[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
332 views1 page

Assignment 3.1 STS

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

The process of allowing the higher class of society to slow down and allowing the lower class to

catch up is the framework of de-development. This doesn't mean making a wealthy man poor
but decreasing their use of wealth. Their use of resources is about 8 hectares, just as in the
United States, but in the country of Ghana, it is only 1.8, which is about the amount one should
have in a de-developing state. The de-developing framework is about moving the principle of
development from economic growth to life expectancy and happiness. Growth has been the
basis of progress for the past 70 years. We should look at communities where people live long
and comfortable lives at relatively low levels of income and consumption as indicators of
productive life, not as basket cases that need to be transformed into Western models. De-
Developing is all about capturing the growth in one country down to poor or de-cutting,
happiness depends on contentment, not on money.
The traditional framework's main goal is “growth” to make development and bring prosperity
to the lives of people living in the society in the past seventy years. Even though the global
economy in 1890 did grow by 380%, unfortunately, the only people who benefited are those
who belong to the upper class while those who live in poverty continue to suffer. In short
focusing on growth making the wealthy people richer while poor people can’t progress their
status in this society. While the de-development framework by Jason Hickel, rich countries
should “de-develop or catch down” to give way for poverty-stricken countries. In order to catch
down, people should consider quality over quantity and avoid overconsumption in rich
countries that can lead to a global crisis in the long run. This concludes that the traditional
framework is not working anymore because we have grown already, and we need a different
solution to attack the main problem by de-developing.
According to Jason Hickel, we can end poverty by changing the rules of the global
economy where he emphasize that rich countries de-develop is a way of pushing poor countries
to “catch-up” with rich ones, they should be getting rich countries to “catch-down”. In other
words, the main indicator of development which is growth isn’t the option anymore because
we’ve already grown too much. Overconsumption in rich countries is one of the global crises
which also give the reason why growth is no longer an option for the development of poor
countries because it tends to blowing past our planetary boundaries at breakneck speed.
Moreover, Hickel believes that in order to poor countries to catch up with them and stop
moving forward which can result into widening the gap between them. This summarizes that
Jason Hickel wants to eradicate poverty thru rich countries can de-develop by reducing their
consumption. In other words, rich countries can “de-develop” by sticking to quality over
quantity.

You might also like