ESFTMA Published
ESFTMA Published
ESFTMA Published
net/publication/344026547
CITATIONS READS
0 128
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Drew Lazar on 01 September 2020.
Abstract
It has long been recognized that using multiple approaches to solve problems is essential for
students to obtain understanding of mathematical concepts. In view of this, we consider an in-
teresting plane geometry problem with a straightforward formulation, known as the one-seventh
area triangle problem. We present solutions using GeoGebra constructions and manipulation, co-
ordinate geometry, Euclidean geometry and linear algebra. This allows the application of many
of the mathematical tools acquired at the secondary level and makes important and crucial con-
nections between them. The linear algebra section can be used as an introduction to the subject.
This section can also reinforce the close relationship between linear algebra and geometry which
might not receive enough emphasis at the undergraduate level. GeoGebra diagrams, construc-
tions and computer algebra are used throughout the paper. All explanations are done through
questions and answers which allows instructors to easily format the sections into inquiry-based
lessons.
1 I NTRODUCTION
In this paper we consider the one-seventh area triangle problem as in (Wikipedia, 2019). In this prob-
lem, as in Figure 1 below, we construct an inner triangle 4EDF by connecting each vertex of the
triangle 4BAC with a trisection point on the opposite side. The ratio of the area of the inner triangle
to the area of the outer triangle is then always one-seventh. The one-seventh area triangle problem is a
simple, yet rich, plane geometry problem which has many generalizations and admits many methods
of proof (Clarke, 2007; Cook & Wood, 2004; de Villiers, 2005a,b; Man, 2009). We present, solve
and explore the problem through GeoGebra constructions in a manner that is accessible to secondary
and tertiary school students in a question and answer format. All GeoGebra constructions used in this
paper are available at https://www.geogebra.org/m/xwvn4fss.
The primary audience for the paper is mathematicians and instructors of undergraduate mathemat-
ics. The approaches taken in the paper are perfect for secondary education majors who are taking an
upper-level geometry course. For instructors, this paper provides a way to make important connec-
tions between the basic mathematical approaches of Euclidean geometry, coordinate geometry and
15
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
linear algebra through the simple yet engaging one-seventh area inner triangle problem. The GeoGe-
bra constructions, and the use of CAS, are completed – as the paper is intended for instructors. Two
worksheets in Appendix A are included to demonstrate how the material can be adapted for use in a
classroom. Further, any of the GeoGebra constructions can readily be modified to support inquiry-
based lessons as demonstrated at the end of Exploration 1 in Section 2.1. Along these lines, at the
end of Exploration 2 in Section 2.2, we provide student tasks in a GeoGebra worksheet which shows
how this question may be presented to students.
The multiple approaches presented in this paper for the one-seventh area triangle problem support rec-
ommendations found in the 2015 CUPM Curriculum Guide to Majors in the Mathematical Sciences
(Zorn et al., 2015):
• Major programs should include activities designed to promote students’ progress in learning
to: use and compare analytical, visual and numerical perspectives in exploring mathematics
(Cognitive Recommendation 1: Students should develop effective thinking and communication
skills, p. 9)
• Mathematical sciences major programs should teach students to use technology effectively,
both as a tool for solving problems and as an aid to exploring mathematical ideas (Cognitive
Recommendation 3: Students should learn to use technological tools, p. 10).
• Students majoring in the mathematical sciences should learn to read, understand, analyze and
produce proofs at increasing depth as they progress through a major (Content Recommendation
2, p. 10).
In Section 3, we present a proof of the problem in the case of an equilateral triangle using coordi-
nate geometry. A parameter is introduced by taking “n-sections” of the sides in the inner triangle
construction. This results in the derivation of an interesting formula for the ratio of the area of the
inner to the outer triangle in terms of this parameter. The discussion and solution in this section come
directly from Warkentin (1992) with additional explanations, an interactive GeoGebra construction,
16
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
and computer algebra. In Section 4, a proof of the one-seventh inner triangle problem, developed by
the authors, is given using Euclidean geometry. In Section 5.1, we develop a proof using the tools
of linear algebra. The proof can be done directly on the construction using vector algebra (Cook &
Wood, 2004), but we first solve the problem on a right triangle and then consider a linear transforma-
tion. This involves a simpler, initial vector computation in the right triangle and then introduces and
brings to bear crucial properties of linear transformations. Lastly, we give some final remarks.
In this section we will use GeoGebra constructions to explore the ratio of the area of a constructed
inner triangle to the area of the outer triangle. We will investigate the problem through a “drag test”,
where we can observe the ratio for many types of triangles, by considering component parts of the
construction and through division and rotation of the construction in GeoGebra. We provide a similar
construction in a parallelogram in Appendix B.
To find trisection points, use the dilate tool from the transform menu.
Question 2.1 Measure area(4EDF ) and area(4BAC). Then compute the ratio
area(4EDF )
.
area(4BAC)
Drag the vertices of the triangle and observe the ratios of the areas of the triangles. Based on this
“drag test” what can you say about this construction? Does the “drag test” prove your conjecture?
In this construction, we use the FractionText command to represent the ratio as a fraction rather
than a rounded decimal. To modify the construction for an inquiry-based approach, the instructor can
open the file in the GeoGebra application, delete the four text boxes and ask students to use the input
bar, the spreadsheet, or a calculator to make the measurement for themselves. Note that the default
setting will show 0.1 for the ratio. In order to see the repeating pattern for 1/7, the student would need
to change the global setting to 10 decimal places.
17
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
(b). What can you say about the area of the corner triangles compared to the area of the outer
triangle 4BAC?
(c). Do your answers to a. and b. agree with your answer to Question 2.1?
See https://www.geogebra.org/m/vnffpxtv for a student activity and https://www.
geogebra.org/m/mnruvmq8 for the completed construction. Based on the drag test, and in-
specting the area measures, the areas of the quadrilaterals are all the same. The ratio of the area of
any of the quadrilaterals to the area of the outer triangle is 5 to 21. The areas of all the triangles on the
corners are the same as well, and the ratio of the area of any of the corner triangles to the area of the
outer triangle is 1 to 21. A proof of these ratios is given in the answer to Question 4.5 in Section 4.
Also, we have
area(I) area(4BAC) − 3 area(II) − 3 area(IV ) 5 1 1
= =1−3 −3 =
area(4BAC) area(4BAC) 21 21 7
which should agree with your conjecture in the answer to Question 2.1.
18
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
pieces of the outer triangle to show that it does, in fact, consist of seven triangles of equal areas
to the inner triangle. Continuing with the GeoGebra construction from Exploration 1, complete the
following steps.
1. Use the polygon tool to make sure 4EDF and 4BAC are constructed.
3. Construct midpoints on segments BA, AC and CB. Label these midpoints X, Y and Z, re-
spectively.
4. As in Figure 3 below, construct corner triangles 4BXE, 4AY D and 4CZF , each of which
has a side that is a line segment from a vertex of the inner triangle 4EDF to the closest
midpoint. See https://www.geogebra.org/m/btsubjbp for the construction.
5. On each side of the outer triangle, rotate the corner triangle 180 degrees about the midpoint of
that side clockwise. For example, rotate triangle 4BXE about point X clockwise. Hide any
duplicate point names that are created. See https://www.geogebra.org/m/vhjkzxme
for the construction.
6. Hide each corner triangle and the midpoints of the sides of the outer triangle.
7. Use the polygon tool to construct each of the quadrilaterals on the corners and make each a
different color.
8. In each quadrilateral construct a diagonal as a dashed segment with an endpoint outside the
outer triangle. See https://www.geogebra.org/m/v6ypbk7p for the construction.
As in Figure 4, the construction results in seven triangles, the inner triangle, and six triangles in the
quadrilaterals.
Question 2.3
1. Measure the lengths of all three sides of the inner triangle. Do the same for the triangles formed
inside the quadrilaterals.
19
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
2. What can you conclude about each of the seven triangles? How does this demonstrate your
conjecture from Exploration 1?
In this section, for the case of an equilateral triangle, we will prove the conjecture in the answer to
Question 2.1 as given by Warkentin (1992). We use the coordinate system, formulas from analytic
geometry (such as the distance and slope formulas) and algebra. We will derive a formula which will
confirm the ratio not only when vertices are connected to trisection points but which will also give the
ratio when the vertices are connected to “n-section” points where n ≥ 2.
Without loss of generality, consider an equilateral triangle with sides of length 2a, with a vertex placed
at the origin, and a side along the positive x-axis.
20
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Question 3.1
To find the coordinates of A, drop a perpendicular to the midpoint, M = (a, 0),√of BC. Then
4M AC is a 30-60-90
√ triangle with base of length M C = a and height of M A = 3a. Thus, we
have A = (a, 3a). C 0 is the point (1/n)th of the way from A to C. Thus, we have
√ √ !
√ na + a na 3 − a 3
C 0 = (1 − 1/n)(a, 3a) + (1/n)(2a, 0) = , .
n n
Similarly, we have
√ !
√ a a 3
A0 = (1 − 1/n)(0, 0) + (1/n)(a, a 3) = , and
n n
0 2an − 2a
B = (1 − 1/n)(2a, 0) + (1/n)(0, 0) = ,0 .
n
←→
To find the equation of AB 0 first find its slope
√ √
3a − 0 3n
m= = .
a − (2an − 2a)/n 2−n
21
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Then plug the coordinates of either A or B 0 into y = mx + b and solve for b. Plugging in the
coordinates of B 0 gives
√ √
3n 2an − 2a 2a 3(1 − n)
0= + b =⇒ b = .
2−n n 2−n
←→
Thus, the equation of AB 0 is √ √
3n 2a 3(1 − n)
y= x+ .
2−n 2−n
←→ ←−→
Similarly, solving for the equations of CA0 and BC 0 gives, respectively,
√ √ √
3 2a 3 3(n − 1)
y= x− and y = x. (3)
1 − 2n 1 − 2n n+1
←→ ←−→
As E is the intersection of CA0 and BC 0 , using (3) and solving for the x-coordinate of E,
√ √ √
3 2a 3 3(n − 1)
x− = x =⇒ [(n − 1)(1 − 2n) − (n + 1)]x = −2a(n + 1)
1 − 2n 1 − 2n n+1
−2a(n + 1) a(n + 1)
=⇒ x = = 2 .
(n − 1)(1 − 2n) − (n + 1) n −n+1
←−→
Plugging this x-coordinate into the equation of BC 0 in (3) gives the y-coordinate of E and we have
√ !
a(n + 1) 3a(n − 1)
E= , . (4)
n2 − n + 1 n2 − n + 1
Finding the coordinates of D and F in the way that we found the coordinates of E gives
√ ! √ !
a(n − 1)(n + 1) 3a(n − 1)2 a(2n2 − 4n + 3) 3a
D= , 2 and F = , 2 . (5)
n2 − n + 1 n −n+1 n2 − n + 1 n −n+1
Question 3.2
(a). Find ED, DF and F E. What can you say about 4EDF ?
(b). Show
area(4EDF ) (n − 2)2
= 2 (6)
area(4BAC) n −n+1
by using your result from part (a) to relate the area formulas of 4BAC and 4EDF .
(c). Find
area(4EDF )
area(4BAC)
for n = 3, n = 4 and n = 5.
22
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Using the distance formula, our assumption that n − 2 > 0, n2 − n + 1 > 0 for all n and (4) and (5)
we have
√ √
v !2
u
u a(n − 1)(n + 1) − a(n + 1) 2 a 3(n − 1)2 − a 3(n − 1)
ED = t +
n2 − n + 1 n2 − n + 1
r √
a(n − 2) 2 2a(n − 2) √ 2 (7)
= 2 (n + 1)2 + 3(n − 1) = 2 n −n+1
n −n+1 n −n+1
2a(n − 2)
=√ .
n2 − n + 1
Again, using the distance formula
2a(n − 2)
DF = F E = √ . (8)
n2 − n + 1
Therefore, 4EDF is an equilateral triangle, similar to equilateral triangle 4BAC. Letting a1 be the
altitude of 4EDF and a2 be altitude of 4BAC we then have
a2 AB AB
= =⇒ a2 = a1 .
a1 ED ED
Thus, using (7) we have
(2 − 2)2
=0 (11)
22 − 2 + 1
which is the area of 4EDF as it collapses to a single point. Thus, our formula holds for n ≥ 2.
23
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Question 3.3
(a). Show that only for n = 3
area(4EDF ) (n − 2)2 1
=√ = (12)
area(4BAC) 2
n −n+1 m
for some positive integer m, and thus, only for n = 3 is area(4BAC) a positive integer multiple
of area(4EDF ).
(b). Given your answer from part (a), for what values of n is a construction such as in Section 2.3
possible? Why?
(c). What happens as n → ∞?
Because every unit fraction, i.e., every fraction of the form 1/m for some positive integer m, is less
than or equal to 1/2 consider
area(4EDF ) (n − 2)2 1
= 2 ≤ ⇐⇒ n2 − 7n + 7 ≤ 0 ⇐⇒ 1.21 ≤ n ≤ 5.79.
area(4BAC) n −n+1 2
where the last inequality comes from solving the corresponding quadratic equation in the previous
inequality and by choosing three test points (or by considering the graph of the corresponding upward
turning parabola).
Therefore, for (12) to hold we must have n = 2, 3, 4, 5. But by (10) and (11), among these values of
n, (12) only holds for n = 3 when m = 7. Thus, constructions such as the one in Section 2.3 are
possible only when using trisection points.
However, similar constructions are possible for other values of n. For example, if n = 4 we know
by (10) the ratio of the area of the inner to the outer triangle is 4 to 13. As in Figure 6 below,
we can then divide the inner triangle into four congruent triangles and split the remaining part
of the outer triangle into nine more triangles, each congruent to the inner four. The construction
can be found here https://www.geogebra.org/m/hq3snkae. This construction was taken
from (Warkentin, 1992) which also includes constructions for the cases when n = 5 and n = 6.
For an interactive construction which allows rotation of the corner triangles up to 180 degrees see
https://www.geogebra.org/m/dfppga4m.
We have
(n − 2)2 n2 − 4n + 4 1 − 4/n + 4/n2
lim = lim = lim = 1.
n→∞ n2 − n + 1 n→∞ n2 − n + 1 n→∞ 1 − 1/n + 1/n2
This is consistent with the geometric interpretation of the formula because the inner triangle takes up
more area and tends towards taking up the whole area of the outer triangle as n → ∞.
In this section, we give a proof using Euclidean geometry, without additional mathematical tools im-
plemented in Section 3 or Section 5. This proof relies on the fact that the area of a triangle equals
one-half the length of its base times the length of the altitude and some algebra.
24
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Question 4.1 We know that the area of any triangle equals one-half the length of its base times the
length of the altitude. Using this fact and (1), what can you say about the relationship between
area(4BAB 0 ) and area(4B 0 AC) and the relationship between area(4BF B 0 ) and area(4B 0 F C)?
Use this to show
area(4BAF ) = 2 area(4F AC). (13)
4BAB 0 and 4B 0 AC share an altitude, the perpendicular line segment drawn from A to BC. Let a1
be the length of this altitude. Using (1) we have
B 0 B = CB − CB 0 = CB − (1/3)CB = (2/3)CB.
Thus,
area(4BAB 0 ) = (1/2)a1 B 0 B = a1 (1/3)CB = a1 (CB 0 ) = 2 area(4B 0 AC).
Letting a2 be the length of the altitude drawn from F to BC we see that
25
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Question 4.2 What can you say about the relationship between area(4A0 AC) and area(4BA0 C)
and the relationship between area(4A0 AF ) and area(4BA0 F )? Use this to show
area(4F AC) = 2 area(4BF C). (14)
4A0 AC and 4BA0 C share an altitude and 4A0 AF and 4BA0 F share an altitude. Thus, using (1)
as in Question 4.1, we see
area(4A0 AC) = 2 area(4BA0 C) and area(4A0 AF ) = 2 area(4BA0 F ).
Solving we have,
area(4A0 AC) − area(4A0 AF ) = 2[area(4BA0 C) − area(4BA0 F )]
⇒ area(4F AC) = 2 area(4BF C).
Question 4.3 Use (13) and (14) to show
area(4F AC) = (2/7) area(4BAC). (15)
Notice that 4BAF, 4F AC, and 4BF C do not overlap and make up 4BAC.
Using (13) and (14) we have
area(4BAC) = area(4BAF ) + area(4F AC) + area(4BF C)
= 2 area(4F AC) + area(4F AC) + (1/2) area(4F AC)
= (7/2)area(4F AC)
which gives (15). Using similar arguments as above we also have
area(4BAD) = (2/7) area(4BAC), and
(16)
area(4BEC) = (2/7) area(4BAC).
26
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
In this section, we find the ratio of the area of the inner triangle to the area of the outer triangle using
powerful tools of linear algebra. We first introduce some facts that we will need. We first introduce
facts of linear algebra that we use to solve the problem in the case of a right triangle and then, finding
the correct linear transformation, we solve the problem in general.
that is, D is the determinant of the matrix with columns (a1 , a2 )> and (b1 , b2 )> . Then we have
area(P ) = |D|.
Thus, for a triangle T which has the vectors (a1 , a2 ) and (b1 , b2 ) as sides
area(T ) = (1/2)|D|.
Discussion and proofs of Facts 1 and 2 can be found in Farin & Hansford (2013) and at Khan
Academy (2019). Fact 3 can be seen by considering, as in Figure 8, the image of line segment p1 p2
under linear transformation L,
27
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
for s and t, that is, find “how far”, as given by s and t, respectively, along each of the vectors we
move to land on the intersection.
Thus, we have
2 4 1
F1 = (0, 1) + (6/7) , −1 = ,
3 7 7
Question 5.2 As you did in Question 5.1, find the coordinates of E1 and D1 .
To find E1 solve
1 2 1 1
t , = 0, + s 1, − (18)
3 3 3 3
28
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
1 2 c a 1/3 (1/3)c + (2/3)a c a c
L , = = = + (2/3) −
3 3 0 b 2/3 (2/3)b 0 b 0
0
= C + (2/3)(A − C) = C .
In particular, we have L(4B1 A1 C1 ) = 4BAC and L(4E1 D1 F1 ) = 4EDF . Thus, by Linear
Algebra Fact 2 and (19) we have
area(4EDF ) area[L(4E1 D1 F1 )] det(L)[area(4E1 D1 F1 )]
= = = 1/7.
area(4BAC) area[L(4B1 A1 C1 )] det(L)[area(4B1 A1 C1 )]
For an interactive construction that maps the right triangle by a linear transformation to 4BAC and
in which you can specify a, b, and c see https://www.geogebra.org/m/egfp2mj6.
29
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
6 F INAL R EMARKS
The one-seventh area problem provides an opportunity for instructors to extend a geometric viewpoint
beyond a geometry course as geometric reasoning and visualization complement algebraic thinking in
linear algebra in line with (Zorn et al., 2015) (Content Recommendation 6, p. 12). Instructors can use
the many problems presented in this paper to demonstrate applications of geometric constructions in
GeoGebra, coordinate geometry, Euclidean geometry, and linear algebra and the connections among
all of them.
Section 5.1 can be introduced even to students who have not yet completed linear algebra course
work but can also be used to demonstrate the close connection between geometry and linear algebra
for those who have. Among many questions that naturally arise, a student might try to apply linear
algebra to the formula (6) in Question 3.2 to all triangles by finding the correct linear transformations
and using its properties.
Many generalizations, variations and similar problems as the one-seventh area triangle problem ex-
ist and they can all be considered using the approaches of geometric construction, coordinate and
Euclidean geometry and linear algebra as demonstrated in this paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to acknowledge the editors and reviewers of the paper for valuable feedback and
suggestions.
R EFERENCES
30
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
Khan Academy (2019). Matrix Transformations. Retrieved June 23, 2019 from https:
//www.khanacademy.org/math/linear-algebra/matrix-transformations/
determinant-depth/v/linear-algebra-determinant-as-scaling-factor.
Lehrer, R. & Chazan, D. (2012). Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of
Geometry and Space. Routledge.
Man, Y. (2009). On Feynman’s Triangle Problem and the Routh Theorem. Teaching Mathematics
and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 28(1):16–20.
Steinhaus, H. (1999). Mathematical Snapshots. Courier Corporation.
Warkentin, D. R. (1992). Unit Fractional Divisions. The Mathematics Teacher, 85(78):597–598.
Wikipedia (2019). One-seventh Area Triangle. Retrieved June 23, 2019 from https://en.
wikipedia.org/wiki/One-seventh_area_triangle.
Zorn, P., Schumacher, C. S., & Siegel, M. J. (2015). 2015 CUPM Curriculum Guide to Majors in the
Mathematical Sciences. Mathematical Association of America.
31
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
A A PPENDIX : W ORKSHEETS
2. What relationships, if any, appear to exist between triangles 4BAC and 4EDF ? Justify your
conjecture with evidence from your sketch. Include screenshots of your work along with written
commentary.
3. Rigorously prove your conjecture using Euclidean geometry by answering the questions below.
Question 1 The area of any triangle equals one-half the length of its base times the length of the
altitude. Using this fact and (1), what can you say about the relationship between area(4BAB 0 ) and
area(4B 0 AC) and the relationship between area(4BF B 0 ) and area(4B 0 F C)? Use this to show
area(4BAF ) = 2 area(4F AC). (2)
Question 2 What can you say about the relationship between area(4A0 AC) and area(4BA0 C) and
the relationship between area(4A0 AF ) and area(4BA0 F )? Use this to show
area(4F AC) = 2 area(4BF C). (3)
Question 3 Use (2) and (3) to show
area(4F AC) = (2/7) area(4BAC). (4)
Notice that 4BAF, 4F AC and 4BF C do not overlap and make up 4BAC.
Question 4 Using similar arguments you used to show (4) you have
area(4BAD) = (2/7) area(4BAC) and area(4BEC) = (2/7) area(4BAC). (5)
Using (4) and (5) determine the relationship between area(4BAC) and area(4EDF ).
32
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
2. Calculate the ratio of the area of each of the “corner” triangles II, III and IV to the area of outer
triangle, 4BAC. What do you notice? Justify your conjecture with evidence from your sketch.
Include screenshots of your work along with written commentary.
3. Calculate the ratio of the area of each of the quadrilaterals, V, VI, and VII, to the area of outer
triangle, 4BAC. What do you notice? Justify your conjecture with evidence from your sketch.
Include screenshots of your work along with written commentary.
4. Rigorously prove your conjecture using Euclidean geometry by answering the questions below.
Use these relationships and CB 0 = (1/3)CB to prove your conjecture about the ratio of the area of
triangle IV to the area of 4BAC? Can you make similar arguments about areas of triangles II and
III?
Question 2 Use your answer to the previous question to prove your conjecture about the ratio of the
areas of V, VI, and VII to the area of 4BAC.
33
North American GeoGebra Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 2162-3856
A similar construction technique as seen in the picture proof of Section 2.3 can be used to make a
conjecture about the ratio of the area of an inner parallelogram to the area of an outer parallelogram.
Construct a parallelogram with midpoints on each side. Then, construct segments from the vertices
of the parallelogram to the midpoints so the segments from opposite vertices do not intersect. The
intersection points of these segments are the vertices of the inner parallelogram. Use the technique
of rotating and dividing pieces of the outer parallelogram to create four quadrilaterals as shown in
Figure 12.
Question 1 What conjecture can you make based on this construction? Measure areas and use the
“drag test” as in Section 2.1 to confirm your conjecture. If instead of choosing midpoints you choose
trisection points then what is the ratio of the outer to the inner parallelogram?
34