- Intel is a domestic corporation engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing, and exporting integrated circuits. It filed a claim for a VAT refund/credit of 11.7 million pesos for input taxes from April to June 1998.
- The CTA denied the claim because Intel's export invoices did not indicate authority from the BIR to print them. However, the CA found that some of Intel's invoices did have proper BIR printing authority.
- The ruling was that Intel is entitled to the refund/credit because it proved its zero-rated export sales through documents like invoices, receipts, bills, and declarations in accordance with VAT law requirements for refunds on zero-rated sales.
- Intel is a domestic corporation engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing, and exporting integrated circuits. It filed a claim for a VAT refund/credit of 11.7 million pesos for input taxes from April to June 1998.
- The CTA denied the claim because Intel's export invoices did not indicate authority from the BIR to print them. However, the CA found that some of Intel's invoices did have proper BIR printing authority.
- The ruling was that Intel is entitled to the refund/credit because it proved its zero-rated export sales through documents like invoices, receipts, bills, and declarations in accordance with VAT law requirements for refunds on zero-rated sales.
- Intel is a domestic corporation engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing, and exporting integrated circuits. It filed a claim for a VAT refund/credit of 11.7 million pesos for input taxes from April to June 1998.
- The CTA denied the claim because Intel's export invoices did not indicate authority from the BIR to print them. However, the CA found that some of Intel's invoices did have proper BIR printing authority.
- The ruling was that Intel is entitled to the refund/credit because it proved its zero-rated export sales through documents like invoices, receipts, bills, and declarations in accordance with VAT law requirements for refunds on zero-rated sales.
- Intel is a domestic corporation engaged in designing, developing, manufacturing, and exporting integrated circuits. It filed a claim for a VAT refund/credit of 11.7 million pesos for input taxes from April to June 1998.
- The CTA denied the claim because Intel's export invoices did not indicate authority from the BIR to print them. However, the CA found that some of Intel's invoices did have proper BIR printing authority.
- The ruling was that Intel is entitled to the refund/credit because it proved its zero-rated export sales through documents like invoices, receipts, bills, and declarations in accordance with VAT law requirements for refunds on zero-rated sales.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2
INTEL VS CIR
Facts:
- domestic corporation engaged primarily in the business of designing, developing,
manufacturing and exporting advanced and large- scale integrated circuit components
- registered with the BIR as VAT entity
- registered with PEZA
· As a VAT-registered entity, Intel file its monthly VAT declarations and quarterly VAT return
· During the 2Q of 1998, Intel declared zero-rated export sales of 2.5Mn and VAT input taxes from domestic purchases of goods and services of 11.7Mn
- Zero-rated export sales were paid in acceptable foreign currency and were inwardly remitted
· On 1999, a claim for tax refund/credit of VAT input taxes was filed by Intel · Prior to the lapse of 2-year prescriptive prd and due to inaction by the CIR, a petition for review was filed with the CTA and prayed for the issuance of a tax credit certificate amtg to 11.7Mn
- for the period covering April 01, 1998 to June 30, 1998, having generated zero-rated sales and paid VAT input taxes in the course of its trade or business, which VAT input taxes are attributable to the zero-rated sales and have not been applied to any VAT output tax liability for said period or any succeeding quarter or quarters nor has been issued any tax credit certificate, it follows that it is entitled to the issuance of a tax credit certificate for VAT input taxes in the amount of PhP11,770,181.70
· CTA decision: denied the claim for tax refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate since the export invoices offered as evidence could not be considered as competent evidence to prove its zero-rated sales of goods for VAT purposes and for refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate because no BIR authority to print said invoices was indicated
· A petition for review was filed before the CA, arguing that the info (seller’s TIN, statement that seller is VAT-registered) required to be printed in the invoice or receipt do not apply to its export sales since no input VAT may be claimed and that the absence of BIR authority to print its TIN-V in some of the invoices is not fatal to its claim for refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate as to invalidate the documents used to prove its export sales · CA decision: since Intel issued invoices with the BIR’s authority to print, it must be concluded that these invoices were not registered as they did not comply with the invoicing requirements under Section 113, and the requirements for issuance of receipts or sales or commercial invoices under Section 237. Thus, an unregistered receipt could not be used as supporting document for input tax
Issue: W/N Intel is not entitled to a tax refund/credit for failure to comply with the invoicing requirements?
Ruling:
· a taxpayer engaged in zero-rated or effectively zero-rated transactions may apply for
a refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate for input taxes paid attributable to such sales upon complying with the following requisites: (1) the taxpayer is engaged in sales which are zero-rated (like export sales) or effectively zero-rated; (2) the taxpayer is VAT- registered; (3) the claim must be filed within two years after the close of the taxable quarter when such sales were made; (4) the creditable input tax due or paid must be attributable to such sales, except the transitional input tax, to the extent that such input tax has not been applied against the output tax; and (5) in case of zero-rated sales under Section 106(A)(2)(a)(1) and (2), Section 106(B), and Section 108(B)(1) and (2), the acceptable foreign currency exchange proceeds thereof had been duly accounted for in accordance with BSP rules and regulations.
· The docu evid submitted by Intel such as summary of export sales, sales invoices, official receipts, airway bills and export declarations, prove that it is engaged in the "sale and actual shipment of goods from the Philippines to a foreign country." Hence, Intel is considered engaged in export sales (a zero-rated transaction) if made by a VAT- registered entity
· the certification of inward remittances attests to the fact of payment "in acceptable foreign currency or its equivalent in goods or services, and accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the BSP
· Therefore, Intel’s evidence, juxtaposed with the requirements of Sections 106 (A)(2) (a)(1) and 112(A) of the Tax Code, as enumerated earlier, sufficiently establish that it is entitled to a claim for refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate for creditable input taxes.
