318 Northcote
318 Northcote
318 Northcote
Tailored professional development (PD) programmes assist university teaching staff to capitalise
on the educational use of technology. To supplement on-campus PD support, staff at Avondale
College of Higher Education developed a self-help online resource, Moodle's Little Helper
(MLH), that has since become an integral and accepted component of the institution's PD
landscape. Since Avondale's overall PD program is built upon the theoretical underpinnings of
heutagogy (Hase, 2009; Hase & Kenyon, 2003), a self-determined learning theory, the purpose
and nature of the resource also reflects the key principles of this educational philosophy. Adopting
a utilisation-focused research methodology (Patton, 2011) ensured staff needs were identified and
met within MLH's customised content, homegrown style and iterative development. The outcomes
from the first stages of the study provide commentary on how the theoretical principles of
heutagogy can be employed to gain greater reach and efficiency when PD support is in high
demand.
Introduction
Online education has become a global phenomenon. As online learning and teaching technologies have
developed to the extent where they are easily accessible and usable around the world, so too the demand for
their use has influenced the nature of higher education courses (Hacifazlioglu, Sacli, & Yengin, 2007). This
demand, in turn, puts pressure on those who deliver such courses - university administrators, course developers
and lecturers (Rienties, Brouwer, & Lygo-Baker, 2013). Professional development (PD) programmes and
resources are needed to assist academic staff in developing online course design and online teaching abilities. As
staff become increasingly familiar with online contexts, the provision of self-help online resources can meet
some of the unpredictable, chaotic and complex needs of university teaching staff.
This paper reports on the early stages of a research project in which the development and use of an online
resource, Moodle's Little Helper (MLH), was investigated. By drawing on the theoretical principles of
heutagogy, the study of self-determined learning (Hase, 2009; Hase & Kenyon, 2003), the resource was
designed to provide easily accessible instructional guidance to academic staff about online course design and
online teaching. The strategies that comprise utilisation-focused research design (Patton, 2011) supplied an
appropriate methodological direction to ensure the needs and feedback from resource users were incorporated
into its design, development and ongoing evaluation. Together, these pedagogical and methodological principles
formed the theoretical underpinnings of the study and continue to drive future stages of the research.
Background
Ongoing, innovative and customised PD programmes are essential to empower educators as they manage their
changing roles and develop the necessary competencies for online course delivery (Baran, Correia, &
Thompson, 2011). However, the PD requirements of university staff often outweigh their institution's ability to
cater for their requests, a situation that has become more prevalent with the advent of new technologies. To
resolve this imbalance, universities have increasingly capitalised on the affordances of capacity-building PD
programmes (for example, Symes, 2005) which can enhance teachers’ skills and somewhat reduce the demand
on restricted professional learning support resources. This process can be promoted through using the online
tools that will eventually become one's teaching resources and methods, the result of which can ultimately equip
a tertiary teacher with confidence and competence in online teaching (Salmon, 2013; Ward & Kushner Benson,
2010). Academic staff are also known to benefit from the use of locally constructed, in-house, situated learning
experiences (Guskey & Yoon, 2009). Nevertheless, while capacity-building PD strategies and homegrown
resources may reduce the pressures placed on PD staff and resources, the unpredictable nature of the learning
journeys experienced by academic staff, as they develop as online instructors, requires that PD support be highly
flexible and accessible. Hase and Kenyon’s (2003) concept of heutagogy was found to be particularly
appropriate to inform the development of a flexible self-accessible support resource about online teaching as the
self-help nature of the theory “recognizes that people learn when they are ready and that this is most likely to
occur quite randomly, chaotically and in the face of ambiguity and need” (pp. 3-4).
While adult learners within PD settings often report feeling insecure and out of their depth as they develop skills
within the somewhat unfamiliar context of online education (Northcote, Reynaud, Beamish, Martin, & Gosselin,
2011), heutagogical principles propose that this premise may be an ideal context for learning, at the point “when
there is a gap in understanding that creates curiosity, confusion or a gentle unease” (Hase, 2009, p. 44). In fact,
the concept of heutagogy suggests that incorporating emotions into the learning process “may make learning
more indelible” (p. 44). Furthermore, the educational theory of heutagogy lends itself to “spirals of reflection”
(Canning & Callan, 2010, p. 71) which aligns closely to the cycles of iterative evaluation patterns recommended
as part of Patton's (2011) utilisation-focused research methodology, used in this research.
Methodology
The choice of research approach was driven by the study’s aim: to develop an efficient online resource that
directly met the needs of both novice and experienced online educators in a higher education institution. To
achieve this, the needs of academic staff were identified and incorporated into the design and ongoing
development of the MLH resource. These research processes were guided by the following research questions:
• What are the needs of academic staff as they develop online course design and teaching skills?
• How can varied needs of academic staff be incorporated into an online self-help support resource?
• How is the self-help resource used by academic staff to develop online course design and teaching skills?
The methodology of this study adopted a utilisation-focused design (Patton, 2011) to guide the development and
evaluation of the content and structure of resource. This research approach also suited the long-term nature of
the study by ensuring that future iterations of the resource continue to incorporate the contextual and dynamic
needs of staff at the institution. This participatory research methodology was enacted by inviting resource users
to contribute to its initial design and its successive modifications through journals and online surveys. Further
data were gathered through LMS analytics and interviews with HelpDesk staff. The completed stages of the
study to date, outlined in Table 1, are progressively interdependent and informative, in that each stage further
directs the subsequent stages while simultaneously contributing to the ongoing development of the resource.
Table 1: Progressive stages of the study, including data gathering and analysis processes
By incorporating a range of face-to-face and online data gathering processes and tools, both the users and the
developers of MLH were provided with multiple opportunities to refine the resource collaboratively. To
determine the main areas of need for academic teaching staff, the data gathered from reflection journals kept by
the researchers and online survey responses from staff users of the resource were open-coded using qualitative
analysis software (NVivo). Themes and areas of need identified through this process consequently inform future
iterations of the resource. Data continues to be gathered about the needs of academic teaching staff through a
range of sources including email, Help Desk requests, individual consultations, LMS learning analytics, survey
responses from resource users and observations of PD officers. Other research at the institution that is tracking
the development of foundational online teaching skills has found that online teaching abilities are developing
across academic staff in all faculties (Gosselin & Northcote, 2013; Northcote et al., 2011).
736
design and teaching skills. Based on an analysis of these data, twelve areas of need were identified which have
since been used to inform the structure of the MLH resource, including: instructions about setting up and
structuring courses; uploading resources; learner interactivity; media enhancements; and quality control. A
hyperlinked menu enables quick access, not necessarily in any predetermined order, to text-based instructional
resources, video tutorials, course exemplars, showcases of best practice and workshop materials (see Figure 1)
to suit the dynamic and non-linear nature of adult learning (Hase, 2009). The use of Patton's (2011) utilisation-
focused methodology facilitated this development process by regularly engaging a wide range of academic staff,
at various stages of development as online educators, in the process of developing and evaluating the resource.
Since the resource has been made available for access, it has provided a mixture of what Bell and Morris (2009)
refer to as a “conceptions-based approach” and a “practice-based approach” (pp. 702-703) to professional
learning in that staff have reported its impact on their development of understanding about online teaching as
well as their practical skills. In discussions about heutagogy, these understandings and skills have been referred
to as “competencies and capabilities” (Blaschke, 2012, p. 59). They are developed within a learner-driven
context, which is one of the central tenets of Hase and Kenyon's concept of heutagogy (2003). This appears to
have had a capacity-building impact on academic staff who, before the resource became available, often
expressed feelings of self-consciousness about their regular access to on-campus support services. Now,
however, staff regularly and independently access the online resource, MLH, for guidance about online
education. According to LMS analytics, the resource recorded almost 1500 hits between February and March
2014. Analysis of these hits with associated evaluation data has revealed that both inexperienced and
experienced online educators who use the resource reported on how its flexibility helped them to find the
assistance they sought: “I tend to graze: going to whatever meets my immediate need. That tends to be more the
top-end kind of skills in various sections” and “At this stage I have concentrated on the ‘setting up’ of the
basics, and now need to take some time to look at some more of the ‘examples’ and to work on different ways of
facilitating online interactivity”. The diversity of responses from academic staff suggests that it caters to some
extent for the complexity of their online teaching abilities and the non-linearity of their learning (Hase, 2009).
The resource was housed within the familiar confines of the institution’s LMS. Because the academic teachers
at the institution who use the resource were given control of their learning within a familiar, authentic and
situated context (Bell & Morris, 2009), they appeared to be motivated to learn about online teaching by using
MLH. Just as Ashton and Newman (2006) found that “heutagogy prepares students for self-determined lifelong
learning” (p. 825), this study has shown how a resource embedded with heutagogical principles can also support
ongoing teacher learning by providing adult learners with greater autonomy (Blaschke, 2012). The homegrown
nature of MLH provided an online space from which teachers could privately gain access to information they
were ready to incorporate into their teaching: “learning occurs when the learner is ready rather than when the
teacher expects or intends for it to occur” (Hase, 2009, p. 44). Similarly, the heutagogical approach to designing
learning resources has the capacity to meet the demands of adult learners by preparing them to engage in
complexity in the workplace (Blaschke, 2012).
The problem associated with providing efficient and accessible instructional guidance on how to design
effective online courses to staff at a tertiary education institution has been partially solved through the provision
of this online resource. While the MLH provides some solutions to many of the queries about online teaching
and course design raised by academic teaching staff, the researchers are still aware of the need for some targeted
face-to-face, on-campus PD activities such as workshops, showcases and colloquia, on the topics of online
teaching, online course design and online learning. Although some staff still require on-campus support, the
MLH resource has provided an efficient way to meet many of the needs of Avondale's academic teaching staff
who are developing skills and understanding of online course design and teaching. One limitation of the
737
resource that has emerged to date is the lack of engagement by academic staff in the collaborative tools
embedded in the MLH resource. As such, an interactive online collaborative learning community, as described
by Bell and Morris (2009) as an effective PD space, has yet to be established within the resource as staff tend to
make use of MLH on an individual basis. Instead, the collaboration instigated by use of the resource tends to
occur during informal on-campus conversations or via email. The future use of collaborative tools will be the
focus of future iterations of the resource.
Conclusion
Because PD programmes can be costly, the efficiency of staff development strategies are frequently under
scrutiny. The outcomes of this project demonstrate how a set of theoretically informed strategies, primarily
focused on self-determined learning, can produce a time and resource efficient solution to dealing with the high
demands made on university PD resources. Moodle's Little Helper is an example of institution-wide technology
integration which provides staff with just-in-time best practice teaching guidelines, instructions, practical and
pedagogical tips, and exemplars for online education contexts. Findings from the early stages of the study have
illustrated how the methodological principles of utilisation-focused research combined effectively with the
theoretical underpinnings of heutagogy, especially the self-determined, learner-driven principles of the theory
that recognise the role of emotions and the non-linearity of adult learning. Together, these educational and
methodological approaches guided the design, development and implementation of a PD resource to support
online teaching within a higher education institution. Learning about teaching online was situated within the
online context. Both the development and use of the resource has revitalised online education at Avondale
where enhanced online course development is encouraged and innovation is a fostered priority. The resource
has, subsequently, become integral to the support of online educators. Findings from this continuing study are
offered for interpretation and possible application by academic development staff, course designers and teachers
engaged in developing their institution's online education capacity.
References
Ashton, J., & Newman, L. (2006). An unfinished symphony: 21st century teacher education using knowledge
creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 825-840.
Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: critical analysis of the
literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439.
Bell, A., & Morris, G. (2009). Engaging professional learning in online environments. Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology (AJET), 25(5), 700-713.
Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined
learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 56-71.
Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education.
Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 11(1), 71-82.
Gosselin, K. P., & Northcote, M. (2013). Cross-continental research collaborations about online teaching. In D.
G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler & P. Isaias (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International
Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA) (pp. 282-289). Fort Worth,
Texas.
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development. Phi Delta Kappan
International, 90(7), 495-500.
Hacifazlioglu, O., Sacli, O. A., & Yengin, I. (2007). Lecturers’ attitudes towards the use of technology:
Alternative strategies for faculty administrators. Paper presented at the 7th International Educational
Technology Conference, North Cyprus.
Hase, S. (2009). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: Some challenges and opportunities. Impact:
Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-learning(1), 1.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2003, 25-27 September). Heutagogy and developing capable people and capable
workplaces: Strategies for dealing with complexity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Changing
Face of Work and Learning Conference, Alberta, Canada.
Northcote, M., Reynaud, D., Beamish, P., Martin, T., & Gosselin, K. P. (2011). Bumpy moments and joyful
breakthroughs: The place of threshold concepts in academic staff development programs about online
learning and teaching. ACCESS: Critical Perspectives on Communication, Cultural & Policy Studies, 30(2),
75-90.
Patton, M. Q. (2011). Essentials of utilization focused evaluation. London: Sage Publications.
Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-Baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher
education teachers’ beliefs and intentions toward learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 29, 122-131.
738
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning (2nd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Symes, A. (2005). Towards a framework for quality promotion and capacity development in South African
higher education. A report for the QPCD Framework. Pretoria, South Africa: The Council on Higher
Education
Ward, C. L., & Kushner Benson, S. N. (2010). Developing new schemas for online teaching and learning:
TPACK. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 482-490.
Contact authors:
Maria Northcote: maria.northcote@avondale.edu.au; Chris Boddey: chris.boddey@avondale.edu.au
Please cite as: Northcote, M., & Boddey, C. (2014). Using the self-determined learning principles of heutagogy
to support academic staff who are learning to teach online. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S.-K. Loke (Eds.),
Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational technology. Proceedings ascilite Dunedin 2014 (pp.
735-739).
Note: All published papers are refereed, having undergone a double-blind peer-review process.
The author(s) assign a Creative Commons by attribution 3.0 licence enabling others to
distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon their work, even commercially, as long as credit is
given to the author(s) for the original creation.
739