[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Display PDF PDF

    Uploaded by

    Krishnan Kozhumam
    1) This judgment is from the Principal District Court of Kanniyakumari in Nagercoil, India regarding a civil suit over a property dispute (OS No.132/2012). 2) The suit was filed by the plaintiff S.L. Thangam seeking a decree for title and possession of a scheduled property, as well as permanent injunction and recovery of costs. 3) After hearing arguments from advocates representing the various defendants, the court dismissed an interim application and abated the suit, without issuing a final decree in the matter.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Display PDF PDF

    Uploaded by

    Krishnan Kozhumam
    23 views2 pages
    1) This judgment is from the Principal District Court of Kanniyakumari in Nagercoil, India regarding a civil suit over a property dispute (OS No.132/2012). 2) The suit was filed by the plaintiff S.L. Thangam seeking a decree for title and possession of a scheduled property, as well as permanent injunction and recovery of costs. 3) After hearing arguments from advocates representing the various defendants, the court dismissed an interim application and abated the suit, without issuing a final decree in the matter.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    display_pdf (12).pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) This judgment is from the Principal District Court of Kanniyakumari in Nagercoil, India regarding a civil suit over a property dispute (OS No.132/2012). 2) The suit was filed by the plaintiff S.L. Thangam seeking a decree for title and possession of a scheduled property, as well as permanent injunction and recovery of costs. 3) After hearing arguments from advocates representing the various defendants, the court dismissed an interim application and abated the suit, without issuing a final decree in the matter.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    23 views2 pages

    Display PDF PDF

    Uploaded by

    Krishnan Kozhumam
    1) This judgment is from the Principal District Court of Kanniyakumari in Nagercoil, India regarding a civil suit over a property dispute (OS No.132/2012). 2) The suit was filed by the plaintiff S.L. Thangam seeking a decree for title and possession of a scheduled property, as well as permanent injunction and recovery of costs. 3) After hearing arguments from advocates representing the various defendants, the court dismissed an interim application and abated the suit, without issuing a final decree in the matter.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KANNIYAKUMARI AT

    NAGERCOIL

    Present:- Thiru S. KARUPPIAH, B.Sc., B.L.,


    Principal District Judge.
    Thursday the 16th day of August, 2018
    OS No.132/2012

    S.L.Thangam ...Plaintiff
    .Vs.
    1. G.Hariharan,
    2. D.Vijula
    3. N. Thiagarajan
    4. Freeda Rani
    5. Lakshmi Rama Sundaram
    6. C.Rama Sundaram
    7. Rugmoni Ammal ....Defendants

    This Suit is coming on this day for final hearing before me in the presence
    of Thiru.D.Hari Advocate for the plaintiff, and of Thiru.R.Arumugha
    Perumal Advocate for the 1, 5, 6th defendants, Thiru.S.Vijayaraghavan
    Advocate for the 3rd defendant, Thiru.K.Subakaravel Advocate for the 4 th
    defendant , IA petition is dismissed and this Court delivered the following:-
    JUDGMENT
    This Suit is filed to pass a decree the title and possession of plaintiff over
    the plaint scheduled property. Decree for permanent injunction restraining the
    defendants or anybody claiming under them from disturbing or in any way
    interfering in any manner with the title and possession of the plaintiff over the
    plaint scheduled property 2nd and 3rd defendants in favour of 4th defendant is null
    and void and is not binding on the plaintiff or plaint scheduled property and
    decree for recovery of costs of the suit.
    IA.365/2013 is dismissed. Suit abated.

    Pronounced by me in the Open Court this the 16 th day of August, 2018.

    J.C. Shr. Principal District Judge


    Fair/Draft Judgement
    OS No.132/2012
    Dated :16.08.2018
    Principal District Court,
    Nagercoil.

    You might also like