Reviewer in Ethics
Reviewer in Ethics
Reviewer in Ethics
WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY?
ETYMOLOGY OF PHILOSOPHY
•Derived from the Greek words “Phylos” meaning “to love” and “Sophia” meaning “Wisdom”.
PHILOSOPHY
•It enquires into the nature of matter, time, space, causality, evolution, life, and mind, and their
relation to one another. It is the art of thinking all things logically, systematically, and
persistently. It is the art of thinking rationally and systematically of the reality as a whole.
• Plato rightly conceived of philosophy as the persistent attempt to seek clear notions.
•It examines, clarifies, and explains popular and scientific concepts of matter, space, time,
causality, evolution, mechanism, teleology, life, mind or soul, God or the Absolute, right and
wrong, good and evil, beauty and ugliness, arid the like, and arrives at a rational conception of
the reality. Clarification of concepts is the task of philosophy.
It is the critical analysis of the popular and scientific concepts, and the discovery of their
relations to one another. It is a rational attempt to integrate our knowledge and interpret
and unify our experiences.
Philosophy is the rational attempt to have a world-view. It endeavors to reach a
conception of the entire universe with all its elements and aspects and their interrelations
to one another. It is not contented with a partial view of the world. It seeks to have a
synoptic view of the whole reality it tries to have a vision, of the whole. The different
sciences deal with different departments of the world.
Philosophy is regarded now more as an interpretation of human life, its source, value,
meaning, and destiny, than as an enquiry into the nature of the world, soul, and God. It
tries to understand the universe in relation to man.
METAPHYSICS
Is everything real? How can I know that something is real?
Am I knowledgeable? Do I know everything? How do I know what I know? Am I doing
things right? How can I be sure that I’m not doing the wrong things? What is beauty? Is
beauty subjective?
Metaphysics – is concerned with explaining the fundamental nature of being and the world.
Metaphysics philosophers wrestle with such questions as:
Is there a God?
What is Truth?
Do people have free wills?
What is person? What makes person the same through time?
EPISTEMOLOGY
Am I knowledgeable?
Do I know everything? How do I know what I know?
Am I doing things right?
How can I be sure that I’m not doing the wrong things?
What is beauty? Is beauty subjective?
Epistemology – The branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope (including
limitations) of knowledge. It addresses four main questions.
Typical questions of concern in epistemology are:
What is knowledge?
Do we know anything at all?
How do we know what we know?
Can we be justified in claiming to know?
Am I doing things right? How can I be sure that I’m not doing the wrong things?
What is beauty? Is beauty subjective?
VALUE THEORY
Refers to a situation in which a tough choice has to be made between two or more
options, especially more or less equally undesirable ones. Not all dilemmas are moral
dilemmas.
Also called ‘ethical dilemmas,’ moral dilemmas are situations in which a difficult choice
has to be made between two courses of action, either of which entails transgressing a
moral principle. At the very least, a moral dilemma involves conflicts between moral
requirements.
Key features of a moral dilemma
A. The agent is required to do each of two (or more) actions;
B. The agent can do each of the actions, but the agent cannot do both (or all) of the
actions.
Three levels of moral Dilemmas
Personal dilemmas- are those experienced and resolved on a personal level. Since may
ethical decisions are personally made, many, if not most of, moral dilemmas fall under, or boil
down to, this level.
Organizational dilemmas- refer to ethical cases encountered and resolved by social
organizations. This category includes moral dilemmas in business, the medical field, and the
public sector.
Structural dilemmas- refer to cases involving a network of institutions and operative theoretical
paradigms.
Only human beings can be ethical
A. Only human beings are rational, autonomous, ad self-conscious.
B. Only human beings can act morally or immorally.
C. Only human beings are part of the moral community.
A culture is a way of life of a group of people, and this so- called way of life includes
moral values and behaviours, along with knowledge, beliefs, symbols that accept.
Many aspects of morality are taught. People learn morals and aspects of right or wrong
from transmitters of culture; respective parents, teachers, novels, films, and television.
Anthropologically speaking, culture – including moral values, beliefs, and behaviour – is
learned from other people while growing up in a particular society or group.
Social learning is the process by which individuals acquire knowledge from others in the
groups to which they belong, as a normal part of childhood.
“Moral Standards as Social Convention” and the Social Conditioning Theory
Among the popular notions which attempt to give account for the basic Concepts in Ethics, such
as the existence of moral rules, the sense of moral obligation, and moral accountability, are so-
called social conventions and social conditioning theories.
•A convention is a set of agreed, stipulated, or generally accepted standards, norms, social
norms, or criteria, often taking the form of a custom. In a social context, a convention may retain
the character of an "unwritten law" of custom.
•SOCIAL CONVENTIONS are those arbitrary rules and norms governing the countless
behaviors all of us engage in every day without necessarily thinking about them, from shaking
hands when greeting someone to driving on the right side of the road.
Concerning social conditioning theory it can be observed that when one says that a particular
action “ought or not ought” to be done, he/she is not simply echoing social approval or
disapproval.
Cultural Relativism in Ethics
• Cultural relativism is perhaps the most famous form of moral relativism, a theory in ethics
which holds that ethical judgment.
• Moral relativism fundamentally believes that no act is good or bad objectively, and there is no
single objective universal standard through which we can evaluate the truth of moral judgment.
• Moral relativism submits that different moral principles apply to different persons or groups of
individuals.
• The relativist theory is very much compatible with moral subjectivism. If the considered basis is
a given society, the relativist ideology is typically referred to as cultural relativism.
Cultural relativism, the most dominant form of moral relativism, defines “moral” as what
is socially approved by the majority in a particular culture. It maintains that an act is
ethical in a culture that approved of it, but immoral in one that disapproves of it.
• Valuable lessons from ethical relativism – The theory makes us understand that our feelings
and beliefs do not necessarily reflect the truth – they may be mere products of cultural
conditioning.
• The theory’s ethical faults – the theory “moral” simply means socially approved. Cultural
relativism discourages analytical thinking and independent decision-making in Ethics. Logically,
cultural relativism is inconsistent in promoting tolerance while teaching that no culture is morally
superior or more progressive than others.
Asian Moral Understanding
Because culture has a major impact on morality, people from different culture appears to have
seemingly, but not essentially, different sets of Ethics.
This table summarizes what are perceived as differences between Western and Eastern Ethics.
As indicated in the table, the basis Of Asian or Eastern Ethics is religion, specifically Eastern
religions or philosophers Confucianism, for instance, focuses on the cultivation of the virtue of
maintenance of morality, the most basic of which are ren (an obligation of altruism and
humaneness for another individual), Yi (the upholding of righteousness and the moral
disposition to do good), and li (a system of norms and propriety that determines how a person
should properly act in everyday life).
Filipino Moral Character: Strengths and Weaknesses
Filipino cultural morality, especially that which concerns social ethics, centers on ideally having
a “smooth interpersonal relationship” SIR with others. The definition of smooth interpersonal
relationships in the Philippines is principally supported by anchored on at least six basic Filipino
values.
1. Pakikisama
2. Hiya
4. Utang na Loob
3. Amor Propio 6. Respect to Elders
5. Filipino Hospitality
Universal Values
By universal values, we mean those values generally shared by culture. The existence of the
so-called universal values is strong proof that cultural relativism is wrong. If certain values exist
both in Western and Eastern cultures (including Filipino culture) despite the distance, then
cultural relativism’s claim that cultural moralities radically differ from each other is mistaken.