[go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 93 views

    Anita

    Uploaded by

    Ashesh Singh
    This document is a bail application filed in the High Court of Rajasthan by Anita, who has been charged under Sections 302, 323, 325, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC for offenses related to the death of Emdan. Anita argues that she has been falsely implicated, that the investigation is still pending against her under Section 173(8) of the CrPC, and that she should be granted anticipatory bail given that she is a woman with small children and no risk of absconding. She requests that the court grant her anticipatory bail.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Anita

    Uploaded by

    Ashesh Singh
    93 views4 pages
    This document is a bail application filed in the High Court of Rajasthan by Anita, who has been charged under Sections 302, 323, 325, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC for offenses related to the death of Emdan. Anita argues that she has been falsely implicated, that the investigation is still pending against her under Section 173(8) of the CrPC, and that she should be granted anticipatory bail given that she is a woman with small children and no risk of absconding. She requests that the court grant her anticipatory bail.

    Original Description:

    bail 4

    Original Title

    anita (438)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is a bail application filed in the High Court of Rajasthan by Anita, who has been charged under Sections 302, 323, 325, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC for offenses related to the death of Emdan. Anita argues that she has been falsely implicated, that the investigation is still pending against her under Section 173(8) of the CrPC, and that she should be granted anticipatory bail given that she is a woman with small children and no risk of absconding. She requests that the court grant her anticipatory bail.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    93 views4 pages

    Anita

    Uploaded by

    Ashesh Singh
    This document is a bail application filed in the High Court of Rajasthan by Anita, who has been charged under Sections 302, 323, 325, 147, 148, 149 of the IPC for offenses related to the death of Emdan. Anita argues that she has been falsely implicated, that the investigation is still pending against her under Section 173(8) of the CrPC, and that she should be granted anticipatory bail given that she is a woman with small children and no risk of absconding. She requests that the court grant her anticipatory bail.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

    AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

    S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. ______/2003

    Anita
    w/o Sh. Kamlesh
    r/o Harnathpura PS Bandikui, District Dausa
    …. Applicant

    VERSUS

    State of Rajasthan through P.P.


    …..Respondent

    S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438

    Cr.P.C. IN F.I.R. NO. 313/2002 REGISTERED AT

    POLICE STATION BANDIKUI FOR OFFENCES U/S

    302, 323, 325, 147, 148, 149 I.P.C. AND AGAINST THE

    ORDER DATED 2.6.2003 PASSED BY THE

    ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE, DAUSA WHEREBY

    THE BAIL APPLICATION NO. 41/2003 FILED BY

    THE APPLICANT WAS DISMISSED.

    To,

    The Hon’ble Chief Justice Sh. Anil Dev Singh and his companion Judges
    of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur.

    MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIPS :

    The humble accused/applicant most respectfully submits as under :

    1
    1. That an FIR No. 313/2002 came to be registered in Police Station

    Bandikui to the following effect

    '' lsok esa Jheku~ dksroky lkgc iqfyl dksrokyh


    ckanhdqbZ egksn; fuosnu gS fd vkt 'kke dks djhc 8 cts
    es esjk HkkbZ egsUnz o v'kksd esjh Hkkoh n;koarh o
    jkeiky xkMZ xzke voriqjk esa viuh cksfjax [ksrksa ls
    vius VªsDVj esa cSBdj ckanhdqbZ vius ?kj vk jgs Fks
    fd fnun;ky f'kopj.k deys'k] fotsUnz o f=yksd iq=ku
    y{e.k Hkokuh 'kadj 'kkfUr ifRu y{k.k lquhrk cfgu o
    deys'k dh ifRu us vius ?kj ds lkeus VªsDVj dks tcju jksd
    fy;k vkSj nhun;ky us esjs etZ egsUnz tks VªsDVj
    Fkkuk jgk Fkk ds gky ij ryokj dh tkjh v'kksd mls cpkus
    yxk rks nhun;ky us muds flj ij ryokj dh ekjh f'kopj.k
    deys'k us cfNZ;ksa ls o fotsUnz Hkqokuh 'kadj o
    f=yksd us VkaVa;k ls o 'kkfUr lquhrk o deys'k dh ifRu
    us ykfB;ksa ls v'kksd dks ekjihV dj xEHkhj pksVsa
    igqapkbZ ftlls ml dh ekSds ij gh e`R;q gks xbZA mDr
    lHkh yksxksa us esjs jkeiky o esjh HkkHkh ds lkFk
    Hkh ekjihV dh ftlls ge lHkh yksxksa ds 'kjhj ij txg&txg
    xaHkhj pksVsa vkbZ gSA fjiksVZ djrk gwaA
    dk;Zokgh dh tkosA izkFkhZ ,l-Mh- lqjsUnz dqekj
    'kekZ iq= guqeku izlkn 'kekZ tkfr czkge.k fu-
    ckanhdqbZ tkaxhj rk- 9-06-02''

    2. That as per the postmortem report the deceased passed away due to injury

    on head cause by sharp edged weapon. The fatal injury on the head is

    attributed to Deendayal. In the FIR the complainant Surendra Kumar

    2
    attributes lathi blow to three ladies the present applicant, her sister-in-law

    and mother-in-law. In the post mortem report there are only two injuries

    which are bruises caused by blunt object on left thigh and right thigh

    which are both non vital part. These two injuries are ascribed on three

    persons.

    3. That besides the FIR lodger the other eye witnesses do not impute any role

    on the applicant as far as injuries on the person of the deceased is

    concerned. In fact the role attributed to the applicant her mother-in-law and

    sister-in-law is qua Smt. Dayawati and not qua the deceased.

    4. That the FIR suffers from over implication and ladies of the house have

    been involved through crafty manipulation so as to put behind bars the

    entire family.

    5. That there are small children of the applicant, the applicant is a lady and

    therefore on humanitarian grounds the applicant is entitled to bail.

    6. That the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case without any

    basis.

    7. That there are no chances of his abscondance or tempering with evidence.

    8. That investigation is pending against the applicant under sec.173(8) CrPC.

    9. That investigation is complete and challan has been filed against other

    accused persons.

    10. That other grounds would be taken up at the time of arguments.

    PRAYER

    3
    It is therefore, prayed that your lordships may very graciously be

    pleased to accept this Criminal Bail Application and may be pleased to

    release the petitioner on anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC..

    HUMBLE APPLICANT
    THROUGH COUNSEL
    PLACE : JAIPUR
    DATE :

    [Swadeep Singh Hora / Govind Singh]


    Advocates

    NOTES :

    1. This is Bail Application. No such application has been filed before this
    Hon'ble Court.
    2. That as pie papers were not readily available hence stout papers have been
    used.
    3. That one spare copy of this bail application has been given to the counsel
    for the opposite party.
    4. That it has been typed by my private steno.

    ADVOCATE

    You might also like