Science, Technology & Society in Ancient Times
Science, Technology & Society in Ancient Times
                Overview
                For thousand years ago, mankind had assumed that the world
                around them, the Sun, the Moon and the Stars, were Gods and
                spirits. Believing they were recording messages from their Gods,
                ancient civilization such as the Babylonians, had gathered great
                catalogues of astronomical data. The detailed astronomical
                calendar from Babylon records the rising and falling of the
                                                                                              Life & Works of
                constellations and the gods they represented. This knowledge and              Pre-Socratic
                study of the heavens have been slowly spreading across the                    Philosophers
                ancient world until it reached the Greek colonies on the coast
                Miletus-in modern day is known as Turkey. There’s a chattering
                change occurred. The Greeks took this astronomical knowledge                  Life & Works of
                and transformed it; they took the Gods out of heavens and                     Socrates, Plato &
                replaced them with reason. Gradually the Greeks begin to say,                 Aristotle
                these are not persons, these are things. There’s an orderly world
                which the human mind can actually capture; it is subject to our
                understanding. These Greeks began to calculate and predict the                Inventions in
                movement of the moon and stars through mathematics and logic                  Ancient Times
                rather than using gods and spirits to explain everything. It was then
                the birth of ancient Greek Science.
                                                                                              Impact of
                Objectives                                                                    Ancient
                                                                                              Technology to
                At the end of the lesson, you should be able to                               Society
                  Lecture Notes
                  The Greeks began to calculate and predict the movement of the moon and stars through
                  mathematics and logic rather than using gods and spirits to explain everything. It was then
                  the birth of ancient Greek Science. The ancient Greek science is about the attempts to explain
                  and understand the natural world, which would include how things are made of, how the
                  world began if it did began or if it all has always been here.
                                                  Thales
                                                  Miletus
                                                  624-546 BC
                                                  Founder of Ionian school
                                                  Theoretician of geometry
                                                  Stated that the origin of all matter (arché) is water.
                                                  Also believed that the Earth rests on water.
                                                  First predicted the solar eclipse before it happened (May 28, 585 BC).
                    Thales, the rst Greek philosopher and                      was the title given by Greek tradition to
                    father of Western philosophy, was born in                  seven wise ancient Greek men who were
                    the city of Miletus, an ancient Greek Ionian               philosophers, statesmen and law-givers.
                    city on the western coast of Asia Minor in                 The Seven Sages are known for their
                    today’s Turkey. His father was Examyes and                 practical wisdom which "consisted of short
                    his mother was Cleobuline. According to                    and memorable pronouncement”. For
                    some sources, Thales was married and had                   example, Thales said “To bring surety
                    a son named Cybisthus but according to                     brings ruin." This saying was interpreted
                    others, he never married and adopted his                   by Diogenes Laertius (biographer of
                    nephew Cybisthus. He died at the age of                    ancient Greeks philosophers) as “Beware
                    78.He was recognized as one of the Seven                   of committing yourself to false opinion” or
                    Sages of Greece; Seven Sages of Greece                     “Beware of false certainty”.
        fi
             
             fi
                     fi
                               
                  Thales main contribution lies in trying to      (rule #2) form by itself; it can evaporate
                  provide scienti c explanation behind            even no one
                  worldly phenomenon that had been                heat up the
                  previously explained by mythological            water. For
                  beliefs. His biggest questions about the        instance, if you
                  universe were “ What is the universe made       let a glass of
                  of”? and “ What is the arché of                 water to stand
                  everything”? According to him, the              on top of the
                  following are the rules in nding arché;         table for quite
                                                                  some time, you
                     1. It has to explain existence. This         will notice that
                        means to say that an arche can            the level of water
                        explain why anything exists and had       decreases; this is
                        to have a cause and ground for its        evident that           Thales believed that water
                        existence,                                water can              can change form by itself.
                                                                  change its form
                     2. It has to explain change. In other        by itself. Furthermore, water can freeze or
                        words, an arché had to be a cause of      condensate by itself, too, which also shows
                        change,                                   that water has the capacity to change its
                                                                  form by itself. Therefore, we could say that
                                                                  anything in the universe that change into
                     3. It had to explain motion. This means
                                                                  solid, liquid or gas is made of water.
                        that an arché can explain the change
                        in place of things, and
                                                                  Since water can move by itself, just like in a
                                                                  river, and it can cause motion as well-
                     4. It has to explain life. Life of things
                                                                  stones, pebbles, fallen leaves or even
                        had to be explained by arché.
                                                                  boats can be displaced by water in a river-
        fl
             fi
                         
                                 fi
                                      
            the river to exist in the universe; hence, if           believed that when Poseidon (the god of
            water is not owing or moving by itself in a             the sea) strike his trident on the ground it
            river, then the river will not exist at all. Did        triggered earthquakes. In contrast to this
            you get it? If you have any question for                belief, Thales explained, more rationally,
            clari cation, just send your queries through            that because the earth is oating in an
            email or text/private messaging.                        expanse of water, earthquakes occurs
                                                                    when the water becomes turbulent.
            Based from Thales’ belief that for a
            substance to become an arché, it has to
            explain life (rule #4). Such idea can explain
            the existence of living things like plants,
            and animals including human beings; that
            is, they were originated and made from
            water that’s why they exist in the universe.
                                                                    Thales believed that the Earth is a flat disc that floats
            Remember that plants need water to grow
                                                                    in water.
            and stay alive. Similarly, animals need fresh
            water for their bodies to function. Actually,
                                                                    Thales is also acclaimed for having
            water is vital in the regulation of body
                                                                    predicted an eclipse of the sun that
            temperature, nutrient uptake, removing
                                                                    occurred on 28 May 585 B.C.E. During this
            wastes, body weight, and health. Losing
                                                                    time, the soldiers of Lydia, now Turkey, and
            one tenth of the body’s water can results in
                                                                    Medes (ancient Iranian people) were
            death as the body will shut down. In other
                                                                    engaged in battle when the sky suddenly
                                                                    turned dark and the entire battle eld and
                                                                    the surrounding countryside were
                                                                    plunged into darkness. The men on both
                                                                    sides of the front line were frightened and
                                                                    surprised. They stood in shock during the
                                                                    duration of the eclipse, which lasted only a
                                                                    few minutes. When the moon moved from
                                                                    in front of the Sun and the daylight
                                                                    returned to the land, the scared soldiers
             Living things were originated from water and require   threw down their weapons and declared
             water to stay alive, according to the idea of Thales
             about arche .
                                        fi
                                             
                       an end to the war. A cease re between                          However, what is certain is that the
                       them soon followed. The accuracy of                            celestial event was frightening and
                       Thales’ prediction of the eclipse will                         astonishing enough to end years of
                       remain a subject for debate because did                         ghting between the Lydians and the
                       not have the scienti c instruments needed                      Medes. 
                       to calculate an eclipse, accurately.
                                                             Anaximander
                                                             Miletus
                                                             610 - 546 BC
                                                             Rejected Thale’s claim that this arché is water.
First cartographer.
                       Anaximander was born in 610 BC in the                          global representation of the known world
                       Ancient Greek city of Miletus (now in                          to increase knowledge for himself and his
                       Turkey). His father’s name was Praxiades.                      peers. 
                       His mother’s name is not known. Little is
                       known about his early life but it is believed                  Anaximander believed that the inhabited
                       that he was a student of the Greek                             portion of the Earth was at and it was
                       philosopher Thales of Miletus.                                 made up of
                                                                                      the top face
                       Anaximander contributed to the                                 of a cylinder
                       development of early geography and                             where the
                       cartography-the science of drawing maps.                       diameter is
                       In fact, he was credited in designing the                      three times
                         rst published map. It is believed that                       the height
                       Anaximander created this map for a                             of cylinder.
                                                                                                      The idea of Anaximander about the
                       several reasons. One of which was to                           He also         shape of the Earth.
                       improve navigation between the colonies                        stated that
                       of Miletus and other colonies around the                       the Earth’s
                       Mediterranean and Black seas. Another                          position was not supported by anything
                       reason was to show the known world to                          and it simply remained in place because it
                       other colonies in an attempt to make them                      was equidistant from all other things.
                       want to join the Ionian city-states. And
                       lastly, Anaximander wanted to show a
                 	
                             fi
                                   
                                       fl
                                            fi
                                                 
                                                                         fi
        GEC08-SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY                                                            HISTORY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
               In addition to the structure of the Earth                       the vent or opening was. The different
               itself, Anaximander was also interested in                      phases of the moon and eclipses were a
               the structure of the cosmos, the origin of                      result of the vents closing.
               the world and evolution. He believed that
                                                                               Anaximander rejected the idea of Thales
               the sun, moon and stars were not objects
                                                                               that arché is water and believed that the
               but hollow rings lled with re, which is
                                                                               source or origin (arché) of everything is
               covered with thick and dark clouds. In the
                                                                               apeiron, which means boundless or
               cosmological model he proposed, the
                                                                               unlimited. According to his theory, the
               rings were hidden from view except
                                                                               apeiron is unde ned and ever moving. It
               through vents or holes and stars were
                                                                               also gave the idea that apeiron is a mixture
               the light of this re that could be seen
                                                                               of two opposites like warm and cold, and
               through the openings. This model could
                                                                               moist and dry. Relative to these opposites,
               also explain the phases of the Moon; its
                                                                               Anaximander posits the following picture:
               phase depended on how wide or narrow
                                                                                 The Unbounded (apeiron) moves with
                                                                                 eternal motion (because it is alive,
                                                                                 remember Thales’ principle about life
                                                                                 and motion). As the Unbounded moves,
                                                                                 something separate from it and from
                                                                                 this something, in turn, hot and cold
                                                                                 separate off. Hot becomes re, which
                                                                                 then form the sun and other heavenly
                                                                                 bodies. Cold becomes dark mist which
               Anaximander’s model of the Universe. The Sun, the                 then forms earth and air, both of which
               Moon and each of the stars is actually a transparent              originally moist but are dried off by re.
               ring – or hoop – made of air. Each ring is filled with
               fire which we can only see when the hole in that
               particular ring passes over us.
                                                             Anaximenes
                                                             Miletus
                                                             585-528 BC
         fi
          fi
               fi
                    
                                fi
                                     fi
                                          fl
                                               fi
                                                    
                                                        fl
                                       GEC08-SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY                                                       HISTORY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
                                            Almost nothing is known of Anaximenes’              meant that air would become thinner; the
                                            life except, as noted, that he was the son          most rare ed alteration of air would be
                                            of Eurystratos of Miletus and                        re. In condensation, Anaximenes meant
                                            contemporary and a student of                       that air would become more concentrated,
                                            Anaximander. The events of his life may be          becoming water and then eventually solid
                                            unknown but the effects of his theory on            materials like stone. It's not exactly clear
                                            air as arché of everything in the universe          how this process occurred, but we know
                                            were wide-reaching. Differing from Thales,          that Anaximenes thought air was
                                            who claimed water was the source of all             constantly in motion, and somehow this
                                            things, or Anaximander, who cited 'the              motion resulted in rarefaction or
                                            boundless in nite’, Anaximenes believed             condensation.
                                            air was the arché, meaning that air is an
                                                                                                Remember the rules in nding arché
                                            eternal, original substance from which the
                                                                                                according to Thales? That is, arché can
                                            physical universe was formed. We may ask,
                                                                                                explain existence, change, motion and life.
                                            'But why air?' Well, Anaximenes used
                                                                                                Let’s nd out whether air could be an
                                            scienti c reasoning to observe that living
                                                                                                arché. As mentioned earlier, Anaximenes
                                            things needed to breathe air in order to
                                                                                                explained that air became other physical
                                            survive. Therefore, Anaximenes concluded
                                                                                                things by rarefaction and condensation;
                                            that air must be the original source of life
                                                                                                and eventually when air is rare ed it turns
                                            and all physical things.
                                                                                                to re and when condensed it turns to
                                                                                According to    wind, wind to cloud, cloud to water, water
                                                                                Anaximenes,     to earth and earth to stone. So, this is
                                                                                air became      evident that because these physical things
                                                                                other           have air, they exist; moreover, air is
                                                                                physical        capable to change through rarefaction
                                                                                things by       and condensation. Furthermore, in
                                                                                altering its
                                                                                state and
                                                                                texture
                                                                                through a
                                             Air as an arché become other       process
                                             physical things by rarefaction or called
                                             condensation
                                                                               rarefaction or
                                                                               condensation.
                                            Using these contrary processes of
                                            rarefaction and condensation, Anaximenes
                                            explained how air is part of a series of
                                            changes. Fire turns to air, air to wind, wind
                                                                                                 Air differs in essence in accordance with its rarity or
                                            to cloud, cloud to water, water to earth and
                                                                                                 density. When it is thinned it becomes fire, while
                                            earth to stone. Matter can travel this path          when it is condensed it becomes wind, then cloud,
                                            by being condensed, or the reverse path              when still more condensed it becomes water, then
                                            from stones to re by being successively              earth, then stones. Everything else comes from these
                                            more rare ed. In rarefaction, Anaximenes
                                       fi
                                                    
                                                        fi
                                                               fi
                            GEC08-SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY                                                     HISTORY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
                              rarefaction, particles move farther apart                    thunder and lightning result from wind
                              from each other while closer during the
                              condensation process; therefore air is
                              moving. Lastly, air was comparable to soul
                              and, just as one's breath gave an
                              individual life, so air, Anaximenes claimed,
                              gave life to all observable phenomena.
                                                                    Heraclitus
                                                                    Ephesus                          Believed that re gave rise to all
                                                                                                     things and everything is in ux.
                                                                    535 - 475 BC
                              Heraclitus was the son of Herakon, a                         by a general contempt for mankind which
                              descendant of Androclus, the founder of a                    coupled with the obscure nature of his
                              great Ionian dynasty of that period, which                   works earned him the nickname the
                              ruled the region. Born into an aristocratic                  “Weeping Philosopher” or Mournful
                              family, he described himself as self-taught                  Thinker”. He was also known to his
                              and was ruthless in his criticism of his                     contemporaries as the “dark” philosopher,
                              predecessors and contemporary thinkers                       so-called because his writings were so
                              and philosophers. He was a loner who                         dif cult to understand.
                              suffered from melancholia for a period of
                                                                                           He believed in the universal ux, i.e.
                              time, which prevented him from
                                                                                           everything is constantly changing, and in
                              completing several of his works. As a
                                                                                           unity of opposites as suggested by his
                              youngster, he used to play knucklebones
                                                                                           saying such as, “The way up and the way
                              with other youths in a temple and
                                                                                           down are one and the same. Living and
                              considered kingship duties a burden. He
                                                                                           dead, waking and sleeping, young and
                              abdicated the throne in favor of his
                                                                                           old, are the same.” These things are the
                              brother. His personality was characterized
                                                                                           “same” in that they are all subject to
                  fl
                       
                       fi
                                fi
                                         
                                             fl
                                                  fl
                                                       
                                                           fl
                                                                
                                      change, arise from one change to vanish                      having constantly shifting water that the
                                      into another and all things, constantly, are                 river exists as a river rather than a pond or
                                      in ux and are, in that regard, the same.                     a lake. Similarly, the universe remains
                                      Heraclitus saw change as the only constant                   harmoniously stable even as the elements
                                      in the world.                                                within undergo constant transformation,
                                                                                                   and it is only by virtue of these constant
                                      He is often quoted as saying that
                                                                                                   changes that our universe exists in the way
                                      “one cannot step twice into the same
                                                                                                   that it does.
                                      river”. This statement is an analogy for his
                                      belief that everything is constantly                         Heraclitus noted that society is similar to a
                                      changing. What he was really suggesting                      river in that it constantly changes. This is
                                      is that rivers can stay the same over                        also true of interpersonal relationships as
                                      time even though the waters in it change.                    these change based on the history
                                      This idea, that the water and life within a                  between two people. Just as no two
                                      river are always changing, even if the river                 situations are exactly the same, each
                                      looks the same, can be applied to life in                    situation is different based on what
                                      general. People are never the same,                          happened before. Heraclitus wants others
                                      changing in some way from our day-to-day                     to know that each interaction one has in
                                      experiences, and same with society.                          society has implications for the future.
                                      This statement from the Greek                                According to Heraclitus, re was the most
                                      philosopher Heraclitus means that the                        basic element and
                                      world constantly changes and that no two                     all other elements
                                      situations are exactly the same. Just as                     originated from re,
                                      water ows in a river, one cannot touch the                   thus, it is re that
                                      exact same water twice when one steps                        gave rise to all
                                      into a river. The water one touched                          things. But why did
                                      previously will be downstream while one                      Heraclitus believed
                                      steps in water from up the stream. This                      that re is the origin
                                      water may or may not have been touched                       of all things in the
                                      by someone else. This is not to say that the                 universe? Actually,
                                      river insofar as it is a river has changed. It               Heraclitus used
                                      is the elements that make up the river that                  many analogies and word pictures to
                                      have shifted. In fact, it is only by virtue of               explain his views and he does not mean to
                                                                                                   say that all things literally come from re.
                                                                                                   Instead, this world order, much like re, is
                                                                                                   constantly changing, transforming
                                                                                                   eternally. He sees the universe as being
                                                                                                   involved in a continual change. Everything
                                                                                                   is born by the death of something else
                                                                                                   like, ame in a re. "For soul’s (identi ed
                                                                                                   for re) death is the birth of water, for
                                                                                                   water’s death is the birth of earth, from
                                           Heraclitus said, “We can never step in the same river
                                           twice.”                                                 earth water is born , from water is soul”.
                                 fi
                                      fi
                                                     fi
                                                                   fi
                                                                        fi
                                                                        
                                                                             fi
                                                                                  
                                                  Parmenides
                                                  Elea
                                                  515-450 BC
                Heraclitus found change itself to be the                 that the arché is what the Miletians (Thales,
                only thing that was permanent. Now                       Anaximander, Anaximenes) thought it was.
                comes Parmenides — a turning point in the                This also make it unthinkable to speak of
                history of western philosophy - for he                   time because the only way we even
                denies the reality of change. For                        understand what time is has to do with
                Parmenides, change is impossible. The                    how things move and change. So,
                idea of change is incoherent. And it is not              whatever is has always been and and will
                the only surprising conclusion Parmenides                always be never changing, never
                draws; he also holds that there is no                    improving, never deteriorating but always
                coming into existence, or ceasing to exist.              perfect and complete.
                According to Parmenides, everything that
                                                                         But what about everything that I see and
                exists is permanent, ungenerated,
                                                                         that is moving, what is that? All of that is an
                indestructible, and unchanging.
                                                                         illusion; nothing you see or hear is really
                He argued as follows:                                    what is out there. Imagine trying to see
                                                                         something that is not there to be seen. It is
                     Whatever is, is
                                                                         impossible. We cannot see what is not
                     Whatever is, must be                                there to be seen, so why should we be
                     What is not, is not                                 able to refer to what is not there to be
                     What is not ,cannot exist.                          referred to? If something does not exist, in
                                                                         other words, we cannot think about it and
                As a philosopher, Parmenides think only
                                                                         we cannot speak about it.
                about what is, not what is not. What is
                cannot be destroyed nor cannot come into                 The "no-longer" and the "not-yet" are
                existence; because if something comes                    therefore variants of "what-is-not", and so
                into existence, where did it comes from?                 the past and future do not exist either.
                And if is destroyed, where does it go?                   Then, change is impossible.
                Nowhere; this new particle of arché that
                just came into being, it came into being                                                     What is cannot
                from nothing, truly nothing. How can that                                                    move or grow or
                generate something? That is impossible.                                                      shrink and it
                                                                                                             cannot change
                Therefore, what is cannot move or grow
                                                                                                             because what is
                or shrink and it cannot change. All of these                                                 is alway perfect
                things are impossible if you really believe                                                  and complete.
             Focus Question #5: If you agree with Heraclitus’ idea that “everything is constantly
             changing” and “in unity of opposites”, prove it by means of pictures (at least 3 or 4) w/
             caption. Each picture should compliment the other. Go to Google Classroom for further
             instructions.
                                                  Anaxagoras
                                                  Ionia
                                                  500-428 BC
                                                  Explained the scienti c reasons behind natural phenomena such as
                                                  eclipses, rainbows and meteors.
                                                  Believed that there are mountains on the surface of the moon and that
                                                  it was inhabited.
             Like other Pre-Socratic philosophers of his                     (a) There is no becoming and no passing-
             time, Anaxagoras chose to interpret the                         away. In other words, these fundamental
             world through a lens of science,                                substances have always existed. Nothing
             observation, and logic instead of through                       can be created from nothing and likewise,
             traditional Greek mythology. And because                        nothing out of existence. For example,
             of this rejection of traditional Greek                          when people die, they do not truly cease to
             mythology, Anaxagoras was convicted of                          exist. Instead, the fundamental substances
             atheism (not believing in the existence of                      that composed them simply separate.
             gods) and exiled from Athens in the 430s.
                                                                             (b) Everything is in everything. This
             The Pre-Socratic philosophers observed                          principle means that all of these
             that the world is made up of very diverse                       fundamental substances are inseparable.
             objects, and they all attempted to develop                      Therefore, we can never nd one of these
             theories that explained this diversity.                         fundamental substances in its purity; all of
             Anaxagoras theorized that there are                             the other fundamental substances are
             numerous (perhaps in nite) fundamental,                         always present. For example, a dog is made
             physical substances that combine in unique                      up of the exact same fundamental
             ways to construct this diversity we see.                        substances as both a human and a chair. It's
             These fundamental substances act like                           just that the ratio of these fundamental
             ingredients that were combined in certain                       substances differs in each object or being.
             ratios to produce different things (like trees,                 This is an odd concept, so consider this
             furniture, ball, etc.) or beings (like human,                   analogy: smear together red, green, blue,
             animals) on Earth. Anaxagoras insisted on a                     and yellow paint. Once you smear these
             few main principles when it comes to these                      colors together, you can never truly
             fundamental substances:                                         separate them again. The colors literally
                                                                             seem to be in one another.
                      fi
                           fi
                                fl
                                     fi
                                          
                                                     Empedocles
                                                     Italy
                                                     495-435 BC
                                                     Believed that the world is composed of the four primary elements, Earth,
                                                     water, wind and re.
                                                     Claimed that the world came into being and is maintained by the mixing
                                                     of the four primary elements as they come together and are separated by
                                                     the processes of Love and Strife.
                         Empedocles lived 2500 years ago, soon                      was also Empedocles, kept racehorses. His
                         after the dawn of scienti c thought in                     father, Meton, was an Olympic Champion.
                         Ancient Greece. He was born in Acragas,
                         on the island of Sicily, which was then part               He was a vegetarian because he believed
                         of Ancient Greece. Acragas was a                           human souls could inhabit animals’ bodies,
                         magni cent city, culturally and nancially                  so it would be murderous and even
                         rich. Empedocles’ family was well-known                    cannibalistic to kill and eat any animal. This
                         and wealthy. His grandfather, whose name                   was a typical Pythagorean belief.
          fi
          fi
               fi
                    
                           fi
                                  
                                       fi
                                                fi
                                                     
                                                     fi
                                                              
         fl
          fi
               
                              fi
                                   fi
                                        
                                            fl
                                                      
                                                      fi
                                                             
                      Because of the excellent education they                         Plato, and Aristotle were different from
                      received and the freedom they had to                            each other in some of their ideas, they did
                      develop and share their own ideas, the                          have some important things in common.
                      Athenians produced some of the greatest                         First, all three of them knew that virtue is
                      thinkers in all of human history. Among                         very important. They recognized that
                      these thinkers are three men, Socrates,                         without virtue a person can never be
                      Plato, and Aristotle, whose ideas have                          completely happy and ful lled. All three of
                      in uenced nearly everyone since then. All                       them were also very curious about people
                      three of these men were                                         and about the world around them. The
                      philosophers. They use reason to search for                     ideas of these three men continue to
                      the truth about important things like human                     in uence us in many ways even today.
                      life, God, and nature. Although Socrates,
                                                           Socrates
                                                           Athens
                                                           470-399 BC
                                                           Well known for wandering around the agora and marketplace of Athens
                                                           and ask people about what they believe.
                                                           Remembered more for how he taught than for what he taught (Socratic
                                                           Method).
                      Socrates was born and lived nearly his                          contribution to philosophy is the Socratic
                      entire life in Athens. His father                               Method. The method is de ned as a form
                      Sophroniscus was a stonemason and his                           of inquiry and discussion between
                      mother, Phaenarete, was a midwife. His                          individuals, based on asking and answering
                      family apparently had the moderate wealth                       questions to illuminate ideas. This method
                      required to launch Socrates’ career as a                        is performed by asking question after
                      hoplite (foot soldier). Socrates married                        question with the purpose of seeking to
                      Xanthippe, a younger woman, who bore                            expose contradictions in one’s thoughts,
                      him three sons: Lamprocles, Sophroniscus                        guiding him/her to arrive at a solid,
                      and Menexenus. He had little to do with his                     defensible conclusion. The principle
                      sons' upbringing and expressed far more                         underlying the Socratic Method is that
                      interest in the intellectual development of                     humans learn through the use of reasoning
                      Athens' other young boys.                                       and logic; ultimately nding holes in their
                                                                                      own theories and then patching them up. In
                      Socrates is often credited as one of the                        the Socratic Method (or reasoning
                      founders of Western philosophy. His largest                     method), Socrates asked questions to his
                               fi
                                         fi
                                              
                                                  fi
                                                       
                   Focus Question #6: Have you experienced the Socratic Method of learning in your previous
                   years in school? Tell me something about it in 5 sentences only. Send it to me thru text/
                   private messaging or via e-mail. Do not forget to include your name, section and class
                   schedule
              fi
                          
                                                   fi
                      GEC08-SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY                                                        HISTORY OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
                                                   Plato
                                                   Athens
                                                   428-348 BC
                                                   Founded the rst university in the western civilization called The
                                                   Academy where he taught about Socrates and Socrates ideas.
                                                   Famous in his Theory of Forms where it asserts that the physical world is
                                                   not really the 'real' world; instead, ultimate reality exists beyond our
                                                   physical world. 
                      Plato’s parents came from the Greek                            observation. The world that we perceive
                      aristocracy. His father, Ariston, descended                    through the mind, seems to be permanent
                      from the kings of Athens and Messenia. His                     and unchanging. Which world perceived is
                      mother, Perictione, is said to be related to                   more real? Why are we seen two different
                      the 6th century B.C.E. Greek statesman                         worlds? To nd a solution to these
                      Solon. He did have a number of siblings,                       problems, Plato split the world into two;
                      however: three brothers, Glaucon,                                  (1) the physical realm, and
                      Antiphon, and Adeimantus of Collytus, and
                                                                                         (2) the transcendent or spiritual realm
                      one sister, Potone. His father died when he
                      was young, and his mother remarried with
                      her uncle Pyrilampes. Plato did not have                       The physical realm is the material stuff we
                      children, and it is assumed based on                           see and interact with on a daily basis; this
                      textual evidence that he never married.                        realm is changing and imperfect. It is the
                                                                                     material world, perceived through the
                                                                                     senses, that is imitation of the forms. The
                      Plato founded The Academy, an academic
                                                                                     spiritual realm, however, exists beyond the
                      program that many consider to be the rst
                                                                                     physical realm. Plato calls this spiritual
                      Western university, Plato was a student of
                                                                                     realm the Realm of Forms (also called the
                      Socrates and teacher of Aristotle. He’s
                                                                                     Realm of Ideas or Realm of Ideals). This
                      known for being the founder of the
                                                                                     particular world is invulnerable to the pains
                      Academy in Athens, the rst institution of
                                                                                     and changes of the material world; it is
                      higher learning in the Western world,
                                                                                     perfect and unchanging.
                      where he stressed the importance of
                      science and mathematics. Because of this,
                      he became known as the “maker of                               Let's consider a speci c example. Think of a
                      mathematicians.”                                               square. Now draw a picture of a square on
                                                                                     a piece of paper. I will also draw a picture
                                                                                     of a square on a piece of paper. Our
                      Plato’s contributions to philosophy is the
                                                                                     pictures are likely a bit imperfect; maybe
                      Theory of Forms (Ideas). This theory states
                                                                                     our lines aren't exactly straight, or our
                      that the physical world is not really the 'real'
                                                                                     angles aren't exactly 90 degrees. In
                      world; instead, ultimate reality exists
                                                                                     addition, your picture and my picture are
                      beyond our physical world. The world we
                                                                                     likely a little different in sizes, colors, etc. To
                      perceive through our senses seems to be
                                                                                     put it in Plato's terms, our pictures of
                      always changing, which is obviously a clear
        fi
             
                 fi
                          
                                 fi
                                      fi
                                           
                                                            fi
                                                                 
             squares reside in the physical realm.                      According to Plato, The Forms are the
             Despite their imperfections and differences                essences of various objects; these are the
             there's something about our pictures that                  qualities that an object must have to be
             unites them. So what exactly is it that                    considered that type of object. For
             makes both of our pictures squares? The                    example, there are countless chairs in the
             “it” that makes our pictures squares is the                world but the form of “chairness” (the
             Form of Square. You and I share a similar                  qualities that make a chair what is or the
             concept or ideal of what 'square' is, even                 essence of what it means to be a chair) is at
             though our pictures of squares turned out                  the core of all chairs.
             slightly different. To put it in Plato's terms,
             the concept and ideal of Square resides in                 Plato's Theory of Forms asserts that the
             the Realm of Forms and is, therefore,                      physical realm is only a shadow, or image,
             perfect, abstract, and unchanging. Plato                   of the true reality of the Realm of Forms. He
             would say that this Form of Square is more                 held that the world of Forms is
             real than our physical drawings of a square.               transcendent to our own world, the world
                                                                        of substances, which is the essential basis
             So what are these Forms, according to                      of reality. Because the Forms exist
             Plato? The Forms are abstract, perfect,                    independently of time and space, they can
             unchanging concepts or ideals that go                      be said to exist only as ideas in people's
             beyond time and space; they exist in the                   minds. The Forms are objective "blueprints"
             Realm of Forms. Even though the Forms are                  for perfection. They are considered perfect
             abstract, that doesn't mean they are not                   themselves because they are unchanging. 
             real. In fact, the Forms are more “real” than
             any individual physical objects. So,
             concepts like Redness, Roundness, Beauty,
             Justice, or Goodness are Forms (and thus
             they are commonly capitalized). Individual
             objects like a red book, a round ball, a
             beautiful girl, a just action, or a good
             person reside in the physical realm and are                 The physical world we perceive through senses seems to
             simply different examples of the Forms.                     be always changing, while the spiritual world that we
                                                                         perceive through the mind, seems to be permanent and
                                                                         unchanging.
                                        Aristotle
                                        Athens
                                        384-322 BC
                                        Believed that the one thing that all people want is happiness.
                                        Believed that the two fundamental kinds of motion are natural motion
                                        and violent motion. The apparent movement of celestial objects is a
                                        natural motion, whereas lifting an object is a violent motion.
             fi
                  fi
                   fi
                        fi
                                  fi
                                       fl
                                            
                                                        fi
                                                            
                                                                fi
                                                                     
                    However, any motion that requires a force                    Furthermore, Aristotle theorized the
                    is a violent motion. Examples of violent                     following about motion based on his
                    motion include;                                              observation but not on experiment;
                          • Pushing a book along a table.                           • heavy objects fall faster than lighter
                                                                                      ones.
                          • Lifting a book.
                                                                                    • objects in the heavens (the celestial
                    Basically, Aristotle's view of motion is that
                                                                                      sphere) move in circular motion,
                    "it requires a force to make an object move
                                                                                      without any external force compelling
                    in an unnatural" manner. Anyway, if you
                                                                                      them to do so.
                    push a book, it moves and when you stop
                    pushing it, the book stops from moving                          • objects on Earth (the terrestrial
                    (but of course, it will not stop at the instant,                  sphere) move in straight lines,
                    it will slows down at rst before coming to a                      unless forced to move in a circular
                    stop).                                                            motion.
                    After all, if you push a book, it moves.                     Aristotle’s theory of motion was accepted
                    When you stop pushing, the book stops                        for about 2,000 years until Galileo Galilei
                    moving. (Not right away, of course, but,                     contradicted his ideas. Galileo did not
                    unless you push it, it gradually slows to a                  believed that an object , such as ball, came
                    stop.) To keep a bicycle moving (on level                    to a rest because it desired to be in its
                    ground) you have to keep pedaling. To                        natural state of motion. And if that is the
                    keep a car moving, you have to keep the                      case, the ball might roll on forever. Galileo
                    engine pushing it.                                           explained that an object only stops from
                                                                                 moving because an external force such
                    To most people, this is a very reasonable                    friction causes it to stop. He also imposed
                    and "common sense" notion. There are                         the theory of inertia, which states that the
                    only two problems with this idea : (1) It                    inertia of an object will maintain its state of
                    doesn't work, and (2) It isn't logical.                      motion; eventually, the greater is the inertia
                                                                                 of an object, the greater is its tendency to
                                                                                 change its state of motion. In other words, a
                                                                                 basketball will come to a stop rst before a
                                                                                 tennis ball
                                                                                 (when they
                                                                                 started
                                                                                 rolling from
                                                                                 the same
                                                                                 point)
                                                                                 because
                                                                                                    Basketball has greater inertia than
                                                                                 basketball
                                                                                                    tennis ball.
                                                                                 has greater
                        Galileo Galilei rejected Aristotle’s theory of motion;   inertia than
                        Galileo used the inertia of an object to explain why     the tennis ball. Actually inertia is
                        an object stop moving.                                   proportional to the mass of an object.
                              fi
                                          
                                              
                                                  fi
                                                       
                                                           
                       During the 5th century BC, ancient Greek                            bodies. It also provided information about
                       technology developed, leading to the                                the location of the sun, planets and some
                       invention of the rotary mills, screw, water                         of the stars. It was used in the past by
                       pump, gear, water organ, water clock, the                           astronomers, astrologers, and navigators,
                       torsion catapult and the use of steam to                            mainly for;
                       operate machines and toys. The
                                                                                               • locating and predicting the positions
                       foundation, for the use of water resources,
                                                                                                 of the Sun, Moon, planets, and stars,
                       in the modern world, was laid by the Greek
                       civilization. Many of these inventions                                  • determining local time given local
                       occurred late in the Greek period, often                                  latitude and vice versa, and
                       inspired by the need to improve weapons,
                       tactics in war and for everyday life. Their                             • for triangulation, and surveying.
                       technology reveals a lot about
                                                                                           Astrolabe was actually an analog calculator,
                       contemporary society. For the Greeks,
                                                                                           that measures the altitude of stars and
                       science and technology were not intended
                                                                                           planets above the horizon, capable of
                       for mass-production and marketing. Apart
                                                                                           working out several different kinds of
                       from a few exceptions scienti c research
                                                                                           problems in spherical astronomy.
                       was rarely intended for practical
                       applications, and never for selling them.
                       Nobody would have thought to claim                                  Astrolabes have been traced to the 6th
                       intellectual property rights on his                                 century, and they appear to have come into
                       inventions or to produce them in factories.                         wide use from the early Middle Ages in
                       Anyway the notion of factory did not even                           Europe and the Islamic world. By about the
                       exist and at the time, a workshop having                            mid-15th century, astrolabes were adopted
                       about forty workers was already a big                               by mariners      and used in celestial
                                                                                                   III. Technology          y in everyday life
                       business. Greeks did not take repetitive                            navigation. By far, this has been one of the
                       manufacturing in high esteem, and did they                          valuable 3.1contributions
                                                                                                           Lifting          mademachinery
                                                                                                            ifting and building      by Greece in
                       really need machines, since slaves and                              the The
                                                                                                 eld   of astronomy.
                                                                                                    Greeks had a large range of advanced technologies to build their monuments. The
                                                                                              kinds of cranes, pulleys, winches and capstan hoists, block and tackle systems which
                       metics were easily available. Some of their                            stones with minimal effort, lifting tongs and lewis for a safe and easy handling.
                                                                                                                                                                      handling Archimed
                                                                                              winch using a gearbox with which he moved the heaviest loads using only one hand. hand Th
                       inventions are enumerated below;                                    Overhead        Crane
                                                                                              built piers (below) was(515      BC)clever.
                                                                                                                      particularly
                                                                                                                               The Greeks had water mills but used also special type wi
                                                                                                                               turbine, well suited for fast flows of small rivers. They
                      For SLSU use only                                                                                        operate the bellows ofPage  42 of 46 (an organ equipped
                                                                                                                                                      the "hydraulis"            quipped w
                                                                                                                               and pipes like today), but much more, they developed a
                                                                                                                               pumping systems for domestic needs or irrigation.
                                                  fi
                                                       
                   objects off the ground.,This crane was         wearing, however, it was not strong enough
                   mounted on a mobile platform. Capstan          to breach forti cations.
                   winches allowed to tilt it forward or
                   backward and to lift the load. The stone       Water Mill (3rd Century BC)
                   was grabbed on one side, lifted, tilted to
                   the other side, and dropped off. For
                   building a pier, the crane was moved
                   forward before handling the next one. Two
                   cranes could be used together to build
                   parallel walls, then the space between both
                   was lled in.
             fi
                        
              gear would move to represent the calendar                 earliest paper maps that were used for
              year, and would, in turn, move many                       navigation, and to depict certain areas of
              separate smaller gears to represent the                   the Earth. Anaximander was the rst of the
              motions of the planets, sun, and moon.                    ancient Greeks to draw a map of the known
                                                                        world, and, as such, he is considered to be
              Cartography (600 BC)                                      one of the rst cartographers. The ancient
                                                                        Greek maps are important to the history of
                                                        Cartography     cartography because they often showed
                                                           is the       Greece as being at the center of the world
                                                            study and   and surrounded by an ocean. Other early
                                                         practice of    Greek maps show the world as divided into
                                                         making         two continents—Asia and Europe. These
                                                        maps. Ancient   ideas came largely out of Homer’s works as
                                                   Greeks created the   well as other early Greek literature.
              Focus Question #7: Search for the other inventions of the ancient Greeks and choose one
              from these inventions; then look for the counterpart of such invention in the modern days.
              Find a picture of both the ancient invention and the innovation of such invention in the
              modern days; briefly describe each. Go to your Google Classroom and submit your work, in
              PDF, by first clicking the question posted in your classwork.
    fi
         
                  fl
                          
                                        fi
                                             
     Self Assessment #2: The result of this test will reveal how much you understand the
     lesson and will be recorded as part of your performance. Go to your Google
     Classroom; click the link to redirect you in the Google Form to answer this test. Say
     aloud your promise of honesty (below) before taking the quiz.
     In taking this quiz, I (your name) understand that I may not work with anyone else,
     including conferring with others (student, or anyone else); exchanging information,
     answer or ideas; or in aiding or being aided by others in the completion of this test.
     I understand that failure to follow this rules is considered cheating, and may subject
     me to a significant reduction in my grade at the discretion of the professor. I certify
     that I have personally prepared the answers to this test in accordance with the
     above stated rules.
    1. What purpose did ancient Greek philosophy serve? (A) To explain religion. (B) To study
       medicine. (C) To create maps. (D) To explain the world around them.
    2. This philosopher was the teacher of Alexander the Great and the author of the
       Nicomachean Ethics. (A) Plato (B) Socrates (C) Aristotle (D) Phytagoras
    3. What was the Socratic method? (A) A variable and solution technique (B) A question and
       answer technique (C) An experiment and solution technique (D) A test and and question
       technique
    4. Why was Socrates sentenced to death? (A) He tried to overthrow the government. (B) He
       was corrupting the minds of the youth of Athens. (C) He stole silver from the treasury.
       (D) He protested democracy.
    5. Which Greek philosopher theorized that solar eclipses were caused by the passage of the
       moon between the sun and the earth (which was correct)? (A) Anaxagoras (B) Plato
       (C) Empedocles (D) Anaximenes
    6. What is the correct order of teachers? (A) Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Alexander the Great
       (B) Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Alexander the Great (C) Plato, Aristotle, Socrates, Alexander
       the Great (D) Aristotle, Alexander the Great, Plato, Socrates
    7. This philosopher is recognized for breaking from the use of mythology to explain the
       world and the universe, and instead explaining natural objects and phenomena by
       theories and hypotheses. (A) Thales of Miletus (B) Anaximenes (C) Anaximander
       (D) Empedocles
    8. Which of these is true of the Presocratics? (A) They used the gods of Olympus to explain
       earthquakes. (B) They believed Zeus governed over all. (C) They sought rational reasons
       for natural phenomena. (D) They relied on ancient myth to handle everyday problems.
     10. The clock-like mechanism invented by ancient Greeks, called Antikythera Mechanism, had
         several dials and clock faces, each which served a different functions. This mechanism can
         be used for the following purposes except _____. (A) determining and forecasting
         important astronomical events such as eclipses (B) predicting the position of the planets
         and stars in the sky (C) determining the time of the day. (D) charting the moment of the
         sun, planets and moons
       Choose one (1) of the ancient Greek philosophers (mentioned in this module) and make a
       short (2-min) video about his life, works and achievements. Include voice over and caption
       for a better understanding of the content of the video.
                                    The student did      The student clearly      The student          The student
                                    not show an          understood most          seemed to            clearly
                                    adequate             aspects of the topic     understand the       understood the
      Understanding                 understanding of     and presented his/her    main points of       topic in-depth
      of topic                      the topic.           information with ease.   the topic and        and presented
                                                                                  presented those      his/her
                                                                                  with ease            information
                                                                                                       convincingly.