Notice of Personal

Civil and criminal Liability

On this 28th day of January, 2019

Notice is hereby served and given that:

It is well established law that when an agent of government acts within the lawful limitations of his or her
office that agent enjoys what is called limited liability. However, when such an agent acts outside those
limitations, ALL limitations of liability (aka. Immunities) vanish completely!

One legal term to be used here is Jurisdiction, where agents of government do not have Jurisdiction to use
their powers to endanger the health, safety and welfare of the people to whom they are believed to be
protecting. To wit, should there be decisions by agents of government made which can and will endanger the
health, safety, welfare and RIGHTS of an individual, no matter how long a time may pass, such agents can
and will be held liable to answer and to defend charges both civil and criminal as may apply. As such
activities to do damage are far outside the authorities which may be held by such agents, any use of public
funds to protect, defend or otherwise invoke lost immunities would also include the criminal misuse of public
funds and any other other public resources. It has long been held that in matters such as these there is no
statute of limitations available to protect or defend such activities involving the abuse of authority as such
activities are null and void at their inception even when applied “under color of law” (aka appearance of
legitimacy).

As with the current president as recently set by actions used against out President and his attorneys, any and
all attorneys who may participate in such criminal activities would be subject to investigation as co-
conspirators and subject to having their homes, offices and properties raided and inspected for additional
evidence of their participation in such wrongdoings. Additionally, any and all “Grants of Immunities” given
to protect those who would also conspire to act in violation of law or “Under color of Law” would and are
null and void as such activities are simply an expansion of such conspiracies and would constitute an attempt
to protect additional co-conspirators.

Attempts to convert Constitutional activities into “Crimes” are themselves Criminal in nature and practice!
Such attempts to convert a Constitutional activity into a Crime have been long established to be a civil or
criminal violation prosecutable under a Federal Authority.

Nowhere is it stated that any agent of government has the power to endanger health, safety, welfare and
RIGHTS of individuals to whom government is charged to protect. As it has well been established that
Judges are subject to the loss of immunities (limited liability), so too are such pains and penalties extended to
all other agents of government.

“That an officer or employee of a State or one of its subdivisions is deemed to be acting under
“color of law” ………. committed in the fulfillment of the tasks and obligations assigned to
him. Monroe v Pape, (1961) US 167.

Actions by state officers and employees, even if unauthorized or in excess of authority, can
be actions under “color of law” Stringer v Dilger, (1963) 313 F2d 536.

“ .. a judge loses all immunity when he acts in absence of all jurisdiction ...”
Lucarell v McNair, (1972) 453 F2d 836.
It should be Noted: If a judge can lose immunity so too can any other agent of government!

Notice of Personal Civil and Criminal Liability Page 1 of 2

Jurisdiction is a reference to an authority to act and there is no authority to endanger the health, safety,
welfare or RIGHTS of individuals in any frame of time. It is also well established law that agents of
government are required to know all facts and consequences of their actions and are therefore can become
personally responsible for any and all violations which may occur when acting outside those requirements
nullifying any and all excuses of “not knowing” or the transference of responsibility to others who may have
been relied upon for information.

An example would be in the use of “Warrants” to justify an “Arrest” or “Prosecution” when such “Warrants”
can not be verified as being lawful in nature or scope or Jurisdiction as is common with so called “Traffic
Stops”! In addressing the unlawful use of Police Powers to generate revenue, the New Jersey Supreme Court
Ruled that Police are NOT permitted to stop EXCEPT where the commission of a crime has been observed!
The Pennsylvania Courts has similarly banned the use of “RADAR” by municipalities because of their
unlawful use of police Powers to generate revenue. Most if not ALL Police “Traffic Stops” are based upon
the unlawful use of police powers to generate revenue under what are called “Quasi-criminal” (a political
invention) activities used to circumvent Constitutional Protections to gain political and financial profit!

The use of “Electronic Devices” means has been used as a very profitable means to use police Powers to
generate revenue where NO ACTUAL CRIME is in existence! Such has been the abusive use of
“RADAR”, “Facial Recognition Software,” “Tag Scanning Devices” and other computer related means to
“justify” to use of Police Powers for no other purpose than to help generate revenue (a multi Trillion Dollar Racket)!

President L. B. Johnson (a Democrat) attempted to make certain government agents immune from
prosecution or to put it more clearly; “Above the Law!” That attempt was struck down making it clear at NO
GOVERNMENT AGENT was to be permitted to act ABOVE THE LAW!

It has become a common practice by government agents to use the Administrative Court System to
circumvent any and all Constitutional Protections under the color of law or the pretense of “Contractual /
Franchise Waver” COMPELLED by statutory enactments. The words to remember are unalienable or
inalienable (either word) when referring to the RIGHTS and all other Constitutional Protections. This is to
say that Statutory attempts are clear and present evidence of frauds and conspiracies to Plunder and Trespass
upon the Rights and Protections GUARANTEED by Federal. State and Commonwealth Constitutions!

Any and ALL attempts to refuse to accept or otherwise investigate such limitations are herein after to be
considered willful participations in the civil and criminal activities of the otherwise very profitable
activities which include but are not limited to Racketeering and Fraudulent use of political power all of which
are prosecutable under Federal Civil and Criminal Actions.

Just this Year (May of 2018) the United States Supreme Court has unambiguously ruled that previously held
beliefs by lower courts to be invalid where a “Standard existed” of “The Expectation of Privacy” did not exist
in certain circumstances thereby invalidating certain constitutional protections. They unanimously held that
the RIGHTS of individuals ARE to be VIGOROUSLY protected by all Agents of Government! Note: that
the use of public funds to defend a personal charge constitutes an unlawful use of public finds!

It has been consistently held that ALL government activities are subject, first to the protections of all
RIGHTS, and second, that any and ALL Agents of Government who violate that mandate are subject to
prosecution to the FULLEST EXTENT of the LAW and are to be held to to a higher standard of knowing
and understanding these strict limitations of their government offices!

NOTICE is hereby given and SERVED.

“Ignorance Is No Excuse!”
Take Notice and Govern Yourselves Accordingly

Notice of Personal Civil and Criminal Liability Page 2 of 2