[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views8 pages

G G G G Az G: Line Integrals Independent of Path

The document discusses several key concepts regarding line integrals and analytic functions: 1) It defines a simply connected domain and proves that line integrals are independent of path if the integrand f is analytic or if the integral equals zero over all closed curves in the domain. 2) It shows that if a line integral is independent of path, the indefinite integral F(z) is differentiable and F'(z) equals f(z). 3) Morera's Theorem states that if a function f is continuous on a simply connected domain and its line integrals equal zero over all closed curves, then f is analytic.

Uploaded by

ab4aziz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views8 pages

G G G G Az G: Line Integrals Independent of Path

The document discusses several key concepts regarding line integrals and analytic functions: 1) It defines a simply connected domain and proves that line integrals are independent of path if the integrand f is analytic or if the integral equals zero over all closed curves in the domain. 2) It shows that if a line integral is independent of path, the indefinite integral F(z) is differentiable and F'(z) equals f(z). 3) Morera's Theorem states that if a function f is continuous on a simply connected domain and its line integrals equal zero over all closed curves, then f is analytic.

Uploaded by

ab4aziz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

21

Lecture 9

Line Integrals Independent of Path

Definition (Simply Connected Domain): A domain G is called
simply connected if every simple closed curve in G encloses only
points of G (i.e. the domain G has no holes).

Let G be a simply connected domain and the points a , z  G . Let
the function f be continuous on G. The indefinite integral
z
 f ( w) dw is called independent of path if the value of the
a
integral is the same for all simple piecewise differentiable curves
C lying in G and joining the points a and z.

It is easily seen that an indefinite integral is independent of
path, if

(i) f is analytic in G
or
(ii)  f ( w)dw = 0 for every closed piece‐wise differentiable
C
curve C lying in G .


Note that (i)  (ii) so it is sufficient to prove that indefinite
integrals are independent of path by using (ii). This can be
done as follows by using the definition of integration:

22


Let C1 , C2 be any two piecewise differentiable curves joining a
and z .

Consider the curve C  C1U ( C2 ) . Since C is a closed curve

 f ( w)dw  0   f ( w)dw    f ( w)dw   f ( w)dw
C C1  C2 C2
z
thus the integral  f ( w) dw is independent of path).
a

z
Note: An indefinite integral  f ( w) dw defines a function F(z)
a
z z
by F(z) =  f ( w) dw only if  f ( w) dw is independent of path.
a a
23

z
Proposition. Let  f ( w) dw be independent of path, f is
a
continuous in a simply connected domain G containing the
z
points a and z and F ( z )   f ( w) dw . Then, F ( z ) is
a
differentiable and F ( z )  f ( z ) for all z  G .

Proof. We have
z z
F ( z  z )  F ( z )   f ( w) dw
z
Choose the path of integration from z to z to be a straight
line segment (this is possible, since, by assumption, the value of
integral is same along every path joining z and z )

F ( z  z )  F ( z ) 1 z z 1 z z
  f ( z)   f ( w) dw   f ( z ) dw
z z z z z
1 z z
   f ( w)  f ( z )  dw . (*)
z z

Now, f is continuous at z
 for   0,   0, s.t. f ( w)  f ( z )   whenever w  z   .

Therefore, (*) gives,

F ( z  z )  F ( z ) 1
 f ( z)  . . z   , whenever z   .
z z
 F ( z )  f ( z ) .
24

Proposition (Morera’s Theorem, Converse of Cauchy


Theorem):
If f is continuous in a simply connected domain G and
 f ( w) dw = 0, for every closed curve C in G, then f is analytic in G.
C

Proof. By the hypothesis of Morera’s Theorem,
z
F ( z )   f ( w) dw , a , z  G , is independent of path.
a
The previous proposition  F ( z )  f ( z ) exists for every
z  G .

 F is analytic, so has derivatives of all orders in G (by a
Proposition based on Taylor’s Theorem); in particular, the
second derivative of F in G exists.

 the derivative of f exists in G .

 f is analytic in G

25

Zeros of Analytic Functions



The point ‘ a ’ is called a zero of order m of a function f(z),
analytic at the point a , if

f ( a )  f ( a )  ...  f ( m 1) ( a )  0 but f m ( a )  0 .

If the function f(z) has a zero of order m at the point a , then


 
f ( z )   bn ( z  a )  ( z  a ) g ( z ), where g ( z )   bn ( z  a )n m
n m
n m n m
.
f ( m ) (a )
Since, g ( a )  bm  , it follows that g ( a )  0 .
m!



26

Isolated Zeros Theorem. The zeros of functions analytic in a


domain D are isolated unless the function is identically zero.

(A zero ‘a’ of function f is called isolated if a disk centered at ‘a’
can be found which does not contain any other zero of f )

27

Proof: Let f ( z ) be analytic in a domain D and a  D be such


that f ( a )  0 . Consider the Taylor series expansion

 bn ( z  a ) of f ( z ) convergent in a disk {z : z  a  R}  D .
n
n 0

Let b j  0 for 1  j  k  1 and bk  0 . Then,

f ( z )  ( z  a )  bn  k ( z  a )n  ( z  a )k g ( z )
k
( say )
n 0

Since,  bn  k ( z  a )n has same radius of convergence as
n 0

 bn ( z  a ) , the function g ( z ) represented by it is analytic,
n
n 0
hence is continuous, in z  a  R .

The continuity of g(z) at a and g ( a )  bk  0  there exists a
|b |
  0 such that | g ( z )  bk | k for all z in z  a   .
2

 g ( z )  0 for all z in z  a   .

Let  *  min( , R ) . Then g ( z )  0 in the disk z  a   *
contained in D .

Consequently, f ( z )  0 in the disk z  a   * , except at a  0 .
Thus, the zero a of f ( z ) is isolated.
28

Corollary 1: If f and g are analytic in a domain D and


 a sequence {zn }with a limit point in D, such that
f ( zn )  g ( zn ) for all n, then f ( z )  g ( z ) in D.

Proof: Apply the above theorem for the function
 ( z )  f ( z )  g ( z ) .

Corollary 2: If f and g are analytic in a domain D and
f ( )  g ( ) for all the points lying on some curve in D, then
f ( z )  g ( z ) in D.

You might also like