COVID-19 Treatment Idea: Ultra-Executive Summary
COVID-19 Treatment Idea: Ultra-Executive Summary
COVID-19 Treatment Idea: Ultra-Executive Summary
Ultra-Executive Summary
Hypothesis: Substantially increasing protein intake could work as a treatment for COVID-19. More
sophisticated variations on this idea could also work. If true, this would provide a cheap and “already-
deployed” remedy for COVID-19.
1
• Binding for SARS-CoV-1 is known to take place on the “outside” of ACE2,1 which may leave the ACE2
catalytic active side una ected. It is presumed that SARS-CoV-2 does as well.
• Upon substrate/inhibitor binding to ACE2 at the catalytic active site, ACE2 undergoes a “substantial”
conformational change (“clamshell” 16° hinge-bending of the two sides of the active site cleft).3
– Pantoliano and coworkers speculate in the last paragraph of their report3 that this conformational
change may be enough to provide protection from SARS binding.
∗ No prior precedent is cited in this report to support this speculation.
∗ None of the papers from 2020 which cite this report make mention of this speculative possi-
bility for a “protected conformation.”
• Many of the small-molecule drugs known to be under exploration4 share a particular motif: an amide-
like nitrogen connected to a chain of four atoms that then splits into two branches on the fth chain
atom (Figure 1).
– Chloroquine is a conveniently simple representation.
– At least one of the two branches is “short” (e.g., methyl or ethyl).
– This substructure seems as though it would be appropriate for some degree of binding the ACE2
cataltyic active site.
∗ The crude superimposition of chloroquine over a depiction of the ACE2-bound inhibitor from
the Pantoliano report3 roughly illustrates how this might happen (Figure 2).
∗ Particularly relevant is the “S1 subsite” of ACE2 described by Pantoliano and coworkers, which
contains a small pocket under the “Tyr510 lid.”3
· Importantly, this pocket is most suitable for substrates like angiotensin II, but is less
e ective for angiotensin I due to the presence of the bulkier His residue at the P1 position
in angiotensin II.3 This suggests that angiotensin I might act as a quasi-inhibitor for ACE2
in context of inducing the “protected conformation.”
• Thus, might it be possible to attempt to treat COVID-19 through the use of simple peptides?
– One example of a peptide known to be hydrolyzed by ACE2 is β-casomorphin,5 so a derivative of
milk might help.
– However, in order to decrease clearance burden and the risk of side e ects, it might be best to
use speci c di-/triipeptides.
∗ Based on the way that angiotensin I has good binding to ACE2 but is hydrolyzed with a
catalytic e ciency orders of magnitude lower than angiotensin II, it seems as though peptides
with His as the second to last amino acid (C-terminus end) might be especially e ective.
∗ It may be possible to use combinations of di erent peptides to create an “extended release”
e ect (i.e., di erent amino acid sequences and di erent peptide lengths).
– It may be possible that rate of protein digestion would be enough to provide an extended release.
– Delivery methods other than simple digesion (e.g., intravenous) may also be viable.
• If true, the role of diet in COVID-19 vulnerability might be much greater than currently assumed.
2
Figure 1: Selection of drug molecules currently being explored for COVID-19 treatment; relevant submotifs are high-
lighted.
Figure 2: Crude superimposition of chloroquine and angiotensin II over an ACE2-bound inhibitor (partly adapted from
Pantoliano and coworkers3 ).
3
References
(1) Wu, K.; Peng, G.; Wilken, M.; Geraghty, R. J.; Li, F. Mechanisms of Host Receptor Adaptation by
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287 (12), 8904–8911. https:
//doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.325803.
(2) Ho mann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T. S.;
Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2
and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 0 (0), ASAP. https://doi.org/10
.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052.
(3) Towler, P.; Staker, B.; Prasad, S. G.; Menon, S.; Tang, J.; Parsons, T.; Ryan, D.; Fisher, M.; Williams,
D.; Dales, N. A.; et al. ACE2 X-Ray Structures Reveal a Large Hinge-Bending Motion Important for
Inhibitor Binding and Catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279 (17), 17996–18007. https://doi.org/10.107
4/jbc.M311191200.
(5) Jiang, F.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, M.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, F. F.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, C.
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 and Angiotensin 1–7: Novel Therapeutic Targets. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.
2014, 11 (7, 7), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.59.