[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
129 views21 pages

Chapter 5 Screening

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 21

CHAPTER 5

Screening
Definition of
Screening

Screening devices are classified


based on the size of the material
they remove (the screenings).
The ‘size’ of screening material
refers to its diameter.
Types of Screens
1. Most large facilities use mechanically-cleaned
screening systems to remove larger materials
because they reduce labour costs and they
improve flow conditions and screening capture.
The savings in labour costs soon make up
for the additional cost of a mechanical
screen.

Selection 2. Typically, only older or smaller treatment facilities


use a manually cleaned screen as the primary or
only screening device.

of Screen 3. A screening compactor is usually situated close

Type to the mechanically cleaned screen and usually


bagged and conveyed to a dumpster or disposal
area.

4. Plants utilizing mechanically cleaned screens


should have a standby hand-raked screen to put
in operation when the primary screening device
is out of service.
This is standard design practice for most
newly designed plants.
of Screens

• The quantity of screenings depends on the length and slope of


the collection system and the presence of pumping stations.

• When the collection system is long and steep or when pumping


stations exist, fewer screenings are produced because of
disintegration of solids.

• Other factors that affect screening quantities are related to flow,


as quantities generally increase greatly during storm flows.
Design Parameters of Primary Screens
Design Parameters for Secondary Screens
Typical Drawing of Screen Chamber based on depth
(< 5 m for different PE)
Typical Drawing of Screen Chamber based on Depth
(> 5 m for different PE)
Example: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack

Assuming suitable criteria, design a screen chamber to treat a


maximum flow of 0.15 m3/s of domestic wastewater in each channel
from the approach channel. Given the width = 0.6 m and depth = 0.4
m. It is also assumed that the screening production is 0.0015 m3/ML of
flow.

(a) Compute flow through (approaching) velocity


(b) Compute the number of bars
(c) Compute flow through velocity through the screen bars
(d) Compute the head loss through the bar rack
(e) Compute the quantity of screening
(f) Design of perforated plate
(g) Compute the inclined length of bars
(h) Compute the length of the screen chamber
Available data:
Example 2: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack Qmax = 0.15 m3 /s
B = 0.6 m
B
D = 0.4 m
Ax
Solution (Con’t): D

(a) Compute approach velocity, va


Qmax 0.15 m3 / s 0.15 m3 / s
The approach velocity, v a = = = = 0.625 m/s
Ax (B  D ) ( 0.6 m  0.4 m )
(b) Compute the number of bars, n
Provide bars of 10 mm wide with a clear opening of 25 mm. Let n be the
number of bars, then
opening (n + 1) + size of bars (n ) = B (total width)
0.025(n + 1) + 0.01 n = 0.6 m
n = 16.43  16 bars
Check :
The total width of the screen chamber, B = 0.6 m
If n =16 bars: 0.025(16+1)+0.01(16) = 0.59 m (accepted)
If n =17 bars: 0.025(17+1)+0.01(17) = 0.62 m (exceeded the total width)

 Hence, the provided 16 bars for the chamber width of 0.6 m is acceptable.
Available data:
Example 2: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack
B = 0.6 m
D = 0.4 m
Dimensions of the screen chamber
Bar width = 0.01 m
Clear bar spacing = 0.025 m
Free board = 0.3 m

FRONT VIEW
Example 2: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack
Available data:
Qmax = 15 m3 /s
B = 0.6 m
Solution: D = 0.4 m
n = 16
(c) Compute flow velocity through the screen bars, vb

The effective width of channel, Be


Be = total width - width of 16 bars
or Be = 0.6 − (0.01 x n )
Be = 0.6 − (0.01 x 16 ) = 0.44 m
and sidewater depth, D = 0.4 m

Therefore, the effective cross-sectional area of the screen is A x effective = Be  D

Then, the velocity of flow through screen bars, v b is given by


Qmax 0.15 m3 / s 0.15 m3 / s 0.15 m3 / s
vb = = = = = 0.85 m/s
A x effective ( e ) (
B x D 0.44 m x 0.4 m ) 0.176 m 2
Available data:
Example 2: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack Qmax = 0.15m3 /s
v b = 0.85 m/s
Solution: v a = 0.625 m/s
Screening production = 0.0015 m3 / ML
(d) Compute head loss through the rack
(v b 2 − v a 2 ) 1
hL = .
2g 0.7
where
v b = velocity through the bar screen = 0.85 m/s
v a = velocity apprach = 0.625 m/s
g = 9.81 m/s2

hL = ( 0.85 )2 − ( 0.625 )2  . 1 = 0.016 m  0.02 m


  0.7

(e) Compute the quantity of screening

Assum ed (in the question) the screening production of 0.0015 m3 / ML of flow.


m3  m3 86400s 1000 L 
Quantity of screening produced = 0.0015   0.15   
ML  s 1d 1 m3 
m3 ML
= 0.0015  12.96
ML d
= 0.019 m3 / d = 19 L/d
Example 2: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack
Solution:

(f) Design of perforated plate


Pr ovided the length of the plate = width of the chamber = 0.6 m, width of the plate
is half of its length, and the depth of the pocket equal to 0.15 m for collecting screenings,
the capacity of the screening pocket, Cs
Cs = L  B  D = 0.6 m  0.3 m  0.15 m = 0.027 m3

Cleaning needs to be done manually everyday for an approximate quantity of screenings of 0.019 m3/d.
Inclined bar screen
(g) Compute the inclined length of the bars

D 0.7 m
Inclined length of bars, 
= 
=1m
sin 45 sin 45

D = 0.7 m
So, provide bars of total length of 1 m.
(h) Compute the length of the screen chamber 45

Horizontal projected length of bar screen is 1 cos 45 = 0.7 m


Let, the length of the inlet zone = Length of the perforated plate + 0.2 m = 0.6 m + 0.2 m = 0.8 m,
while the length of outlet zone = Width of perforated plate + 0.2 m = 0.3 m + 0.2 m = 0.5 m.
 The total length of the screen channel = 0.8 m + 0.7 m + 0.5 m = 2.0 m
Example 2: Design of screen chamber – Bar rack

Details of bar screen

W=
PLAN VIEW

SIDE VIEW

2m

INLET ZONE OUTLET ZONE


1. Manually cleaned screens require frequent raking to prevent clogging.

2. Cleaning frequency depends on the characteristics of the wastewater entering a plant.

3. Some plants have incorporated screening devices, such as basket-type trash racks, that are
manually hoisted and cleaned.

4. Mechanically cleaned screens usually require less labour or operation than manually cleaned
screens because screenings are raked with a mechanical device rather than by facility
personnel.

5. However, the rake teeth on mechanically cleaned screens must be routinely inspected
because of their susceptibility to breakage and bending.

6. Drive mechanisms must also be frequently inspected to prevent fouling due to grit and rags.

7. Grit removed from screens must be disposed of regularly.


End of Chapter 5

You might also like