[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views3 pages

Gauss's Divergence Theorem: NPTEL - Physics - Mathematical Physics - 1

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 3

NPTEL – Physics – Mathematical Physics - 1

Lecture 5
Gauss’s divergence theorem

Let V be a closed bounded region in space whose boundary is S. Let 𝐴⃗(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧) is a vector that is
continuous and has a continuous first partial derivatives in V, then

0 0
⃗⃗. ⃗⃗⃗⃗⃗
∫𝑆 𝐴⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫𝑉 (∇ 𝐴) 𝑑𝑣 where 𝑛̂ is an outward drawn normal to the elemental surface ds.

Proof of the divergence theorem

Imagine a volume v is split up into a number if parallelepipeds. For each


parallelepiped,
∑ 𝐴⃗ . 𝑑𝑆⃗ =∇
⃗⃗. 𝐴⃗ 𝑑𝑣

(Refer to the physical interpretation of divergence where 𝑣⃗ is replaced by


𝐴⃗ )

Now 𝐴⃗. 𝑑𝑠⃗ terms cancel pair wise for all interior surfaces. Only contribution from the interior faces
survive. When we sum over all the contribution from the tiny parallelepipeds,

∑𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝐴⃗ . 𝑑𝑠⃗ = ∑𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 ∇


⃗⃗. 𝑣⃗ 𝑑𝑣

0 0
Thus ∫𝑆 𝐴⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫𝑣 ⃗∇⃗. 𝐴⃗ 𝑑𝑣

Example

Verify the divergence theorem for 𝐹⃗ = 𝑥 2 x̂ + 𝑦 2 ŷ + 𝑧 2 ẑ over a unit cube (0 ≤ 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 ≤ 1)

Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 23 of 32


NPTEL – Physics – Mathematical Physics - 1

⃗∇⃗. ⃗⃗⃗⃗
𝐹 = 2(𝑥 + 𝑦 + 𝑧)

0
∫𝑣 ∇⃗⃗. 𝐹⃗ 𝑑𝑣 = 2(𝑥 + 𝑦 + 𝑧)𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑧 = 3

Now there are six faces of the cube

0 0 0 0
∫ 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫𝑠 (𝑥=0) 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 + ∫𝑠 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 + ∫𝑠 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 + ∫𝑠 ⃗⃗⃗⃗
𝐹. n̂ 𝑑𝑠 +
1 2(𝑥=1) 3(𝑦=0) 4(𝑦=1)
0 0
∫𝑠 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 + ∫𝑠 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠
5(𝑧=0) 6(𝑧=1)

0 1 1
For 𝑠1 , n̂ = − x̂ , So ∫𝑠 𝐹⃗ . n̂ 𝑑𝑠 = ∫𝑦=0 0 ∫𝑧=0 −𝑥 2 𝑑𝑠 = 0 .
1

0
For 𝑠2 n̂ = x̂ ∫𝑠 𝐹⃗ . ̂𝑛 𝑑𝑠 = 1
2

Only 𝑠4 and 𝑠6 are the other surfaces contribution. Total =3.

Example of divergence Theorem in Physics

The applicability of the concept of divergence can be explained through the celebrated Gauss’s
law of electrostatics. Consider the electric field due to a point charge. The field lines move out radially in
1
all directions and according to Coulomb’s law, the field intensity E, falls off with the distance r as 𝑟2
.
Now if the aim is to calculate the flux of this field through a given surface that encloses the charge. It is
0
easy to argue that the surface integral ∫ 𝐸⃗ . 𝑑𝑠 will be a constant which is independent of the distance at
𝑠
which the surface is located from the point charge, as the surface grows as 𝑟 2 with field going down as
1
, making the above surface integral independent of r. according to Gauss’s law of electrostatics,
r2

0 𝑞
∫𝑠 𝐸⃗ . 𝑑𝑠 = 𝜀 where 𝜀0 is the permittivity of the medium.
0

Applying the divergence theorem,

0
0
𝑞
∫ 𝐸⃗ . 𝑑𝑠 = ∫(∇
⃗⃗. 𝐸⃗⃗ )𝑑𝑣 =
𝑠 𝜀0
𝑣

Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 24 of 32


NPTEL – Physics – Mathematical Physics - 1

Instead of a point charge, the above equation will hold for a given uniform volume charge density, 𝜌
which is given by,

0
∫𝑣 𝜌𝑑𝑣 = 𝑞𝑒𝑛𝑐 where the volume v is enclosed by the surface s.

And the above form of Gauss’s law of electrostatics law takes,

0
⃗⃗. 𝐸⃗⃗ )𝑑𝑣 = 𝑞𝑒𝑛𝑐 = 1 ∫0 𝜌𝑑𝑣
∫𝑣 (∇ 𝜀 𝜀 𝑣
0 0

0 𝜌
⃗⃗. 𝐸⃗⃗ −
Thus ∫𝑣 (∇ )𝑑𝑣 = 0
𝜀0

For an arbitrary volume,

𝜌
⃗⃗. 𝐸⃗⃗ −
∇ =0
𝜀0

𝜌
Hence ⃗∇⃗. 𝐸
⃗⃗ =
𝜀0

1 𝜌
Thus the divergence of the electric field is nonzero (as it should be as E diverges as 𝑟2 )and is given by 𝜀0
.
The above relation is also known as one of the Maxwell’s equations in Electrodynamics.

Joint initiative of IITs and IISc – Funded by MHRD Page 25 of 32

You might also like