Leading People Syllabus 2015
Leading People Syllabus 2015
Leading People Syllabus 2015
Organizational Behavior
Spring 2015 — Leading People
Course Overview
In this course, you will learn how to maximize human potential – both your own and those that
you will work with. Particularly because many of you will be part of human capital intensive
organizations in the future, you need to understand that a critical source of competitive
advantage often comes not from having the most ingenious product design, the best marketing
strategy, or the most efficient production system, but rather from having the ability to effectively
obtain, mobilize, and manage an organization’s human assets. Organizational leaders estimate
that they often spend up to of 30 percent of their time focusing on interpersonal issues.
Leadership is about coordinating the skills, talents, and resources of individuals and groups in
those combinations that best realize the organization’s opportunities. You must make things
happen, and often under conditions or schedules that are not of your own choosing and with very
vague and uncertain goals. This requires employees at all levels to be able to diagnose problems,
make effective decisions, influence and motivate others, manage their personal contacts, bring
1
UGBA105: Spring 2015
out the best in their colleagues, optimize cross-functional teams, and drive organizational
change.
This course prepares you to achieve these objectives. It provides fundamental tools from the
behavioral and social sciences that will improve your ability to analyze organizational dynamics,
and manage effectively, while at the same time maintaining your own ethical compass. Beyond
intelligence and technical skills, what separates effective employees and managers from average
ones is a set of social skills and awareness. This course identifies these skills and will provide
ideas and tools for improving them. Our goal is to help you think about your behaviors—and
other people’s perceptions of your behaviors—and then leverage this awareness to improve in
areas that matter to you.
Class time will be divided between a lecture on theory and scientific findings on Mondays, along
with class discussion on Wednesdays. Attendance is mandatory for both lecture and discussion
sections.
On Wednesdays, class sessions will involve various activities, such as a face-to-face negotiation
exercise, case studies, videos, and feedback from online exercises to illustrate the weekly topics.
Exercises illustrate particular concepts very well and also provide for experiential learning. Case
studies help us better understand particular industries as well as act as a vehicle for detailed in-
class discussions. Finally, videos are a very straightforward medium to convey particular settings
and experiments. You should come to class prepared to summarize key points from the day’s
readings and to contribute to the case analysis. As you complete the reading, it may be helpful to
ask yourself:
2
UGBA105: Spring 2015
A large class requires careful attention to fairness and respect for one another. In particular, case
discussions are a way for you to learn from one another, and the myriad of experiences each of
you bring. I expect class discussion to be lively and engaging. Therefore, I propose the following
simple code of conduct:
• Attend class on time. It enhances the value of the class not only for you but for everyone
when you are present and you participate. If you have an unavoidable conflict, please do
not disturb your classmates when arriving late, leaving early, or by asking to have
information you missed repeated during the class.
• There are no unexcused absences. Attendance will be taken multiple times during lecture
and sections, at random. If you email me or the GSIs about missing a class, the only
response you will get (if any) is: “see the syllabus.” The only exceptions are university-
sanctioned excused absence pre-determined by academic affairs, personal illness, or
death of a family member. Contact your GSI with the appropriate certification.
• No late work will be accepted. This applies to in-class assignments, online assignments,
or other class-related work. Do not ask. No exceptions will be made for late work ever
(because you will have had the assignments and due-dates in advance).
• There are no make-ups for missed in-class exercises. If you need to know what happened
in class on a day you missed, you will need to ask a student/friend/colleague. If you email
me about this, the only response you will get (if any) is: “see the syllabus.”
• There are too many wonderful causes to support and we simply do not have time for them
all to be announced. To be fair to all, the answer needs to be “no” to all. If you email me
about this, the only response you will get (if any) is: “see the syllabus.”
• This course adheres to the guidelines established in the Berkeley Code of Conduct, which
can be found at http://www.haas.berkeley.edu/Undergrad/academic_guidelines.html.
Students with disabilities seeking academic accommodation in this course need to promptly
notify the instructor by providing a Letter of Accommodation from the Disabled Students
Program. Notice of accommodation later than three weeks may result in an inability to timely
provide accommodations.
3
UGBA105: Spring 2015
Students with disabilities granted extended time on examinations will be scheduled to start
exams at the same time as other students unless there are extenuating circumstances such as
another exam. Failure to notify me of such a conflict within three weeks of the start of the
semester may mean that an examination cannot be timely rescheduled.
Information about special examination room accommodations will be provided via email a
week before the exam is scheduled. Please immediately contact your instructor if you have
not received an email with detailed examination accommodation information no later than
three business days prior to the date the course examination is scheduled.
Student-Athletes
The complete guidelines are available on the Academic Senate website. Additionally,
a checklist to help instructors and students comply with the guidelines is available on the Center
for Teaching and Learning website.
The exams will assess how well you have learned the material by asking you to apply concepts,
and think critically. Exam questions will cover material from readings, lectures, videos, cases,
and class discussion.
4
UGBA105: Spring 2015
No make-up exams are allowed. If you have some extenuating circumstances, this is between
you and the administration. Once your issue has been resolved at an administration-level, they
will contact me to inform me (in other words, do not contact me and ask for special
arrangements).
• Midterm exams (20% + 20%) The midterms will consist in multiple-choice questions
regarding concepts covered in lecture and section up to the exam date. The midterms are
closed notes, closed book exams. The second midterm is cumulative, meaning that it will
include questions covering concepts taught early in the course as well. Exams are closed
book, closed notes – no materials are allowed. We will provide Scantron sheets.
• Final exam (5%). In preparation for the final exam you will receive four questions via
email at least a week in advance. You are responsible for preparing your answers
independently, without consulting with your colleagues (under 500 words per answer).
The final exam will consist of two of these questions that you prepared in advance –
questions that I will choose and share with you in class at the start of the exam. You will
be expected to write a written response without consulting your notes or any other
materials. You are expected to bring your own Blue Books for the exam.
This class is one in which the scientific method serves as the basis for all knowledge of self,
others, and organizations. A critical piece of the scientific process is participating in experiments
and studies so that you can begin to understand first-hand how hypotheses are developed and
tested; so that you can see and feel first-hand how a study is executed successfully (or
unsuccessfully). So in this class you will be expected to participate in four (4) hour worth of
experiments. Some of these experiments are one (1) hour long, others are 30 minutes long (and
some are even shorter/longer). It is up to you to sign up early for these experiments. If the end of
the term comes and there are none left to participate in, that will be your responsibility and your
grade will suffer accordingly. No special accommodations or arrangements will be made for
anyone who finds him or herself at the end of the term with no available experiments to fulfill
this requirement. Fulfillment of this requirement—like all other assignments and exams in this
course—is 100% your responsibility. Tracking your completion of these experiment
5
UGBA105: Spring 2015
participation hours is also 100% your responsibility. For more information, see the last two pages
of the syllabus. Note: students find participating in experiments more interesting and more
beneficial to their learning than other alternatives.
Grading Policies
The Haas School of Business grading policy uses a consistent grade policy across all degree
programs. The policy has three goals: to ensure that grading is fair across courses; to encourage
students to take their coursework seriously; to hold faculty accountable to the rigorous standards
of the Haas School of Business. The mean GPA of core courses in the undergraduate program
should be a maximum of 3.2-3.4. The grade distribution is flexible as long as the mean does not
exceed this cap.
As with all UC Berkeley courses, letter grades are assigned a point value as follows:
A+ = A = 4.0; A– = 3.7; B+ = 3.3; B = 3.0; B– = 2.7; C+ = 2.3; C = 2.0; C– = 1.7;
D+ = 1.3; D = 1.0; D– = 0.7; and F = none.
To appeal a grade: submit an email or printed request to your GSI explaining your position
(along with the original assignment) within 7 days of receiving your grade. Document your
points with the appropriate course material. After reviewing your explanation we will either
award you additional points or schedule a meeting with you to discuss the disputed issue(s). We
reserve the right to re-grade the entire assignment when an appeal is submitted. This can result
in a lower grade.
Course materials
The case studies will be available through Study.net. Readings are available through the UC
Berkeley library catalog.
6
UGBA105: Spring 2015
7
UGBA105: Spring 2015
Readings:
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2006. Evidence-based management. Harvard Business Review.
Malone, Thomas W.; Laubacher, Robert J.; Johns, Tammy. Jul/Aug2011. The Age of
Hyper Specialization. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 89 Issue 7/8, p.56-65.
Pentland, Alex "Sandy". Apr 2012. The New Science of Building Great Teams. Harvard
Business Review. Vol. 90 Issue 4, p.60-70.
Edmondson, Amy C. Apr 2012. Teamwork On the Fly. Harvard Business Review. Vol. 90
Issue 4, p72-80
Lepore, J. Oct 2009. Not so fast. The New Yorker.
Readings:
Gardner, Heidi K. Apr 2012. Coming Through When It Matters Most. Harvard Business
Review. Vol. 90 Issue 4, p82-91.
Neilson, Gary L.; Wulf, Julie. Apr 2012. How Many Direct Reports? Harvard Business
Review. Vol. 90 Issue 4, p112-119.
Hansen, Morten T. Apr 2009. When Internal Collaboration Is Bad for Your Company.
Harvard Business Review. Vol. 87 Issue 4, p.82-88.
Reading:
Silverman, R.E. 2011. My colleague, my paymaster. Wall Street Journal
Clifford, S. 2011, Aug 6. Would you like a smile with that? New York Times.
Goffee, Rob and Gareth Jones. May 2013.Creating the Best Workplace on Earth: What
employees really require to be their most productive. Harvard Business Review.
Ready, Douglas A. and Emily Truelove. Dec 2011. The Power of Collective Ambition.
Harvard Business Review.
Nohria, Nitin, Boris Groysberg, and Linda-Eling Lee. Jul-Aug 2008. Employee
Motivation: A Powerful New Model. Harvard Business Review.
Assignment:
Motivation exercise (due on Sunday February 8 at 5PM)
8
UGBA105: Spring 2015
Readings:
Gladwell, M. Dec 15, 2008. Most likely to succeed: How do you hire when we can't tell
who's right for the job? The New Yorker.
Gladwell, M. 2000, May 29. The new‐boy network. The New Yorker.
Bunker, Kerry A.; Kram, Kathy E.; Ting, Sharon. Dec 2002.The young and the clueless.
Harvard Business Review. Vol. 80 Issue 12, p. 80-87.
Ciara Byrne. Sep 20, 2011. People Analytics: How Google does HR by the numbers. The
New York Times.
Willams, C. Joan. Oct 2014. Hacking Tech’s Diversity Problem. Harvard Business Review.
Readings:
Ibarra, Herminia; Obodaru, Otilia. Jan 2009. Women and the Vision Thing. Harvard
Business Review. Vol. 87 Issue 1, p. 62-70.
Ibarra, Herminia; Hansen, Morten T. Jul-Aug2011. Are you a collaborative leader?
Harvard Business Review. Vol. 89 Issue 7/8, p.68-74.
Cuddy, Amy J.C., Matthew Kohut, and John Neffinger. Jul-Aug 2013. Connect, Then
Lead: To exert influence, you must balance competence with warmth. Harvard
Business Review.
Study Questions:
1. How well has Barbara Norris done in her first month as nurse manager of GSU?
Was she a good choice for the position?
2. What changes is she trying to make and why?
3. What are 3 obstacles to effecting change Norris should anticipate and how should
she address them?
4. Please devise an action plan for Norris.
Decision making
Readings:
Denrell, J. Apr 2005. Selection bias and the perils of benchmarking. Harvard Business
Review. Vol. 83 Issue 4, p. 114-119.
Tierney, John. Aug 17, 2011. Do You Suffer From Decision Making Fatigue? The New
York Times.
9
UGBA105: Spring 2015
Assignment:
Decision making exercise (due on Sunday March 8 at 5PM)
Mid-term exam I
Discussion:
No discussion session
Readings:
Cialdini, R. Oct 2001. Harnessing the Science of Persuasion. Harvard Business Review.
Vol. 79 Issue 9, p72-79.
Williams, Gary A.; Miller, Robert B. May 2002. Change the Way You Persuade. Harvard
Business Review. Vol. 80 Issue 5, p. 65-73.
Zimbardo Prison Study
http://www.stanfordalumni.org/news/magazine/2011/julaug/features/spe.html
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0jYx8nwjFQ]
Social networks
Readings:
Gladwell, M. Jan 11, 1999. Six Degrees of Lois Weisberg. The New Yorker.
Uzzi, Brian and Shannon Dunlap. Dec 2005. How to build your network. Harvard Business
Review.
Assignment:
Network assessment exercise (due on Sunday April 5 at 5PM)
Topic:
Negotiation & conflict resolution
Readings:
Fortgang, Ron S.; Lax, David A.; Sebenius, James K. Feb 2003. Negotiating the Spirit of
the Deal. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p. 66-75.
Leary, Kimberlyn, Julianna Pillemer, and Michael Wheeler. Jan-Feb 2013. Negotiating with
Emotion: High-stakes deal making is fraught with feeling. Should we really ignore that?
10
UGBA105: Spring 2015
Assignment:
Reading emotions exercise (due on Sunday April 14 at 5PM)
Topic:
Ethical issues & conflicts of interest
Readings:
Bazerman, Max H.; Tenbrunsel, Ann E. Apr 2011. Ethical Breakdowns. Harvard Business
Review. Vol. 89 Issue 4, p58-65.
Banaji, Mahzarin R.; Bazerman, Max H.; Chugh, Dolly. Dec 2003. How (Un)Ethical Are
You? Harvard Business Review. Vol. 81 Issue 12, p56-64.
Study Questions:
1. As Martha McCaskey, what is your plan of action for finishing the Silicon 6 project?
Please map out your detailed plan of action.
2. What is troubling McCaskey? Do you agree with her assessment of the situation?
3. Was this solution avoidable? How did McCaskey end up in this situation?
Assignment:
Tough choices exercise (due on Sunday April 21 at 5PM)
Discussion:
Review session
Final Exam
11
UGBA105: Spring 2015
For any questions regarding the RPP contact the RPP coordinator at
silva_kurtisa@berkeley.edu
Experiments will be posted on experiment online management system:
http://haas.sona-systems.com
In addition to the pre-measure questionnaire packet, 4-5 different experimental studies will be
run during the semester. Haas faculty and graduate students will conduct these studies. At the
end of these studies you will be debriefed and given time to ask questions about the study.
You will be emailed when an experiment is about to be run so that you can sign up to
participate in it. You are allowed to participate in and receive credits for up to 4 hours of
studies. If you fulfill all of your required experimental hours, you will receive 100% credit; if
you fulfill only a portion of your required experimental hours, you will receive credit only for
the portion you completed.
If you decline participation in the experimental studies, the alternative option by which you
can fulfill the research requirement is to write one 2-page critical analysis (double-spaced)
for each hour that you do not participate in a research experiment. The articles are selected by
the RPP coordinator from OB journals such as Academy of Management Journal,
Organization Science, or Harvard Business Review and describe key constructs from
organizational behavior. If you decide to forego all four experimental hours, you may write
one 8- page critical analysis. These alternative papers are due no later than 12pm on May
15th and should be emailed as an attachment to silva_kurtisa@berkeley.edu.
Policy regarding students who fail to show up for a scheduled appointment (unexcused
absence – the student does not cancel the study sign-up by the specified deadline and fails to
contact the researcher in charge of the study): UGBA105 students have a decrease in the
number of credits that can be earned through participation in research experiments but can still
earn the same maximum number of credits by completing the alternative non-research
activity. For example, the students can earn up to 4 research credits. If a student has
unexcused absence for one 1 hour experiment, the student is allowed to earn a maximum of 3
12
UGBA105: Spring 2015
research credits by participating in other experiments but must earn a forth research credit by
completing the alternative non-research activity that involves a comparable amount of time
and effort— by writing a 2-page paper.
13