Chapter 01 PM
Chapter 01 PM
Chapter 01 PM
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
I. General
Project Identification is the process of searching for and subsequently finding potential projects
that could feasibly generate benefits in excess of costs accruing to the society and contributing
towards the attainment of specified development objectives. Project identification is made in
rather general terms with broader scope at the first glance and then, the idea will be progressively
developed. In the continuum, even alternative versions of the same may be conceived.
II. Who Identify Projects?
The following groups may identify projects:
Small producers organizations/producers’ unions
Large scale individual private sector producers
Product marketing organizations
Private sector companies (local/multinational)
State owned enterprises & organizations
Government ministries, authorities, agencies, and commissions
Development banks, local as well as foreign, and international development agencies
Other aid agencies and self aid associations
Local governments; state, regional, and sub-regional authorities
Local political & pressure groups such as oppositional parties
NGO’s: Local or international
Credit institutions & cooperatives
Credit unions, saving and loan associations, saving banks, commercial banks, etc.
PRE-IDENTIFICATION
“Pre-identification” is an important prelude to protect identification. The pre-identification stage
involves surveying, reviewing, inventorying, and analysis of strategies and policies, data about
natural resources, and socio-economic variables. This stage is a synonym to opportunity study
under the UNIDO cycle, which is very important phase in project planning. Unfortunately, this
aspect of planning is either totally ignored or for which inadequate resources are provided in
most developing countries. There are a number of reasons for disregarding this aspect in project
planning:
First and, perhaps, most important of all is the sheer ignorance: to learn its importance
and to identify ways of carrying out surveys; inventorying of resources; collection,
organization, and integrating data; and analyzing the information cost-effectively and
generate useful information.
Secondly, such work tends to be regarded as an extensive task resulting in excessive
overhead costs. Moreover, often, funds for such activities are expended in tight schedules
during end of budget period.
There are quite diverse micro-sources of project ideas that emanate from:
The identification of unsatisfied demand or needs
The existence of unused or underutilized natural or human resources and the perception
of opportunities from their efficient use
The need to remove shortages in essential materials, services, or facilities that constrain
development efforts
The initiative of private or public enterprises in response to incentives provided by the
government
The necessity to complement or expand investments previously undertaken
The desire of local groups or organizations to enhance their economic status and improve
their welfare
Analyze the performance of existing industries
Examine the inputs and outputs of various industries
Review imports and exports
Look at the suggestions of financial institutions and development agencies
Investigate local materials and resources
Analyze Economic and Social Trends
Study new Technological Developments
Draw clues from consumptions abroad
Explore the possibility of reviving sick units
Attend trade-fairs (trade promotion)
During the preliminary screening to eliminate ideas, which prima facie are not promising, it is
required to look into the aspects such as:
Compatibility with the promoter
Consistency with government priorities
Availability of inputs
Adequacy of market
Reasonableness of costs
Acceptability of risk level
During preliminary selection, the analyst should eliminate project proposals that:
Are technically unsound and risky;
Have no market for the output;
Have inadequate supply of inputs;
Are very costly in relation to benefits;
Assume over-ambitious sales and profitability.
Obviously, since the criteria tend to be somewhat nebulous (vague, imprecise, and ill-defined),
much depends on the experiences and sense of objectivity of the professionals applying them. It
is, however, necessary to conduct this screening, even with indistinct criteria, in order to reduce
the number of project alternatives to a manageable level to which more work and time will be
devoted. Indeed, project planning can be viewed as a process of elimination, i.e. elimination of
interior alternatives. As a result of the preliminary screening exercise, a project profile, an
opportunity study report, or an identification study report, as appropriate, is prepared showing
which project alternatives should be rejected and which ones may be advanced to the next stage.
PROCESS OF IDENTIFICATION
Lecture note for Project Analysis & Management Page 5
Generally, an idea of projects may come to our mind from observing existing opportunities and
problems in a given context. When we are more concerned about project identification, the
formal task of conducting identification studies, (opportunity studies), is one of the best available
option to project planners, which is critically important to generate and/or come up with useful
information.
The following table presents the approaches, aspects, and considerations in project
identification studies:
5. Brainstorming:
A group of people suggesting different ideas regarding future activities, very quickly,
before analyzing and/or considering the source of the idea more carefully.
Feeling of feasibility:
The observation studies, discussions, etc made in accordance with the above manner could
ultimately lead to the generation of project ideas. The individuals or entities generating the idea
develop a kind of feeling that the project ideas could be feasible. Those project ideas that seem to
be feasible would then become the basis for identification of potential projects that:
Could be thoroughly investigated & assessed
Need be supported by tangible and factual evidences
A bottom-up idea generation process requires base line surveys, which is based on the realities
existing in different localities.
May get community support, successfully implemented, and the potential benefits
might easily be visualized (seen) by the society. This may help to create goodwill and
positive images towards the institution.
Step 2: Screening project ideas: giving priorities based on resources, compatibility to objectives,
potential to enhance competitiveness, and value adding in the society.
Conflict of interest between local beneficiary group: (i.e. some groups may bear
the cost and others may get the benefit)
What are the costs & benefits of identified projects?
Who bears the costs & benefits in the society?
Is benefits accruing to other groups while the costs paid by a given local group
(unit)
Mechanisms to compensate those bearing the costs
Unless compensated, the consequences might be unfavorable, costly, and
severe as well.