This document provides design criteria and calculations for a caisson foundation and flagpole footing based on building codes. It includes input parameters, analysis, and checks for:
1) A caisson designed to transfer vertical and lateral loads into bedrock or suitable soil below unsatisfactory soil/water. Calculations check soil bearing capacity and caisson embedment length.
2) A flagpole footing designed to resist lateral loads from the pole. Calculations iterate to determine the minimum required footing diameter and depth to develop sufficient lateral soil bearing resistance.
The analyses demonstrate the caisson and footing designs are adequate to support the given load conditions based on code requirements.
This document provides design criteria and calculations for a caisson foundation and flagpole footing based on building codes. It includes input parameters, analysis, and checks for:
1) A caisson designed to transfer vertical and lateral loads into bedrock or suitable soil below unsatisfactory soil/water. Calculations check soil bearing capacity and caisson embedment length.
2) A flagpole footing designed to resist lateral loads from the pole. Calculations iterate to determine the minimum required footing diameter and depth to develop sufficient lateral soil bearing resistance.
The analyses demonstrate the caisson and footing designs are adequate to support the given load conditions based on code requirements.
This document provides design criteria and calculations for a caisson foundation and flagpole footing based on building codes. It includes input parameters, analysis, and checks for:
1) A caisson designed to transfer vertical and lateral loads into bedrock or suitable soil below unsatisfactory soil/water. Calculations check soil bearing capacity and caisson embedment length.
2) A flagpole footing designed to resist lateral loads from the pole. Calculations iterate to determine the minimum required footing diameter and depth to develop sufficient lateral soil bearing resistance.
The analyses demonstrate the caisson and footing designs are adequate to support the given load conditions based on code requirements.
This document provides design criteria and calculations for a caisson foundation and flagpole footing based on building codes. It includes input parameters, analysis, and checks for:
1) A caisson designed to transfer vertical and lateral loads into bedrock or suitable soil below unsatisfactory soil/water. Calculations check soil bearing capacity and caisson embedment length.
2) A flagpole footing designed to resist lateral loads from the pole. Calculations iterate to determine the minimum required footing diameter and depth to develop sufficient lateral soil bearing resistance.
The analyses demonstrate the caisson and footing designs are adequate to support the given load conditions based on code requirements.
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
PROJECT : PAGE :
CLIENT : DESIGN BY : JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY : Caisson Design Based on 2018 IBC & 2016 CBC
DESIGN CRITERIA 1. The caisson is designed to rest on an underlying stratum of rock or satisfactory soil and is used when unsatisfactory soil/water exists. If caisson bottom end not belled, the caisson has to be drilled into hard stratum 3'-0' minimum. 2. All vertical/axial loads are supported by the bottom end hard stratum. The lateral loads are supported by the embedded soil, Lembd, based on IBC/CBC Chapter 18.
INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY
DIMENTION Lembd = 24 ft, (7.32 m) Lcant = 10 ft, (3.05 m) D= 48 in, (1219 mm) STEEL PLATE THICKNESS ts = 0.375 in, (10 mm), zero for no tube.
STEEL YIELD STRESS Fy = 50 ksi, (345 MPa)
CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 5 ksi, (34 MPa) THE MAX CONCRETE STRESS b= 0.85 fc' (0.85 on ACI, 1.0 on AISC) VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT 12 # 11 (zero for no bars.) TOP LOADS (LRFD / SD level) Mu = 450 ft-kips, (610 kN-m) Pu = 260 kips, (1157 kN) Vu = 80 kips, (356 kN) THE DESIGN IS ADEQUATE.
ALLOW SOIL PRESSURE IN BOTTOM END STRATUM Qa = 18 ksf, ( 861.845 kN / m2)
ALLOWABLE LATERAL SOIL-BEARING PRESSURE IN EMBEDMENT Pp = 0.25 ksf / ft, ( 39.2719 [kN/m2] / m)
ANALYSIS CHECK SOIL END BEARING CAPACITY (ACI 318-14 13.3.1.1) 0.7 Pu + 0.25 p D2 (gc - gs) (Lembd + Lcant) = 216.18 kips, (962 kN) < 0.25 p D2 Qa = 226.19 kips, (1006 kN) [Satisfactory] Where gc = 0.15 kcf, one cubic foot of caisson weight gs = 0.07 kcf, soil/water weight
By trials, use pole depth, d = Lembd = 24.00 ft, (7.32 m) Lateral bearing @ bottom, S3 = 2 Pp Min( d , 12' ) = 6.00 ksf, ( 287.282 kN / m2) Lateral bearing @ d / 3, S1 = 2 Pp Min( d / 3 , 12' ) = 3.21 ksf, ( 153.638 kN / m2) Require Depth is given by
19.24 ft, (5.87 m) < Lembd [Satisfactory]
A 4.36h d 1 1 for nonconstrained 2 A 0.7 V = Where P= u 56 kips, (249 kN) A = 2.34 P / (D S1) = 10.2095 h = Mu / Vu + Lcont = 15.625 ft, (4.76 m)
> [Vu (Lcant + 0.67 Lembd) + Mu ] / f = 3228.9 ft-kips, (4378 kN-m) Solid Line - Tension Controlled [Satisfactory] Dash Line - Compression Controlled
CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY (ACI 318 13.2.7.2 & 22.5)
Vu / f = 106.7 kips, (474 kN) < 2 Ac (fc')0.5 = 248.0 kips, (1103 kN) [Satisfactory] where Ac = 1753.5 in2 ( 1131256 mm2 ) f= 0.75 PROJECT : PAGE : CLIENT : DESIGN BY : JOB NO. : DATE : REVIEW BY : Flagpole Footing Design Based on Chapter 18 of IBC & CBC INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY IS FOOTING RESTRAINED @ GRADE LEVEL ? (1=YES,0=NO) 0 no P LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P= 56.00 k HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h= 15.63 ft DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b= 4 ft h LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY S= 0.25 ksf / ft ISOLATED POLE FACTOR (IBC 09 1806.3.4) F= 2 FIRST TRIAL DEPTH ===> d = 24 ft
Use 4 ft dia x 19.24 ft deep footing unrestrained @ ground level d
ANALYSIS
LATERAL BEARING @ BOTTOM : S 3 FS Min d , 12 '
LATERAL BEARING @ d/3 : d S 1 FS Min , 12 ' 3 2.34 P A bS 1 A 4.36h 1 1 , FOR NONCONSTRAINED REQUIRD DEPTH : 2 A d 4.25 Ph , FOR CONSTRAINED bS 3
NONCONSTRAINED CONSTRAINED LATERAL FORCE @ TOP OF POLE P => 56.00 k 56.00 k HEIGHT OF POLE ABOVE GRADE h => 15.6 ft 15.6 ft DIAMETER OF POLE FOOTING b => 4.00 ft 4.00 ft LATERAL SOIL BEARING CAPACITY FS => 0.50 ksf / ft 0.50 ksf / ft
1ST TRIAL TRY d1 => 24.00 ft 24.00 ft
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 4.00 ksf 4.00 ksf LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 6.00 ksf 6.00 ksf CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 8.19 - - REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 16.60 ft 12.45 ft
2ND TRIAL : TRY d2=> 20.30 ft 18.22 ft
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.38 ksf 3.04 ksf LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 6.00 ksf 6.00 ksf CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 9.68 - - REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 18.57 ft 12.45 ft
3RD TRIAL : TRY d3=> 19.43 ft 15.34 ft
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.24 ksf 2.56 ksf LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 6.00 ksf 6.00 ksf CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 10.12 - - REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 19.12 ft 12.45 ft
4TH TRIAL : TRY d4=> 19.28 ft 13.89 ft
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.21 ksf 2.32 ksf LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 6.00 ksf 6.00 ksf CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 10.20 - - REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 19.23 ft 12.45 ft
5TH TRIAL : TRY d5=> 19.25 ft 13.17 ft
LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1/3 d S1 => 3.21 ksf 2.19 ksf LAT SOIL BEARING @ 1.0 d S3 => 6.00 ksf 6.00 ksf CONSTANT 2.34P/(bS1) A => 10.21 - - REQD FOOTING DEPTH RQRD d => 19.24 ft 12.45 ft
