Impact of Economic Reforms On Banking Secrtor VIS - A-VIS - Liberalization
Impact of Economic Reforms On Banking Secrtor VIS - A-VIS - Liberalization
Impact of Economic Reforms On Banking Secrtor VIS - A-VIS - Liberalization
Abstract: The financial system is the back bone of the economy. A well-developed financial system greatly
facilitates economic development leading to increase in national Income and living standards. An organized
financial system is characterized by the existence of integrated developed and regulated financial markets and
institutions that carter to the financial needs of both the house hold sector and corporate and government
sectors. The objective of the study is to generate understanding about the impact of the Indian financial system
after the introduction of liberalization measures in 1990’s which has become more advanced in response to
various needs of the economy. This research paper also aims at examine the effective implementation of Sri. M.
Narasimham committee recommendation on banking sector. This research paper also framed some objectives
to understand the study.
Keywords: Liberalization vis – via impact of financial reforms in Banking sector – Impact of the 1st Phase of
Sri. M. Narasimham Committee on Banking Sector with implementation of Financial Reforms
I. Introduction:
After Independence, India followed the policy of planned growth and for this it pursued conservative
polices. The public sector was given priority and was made the important instrument of growth. The fiscal
policy was framed in such a way that it un obliged resources from the private sector to finance development
programme and public investment in infrastructure. Similarly, the monetary policy sought to regulate financial
flows in accordance with the needs of the Industrial Sector and keep the inflation under control. Foreign Trade
Policy was formulated to protect domestic Industry and keep trade balance in manageable limits. These
conservative policies continued for decades, but it was noticed as early as in 1980’s that there was
Excess of consumption and expenditure over revenue resulting in heavy government borrowings.
Growing inefficiency in the use of resources.
Over protection to Industry.
Mismanagement of firms and economy.
Mounting losses of public sector enterprise.
Various distortions like poor technological development and shortage of foreign exchange and imprudent
borrowings from abroad and mismanagement of foreign exchange reserves.
Overcoming these drawbacks, economic reforms were set in motion though on a modest scale in 1985.
However, measures undertaken were ad-hoc, half-hearted and non-serious. As a result, the sign of crises began
to manifest themselves in 1991. There were
Low Foreign exchange reserves: The available foreign exchange reserves were just sufficient to finance
imports of three weeks.
Burden of National debits: National debits constituted 60% of the GNP in 1991. The large fiscal deficits
in the previous five years meant that the government was borrowing increasingly to meet the short fall of
the revenue account.
Inflation:Gulf war, hike in the administrative prices of money essential commodities and excess liquidity
in the country led to very high rate of inflation in the country. The wholesale prices increased at the annual
average rate of 12 during the year.
The government responded to the crises by introducing economic reforms in the country. Reforms were
introduced in all major sectors of the economy including financial sector also.
Financial Sector: According to the historical back ground of Indian economy reforms were emerging in
financial sector. Financial sector reforms mainly relate to three categories as
Banking Sector reforms
Capital reforms
Insurance sector reforms.
Liberalization leads to privatization and globalization. International standards for capital adequacy,
asset classification are introduced. All these steps are covered under liberalization measures that should be
increase competition.
Limitations of the study: The study based on secondary date only. It is confined only banking sector but not
covered other financial sectors viz Insurance sector, Capital marketing etc. The study covered only a few
recommendations were made by the Sri. M. Narasimham committee in brief.
Methodology of the study: The study is exploratory in nature. The study bas been carried out by using data
from secondary sources collecting through research papers and students reference text books. This study covers
Indian Banking system impacts from Indian Government has opened doors for implementation of economic
reforms in the year 1991 as a mile stone.
1. Branch expansion: Commercial banks penetrated into rural area by opening branches in rural areas and
semi-urban area.
The following table shows the progress of branches expansion
The above table disclosed that the percentage of rural branches and semi-urban branches rose from 22 and 4
percent respectively in 1969 – 1980 and 58 and 18 percent respectively in 1991.
I. Direct Investment:
(a) Statutory liquidity Ratio (SLR): The Banking Regulation Act made a stipulation that all scheduled banks
have to maintain minimum of 25 percent of their net total demand and time liabilities (NDTL) in the form
of cash, gold and approved securities. The Sri. M. Narasimham Committee recommended that the SLR
should be reduced from 38.5 to 25 percent over the next 5 years. The SLR was gradually reduced to 2.5
percent by 22.10.1997 to 24% in Nov – 2008.
(b) Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR): The schedule banks in India had to maintain a minimum or 3 percent of their
total demand and time deposits under RBI Act 1934. The Sri. M. Narasimham committee recommended
that CRR should be progressively reduced to 3 from 5 percent.
Direct Credit Programmes: Banks were directed to lend at least 40 percent of Net banking Credit to
priority sectors agriculture, small Industry, export and Road Transport etc. at concessional rate of interest.
Structure of Interest of Rates: The Interest rates of banks on both deposits and advances were
administrated by RBI. These rates were unrelated to market rate of Interest. The Sri. M. Narasimham
Committee recommended that all regulations of interest rates should be removed. Scheduled banks have
now the freedom to fix their interest rates on deposits subject to minimum floor rates and maximum ceiling
rates.
Prudential Norms: If the balance sheets of banks are to reflect the actual financial health, there has to be
proper recognition of Income, classification of assets and provisioning for bad debts on prudential basis.
Asset Reconstruction Fund: To take over bad debts from commercial banks to arrange Asset
Reconstruction Fund. All bad and doubtful debts were to be transferred to the ARF. The ARF should be
given special recovery powers. The capital of ARF should be subscribed by public sector banks and
financial institutions.
Capital Adequacy: Inadequacy of Capital in the banking system in a cause for concern. The Sri. M.
Narasimhan Committee recommended that the banks should achieve a minimum of 4 percent capital
adequacy ratio in relation to risk weighted assets by March 1993, the capital is not less than 2 percent. The
Basel standard of 8 percent should be achieved by 1996.
Establishment of Private sector banks: The RBI announced guidelines for setting up of private banks as
public limited companies. These Banks should be financially viable. In 1993 banks were permitted to be
established in private sector with a minimum capital of Rs.200 Crores to be increased with in a period of 8
years to 300 Crores.
Branch Licensing:The Sri. M. Narasimham Committee recommended that licensing be abolished. Opening or
closing of branches should be left to the discretion of the individual banks. Banks have also been permitted to
rationalize their existing branches, to open of specialized branches and to convert the existing non-viable rural
branches into satellite offices.
Foreign Banks:The Committee recommended a liberal approach in permitting foreign banks to open either
branches or subsidiary bank. Joint venture between foreign banks and loan banks could also be permitted.
Since 1992, 19 new foreign banks have been allowed.
Debt Recovery Tribunals: The Committee recommended setting up of special Tribunals to speed up the
process of recovery. The Government passed Recovery of Debts & Due to Banks and financial Institutions Act
1993 in August 1993. By 1998 eight debt recovery Tribunals were established covering 20 States and 4 Union
Territories. An Appellate Tribunal was also established in Mumbai.
Supervision over Banks: The Committee recommended that dual control between the RBI and the banking
division of the ministry of Finance over the banking system should end. The RBI should be the primary agency
for regulation.
Name of Conference: International Conference on “Paradigm Shift in Taxation, Accounting, 65 |Page
Finance and Insurance”
Impact of Economic Reforms on Banking Secrtor VIS – A-VIS - Liberalization
III. Conclusion:
Banking sector is one of the most important sectors among all the service sectors in any country.
Banking is a economic barometer to measure the financial performance of the country and the economic growth
and sustainability. The historical back ground of Indian banking system during independence was totally in
private hands. After independence,the then Prime Minister of India Smt. Indira Gandhi nationalized 14 major
private sector banks into public sector banks. In the year 1980’s 6 more banks were nationalized. Since then
many changes have been taking place. From the year 1190’s Indian economy has been running with progressive
growth in all core sectors due to the implementation of economic reforms. The impact of the liberalization
policies converging in Indian banking sectors is forwarding with a tremendous growth rate, with the
implementations of Sri. M. Narasimham committee’s recommendations many changes are taking place. The
committee set new and higher norms of capital adequacy. The committee also recommended that assessment of
the quality of assets non-performing assets, prudential norms and disclosure of the requirements.
References:
[1]. Kalpana Deb, Indian banking since Independence.(1988)
[2]. Narasimham . M, “Report of the Committee on the Financial System”, RBI, 1991.
[3]. Toor. N.S, “Non-Performing Advances in Banks” – Concept, Practice and Management”, Skylark Publications, New Delhi, 1994.
[4]. RajagopalaNair, Rural Bank Marketing in Kerala, Doctoral Thesis, University of kerala(1994)
[5]. Uppal. R.K(2009)., “Customer Service in India Commercial Banks: An Empirical Study, Asia-Pacific journal of Social Sciences,
Jan-June 2009, pp 127-141.
[6]. A.V. Ranganatha Chari, Rudra Sai Baba, K. Anjaneyulu, “The financial services Banking and Insurance – Kalyani Publishers PP.
No.7.5-7.10