Music Reference Services Quarterly
Music Reference Services Quarterly
To cite this article: Rachel E. Scott (2014) HIP Librarians: An Introduction to Historically Informed
Performance for Music Librarians, Music Reference Services Quarterly, 17:3, 125-141, DOI:
10.1080/10588167.2014.935587
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis,
our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to
the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions
and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors,
and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content
should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources
of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims,
proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or
howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising
out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any
substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing,
systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms &
Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-
and-conditions
Music Reference Services Quarterly, 17:125–141, 2014
Published with license by Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1058-8167 print/1540-9503 online
DOI: 10.1080/10588167.2014.935587
RACHEL E. SCOTT
Ned R. McWherter Library, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
© Rachel E. Scott
Received: 3 February 2014; Revised: 5 May 2014; Accepted: 2 June 2014.
Address correspondence to Rachel E. Scott, 126 Ned R. McWherter Library, University of
Memphis, TN 38152, USA. E-mail: rescott3@memphis.edu
125
126 Rachel E. Scott
While most performers of his time were content to play Bach using a mod-
ern instrument at contemporary concert pitch or to interpolate a cadenza
by a modern performer into a Mozart concerto, Joachim’s statement shows
that consideration of the composer’s expectations with regard to sound and
expression had entered the mainstream performer’s consciousness by the
beginning of the twentieth century.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
very different origin, content, quality and purpose.”5 These processes reflect
five of the six information literacy competencies advocated by the ACRL:
“Determine the extent of information needed, access the needed informa-
tion effectively and efficiently, evaluate information and its sources critically,
incorporate selected information into one’s knowledge base, use information
effectively to accomplish a specific purpose.”6 The overlap of these com-
petencies creates an excellent opportunity for the music librarian to help
students apply their critical-thinking skills in an area of utmost importance
to musicians: performance.
In order for music librarians to facilitate historically informed per-
formance, they must be familiar with the relevant sources, both within
and outside of their collections. Due to the interdisciplinary nature of
this research, music librarians may also need to explore sources out-
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
SCORES
Scores are the primary source material for musical research; however, they do
not necessarily answer all of the performer’s questions about a piece. Despite
all of the notation on the page, musical scores remain open to interpre-
tation. Composers cannot—and do not necessarily want to—indicate every
nuance of tempo, dynamics, phrasing, attack, affect, or tone color. Notions
of performer’s responsibility vary widely from one composer to another.
Many composers wrote something different than what they expected to hear;
certain conventions and stylistic elements either could not be or were not
notated, and are accordingly challenging to recreate. This means that even
under the watchful eye of the composer, a piece will sound different from
one performance to another.
François Couperin commented on the ambiguity of musical notation in
L’Art de toucher le clavecin: “There are in my view some deficiencies in the
way we notate music which relate to the manner in which we write our
language. It is that we write something different from what we play. This is
why foreigners play our music less well than we do theirs.”7 Couperin was
likely referring specifically to notes inégales, but there are other examples of
stylized rules and conventions in which composers’ notation did not match
their expectations. Composers often expected performers to ornament, to
realize a figured bass, or to play certain rhythms according to conventions of
the time and place.
128 Rachel E. Scott
others. In the age of the International Music Score Library Project and other
online platforms that offer freely digitized but often error-riddled perfor-
mance editions, this truth must be conveyed to music students by their studio
and classroom teachers, conductors, and librarians. In order to articulate why
and how certain scores differ, the music librarian must be aware of the var-
ious formats in which musical scores can be found—including manuscript,
scholarly or critical editions, performance editions, and anthologies—and the
strengths and purposes of each.
Musical manuscripts present a rich source of information about the
expectations of the composer, early performances, and performance practice.
Musical manuscripts may be autographs (in the hand of the composer) or
copies (in the hand of a known or unknown copyist). They may present the
whole work or fragments, the completed work, or sketches/drafts. They may
represent a specific performance (performance score) or no performance at
all (for example, presentation scores).
Autograph manuscripts provide the most direct link to the composer;
they allow viewers to see nuances in notation that are scrubbed away in
the publication process. A crossed-out repeat sign in the autograph of the
first movement of Mozart’s Symphony in D Major, K. 385 shows that the
composer considered, but decided against, a repeat; the difference in ink
color confirms that he added flutes and clarinets at a different time than
the other instruments. While some of the insight is purely musical, as in
the Mozart examples above, some is related to the character or personality
of the composer. Stanley Boorman’s entry on manuscript sources in Grove
Music Online highlights the latter: “We feel that we can detect something of
Beethoven’s personality in the barely legible scrawl with which he covered
the pages of his drafts, even coming to see the power of the inspirational
force that drove him.”8
While it may be tempting to conflate an autograph source with the one
authentic or true expression of a piece (Werktreue), doing so is dangerous.
Several composers revised pieces repeatedly throughout their lives,9 leaving
Historically Informed Performance for Music Librarians 129
late nineteenth century, the pianist and conductor Hans von Bülow edited
many of Beethoven’s piano sonatas. His editorial contributions include
highly nuanced dynamics and phrasing, several idiosyncratic fingerings,
and paragraph-long footnotes of explanations and instructions. Von Bülow’s
effort differs substantially from music theorist Heinrich Schenker’s consid-
erably cleaner edition of the same pieces for Universal in 1918. Older
performance editions often include historical information about perfor-
mances, performers, and publication. This information may or may not be
useful, depending on the needs of the performer. Regardless of the purported
authenticity or uniqueness of the score in hand, it must be contextualized
with information specific to the piece’s performance history, any extant nar-
rative accounts pertaining to the piece, and a general knowledge of the
aesthetics and techniques of the time.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
TREATISES
NARRATIVE ACCOUNTS
HISTORICAL/ARCHIVAL RECORDS
ICONOGRAPHY
likely be discounted, but the depiction of the instrument itself might bear
some resemblance to those used in the time and place in which the paint-
ing was made. Although photographs can be edited, they are nonetheless
more objective and more readily accepted as historical record. Their obvi-
ous limitation is that cameras were not widely available until the mid- to
late nineteenth century. Architectural plans and drawings from patents, trea-
tises, or other scientific materials are also more easily accepted as factual.
Most other existing image types were created as artistic works, not to record
aspects of musical history.
Finding relevant images can prove challenging. To browse the local col-
lection for books with numerous depictions of music or musical images, one
should search the subject “music in art” or “musical instruments in art.” The
Library of Congress’s Dayton C. Miller Musical Iconography Collection24 is
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
ORGANOLOGY
The instrument that might have been used to debut a piece of music is
another valid point of investigation for historically informed performance.
According to Grove Music Online, organology is “the study of musical instru-
ments in terms of their history and social function, design, construction and
relation to performance.”27 The differences in timbre, volume, technique,
materials, and sound between modern instruments and their predecessors
can be staggering. Stephen Davies contends that period instruments should
sound better than modern ones in the works written for them: “They make
clearer or more salient features of the work that are aesthetically signifi-
cant.”28 The idiomatic features of period instruments may or may not be
replicated on modern instruments, but should, at the very least, be inves-
tigated and understood by the performer. The Baroque harpsichord, for
example, is a completely different instrument than the modern piano. When
playing a Baroque keyboard piece on a modern instrument, the performer
Historically Informed Performance for Music Librarians 135
sources, including Grove Music Online and The New Grove Dictionary of
Music, also include period- and composer-specific information for several
instruments.
EARLY RECORDINGS
many institutions are not willing to loan sound recordings, and many early
recordings may be on formats that one’s library has no means of play-
ing. This problem has been addressed in part by the availability of many
early sound recordings online. A variety of commercial platforms, such as
YouTube, and institutional repositories, such as the Cylinder Preservation
and Digitization Project at the University of California at Santa Barbara
Libraries,33 provide an excellent selection of early twentieth-century record-
ings. The sound quality of these recordings is often very bad and can
detract from the appreciation of the musical content. These limitations to
access add another layer of difficulty to a source that is already fraught with
controversy.
APPLICATION
CONCLUSION
NOTES
1. Joseph Joachim and Andreas Moser, Violinschule, vol. 3 (Berlin: Simrock, 1905), 5. “Um seiner
Aufgabe vollkommen gerecht zu werden, wird sich der Darstellende zunächst über die näheren Umstände
unterrichten müssen, unter denen die Komposition, die er vortragen will, entstanden ist. Denn ein Werk
von Bach oder Tartini erheischt eine andere Vortragsweise als eines von Mendelssohn oder Spohr. Der
Zeitraum von rund hundert Jahren, der die beiden Autorenpaare voneinander trennt, bedeutet für die
geschichtliche Entwicklung unserer Kunst nicht nur einen großen Unterschied in formaler Hinsicht,
sondern einen weit größeren noch nach der Seite des musikalischen Ausdrucks hin.”
2. Arnold Dolmetsch, The Interpretation of the Music of the XVIIth and XVIIIth Centuries Revealed
by Contemporary Evidence (London: Novello and Co, 1915), 471.
3. Howard Mayer Brown, “Performing Practice,” in The New Grove Encyclopedia of Music and
Musicians, edited by Stanley Sadie, v. 14 (London: Macmillan Publishers, 1980), 388.
4. For an in-depth history of this topic, readers should consult Harry Haskell’s The Early Music
Revival (London: Thames and Hudson, 1988).
5. Colin Lawson and Robin Stowell, The Historical Performance of Music: An Introduction
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
24. “Dayton C. Miller Musical Iconography Collection,” Library of Congress, accessed November 1,
2013, http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/ihas/html/miller/miller-home.html.
25. “Bildarchiv und Grafiksammlung,” Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, accessed November 1,
2013, http://www.onb.ac.at/sammlungen/bildarchiv.htm.
26. Robert Palmieri and Margaret W. Palmieri, Piano: An Encyclopedia (New York: Routledge,
2003).
27. Laurence Libin, “Organology,” Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. Oxford University
Press, accessed November 1, 2013, http://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/subscriber/article/grove/music/
20441.
28. Stephen Davies, Musical Works and Performances: A Philosophical Exploration (Oxford, UK:
Clarendon Press, 2001), 218.
29. Peter Walls, “Historical Performance and the Modern Performer,” in Musical Performance: A
Guide to Understanding, edited by John Rink (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 24.
30. Samuel Barber, Leontyne Price & Samuel Barber Historic Performances (1938, 1953) (New
Rochelle, NY: Bridge, CD, 2004).
31. Patti recorded this and other arias between 1903 and 1907. The Complete Adelina Patti and
Victor Maurel (Swarthmore, PA: Marston, CD, 1998).
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
32. Enrico Caruso, Caruso, Prima voce (Charlottesville, VA: Nimbus, CD, 1989).
33. “Cylinder Preservation and Digitization Project,” UC Santa Barbara Library, http://cylinders.
library.ucsb.edu/ (accessed November 1, 2013).
34. Kirstin Dougan, “Delivering and Assessing Music Reference Services,” The Reference Librarian
54, no. 1 (2013): 41.
Choose a piece you are currently working on (composed between 1600 and
1900).
1. Look up the composer and work in Grove Music Online or New Grove
Dictionary of Music and Musicians. Record information specific to your
piece (date composed, original key, original scoring, extant alternate ver-
sions, catalog number, library holding manuscript, references) and the
complete editions and thematic catalogs available for your composer (at top
of works list).
A description of Mozart’s Exultate Jubilate, for example, would include the
following:
K165/K158a, in F major, scored for sop, 2 ob, 2 hn, str, bc; composed in
Milan, Jan 1773 (date from MS of work, not always clear), in Mozarts Werke
III/ii, 43; in Neue Mozart Ausgabe I:3, 157; motet, for V. Rauzzini; first per-
formed in Milan, 17 Jan 1773; rev. version with 2 fl instead of 2 oboes and
text changes, Salzburg, about 1780.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
2a. Look up the composer’s collected work(s) and thematic catalog. Write
the call numbers in the blank below and pull them from the shelves.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
140 Rachel E. Scott
2b. Search the library catalog for manuscripts of your piece. If available, write
down the call number and view it. HINT: Search manuscripts as a subject
and your composer or piece title.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
2c. If unavailable, search RISM (Music Manuscripts after 1600) for
manuscripts of your piece. Note the key signature, scoring, date, and library
below. Any differences from the Grove entry?
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
3a. Read the editor’s notes in the critical edition. List the sources (autograph,
copy, other manuscripts) consulted and/or omitted to prepare your piece.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
7a. What information can you find about the first performer or ensemble?
List sources consulted.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
7b. Search WorldCat for recordings of the first performer. If available, list a
few:
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
8. Write down the date and venue of the debut performance. List any venue
specific information (seating capacity/arrangement, stage height/shape, tech-
nical and acoustical information, sales and administration information)
around the time of the debut of your piece.
Downloaded by [New York University] at 00:47 09 October 2014
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
9. How does your modern instrument differ from the instrument used to
debut this piece? List three differences. Singers should list three differences
in execution and aesthetics.
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________