RE-SUBMISSION DATE: Date organization will resubmit for production approval.
15. STATUS: For each item, enter appropriate code (NR — Not Required, A — Approved, I — Interim).
16. SPECIFIC QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AUTHORIZED: Utilized when Interim Approval specifies a specific quantity of volume of
product.
17. PRODUCTION TRIAL AUTHORIZATION: Customer’s Engineering Release authorizing the use of the product in the Customer’s
facility.
18. REASON(S) FOR INTERIM APPROVAL: Indicate reason for Interim Request.
19. ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED, EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE: For each item marked as “I” in #15, provide explanatory details
regarding problem issues and furnish a date for problem resolution.
20. ACTIONS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED DURING INTERIM PERIOD, EFFECTIVE DATE: What is being done to ensure defective
product is contained, date when the action was implemented and Exit Criteria necessary to end need for continuing the action or its
individual elements.
21. PROGRESS REVIEW DATE: Update on progress of problem resolution, generally the midpoint from issuance to expiration of the
interim period.
22. DATE MATERIAL DUE TO PLANT: Date material is due to Customer’s site.
23. WHAT ACTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE SUBMISSIONS WILL CONFORM TO ALL PPAP
REQUIREMENTS BY THE SAMPLE PROMISE DATE? Why won’t this happen again?
24. ORGANIZATION: Responsible and Authorized Organization official to ensure compliance to the above mentioned actions and dates.
25. PRODUCT ENG.: Product Engineer’s signature, printed name, phone number, and date.
26. MATERIALS ENG.: Material Engineer’s signature, printed name, phone number, and date.
27. QUALITY ENG.: Quality Engineer’s signature, printed name, phone number, and date.

28. INTERIM APPROVAL NUMBER: Customer Use Only.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 50 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

BULK MATERIAL INTERIM APPROVAL FORM

1 2
SUPPLIER NAME:_______________________________ PRODUCT NAME: _______________________
3 4
SUPPLIER CODE:_______________________________ ENG. SPEC.: ___________________________
5
MANUF. SITE: __________________________________ 6
PART #: _______________________________
7 8
ENG. CHANGE #: _______________________________ FORMULA DATE: _______________________
9 10
RECEIVED DATE:_______________________________ RECEIVED BY:__________________________
11
SUBMISSION LEVEL: ____________________________ 12
EXPIRATION DATE:______________________
13
TRACKING CODE: ______________________________ 14
RE-SUBMISSION DATE: ___________________

STATUS: (NR - Not Required, A - Approved, I - Interim) 15

Design Matrix:________ DFMEA: _____ Special Product Characteristics:__ Engineering Approval: ____
Control Plans ________ PFMEA: _____ Special Process Characteristics: _ Process Flow Diagram: ___
Test Results:_________Process Studies: ___ Dimensional Results: ______ Master Sample: _________
Measurement Systems Studies: Appearance Approval Report:
16
SPECIFIC QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AUTHORIZED (IF APPLICABLE):____________
17
PRODUCTION TRIAL AUTHORIZATION #:___________________________________
REASON(S) FOR INTERIM APPROVAL:_____________________________________
18

______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED, EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE 19
(CLASSIFY AS ENGINEERING, DESIGN, PROCESS, OR OTHER): _______________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
ACTIONS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED DURING INTERIM PERIOD, EFFECTIVE DATE: _
20
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
PROGRESS REVIEW DATE _________
21 DATE MATERIAL DUE TO PLANT: _______
22
WHAT ACTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE SUBMISSIONS
WILL CONFORM TO BULK MATERIAL PPAP REQUIREMENTS BY THE SAMPLE
PROMISE DATE? 23
______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
SUPPLIER (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) 24 PHONE: ______________________
(PRINT NAME) DATE:________________________
CUSTOMER APPROVALS (as needed): PHONE DATE
25
PRODUCT ENG. (SIGNATURE) _________________________________ _______________ _______
(PRINT NAME)_______________________________
26
MATERIALS ENG. (SIGNATURE) ________________________________ ______________ _______
(PRINT NAME)_______________________________
27
QUALITY ENG. (SIGNATURE)___________________________________ ______________ _______
(PRINT NAME)_______________________________
28
INTERIM APPROVAL NUMBER: _________________________________

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 51 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

BULK MATERIAL INTERIM APPROVAL FORM

SUPPLIER NAME:_______________________________ PRODUCT NAME: _______________________
SUPPLIER CODE:_______________________________ ENG. SPEC.: ___________________________
MANUF. SITE: __________________________________ PART #: _______________________________
ENG. CHANGE #: _______________________________ FORMULA DATE: _______________________
RECEIVED DATE:_______________________________ RECEIVED BY:__________________________
SUBMISSION LEVEL: ____________________________ EXPIRATION DATE:______________________
TRACKING CODE: ______________________________ RE-SUBMISSION DATE: __________________

STATUS: (NR - Not Required, A - Approved, I - Interim)

Design Matrix:________ DFMEA: _____ Special Product Characteristics:__ Engineering Approval: ____
Control Plans ________ PFMEA: _____ Special Process Characteristics: _ Process Flow Diagram: ___
Test Results:_________Process Studies: ___ Dimensional Results: ______ Master Sample: _________
Measurement Systems Studies: Appearance Approval Report:

SPECIFIC QUANTITY OF MATERIAL AUTHORIZED (IF APPLICABLE):____________

PRODUCTION TRIAL AUTHORIZATION #:___________________________________
REASON(S) FOR INTERIM APPROVAL:_____________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED, EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE
(CLASSIFY AS ENGINEERING, DESIGN, PROCESS, OR OTHER): _______________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
ACTIONS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED DURING INTERIM PERIOD, EFFECTIVE DATE: _
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
PROGRESS REVIEW DATE _________ DATE MATERIAL DUE TO PLANT: _______
WHAT ACTIONS ARE TAKING PLACE TO ENSURE THAT FUTURE SUBMISSIONS
WILL CONFORM TO BULK MATERIAL PPAP REQUIREMENTS BY THE SAMPLE
PROMISE DATE?
______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
SUPPLIER (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) PHONE: ______________________
(PRINT NAME) DATE:________________________
CUSTOMER APPROVALS (as needed): PHONE DATE
PRODUCT ENG. (SIGNATURE) _________________________________ _______________ _______
(PRINT NAME)_______________________________
MATERIALS ENG. (SIGNATURE) ________________________________ ______________ _______
(PRINT NAME)_______________________________
QUALITY ENG. (SIGNATURE)___________________________________ ______________ _______
(PRINT NAME)_______________________________
INTERIM APPROVAL NUMBER: __________________________________

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 52 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

F.14 Customer Plant Connection

F.14.1 Customer’s Responsibilities

The customer plant connection is a shared responsibility between the organization supplying bulk
material and the customer. This connection defines the interaction of specific customer plant processing
steps with Special Characteristics and final product attributes of the bulk material. This interaction is
especially significant when bulk materials undergo chemical or physical transformation(s). Three key
components of the Customer Plant Connection are the development of a Customer Process Matrix (SEE
FOLLOWING EXAMPLE), determination of Special Characteristics from the Customer Process Matrix,
and the preparation of a Control Plan which systematically directs corrective actions. For bulk materials,
conducting the steps outlined in this “Customer Plant Connection” is highly recommended.
NOTE: It is not the intent of PPAP to compromise proprietary information.
F.14.2 Customer Plant Connection – Clarification
The following is applicable to materials that are transformed from bulk (e.g., wet can of paint) to final
product (e.g., cured paint film). This may not be applicable to all bulk materials (i.e. washer fluid, engine
oil, etc.). It is recognized by the organization that it is their responsibility to deliver the product to the
customer with the characteristics of the bulk material per organization and customer agreement.
The impact of the transformation of bulk materials by the customer plant on final product attributes may
be accounted for in the customer’s application process. During the transformation from bulk product to
final product, both bulk product characteristics and final product attributes may be impacted by customer
process controls.
PPAP does not require a Process FMEA or Control Plan for the customer process. Since the product is
frequently two products (bulk and finished), there is a shared responsibility for the final product attribute.
For example, percent solids and viscosity of a bulk coating which impacts the final coating’s film build
attribute, may be affected by the customer’s mix room percent solvent reduction. The percent reduction
process parameter may therefore be controlled to aid in control of film build. The process steps at
customer plants may be matrixed versus the Special Characteristics (determined jointly by the
organization and the customer). Where high impact is evident, those process steps may be analyzed by
the Process FMEA methodology.
The Special Characteristics may then be determined, and be included in a Control Plan for the customer
process. These special control characteristic items may be monitored and continuously improved.
F.14.3 Customer Plant Connection - Guidelines
The following is a recommended set of guidelines for the customer plant when implementing process
controls for bulk materials.
1. Assemble cross-functional teams of customer personnel for each customer process area.
Include appropriate organization representatives on each team.
2. Select Champions for each team - these are the customer process owners (i.e., chief process
engineer, area supervisor, etc.).
3. Define critical customer handling, application steps and process parameters in each area.
4. Review the organization’s Design Matrix and Design FMEA items for application functions
which have been designated as Special Characteristics. Also review the desired final product
attributes for items needing control.
5. From #4, develop a list of Special Characteristics and Attributes.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 53 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

6. Construct a Customer Process Matrix, using #3 as the top, and #5 as the side of a matrix.
7. Perform a Customer Process FMEA, focusing on the high impact customer process areas
which impact the Special Characteristics. (Do the PFMEA per Appendix F).
8. Determine Special Characteristics from the Customer Process Matrix and PFMEA (e.g., paint
fluid flow, gun distance, etc.).
9. Prepare a Control Plan for each affected customer process area. The plan (utilize current
DaimlerChrysler, Ford, GM APQP guidelines) might contain at a minimum all process steps
containing Special Characteristics.
10. Monitor and record all Special Characteristics by appropriate means (control charts,
checklists, etc.).
11. Ensure stability of Special Characteristics and continuously improve where possible.

Customer Process Matrix Example

Customer Handling, Application Steps and Process Parameters
Special Char. Paint% Paint Gun Gun Gun Gun Gun Booth Booth Bake
& Attributes reduction fluid atomair fan cap distance wash temp humidity temp
flow air box
Dirt Check 1 1 2 2 3 1 3 1 3 1
Film Build 3 3 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1
Sags 2 3 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 2
Popping 2 3 3 2 1 2 1 3 1 3
Peel 3 2 3 2 2 2 1 1 2 2
Hiding 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1
Adhesion 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3
Impact Ratings: 3=high, 2=Medium, 1=Low

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 54 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix G – Tires - Specific Requirements

G.1 Introduction and Applicability

An organization supplying tires shall comply with the requirements of PPAP.
This Appendix is to be used as guidance for clarification of requirements unless otherwise specified by
the authorized OEM customer representative.
Performance testing, based upon design requirements used by each OEM to select tire construction
(technical approval), reduces the need to repeat all tests during PPAP. Specific PPAP confirmation tests
are specified by each OEM.

G.2 Guidelines for PPAP Requirements (Reference Section 2.1)

Significant Production Run (2.1)
Unless otherwise specified by the OEM, the size of the production run for the PPAP parts is a minimum
of 30 tires.
NOTE 1: The above definition applies to all uses of “significant production run” within PPAP.
NOTE 2: The typical development of a new tire design involves multiple builds of a small quantity of
tires. Most designs are basic to the organization’s process. For the tire industry, PPAP is typically
completed with an initial mold or molds, and well in advance of customer requirements for large volume
production.
NOTE 3: The PPAP for the tire industry typically is derived from 1 to 8 hours of tire curing from the
approved production process as specified in the organization’s control plan.
PPAP is not required for additional molds that are brought on line in the approved production process.
All additional molds shall be certified by the organization’s internal certification criteria and
documentation.
NOTE 4: For tires, tooling is defined as the tire mold. This definition of tooling applies to all uses of
“tooling” within PPAP.
Material Test Results (Reference 2.2.10.1)
Testing is applicable only to finished tires and not to raw materials. Tire industry practice does not
require chemical, physical, or metallurgical testing. Material test results are not required for PPAP.
Special Characteristics (Reference 2.2.11.1)
Tire uniformity (force variation) and balance are designated Special Characteristics.
Appearance Approval Report (AAR) (Reference 2.2.13)
The AAR requirement is not applicable.
Master Sample (see 2.2.15 and 2.2.9)
Master samples are not retained.
Process Flow Diagrams
See PPAP 2.2.5.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 55 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Checking Aids (see 2.2.16)

Checking aids are not required.
PPAP Submission Warrant (see 2.2.18)
Reporting of multiple cavities, molds, lines, etc. on the PSW is not required for tires.
Part Weight (Mass) (Reference 2.2.18.1)
PPAP tires are weighed to two (2) significant decimals (xx.xx). The average is reported on the PSW to
four (4) decimals (xx.xxxx).

G.3 Submission to Customer - Levels of Evidence (Reference Section 4 )

Retention/Submission Requirements (Reference Table 4.1)
Records of items submitted (S) and retained (R) are maintained at appropriate locations designated by the
organization.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 56 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Appendix H – Truck Industry - Specific Requirements

Introduction
An organization supplying to subscribing truck OEMs shall comply with the requirements in this
Appendix or use guidance herein for clarification of PPAP. The requirements in this Appendix are
minimums and may be supplemented at the discretion of the organization and/or the customer.

Applicability (see Page 1)

The following additional requirements are added:
• The Customer has the right to request a PPAP at any time to re-qualify a production
component.
• Feature Base Process or Part Number Generated components are PPAP qualified using the
highest content configuration to qualify the master part number. All other configurations may
be approved with the submission of a PSW linking the new part number with the master part
number.
• For bulk material and standard catalog parts, the organization shall formally qualify their
product to their design record and submit a PSW when requested by the customer.

Significant Production Run (see 2.1)

It is important that adequate quantities of parts be manufactured during this run to confirm the quality and
capability of production process at rate prior to full production. It is recognized that in low volume
applications, sample sizes as small as 30 pieces may be utilized for preliminary process capability studies.
When performing the Significant Production Run, all aspects of variability within the production process
should be considered and tested where practicable, e.g., set-up variability or other potential process
related issues identified within the PFMEA.
Sample sizes must be discussed and agreed to early in the APQP process. If projected volumes are so low
that 30 samples are not attainable prior to production, interim PPAP approval may be granted. A
dimensional report with 100% inspection on special characteristics is required during the interim period.
Once the 30 consecutive production samples are produced, measured, and the quality index calculated and
accepted, then the interim approval is changed to approved.

Dimensional Results (see 2.2.9)

The organization shall submit, as part of the PPAP package, a copy of the drawing with each dimension,
test, and or specification identified with a unique number. These unique numbers shall be entered onto the
dimensional or test results sheet as applicable, and actual results entered onto the appropriate sheets. The
organization shall also identify the print zone for each numbered characteristic as applicable.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 57 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Material Test (see 2.2.10.1)

The organization shall also submit a completed Design Verification Plan and Report that summarizes
appropriate performance and functional test results.

Quality Indices (see 2.2.11.2)

When the customer specifies special characteristics and the estimated annual usage is less than 500
pieces, the organization shall document in their control plan that they will either:
• perform 100% inspection and record the results
or
• conduct an initial process capability study with a minimum of 30 production pieces and maintain
SPC control charts of the characteristics during production.
For special characteristics that can be studied using variables data, the organization shall utilize one of the
following techniques to study the stability of the process:
• X-Bar and R Charts, n=5, plot minimum 6 subgroups
or
• Individual X - Moving Range, plot minimum 30 data points
When performing the initial process study, data shall be plotted from consecutive parts taken from the
production trial run. These studies could be augmented or replaced by long-term results from the same or
similar process run on the same equipment with prior customer concurrence.

Master Sample (see 2.2.15)

The master sample shall be retained after PPAP approval when specified by the customer.

Part Submission Warrant (see 2.2.18)

When specified by the customer, organizations shall use the Truck Industry PSW (see the Truck Industry
PSW Form that follows).

Part Weight (mass) (see 2.2.18.1)

The organization may record the part weight of the part submitted on the PSW measured and expressed in
kilograms to four significant figures (e.g., 1000Kg, 100.0Kg, 10.00Kg, and 1.000Kg) unless otherwise
specified by the customer. To determine part weight, the organization shall individually weigh ten
randomly selected parts, and calculate and report the average weight. At least one part shall be measured
from each cavity, tool, lin, or process used in product realization.
Customer Notification (see 3.1)
The organization shall notify the customer of any planned design and process changes. The customer may
subsequently elect to require a submission for PPAP approval. Organizations supplying to subscribing
truck OEMs are required to complete the Product Process Change notification form to advise of
forthcoming process or proprietary product changes.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 58 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Completion of the Part Submission Warrant

PART INFORMATION
1. Part Name: Engineering released finished end item part name.
2. Customer Part Number(s): Engineering released finished end item part number.
3. Part Revision Level: if applicable.
4. Tool Purchase Order Number: if applicable.
5. Engineering Drawing Change Level & Approval Date: Show change level and date for submission.
6. Additional Engineering Changes: Include all authorized engineering change documents and
approval dates not yet incorporated on the drawing but which are incorporated in the part.
7. Shown on Drawing Number: The design record that specifies the customer part number being
submitted.
8. Purchase Order Number: Enter this number as found on the purchase order.
9. Part weight: Enter the actual weight in kilograms to four significant places.
10. Checking Aid Number: Enter the checking aid number, if one is used for dimensional inspection,
and
11. Its Engineering Change Level and Approval Date.
ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION
12. Organization Name and Code: Show the code assigned to the manufacturing location on the
purchase order.
13. Organization Manufacturing Address: Show the complete address of the location where the product
was manufactured.
SUBMISSION INFORMATION
14. Customer Name/Division: Show the corporate name and division or operations group.
15. Contact Name: Enter the name of your customer contact.
16. Application: Enter the model year, vehicle name, or engine, transmission, etc.
17. Check the appropriate box to indicate Substances of Concern/ISO marking reporting.
REASON FOR SUBMISSION
18. Check the appropriate box. Add explanatory details in the “other” section.
REQUESTED SUBMISSION LEVEL
19. Identify the submission level requested by your customer. Check the submission items if a level 4 is
requested.
DECLARATION
20. Explanation/Comments: Provide any explanatory details on the submission results; additional
information may be attached as appropriate.
21. Enter the number or code that identifies the specific mold, cavity, and/or production process used to
manufacture the sample parts.
22. The responsible supplier official, after verifying that the results show conformance to all customer
requirements and that all required documentation is available, shall approve the declaration and
provide Title, Phone Number, Email Address, and Fax Number.
FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY: Leave blank.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 59 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Truck Industry Part Submission Warrant

1 2 3
Part Name Customer Part Number Rev. ___________
If applicable
Engineering Drawing
4 5
Tool PO Number___________________ Change Level Dated
6
Additional Engineering Changes Dated
7 8 9
Shown on Drawing Number Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)

Checking Aid Number 10 Engineering Change Level 11 Dated

ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION SUBMISSION INFORMATION

12 14
________________________________________________
Organization Name and Code Customer Name/Division
13 15
Street Address Customer Contact

16
City State Zip Application

Note: Does this part contain any restricted or reportable substances? Yes No
17
Are plastic parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? Yes No

REASON FOR SUBMISSION (check at least one) 18

Initial Submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or Additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other - please specify below

SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one) 19

Level 1 - Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 2 - Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 4 - Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
(check)
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at supplier's manufacturing location.

DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts and have been made to the applicable customer
drawings and specifications and are made from specified materials on regular production tooling with no operations other than the regular
production process. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review.

EXPLANATION/COMMENTS 20

21
List Molds / Cavities / Production Processes

Organization Authorized Signature 22 Date

Print Name Phone No. Fax

Title E-mail

FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY

PPAP Warrant Disposition:
Approved Rejected
Comment:
Interim Approval

Customer Signature Date

Print Name
March
2006
THE-1001

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 60 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Truck Industry Part Submission Warrant

Part Name Customer Part Number Rev. ______________
If applicable
Engineering Drawing
Tool PO Number___________________ Change Level Dated

Additional Engineering Changes Dated

Shown on Drawing Number Purchase Order No. Weight (kg)

Checking Aid Number Engineering Change Level Dated

ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION SUBMISSION INFORMATION

________________________________________________
Organization Name and Code Customer Name/Division

Street Address Customer Contact

City State Zip Application

Note: Does this part contain any restricted or reportable substances? Yes No

Are plastic parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? Yes No

REASON FOR SUBMISSION (check at least one)

Initial Submission Change to Optional Construction or Material
Engineering Change(s) Sub-Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, orAdditional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other - please specify below

SUBMISSION LEVEL (Check one)

Level 1 - Warrant only (and for designated appearance items, an Appearance Approval Report) submitted to customer.
Level 2 - Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 3 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data submitted to customer.
Level 4 - Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
(check)
Level 5 - Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data reviewed at supplier's manufacturing location.

DECLARATION
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts and have been made to the applicable customer
drawings and specifications and are made from specified materials on regular production tooling with no operations other than the regular
production process. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review.

EXPLANATION/COMMENTS

List Molds / Cavities / Production Processes

Organization Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Phone No. Fax

Title E-mail

FOR CUSTOMER USE ONLY

PPAP Warrant Disposition:
Approved Rejected
Comment:
Interim Approval

Customer Signature Date

Print Name
March
2006
THE-1001

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 61 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

Completion of the Process / Product Change Notification

1. To: Customer contact name.

2. Customer: Customer name.
3. Organization Part Number: The salable part number to undergo a product or process change.
4. Engineering Revision Level: The Organization drawing revision level and date.
5. Customer Part Number: Customer part number (if applicable).
6. Engineering Revision Level: The Customer drawing revision level and date.
7. Purchase Order Number: Customer's Purchase Order number.
8. Application: Enter the model year, vehicle name, or engine, transmission, etc.
9. Safety and or government regulation: Does component have safety and/or government regulations
associated? (Yes / No).
ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION
10. Name: Input the name and address of the company that is/will manufacture the component.
11. Code: Customer assigned number for organization selling the component.
12. Customer Plant(s) affected: List customer plants where product is used.
13. Change Type: Check all the properties that may be affected by the change.
14. Design Responsibility: Check if the organization or Customer has design responsibility.
15. Organization Change That May Affect End Item: Check applicable boxes for a product change.
16. Expected PPAP Completion/Submission Date: Estimate the date that the Organization will have
their internal qualifications complete.
17. Detailed Description of Change: Specific information describing the Organization's product change
or process change.
18. Planned Implementation Date: Input the planned date to be in production with the change.
DECLARATION
19. Explanation/Comments: Include any additional explanation or comments here.
20. Name: Name of person agreeing with the declaration and submitting PPCN.
21. Title: Business title of the person signing the declaration.
22. Business Phone number: Telephone number where person signing the declaration can be reached.
23. Business Fax number: Fax number of the person signing the declaration.
24. Email address: E-mail address of the person signing the declaration.
25. Date: Date the PPCN is signed.

Other required un-numbered document information should be self-explanatory. If further clarification is

necessary, please contact your customer representative.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 62 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PRODUCT / PROCESS CHANGE NOTIFICATION

Complete this form and email to your customer organization whenever customer notification is required by the PPAP
Manual in Table 3.1. Your customer will respond back with an acknowledgement and may request additional change
clarification or PPAP submission requirements.
1 2
To: __________________________________ Customer: _______________________________________________
3 4
Organization Part Number: ________________________ Engineering Revision Level: ________ Dated: ____________

5
Customer Part Number: __________________________ 6
Engineering Revision Level: ________ Dated: ____________

7
Purchase Order Number: _________________________ 9 Safety and/or government regulation: _______
8
Application: ___________________________

ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION

10 11
Name: ___________________________________________ Code: _____________________
Street Address: ___________________________________________
City, State & Zip: ___________________________________ 13 Change Type (check all that apply)
Dimensional
12
Customer Plants Affected: _ __________________________________ Materials
Functional
Design Responsibility: 14 Customer Organization Appearance

Organization Change That May Affect End Item: 15

Product Change Engineering Drawing Change New or Revised Subcomponent

16
Expected PPAP Completion/Submission Date: _____________________________________

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT/PROCESS CHANGE: 17

Planned Date of Implementation: ______________________________ 18

DECLARATION:
I hereby certify that representative samples will be manufactured using the revised product and/or process and verified,
where appropriate, for dimensional change, appearance change, physical property change, functionally for
performance and durability. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for
customer review.
19
Explanation/Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________

20 21
NAME: _________________________________________ TITLE: __________________________________________
22 23
BUSINESS PHONE NO: ____________________________________ FAX NO: _____________________________
24 25
E-MAIL: ________________________________________ DATE: _______________________________

NOTE: Please submit this notification at least 6 weeks prior to the planned change implementation!

Contact your customer to determine if this form is available in an electronic format or if this form should be faxed.
March
2006
THE-1002

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 63 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PRODUCT / PROCESS CHANGE NOTIFICATION

Complete this form and email to your customer organization whenever customer notification is required by the PPAP
Manual in Table 3.1. Your customer will respond back with an acknowledgement and may request additional change
clarification or PPAP submission requirements.

To: __________________________________ Customer: _______________________________________________

Organization Part Number: ________________________ Engineering Revision Level: ________ Dated: ____________

Customer Part Number: __________________________ Engineering Revision Level: ________ Dated: ____________

Purchase Order Number: _________________________ Safety and/or government regulation: _______

Application: ___________________________ Types: ________________________________________

ORGANIZATION MANUFACTURING INFORMATION

Name: ___________________________________________ Code: _____________________

Street Address: ___________________________________________
City, State & Zip: ___________________________________ Change Type (check all that apply)
Dimensional
Customer Plants Affected: _ __________________________________ Materials
Functional
Design Responsibility: Customer Organization Appearance

Organization Change That May Affect End Item:

Product Change Engineering Drawing Change New or Revised Subcomponent

Expected PPAP Completion/Submission Date: _____________________________________

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRODUCT/PROCESS CHANGE:

Planned Date of Implementation: ______________________________

DECLARATION:
I hereby certify that representative samples will be manufactured using the revised product and/or process and verified,
where appropriate, for dimensional change, appearance change, physical property change, functionally for
performance and durability. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for
customer review.

Explanation/Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________

NAME: _________________________________________ TITLE: __________________________________________

BUSINESS PHONE NO: ____________________________________ FAX NO: _____________________________

E-MAIL: ________________________________________ DATE: _______________________________

NOTE: Please submit this notification at least 6 weeks prior to the planned change implementation!

Contact your customer to determine if this form is available in an electronic format or if this form should be faxed.
March
2006
THE-1002

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 64 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

GLOSSARY
ACCREDITED LABORATORY is one that has been reviewed and approved by a nationally-
recognized accreditation body or, as an alternative, a customer recognized accreditation body, conforming
to ISO/IEC Guide 58 for calibration or test laboratory accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025, or national
equivalent.
ACTIVE PART is one currently being supplied to the customer for original equipment or service
applications. The part remains active until tooling scrap authorization is given by the appropriate
customer activity. For parts with no customer-owned tooling or situations where multiple parts are made
from the same tool, written confirmation from the customer Purchasing activity is required to deactivate a
part.
NOTE: For bulk material, “active part” refers to the bulk material contracted, not the parts that
are subsequently produced from that material.
APPEARANCE ITEM is a product that is visible once the vehicle is completed. Certain customers will
identify appearance items on the engineering drawings. In these cases, special approval for appearance
(color, grain, texture, etc.) is required prior to production part submission.
APPROVED is used in PPAP to mean that the parts, materials, and/or related documentation (or records
submitted to, or reviewed by, the customer) meet all customer requirements. After approval or interim
approval, the organization is authorized to ship product as directed by the customer.
APPROVED DRAWING is an engineering drawing signed by the engineer and released through the
customer’s system.
APPROVED MATERIALS are materials governed either by industry standard specifications (e.g., SAE,
ASTM, DIN, ISO) or by customer specifications.
APPROVED SOURCE LIST is a list of the organizations and suppliers that have been found to be
acceptable to the customer. Utilizing product from an approved supplier does not relieve the organization
of responsibility for the quality of that product.
ATTRIBUTE DATA are qualitative data that can be counted for recording and analysis. Examples
include the presence or absence of a required label, the installation of all required fasteners.
AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER REPRESENTATIVE(S) is the individual or individuals having
approval authority on behalf of the customer.
NOTE: The customer’s process should identify the approval authority.
BLACK BOX refers to a part (e.g., an assembly, electrical device, mechanical device, or control module)
where design responsibility belongs to the organization or the supplier. Black Box requirements are
generally limited to those characteristics/items required for customer interface connections and
verification of functional requirements. “O.D.D.” (Outside Design and Development) has the equivalent
meaning.
BULK MATERIAL is a substance (e.g., non-dimensional solid, liquid, gas) such as adhesives, sealants,
chemicals, coatings, fabrics, lubricants, etc. A bulk material may become production material if issued a
customer production part number (see PRODUCTION MATERIAL).
BULK MATERIALS REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST defines the customer PPAP requirements for
bulk material. (see Appendix F).
CAD/CAM MATH DATA is a form of design record by which all dimensional information necessary to
define a product is conveyed electronically. When this design record is used, the organization is
responsible for obtaining a drawing to convey results of dimensional inspection.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 65 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

CALIBRATION is a set of operations which compares values taken from a piece of inspection,
measuring and test equipment or a gage to a known standard under specified conditions.
CAPABILITY is the total range of inherent variation in a stable process. (see the Statistical Process
Control reference manual)
CHECKED PRINT is a released engineering drawing with actual measurement results recorded by the
organization adjacent to each drawing dimension and other requirements.
CONFORMANCE means that the part or material meets the customer’s specifications and requirements.
CONTROL - see STATISTICAL CONTROL.
CONTROL CHARTS – see the Statistical Process Control reference manual.
CONTROL PLANS are written descriptions of the system for controlling production parts or bulk
materials and processes. They are written by organizations to address the important characteristics and
engineering requirements of the product. Each part must have a Control Plan, but in many cases,
“family” Control Plans can apply to a number of parts produced using a common process. Refer to
Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan reference manual, ISO/TS 16949, and
customer-specific requirements.
CUSTOMER is the recipient of the organization's or supplier’s product or service.
DESIGN-INTENDED ROBUST RANGE are limits within which parameters may be allowed to vary
while still ensuring that a product complies with fitness for use requirements.
DESIGN RECORD is the part drawing, specifications, and/or electronic (CAD) data used to convey
information necessary to produce a product.
FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) is a systematic group of activities intended to:
(a) recognize and evaluate the potential failure of a product/process and the effects of that failure, (b)
identify actions that could eliminate or reduce the chance of the potential failure occurring, and (c)
document the entire process. It is complementary to the process of defining what a design or process
must do to satisfy the customer. Refer to Potential Failure Modes and Effects Analysis reference
manual.
INITIAL PROCESS STUDY – see the Statistical Process Control reference manual.
LABORATORY is a test facility that may include chemical, metallurgical, dimensional, physical,
electrical, reliability testing or test validation.
LABORATORY SCOPE is quality record containing the following:
• the specific tests, evaluations and calibrations an organization’s laboratory has the ability and
competency to perform
• a list of the equipment which it uses to perform the above
• a list of the methods and standards to which it performs the above.
MARKED PRINT is an engineering drawing modified, signed, and dated by the customer engineer
(the engineering change number must be included).
ORGANIZATIONS are providers of: a) production materials, b) production or service parts, c)
assemblies, or d) heat treating, welding, painting, plating or other finishing services, directly to the OEM
or other customers requiring this document.
PART SUBMISSION WARRANT (PSW) is an industry-standard document required for all newly-
tooled or revised products in which the organization confirms that inspections and tests on production
parts show conformance to customer requirements.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 66 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

PERISHABLE TOOLS are drill bits, cutters, inserts, etc. used to produce a product and which are
consumed in the process.
PROCESS is a set of interrelated or interacting activities which transforms inputs into outputs.
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM is a schematic representation of the process flow.
NOTE 1: For PPAP, the process flow diagram should focus upon the manufacturing process,
including rework and repair.
NOTE 2: Process flow diagrams can apply to any aspect of the business.
PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT is the manufacturing location within the production site which
includes the production tooling, gaging, process, materials, operators, environment, and process settings,
e.g., feeds, speeds, cycle times, pressures, temperatures, quoted line rate. Environment is defined as all of
the process conditions surrounding or affecting the manufacture and quality of a part or product.
Environment will vary for each site, but generally includes: housekeeping, lighting, noise, HVAC, ESD
controls, and safety hazards relating to housekeeping.
PRODUCTION MATERIAL is material which has been issued a production part number by the
customer and is shipped directly to the customer.
PRODUCTION PART is manufactured at the production site using the production tooling, gaging,
process, materials, operators, environment, and process settings, e.g., feeds/speeds/cycle
times/pressures/temperatures.
PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL SUBMISSION is based on specified quantities of production
parts or production materials taken from the significant production run made with production tooling,
processes, and cycle times. These parts or materials submitted for production part approval are to be
verified by the organization as meeting all specified requirements from the design record.
PRODUCTION RATE is the agreed upon number of parts produced in a planned time period to meet
customer assembly or manufacturing plant production volume requirements - with consideration of other
product mix and machine availability.
NOTE: The agreed production rate is typically specified in the purchase agreement.
QUALITY INDICES are measures of capability or performance for either product or process, such as
Cpk or Ppk. See the Statistical Process Control reference manual.
QUALITY PLANNING is a structured process for defining the methods (e.g., measurements, tests) that
will be used in the production of a specific product or family of products (e.g., parts, materials). Quality
planning embodies the concepts of defect prevention and continual improvement as contrasted with defect
detection (see Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan reference manual).
QUALITY RECORD is a document stating results achieved or providing evidence of activities
performed, e.g., test results, internal audit results, calibration data.
REGULAR PRODUCTION TOOLING is the tooling with which the manufacturer intends to produce
production product.
SALEABLE PRODUCT/PART - refers to the product/part specified on the contract between the
customer and organization.
SIGNIFICANT PRODUCTION RUN - see PPAP, 2.1.
SITE is a location at which value-added manufacturing processes occur.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 67 Revision Date: November 30, 2005
 REVIEW COPY TO IAN BROOK - CUMMINS

SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS are product characteristics or manufacturing process parameters

which can affect safety or compliance with regulations, fit, function, performance or subsequent
processing of product. Refer to customer-specific requirements.
SPECIFICATION is a document stating requirements.
NOTE: For PPAP, every feature of the product as identified by engineering specifications must
meet requirements. Actual measurement and test results are required. Specifications should not
be confused with control limits which represent “the voice of the process.”
STABLE PROCESSES are processes that are in statistical control. See the Statistical Process Control
reference manual.
STATISTICAL CONTROL is the condition of a process from which all special causes of variation have
been eliminated and only common causes remain. See the Statistical Process Control reference manual.
SUBMISSION LEVEL refers to the level of evidence required for PPAP submission (see PPAP, 4.1).
SUPPLIERS are providers of production materials, or production or service parts, assemblies, heat
treating, welding, painting, plating or other finishing services directly to an organization supplying the
OEM or other customers requiring this document.
TOOL is defined as the portion of process machinery which is specific to a component or sub-assembly.
Tools (or tooling) are used in process machinery to transform raw material into a finished part or
assembly.
VALIDATION is confirmation, through the provision of objective evidence, that the requirements for a
specific intended use or application have been fulfilled.
VARIABLES DATA are quantitative data, where measurements are used for analysis. Examples include
the diameter of a bearing journal in millimeters, the closing effort of a door in Newtons, the concentration
of electrolyte in percent, or the torque of a fastener in Newton-meters.
VERIFICATION is confirmation, through the provision of objective evidence, that specified
requirements have been fulfilled
WARRANT - See Part Submission Warrant.

PPAP 4th Edition Final OEM Review Edition 68 Revision Date: November 30, 2005