Synthesis and Characterization of CSA
Synthesis and Characterization of CSA
net/publication/331412553
CITATION READS
1 100
5 authors, including:
A. Manikandan
Bharath University
208 PUBLICATIONS 4,040 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Magnetic nanomaterials synthesis & characterization for bio-medical, photocatalytic and energy storage device applications. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Gunasegaran Varatharajan on 16 May 2020.
Synthesizing Coconut Shell Ash (CSA) is a kind of manufacturing the powder form ash material
which can be incorporated in the composite as reinforcement. This ash material used to improve the
mechanical properties of metals when added in Metal Matrix Composite’s (MMC’s) based prepara-
tion. The fabrication of CSA powder is the preparatory functional part, because it varies its properties
based on the manufacturing method. In this work, a novel method is used to manufacture the ash
powder and to study the physical and chemical properties of CSA particles. CSA particles are syn-
thesized in open fire hearth. Physical properties such as pH, ash content, moisture content, loss on
ignition, density, surface area, pore volume and pore dia were studied. Chemical characterization
study is carried out for chemical composition analysis, the morphology of ash particles, percent-
age of various elements present and various chemical functional groups present in the samples
through XRF, SEM/EDS and FTIR techniques respectively. Crystallite structures, average particle
size, and thermal stability of CSA were investigated by XRD and TGA methods. The result shows
that the total maximum IP:percentage
5.189.201.171 2 , Al2Mon,
of SiOOn: O3 and18Fe 2 O3 2019
Mar (∼84%) will increase the strength of
07:12:08
MMC’s. The total percentage Copyright:
of Ca andAmerican
K is minimumScientific Publishers
than the other CSA preparation methods, so
Delivered
that it will reduce the corrosion. And also producebylowIngenta
density ash powder (1.65 gm/cc) which will
reduce the weight and density of MMC’s. This CSA powder can be used in MMC where maximum
strength–weight ratio and wear resistance is required.
Keywords: Ash Properties, Coconut Shell Ash, Nanomaterials, SEM, XRD, FTIR.
reinforced with matrix material to increase the strength, 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
wear resistance and also to reduce the density and weight 3.1. pH Measurement
of the fabricated composites.13 The application of nano The pH value of CSA was measured by digital pH meter
sized ash particles makes light weight and stronger struc- (Fig. 2) as per ASTM standard 3838-80. 1 gm sample
tural composite materials. The main objective of this work was added in 100 ml double distilled water. The mixture
is to focus on the utilization of extensively available agro was stirred at measured temperature 35.2 C till the con-
waste CSA in a useful manner by adding it to the alu- stant pH occurred. The pH value is measured by digital
minium alloy to produce aluminium hybrid composites by pH meter and value obtained is 7.47. These values indi-
stir casting method. cated that the CSA particles having base and not present
acid and alkaline materials.
2. EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS
3.2. Ash Content
Dry coconut shells were gathered from the nearby agricul-
tural area, oil mills and food production places. In order Ash content (quantity) of CSA was studied by heating ash
to remove the moisture content and dirt, the shells were at 800 C for 1 hour using muffle furnace. 1 gm of sam-
cleaned and sun dried for two to three days. The dried ple was taken in a silica crucible and it is heated upto
to 800 C in a furnace. During this process, the crucible
coconut shells were pulverized to powder form and placed
is kept open. After the required heating, the crucible is
in graphite crucible, then burned in open air till the powder
cooled in desiccators and the weight of ash is measured
gets complete combustion. After the complete combustion
by a digital weighing machine. The following equation is
in the open hearth, the coconut shell ash powders were
used to find the ash content presents in CSA particle.
allowed to hearth cooling at room temperature, before the
removal of CSA from crucible to avoid the formation of M − M1
% Ash content = 3 × 100 (1)
charcoal. M2 − M1
Figures 1(a) and (b) show the formation of coconut Where, M1 —Mass of empty crucible (gm), M2 —Crucible
shells powder and coconut shell ash powder. After success- with a mass of ash (gm), M3 —Crucible with dried a mass
ful completion of synthesizing the CSA, different charac- of ash (gm).
terization test has been done on CSA. Physical properties By using the above equation, percentage of ash content
such as pH value, density, ash content, moisture content,
IP: 5.189.201.171 On: Mon,present
18 Marin2019
CSA07:12:08
is 68.5% which shows that the quantity
loss on ignition, a grain size of CSA and surface
Copyright: area Scientific
American of ash isPublishers
typical one when compared with other research
including pore volume, pore size of CSA wereDelivered studied byworks.
Ingenta
by corresponding testing methods as per standard mea-
surement techniques. Chemical characterization study was 3.3. Moisture Content
carried out for chemical composition analysis, the mor- Moisture content is studied as per standard procedure.14
phology of ash particles, percentage of various elements It is analyzed by heating CSA to 105 ± 5 C for 1 hour in
present and various chemical functional groups present in the furnace and cooled to room temperature in desiccators.
the samples through XRF, SEM/EDS and FTIR techniques Dried samples were weighed and calculated by the below
respectively. Crystallite structures, average particle size, equation.
and thermal stability of CSA were investigated by XRD M − M2
hm = 1 × 100 (2)
and TGA methods. M2
(a) (b)
3.11. FT-IR
A FTIR Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer
(SHIMADZU) was used to study the functional groups
present in the coconut shell ash FTIR (Model-FT/
IR-4700typeA, at CSIR-CLRI-Chennai. The qualitative
analysis of coconut shell ash was analyzed by the
IP: 5.189.201.171 On: Mon,FT-IR 18 Mar 2019 measurements
spectral 07:12:08 were depicted in Figure 5.
Figure 3. (a) SEM image of CSA and (b) EDAX analyses. American Scientific
Copyright: Publishers
The FT-IR
Delivered by Ingenta spectra were recorded in the range of
400 cm−1 –4000 cm−1 respectively. Five main bands are
3.10. X-ray Diffraction Analysis
seen in Figure 5. The peak at 3185 cm−1 was due to O–H
An identification of unknown crystalline materials, vari-
stretching mode of vibration and appearing peaks in the
ous functional groups present in the element of CSA was
range of 2804 cm−1 was due to C–H stretching vibra-
analyzed by using Powder XRD, methods at CSIR-CLRI-
tions. The broad peak observed at 1057 cm−1 was due to
Chennai. The samples were exposed to X-ray genera-
the stretching mode of vibration of C–O respectively. The
tor running at 30 kv. The 2 angle for the machine
band at 775 cm−1 was attributed to C–H in benzene rings
ranges from 3 –80 with a sampling step of 0.005 at a
and aromatic ring, the observed FT-IR spectral measure-
scan speed of 4 deg/min were employed. Crystallite size
ments indicates the presence of ash.
was calculated using XRD result by means of scherrer’s
equation.
3.12. Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
The crystal structures of coconut shell ash were inves-
tigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) as shown in the The thermal behavior of ash was studied by the Thermo
Table II. The XRD technique is used and the presence Gravimetric (TG) analysis. The TGA for ash has been
of SiO2 , Al2 O3 , Fe2 O3 was found as shown in Figure 4.
The predominant peaks SiO2 observed at 26.69 which is Table II. Structural properties of coconut shell ash.
in good agreement with the JCPDS data 00-001-0649.19 S. no. Peak position 2 ( ) FWHM (B) Crystallite size (D)
Quartz is the major component contributed to crystalline
phase formed in the sample. The oxides like SiO2 , Al2 O3 1 20.84 0.22 38.38
2 26.69 0.18 47.45
and Fe2 O3 make the matrix harder and more durable 3 35.56 0.44 21.80
which results in improved physical-mechanical properties. 4 39.45 0.16 55.13
5 42.46 0.34 26.20
6 45.86 0.23 39.30
Table I. Chemical composition of CSA.
7 50.16 0.13 68.93
Elements SiO2 Al2 O3 Fe2 O3 CaO K2 O TiO2 8 54.88 0.17 55.04
9 59.92 0.24 41.66
Mass% 65.874 4.778 14.225 5.773 8.998 0.323 10 68.29 0.46 21.81
99.0
335.20 °C
98.70% present in CSA and proposed to use CSA as particulate
reinforcement in MMCs.
98.5 534.59 °C
98.32%
.
References and Notes
Residue:
98.0
97.48 % 1. https://www.bioenergyconsult.com/coconut-biomass/.
2. T. L. Ting, R. P. Jaya, N. A. Hassan, H. Yaacob, D. S. Jayanti, and
M. A. Mohd Ariffine, J. Teknologi 78, 85 (2016).
97.5 3. A. Apasi, P. B. Madakson, D. S. Yawas, and V. S. Aigbodion, Tribo
in Industry 34, 36 (2012).
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 4. M. Y. Ahmad Fuad, I. Yaako, Z. A. Mohd Ishak, and A. K. Mohd
Temperature (°C) Omar, Poly Testing 12, 107 (1993).
5. K. K. Alaneme, B. O. Ademilua, and M. O. Bodunrin, Tribo in
Figure 6. TGA analysis of coconut shell ash. Industry 35, 25 (2013).
6. P. Aggarwal, R. Pratap Singh, and Y. Aggarwal, Cogent Engineering 14. K. Wesche, I. L. Alonso, I. L. Alonso, I. Bijen, P. Schubert, W. Vom
2, 1 (2015). Berg, and R. Rankers, Mater. Struct./Matdriaux et Constructions
7. K. Kaviyarasui, E. Manikandan, J. Kennedy, M. Jayachandran, and 22, 299 (1989).
M. Maaza, Adv. Mater. Lett. 7, 100 (2016). 15. J. Bienia, M. Walczak, B. Surowska, and J. Sobczak, J. Optoelectro.
8. A. H. Shah, M. Basheer Ahamed, E. Manikandan, R. Chandramohan, Adv. Mater. 5, 493 (2003).
and M. Iydroose, J. Mater. Sci: Materials in Electronics 24, 2302 16. V. S. Aigbodion, S. B. Hassan, T. Ause, and G. B. Nyior, J. Minerals
(2013). Mater. Charact. Engg. 9, 67 (2010).
9. E. Manikandan, J. Kennedy, G. Kavitha, K. Kaviyarasu, M. Maaza, 17. B. Sathyaseelan, E. Manikandan, I. Baskaran, K. Senthilnathan,
B. K. Panigrahi, and U. Kamachi Mudali, J. Alloys Compd. 647, 141 K. Sivakumar, M. K. Moodley, Rasiah Ladchumananandasivam, and
(2015). M. Maaza, J. Alloys Compd. 694, 556 (2017).
10. Stanislav V. Vassilev, D. Baxter, L. K. Andersen, and C. G. Vassileva, 18. K. T. Lee, Subhash Bhatia, and Abdul Rahman Mohamed, Springer,
Fuel 89, 913 (2010). J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 7, 16 (2005).
11. P. Lakshmikanthan and B. Prabu, J. Balkan Tribo. Ass. 22, 4008 19. R. Govindarao, R. I. Ganguly, R. R. Dash, P. S. Prakash Rao G. S.
(2016). Reddy, and S. K. Singh, Springer, Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 68, 951
12. Hussein M. Hamada, Gul Ahmed Jokhio, Fadzil Mat Yahaya, (2015).
and Ali M. Humada, IOP Conf. Series: Mat. Sci. Engg. 342, 1 20. R. S. S. Raju and G. S. Rao, Tribo in Industry 39, 364 (2017).
(2018). 21. C. Rial and J. M. Jimenez-Mateos, Thermochim. Acta 259, 235
13. K. Srinivasa Prasad and G. Swami Naidu, Int. Conf. on Electri- (1995).
cal, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) 16, 3839 22. M. Fan and R. C. Brown, Amer. Chem. Soci. Energy and Fuels
(2016). 15, 1414 (2001).