This document contains an evaluation report for a faculty presentation given by Anand S Bankad. It evaluates both the physical and virtual presentation.
For the physical presentation, it provides scores in various categories such as dressing, communication skills, subject knowledge, use of board, diagrams, and time management. The total score is 50.
For the virtual presentation via a link, it provides scores for link connectivity, control and clarity, subject knowledge delivery, recapping, and time management. The total score is 33.
It also includes self-review comments from the faculty and spaces for remarks from the Head of Department, Dean of Academics, and Principal.
This document contains an evaluation report for a faculty presentation given by Anand S Bankad. It evaluates both the physical and virtual presentation.
For the physical presentation, it provides scores in various categories such as dressing, communication skills, subject knowledge, use of board, diagrams, and time management. The total score is 50.
For the virtual presentation via a link, it provides scores for link connectivity, control and clarity, subject knowledge delivery, recapping, and time management. The total score is 33.
It also includes self-review comments from the faculty and spaces for remarks from the Head of Department, Dean of Academics, and Principal.
This document contains an evaluation report for a faculty presentation given by Anand S Bankad. It evaluates both the physical and virtual presentation.
For the physical presentation, it provides scores in various categories such as dressing, communication skills, subject knowledge, use of board, diagrams, and time management. The total score is 50.
For the virtual presentation via a link, it provides scores for link connectivity, control and clarity, subject knowledge delivery, recapping, and time management. The total score is 33.
It also includes self-review comments from the faculty and spaces for remarks from the Head of Department, Dean of Academics, and Principal.
This document contains an evaluation report for a faculty presentation given by Anand S Bankad. It evaluates both the physical and virtual presentation.
For the physical presentation, it provides scores in various categories such as dressing, communication skills, subject knowledge, use of board, diagrams, and time management. The total score is 50.
For the virtual presentation via a link, it provides scores for link connectivity, control and clarity, subject knowledge delivery, recapping, and time management. The total score is 33.
It also includes self-review comments from the faculty and spaces for remarks from the Head of Department, Dean of Academics, and Principal.
Shivabasavanagar, Belagavi- 590 010, Karnataka- India Office: 0831-2407172, 2554559 Fax: 0831-2407152 Website: www.sgbit.edu.in Department of Civil Engineering Form No: SGBIT/ACA/12 Email: hod-civil@sgbit.edu.in Department Extension:531,532,533 Revision:R0, wef:04.10.2019
Physical Presentation
Writing Time Total
Communi Subject Practical Use of and Recap/ Manage (60) Faculty Dressing Style cation Knowledge Application Board Diagrams Review( ment Names (05) (03) (05) (10) (12) (07) (08) 05) (05)
Virtual Presentation Total (40) Time Faculty Link/Connectivity Control and Subject Effective Recap/Review Management Names (03) Clarity(05) Knowledge(10) Delivery(12) (05) (05) S. S. Education Trust’s CET Code: E-175 (UG)/T-942 (PG)
S. G. BALEKUNDRI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Shivabasavanagar, Belagavi- 590 010, Karnataka- India Office: 0831-2407172, 2554559 Fax: 0831-2407152 Website: www.sgbit.edu.in Department of Civil Engineering Form No: SGBIT/ACA/12 Email: hod-civil@sgbit.edu.in Department Extension:531,532,533 Revision:R0, wef:04.10.2019
FACULTY PRESENTATION EVALUATION REPORT
FACULTY NAME: ANAND S BANKAD
PRESENTATION TOPIC: ASSUMPTIONS IN LIMIT STATE METHOD OF DESIGN DATE OF PRESENATION: 16/10/2020 TIME OF PHYSICAL PRESENTATION: 2:30 pm TIME OF VIRTUAL PRESENTATION: 4:30 pm
Physical Presentation Subject Writing Time Commun Practical Use of Recap/ Faculty Dressin Style Knowledg and Manage Total ication Application Board Review Names g (05) (03) e Diagrams( ment (60) (05) (12) (07) (05) (10) 08) (05) Anand S 05 03 04 08 10 06 06 04 04 50 Bankad
Virtual Presentation Faculty Link/Connectivit Control and Subject Effective Recap/Re Time Total Names y (03) Clarity(05) Knowledge(10) Delivery(12) view(05) Management(05) (40)
Anand S 03 05 08 10 03 04 33 Bankad
SELF REVIEW COMMENTS
(I have reviewed my own Lecture video & mentioned below comments) PHYSICAL PRESENTATION VIRTUAL PRESENTATION Neatness in usage of board and hand writing Animation and writing pad should be need to be improved used in PPT
