Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Math 361
Math 361
Albert Cohen
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 1 / 161
Course Information
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 2 / 161
Course Information
Many examples within these slides are used with kind permission of
Prof. Dmitry Kramkov, Dept. of Mathematics, Carnegie Mellon
University.
Book for course: Financial Mathematics: A Comprehensive Treatment
(Chapman and Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics Series) 1st Edition.
Can be found in MSU bookstores now
Some examples here will be similar to those practice questions
publicly released by the SOA. Please note the SOA owns the
copyright to these questions.
This book will be our reference, and some questions for assignments
will be chosen from it. Copyright for all questions used from this book
belongs to Chapman and Hall/CRC Press .
From time to time, we will also follow the format of Marcel Finan’s A
Discussion of Financial Economics in Actuarial Models: A Preparation
for the Actuarial Exam MFE/3F. Some proofs from there will be
referenced as well. Please find these notes here
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 3 / 161
What are financial securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 4 / 161
What are financial securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 4 / 161
What are financial securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 4 / 161
What are financial securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 4 / 161
How does one fairly price non-traded securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 5 / 161
How does one fairly price non-traded securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 5 / 161
How does one fairly price non-traded securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 5 / 161
How does one fairly price non-traded securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 5 / 161
How does one fairly price non-traded securities?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 5 / 161
More Questions
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 6 / 161
And What About...
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 7 / 161
And What About...
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 7 / 161
Notation
Forward Contract:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 8 / 161
Notation
Forward Contract:
A financial instrument whose initial value is zero, and whose final
value is derived from another asset. Namely, the difference of the
final asset price and forward price:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 8 / 161
Notation
Forward Contract:
A financial instrument whose initial value is zero, and whose final
value is derived from another asset. Namely, the difference of the
final asset price and forward price:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 8 / 161
Notation
Interest Rate:
The rate r at which money grows. Also used to discount the value
today of one unit of currency one unit of time from the present
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 9 / 161
Notation
Interest Rate:
The rate r at which money grows. Also used to discount the value
today of one unit of currency one unit of time from the present
1
V (0) = , V (1) = 1 (2)
1+r
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 9 / 161
An Example of Replication
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 10 / 161
An Example of Replication
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 10 / 161
An Example of Replication
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 10 / 161
An Example of Replication
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 10 / 161
An Example of Replication
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 10 / 161
An Example of Replication: Solution
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 11 / 161
An Example of Replication: Solution
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 11 / 161
An Example of Replication: Solution
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 11 / 161
An Example of Replication: Solution
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 11 / 161
An Example of Replication: Solution
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 12 / 161
An Example of Replication: Solution
1 + rA
FAB = SAB = 3.667 (4)
1 + rB
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 12 / 161
Discrete Probability Space
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 13 / 161
Discrete Probability Space
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 13 / 161
Discrete Probability Space
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 13 / 161
Discrete Probability Space
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 13 / 161
Discrete Probability Space
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 13 / 161
Arbitrage
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 14 / 161
Arbitrage
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 14 / 161
Arbitrage
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 14 / 161
Arbitrage
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 14 / 161
Arbitrage
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 14 / 161
Derivative Pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 15 / 161
Derivative Pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 15 / 161
Derivative Pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 15 / 161
Derivative Pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 15 / 161
Derivative Pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 15 / 161
Put-Call Parity
Can we replicate a forward contract using zero coupon bonds and put and
call options?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 16 / 161
Put-Call Parity
Can we replicate a forward contract using zero coupon bonds and put and
call options?
Yes: The final value of a replicating strategy X has value
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 16 / 161
Put-Call Parity
Can we replicate a forward contract using zero coupon bonds and put and
call options?
Yes: The final value of a replicating strategy X has value
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 16 / 161
Put-Call Parity
Can we replicate a forward contract using zero coupon bonds and put and
call options?
Yes: The final value of a replicating strategy X has value
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 16 / 161
Put-Call Parity
Can we replicate a forward contract using zero coupon bonds and put and
call options?
Yes: The final value of a replicating strategy X has value
F −K
V0C − V0P = (8)
1+r
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 16 / 161
Put-Call Parity
Can we replicate a forward contract using zero coupon bonds and put and
call options?
Yes: The final value of a replicating strategy X has value
F −K
V0C − V0P = (8)
1+r
Question: How would this change in a multi-period model?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 16 / 161
General Derivative Pricing -One period model
If we begin with some initial capital X0 , then we end with X1 (ω). To price
a derivative, we need to match
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 17 / 161
Replicating Strategy
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 18 / 161
Replicating Strategy
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 18 / 161
Replicating Strategy
Pathwise, we compute
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 18 / 161
Replicating Strategy
Pathwise, we compute
Algebra yields
V1 (H) − V1 (T )
∆0 = (11)
(u − d)S0
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 18 / 161
Risk Neutral Probability
Let us assume the existence of a pair (p̃, q̃) of positive numbers, and use
these to multiply our pricing equation(s):
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 19 / 161
Risk Neutral Probability
Let us assume the existence of a pair (p̃, q̃) of positive numbers, and use
these to multiply our pricing equation(s):
Addition yields
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 19 / 161
If we constrain
0 = p̃u + q̃d − (1 + r )
1 = p̃ + q̃
0 ≤ p̃
0 ≤ q̃
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 20 / 161
If we constrain
0 = p̃u + q̃d − (1 + r )
1 = p̃ + q̃
0 ≤ p̃
0 ≤ q̃
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 21 / 161
Example: Pricing a forward contract
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 21 / 161
This leads to the explicit price
F = p̃uS0 + q̃dS0
= (p̃)(1.25)(400) + (1 − p̃)(0.75)(400)
= 500p̃ + 300 − 300p̃ = 300 + 200p̃
1 + 0.05 − 0.75 3
= 300 + 200 · = 300 + 200 ·
1.25 − 0.75 5
= 420
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 22 / 161
This leads to the explicit price
F = p̃uS0 + q̃dS0
= (p̃)(1.25)(400) + (1 − p̃)(0.75)(400)
= 500p̃ + 300 − 300p̃ = 300 + 200p̃
1 + 0.05 − 0.75 3
= 300 + 200 · = 300 + 200 ·
1.25 − 0.75 5
= 420
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 22 / 161
General one period risk neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 23 / 161
General one period risk neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 24 / 161
General one period risk neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 24 / 161
General one period risk neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 24 / 161
General one period risk neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 24 / 161
Example: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
S1 (ω1 ) = uS0
S1 (ω2 ) = S0
S1 (ω3 ) = dS0
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 25 / 161
Example: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
S1 (ω1 ) = uS0
S1 (ω2 ) = S0
S1 (ω3 ) = dS0
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 25 / 161
Example: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
Homework:
Try our first example with
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 26 / 161
Example: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
Homework:
Try our first example with
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 26 / 161
Solution: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 27 / 161
Solution: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
1
V0C = Ẽ[(S1 − 420)+ | S0 = 400]
1.05 (17)
0.2625
= × (500 − 420) = 20.
1.05
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 28 / 161
Solution: Risk Neutral measure for trinomial case
1
V0C = Ẽ[(S1 − 420)+ | S0 = 400]
1.05 (17)
0.2625
= × (500 − 420) = 20.
1.05
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 28 / 161
Exchange one stock for another
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 29 / 161
Exchange one stock for another
In this case, our matrix M is such that
1 1 1 1
M = 110 100 80 101 (21)
105 100 95 101
which results in
3
1 0 0 10
6
rref (M) = 0 1 0
10 . (22)
1
0 0 1 10
It follows that
Ẽ[Y1 ] − Ẽ[X1 ]
W0 = = Y0 − X0 = 0
1.01 (23)
1 1.5
V0 = · (15p̃3 ) = = 1.49.
1.01 1.01
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 30 / 161
Existence of Risk Neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 31 / 161
Existence of Risk Neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 31 / 161
Existence of Risk Neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 31 / 161
Existence of Risk Neutral measure
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 31 / 161
Complete Markets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 32 / 161
Complete Markets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 32 / 161
Complete Markets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 32 / 161
Optimal Investment for a Strictly Risk Averse Investor
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 33 / 161
Optimal Investment for a Strictly Risk Averse Investor
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 34 / 161
Optimal Investment for a Strictly Risk Averse Investor
Theorem
Define X̂1 via the relationship
U 0 X̂1 := λZ (27)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 35 / 161
Optimal Investment for a Strictly Risk Averse Investor
Proof.
Assume X1 to be an arbitrary strategy with initial capital x. Then for
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 36 / 161
Optimal Investment: Example
U(x) = ln (x)
(31)
(S0 , u, d, p, q, r ) = (400, 1.25.0.75, 0.5, 0.5, 0.05).
It follows that
3 2
(p̃, q̃) = ,
5 5
(32)
6 4
(Z (H), Z (T )) = , .
5 5
Since U 0 (x) = x1 , we have
1 1
X̂1 (ω) =
λ Z (ω)
(33)
1 1 1p 1q 1 1
x = X0 = Ẽ[X̂1 ] = p̃ · + q̃ · = .
1+r 1+r λ p̃ λ q̃ λ1+r
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 37 / 161
Optimal Investment: Example
x(1 + r )
X̂1 (ω) =
Z (ω)
u(x) = p ln X̂1 (H) + (1 − p) ln X̂1 (T )
(34)
x(1 + r ) x(1 + r )
= p ln + (1 − p) ln
Z (H) Z (T )
(1 + r )
= ln x = ln (1.0717x) > ln (1.05x).
Z (H)p Z (T )1−p
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 38 / 161
Optimal Investment: Example
ˆ 0 S0
∆ S0 X̂1 (H) − X̂1 (T ) 1+r
1 1
π̂0 := = = −
X0 x S1 (H) − S1 (T ) u − d Z (H) Z (T )
(35)
1+r p 1−p 1.05 5 5
= − = − = −0.875.
u − d p̃ 1 − p̃ 0.5 6 4
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 39 / 161
Optimal Investment: Example
1+r p 1−p
In fact, since π̂0 = u−d p̃ − 1−p̃ , we see that qualitatively, her optimal
strategy involves
> 0 : p > p̃
π̂0 = = 0 : p = p̃
< 0 : p < p̃.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 40 / 161
√
Optimal Investment: U(x) = x
Consider now the same set-up as before, only that the utility function
√
changes to U(x) = x.
It follows that
1 1
U 0 (X̂1 ) =
p
2 X̂1
(38)
1 1
⇒ X̂1 = 2 2
4λ Z
Solving for λ returns
x(1 + r ) = Ẽ[X̂1 ]
= E[Z X̂1 ]
1 1 (39)
=E Z 2 2
4λ Z
1 1
= 2E .
4λ Z
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 41 / 161
√
Optimal Investment: U(x) = x
x(1 + r )
X̂1 =
Z 2 E Z1
q "s #
x(1 + r )
⇒ u(x) = E X̂1 = E (40)
Z 2 E Z1
s
p 1
= x(1 + r ) E .
Z
Question: Is it true for all (p, p̃) ∈ (0, 1) × (0, 1) that
s s
1 p 2 (1 − p)2
E = + ≥ 1? (41)
Z p̃ 1 − p̃
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 42 / 161
Optimal Betting at the Omega Horse Track!
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 43 / 161
Optimal Betting at the Omega Horse Track!
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 44 / 161
Optimal Betting at the Omega Horse Track!
Her optimal strategy X̂1 reflects her betting strategy, and satisfies
X0
X̂1 (ω) =
Z (ω)
! (47)
X̂1 (ω1 ) X̂1 (ω2 ) X̂3 (ω1 ) 6 7 1
∴ , , = , , .
X0 X0 X0 5 6 4
So, per dollar of wealth, she buys 65 of a bet for Horse 1 to win, 7
6 of
a bet for Horse 2 to win, and 14 of a bet for Horse 3 to win.
The total price (per dollar of wealth) is thus
6 7 1
· 0.5 + · 0.3 + · 0.2 = 0.6 + 0.35 + 0.05 = 1. (48)
5 6 4
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 45 / 161
Dividends
What about dividends? How do they affect the risk neutral pricing of
exchange and non-exchange traded assets? What if they are paid at
discrete times? Continuously paid?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 46 / 161
Dividends
What about dividends? How do they affect the risk neutral pricing of
exchange and non-exchange traded assets? What if they are paid at
discrete times? Continuously paid?
Recall that if dividends are paid continuously at rate δ, then 1 share at
time 0 will accumulate to e δT shares upon reinvestment of dividends into
the stock until time T .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 46 / 161
Dividends
What about dividends? How do they affect the risk neutral pricing of
exchange and non-exchange traded assets? What if they are paid at
discrete times? Continuously paid?
Recall that if dividends are paid continuously at rate δ, then 1 share at
time 0 will accumulate to e δT shares upon reinvestment of dividends into
the stock until time T .
It follows that to deliver one share of stock S with initial price S0 at time
T , only e −δT shares are needed. Correspondingly,
Fprepaid = e −δT S0
(49)
F = e rT e −δT S0 = e (r −δ)T S0 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 46 / 161
Binomial Option Pricing w/ cts Dividends and Interest
Over a period of length h, interest increases the value of a bond by a
factor e rh and dividends the value of a stock by a factor of e δh .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 47 / 161
Binomial Option Pricing w/ cts Dividends and Interest
Over a period of length h, interest increases the value of a bond by a
factor e rh and dividends the value of a stock by a factor of e δh .
Once again, we compute pathwise,
V1 (H) − V1 (T )
∆0 = e −δh
(u − d)S0
e (r −δ)h − d
p̃ =
u−d
u − e (r −δ)h
q̃ =
u−d
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 47 / 161
Binomial Models w/ cts Dividends and Interest
For σ, the annualized standard deviation of continuously compounded
stock return, the following models hold:
Futures - Cox (1979)
√
u = eσ h
√
d = e −σ h
.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 49 / 161
1- and 2-period pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 49 / 161
Calibration Exercise
Assume table below of realized gains & losses over a ten-period cycle.
Use the adjusted values (r , δ, h, S0 , K ) = (0.02, 0, 0.10, 10, 10).
Calculate binary options from last slide using these assumptions.
Period Return
S1
1 S0 = 1.05
S2
2 S1 = 1.02
S3
3 S2 = 0.98
S4
4 S3 = 1.01
S5
5 S4 = 1.02
S6
6 S5 = 0.99
S7
7 S6 = 1.03
S8
8 S7 = 1.05
S9
9 S8 = 0.96
S10
10 S9 = 0.97
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 50 / 161
Calibration Exercise: Linear Approximation
Si
We would like to compute σ for the logarithm of returns ln Si−1 .
Assume the returns per period are all independent.
Q: Can we use a linear (simple) return model instead of a compound
return model as an approximation?
If so, then for our observed simple return rate values:
Calculate the sample variance σ∗2 .
σ∗
Estimate that σ ≈ √ h
.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 51 / 161
Calibration Exercise: Linear Approximation
Si
Note that if Si−1 = 1 + γ for γ 1, then
Si Si − Si−1
ln ≈γ= . (50)
Si−1 Si−1
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 52 / 161
Calibration Exercise: Linear Approximation
Our returns table now looks like
Period Return
S1 −S0
1 S0 = 0.05
S2 −S1
2 S1 = 0.02
S3 −S2
3 S2 = −0.02
S4 −S3
4 S3 = 0.01
S5 −S4
5 S4 = 0.02
S6 −S5
6 S5 = −0.01
S7 −S6
7 S6 = 0.03
S8 −S7
8 S7 = 0.05
S9 −S8
9 S8 = −0.04
S10 −S9
10 S9 = −0.03
sample standard deviation σ∗ = 0.0319
estimated return deviation σ ≈ 0.1001
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 53 / 161
Calibration Exercise: Linear Approximation
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 54 / 161
Calibration Exercise: Linear Approximation
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 55 / 161
Calibration Exercise: Linear Approximation
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 55 / 161
Calibration Exercise: No Approximation
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 56 / 161
Calibration Exercise: No Approximation
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 56 / 161
1- and 2-period pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 57 / 161
1- and 2-period pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 57 / 161
1- and 2-period pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 57 / 161
Risk Neutral Pricing Formula
Assume now that we have the ”regular assumptions” on our coin flip
space, and that at time N we are asked to deliver a path dependent
derivative value VN . Then for times 0 ≤ n ≤ N, the value of this
derivative is computed via
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 58 / 161
Risk Neutral Pricing Formula
Assume now that we have the ”regular assumptions” on our coin flip
space, and that at time N we are asked to deliver a path dependent
derivative value VN . Then for times 0 ≤ n ≤ N, the value of this
derivative is computed via
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 58 / 161
Risk Neutral Pricing Formula
Assume now that we have the ”regular assumptions” on our coin flip
space, and that at time N we are asked to deliver a path dependent
derivative value VN . Then for times 0 ≤ n ≤ N, the value of this
derivative is computed via
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 58 / 161
Risk Neutral Pricing Formula
Assume now that we have the ”regular assumptions” on our coin flip
space, and that at time N we are asked to deliver a path dependent
derivative value VN . Then for times 0 ≤ n ≤ N, the value of this
derivative is computed via
X0 = Ẽ0 [XN ]
Vn (60)
Xn := nh .
e
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 58 / 161
Computational Complexity
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 59 / 161
Computational Complexity
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 60 / 161
An Example:
It follows that
v3 (32) = 0
v3 (8) = 2
(64)
v3 (2) = 8
v3 (0.50) = 9.50.
Compute V0 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 61 / 161
Markov Processes
If we use the above approach for a more exotic option, say a lookback
option that pays the maximum over the term of a stock, then we find
this approach lacking.
There is not enough information in the tree or the distinct values for
S3 as stated. We need more.
Consider our general multi-period binomial model under P̃.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 62 / 161
Markov Processes
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 63 / 161
Markov Processes
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 64 / 161
Call Options on Zero-Coupon Bonds
r0 = 0.02
rn+1 = Xrn (68)
1
P̃[X = 2k ] = for k ∈ {−1, 0, 1} .
3
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 65 / 161
Call Options on Zero-Coupon Bonds
Compute (B0 , C0 ).
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 66 / 161
Call Options on Zero-Coupon Bonds
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 67 / 161
Call Options on Zero-Coupon Bonds
r2 B2 C2
0.08 92.59 0
0.04 96.15 0
0.02 98.04 1.04
0.01 99.01 2.01
0.005 99.50 2.50
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 68 / 161
Call Options on Zero-Coupon Bonds
Our associated Bond and Call Option values at time 1:
r1 B1 C1
0.04 91.92 0.33
0.02 95.82 1.00
0.01 97.87 1.83
r0 B0 C0
0.02 93.34 1.03
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 70 / 161
Capital Structure Model
With all of this information, your job now is to issue a Buy or Sell on
the stock and the bond issued by this company.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 71 / 161
Capital Structure Model
Table of return on assets for Company X, with h = 0.25.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 72 / 161
Capital Structure Model
We scale all of our calculation in terms of billions ($, shares, bonds).
Using the Futures- Cox model, we have
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 74 / 161
The Interview Process
Questions:
How should you interview?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 75 / 161
The Interview Process
Questions:
How should you interview?
Specifically, when should you accept an offer and cancel the
remaining interviews?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 75 / 161
The Interview Process
Questions:
How should you interview?
Specifically, when should you accept an offer and cancel the
remaining interviews?
How does your strategy change if you can interview as many times as
you like, but the distribution of offers remains the same as above?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 75 / 161
The Interview Process: Strategy
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 76 / 161
The Interview Process: Optimal Strategy
At time 4, the value of this game is X4 (s) = s, with s being the salary
offered.
At time 3, the conditional expected value of this game is
h i
Ẽ X4 | 3rd offer = s = Ẽ[X4 ]
= 0.1 × 50, 000 + 0.3 × 70, 000 (79)
+ 0.4 × 80, 000 + 0.2 × 100, 000
= 78, 000.
Hence, one should accept an offer of 80, 000 or 100, 000, and reject
the other two.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 77 / 161
The Interview Process: Optimal Strategy
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 78 / 161
The Interview Process: Optimal Strategy
At time 1,
X1 (50, 000) = 86, 560
X1 (70, 000) = 86, 560
(82)
X1 (80, 000) = 86, 560
X1 (100, 000) = 100, 000.
Finally, at time 0, the value of this optimal strategy is
Ẽ0 [X1 ] = Ẽ[X1 ] = 0.8 × 86, 560 + 0.2 × 100, 000 = 89, 248. (83)
So, the optimal strategy is, for the first two interviews, accept only an
offer of 100, 000. If after the third interview, and offer of 80, 000 or
100, 000 is made, then accept. Otherwise continue to the last interview
where you should accept whatever is offered.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 79 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Review
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 80 / 161
Early Exercise
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 81 / 161
For Freedom! (we must charge extra...)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 82 / 161
For Freedom! (we must charge extra...)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 82 / 161
For Freedom! (we must charge extra...)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 82 / 161
American Options
In the end, the option v is valued after the nth value of the stock
Sn (ω) = s is revealed via the recursive formula along each path ω:
n h io
vn (Sn (ω)) = max g (Sn (ω)), e −rh Ẽ v (Sn+1 (ω)) | Sn (ω)
(86)
τ ∗ (ω) = inf {k ∈ {0, 1, .., N} | vk (Sk (ω)) = g (Sk (ω))} .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 83 / 161
American Options
Some examples:
”American Bond:” g (s) = 1
”American Digital Option:” g (s) = 1{6≤s≤10}
”American Square Option:” g (s) = s 2 .
Does an investor exercise any of these options early? Consider again the
setting
1 9
p̃ = = q̃, e −rh =
2 10 (88)
1
S0 = 4, u = 2, d = .
2
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 84 / 161
American Square Options
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 85 / 161
American Square Options
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 86 / 161
American Options
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 87 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
Consider again a series of coin flips (ω1 , ..., ωn ) where at time n, the
interest rate from n to n + 1 is modeled via
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 88 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
Futhermore, we can define the yield rate y (t, T , r (t)) for a zero-coupon
bond B(t, T , r (t)) via
1
B(t, T , r (t)) = (95)
(1 + y (t, T , r (t)))T −t
and the corresponding yield rate volatility
1 y (1, n, r1 (H))
σ̃n = ln . (96)
2 y (1, n, r1 (T ))
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 89 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 90 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
1
Black, Fischer, Emanuel Derman, and William Toy. ”A one-factor model
of interest rates and its application to treasury bond options.” Financial
Analysts Journal 46.1 (1990): 33-39.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 91 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 92 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
From time t = 0 to t = 2, again with our initial rate r0 = r ,
Connecting our observed two-year yield with yearly interest rates
returns
1 1 1 1 1 1
= +
(1 + y (0, 2, r ))2 1 + r 2 1 + r1 (H) 2 1 + r1 (T )
(100)
1 1 1 1 1 1
⇒ = + .
1.112 1.10 2 1 + r1 (H) 2 1 + r1 (T )
Also, connecting our one-year yields with yearly interest rates leads to
1 r1 (H) 1 y (1, 2, r1 (H))
σ1 = ln = ln
2 r1 (T ) 2 y (1, 2, r1 (T )) (101)
= σ̃2 = 0.190.
Solution leads to the pair
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 94 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 95 / 161
Matching Interest Rates to Market Conditions
1 1 1 1 1 1
= +
(1 + y (1, 3, r1 (H))2 1 + r1 (H) 2 1 + r2 (H, H) 2 1 + r2 (H, T )
1 1 1 1 1 1
= + .
(1 + y (1, 3, r1 (T ))2 1 + r1 (T ) 2 1 + r2 (T , H) 2 1 + r2 (T , T )
(106)
Now solve for (r2 (H, H), r2 (H, T ), r2 (T , T ))!!
HW1: Price a bond that matures in two years, with the above
observations for term structure, and with F = 100 and coupon rate 10%.
HW2: What about r3 , r4 , r5 ? Can we compute them?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 96 / 161
Pricing a Two-year Coupon Bond Using Market Conditions
Consider the previous observations for term structure, and a bond with
F = 100 and coupon rate 10%. In this setting, we have
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 97 / 161
Pricing a Two-year Coupon Bond Using Market Conditions
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 98 / 161
Pricing a Two-year Coupon Bond Using Market Conditions
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 99 / 161
Pricing a Two-year Coupon Bond Using Market Conditions
Note: Note that with our coupons, the yield yc (0, 2, r ) = 0.1095, which is
obtained by solving
10 110
98.37 = + . (108)
1 + yc (0, 2, r ) (1 + yc (0, 2, r ))2
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 100 / 161
Pricing a 1-year Call Option on our 2-year Coupon Bond
Consider the previous term structure, and a European Call Option on the
two year bond with K = 97 and expiry of 1 year.
Compute the initial Call price C0 (r ).
Compute the initial number of bonds to hold to replicate this option.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 101 / 161
Pricing a 1-year Call Option on our 2-year Coupon Bond
In this case, we look at the price of the bond minus the accrued interest:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 103 / 161
Asian Options
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 103 / 161
Asian Options
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 103 / 161
Asian Options
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 103 / 161
Asian Options: An Example:
Notice that these are path-dependent options, unlike the put and call
options that we have studied until now. Assume r , δ, and h are such that
1 9
S0 = 4, u = 2, d = , e −rh =
2 10 (110)
g (I ) = max {I − 2.5, 0} .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 104 / 161
Asian Options: An Example:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 105 / 161
Asian Options: An Example:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 105 / 161
Asian Options: An Example:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 105 / 161
Lognormality
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 106 / 161
Lognormality
T −t
Partition the interval [t, T ] into n intervals of length h = n , then:
The return over the entire period can be taken as the sum of the
returns over each interval:
n
!
ST (ω) X
rt,T −t (ω) = ln = rtk ,h (ω)
St (ω) (113)
k=1
tk = t + kh.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 107 / 161
Binomial Tree and Discrete Dividends
Another issue encountered in elementary credit and investment theory
is the case of different compounding and deposit periods.
This also occurs in the financial setting where a dividend is not paid
continuously, but rather at specific times.
It follows that the dividend can be modeled as delivered in the middle
of a binomial period, at time τ (ω) < T .
This view is due to Schroder and can be summarized as viewing the
inherent value of St (ω) as the sum of a prepaid forward PF and the
present value of the upcoming dividend payment D:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 109 / 161
Back to the Continuous Time Case
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 109 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 110 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 110 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
For a European option with time expiry T , we can simulate the expiry
time payoff mulitple times:
1 2
√ (i)
V S (i) , T = G S (i) = G S0 e (α−δ− 2 σ )T +σ T Z . (116)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 110 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
n on
If we sample uniformly from our simulated values V S (i) , T we
i=1
can appeal to a sampling-convergence theorem with the appoximation
n
−rT 1 X (i)
V (S, 0) = e V S ,T . (117)
n
i=1
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 111 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
n on
If we sample uniformly from our simulated values V S (i) , T we
i=1
can appeal to a sampling-convergence theorem with the appoximation
n
−rT 1 X (i)
V (S, 0) = e V S ,T . (117)
n
i=1
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 111 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
n on
If we sample uniformly from our simulated values V S (i) , T we
i=1
can appeal to a sampling-convergence theorem with the appoximation
n
−rT 1 X (i)
V (S, 0) = e V S ,T . (117)
n
i=1
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 111 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
n on
If we sample uniformly from our simulated values V S (i) , T we
i=1
can appeal to a sampling-convergence theorem with the appoximation
n
−rT 1 X (i)
V (S, 0) = e V S ,T . (117)
n
i=1
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 111 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 112 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
It follows that one can now map U → Z via inversion of the Nornal cdf N:
Z = N −1 (U). (118)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 112 / 161
Monte Carlo Techniques
It follows that one can now map U → Z via inversion of the Nornal cdf N:
Z = N −1 (U). (118)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 112 / 161
Black Scholes Pricing using Underlying Asset
In the next course, we will derive the following solutions to the
Black-Scholes PDE:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 114 / 161
Lognormal Random Variables
We say that Y ∼ LN(µ, σ) is Lognormal if ln(Y ) ∼ N(µ, σ 2 ).
As sums of normal random variables remain normal, products of lognormal
random variables remain lognormal.
Recall that the moment-generating function of
X ∼ N(µ, σ 2 ) ∼ µ + σN(0, 1) is
1 2t2
MX (t) = E[e tX ] = e µt+ 2 σ (121)
If Y = e µ+σZ , then, it can be seen that
1 2 n2
E[Y n ] = E[e nX ] = e µn+ 2 σ (122)
and
!
1 (ln(y ) − µ)2
fY (y ) = √ exp − (123)
σ 2πy 2σ 2
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 114 / 161
Stock Evolution and Lognormal Random Variables
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 115 / 161
Stock Evolution and Lognormal Random Variables
E[St ] = S0 e (α−δ)t
!
ln SK0 + (α − δ − 0.5σ 2 )t (125)
P[St > K ] = N √ .
σ t
Note that under the risk-neutral measure P̃, we exchange α with r , the
risk-free rate:
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 116 / 161
Stock Evolution and Lognormal Random Variables
E[St ] = S0 e (α−δ)t
!
ln SK0 + (α − δ − 0.5σ 2 )t (125)
P[St > K ] = N √ .
σ t
Note that under the risk-neutral measure P̃, we exchange α with r , the
risk-free rate:
Ẽ[St ] = S0 e (r −δ)t
(126)
P̃[St > K ] = N(d2 ).
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 116 / 161
Stock Evolution and Lognormal Random Variables
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 117 / 161
Stock Evolution and Lognormal Random Variables
In our case,
" #
1 2
√
E S0 e (α−δ− 2 σ )t+σ tZ 1 (α−δ− 1 σ2 )t+σ√tZ
S0 e 2 >K
E[St | St > K ] = h 1 2
√ i
P S0 e (α−δ− 2 σ )t+σ tZ > K
!
S0
ln +(α−δ+0.5σ 2 )t
N K √
σ t
= S0 e (α−δ)t !
S0
ln +(α−δ−0.5σ 2 )t
N K √
σ t
N(d1 )
⇒ Ẽ[St | St > K ] = S0 e (r −δ)t
N(d2 )
(128)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 118 / 161
Stock Evolution and Lognormal Random Variables
In fact, we can use this CTE framework to solve for the European Call
option price in the Black-Scholes framework, where P̃0 [A] = P̃[A | S0 = S]
and
h i
V C (S, 0) := e −rT Ẽ (ST − K )+ | S0 = S
h i
= e −rT Ẽ0 ST − K | ST > K · P̃0 [ST > K ]
h i
= e −rT Ẽ0 ST | ST > K · P̃0 [ST > K ] − Ke −rT P̃0 [ST > K ]
N(d1 )
= e −rT Se (r −δ)T · N(d2 ) − Ke −rT N(d2 )
N(d2 )
= Se −δT N(d1 ) − Ke −rT N(d2 ).
(129)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 119 / 161
Black Scholes Analysis: Option Greeks
For any option price V (S, t), define its various sensitivities as follows:
∂V
∆=
∂S
∂∆ ∂2V
Γ= =
∂S ∂S 2
∂V
ν=
∂σ (130)
∂V
Θ=
∂t
∂V
ρ=
∂r
∂V
Ψ= .
∂δ
These are known accordingly as the Option Greeks.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 120 / 161
Black Scholes Analysis: Option Greeks
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 121 / 161
Black Scholes Analysis: Option Greeks
as well as..
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 122 / 161
Black Scholes Analysis: Option Greeks
as well as..
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 122 / 161
Option Elasticity
Define
V (S+,t)−V (s,t)
V (S,t)
Ω(S, t) := lim S+−S
→0
S
S V (S + , t) − V (s, t) (133)
= lim
V (S, t) →0 S +−S
∆·S
= .
V (S, t)
Consequently,
∆C · S Se −δ(T −t)
ΩC (S, t) = = ≥1
V C (S, t) Se −δ(T −t) − Ke −r (T −t) N(d2 )
(134)
∆P · S
ΩP (S, t) = P ≤ 0.
V (S, t)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 123 / 161
Option Elasticity
Theorem
The volatility of an option is the option elasticity times the volatility of the
stock:
The proof comes from Finan: Consider the strategy of hedging a portfolio
of shorting an option and purchasing ∆ = ∂V ∂S shares.
The initial and final values of this portfolio are
Initally: V (S(t), t) − ∆(S(t), t) · S(t)
Finally: V (S(T ), T ) − ∆(S(t), t) · S(T )
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 124 / 161
Option Elasticity
Proof.
If this portfolio is self-financing and arbitrage-free requirement, then
e r (T −t) V (S(t), t) − ∆(S(t), t) · S(t) = V (S(T ), T ) − ∆(S(t), t) · S(T ).
(136)
It follows that for κ := e r (T −t) ,
" #
V (S(T ), T ) − V (S(t), t) S(T ) − S(t)
=κ−1+ +1−κ Ω
V (S(t), t) S(t)
" # " #
V (S(T ), T ) − V (S(t), t) 2 S(T ) − S(t) (137)
⇒ Var = Ω Var
V (S(t), t) S(t)
⇒ σoption = σstock × | Ω | .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 125 / 161
Option Elasticity
If γ is the expected rate of return on an option with value V , α is the
expected rate of return on the underlying stock, and r is of course the risk
free rate, then the following equation holds:
γ · V (S, t) = α · ∆(S, t) · S + r · V (S, t) − ∆(S, t) · S . (138)
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 126 / 161
Option Elasticity
If γ is the expected rate of return on an option with value V , α is the
expected rate of return on the underlying stock, and r is of course the risk
free rate, then the following equation holds:
γ · V (S, t) = α · ∆(S, t) · S + r · V (S, t) − ∆(S, t) · S . (138)
(α − r ) (α − r )Ω
Sharpe(Stock) = = = Sharpe(Call). (140)
σ σΩ
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 126 / 161
Option Elasticity
If γ is the expected rate of return on an option with value V , α is the
expected rate of return on the underlying stock, and r is of course the risk
free rate, then the following equation holds:
γ · V (S, t) = α · ∆(S, t) · S + r · V (S, t) − ∆(S, t) · S . (138)
(α − r ) (α − r )Ω
Sharpe(Stock) = = = Sharpe(Call). (140)
σ σΩ
HW Sharpe Ratio for a put? How about elasticity for a portfolio of
options? Now read about Calendar Spreads, Implied Volatility, and
Perpetual American Options.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 126 / 161
Example: Hedging
S0 = 10 = K
σ = 0.2 (141)
r = 0.02.
Calculate the initial number of shares of the stock for your hedging
program.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 127 / 161
Example: Hedging
Recall
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 128 / 161
Example: Risk Analysis
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 129 / 161
Example: Risk Analysis
By definition,
∆·S S · ∂V∂S
(S,t)
Ω(S, t) = =
V (S, t) V (S, t)
d
S dS (S 2 e S ) S · (2Se S + S 2 e S ) (144)
= =
(S 2 e S ) S 2e S
= 2 + S.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 130 / 161
Example: Risk Analysis
By definition,
∆·S S · ∂V∂S
(S,t)
Ω(S, t) = =
V (S, t) V (S, t)
d
S dS (S 2 e S ) S · (2Se S + S 2 e S ) (144)
= =
(S 2 e S ) S 2e S
= 2 + S.
Furthermore, since Ω = 2 + S ≥ 2, we have
0.10 − 0.05
Sharpe = = 0.25. (145)
0.20
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 130 / 161
Example: Black Scholes Pricing
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 131 / 161
Example: Black Scholes Pricing
In this case,
V = VC + VP
∂2 C (146)
P
Γ= V + V = 2ΓC .
∂S 2
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 131 / 161
Example: Black Scholes Pricing
√
Consequently, d1 = 0.4 and d2 = 0.4 − 0.2 4 = 0, and so
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 132 / 161
Market Making
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 133 / 161
Market Making
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 134 / 161
Market Making
Define
∂Si = Si+1 − Si
∂Pi = Pi+1 − Pi (150)
∂∆i = ∆i+1 − ∆i
Then
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 135 / 161
Market Making
∂V
For a continuous rate r , we can see that if ∆ := ∂S , Pt = ∆t St − Vt ,
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 136 / 161
Market Making
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 137 / 161
Market Making
If dSt · dSt = σ 2 St2 dt, then if we sample continuously and enforce a zero
net-flow, we retain the BSM PDE for all relevant (S, t):
∂V ∂V 1 2 2 ∂2V
+r S −V + σ S =0
∂t ∂S 2 ∂S 2 (153)
V (S, T ) = G (S) for final time payoff G (S).
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 137 / 161
Note: Delta-Gamma Neutrality vs Bond Immunization
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 138 / 161
Option Greeks and Analysis - Some Final Comments
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 139 / 161
Exam Practice
Consider an economy where :
The current exchange rate is x0 = 0.011 dollar
yen .
A four-year dollar-denominated European put option on yen with a
strike price of 0.008$ sells for 0.0005$.
The continuously compounded risk-free interest rate on dollars is 3%.
The continuously compounded risk-free interest rate on yen is 1.5%.
Compute the price of a 4−year dollar-denominated European call option
on yens with a strike price of 0.008$.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 140 / 161
Exam Practice
Consider an economy where :
The current exchange rate is x0 = 0.011 dollar
yen .
A four-year dollar-denominated European put option on yen with a
strike price of 0.008$ sells for 0.0005$.
The continuously compounded risk-free interest rate on dollars is 3%.
The continuously compounded risk-free interest rate on yen is 1.5%.
Compute the price of a 4−year dollar-denominated European call option
on yens with a strike price of 0.008$.
ANSWER: By put call parity, and the Black Scholes formula, with the
asset S as the exchange rate, and the foreign risk-free rate rf = δ,
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 140 / 161
Exam Practice
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 141 / 161
Exam Practice
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 141 / 161
Exam Practice
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 142 / 161
Exam Practice
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 142 / 161
Exam Practice
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 142 / 161
Exam Practice
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 142 / 161
Exam Pointers
When reviewing the material for the exam, consider the following
milestones and examples:
The definition of the Black-Scholes pricing formulae for European
puts and calls.
What are the Greeks? Given a specific option, could you compute the
Greeks?
What is the Option Elasticity? How is it useful? How about the
Sharpe ratio of an option? Can you compute the Elasticity and
Sharpe ration of a given option?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 143 / 161
Exam Pointers
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 144 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define the finite set of outcomes, the Sample Space, as Ω and any
subcollection of outcomes A ⊂ Ω an event.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 145 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define the finite set of outcomes, the Sample Space, as Ω and any
subcollection of outcomes A ⊂ Ω an event.
How does this relate to the case of 2 consecutive coin flips
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 145 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define the finite set of outcomes, the Sample Space, as Ω and any
subcollection of outcomes A ⊂ Ω an event.
How does this relate to the case of 2 consecutive coin flips
Ω ≡ {HH, HT , TH, TT }
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 145 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define the finite set of outcomes, the Sample Space, as Ω and any
subcollection of outcomes A ⊂ Ω an event.
How does this relate to the case of 2 consecutive coin flips
Ω ≡ {HH, HT , TH, TT }
Set of events includes statements like at least one head
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 145 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define the finite set of outcomes, the Sample Space, as Ω and any
subcollection of outcomes A ⊂ Ω an event.
How does this relate to the case of 2 consecutive coin flips
Ω ≡ {HH, HT , TH, TT }
Set of events includes statements like at least one head
= {HH, HT , TH}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 145 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define, ∀A, B ⊆ Ω
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 146 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define, ∀A, B ⊆ Ω
Ac = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈
/ A}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 146 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define, ∀A, B ⊆ Ω
Ac = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈
/ A}
A ∩ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A and ω ∈ B}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 146 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define, ∀A, B ⊆ Ω
Ac = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈
/ A}
A ∩ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A and ω ∈ B}
A ∪ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A or ω ∈ B}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 146 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define, ∀A, B ⊆ Ω
Ac = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈
/ A}
A ∩ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A and ω ∈ B}
A ∪ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A or ω ∈ B}
φ as the Empty Set
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 146 / 161
Probability Spaces - Introduction
We define, ∀A, B ⊆ Ω
Ac = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈
/ A}
A ∩ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A and ω ∈ B}
A ∪ B = {ω ∈ Ω : ω ∈ A or ω ∈ B}
φ as the Empty Set
A, B to be Mutually Exclusive or Disjoint if A ∩ B = φ
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 146 / 161
σ−algebras
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Some Examples
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Some Examples
F0 = {∅, Ω}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Some Examples
F0 = {∅, Ω}
F1 = {∅, Ω, {HH, HT }, {TT , TH}}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Some Examples
F0 = {∅, Ω}
F1 = {∅, Ω, {HH, HT }, {TT , TH}}
F2 = {∅, Ω, {HH}, {HT }, {TT }, {TH}, ....}
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
σ−algebras
Some Examples
F0 = {∅, Ω}
F1 = {∅, Ω, {HH, HT }, {TT , TH}}
F2 = {∅, Ω, {HH}, {HT }, {TT }, {TH}, ....}
F2 is completed by taking all unions of ∅, Ω, {HH}, {HT }, {TT }, {TH}.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 147 / 161
Power Sets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 148 / 161
Power Sets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 148 / 161
Power Sets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 148 / 161
Power Sets
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 148 / 161
Notice that F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 149 / 161
Notice that F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 149 / 161
Notice that F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 149 / 161
Notice that F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 149 / 161
Notice that F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 149 / 161
Notice that F0 ⊂ F1 ⊂ F2 .
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 149 / 161
Given a pair (Ω, F), we define a Probability Space as the triple
(Ω, F, P), where
P : F → [0, 1]
P[∅] = 0
For any countable disjoint sets A1 , A2 , ... ∈ F
P∞
P [∪∞
n=1 An ] = n=1 P[An ]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 150 / 161
And so
P
P[A] := P[ω]
Pω∈A
E[X ] := ω X (ω)P[ω] = nk=1 xk P[{X (ω) = xk }]
P
h i
with Variance := E (X − E[X ])2
Some useful properties:
P[Ac ] = 1 − P[A]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 151 / 161
And so
P
P[A] := P[ω]
Pω∈A
E[X ] := ω X (ω)P[ω] = nk=1 xk P[{X (ω) = xk }]
P
h i
with Variance := E (X − E[X ])2
Some useful properties:
P[Ac ] = 1 − P[A]
P[A] ≤ 1
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 151 / 161
And so
P
P[A] := P[ω]
Pω∈A
E[X ] := ω X (ω)P[ω] = nk=1 xk P[{X (ω) = xk }]
P
h i
with Variance := E (X − E[X ])2
Some useful properties:
P[Ac ] = 1 − P[A]
P[A] ≤ 1
P[A ∪ B] = P[A] + P[B] − P[A ∩ B]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 151 / 161
And so
P
P[A] := P[ω]
Pω∈A
E[X ] := ω X (ω)P[ω] = nk=1 xk P[{X (ω) = xk }]
P
h i
with Variance := E (X − E[X ])2
Some useful properties:
P[Ac ] = 1 − P[A]
P[A] ≤ 1
P[A ∪ B] = P[A] + P[B] − P[A ∩ B]
P[A ∪ B ∪ C ] =
P[A] + P[B] + P[C ] − P[A ∩ B] − P[A ∩ C ] − P[B ∩ C ] + P[A ∩ B ∩ C ]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 151 / 161
Example
Consider the case where two dice are rolled separately. What is the Sample
Space Ω here? How about the probability that the dots on the faces of the
pair add up to 3 or 4 or 5?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 152 / 161
How Should We Count?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 153 / 161
Examples
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 154 / 161
Examples
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 154 / 161
Permutations
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 155 / 161
Permutations
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 155 / 161
Permutations
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 155 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Consider the case where two events in our σ−field are under consideration.
In fact, we know that B has already happened. How does that affect the
chances of A happening?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 156 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Consider the case where two events in our σ−field are under consideration.
In fact, we know that B has already happened. How does that affect the
chances of A happening?
For example, if you know your friend has one boy, and the chance of a boy
or girl is equal at 0.5, then what is the chance all three of his children are
boys?
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 156 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
In symbols, we seek
P [A ∩ B]
P [A | B] ≡
P [B]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 157 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
In symbols, we seek
P [A ∩ B]
P [A | B] ≡
P [B]
P [ all are boys ∩ first child is a boy]
=
P [ first child is a boy]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 157 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
In symbols, we seek
P [A ∩ B]
P [A | B] ≡
P [B]
P [ all are boys ∩ first child is a boy]
=
P [ first child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
P [ first child is a boy]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 157 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
In symbols, we seek
P [A ∩ B]
P [A | B] ≡
P [B]
P [ all are boys ∩ first child is a boy]
=
P [ first child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
P [ first child is a boy]
1 1 1
· ·
= 2 21 2
2
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 157 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
In symbols, we seek
P [A ∩ B]
P [A | B] ≡
P [B]
P [ all are boys ∩ first child is a boy]
=
P [ first child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
= (159)
P [ first child is a boy]
1 1 1
· ·
= 2 21 2
2
1
=
4
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 157 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
P [A ∩ C ]
P [A | C ] ≡
P [C ]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
P [A ∩ C ]
P [A | C ] ≡
P [C ]
P [ all are boys ∩ at least one child is a boy]
=
P [at least one child is a boy]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
P [A ∩ C ]
P [A | C ] ≡
P [C ]
P [ all are boys ∩ at least one child is a boy]
=
P [at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
P [ at least one child is a boy]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
P [A ∩ C ]
P [A | C ] ≡
P [C ]
P [ all are boys ∩ at least one child is a boy]
=
P [at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
P [ at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
1 − P [all girls]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
P [A ∩ C ]
P [A | C ] ≡
P [C ]
P [ all are boys ∩ at least one child is a boy]
=
P [at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
P [ at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
1 − P [all girls]
1 1 1
2 · 2 · 2
=
1 − 18
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
What if another event has already occured?
Now, what if you know your friend has at least one boy. Then what is the
chance all three of his children are boys? This is also known as The
Boy-Girl Paradox.
P [A ∩ C ]
P [A | C ] ≡
P [C ]
P [ all are boys ∩ at least one child is a boy]
=
P [at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
= (160)
P [ at least one child is a boy]
P [ all are boys]
=
1 − P [all girls]
1 1 1
2 · 2 · 2 1
= 1
=
1− 8 7
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 158 / 161
Total Probability
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 159 / 161
Total Probability
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 159 / 161
Total Probability
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 159 / 161
Total Probability
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 159 / 161
Bayes Theorem
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 160 / 161
Bayes Theorem
P [Aj ∩ B]
P [Aj | B] = =
P [B]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 160 / 161
Bayes Theorem
P [Aj ∩ B] P [B ∩ Aj ]
P [Aj | B] = =
P [B] P [B]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 160 / 161
Bayes Theorem
P [Aj ∩ B] P [B ∩ Aj ]
P [Aj | B] = =
P [B] P [B]
(163)
P[B | Aj ] · P[Aj ]
=
P[B | A1 ]P[A1 ] + ... + P[B | An ]P[An ]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 160 / 161
Independent Events
For our sample space Ω, assume we have two events A, B. We say that A
and B are independent if P[A | B] = P[A] and dependent if
P[A | B] 6= P[A]
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 161 / 161
Independent Events
For our sample space Ω, assume we have two events A, B. We say that A
and B are independent if P[A | B] = P[A] and dependent if
P[A | B] 6= P[A]
In other words, A and B are independent if and only if
P[A ∩ B] = P[A] · P[B].
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 161 / 161
Independent Events
For our sample space Ω, assume we have two events A, B. We say that A
and B are independent if P[A | B] = P[A] and dependent if
P[A | B] 6= P[A]
In other words, A and B are independent if and only if
P[A ∩ B] = P[A] · P[B].
Generally speaking, for any collection of events {A1 , ..., An } we have for
any subcollection {Ai1 , ..., Ain } ⊆ {A1 , ..., An }
Albert Cohen (MSU) Financial Mathematics for Actuaries I MSU Spring 2016 161 / 161