[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views3 pages

Structural Analysis for Engineers

1) The document describes the method of consistent deformation for analyzing indeterminate structures like trusses. 2) It involves determining the degree of incompatibility, selecting redundant forces, and setting up compatibility equations involving the redundant forces and deformations of members. 3) An example truss is analyzed by first determining it has one redundant force, then setting up and solving the single compatibility equation to find the value of the redundant force.

Uploaded by

balsam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
106 views3 pages

Structural Analysis for Engineers

1) The document describes the method of consistent deformation for analyzing indeterminate structures like trusses. 2) It involves determining the degree of incompatibility, selecting redundant forces, and setting up compatibility equations involving the redundant forces and deformations of members. 3) An example truss is analyzed by first determining it has one redundant force, then setting up and solving the single compatibility equation to find the value of the redundant force.

Uploaded by

balsam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Theory of Structures Indeterminate Structures: Method of Consistent Deformation

Analysis of Indeterminate Trusses


Procedure for Analysis
1. Determine the degree of indeterminacy.
2. The redundant is the support reactions and/or the forces in bars.
No. of Redundant forces = Degree of Indeterminacy
3. Follow similar steps that used for beams and frames but use the following compatibility equations.
if there is two redundant:
∆10 + 𝛿11 𝑥1 + 𝛿12 𝑥2 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
∆20 + 𝛿21 𝑥1 + 𝛿22 𝑥2 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑒𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡
Where:
𝑆𝑢1 𝐿 𝑆𝑢2 𝐿
∆10 = ∑ + ∑ 𝑢1 𝛼𝐿∆𝑡 + ∑ 𝑢1 ∆𝐿𝑓𝑎𝑏. , ∆20 = ∑ + ∑ 𝑢2 𝛼𝐿∆𝑡 + ∑ 𝑢2 ∆𝐿𝑓𝑎𝑏.
𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴
𝑢12 𝐿 𝑢22 𝐿 𝑢1 𝑢2 𝐿
𝛿11 = ∑ , 𝛿22 = ∑ , 𝛿21 = 𝛿12 = ∑
𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴
Example: Analyze the truss shown below by the method of Consistent Deformation. EA is constant.
Solution:
40kN 40kN 1kN

A B 26.7kN A B 4/3kN A B
C C C
6m

6m

6m

D D D

E E E
26.7kN 4/3kN
4m 4m 4m 4m 4m 4m

40kN 1kN
Actual Truss Primary Truss S u1

The truss is indeterminate to the first degree


So, there is one redundant.
It can be solved by removing the reaction at C.
∆10 + 𝛿11 𝑥1 = 0 𝐸𝑞. (1)
Member L S u1 Su1L u12 L
AB 4 0 4/3 0 7.11 𝑆𝐿𝑢1 278.3 𝐿𝑢12 42.0
∆10 = ∑ = , 𝛿11 = ∑ =
BC 4 0 4/3 0 7.11 𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴
AD 5 33.4 0 0 0 Substituting in Eq. (1)
BD 3 -40 0 0 0
278.3 42.0
CD 5 0 -5/3 0 13.89 + 𝑥 = 0, 𝑥1 = −6.63
𝐸𝐴 𝐸𝐴 1
AE 6 -20 0 0 0
ED 5 -33.4 -5/3 278.3 13.89 ↑
 278.3 42.0
Dr. Nibras Nizar, Dr.Hanadi Fadhel 8
Theory of Structures Indeterminate Structures: Method of Consistent Deformation

The remaining reactions can be found by applying the equilibrium equations


Fy=0  Ey= 33.37 𝑘𝑁 ↑

MA=0 6.63 ∗ 8 − 40 ∗ 4 + 𝐸𝑥 ∗ 6 = 0
Ex=17.83𝑘𝑁 ←

Fx=0  Ax=17.83𝑘𝑁 →

Example: Analyze the truss shown below. =12x10-6, EA=1x105kN. C D E

Members AB, BE increase in Temp. by 40oC.


Member BC is 1.0 cm too short.
Support E settles vertically 1.0cm.

4m
Solution:
The Truss is indeterminate to the second degree A
B
3m 3m
So, there is two redundant.
80kN
The vertical reaction at E (Ey) and force in bar CB are selected as the redundant. Actual Truss

C D E 60kN C D E 1.5kN C D E 0

N
1k
1kN
4m

4m

4m

N
1k
60kN A 1.5kN A 0 A
B B B
3m 3m 3m 3m 3m 3m

80kN
80kN 1kN 0
Primary Truss S u1 u2

Bar L S u1 u2 Su1L Su2L u12 L u12 L u1u2 L F=S+u1x1+u2x2


AB 3 0 -3/4 -3/5 0 0 1.69 1.08 1.35 -127.92
CD 3 0 0 -3/5 0 0 0 1.08 0 -81.42
DE 3 -60 -3/4 0 135 0 1.69 0 0 -106.5
AC 4 0 0 -4/5 0 0 0 2.56 0 -108.56
BD 4 +80 +1 -4/5 320 -256 4 2.56 -3.2 33.44
AD 5 -100 -5/4 +1 625 -500 7.81 5 -6.25 -41.8
BC 5 0 0 +1 0 0 0 5 0 135.7
EB 5 0 -5/4 0 0 0 7.81 0 0 -77.5
After computing
 1080 -756 23 17.28 -8.1 x1 &x2 values
∆10 + 𝛿11 𝑥1 + 𝛿12 𝑥2 = 0.01 (1)
∆20 + 𝛿21 𝑥1 + 𝛿22 𝑥2 = 0 (2)
𝑆𝑢1 𝐿
∆10 = ∑ + ∑ 𝑢1 𝐿𝛼∆𝑡 + ∑ 𝑢1 ∆𝐿𝑓𝑎𝑏.
𝐸𝐴

1080 3 5
= + (− ∗ 3 ± ∗ 5) ∗ 12 ∗ 10−6 ∗ 40 + 0 = 0.00672𝑚
1 ∗ 105 4 4
Dr. Nibras Nizar, Dr.Hanadi Fadhel 9
Theory of Structures Indeterminate Structures: Method of Consistent Deformation

𝑆𝑢2 𝐿
∆20 = ∑ + ∑ 𝑢2 𝐿𝛼∆𝑡 + ∑ 𝑢2 ∆𝐿𝑓𝑎𝑏.
𝐸𝐴

−756 3
= 5
+ (− ∗ 3 + 0) ∗ 12 ∗ 10−6 ∗ 40 + 1 ∗ −0.01 = −0.01842𝑚
1 ∗ 10 5

𝑢12 𝐿 23 𝑢22 𝐿 17.28 𝑢1 𝑢2 𝐿 −8.1


𝛿11 =∑ = 𝛿22 =∑ = 𝛿21 = 𝛿12 = ∑ =
𝐸𝐴 1 ∗ 105 𝐸𝐴 1 ∗ 105 𝐸𝐴 1 ∗ 105

Substituting in Eq’s. (1) and (2)


23 8.1
0.00672 + 𝑥 −
5 1
𝑥2 = 0.01 → −328 + 23𝑥1 − 8.1𝑥2 = 0 (1)
10 105
8.1 17.28
−0.01842 − 5
𝑥1 + 𝑥2 = 0 → −1842 − 8.1𝑥1 + 17.28𝑥2 = 0 (2)
10 105
By solving Eq’s. (1) & (2) :
𝑥1 = 62 𝑘𝑁, 𝑥2 = 135.7𝑘𝑁
𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑏𝑎𝑟 = 𝐹 = 𝑆 + 𝑢1 𝑥1 + 𝑢2 𝑥2

Dr. Nibras Nizar, Dr.Hanadi Fadhel 10

You might also like