Dlight
Dlight
Dlight
2
Background and Case Facts
Synopsis
Sam Goldman founded d.light Design in New Delhi, India in December 2009. According
to Ned Tozun, “Our mission is to eradicate the use of kerosene” – rooted from a Stanford
Graduate School of Business course Design for Extreme Affordability. The course was inspired
by Dr. Paul Polak’s concept of using modern product design and development techniques into an
emerging market context. As such, Tozun and Goldman founded d.light with the vision of being
a for-profit social enterprise, with success measured both through profits and through lives
positively affected.
Case Facts
Since 70% of Indian Citizens still lived in Rural Areas, majority still use kerosene which
can be prone to accidents. (Urban Vs. Rural Geographies)
The majority of Indians in rural areas earned their livings through agricultural work
therefore having below income level. Consequently, it follows that majority of rural
households were found to have outstanding debts including local financing organization,
multiple parties, friends and family and local shopkeepers. (Household Income and debt)
Household and businesses that were electrified faced frequent blackouts with many
facing energy losses of fifteen or more hours per day (Electrification in India)
Literacy and media exposure in Rural is low compared to Urban specifically for women
(Literacy and media exposure).
The main problem the d.light founders must address is how to design the best marketing channel
strategy? Should the company employ a single or a multi-channel strategy? Below are key
consideration areas that should be tackled:
1. Create demand for solar lamps
2. Create trust in the brand
3. Achieve affordability and easier access for d.light products
4. Choosing to distribute products to retailers and/or consumers.
3
Objectives
Goldman and Tozun decided that the economic and ethnographic evidence pointed to a clear
latent demand among Indian consumers for reliable, affordable light and power solutions.
In response, d.light would like to set the following objectives aligned with their marketing –
channel strategy:
In addition, the marketing channel strategy should be aligned to the desire of the founders to
manage d.light as a for-profit social enterprise – reconciling money and mission.
1. The team has limited resources, therefore has limitations on adapting all distribution
channel.
2. As stated in the case’s synopsis, it is in the best interest of the founders to reconcile both
money and mission – they must choose the best marketing channel strategy that allows
them to profit while at the same time helping a particular segment. The ideal is to profit
by helping a particular segment solve their social problems.
Achieve affordability and easier Favorable economics for middle to high quintile segments
access for d.light products
4
Objective Areas for Consideration
Prices are still not accessible to the poorest consumers of
rural India – lowest quintile
Choosing to distribute products to
retailers and/or consumers.
SWOT Analysis
Strength of Product:
The advantage of using d. light product compared to kerosene users has been proven to
greatly improve family conditions.
The product has been reported to be dependable especially to unreliable electric
connection.
Weakness of Product:
The lack of education and information access in rural India meant that companies often
had to educate consumers (before initiating sales). Because consumers are not seeking
alternatives to kerosene lamps.
Company product lack brand recognition and trust in rural India would be a significant
barrier to consumer adoption of its products.
Purchasing power of rural household was diminished not only by low incomes but also
by the unpredictability of income streams.
Problem with the distribution and placement of product due to lack of well-developed
transportation & infrastructure on the country.
D. Light was a startup and had limited access to financial capital, therefore it is sensitive
to potential cost on different distribution channels available.
Opportunities:
It can eradicate the use of kerosene in a safe and cost efficient manner
Generate inclined growth and demand for D. light product
Increase marketing channel may possess the possibility to reduce cost
Increase operations efficiency and effectivity if the distribution channel are properly
allocated
Limited access to electricity being solved by the product
Threats
Social culture may have resistance to change
Entrants of future competitors
Literacy and media limitations especially in the rural segment
5
Aversion of consumers in products they do not understand or they do not actively seek
6
Theoretical Frameworks
Given the breadth of scope the case covers, we deem it necessary to apply various frameworks
across different perspectives or areas of consideration.
Osterwalder and Pigneur developed the Value Proposition Design framework, which
visually shows product-market fit between concepts and the needs of customers. The left side
shows the product designed to meet customer needs, while the right side shows observations of
what the customers really need to do, together with the obstacles they face.
7
Marketing Channel Design and Implementation Framework
This framework by Coughlan et al. (2014) provides steps in designing and implementing
marketing channels. From segmenting to deciding the appropriate channel structure, the
framework aims to align marketing channels to the value proposition being offered by the firm.
8
Osterwalder and Pigneur (2010) developed the business model canvas as a tool for
enterprises to visualize how they operate. Basically, the canvas is a snapshot of how the
company creates value and delivers them to target customers, while managing cost structures and
revenue streams. This framework emphasizes the importance of being synchronized across the
‘nine building blocks’ – being able to optimize the proper activities that is congruent with the
enterprise’s desired value proposition.
In the social entrepreneurship field, scholars and practitioners have developed ‘social
business models’ (Yunus et al., 2010). The four component is in line with the business model
canvas, but highlights the social profit equation (social impact) and value constellation (internal
value chain, external value chain integrating social impact).
9
Alternative Courses of Actionfor Different Channels
10
ACA Pros Cons
Shops and Distributors transporting goods in to small demonstration by retail
villages. sales people, an investment
Larger retailers were often well of personnel resources that
known and trusted by retailers might be hesitant
consumers , products sold by to make.
the retailer could also gain a Little incentive to
measure of trust with selld.light products at a
consumers local level – more willing
Haatsas promising concepts to sell more lucrative
petroleum products
11
Analysis and Recommendation
12
Marketing Channel Design and Implementation Framework
Channel Design
Segmentation:
Lowest to middle fifth as the Bottom of the Pyramid, where social profit is most
maximized; reach self-help groups
Middle to highest fifth, where commercial profit can be optimized
Channel structure
Rural entrepreneurs(recruit from the lowest to middle fifth quintile)
Local NGOs and cooperatives
Weekly markets, or haats, where REs can participate as well while still
maintaining control and alignment to the company’s mission
13
Degree of commitment
Alignment of missions with NGOs and cooperatives
Increased income opportunities for rural entrepreneurs
Weekly market haats stimulates products; relatively more affordable channel
versus retailers
Gap Analysis
Commercial proficiency of channels
Channel Implementation
In this case, the three channels have minimal conflict and can collaborate with each other
as they serve
14
Business Model Design
Social impact:
Empowerment of rural entrepreneurs to be self-sufficient
Eco-system of interdependence between NGO, rural entrepreneurs, and customers
Increasing productivity and income of rural worker
15
Summary of Recommendations
The value proposition design shows product-market fit between the target segments and
intended products to be offered. Moreover, this shows how social profit can be maximized by
targeting the lowest to the middle quintiles in the rural areas, while optimizing commercial profit
through the help of the middle to the higher quintiles.
The marketing channels allow better distribution and access to the products. Rural
entrepreneurs will be recruited with emphasis from the lowest to the middle quintile areas to
increase income opportunities for them, while serving as influencers for the whole rural
community to buy the d.light products. NGOs and cooperatives provide education and
financial help in using the products. The weekly haats serve as direct consumer touchpoints,
which rural entrepreneurs can also utilize in distributing their d.light products.
Finally, the business model canvas integrates the whole strategy of d.light, ensuring that
the operations and marketing are synchronized in targeting the 2 segments of rural communities.
Action Plan
16
Objective Areas for Consideration Action Plan
took the product home after
they had paid the full price
Collective purchasing power of
women’s self-help group could
also be target as a potential
revenue source.
Choosing to Alignment to the mission Partner with rural
distribute Access to consumers entrepreneurs, nonprofits, and
products to cooperatives which show
retailers highest alignment with
and/or d.light’s mission yet provides
consumers. access to consumers, while
taking into consideration
important concerns.
In the future, we can use the scaling framework to grow the business in the urban areas:
Adjacent customers –
o Higher margin products, such as the S250, or new product with more premium
positioning
o Employ other marketing channels such as centralized distribution shops and
retailers, leveraging on the brand built and success in the rural areas
17
Coughlan, A. T., Anderson, E., Stern, L. W., & El-Ansary, A. (2014). Marketing
channels (7th ed). Person Education Limited: UK.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing management (14thed.). Prentice Hall, New
Jersey.
Osterwalder, A., &Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation. NJ: John Wiley and
Sons, Inc.
Osterwalder, A., &Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G., & Smith, A. (2014). Value proposition
design. NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Polak, P., & Warwick, M. (2013). The business solution to poverty. Berrett-Koehler
Publishers, Inc: San Francisco, California, USA.
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business
models: Lessons from the grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 308.
Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/288325167?accountid=28547
18