Republic of Albania

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

Water Resources and Irrigation Project

Project ID P121186

Consultancy Services:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment,
Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys

Photo: Murriz Thana Reservoir

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FRAMEWORK

DOCUMENT (ESFD)

CEIA
 Republic of Albania
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

Water Resources and Irrigation Project

Project ID P121186

Consultancy Services:
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement
Policy and Baseline Surveys

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT

(ESFD)

Date of issue September 2012

Updated October 2017
Version: H
Prepared DAH/
Checked RSS/SPS
Approved BAE
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

i
Table of Contents
Page No

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1

1.1 Legal and Institutional Framework 1-1
1.2 The ESIA process 1-2
1.3 The Project 1-3
1.4 Baseline 1-4
1.5 Environmental Impacts 1-5
1.6 Alternatives 1-6
1.7 Environmental and Social Management Plan 1-7
1.8 Timing and ESMP 1-7
1.9 Public Consultation 1-8

2 INTRODUCTION 2-1
2.1 Preamble 2-1
2.2 Layout and Structure of this Report 2-1

3 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 3-1

3.1 Policy and Legal Framework 3-1
3.2 Regulations and other provisions concerning EIA in Albania 3-5
3.3 Institutional Framework 3-9

4 PROCEDURES FOR ESIA 4-1

4.1 Proposed Screening Process 4-1
4.2 Public Consultation 4-3

5 THE PROPOSED PROJECT 5-1

5.1 Project Objectives 5-1
5.2 Project Components 5-1
5.3 The Project Area 5-3

6 BASELINE DATA 6-1

6.1 Location and General Description 6-1

The Physical Environment 6-1

6.2 Climate 6-2
6.3 Geology 6-4
6.4 Seismic Conditions 6-5
6.5 Topography and Geomorphology 6-6
6.6 Soil Characteristics 6-7
6.7 Surface Hydrology and Groundwater 6-8

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

ii
6.8 Water Quality 6-13

The Biological Environment 6-16

6.9 Protected Areas 6-16
6.10 Flora 6-18
6.11 Fauna 6-19
6.12 Threatened flora and fauna in the Project Area 6-19

The Socio Economic Environment 6-20

6.13 Demography 6-20
6.14 Unemployment and employment 6-23
6.15 Ethnicity, Religion, Education, Health and Currency 6-24
6.16 Land Tenure and Land Use 6-25
6.17 Agricultural Production 6-26
6.18 Livestock 6-31
6.20 Roads 6-31

7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 7-1

7.1 Positive Environmental Impacts 7-1
7.2 Negative Environmental impacts 7-2
7.3 Main environmental issues affecting irrigation 7-4

8 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS 8-1

8.1 Positive Socio-Economic Impacts 8-1
8.2 Negative Socio-Economic Impacts 8-2
8.3 Main socio economic issues affecting irrigation 8-3

9 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 9-1

9.1 The Zero Option 9-1
9.2 The Delayed Project Option 9-1
9.3 Alternative Site-Relocation Option 9-1
9.4 Other Alternatives 9-2

10 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 10-1

10.1 Environmental Mitigation Plan 10-1
10.2 Measures to Improve ESMP 10-22
10.3 Environmental Monitoring Plan 10-24
10.4 Organisation of Monitoring 10-27

11 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS - CAPACITY BUILDING 11-1

11.1 Training 11-1

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

iii
12 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING PROCEDURES 12-1
12.1 Implementation Schedule 12-1
12.2 Reporting procedures 12-1

13 COST ESTIMATES AND SOURCE OF FUNDS 13-1

13.1 Cost Estimates 13-1
13.2 Source of Funds 13-2

14 PUBLIC CONSULTATION 14-1

14.1 Identifying Stakeholders 14-1
14.2 Consultation Strategy 14-1
14.3 Level of Engagement 14-2
14.4 Points Raised from Public Consultation meetings 14-2
14.5 Resettlement Policy Framework 14-3

15 ANNEXES 15-1
15.1 Annex A1 Questionnaire for EU Candidature Point 54 For PPP 15-1
15.2 Annex A2 List of Pesticides permitted- not permitted for import into Albania 15-
8
15.3 Annex B - Environmental Screening Procedures 15-10
15.4 Annex C - Details of Public Consultation and Questionnaires 15-15
15.5 Annex D - Further details on Protected Areas 15-32

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

iv
List of Figures
Page No

Figure 5-1: Location of the Project Area.............................................................................................. 5-4

Figure 5-2 Aerial View of Tregtan 2 Reservoir....................................................................................5-8
Figure 5-3 Aerial View of Tregtan 3 Reservoir....................................................................................5-9
Figure 5-4 Aerial View of Vranisht 2 Reservoir.................................................................................5-10
Figure 5-5 Aerial View of TPlan Reservoir....................................................................................... 5-11
Figure 5-6 Aerial View of Leminot Reservoir.................................................................................... 5-12
Figure 5-7 Aerial View of Koshnica 1 Reservoir................................................................................ 5-13
Figure 5-8 Aerial View of Staravecke Reservoir................................................................................5-14
Figure 5-9 Aerial View of Strum and Kurjan Reservoir.....................................................................5-15
Figure 5-10 Aerial View of Slanica Reservoir.................................................................................... 5-16
Figure 5-11 Aerial View of Duhanas Reservoir.................................................................................. 5-17
Figure 5-12 Aerial View of Belesova Reservoir................................................................................. 5-19
Figure 5-13 Aerial View of Murriz Thana Reservoir..........................................................................5-20
Figure 5-14 Aerial View of Zharrez Reservoir................................................................................... 5-22
Figure 6-1: Location of dam and I&D sites in relation to seismic hazard probability..........................6-6
Figure 6-2: Location of dam and I&D sites in relation to river basins.................................................6-9
Figure 6-3: Location of the Project sites in relation to protected areas..............................................6-17
Figure 12-1: Construction Schedule from I&D Project (months taken from Feasibility Studies)......12-2
Figure 14-1: Spectrum of Engagement............................................................................................... 14-2

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

v
List of Tables
Page No
Table 4-1: Proposed Screening Criteria for World Bank and Albanian EA Procedures........................4-1
Table 5-1: Details on the Location and Statistics of Dams and proposed I&D areas...........................5-5
Table 5-2: Summarised Data on Irrigation and Drainage Schemes......................................................5-6
Table 5-3: Tabulated data on Group 1 reservoirs and I&D schemes....................................................5-7
Table 5-4: Tabulated data on Group 2 reservoirs and I&D schemes...................................................5-11
Table 5-5: Tabulated data on Group 3 reservoirs and I&D schemes..................................................5-13
Table 5-6: Details on the current condition of dams and reservoirs...................................................5-24
Table 5-7: Details on the main rehabilitation works proposed on dams and reservoirs......................5-26
Table 6-1: General Data on Climate for Dam and Reservoir I&D Schemes Sites................................6-3
Table 6-2: Calculated Seismic Parameters for dams.............................................................................6-5
Table 6-3: Soil Erosion in River Basins in Albania..............................................................................6-8
Table 6-4: General Hydrological Characteristics of the Drini and Buna Rivers.................................6-10
Table 6-5: Gauging Stations within Drin and Seman catchments and major flood events.................6-11
Table 6-6: Average Monthly Discharge on the Drini and Seman Rivers............................................6-11
Table 6-7: Water Quality Results from Drini River 2007-2010..........................................................6-14
Table 6-8: Water Quality from the Seman River................................................................................6-14
Table 6-9: Water Quality Results from Seman River 2007-2010.......................................................6-15
Table 6-10: Details of Protected areas in Albania............................................................................... 6-16
Table 6-11: Details of Protected areas in Districts containing reservoirs under the study..................6-18
Table 6-12: Natural demographic structure of the Districts................................................................6-21
Table 6-13: Migration within the Districts......................................................................................... 6-21
Table 6-14: Population and Families within the Districts...................................................................6-22
Table 6-15: Average Farm Size and numbers of families within the schemes....................................6-23
Table 6-16: Unemployment within the Districts................................................................................. 6-24
Table 6-17: Unemployment within the Districts................................................................................. 6-24
Table 6-18: Health Facilities within the Districts...............................................................................6-25
Table 6-19: Land Use within the Districts.......................................................................................... 6-25
Table 6-20: Aggregated Structure of Cropped Area within all Schemes............................................6-26
Table 6-21: Current crop pattern and intensity within all Schemes....................................................6-27
Table 6-22: Current crop pattern and intensity within all Schemes....................................................6-28
Table 6-23: Average amounts of Chemical Fertiliser and Pesticide Use by District (kv/farm)..........6-29
Table 6-24: Chemical and Pesticide Use per I&D Scheme (kv).........................................................6-29
Table 6-25: Travelling time from Capital city to District centres.......................................................6-32
Table 6-26: Travelling time from District centres to village/reservoir/I&D sites...............................6-32
Table 7-1: Screening of Positive Environmental Impacts.....................................................................7-1
Table 7-2: Screening of Negative Environmental Impacts...................................................................7-2
Table 8-1: Screening of Positive Socio-Economic Impacts..................................................................8-1
Table 8-2: Screening of Negative Socio-Economic Impacts................................................................8-2
Table 10-1: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan for Dam Safety Rehabilitation.....................10-3
Table 10-2: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation.................10-12
Table 10-3: Monitoring Variables, Linkages, Indicators and Baseline Data to be considered..........10-25
Table 10-4: Cumulative Impacts -Monitoring Indicators and Possible External Factors.................10-26
Table 10-5: Environmental and Social Monitoring Plan..................................................................10-28
Table 12-1: Proposed Communication Pathway................................................................................. 12-3
Table 12-2: Suggestions of External Reporting.................................................................................. 12-4
Table 13-1: Preliminary Estimates of ESMP Costs............................................................................13-1

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

vi

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

vii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ALL Albanian Lek
ARB Authority for River Basins
BWA Basin Water Agencies
BWC Basin Water Councils
C Degrees Centigrade
CEIA Centre for Environmental Impact Assessment
DB Drainage Board
DCM Decision of the Council of Ministers
DLP Defect Liability Period
DSDC Department of Strategy of Donor Coordination
EA Environmental Assessment
EC European Commission
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EFD Environmental Framework Document
EI Environmental Inspectorate
EMP Environmental Management Plan
EMiP Environmental Mitigation Plan
EMoP Environmental Monitoring Plan
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
ESFD Environmental and Social Framework Document
ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
EU European Union
FIDIC International Federation of Consulting Engineers
FS Feasibility Study (Mott MacDonald)
GDWSS General Directorate for Water Supply and Sewerage
GoA Government of Albania
HPP Hydropower Plant
I&D Irrigation and Drainage
IFS Institute for Food Safety
IPH Institute for Public Health
IPM Integrated Pesticide Management
IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature
IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management
LGU Local Government Unit
m/s2 Metres per second squared
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
MTE Ministry of Tourism and Environment
MIS Management Information System
MIE Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy
NEAP National Environmental Action Plan
NEC National Environmental Council
NFA National Food Agency
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
NIVA Norwegian Water Agency

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

viii
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
NSDI National Strategy for Development and Integration
NWC National Water Council
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OP World Bank Operational Policy
% percentage
PCP Public Consultation Plan
PGA Peak Ground Acceleration
PIM Project Implementation Manual
PIU Project Implementation Unit
PPP Plant Protection Products
QTTB Centre for Agricultural Technology Transfer
RAPs Resettlement Action Plans
RBMP River Basin Management Plans
RCC Rehabilitation Construction Consultant
REA Regional Environmental Agency
RPF Resettlement Policy Framework
SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment
SEC Supervision Engineering Consultant
SIA Social Impact Assessment
SIDA Swedish International Development Agency
TA Technical Assistance
TDS Total Dissolved Solids
TOR Terms of Reference
TS Technical Secretariat of NWC
TSS Total Suspended Solids
TWL Top Water Level
USD United States Dollar
UK United Kingdom
WB The World Bank
WFD EU Water Framework Directive
WRC World Soil Reference Base Classification
WRIP Water Resources and Irrigation Project
WRMP Water Resources Management Project
WUA/Os Water User Association/Organization

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The main purpose of the Environmental and Social Framework Document (ESFD) is to ensure the dams,
reservoirs and irrigation and drainage (I&D) schemes that are to be rehabilitated comply with the existing
laws, regulations and customs in Albania as well as with the World Banks Operation Policies and
Safeguard Measures. Other aims of the ESFD will be to identify the most critical, overall environmental
issues for the irrigation sector in Albania and to assist Government of Albania (GoA) in developing
capacity for environmental impact assessment (EIA) within irrigation/agricultural sector projects; and
finally to develop environmental guidelines for water and irrigation projects in Albania, through design
and implementation to the monitoring and evaluation of results.

It is important to make clear that this ESFD covers all types of potential situations associated with
rehabilitation of dam and I&D schemes and not all the mitigation measures may apply in all cases.

1.1 Legal and Institutional Framework

The main legal instruments in Albania have been developed in compliance with European Union (EU)
standards; with the ultimate aim of EU accession. The National Strategy for Development and Integration
(NSDI) is the main document for strategic development within Albania whilst the National Strategies for
Agriculture and Food and similarly for Rural Development were developed to enhance synergies within
related public institutions. Notwithstanding, the National Environmental Action Plan (NEAP) that was
revised recently, stipulates that it is a constitutional right to live within an ecologically healthy
environment and prioritised investment in watershed management, forestry and flood control. Recently
Albania has introduced a new strategy for plant protection products (PPP). While the strategy is based on
EU guidelines, it over-emphasizes concerns about safe trade, use, storage, transport and disposal of
pesticides and related products, and fails to provide more comprehensive guidance for integrated pest
management. In view of the recently produced EU Framework Directive for Sustainable Pesticide Use,
Albania has indicated that it intends to prepare an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy that will be
inspired and consistent with the guidance provided in the Framework in order to be aligned for EU
accession.

The main laws concerning the Water Resources Irrigation Project (WRIP) are as follows:

Law no. 111/2012 On Integrated Water Resources Management,

Law no. 24/2017 On Administration of Irrigation and Drainage.
Law no. 139/2015 On Local Self-Government.

And the following Laws and By Laws:

Decision of CoM Nr. 1108 dated 30.12.2015, On Transferring of irrigation and drainage
infrastructure, staff and assets from Drainage Boards to Municipalities.
Decision of CoM No. 92, date 4.02.2015 On some changes and additions to decision No. 945, dated
9.10.2013, of the Council of Ministers, "On the determination of the state responsibility campaign of
the Ministry of Environment", amended.
Decision of CoM No. 91, date 4.02.2015 On some addition to decision no.939, dated 9.10.2013, of
the Council of Ministers, "On determining the state liability area of the Ministry of Agriculture and
Rural Development" (Following DCM no. 91 and 92 dated 4.02.2015, the responsibility of the
Water Policy Directorate was transferred from the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water
Administration (MEFWA) to the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MARD) responsible
for managing irrigation, drainage and flood protection)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Law on the Regulatory Framework in the Sector of Water Supply and Waste Water Administration
(No. 9915) and 2009 Ministerial Order No. 66, 2008
2
Law on Environmental Protection (1993), amended in 2002 and 2008 including EIA
Law on Protection of transboundary Lakes, (No 9103 in 2003).
Law On the Environmental Treatment of Wastewater (No. 9115 in 2003).
Decision of the Council of Ministers (DCM) no. 177, dt 31.03.2005 On the allowed norms of liquid
discharges and the zone criteria for the receiving water
Legal Framework on EIA Environmental impact assessment (EIA) was introduced in Albania in the
Law on Environmental Protection (No. 7664 of January 21, 1993) and amended by Law No. 8364 of
July 2, 1998.
Law no. 8681, dated 2.11.2000 "On the design, construction, use and maintenance of dams and
dumps.
Law No. 7662 of 1993 (amended by Law 8529 in 1999, then amended by law 9362 in 2005 and
finally supplemented by Law 9908 in 2008), on the Plant Protection Service provides for the
organization of the Service and for parasite control, pesticides and plant quarantine. The Ministry of
Agriculture and Food is responsible for the application of this Law.
Law 9108 of 2003on chemical substances and preparations- This Law regulates the use and
management of chemical substances and preparations with a view to protecting animal and human
health as well as the environment. Producers and importers of chemical substances shall apply for
registration, according to articles 9 and 10.

The National Water Council (NWC) is the primary authority responsible for water resources management
in Albania, whilst the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) is responsible for
managing water resources, irrigation, drainage and flood protection. The NWC is supported by the
Technical Secretariat of National Water Council (TSNWC), established by Decision of the
Council of Ministers (DCM No. 230, dated 23.4.2014 on Composition organization and
functioning of TSNWC). The Technical Secretariat of NWC implements water policy.
The Ministry of Tourism and Environment is responsible for environmental protection of forestry,
fisheries and water quality control.

The General Directorate of Water Supply and Sewerage (GDWSS) of the Ministry of Infrastructure and
Energy (MIE) is responsible for technical support to the water infrastructure, whilst municipal water
utility responsibility was devolved to the local government with authority for administration, investment,
maintenance, and regulation.
Authority over the river basins is quite complex.

Water management is organised at the Water Basins level through six Water Basin Councils (WBC), each
of which having a Water Basin Agency (WBA). Each of the Water Basin Councils (WBC) is chaired by
one of the responsible Prefects and is comprised of between 9 and 19 members representing ministries,
LGUs, businesses and consumers in the basin (DCM no. 342 dated 4 May 2016 on the approval of the
territorial and hydrographic boundaries of river basins in the Republic of Albania and composition of the
council of each of them). The Water Basin Councils are assisted by Water Basin Agencies (WBAs), which
function as a technical secretariat for the WBC Both the WBC and WBA are independent of each other.
They are responsible for implementing the LWR. They perform the technical evaluation of applications
for water abstraction (surface and groundwater), make recommendations for approval by the RBC,
support municipalities in solving problems related to water resources and are responsible for on-site
inspection of all activities related to water resources use.
The WBC approves licences which have been reviewed by the WBA.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Four Regional Directorate of Irrigation and Drainage (DIDs) funded by MARD are established under new
law On Administration of Irrigation and Drainage. While the municipalities are responsible for
3
management of irrigation and drainage systems already transferred to them.
Water User Organizations (WUOs) are expected to be active in medium term, being responsible for
operation and maintenance (O&M) of tertiary canals.

1.2 The ESIA process

The WRIP has been designated a Category B rating under the World Bank (WB) operational policy (OP)
and safeguard requirements. Under the Albanian Law of Environmental Protection the project also needs
authorisation from MTE before implementation can commence. Albanian and WB EIA procedures are
generally aligned in this context and require three steps, namely; i) screening, ii) environmental
assessment and iii) WB approval.

The following procedure needs to be followed: 13 site-specific ESMPs will be prepared by the MARD
(one for every reservoir Kurjan and Strum share the same reservoir). One public consultation will be
held for each reservoir sub project. A number of sample site specific ESMPs have been prepared during
project preparation.

The public consultation will occur when the ESMP is in a draft phase and the findings of the draft ESMP
will be discussed. The views of the public will be incorporated in the final ESMP.
.
MTE will need to approve the ESMP and once this is obtained, a relevant environmental permit issued.
The World Bank will review and provide no objection to the consultation result and Site Specific ESMPs.

1.3 The Project

The WRIP will comprise of the following components:

Dam and Irrigation and Drainage Systems Rehabilitation

a. Reservoir, I&D rehabilitation
b. Pipeline Preparation
Institutional Support for Irrigation and Drainage
a. Institutional reforms of the I&D sector
b. Support for Local Government Units (LGUs), WUOs
Institutional Support for Integrated Water Resources Management
a. Preparation of IWRM strategy
b. Strengthening the institutional framework for IWRM
c. Preparation of River Basin Management Plans
Implementation Support
a. Project Management
b. Establishment of Monitoring and Evaluation system

The project requires the rehabilitation and revitalization of 13 agricultural reservoirs, some which are
more than 50 years old, located throughout Albania in the northern part of Central Mountain Region, the
southern Part of Central Mountain Region, within the Intermediary Zone of the Adriatic Pre Lowland
Region, on the Intermediary Zone of the Hilly Central Region, and on the Intermediary zone between the
Hilly Central Region and the Southern Mountain Region. The sites are located within the districts of
Kukes, Kora, Berat, Fier, Lushnja and Saranda where agriculture remains the most important income
and economic output.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The I&D schemes at the sites are in very poor shape with only 44% of the intended irrigated area
operational, all reliant upon gravity systems, the pumped systems have broken down many years ago.
4
Essentially all dams and I&D schemes require some rehabilitation work; some more than others; one dam
needs to be rebuilt; some have bad siltation; and some have some stability issues. A geotechnical survey is
planned to be undertaken at all 14 sites during the detailed design stage. The I&D schemes vary in their
state of repair, some are generally still functional but others are completely broken. The options for
rehabilitation in this case are using gravity in most cases as this is the least cost option for sustainable
development.

The full extent of the rehabilitation works will not be known until after the detailed design. However, an
important point is that the intended rehabilitation of the dams and I&D schemes are all taking place
within the existing footprint of already established reservoirs and irrigated areas and no new land areas
will be taken as a result of the development. The rehabilitation works are also not near to, nor will they
affect, any protected areas as they are located a long distance from them. The sites for the rehabilitation
are also already heavily modified by past human interventions. Notwithstanding, four of the dam sites are
intended to have their crest raised by between 0.3 and 0.5 metres with a rise in top water level (TWL) and
this may impact on some shorelines and land surrounding the specific reservoirs, but in all cases this land
is the property of the state. Specific details of the extent of the flooded area at the raised TWL are not
known at this stage, but will become apparent during the detailed design.

1.4 Baseline
The Climate is generally Mediterranean and characterised by four seasons and influenced by
environmental characteristics such as geographical position, geomorphology, hydrology etc. Snow and
ice are common in the mountains in winter and the majority of the rain falls between Oct and April. June
and July are normally the hottest months. Winds are influenced by the geomorphology and the Adriatic
Sea. The ambient air conditions at the reservoir sites are generally good under natural circumstances as
they are quite far away from the cities or industrial areas.

The geology of the sites varies, but the most abundant rocks are magmatic (igneous) effusive sedimentary
and calcareous formations, which have been effected by a number of mountain building periods that
continue to this day. This is evident from the seismic conditions of the area where some of the sites lie
within quite seismically active zones. The detailed design for the rehabilitation works will analyse the
seismic effects on the reservoir sites.

Soils are varying widely throughout the sites and are heavily dependent upon the underlying geology,
flora and vegetation types, climate and exposure, water presence and effects etc. In the more elevated
areas, the soils are prone to heavy erosion. According to the World Soil Reference Base Classification
regosols, leptosols, cambisol, luvisols, and vertisols are present at the sites.

The sites lie within two basins; the Drini River (covering the sites in Tropoja and Kukes) and the Seman
River which covers the remaining sites. The Seman has two main tributaries; the Devolli and the Osum
rivers. The Drini is the longest river in Albania and combined with the Buna discharges about
21.4Mm3/yr of water to the sea. The Devolli River is the largest branch of the Seman River; accounting
for 88% of the discharge water.

The Albanian rivers are characterized by being highly erosive and with high turbidity. Notwithstanding,
the Drini River does not suffer from siltation problems as much as other areas. Karstic waters are also
common and influence the water quality particularly in the Seman River. Anthropogenic activity has also
negatively influenced the water quality and this is made worse by the lack of wastewater treatment. The
northern sites are not as badly affected by this. The quality of the irrigation water is also a cause for

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

concern at Murriz Thana in the dry season where high salinity is recorded and this can have a damaging
effect on crops. There is also potential for oil contamination near to the Zharrez reservoir site due to the
5
surrounding oil extraction industry, but clean up and containment has been undertaken recently due to
numerous hotspot clearance projects. The Seman Basin flows to the sea near to the Karavasta Lagoon
and it is important that irrigation return water from reservoirs in the Fier District do not influence the
water quality flowing into this protected area. Besides this site, none of the other protected sites in
Albania (15% of the whole of Albania has protected status) appear to be affected by the rehabilitation
works on the project.

The natural vegetated areas surrounding the study sites exhibit bush vegetation, comprised by
evergreen makia. In the hills, below 800masl, this vegetation is substituted by plantations, mostly olives
or fruit trees. With increasing altitude the main vegetation changes to oak (Quercus), beech (Fagus
Sylvatica), as well as hop hornbeam (Ostria Carpinifolia) and oriental hornbeam (Carpinus Orientalis).
At the altitude of 1,000masl and above woodlands of ash (Fraxinus) and pine (Pinus) appear. None of the
dam and reservoir sites are near to denominated national parks, national monuments or other protected
sites of special interest.

The fauna of the sites under the study is typical to Balkan and European elements. The areas surrounding
the sites are not very rich in wildlife primarily due to the close proximity of human settlements that have
existed in the area for a long time. In the more remote forest areas wolves, bears, wild cats and other
mammals occur and have a protected status. Around the reservoir sites and their surroundings many
different kind of raptors, reptiles and amphibians can be seen. The lake/reservoir waters have some fish
species introduced such as carp (Cyprinidae) etc. Within the upper streams of the study areas indigenous
fish species (i.e. Greyling (Salmos Thymallus)) are observed. The reservoir sites are situated within areas
which have been predominantly adapted for agricultural production. From the surveys undertaken at the
time of the site visits to the 14 dam sites and the 13 associated I&D schemes no flora or fauna was
identified within these project areas that could be considered to be at risk or threatened.

There are more people living within the rural areas than in urban centres. This can be interpreted by the
importance of agriculture development and irrigation needs in such regions. The areas have seen
migration away from the districts in the past 20 years, but this has now changed due to Albania obtaining
the right for free movement within EU countries, In the past two years the economic crisis in Europe has
implied that more Albanians have now returned home and represent a valuable labour resource for rural
development. Family sizes at the reservoir sites average between 5-6 people, the most populated districts
are Fier and then Lushnje, Berat, Kora etc. Farm sizes have decreased substantially from the days of the
cooperative farms and now average 1.2ha/farm.

Unemployment is quite high in the districts under review, but this is primarily in the urban centres. In the
rural areas, many of the people are self-employed on their own farms and are dependent upon an income
from marketing their produce. Health and social insurance is very low in these rural areas, with only a
few people from villages working in the state sector that qualify for health and social insurance.

Albanian is spoken throughout the project areas. Islam is the main religion, although the sites in Kora
district also have a high number of Orthodox, due to their proximity to Greece. Education follows similar
patterns to the rest of Albania, with better facilities in the towns of Fier and Kora. A similar pattern
emerges for health services with Kukes being the worst off, due to the districts remoteness.

Land use is related to land tenure, the state owns the protected areas, reservoirs, rivers etc. but this land
can be offered with a concession to private developers. In general, agricultural production is expected to
increase over the next few years, with more demand for fertilisers and pesticides, but with crop
production and tonnages increasing. However, there are factors that will hinder this development, such as

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

the excessively low income levels and continued poverty of the rural population that will reduce in part
the use of fertilizers and pesticides because they are not affordable by the majority. This on the one hand
6
is good for the environment as it helps prevent excessive water pollution, but on the other hand, crop
production quality and quantity is reduced. Nonetheless, there will be need for strengthening of capacity
to the MAFCP outreach services to promote IPM approaches and training in the project areas. Training
will include risks, hazards and safe practices for handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides but
also sustainable pest management based on an IPM approach. Provisions for this training will be
described in the site specific ESMPs for the I&D schemes.

The poor state of irrigation reservoirs and canals is also influencing a reduction of agricultural products.
Furthermore, problems of climatic change and malfunction of draining channels has created problems
with flooding during extreme rainfall events.

Within the areas of the irrigation schemes and reservoirs, the most popular crops are forages and alfalfa or
lucerne, with wheat grown in winter and spring, and maize grown in the summer. Small lands or gardens
are planted with vegetables. Beans and hay are grown also in Kukes district. There are a lot of fruit tree
plantations in Kora, Fier and Lushnje and Berat. In the southern areas, livestock dominates, with dairy
cows accounting for around 90% of the bovine structure

1.5 Environmental Impacts

Positive environmental impacts from the project are mainly long terms and are:

Improved flood control

Increases in intensive green cover from irrigation
Reduction in erosion activity
Improvements to human health
Improvements to the wildlife environment

Negative environmental impacts tend to mainly occur during the construction phase and are summarised
as follows:

Reduced irrigation capacity during rehabilitation works

Disposal of building/excavation materials
Human disturbance during construction from noise, dust, visual, etc
Illegal exploitation of materials (sand and gravel from rivers) or forestry
Accidents to workers or nearby residents
Uncontrolled generation of solid waste and sanitary waste
Decrease in reservoir depth due to siltation
Reduction in reservoir volume affects fish during the construction works
Inappropriate quality of irrigation waters
Accidental overflows
Danger of water logging and soil salinization

Positive social impacts are as follows:

Improvement to local incomes through employment in short term and long term
Improvement to local and national economy
Financial and educational improvements with an improvement in land value
Social and cultural improvements with a more stable population

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Potential for small scale hydropower at selected sites

Improvements in crop yields
7

Negative social impacts are as follows:

Reduction in reservoir capacity during the construction limits agricultural production that could lead
to unemployment and financial stress
Conflicts between stakeholders on use of reservoir water (i.e. fisheries, irrigation or hydropower)
Create differences/jealousy between owners of land under irrigation and those without.
Poor quality of irrigation waters can reduce or destroy crop yields.
Danger to public safety with irrigation canals and pesticide residue
Disruption to farming practices during construction

1.6 Alternatives
The following alternatives were reviewed;
The zero option
The delayed project option
Alternative Site relocation option.

Besides the alternatives referred to above alternative sources of water and demand reduction through
conservation and re-use and water management and monitoring were considered but were found to be
unrealistic and to have similar impacts to the current project under consideration.

None of the above options would be suitable; the 14 dams already exist, the 13 reservoirs are already in
existence and have been periodically filled and emptied over a number of years. The I&D schemes are
already in existence and there is no change to their existing footprint. The intended rehabilitation works
on the dams for safety and on the I&D schemes will improve the reliability and efficiency of this
irrigation resource.

1.7 Environmental and Social Management Plan

Site specific Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) will be prepared for each of the
project sites as a separate document. Site specific ESMPs will be divided into two parts; the first for the
dam safety rehabilitation works; and the second for the I&D schemes rehabilitation works. This is
because the construction contract for the dam safety rehabilitation is likely to commence in the first year
of WRIP and the I&D scheme rehabilitation is likely to commence in the second year. It is the intention
that the site specific ESMPs are used as much as possible in the tender document, hence the need to
separate the dam safety rehabilitation issues from the I&D issues. Each site specific ESMP in every case
will comprise two separate sections: a Mitigation Plan (EMiP) and a Monitoring Plan (EMoP). During
project preparation, a number of sample site specific ESMPs have been prepared.

Strengthening of the institutional framework can help the facilitation of the ESMP. This can include
issues such as improvements on legal and institutional management of I&D systems. Some suggestions
for the improvement of the legislation framework might be:

Define the role, competencies and responsibilities of local government units (municipalities) in I&D
management as a way to improve sector performance. This role may involve:
The transfer of right to use a substantial portion of infrastructure (small and medium
reservoirs, second and third channels of irrigation and drainage etc.) and transfer of
responsibility for operation and maintenance of net transfer of infrastructure;

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Promoting the establishment of WUO, by being an integral part of their management

8
structures and support for strengthening and functioning of the WUO
Fixing the irrigation service fees / drainage and collection aiming at a gradual coverage of the
costs.
Updating the laws on pesticide use and on raising awareness and promotion of integrated
pesticide management (IPM) by increasing monitoring provision
Mobilizing financial resources from other units of local government itself or securing grants from the
state budget based on needs.

It is anticipated that monitoring will be conducted during all phases of the project: namely design (pre-
construction), construction, operation and maintenance. The EMoP will play a pivotal role in ensuring
that the trends for specific parameters are tracked and it will provide information on compliance with
legislative norms, set guidelines or desirable operational limits; and form the basis for corrective actions
and modification of activities if necessary. The intensity of sampling will depend on the time and location
of the development activities and results derived from monitoring data.

The EMoP will take into consideration the scope of development, environmental and social sensitivity
and the financial and technical means available. The EMoP will identify and describe the indicators to be
used, the frequency of monitoring and the standard (baseline) against which the indicators will be
measured for compliance with the ESMP.

1.1 Timing and ESMP Costs

MARD should reassign an Environmental Engineer under the capacity building component of the WRIP
to oversee the dam safety and I&D schemes rehabilitation project. Alternatively the supervision of the
rehabilitation could be outsourced to a suitable experienced environmental consultant. According to the
Feasibility Study, the dam safety rehabilitation works for the individual sub projects will last between 2
months (for Staravecke) to 12 months (for Murriz Thana). The total combined costs for the dam
rehabilitation and I&D works have been estimated at USD 37.3 million. The cost for the dam safety
rehabilitation only is USD 10.5 million. The costs of the ESMP component, the majority of which are
contained in the above dam safety rehabilitation construction costs are estimated at about USD 1.6
million over a three year period

1.8 Public Consultation

The implementation of the WRIP overall depends on the meaningful participation of all stakeholders for
success. Consequently the public consultation process has commenced. Meetings have been organised
between the decision makers and the other stakeholders in each of the districts that contained the reservoir
sites. Invitees included farmers, Drainage Board / Irrigation and Drainage Directorate staff,
commune/municipality heads and representatives of the communes/municipalities, experts on reservoir
operation, agricultural experts. A social and environmental expert from the Consultant also attended the
meetings. Questionnaires were prepared and completed.

In general the meetings were conducted in a cordial manner and were very informative. Issues that arose
were on matters regarding the water quality of the water, this particularly concerned Murriz Thana
reservoir.

At least two other reservoirs are used or intended for use as small scale hydropower production. Belesova
reservoir has a small hydropower facility and one is intended for Murriz Thana

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Other points that were raised were on the siltation, as many of the sites were prone to high rates of
sedimentation which is seriously reducing the reservoir capacity.
9

In most of the sites drinking water is obtained from wells or other natural water sources, and it is of
satisfactory quality. Sewage is discharged into tanks (not septic) but small amounts are flushed into the
reservoirs (e.g. Belesova reservoir) during heavy rainfall. New buildings (house and restaurants) are
being built close to the reservoirs and there is some concern on pollution to the irrigation water.

However, in general all the participants were positive and interested at the immediate project
implementation despite the above environmental concerns and fully agreed with the proposed mitigation
and monitoring processes.

Upon completion of a draft ESFD, public disclosure meetings were held in Lushnja and Kukes, located in
the centre of the project sites in the two river basins, on September 14, 2012. Documents that were
disclosed include the ESFD, RPF and sample site-specific ESMPs. Minutes of these meetings are
presented in annex C. A third meeting will be held in Korca. Disclosure was initiated on 25th July 2012,
when public consultations were announced by posting notices in the regional Drainage Board and local
offices of the involved Municipalities. This notice informed the public that the documents mentioned
above were available to view in the board and commune offices, and invited interested stakeholders to
provide comments and ask questions.

A public announcement on the local television station TV7 (seven) was made on 13 th September 2012
inviting the public, authorities and relevant institutions to a meeting to have an insight into ESFD, RPF
and Site Specific ESMPs for the proposed dam safety rehabilitation and irrigation and drainage schemes
to be undertaken by the Project. Since local TV stations were judged to be the most effective way of
communicating with stakeholders to ensure broad coverage, messages were announced on local TV
stations on September 13. The public disclosure meeting followed earlier consultation meetings held
during preparation of the safeguards documents.

Prior to announcement on the television the printed version of the ESFD, RPF and sample Site Specific
ESMPs have been made publicly available on site, and also placed on MAFCP web site
http://www.bujqesia.gov.al//projekte/projekti i burimeve ujore
(http://www.bujqesia.gov.al/al/projekte/kadastra-kombetare-e-burimeve-ujore ). This documentation still
remains on view.

A printed version of the Draft GESMP, ESFD, RPF and Site Specific ESMPs was also available for
examination in the premises of MARD Project Office Tirana, on working days (Monday to Friday)
between the hours of 8.30 a.m. to 3.30 p.m.

The meetings were held on 14 September 2012 at 11:00 a.m. in the Meeting Room of the offices of the
Technology Transfer Centre (QTTB) in Lushnja and the Drainage Board in Kukes. In Lushnja, 30 people
attended the meeting. In Kukes, 19 people attended. The composition of the attendees was 9 and 19
farmers, and 9 and 6 staff members of the Drainage Board in Kukes and Lushnja, respectively.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
2 INTRODUCTION
2.1 Preamble
This document presents the Environment and Social Framework Document (ESFD) for the Water
Resources and Irrigation Project (WRIP) involving rehabilitation of existing dams for enhanced safety
and irrigation and drainage (I&D) systems. Dam safety rehabilitation works are planned to be conducted
in the first year of the WRIP project. Investments in the rehabilitation of the irrigation systems that are
associated with the dams will be done during year two of the WRIP project. A total of 14 dams and 13
reservoirs (2 dams share the same reservoir) and the immediate ancillary works around the reservoirs
systems are planned to be rehabilitated in the first year. Generic instructions for the preparation of site
specific ESMPs for the dam safety rehabilitation part and the I&D systems rehabilitation works (canals,
pipes etc) are contained in section 10 of this ESFD. The overall feasibility and preliminary design for
dam safety and the I&D systems rehabilitation are being undertaken by Consultants, Mott MacDonald
from the UK. It is important to stipulate that the rehabilitation works are to be undertaken within the
existing footprint of the 14 dam and 13 associated I&D schemes and hence it is not foreseen that any
private land will be taken for development.

The main purpose of the ESFD is to be a tool for ensuring that the infrastructure sub-projects (i.e. the
dams and reservoirs that are to be rehabilitated under Year1 implemented through the WRIP comply with
the existing laws, regulations and customs in Albania as well as with the World Banks Operation Policies
and Safeguard Measures and will not have a lasting adverse impact on the countrys population, the
natural environment or assets of particular cultural value. A summary of the possible environmental and
social issues and mitigation measures is presented in the chapters that follow. Cost estimates for
implementation of safeguards measures for infrastructure investments supported by the Project will also
be included in the site specific ESMPs that are under preparation.

The overarching goal of the ESFD is to improve decision making and to ensure that the dam and
irrigation improvement options that are being considered are environmentally sound and sustainable.
Another main objective of the ESFD is to ensure that in-country capacity, regulatory framework;
principles and procedures are established and will serve as the base for environmental assessments of all
future individual irrigation rehabilitation projects being carried out under the WRIP. More specifically,
the purpose of the ESFD will be to:

Identify 'the most critical, overall environmental issues for the irrigation sector in Albania;
Assist the Government of Albania in developing in-country capacity for environmental impact
assessment of irrigation/agricultural sector projects by developing the policy/regulatory and
institutional framework for EIA, as well as strengthening the EIA capacity in all institutions,
involved, i.e. in governmental road sector and environmental agencies and among national
contractors,
Define environmental principles for dam rehabilitation development under the WRIP;
Develop environmental guidelines for water and irrigation projects in Albania, covering
environmental considerations in all stages of a project from identification and selection of
rehabilitation works, through design and implementation to the monitoring and evaluation of results.

2.2 Layout and Structure of this Report

The structure of the ESFD closely follows the format shown in the terms of reference (TOR) for the
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys. In that regard
the following report structure has been provided:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Chapter 1 - Executive Summary

2
Chapter 2 Introduction
Chapter 3- Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework
Chapter 4- National and WB Procedures /Regulations Required for ESIA
Chapter 5- Project Description and Objectives
Chapter 6- Baseline Data
Chapter 7 - Environmental Impacts
Chapter 8 - Social Impacts
Chapter 9 - Analysis of Alternatives
Chapter 10 - Environmental and Social Management Plan split into two sections i) covering dam
safety rehabilitation and ii) I&D rehabilitation includes:
o A: Mitigation Plan
o B: Monitoring Plan
Chapter 11 - Public Consultation Summary of Inter-agency and Public Consultation Meetings
Appendices (any reference and supporting information deemed necessary

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
3 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
3.1 Policy and Legal Framework
In Albania, many legal instruments regulate activities related to environment, agriculture, land use, land
protection, forestry etc. These laws have been generally developed in compliance with European
standards and requirements, since Albania is working towards EU accession.

The National Strategy for Development and Integration 2007-2013 (NSDI) represents the
fundamental strategic document of the country that harmonizes for the first time the perspective of the
sustainable economic and social development, integration into the European Union and NATO structures,
as well as the achievement of Millennium Development Goals. The NSDI was finalised in December
2007 and approved by DCM no. 342 date on 12 March 2008.

The NSDI crystallises the medium- to long-term vision of the development of Albania based upon an
open and transparent process, which guarantees the broad inclusion of the civil society, local government,
the business community, the academic and scientific world, the Albanian political spectrum and other
groups of interest. Implementation of NSDI envisages the building of policy analysis capacity to ensure
that the goals/objectives of NSDI are effectively translated into concrete policies and programs at the
ministry level.

The National Strategy on Agriculture and Food and the National Strategy Plan for Rural
Development, also covering the period 2007-2013, were developed to provide the framework for
integrated rural development programs and are designed to enhance synergies among all related public
institutions. Poverty reduction and sustainable management of natural resources (including land, water,
and biodiversity) are among the objectives. Another relevant key strategic document is the National
Environmental Action Plan (NEAP), that was prepared in 1994 and revised in 2001 with the ultimate
goal of meeting the constitutional right to live in an ecologically healthy environment. The plan identified
several priority investment programs, including watershed management, forestry, and flood control

The both above National Strategies were revised and new Strategies were adopted by Albanian
Government for the period 2014-2020, which intend EU integration of the country.

A new Plant Protection Product Strategy (PPP) has been introduced into Albania in 2012 in order to
comply with EU requirements for accession. To comply, Albania is required to complete a detailed
questionnaire sent by the EU. Part of this questionnaire deals with Plant Health and PPP, including
pesticides (point 54). In order to address this issue and respect the EU legislation a new decision of the
council of ministers (DCM) was prepared that considers separately the trade, disposal and transport of
pesticides and other chemicals and a separate Guide of the Council of Ministers (GCM) will be prepared
separately for pesticide use criteria no legal act has yet been drafted on pesticide use. Point 54 of
Albania Questionnaire for EU candidature which responds to PPP is contained in Annex A1.

While the PPP strategy provides a comprehensive framework for addressing trade, use, storage and
disposal of pesticides, the strategy falls short in addressing pesticides in a more comprehensive way
through a strategy on integrated pest management (IPM). In this respect, the EU recently adopted a
Framework Directive 128/2009 on the sustainable use of pesticides. The Government of Albania (GOA)
has indicated that it intends to follow this directive, and that a strategy for IPM will be prepared soon.
The strategy to be adopted by GOA will be consistent with the EU Directive to achieve more sustainable
use of pesticides and will include:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

reducing the risks and impacts of pesticide use on human health and the environment
2
promoting the use of IPM and of alternative approaches such as non-chemical alternatives
establishing National Action Plans (NAPs) with targets, measures and timetables to reduce risks and
use of certain products
provide for access to training for professional users, farmers, distributors, advisors
awareness raising for the general public
regular inspection of application equipment in professional use
prohibition of aerial spraying
protection of the aquatic environment and drinking water (buffer zones, low-drift equipment,
reduction of use when risks of run-off)
prohibition or minimisation of pesticide use in specific areas
safe handling, storage and waste of pesticides
calculation of risk indicators to monitor progress
promotion of low pesticide input farming and IPM

Full support for the preparation of the strategy and comprehensive support for its
implementation is beyond the scope of WRIP. However, WRIP will support IPM by
including a session on IPM approaches in its farmers/WUAs training program. Issues
that will be covered in this training include IPM strategies and techniques,
integrated crop management strategies and techniques, organic farming principles,
biological pest control methods, information on the general principles and crop or
sector-specific guidelines for IPM, alternative crop husbandry measures to prevent
and/or suppress harmful organisms by: crop rotation, use of adequate cultivation techniques (e.g. sowing
dates and densities, under-sowing, conservation (zero) tillage, pruning and direct sowing), use, where
appropriate, of resistant/tolerant cultivars and standard/certified seed and planting material, use of
balanced fertilisation, liming and irrigation/drainage practices, preventing the spreading of harmful
organisms by hygiene measures (e.g. by regular cleansing of machinery and equipment) and protection
and enhancement of important beneficial organisms, e.g. by adequate plant protection measures or the
utilisation of ecological infrastructures inside and outside production sites. The training program will be
elaborated during preparation of the site specific ESMPs.

3.1.1 Principal Legislation

Albanias 1996 Law on Water Resources (No. 8093) (Water Law) comprising the Law No.8093,
dated 21.3.1996 On Water Resources improved, updated and adapted with the Law No. 8375, date
15.07.1998, Law No.8605, date 20.04.2000, Law No.8736, date 01.02.2001, Law No. 9837, date
03.12.2007, Law No.10 137, date 11.5.2009 is the primary legislation governing the countrys inland,
maritime, surface, and groundwater and is intended to ensure the protection, development, and sustainable
use of the countrys water and provide for its proper distribution. The Water Law addresses water rights,
water use, and governance of water resources. A new law on water management has been drafted and was
being circulated internally for review in 2010. The Law no. 111/2012 On Integrated Water Resources
Management was adopted by Albanian Parliament in 2012.

The '1999 Law on Irrigation and Drainage (No. 8518) comprising the Law No 8518, date 30.07.1999
On Irrigation and Draining improved, updated and adapted with the Law No 9860, date 21.1.2008 On
Some Changes and Additions in the Law No 8518, date 30.07.1999 On Irrigation and Draining
established the structure for Water User Associations (WUAs) and Water User Organisations (WUO
which are private groups that manage water irrigation infrastructure at and below the secondary canal

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

level. Federations of WUAs manage the primary canal networks. The government maintains ownership of
the infrastructure.
3
The Law no. 24, On Administration of Irrigation and Drainage, adopted in 2017 gave to the
municipalities a key role for irrigation and drainage management.

The Law on Organization and Functioning of Local Government (No. 8652) (2000) transferred
responsibility of water supply and management of water utilities to local government (communes and
municipalities).
By the Law no. 139/2015 On Local Self-Governement and Law no. 24/2017 On Administration of
Irrigation and Drainage the irrigation and drainage service is one of the key functions of the
municipalities

The 2008 Law on the Regulatory Framework in the Sector of Water Supply and Waste Water
Administration (No. 9915) and 2009 Ministerial Order No. 66 provides authority for the establishment
of an inter-ministerial working group for the evaluation of projects and issues related to drinking water
supply and sewage sector in Albania. The working group is led by the MIE.

The Law on Environmental Protection No. 8934, (1993), amended in 2002 and 2008) forms the basis
for environmental management in Albania. The law addresses the prevention and reduction of pollution,
sustainable management of natural resources, monitoring, how to define pollution levels. It provides
binding provisions for EIA and the implementation of the polluter pays principle. The law provides the
institutional framework for environment.

The MEis the highest governmental body responsible for environmental protection. Beginning in early
2006, the ME was additionally tasked with overseeing most issues related to water, pasture, and forest
management. The ME may propose measures for the protection and preservation of the environment,
forestry and water resources and is responsible for the implementation of water policy and forestry policy.
To support of the activity of ME the following are established and operate:

The National Environmental Council (NEC), and

The Councils on sector environmental policies, which are composed of persons in the environmental
field, representatives of research and education institutions, ministries, other central institutions, members
of NGOs etc.

The composition, the duties and the function, of the NEC, as well as the expenses for its establishment and
functioning are approved by the Council of Ministers upon the proposal of ME. To realize and enforce
legislation for environmental protection at the local level, the Regional Environmental Agencies (REAs)
are in charge, which are specialized bodies in environmental protection, dependant upon the ME.

The Environmental Inspectorate (EI) functions within the ME as a specialized body on environmental
control. The inspectors exercise their control activity in all the territory of the Republic of Albania, while the
inspectors of the REAs operate within the prefectures territory.

Protecting and maintaining the natural water resources, and their rational and fruitful administration, is
one of the main aims of the Law on Environmental Protection. Water protection intends to ensure the
prevention of the further destruction of the surface water quality and exceeding respective quality norms,
recovering of contaminated surface water quality, and achievement of the water quality objectives,
improvement of the balance of extraction levels and natural regeneration of groundwater, protection of water,
flora and fauna.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The Law on The protection of transboundary Lakes, No 9103, date 10.07.2003, consider protection
and monitoring of transboundary lakes and their basins. The law is focused mostly at three main Lakes; of
4
Shkodra, Prespa and Ohrid. The law aims at the environmental protection of the transboundary lakes in
their natural state, guaranteeing the appropriate conditions for the development of life and ecosystems in
these lakes, through the promotion of useful activities in compliance with the requirements of the
sustainable development principle and stopping of activities that threaten them. Further to this aim,
unique ecosystems, with international value, such as the above mentioned transboundary lakes, are
specially protected by the state, and have been proclaimed as protected areas, according to laws no. 8906,
dated 06.06.2002, on Protected areas and no. 8093, dated 21.03.1996 on Water reserves, as well as
through international conventions ratified by Albania. (Now, all of them are proclaimed by the Decisions
of Councils of Ministers as protected areas, while Skadar Lake is proclaimed as a Ramsar site). The
scientific research activities in transboundary lakes are implemented with the approval of the REAs or by
MEFWA.

Law No. 9115, dt 24.7.2003 On the Environmental Treatment of Wastewater is aimed at protecting
the environment and the health of people from the negative impacts of wastewater, defining the rules for
their environmental treatment and the obligations of wastewater discharge. The objects of this Law are the
urban and industrial wastewaters, according to the special branches of the industry, waters from the
irrigation of the agricultural lands and sewerage of any kind.

Decision of the Council of Ministers (DCM) no. 177, dt 31.03.2005 On liquid discharges and the
criteria for the receiving waterscontains the approved standards for various industries and the quality
of urban water following treatment, based on the respective instructions of the EU. This act sets the
criteria for classification of the receptive water bodies, aiming at the compilation of the list of sensitive
and less sensitive areas, which are reviewed every 4 years. The law requests the active participation of the
BWCs and BWAs for the prevention and clean up of the water basins under their jurisdiction.

Legal Framework on EIA Environmental impact assessment (EIA) was introduced in Albania in
the Law on Environmental Protection (No. 7664 of January 21, 1993) and amended by Law No.
8364 of July 2, 1998. The law defines basic provisions and empowers the MEFWA to specify those
activities that will be subject to assessment. The shift in 1990 towards democracy, changes in the political
structure and the free movement of population have had a great impact on the country's socio-economic
structure. As a result of the changes during this period, an increased number of parallel activities and
development projects in several fields have been initiated, many of which could have considerable
environmental impact. Taking this situation into consideration, the ME identified the establishment of
effective EIA and strategic environmental assessment (SEA) systems as a priority. Not only will these
systems assist in meeting new challenges of country development, but they will also help to mitigate any
possibly negative impacts of new projects, policies, plans and programmes. Bearing this is mind, the Law
on Environmental Protection was reformulated and approved by the Albanian Parliament and entered into
force in October 2002. This new law contains a special chapter on EIA, and a more specific EIA law has
been approved in 2003.

Law No. 7662, of 1993 (amended by Law No 8529 in 1999 and further amended by law 9362 in 2005
and supplemented by law 9008 in 2008), on the Plant Protection Service is in accordance with EU
regulation 91/414/EEC and deals with quality control of all imported pesticides and their registration
procedure by a State Commission which includes ME membership. The law provides for the organization
of the Plant Protection Service and for parasite control, pesticides and plant quarantine. MARD is
responsible for the application of this Law.

In 1993 the State Pesticide Commission, was established with a mandate from the DCM No. 548, dated 6
December 1993, which regulated pesticides used in agriculture. Following review by scientific

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

institutions and the State Pesticide Commission on pesticide effectiveness, impact on human health,
animals and the environment, and possible secondary effects, pesticide registration was established that
5
requires a permit for the import and use of pesticides in Albania. The State Pesticide Commission was
renamed the State Commission on Registration of Products for Plant Protection under Law no 8529 in
1999. To date (September 2012), approximately 254 pesticides have been acceptable and licenced for use
in Albania whilst some 103 are not permitted to be imported but only can be marketed and used (this
covers for the existing stock in Albania) . Annex A2 provides a full list of pesticides permitted and not
permitted for import in Albania. The classification of pesticides, according to toxicity, is based on WHO
guidelines which are in line with the requirements of the WB OP 4.09.

Law 9108 of 2003 on chemical substances and preparations regulates the use and management of
chemical substances and preparations with a view to protecting animal and human health as well as the
environment. Producers and importers of chemical substances shall apply for registration, according to
articles 9 and 10. The Law consists of the following Chapters: (I) General provisions; (II) Classification
of chemical substances and preparations; (III) Registration of substances; (IV) Management of hazardous
substances and preparations; (5) Introduction into the market of hazardous substances and preparations;
(6) Authorization for management of hazardous substances and preparations; (7) Import and export of
hazardous substances and preparations; (8) Registration and notification of hazardous substances; (9)
Administrative contraventions and fines; (10) Transitory and final provisions. Appendix No. 2 of the law
contains the list of substances which may not be produced, imported, exported or distributed. Medical
products, feeding stuffs, cosmetics, plant protection products and substances that deplete the ozone layer
are excluded.

3.2 Regulations and other provisions concerning EIA in Albania

The EIA procedure is explained in the EIA Law (No. 8990 of January 23, 2003), while the main concepts
and interested actors in the process are defined in the Law on Environmental Protection (No. 8934 of
September 5, 2002), Chapter IV. Chapter IV on EIA and SEA, of the Law on Environmental Protection
contains eight articles regarding EIA and SEA. The section on EIA states that the EIA process is the
responsibility of the developer. Public participation and local government each play principal roles in the
process. This chapter's articles pave the way for the EIA Law that regulates the administrative part of the
process. It also grants rights to objections and court appeals against final decisions of ME on proposed
projects and EIA procedures. The law presents a concept of approval from the ME , namely:

an environmental statement (declaration) issued by the MTE;

an environmental authorisation issued by the MTE/regional environmental authority (REA); and
an agreement issued by an REA.

The issues of environmental authorisation and agreement are regulated within the law, while government
decisions are detailed in a separate article. Regarding construction permits, the MEFWA does not issue
environmental authorisations, but instead issues a declaration by which it agrees to or refuses a request,
accompanied by any additional comments. The new EIA Law also: determines the lists of projects which
require a full or partial EIA, and also lists the criteria by which projects are selected (Appendices 1 and 2
in the EIA Law);

specifies the contents of full and partial EIA reports;

provides a timetable for the process;
describes a developer's rights and duties, provisions for public participation; including descriptions of
roles of non-governmental and governmental organisations; and determines the position of REAs
within the process.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The law also introduces and implements the SEA process through the same procedure as that of
Appendix 1 projects that require a full EIA.
6
3.2.1 Major Players in the EIA Process
Major players in the EIA process in Albania are detailed as follows:

environmental authorities and representatives at the local and regional levels responsible for setting
up policies, legislation, permits, compliance and enforcements (MTE is the central body in the
environmental field, along with its REAs, who are dependent upon it). MTE operates in close
collaboration with several other ministries and institutions on specific EIA-related issues, such as the
MARD, Ministry of Health and Social Protection, MHSP, Ministry of Infrastructure and Energy, as
well as councils of communes, municipalities or districts and the relevant administrative units that,
according to the Law on Environment Protection, inherit their rights and duties regarding
environmental protection issues at national, communal and municipal levels.);
developers and investors responsible for preparing proper applications, implementation of permitting
conditions and self-monitoring of standards, etc.;
consultants and experts that prepare EIA reports;
Scientific and research institutions that conduct studies in the environmental field (Academy of
Science, Research Institute of Chemical Studies, Institute of Biological Research, etc.); and
NGOs that plays an important role in raising awareness, conservation and protection of natural and
cultural values, etc.

The Inspectorate for Environmental Protection has 43 employees, including REA inspectors. The chief
inspector for environmental protection and three other employees are based at MEFWA. Duties include
guiding developers in preparing EIA reports, receiving EIA reports and other required documentation,
reviewing EIA reports, inspection of areas proposed for development, and preparation of MEFWA
opinions are the responsibility of regional environmental agencies, according to the new EIA Law.

All applications for environmental permits need to be processed through REAs. Subsequently, the neces-
sary documentation is sent to the ME's EIA Directorate and the Inspectorate for Environmental
Protection, where an application is reviewed and a draft permit is prepared. The draft permit is discussed
with technical directorates and legal bodies to finalise conditions put forth in the draft permit. The
Permitting Commission then discusses the documentation. If the application for an environmental permit
is rejected, the developer receives official notice of this decision.

3.2.2 The EIA Process

According to the Law on Environmental Protection and the EIA Law, four types of environmental consent
can be issued:

Environmental declaration;
Environmental permit;
Approval; and
Authorisation.

ME and its agencies (REAs) determine whether a development project requires an EIA. Chapter III-
Article 6 of the EIA Law states that the REA responsible for the region where a project will be
implemented is responsible for determining whether or not the project requires an EIA. The Law on EIA
includes a list of projects that is fully in compliance with Annex I of the EC Directive. There are two lists
of projects determined for an EIA:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

7
those projects which require a full EIA; and
those projects which require a partial EIA.

The REA reviews an EIA reports first. It examines the lists of activities to reach a decision as to whether a
full or partial EIA is needed.

3.2.3 Strategic Environmental Assessment

Article 5 of the draft EIA Law determines that SEAs are required for: strategies and action plans for
energy, mines, transport, agriculture, forests, administration of natural and mineral resources, and waste
administration; and national and regional territorial plans for urban and rural areas, industrial areas,
coastal areas, tourist areas, protected areas, and those areas either damaged or highly sensitive to
pollution.

The state authority or natural and legal entity representing a proposal listed above, prepares the SEA
report and submits it to MEFWA.

3.2.4 Tenure Issues

Under the 1996 Water Law On Water Resources, the state owns all water resources in Albania. The
Water Law provides that surface water may be used freely for drinking and other domestic uses, such as
livestock watering, so long as the use is limited to individual and household needs. Water use is also
subject to administrative controls imposed by water authorities. Water authorities may restrict free use of
water during periods of water shortages or in the event of contamination. Law no. 111/2012 On
Integrated Water Resources Management, retains these provisions.

Non-domestic water users, and users of groundwater for domestic purposes must obtain permission,
authorization, a concession, or a license from the appropriate water authority, subject the following
conditions:

Permission. Water authorities may grant administrative permission for the use of underground water
for any purpose, water supplied by permanent installations, and water used for irrigation, livestock,
aquaculture, and industry. Permission is also required for planting of trees and crops on river beds and
the removal of solid material from river banks. Permissions are granted to WUOs for 10-year periods
and 5 years for all other users.
Authorization. Authorizations for water use necessary for research, exploration, and study of surface
and groundwater are available for periods up to 2 years.
Concession. Water authorities may grant concessions for the use of surface and groundwater for
public purposes, including hydropower stations, supply of potable water, and irrigation by agricultural
enterprises. Concessions are available for initial terms of 30 years with a potential 10-year extension.
The hydropower concessionaires will have to abide by operating rules that will be established in
consultation with other parties, and facilitated by the River Basin Agency
License. Commercial well drillers must obtain a license and separate permission for every well
drilled.

Law no. 8518, dated 30.7.1999 "On irrigation and drainage", and amended by Law no. 9860 dated
21.01.2008 " aims to set up:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

the legal framework for the establishment and operation of water user organizations, federations of

8
water user organizations and drainage boards;
the determination of institutional framework which will serve to a national policy for irrigation,
drainage, flood protection and erosion;
the determination of rights and duties of individuals and legal entities involved with irrigation,
drainage, flood protection and erosion;
the adjustment of transferring irrigation systems to water user organizations and federations of water
user organizations; and
the regulation of transfer of drainage systems and flood protection works to the drainage boards.

The new Law no. 24/2017 On Administration of Irrigation and Drainage, defines MARD as the main
authority responsible for directing the overall management of irrigation systems, drainage, flood
protection and reformation of this sector, while systems management is performed through a separation of
roles and responsibilities between the Regional Directorate of Irrigation and Drainage, municipalities and
the water use organizations.

Law no. 8681, dated 2.11.2000 "On the design, construction, use and maintenance of dams and
dumps" This law aims to build basic legal and institutional framework from which will flow all the
documentation governing the process of design, construction, use and maintenance of dams / dumps.
The law defines the state authorities that conduct their activity in the field of dams / dumps, design
criteria and rules of dams / dumps and criteria on ownership and exploitation of dams / dumps
Decision of the Council of Ministers of the nr.147, dated 18.3.2004 "On approving the regulation for the
safety of dams and dumps"

The regulation aims to establish rules that seek the safety of dams / dumps, including the processes of
design, construction, use and maintenance of them, to enable the implementation of complex
requirements (or special requirements) for the exploitation of water resources, security of the population
and economic values on river basins, at all stages of life of the dam / dumps.

The regulation for the safety of dams/dumps is required to be implemented on dams/ dumps that meet the
requirements of Article 3 of Law nr.8681, dated 2.11.2000 "On the design, construction, use and
maintenance of dams and dumps" from all ministries, institutions, state enterprises, owners and users that
conduct their activity in research, design, construction, use and maintenance of dams / dumps in Albania,
as well as by the national control organisms.

3.2.5 Land Expropriation and Compensation

In the Republic of Albania the legal framework for expropriation of land and resettlement issues mainly
consist of the following legal acts:

The Constitution of the Republic of Albania.

Law No. 8561 dated 22. 12. 1999 On Expropriations and Temporary Takings of the Private Property
for Public Interest
Law No. 9235, dated 29.7.2004 On restitution and compensation of private properties
Law No. 9482, dated 3.4.2006 "On legalization, urbanization and integration of informal properties
The Council of Ministers Decision No. 138 dated 23. 3. 2000 provides the legal criteria for the
evaluation of properties affected by expropriation.
Council of Ministers Decision No.438, dated 28.6.2006 "On the criteria, procedures and required
documentation that determine legalization of informal properties

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Further details on these legal documents are contained in the Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF)
9
which is a separate deliverable.

3.2.6 Other Legal Acts

The following are other legal acts of relevance to the project:

Law nr.7872, dated 9.11.1994 "On Ratification of the" Development Credit Agreement for the
Irrigation Rehabilitation Project between Republic of Albania and the International Development
Association (IDA)
Law nr.7974, dated 26.7.1995 "On the ratification of the" Loan Agreement between the Government
of the Republic of Albania and Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development for the Irrigation
Rehabilitation Project "
Law no. 8309, dated 18.3.1998 "On ratification of the" Loan Agreement between the Government of
the Republic of Albania and the Islamic Development Bank for the Plain Irrigation Project of Kora
Law nr.8533, dated 14.10.1999 "On the ratification of the" Development credit agreement between
the Republic of Albania and the International Development Association (IDA) for the Second Project
of Rehabilitation of Irrigation and Drainage "
Law no. 8819, dated 27.9.2001 "On ratification of the" Loan Agreement between the Republic of
Albania and Kuwait Fund "For Arab Economic Development," Project for the Rehabilitation of
Irrigation II
Law no. 9311, dated 11.11.2004 "On the ratification of the" Credit Agreement between the
Government of the Republic of Albania and the International Development Association (IDA),
Project Management for the Water Resources "
Law nr.9336, dated 16/12/2004 "On ratification of the" Credit Agreement between the Government of
the Republic of Albania and the OPEC Fund for the International Development Project of Water
Resources Management "
Law no. 9349, dated 03.03.2005 "On ratification of the" Credit Agreement between the Government
of the Republic of Albania and Kuwait Fund for the Arab Economic Development for the Irrigation
Rehabilitation Project (Phase III)
The National Water Strategy has been approved by VKM no. 273, dated 7.5.2004.
The draft Water Management Law circulating in 2010 maintains the system of water rights set forth in
the 1996 Water Law. In addition, the draft law adopts a national water strategy and establishes river
basin districts and a river basin-level management structure.
Law no 7659 of 1993 on Seeds and Saplings normally referred to as Planting Stock that will be
created, sold, preserved and quality controlled.
Law No. 7722 of 1993 on conservation of the stock of medicinal ether-oleaginous and naturally
tanniferous plants.
Law No. 7929 of 1995 concerning protection of fruit trees.
Law No 8529 of 1999 regulating the chemical fertiliser control service. This Law establishes rules and
procedures for the control of chemical fertilizers, both imported or domestic, available for use in the
Albanian market. Any individual or legal entity, registered according to Albanian legislation, has the
right to buy and sell chemical fertilizers and is subject to this Law. The Ministry of Agriculture and
Food supervises the Chemical Fertilizer Control Service which is organized and managed by the Land
Research Institute. Liabilities of entities that produce or trade chemical fertilizers are established by
this Law.
DCM No. 103 of 31st March 2002 concerning environmental monitoring in the Republic of Albania.
This concerns environmental monitoring, i.e. the programme of systematic measurement, observation

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

and reporting of environmental indicators. The latter are defined as the variables which give
information on a particular environmental phenomenon and make it perceptible by assigning it to a
10
numerical value for purposes of measurement and communication.

3.3 Institutional Framework

The National Water Council, which is under Albanias Council of Ministers, is the primary authority
responsible for water resources management. The National Water Council has responsibility for:
proposing legislation; managing the drainage basin plan; approving any water management plans relating
to agricultural, urban planning, industrial development or other projects; establishing necessary agencies
and organizational units; and approving water concessions.

The Technical Secretariat is the executive agency of the National Water Council and has responsibility
for: implementing national water policy and the legal framework; creating an inventory of water
resources; issuing permissions and authorizations for water use; and promoting research and
development. The General Directorate of Water Supply and Wastewater (GDWW) which is part of MIE is
a public institution established by the Council of Ministers specializing in water infrastructure. The
GDWW is responsible for providing technical support to the water and wastewater policies and creating
the strategic framework of the water and wastewater sector.

Responsibility for municipal water utilities was devolved to Albanias local governments (municipalities).
Local governments have four areas of authority: administration, investment, maintenance, and regulation.

Tariffs are based on the principle of cost recovery under the discretion of local government and within
general national policies. Actual transfer of responsibility for water resource governance to local
governments was a slow process that took place over several years. Most local governments were ill-
prepared to take on responsibility for water distribution; they did not have sufficient human and financial
capacity to create and rehabilitate infrastructure or manage the utilities effectively. Water utilities tend to
have high losses, low revenues and low collection rates. Illegal connections, especially by poor
households, are common.

The municipalities have established respective units for irrigation and drainage and receive financial
support from the state budget for rehabilitation of irrigation systems and operational costs.

Water User Organizations can be established at local levels to manage water resources, but for the time
being their role is very weak. In many areas WUOs have been unable to maintain infrastructure for the
distribution of water or to manage conflicts between different water users effectively.

3.3.1 Other key water management institutions

The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
MARD is the main state institution responsible for the overall direction of the administration of water
resources, irrigation systems, drainage and flood protection.

Management of irrigation, drainage and flood protection is performed through a separation of roles and
responsibilities between the Regional Directorate of Irrigation and Drainage, municipalities and WUOs

The Authority of River Basins

For effective implementation of policies on water management, the territory of the Republic is divided
into the 6 major water basins; and on this basis, at the local level 6 Authorities of River Basins (ARB)
Operate. ARB has consultative and regulatory function and are composed of two independent institutions,
the BWA and BWC

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The BWC is an assembly with a specific number of representatives, while the ARB supports activities of
the BWC with a permanent staff. The BWC is responsible for approving licenses (authorizations, permits
11
and concessions) which have been previously reviewed by the ARB. The BWC also approves the plan of
the management of basin water resources, the respective budget and makes the respective
recommendations to the local government units for their implementation.

The Ministry of Tourism and Environment

MTE has the task of developing and implementing policies, strategies and action plans for environmental
protection of forestry, fisheries and water quality control.

Ministria e Infrastruktures dhe Energjise

The role of MIE includes the drinkable water supply and the treatment of urban waste water and has key
role in water use for the production of electricity and safety of granting rights contract for the
construction of hydropower plants. Hydropower plants with reservoirs often become the reason of
flooding due to excessive discharges in the west lowland of the country. The floods are much severe in
the area of Under Shkodra because of the discharges from plants on the Drini River. The energy sector
has been currently the largest user of water.

The Ministry of Interior

The Ministry of Interior through the General Directorate of Civil Emergency coordinates activities of all
institutions to prevent and minimize damages from natural disasters, including floods from rivers or from
possible demolition of the dams and drought that lead to reduction of water resources.

The Ministry of Finance

The Ministry of Finance, based on government priorities, allocates funds in the sectors related to water
use management in the country.

3.3.2 Government Reforms, Interventions and Investments

The GoA adopted a Water Supply and Sanitation Strategy in 2003. The strategy included a short-term
priority reform and investment program (2003-2006) and medium-term reform and investment program
(2007-2012) to stabilize and improve water supply and sanitation services. The long term objective of the
strategy for the water supply and sanitation sector is to achieve sustainable water supply and sanitation
services at the EU Standards in urban and rural areas. Implementation of the ambitious strategy was slow,
but by 2008, ownership of the utilities had been transferred from the government to local authorities. The
utilities are not yet financially self-sustaining. With support from the World Bank, the GDWWS provides
technical assistance to local government and water supply and sewage companies, including helping the
water supply and sewage companies prepare five-year business plans and developing a phased program
on the reduction of subsidies covering the gap between tariffs and total cost, with a goal of eliminating
subsidies by 2012.

With support from the Japanese Government, the GDWWS prepared a study designed to support the
regionalization of water supply and sewage utilities. In addition, the water companies serving Berat and
Kuove were successfully merged and infrastructure constructed and rehabilitated with a grant by the
German Government.

The EU, Government of Germany, and other donors are supporting the GoAs effort to prepare an updated
National Water Strategy, which is contemplated as part of a new Draft Water Management Law under
internal consideration.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Other government projects include participation in the Albania-Montenegro Lake Shkodra Integrated
Ecosystem Management Global Environment Facility, which is establishing a Bilateral Lake Management
12
framework for the shared water resource.

Policies on integrate management of water resources are intended to promote coordinated management
and development of water, land and other resources associated with them, to maximize economic and
social welfare in an equitable manner, without jeopardizing the sustainability of ecosystems.

The continuous increase in demand for irrigation water the creation of a new industry increasing and the
expansion and the creation of new urban areas accompanied by an increase in water consumption,
especially the underground, and at the same time the increase of discharge waste water without processed,
etc., have put pressure on water resources under the country in the last 20 years. In this context, the
current policies aims are:

Development of a clear institutional structure and legal, with clearly defined tasks for each of the
institutions associated with effective and integrated management of water resources.
Support for the strengthening of administrative and technical capacity of ABL, especially on planning
and regulation of water use, the definition of clear and transparent criteria in the granting of permits
for water use.
Enforcement of obtaining uncontrolled gravel from river beds, which have cause degradation of the
river beds and taking out of function of works of receiving water for irrigation and protective
embankments.
Improvement of system for collecting and processing of hydro-meteorological data.
Increase the safety of dams.

In Albania, about 35% of the annual flows of water come from catchment basins in neighbouring
countries, while about 50% of Albania is included in transboundary river basins. On use of transboundary
watercourses and reaching agreements, the GoA has established an inter-ministerial committee that are
supported by a technical working group with representatives of institutions related to water.
Albania has several agreements with neighbouring countries over the use of water resources, but they are
quite outdated and not suitable for the new geopolitical realities and developments in the field of energy,
tourism, agriculture etc. That said, Albania has ratified in 1994 the UNESCO Convention on "Protection
and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and Lakes" and in 2002 a "Protocol on water and health".
Albania is also involved in the implementation of several environmental projects for transboundary lakes
as Lake Ohrid, Lake Prespa and Lake Shkodra.

3.3.3 Inter-sectoral Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development 2014-

2020

The Inter-sectoral Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development (ISARD) prepared by the Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) has been elaborated in accordance with the framework of
the Europe 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth and the overall strategic goal of
Albania becoming an EU member.

The strategy has been prepared in line with the EU strategic planning approach for the Common
Agricultural Policy (CAP) 2014-2020, while maintaining focus on the specific needs for development of
agriculture, agro-processing and rural areas in Albania. These needs and challenges are mapped and
analysed in a number of sector analyses and surveys accomplished as part of the strategy preparation
process.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The main objective of ISARD is to establish the strategic framework to address the challenges facing the
agricultural and agro-processing sectors and the economic, environmental and socially sustainable
13
development of rural areas. It aims to do this by proposing policy instruments similar to CAP instruments
with a specific focus on preparing the sectors, the policy instruments and the institutional arrangements
for EU accession, to sustainably improve the competitiveness of Albania.

Under WRIP, a draft strategy for irrigation and drainage has been developed and will adopted by the
government in coming months.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
4 PROCEDURES FOR ESIA
The Consultant understands that the WRIP was prepared as an environmental Category B project under
the World Bank operational policies and safeguard requirements. It is not foreseen to change the
safeguards category. Activities carried out under the WRIP will also need to conform to current Albanian
Environmental Regulations and the procedures of the World Banks Safeguards Policies.

The Albanian Law on Environmental Protection requires that any project or activity that will affect, or is
likely to affect the environment, has to receive an Environmental Declaration, Environmental Permit,
Consent or Authorization by the MEFWA before implementation may commence.

The Albania EIA procedures are generally in line with the World Banks EA process, as all projects
require environmental screening and possibly assessment in order to receive an Environmental
Declaration (for construction), and/or an Environmental Permit (for an activity having an impact on the
environment, including some construction activities). Furthermore the type and scale of the impacts the
project will have on the environment determine the procedures that have to be followed and the type of
approval granted. Also all the approvals include conditions that shall be observed by the proposer
including environmental monitoring and mitigation requirements.

The difference lies in the scope of the EIA required for those projects that fall into World Bank Category
B and the Albanian Law on EIA Appendix II. Some projects may be considered slightly differently under
the World Bank screening process, but still require a detailed EIA, while the same activities/projects
under the Albanian Law will require only a Summary EIA, unless the REA decides that the project must
undergo a thorough or complete EIA.

4.1 Proposed Screening Process

To streamline the EA screening process for WRIP it is proposed to adopt the approach shown in Table
PROCEDURES FOR ESIA-1 for all the sub-projects (individual irrigation dams, reservoirs and I&D
schemes).1
Table PROCEDURES FOR ESIA-1: Proposed Screening Criteria for World Bank and Albanian EA
Procedures
Category As
World
Per Procedure To Be Followed
Bank
Albanian (Meeting both Albanian and World Bank standards)
Category
Legislation
B2 Annex 1 and 2, Site specific ESMPs will be prepared by the MAFCP (to meet both Albanian and
MEFWA World Bank requirements) split into two sections, i) covering the dam safety
Guidance No. 3, rehabilitation and ancillary work and ii) covering the I&D scheme rehabilitation.
dated The 13 site specific ESMPs will be prepared for every reservoir (Kurjan and
08/17/20043 Strum share the same reservoir) that will be rehabilitation during the first year of
WRIP and then separate site specific ESMP for each I&D scheme selected
during the second year of WRIP. The content of the Site Specific ESMP will
essentially cater for the requirements of the Summary EIA required under
Albanian law, but this will need confirmation by the relevant REA. A number of
sample site specific ESMPs have been prepared to provide guidance for the
preparation of the 13 final site specific ESMPs.
1
For a more detailed breakdown of the screening process, refer to Table B2 in Annex B of this ESFD.
2
In case a Category B sub-project is listed in the EIA Law Appendix 2, the EIA will be prepared in parallel with the ESMP to MEFWA
requirements
3
On Approval of the List of Business Activities, Application Forms and Rules and Procedures to Grant Environmental Consent and
Authorization from the Regional Environmental Agencies (REA)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Category As
World
Per
Bank 2
Albanian
Category (Meeting both Albanian and World Bank standards)
Legislation
One public consultation will be held for each reservoir or I&D sub project.
ME approval of site specific ESMPs will be obtained, and the relevant
environmental permit issued.
The World Bank will review and provide no objection to the consultation result
of the Site Specific ESMPs.
Full details of the screening criteria required under Albanian law and WB OP4.01 are contained in Annex
B of this ESFD. It is clear that the nature of the sub-projects as they stand at this stage is WB Category B.
The planned content of the site specific ESMP will cater for the requirements of a Summary EIA
document as per Albanian law.

The technical design of a sub-project will integrate the findings and comments originating from the EIA
(or in this case the site specific ESMP) and include recommendations made for the design and the
mitigation of the impacts expected, as well as the conditions of any environmental approval granted.

The components of the WRIP will be prepared and implemented according to Albanian legislation,
regulations and standards and to comply with the operational guidelines and directives of the World Bank.
As mentioned in the previous chapter, the Albanian legislation is in the process of being harmonized with
the EU legislation.

In view of the development objectives of Albania, related EU directives will be reviewed and, to the
extent practicable and feasible, applied to any project investments subsequently proposed or yet to be
implemented. In case of non-compliance with EU directives, the sub-project proposal should provide
reasons why this is not possible.

The MARD/MTE will be responsible for the screening process and ensuring that the Local Government
Units (LGUs) follow the required environmental procedures. The The MARD/MTE shall monitor and
support the screening process and satisfy itself that the procedures are being followed to the satisfaction
of the Albanian Law and World Bank policy. In the event of any deviations or unreasonable delays it
shall seek the advice of the relevant party/parties and provide any necessary support and advice to
overcome/correct the problems.

The process will comprise three steps:

Step 1: Screening: The MARD/MTE will determine the type of environmental approval required in
accordance with Appendixes 1 and 2 of the Law on EIA, other relevant legislation 4, and according to the
classification presented in Table PROCEDURES FOR ESIA-1 above, and prepare and submit the request
and the necessary documents to the Regional Environmental Authority (REA) 5. Within five (5) days of
receiving the request, the REA will review the required documentation, classify the proposed sub-project
in accordance with Appendixes 1 and 2 of the Law on EIA and other relevant legislation, and the
classification presented in Table PROCEDURES FOR ESIA-1. It shall decide whether the sub-project
will require an EIA, and then decide whether it should undergo a Summary EIA, a Summary EIA
enhanced to match WB requirements (Category A EIA), or a Profound EIA, and advise the
LGU/sub-project proposer accordingly. This process has concluded that the sub projects warrant an
ESMP to be prepared which essentially covers the requirements of the Summary EIA content under
Albanian law, but the final say rests with the relevant REA.

4
including MEFWA Guidance No. 3, dated 08/17/2004
5
see Council of Ministers Decision, No. 249, dated 24. 04. 2003, Concerning the Endorsement of Applications for Environmental
Licenses and Information Items in the Environmental License, and MEFWA Guidance No. 3

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Step 2: Environmental Assessment: According to the screening decision on the type of EIA required (if
3
any), the LGU/sub-project proposer shall proceed as indicated in Table PROCEDURES FOR ESIA-1 and
the accompanying notes above (also refer to Annex B of this ESFD). In the case that an EIA is required,
this process shall include preparation of the ToR for the EIA and procuring and engaging EIA specialists
according to the procurement rules for the WRIP.

For any EIA required, the REA shall inspect the EIA report and the data presented and shall consult with
its experts and other appropriate bodies, e.g. cultural heritage, environmental groups, etc. It will then
prepare, in writing, a recommended decision in favour of approval or refusal of the sub-project, with
justification(s). In the case of approval of the application it shall also propose any environmental
conditions, monitoring requirements, etc., to be included in the approval. This decision shall be forward
to the MEFWA within twenty (20) calendar days of the submission of the EIA report, accompanied by the
EIA report. The MEFWA shall review this decision, seek expert advice, etc., as required and either
approve or reject the application, with the necessary justification. When no EIA is required, the REA, or
the MEFWA6, shall issue the relevant environmental approval 7, with any environmental conditions,
monitoring requirements, etc., after review of the sub-project design and the ESMP.

Step 3: World Bank Approval: On receipt of the environmental approval by the MEFWA the LGU/sub-
project proposer will forward a copy to the MARD, accompanied by the documentation required for
review by the World Bank. MARD shall satisfy itself of the appropriateness of the decision, confirm to
the Bank that the applicable environmental procedures have been followed, and submit the documentation
for review.

The World Bank will review the information provided and, if it considers the assessment and the ESMP
are appropriate and satisfactory, will provide a no objection and the sub-project may proceed to design
completion and for Construction Permit, and implementation, alternatively it will suggest areas where
strengthening is needed before the above process can be completed.

4.2 Public Consultation

Chapter 11 of this ESFD provides more information on the public consultation process, but the
procedures and relevant legislative requirements are described below.

4.2.1 Stakeholders
The main goal of the stakeholder and public consultation implemented for the various components/
sub-projects/ activities under the project will be to prepare a framework that will facilitate a consensual
project implementation, ensure that they will be in compliance with Albanian laws, regulations 8 and
customs as well as with the Banks policies, and that they will not have a lasting adverse negative impact
on the local population, the natural environment or properties of particular cultural value, whether on the
site or elsewhere.

The stakeholder and public consultation plan required under Albanian law includes identification of the
stakeholders and public representatives that should participate in the process and the approach to be used.

Albania is an emerging economy and society; it is therefore possible that new stakeholders will emerge
during the life of the WRIP, some will disappear, and that the relevance of some existing ones will
change. The identification and selection of the main stakeholders will therefore be carried out regularly,

6
as determined by MEFWA Guidance No. 3, dated 08/17/2004, and other relevant legislation
7
Environmental Declaration for construction, etc, Environmental Permit, Authorization or Consent for the exercise of any activity
having an impact on the environment
8
This shall include any changes expected as a result of harmonization with EU policies and procedures.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

using a screening process based on the roles and responsibilities of each stakeholder at each stage of the
4
sub-project cycle. The MARD and MTE will need to monitor and advise on any modifications required if
they are not implemented automatically by the responsible bodies in the field.

The main national stakeholders are considered to be MAFCP and MTE. The role and relevance of each
national stakeholder will change depending on the issues to be consulted.

The main local stakeholders are considered to be Districts and the local government units (LGUs), i.e.
the municipalities and their urban offices, the REAs and Local Environment Inspection offices. Other
stakeholders may be identified in the design of project components and sub-projects.

The main public representatives are local NGOs active in the region, social associations, business
community organizations such as local Chambers of Commerce, hoteliers associations, tourism
associations etc.

4.2.2 Procedure for Public Consultation

For projects falling in World Bank Category B projects, the responsible LGU with support of
MARD/MTE will consult the project affected groups and local NGOs about the sub-projects
environmental aspects and take their views into account. This will be done according to the procedures
defined in the Albanian Law on EIA, as developed more precisely in the Public Participation Regulations
Nr.1 On Public Participation of EIA process issued by MTE, dated 17.08.2004 (Nr 233 of Prot.).
This Regulation is drafted to apply to Article 26 of the EIA law. Where this process is not sufficient to
meet WB policy requirements they will be enhanced. Broadly these requirements are as follows:

Category B: The public consultation will occur when the ESMP is in a draft phase and the findings of
the draft ESMP will be discussed. The views of the public will be incorporated in the final ESMP. The
stakeholder and public consultations will be carried out either as a sector approach or as a multi-sector
approach, depending on their type. Both approaches will comprise a set of consultation measures to be
designed and implemented from the beginning of the activity/action through to its end. This should also
include any procedures required for the operation phase, especially performance monitoring.

The public and stakeholder consultation and participation will be realized through:

information to public and stakeholders about a component, sub-project or activity, including access to
key data and indicators in hard or electronic copy;
Ensuring conditions that maximize opportunities to express opinions and participate in the decision
making process, though public debate and other consultative processes:
o Public meetings
o Workshops
o Exhibitions
o Individual meetings with stakeholders
o Distribution of questionnaires
o Advertisement, notices , media
Consideration of any proposals for improvements and ways to make them;

Preparing and implementing the consultation process will comprise the following steps:

Identification of national and local stakeholders and public representatives as suggested above;
Preparation of the simple and adequate information of the activity/action to be displayed to
stakeholders and information to public;

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Determination and organization of the events required;

5
Facilitation of the events;
Recording the information and opinions and advice obtained;
Consideration of the above information in finalizing the design and the operation and maintenance
arrangements, etc.; and
Co-ordination of the time table/schedule for each of the above steps.

The public consultation process has already underway and minutes of meetings are included in this ESFD
document (Annex C)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

5 THE PROPOSED PROJECT

The WRIP responds to requests from MARD and the Department of Strategy of Donor Coordination
(DSDC), and integrates strategic support for IWRM and institutional support and investments in the
rehabilitation of reservoirs and associated irrigation and drainage (I&D) infrastructure, to be implemented
by MARD.

5.1 Project Objectives

The project development objective is to increase the area under improved I&D, to improve the safety of
dams and to establish the institutional basis for improved IWRM in the two priority river basins (Drini
and Seman rivers).

The project aims to capture synergies and evident opportunities for win-wins between water resources
management and irrigation, by far the largest and most inefficient user of water. Promoting water use
efficiency in irrigation schemes will increase farmers incomes and strengthen water resources
management. Addressing dam safety issues will enhance their functionality for flood management, while
at the same time improving the quality of irrigation service delivery. Improving farmers incomes will
enhance the resource base for IWRM, which will, in turn, require relevance of rational water resources
management to a large segment of the population to ensure involvement and ownership. Support for the
preparation of agreed river basin management and development plans will tie the preparation of an
IWRM Strategy at the national level to structural and non-structural improvements in the quality of water
services delivery at the local level that are of immediate relevance to large numbers of water users.

As part of the preparation of the proposed WRIP to be financed by the World Bank (WB), the
Government of Albania (GoA) wishes to carry out an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
(ESIA), Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys to assess the potential environmental impacts of the
project, prepare an Environmental and Social Framework Document (ESFD) 9, prepare 13 site-specific
ESMPs and Social Impact Assessment Report for sub-projects that will be executed during the first year
of project implementation, prepare a Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) prepare specific Resettlement
Action Plans10 (RAPs) for the initial first years dam rehabilitation projects and carry out baseline studies
of irrigated perimeters served by each dam

5.2 Project Components

The proposed project will comprise of the following components:

Dam and I&D Systems Rehabilitation

Institutional Support for Irrigation and Drainage (I&D)
Institutional Support for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)
Implementation Support

5.2.1 Component 1: Dam and I&D Systems Rehabilitation. This component will be implemented by
MAFCP. The objective is to rehabilitate (and, where possible, modernize) I&D systems and dam
infrastructure. The intermediate results indicators include the number of dams rehabilitated in compliance
with international dam safety standards, number of dams where emergency response plans have been

9
World Bank Operational Policy 4.01 for Environmental Assessment. Visit the World Bank website at
worldbank.org/safeguards to review the safeguards policies and related materials.
10
The World Bank policy on Involuntary Resettlement OP /BP 4.12

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
prepared and disseminated to the population, water users (including female farmers) provided with
improved I&D services, and area with rehabilitated/modernized I&D infrastructure (ha). Safeguards
indicators are number of site specific Environmental and Social Management Plans (ESMPs) and number
of Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) prepared.
The component will finance the following sub-components:

(a) Rehabilitation and modernization of selected dams and I&D systems. This sub-component
will finance preparation of all feasibility and detailed design studies, and all rehabilitation
and modernization works of 14 dams and associated I&D systems, as well as the supervision
of the works. Investments will be mostly located in the Drin-Buna and Semani river basins,
and will be undertaken in a comprehensive way (i.e., investments will be done as much as
possible in dams and in associated I&D systems) to maximize the returns on investments.

(b) (i) Preparation and implementation of safeguard instruments and measures associated with
the rehabilitation and modernization activities under Component 1(a), including ESMPs and
RAPs, and (ii) strengthening the framework governing safety of agricultural dams, including
capacity strengthening and awareness raising, and preparation of emergency preparedness
plans, supervision and quality assurance plans, and dam safety O&M plans, including an
instrumentation plan.

(c) Preparation of a pipeline of investments in irrigation, drainage and dam infrastructure

rehabilitation, including carrying out of feasibility and detailed design studies and related
safeguard instruments. This sub-component will finance all studies required to prepare a
pipeline of shovel-ready investments in irrigation, drainage and dam infrastructure
rehabilitation in a total amount of US$50 million for investment in a subsequent investment
operation.

5.2.2 Component 2: Institutional Support for Irrigation and Drainage. This component will be
implemented by MAFCP. The objective is to improve the performance of organizations that provide
irrigation services. This includes institutional reforms and capacity strengthening of LGs, DBs and
WUOs, and piloting PPP in I&D service delivery through recruitment of third party operators to deliver
irrigation services in three I&D pilot schemes. The component will also finance preparation of a National
I&D strategy. Intermediate results indicators include irrigation transfer contract between MAFCP and LG
prepared, number of (female) farmers trained, number of I&D transfer agreements signed, number of
Bulk Water Delivery contracts signed between DBs and WUOs, I&D strategy prepared, operational
WUOs created and/or strengthened, and number of PPP contracts signed.

The project will finance the following sub-components:

(a) Institutional reforms of I&D sector. Definition of responsibilities for O&M of I&D systems
among stakeholders (including Ministry, DBs, LGs, WUOs and private operators) through,
inter alia, (i) preparation of a National I&D strategy; (ii) development of cooperation
arrangements (including contractual arrangements) among agencies including through
provision of consultants services; (iii) development and formalization of I&D service
delivery standards; and (iv) development and carrying out of small scale pilots in public-
private partnership, including outsourcing O&M of I&D schemes to private operators.

(b) Strengthening the capacity of organizations that provide I&D services and the capacity of
stakeholders (including Ministry, DBs, LGs, WUOs and private operators) inter alia, through

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

3
provision of goods and training in areas, including contract management and outsourcing,
administration, financial management and procurement, and water management and O&M.
The project will train an estimated 10 civil servants from MAFCP, 15 civil servants from five
DBs, staff from 15 LGs, and office bearers from 15 WUOs. Decentralized WUO support
staff from DBs and LGs will be trained in strengthening capacities of WUOs. Some goods
will be procured for DBs and LGs.

5.2.3 Component 3: Institutional Support for Integrated Water Resources Management. Its objective
is to establish the strategic framework to manage water resources at the national level and at the level of
the Drin-Buna and Semani River basins. Capacity strengthening activities, critical for satisfactory water
sector performance, will be fully integrated into each of the subcomponents to ensure their relevance and
applicability. During project preparation, a number of activities have been undertaken, including
preparation of TORs for developing a National IWRM Strategy and establishing a Water Resources
Database. The recommendations of these preparation activities will be implemented once the project is
effective. The intermediate results indicators are number of (female) staff trained in IWRM, percentage
increase of budget allocation to RBAs. Throughout project implementation, MARD is expected to
increasingly demonstrate leadership in the management of the countrys water resources, and to
progressively show responsibility as convener of stakeholders in water resources management.

The project will finance the following sub-components:

(a) Preparation of a National IWRM Strategy including establishment of a stakeholder forum for
cross-sectoral dialogue and decision making under the aegis of the NWC, and strengthening
capacities of institutions responsible for IWRM, such as the NWC, TS, and the RBCs and
RBAs of Drin-Buna and Semani basins. In view of EU candidate status, the strategy will
incorporate the EUs WFD, as reflected in the Law on Water Resources. The project will
ensure inclusiveness of the preparation process by involving all stakeholders involved in the
management of water resources. A communications strategy will be prepared and
implemented to accompany the investments and the preparation of the strategy.

(b) Preparation of River Basin Management Plans for the Drin-Buna and Semani river basins
including identification of structural and non-structural measures to improve the quality of
IWRM and strengthening capacity to implement said plans through provision of training and
goods to River Basin Agencies and minor rehabilitation of their offices.

(c) Establishment of a consolidated Water Resources Database to be used as basis for national
water resources planning and programming. The database will be established within MARD.
The proposed water resources database will be populated through the coordinated acquisition
of monitoring data from all relevant organizations involved with water resources monitoring.

5.2.4 Component 4: Implementation Support. This component will be implemented by MARD. Its
objective is to manage project resources in accordance with the projects objectives and procedures as
outlined in the POM. The intermediate results indicator is the number of project monitoring reports based
on the established Management Information System (MIS) submitted on time.

The project will provide support for the implementation of the project, including provision of technical
assistance, training and goods, and establishment and implementation of a performance based
management information system:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

4
(a) Project Management. Project implementation will be mainstreamed into the regular functions
of the implementing Ministry. Support for project implementation will include: (i) provision
of technical assistance, training and office equipment, and incremental operating costs in
support of project management; (ii) overall project planning, quality oversight and evaluation
of project activities; and (iii) strengthening procurement and financial management capacity
at all levels.

(b) Establishment of a Monitoring and Evaluation system. The project will support the
establishment of a performance based MIS and arrange for data collection and reporting on
key performance output and impact indicators, through a baseline surveys (completed during
during project preparation) and follow up surveys at the Mid-Term Review and at project
completion.

5.3 The Project Area

5.3.1 Location
The project in the first and second year consists on rehabilitation and revitalization of 13 agricultural
reservoirs (two dams Kurjan and Strum share the same reservoir) and associated I&D schemes, located
at Northern part of Central Mountain Region, Southern Part of Central Mountain Region, on Intermediary
Zone of Adriatic Pre Lowland Region, on the Intermediary Zone of Hilly Central Region, and on the
Intermediary zone between Hilly Central Region and Southern Mountain Region.

All reservoirs and associated I&D schemes were built during the so called Central Economy period for
irrigation purposes. Most of such reservoirs were and still are used also for fishing. Because of the fairly
long period of their existence; some of the reservoirs are more than 50 years old; these water bodies are
considered almost natural in character. Notwithstanding, the reservoir biodiversity is actually not that
natural, and in the past several fish species were introduced to control eutrofication (by fish grazing the
water plants) and to be used as source of food.

The approximate location of the dams, reservoirs and I&D schemes under review are shown on the
satellite image in Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-1 below. Essentially there are three groupings of
dams:

Group 1 focused around Kukes and Tropoja comprising #7, #8, #9 and # 12
Group 2 focused around Korca comprising #4 and # 10; and
Group 3 focused around Fier and Berat comprising #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, #11 #13 and #14.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Source: Google Earth

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-1: Location of the Project Area

The numbers on the Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-1 can be cross referenced with the list of
reservoir , dam names and irrigated areas shown in Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-2 below. It can be
seen that the sites are widely dispersed within the two river basins of Drini-Buna in the north; and the

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

6
Seman with the sub basins of the Devolli and Osum rivers upstream, in the south central region of
Albania.

5.3.2 Key Dam Reservoir and I&D Information

Key information on the dam, reservoir is shown in Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-2 below.
Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-2: Details on the Location and Statistics of Dams and proposed I&D areas
Proposed
Total Dam Dam
Town Irrigated Population
Nr. Dam Latitude Longitude Storage Height length
Nearby Area Affected
Mm3 m m
Hectares
1 Murriz Thana Dam 19o 50 06 E 40o 51 21 N Lushnje 42,000 66.00 17 3570 210
o o
2 Kurjan Dam 19 43 31 E 40 43 19 N Fier 6500 31.5 17 540 350
o o
3 Strum Dam 19 43 36 E 40 44 19 N Fier 6500 NA 17 700 80
o o
4 Leminot Dam 20 41 33 E 40 47 51 N Kora 400 1.20 33 180 1300
5 Duhanas Dam 20 00' 44" E 4044' 26'' N Berat 200 1.90 39 235 420
6 Belesova Dam 20o 02 45 E 40o 48 59 N Berat 912 1.40 42 304 200
7 Tregtan 2 Dam 20o 20 25 E 42o 08 15 N Kukes 17 0.06 10 254 30
o o
8 Tregtan 3 Dam 20 20 10 E 42 08 37 N Kukes 315 0.95 32 137 30
o o
9 Vranisht 2 Dam 20 22 28 E 42 09 36 N Kukes 217 0.65 27 158 60
o o
10 Koshnica 1 Dam 20 55 38 E 40 32 01 N Bilisht 800 2.35 31 300 10
o o
11 Staravecke Dam 20 24 13 E 40 28 43 N Skrapar 60 0.15 30 170 50
o o
12 TPlan Dam 20 03 49 E 42 16 11 N B. Curri 600 1.80 25 360 15
o o
13 Zharrez Dam 19 40 13 E 40 42 06 N Fier 600 1.90 22 520 390
o o
14 Slanica 19 48 39 E 40 44 33 N Berat 230 0.80 32 250 75

Total 51,851 104.65 3220

Group 1 Dams
Group 2 Dams
Group 3 Dams

The reservoirs and I&D schemes are located close to inhabited sites, most of them close to villages, and
some close to the cities. The regions/prefectures of Kora, Berat and Fier (9 of the reservoirs and I&D are
situated in these three prefectures), are some of the most important municipalities of Albania.

Agriculture remains the most important economic output for those municipalities. The others, are situated
in Skrapare and Kukes (and close to Bajram Curri) municipalities, and represent a very important
instrument for agriculture development.

The agricultural industry of Albania was fundamentally changed at the beginning of the 1990s. In the
1980s towards the end of the Hoxha regime approximately 700,000 hectares of agriculture land existed
and 52% of this was irrigated (Volgi 2012). The industry comprised of large state or co-operative farms
and by 1983 when the collectivisation process was largely complete the average farm size was 1320ha
(Halcrow, 2001).

In the beginning of the 1990, the Democratic Parliament approved the new law of The Land, when the
land was separated between peoples that worked on it, or administrated it regardless of whether they had
inherited it from their forebears.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

More recently, the Law of The Land has undergone revision and improvement with the introduction of
new by-laws made by decisions from the council of ministers (DCMs) who are trying to give legal right
of ownership of agricultural land to those that have inherited it, but this policy has not been fully
implemented till the present day. Most farms now typically comprise of three non-contiguous blocks of
land, such that most farms can be considered smallholder and part time affairs. These smallholdings are
now of average size of 1.11ha (MAFCP, 2010), with the total amount of agricultural land now being
approximately the same as the pre-1990 figures at 695,000 ha. However in 2010, only 29.4% of this land
was irrigated (MAFCP 2010), primarily due to breakdown of ageing system, no rehabilitation and no
maintenance.

5.3.3 General Description of Reservoirs and I&D Schemes

The irrigation schemes at their peak functioned very well and were characterized with inlet and outlet
channels (with some exceptions) and functioned with either a gravity fed scheme or with a pumped
section in the original design. Over the course of time and with no maintenance, many of these schemes
have become inefficient and much of the irrigated areas have been reduced due to failure of the pumped
sections, siltation of the irrigation channels, or serious erosion and siltation in the reservoir and dam
structure. Only 44% of the intended irrigated areas are now watered. This can be seen in the Table THE
PROPOSED PROJECT-3 below.
Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-3: Summarised Data on Irrigation and Drainage Schemes
Estimate of Estimate of
Total Design Design Irrigated Design Irrigated
Current Current
Scheme Name Irrigation Area area Gravity area Pumped
Irrigated area Irrigated area
(ha) (ha) (ha)
Gravity (ha) Pumped (ha)
T'plan 470 205 265 30 0
Vranisht 2 217 217 0 50 0
Tregtan 2 28 28 0 15 0
Tregtan 3 315 215 100 155 0
Murriz Thana 29,300 27,590 1,710 15,000 0
Kurjan 6,200 5,300 900 2,100 0
Strum DATA INCLUDED UNDER KURJAN
Zharrez 600 600 0 300 0
Slanice 320 300 20 150 0
Belesova 1,280 1,150 130 100 0
Duhanas 550 280 270 50 0
Staravecke 80 80 0 20 0
Leminot 400 400 0 250 0
Koshnica 1 850 350 500 0 0
TOTAL 40,610 36,715 3,895 18,220 0
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

Essentially all dams require some rehabilitation work; some more than others. For example, Koshnica 1
needs to have the dam rebuilt due to a historic slip, Murriz Thana, Staravecke and TPlan all have some
stability issues than need to be addressed. A geotechnical survey is planned to be undertaken at all 14 dam
sites during detailed design which is planned in the first year of WRIP (indicated as Phase 2 in the Mott
MacDonald Study). Siltation is a significant concern at Belesova and Zharrez.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

8
The Feasibility Study by Mott MacDonald provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be
undertaken at the dams under review, and some general indications of the potential options for I&D
scheme rehabilitation. An important issue however is that four sites are planned to have their spillway
crest raised by between 0.3 and 0.5 metres (Zharrez, Slanica, Belesova and Duhanas). This will increase
the reservoir area at TWL and may impact on land around the existing reservoir shoreline. Details of the
extent of the flooded area are not known at this stage, but will become apparent during the detailed
design. This land surrounding these specific reservoirs is state owned and no private individuals will be
affected.

Data on Group 1 Reservoirs and I&D Schemes

There follows information on the Group 1 reservoirs and I&D schemes which has mainly been taken from
the Feasibility Studies from the Design Consultant (Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-4). The majority
of this information is tabulated as follows:
Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-4: Tabulated data on Group 1 reservoirs and I&D schemes
Name of Site Tregtan 2 Tregtan 3 Vranisht 2 TPlan
Date constructed 1969 1989 1970 1974
Dam length (metres) 254 137 158 360
Dam height (metres) 10 32 27 25
Capacity at TWL m3 56,000 945,000 650,000 1,800,000
Surface area at TWL (hectares) 3.5 11.8 6.8 17
Design irrigated area (hectares) 28 315 217 470
Road access to site poor poor poor No access
Surrounding geology sandstone sandstone sandstone Sandstone, siltstone, peat
From geological map Pyroxenite Pyroxenite Pyroxenite Evaporite
Reservoir Catchment area (hectares) 35 79 730 195
People considered at risk 30 30 60 0
Any protected areas downstream? No No No No
Any archaeological site downstream? No No No No

Tregtan 2
Tregtan 2 Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-2) in Kukes prefecture is located about 11.4
km north-west of the town of Kukes. The reservoir actually impounds its direct catchment only and is
understood to fill every year. Access to the dam is via a surfaced rural road for the most part. The last
section (nearly 0.3 km in length) is in very poor condition. No design or construction drawings were made
available at the time of the inspection and therefore only visual observations are reported here. The
catchment area is made up of steep wooded slopes near the dam. Tregtan 2 reservoir collects the water
from its own catchment area and the water coming through the spillway of the upper reservoir - Tregtan 1
(not considered in this project). The area immediately downstream of the dam is Tregtan 2 reservoir,
hence the area can be considered as a cascade together with Tregtan 2 and 3.

The drainage to the I&D area is by a natural valley and stream, There is one branch to the irrigation main
which his a small lined canal. There are no known feeder canals currently in place or in the original
design. The downstream I&D infrastructure for Tregtan 2 was rehabilitated in 2008. However it is
estimated that only 40- 50 % of the main canal can currently convey the design discharge. Hence only
around 15ha are currently irrigated from the original design of 28ha.

Significant parts of the downstream irrigation infrastructure are in need of rehabilitation to varying
extents. The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on
the original, current and future use of the scheme.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

9
Although the Tregtan 2 dam does not currently constrain the supply of water to the I&D scheme, the dam
is in poor condition and if not rehabilitated may need to be held down for safety reasons in future, which
would impose a significant constraint on the original, current and future use of the I&D scheme. A total of
1.2km of main irrigation channel is planned to be rehabilitated

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-2 Aerial View of Tregtan 2 Reservoir

Tregtan 3
Tregtan 3 Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-3) in Kukes prefecture is located about
12.1 km north-west of the town of Kukes. The reservoir impounds its direct catchment (30%) and has two
feeder canals (70%). It is understood to fill every year, if the feeder canals are cleaned and well
maintained. Access to the dam is via surfaced rural road for the most part. The last part (nearly 0.3 km) is
in very poor condition. No design or construction drawings were made available at the time of the
inspection and therefore only visual observations are reported here. Upstream of this reservoir there two
others: Tregtan 2 and Tregtan 1. Water flows from Tregtan 1 into Tregtan 2 and then again into Tregtan 3
from Tregtan 2. The catchment area is made up of steep wooded slopes near the dam. The area
immediately downstream of the dam is no longer used as farmland. The valley continues as a narrow U-
section with a width of 5 to 10 m for a few km.

The drainage to the I&D areas is by main and secondary canals that are lined. There are two siphons in
the pumped fed area, but the pump station is not functional (the transformer still operates, but pumps and
building have been removed). The downstream I&D infrastructure for Tregtan 3 was rehabilitated in
2006. However it is estimated that only 60- 80 % of the main canal can currently convey water and this
has leakage problems at present. Hence all parts of the I&D system need rehabilitation. Only around
155ha are currently irrigated from the original design of 315ha (215ha by gravity and 100ha pumped).

The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the
original, current and future use of the scheme. The condition of Tregtan 3 dam is poor with significant
seepage and erosion problems and although this does not currently constrain the supply of water to the
I&D scheme, the lack of a functioning feeder canal does. Furthermore, the dam is in poor condition and if

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

10
not rehabilitated may need to be held down for safety reasons in future, which would impose a significant
constraint on the original, current and future use of the I&D scheme. A total of 1.12km of main irrigation
channel in the gravity area and 6.7km of main channel in the pumped area are planned to be rehabilitated
together with rehabilitation of the existing pump station.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-3 Aerial View of Tregtan 3 Reservoir

Vranisht 2
Vranisht 2 Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-4) in Kukes prefecture is located about
11.6 km north of the town of Kukes. The reservoir impounds its direct catchment only and is understood
to fill every year. Access to the dam is via surfaced rural road for the most part. For the last 0.3km to the
dam there is no road. No design or construction drawings were made available at the time of the
inspection and therefore only visual observations are reported here. The catchment area is made up of
moderately flat wooded slopes near the dam. The area immediately downstream of the dam is farmland.
The valley continues as a narrow U-section with a width of 15 to 30 m for several kilometres. Some 8
houses were counted from the crest of the dam.

The drainage to the I&D area is by main and secondary canals which are lined. The downstream I&D
infrastructure for Vranisht 2 has not been rehabilitated since it was constructed and has also not been
maintained in decades. There are several pipes that cross the main canal from another nearby I&D scheme
called Fajzes that are in a severe state of disrepair and have in turn created problems for the Vranisht 2
I&D scheme.

It is estimated that only 25- 35 % of the main canal can currently convey water and this has major leakage
problems at present. Hence all parts of the I&D system need rehabilitation. Only around 50ha are
currently irrigated from the original design of 217ha all by gravity.

The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the
original, current and future use of the scheme. The condition of Vranisht 2 dam is very poor and this

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

11
implies that the dam will need to be held down for safety reasons in future, which would impose a
significant constraint on the original, current and future use of the I&D scheme.

A total of 3.5km of main irrigation channel before the bifurcation and a further 8km after bifurcation are
planned to be rehabilitated.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-4 Aerial View of Vranisht 2 Reservoir

TPlan
TPlan Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-5) in Kukes prefecture is located about 10.2
km south of the town of B. Curri. The reservoir impounds its direct catchment only and is understood to
fill every year. Access to the dam is via surfaced rural roads for the most part. The last 500m to the dam
is un-surfaced and you need to cross pasture and streams. During the visit the group walked to reach the
dam. The area appears to be made up of weak red sandstones, and siltstones. The area is also known to be
formed of ultra-basic rock. Immediately around the dam foundation there is thought to be some deposits
of peat. The catchment area is made up of wooded slopes near to the dam. The area immediately
downstream of the dam is pasture. The valley continues as a flat wide area, there are no houses within
500m downstream. Approximately 500 m downstream of the dam there is the local road.

TPlan has a feeder canal that operates as part of the pumped canal irrigation infrastructure delivery
system during the irrigation period and as a feeder canal intercepting the run-off from a nearby hillside
and delivering it to the reservoir at other times. Since 1996 it has not been possible to fill TPlan reservoir
due to the identification of the cracked bottom outlet, and since this time what remained of the irrigation
infrastructure has fallen into disrepair. According to the FS, the lower pumping station (P.S.1) is now
missing and the land where it once stood has been ploughed. The middle pumping station (P.S.2) exists as
a building in need of repair but the pumps, transformer, and connecting steel pipes are missing. The upper
pump station (P.S.3) building has now been destroyed and the contents are missing. It is believed that the
trace of the canals relating to the original scheme can still be seen however if this scheme was brought

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

12
back into operation the entire irrigation infrastructure would need to be rehabilitated. Apparently the
small area irrigated within the original scheme is believed to be irrigated by a few farmers (reported to be
18) of farm reservoirs constructed by the farmers themselves. Only around 30ha are currently irrigated
from the original design of 470ha (205ha by gravity and 265 pumped).

The current condition of the irrigation infrastructure, non-functioning canals and a dam which is not safe
to fill impose a significant constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. A total of
10.8km of main irrigation channel and 1.6km of main right branch canal are planned to be rehabilitated.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-5 Aerial View of TPlan Reservoir

Data on Group 2 Reservoirs and I&D Schemes
There follows information on the Group 2 reservoirs and I&D schemes which has mainly been taken from
the FS (see Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-5). The majority of this information is tabulated as
follows:
Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-5: Tabulated data on Group 2 reservoirs and I&D schemes
Name of Site Leminot Koshnica
Date constructed 1971 1973
Dam length (metres) 180 300
Dam height (metres) 33 31
Capacity at TWL m3 1,200,000 2,350,000
Surface area at TWL (hectares) 12 18.9
Design irrigated area (hectares) 400 (150 actual) 850
Road access to site good fair
Surrounding geology Weak sandstone clays
From geological map Clays, sands and coal Pliocene Aleurolites
Reservoir Catchment area (hectares) 940 714
People considered at risk 1,300 10
Protected areas downstream? No No
Archaeological site downstream? No No

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

13

Leminot reservoir
Leminot Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-6) in the Prefecture of Kora is located about
20 km north-west of the town of Kora. It is believed that the reservoir is filled entirely by its direct
catchment. A new 130m long spillway was constructed in April 2008. The reservoir is understood to fill
each year. The catchment area is made up of steep wooded slopes near the dam, with non-vegetated
mountainous slopes in the distance. The village of Leminot is located downstream of the dam.

The Leminot I&D infrastructure is one of the better schemes in terms of condition and this is probably
because approximately 5km of the right branch main canal and 0.5 km of the left branch main canal were
rehabilitated in 2010. However, for the rest of the main canal on both the right branch and left branch,
significant rehabilitation is required to enable the scheme to function as designed. Therefore the condition
of the un-rehabilitated downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the original,
current and future use of part of the scheme. Around 250ha are currently irrigated from the original design
of 400ha all by gravity

The condition of the Leminot dam is considered to be fair and does not currently constrain the supply of
water to the I&D scheme. A total of 7km of main irrigation channel on the right branch and 1.5km on the
left branch is planned to be rehabilitated.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-6 Aerial View of Leminot Reservoir

Koshnica reservoir
Koshnica 1 Reservoir in Kora prefecture is located about 12.3 km south of the town of Bilisht. Just
downstream of the dam there has been a pumping station lifting the water for irrigation of the uphill
slopes. The reservoir impounds its direct catchment (80%) and was fed by a feeder canal 20%. For the
last 20 years the feeder canal has been out of use. A large slip on the downstream face of the dam is the
main reason the reservoir has not filled in the last 12 years. The catchment area is made up of steep

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

14
wooded slopes near the dam, with non-vegetated mountainous slopes in the distance. The area
immediately downstream of the dam is farmland. The valley continues as a flat wide section with a width
of 50 to 100 m for a several kilometres. Further on the water flows into Devolli River.

The original I&D scheme was only part implemented because the dam had problems during the
construction. Only parts of the partially constructed canals were ever lined. Furthermore the rehabilitation
of the feeder canal is crucial to ensure the reliability of water supply from the reservoir. Nevertheless,
even with the feeder canal, and with proper operation of the reservoir it is questionable whether the
reservoir will be full prior to the onset of the irrigation season, but this was based upon a limited rainfall
data analysis. The downstream irrigation infrastructure is in a very poor condition and given that the dam
has failed and has not filled in the last 12 years this scheme needs the reconstruction of the Koshnica dam
to be considered possible to move forward. All parts of the entire downstream irrigation infrastructure are
in need of rehabilitation. Hence the current condition of both the failed dam and the downstream
irrigation infrastructure impose a significant constraint on the original, current and future use of the
scheme. Currently no land is irrigated at this site from an original design that had 850ha under irrigation
(350ha by gravity and 500ha pumped). A total of 22km of main irrigation channel by gravity is planned
to be rehabilitated.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-7 Aerial View of Koshnica 1 Reservoir

Data on Group 3 reservoirs and I&D schemes
There follows information on the Group 3 reservoirs and I&D schemes which has mainly been taken from
the TOR, and FS from Mott MacDonald. This is shown in Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-6 below.

Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-6: Tabulated data on Group 3 reservoirs and I&D schemes
Strum/ Murriz
Name of Site Staravecke Slanica Duhanas Belesova Zharrez
Kurjan Thana
Date constructed 1974 1963 1976 1982 1977 1962 1970
Dam length (metres) 170 540 (700) 250 NA 304 3,570 522
Dam height (metres) 30 17 32 39 42 17 22

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Name of Site Staravecke

Strum/
Slanica Duhanas Belesova
Murriz 15
Kurjan Thana Zharrez
Capacity at TWL Mm3 0.15 31,5 0.80 1.90 3.10 66.00 1.90
Surface area at TWL (ha) 4 355 8 16 25 850 35
912
Design irrigated area (ha) 60 5,430 230 1,280 29,300 600
(300 actual)
Road access to site poor good good good good good poor
Sandstone/ Sandstone/ Sandstone/ Sandstone/ Sandstone/
Surrounding geology NA mudstone
mudstone mudstone mudstone mudstone mudstone
Rogozhina
From geological map NA Flysch Flysch Flysch alluvium silts
suite
Reservoir Catchment area
NA 1,360 306 17,000 2,150 3,830 3,560
(ha)
People considered at risk 50 350 75 420 200 210 390
Protected areas downstream? No No No No No No No
Cultural/archaeological site
No No No No No No No
downstream

Staravecke
Staravecke Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-8 ) is located about 14.2 km southeast of
the town of Skrapare. The Staravecke reservoir is located at Poto Commune of Skrapare. The reservoir
impounds its direct catchment (60%) and has a feeder canal (40%). It is understood to fill every year if
the feeder canal is in use. Currently the feeder canal is thought to be out of use. The area immediately
downstream of the dam is pasture. There is no valley downstream, so the water will be flow on the slope
of the mountain for some 1 km passing through some 10 houses, before it reaches the stream in the valley.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-8 Aerial View of Staravecke Reservoir

The Staravecke reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the irrigation
period. There was once a 1km feeder canal which is now completely dysfunctional that originally flowed
into this reservoir. Based on the FS analysis, this feeder canal is essential for ensuring the reliability of the
yield for the I&D scheme.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

16
Other than the irrigation pipe immediately downstream of the outlet, which was rehabilitated in 2010 and
is considered to be in good condition the remaining downstream irrigation infrastructure has not been
rehabilitated since it was constructed, and has not been adequately maintained for several decades. It is
estimated that only up to 30% of the reservoir yield can be taken for irrigation through the canal system.
All parts of the entire downstream irrigation infrastructure are in need of rehabilitation. The current
condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on the original, current
and future use of the scheme.

The current condition of the dam is in a poor condition, and the feeder canal does not function and this
therefore constrains the reservoir yield and the supply of water downstream. Nevertheless due to the
deep-seated historical slip under the reservoir it may not be safe to rehabilitate the feeder canal and fill the
reservoir, and a failure of the dam would therefore significantly constrain the original, current and future
use of the scheme.

Currently around 20ha of land is irrigated at this site from an original design that had 80ha under
irrigation all by gravity). A total of 2.5km of main irrigation channel by gravity is planned to be
rehabilitated.
Strum/Kurjan
Kurjan and Strum Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-9) in Fier Prefecture is located
about 15 km east of the town of Fier. The reservoir is located at Kurjan Commune. Commune has about
228 ha of forests. Strum commune has about 30 ha of forests.. Trees that grow in these forests are mainly
pine, willow, and, shrubs, etc. The most widespread wild animals are fox, rabbit, and also various birds
like grouse, ouzel etc. Based on reports from Fier Drainage Board the actual capacity of this reservoir is
some 25.5 million m3 of water (less than the design estimate). The reservoir impounds its direct
catchment (contributes 20%) and has a feeding canal (contributes 80%) collecting the water from next
valley through the Cerven diversion dam. It is understood to fill every year, but for the last few years the
reservoir has been partially filled because of the lack of maintenance of the channel between Cerven dam
and Kurjan reservoir, and because of the lack of maintenance of the irrigation network downstream of the
dam. The catchment area is made up of moderately steep wooded slopes near the dam, with some non-
vegetated mountainous slopes in the distance. The area immediately downstream of the dam is farmland
amounting to some 10 ha. In the valley within 500m of the toe of the dam there is a village and further on
there are also several houses near to the downstream main stream, however the land is relatively flat.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

17

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-9 Aerial View of Strum and Kurjan Reservoir
The Strum and Kurjan reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the
irrigation period. The There is a large feeder canal which comes from Cerven Dam. In addition to this, the
original design included a pumping station which assisted with the filling of the reservoir; this has not
functioned for many years.

The feeder canal from Cerven reservoir feeds Kurjan reservoir and is vital to the reliability of the
reservoir for supply of water to the existing irrigation system in its present condition. The original design
included a pump station at Gorican which pumped water from the Seman River to a canal which then fed
Matke pump station which pumped water into Kurjan reservoir. Since these do not operate currently the
reliability of the reservoir yield is severely limited such that the original design irrigation area could not
be adequately supplied with water.

Approximately 60% of the downstream irrigation and drainage infrastructure was rehabilitated in 1998-
2006 and hence the remaining 40% of the mains and secondary irrigation channels are in need of
rehabilitation. The parts which have not been rehabilitated have not been adequately maintained, such that
the channel lining is significantly damaged or missing in a number of areas and there are areas of
significant blockage due to silt and vegetation.

The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure and the lack of the pumped feeder which
is crucial in ensuring the reliability of the design reservoir yield impose a significant constraint on the
original, current and future use of the scheme. It is estimated that 2,100 ha are currently irrigated from
the reservoir from a design area of 5,430ha (4,730ha of gravity fed and 700ha of pumped irrigation).

The instability of Strum dam is of concern and although the current condition does not impose a
restriction on the downstream supply, if works are not carried out and further movement is exhibited then

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

18
this could lead to the reservoir being held down on safety grounds which has necessary impacts on the
I&D system.

A significant amount of rehabilitation works are proposed at this site including 14.2km of main channel
and 26km of secondary channel on Section VMK1 and 13.6km of main channel and 59km of secondary
channel on VMK2 together with rehabilitation on 2 pump stations

Slanica
Slanica Reservoir is located in the Berat prefecture, about 14 km west of the town of Berat. The reservoir
actually impounds its direct catchment only and is understood to fill every year. Access to the dam is via
surfaced rural roads for the most part. The catchment area is made up of vegetated hills.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-10 Aerial View of Slanica Reservoir

The Slanica reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the irrigation period
and is supplied by direct catchment only (there are no feeder canals). There are two branches of main
canal totalling 11.2 km in length. Only 3.5 km of the right branch has been rehabilitated since original
construction. Part of this canal crosses the dam berm with a retaining wall on the dam slope. The main
canal is in very poor condition and the discharge of the canal is limited by the condition, and there is
substantial leakage. It is estimated that up to 50% of the reservoir can be conveyed through the canal
system. The pumping station which has been destroyed, that originally took water from the existing
siphon fed by the right branch. All parts of the entire downstream irrigation infrastructure are in need of
rehabilitation and this currently imposes a partial constraint on the existing, original and future scheme.
This scheme was originally designed for 320 ha, (300ha gravity and 20ha pumped.

The Slanica dam is in relatively fair condition and the accumulation of silt is small, however given the
downstream water supply needs, siltation will remain a problem. It is likely to require the raising of the
upstream outlet chamber every several years until the lower levels of the reservoir are silted. The
reservoir therefore imposes a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. A

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

19
total of 7.1km of main channel on the right branch and 0.7km of main channel on the left branch are in
need of rehabilitation on this scheme.

Duhanas
Duhanas Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-11 ) is located in Berat prefecture about 6
km north-east of the town of Berat. The Duhanas is situated in Velabisht Commune that has about 1800
ha of forests. These forests are dominated by alpine pastures and shrubs. Some of wild animals are rabbit,
fox, grouse etc. It is believed that the reservoir is filled entirely by its direct catchment. The direct
catchment area of the reservoir is steep and mountainous. The dam is in a steep sided valley about 5 km
upstream of the town of Berat. There are perhaps 25 houses at risk in the valley prior to reaching Berat
but the failure of the dam would probably destroy many more houses when account is taken of the likely
damage in the town of Berat.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-11 Aerial View of Duhanas Reservoir

The reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the irrigation period and
there is no feeder canal for this reservoir. The downstream irrigation infrastructure has not been
rehabilitated since it was constructed, and has not been adequately maintained for several decades. Due to
the failure in the downstream siphon, approximately 600m downstream of the dam, the main canal does
not function, and it is estimated that only 15 20% of the water which would have been used in the
original design, can now be used.

This irrigation water is taken via the stream bed and irrigation occurs by gravity. All parts of the entire
downstream irrigation infrastructure are in need of rehabilitation. The current condition of the
downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a significant constraint on the original, current and future
use of the scheme. It is estimated that only 50ha are currently irrigated by gravity on this scheme from an
original design of 550ha (280ha by gravity and 270ha by pumping).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

20

The Duhanas dam has some problems in some areas. The downstream outlet chamber and valve and the
canal immediately downstream of the bottom outlet valve are all in need of rehabilitation and they
currently leak significantly. The reduction in live storage capacity due to the inflow of silt is of concern
for the continued supply of water since it could block the upstream bottom outlet chamber such that the
outlet can not be operated. It is estimated that within 30 years the current live storage capacity will be
halved, assuming the upstream bottom outlet chamber is raised several times. The condition of the dam
does therefore impose a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. Around
18.5km of main irrigation channel by gravity are planned to be rehabilitation on this scheme.

Belesova
Belesova Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-12) is located in Berat prefecture about 15
km north east of the town of Berat. Belesova Commune has about 3520 ha of forests. These forests are
dominated by alpine pastures and shrubs. Some of wild animals are rabbit, fox, grouse etc.. It is believed
that the reservoir is filled entirely by its direct catchment. The reservoir is understood to fill on a regular
basis. No design or construction drawings were made available at the time of the inspection and therefore
only visual observations are reported here. Middle Oligocene formation of weak marine sedimentary
deposits of Flysch containing inter-bedded clay, sand and conglomerate layers. The catchment area is
made up of steep wooded slopes near the dam, with non-vegetated mountainous slopes in the distance.

The reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the irrigation period and
there is no feeder canal for this reservoir. The downstream irrigation infrastructure has not been
rehabilitated since it was constructed, and has not been adequately maintained for several decades. The
main canal is now no longer in operation and all water used for irrigation is taken from the adjacent
stream. All part of the downstream irrigation system are in need of rehabilitation. The current condition of
the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a significant constraint on the original, current and
future use of the scheme. It is estimated that only 50ha are currently irrigated by gravity on this scheme
from an original design of 1,280ha (1,150ha by gravity and 130ha by pumping).

There is a significant concern due to leakage along the new siphon pipe which could cause wash out
failure and therefore the reliability of yield is at risk due to possible failure of the dam. The reduction in
live storage capacity due to the inflow of silt is of concern for the continued supply of water since it could
block the upstream bottom outlet chamber such that the outlet may not operate. Even if the upstream
bottom outlet chamber is raised several times, the reservoir yield will decrease over time, and it is
estimated that within 15 years the current live storage capacity will be halved, and within 30 years nearly
all of the storage area will have been filled with silt. Hence, the current condition of the dam does
therefore impose a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. However,
should dam failure occur, this would pose significant constraint on the scheme. Around 11.8km of main
irrigation channel by gravity are planned to be rehabilitation on this scheme.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

21

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-12 Aerial View of Belesova Reservoir

Murriz Thana
Murriz Thana Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-13) is located in the Fier prefecture
about 15.5 km South-East of the town of Lushnje and is the largest reservoir of the 14 sites to be
reviewed. The reservoir impounds its direct catchment (approximate inflow contribution = 20%) and a
feeder canal (approximate inflow contribution = 80%). The feeder canal transfers water from the Devolli
River via a diversion adjacent to the Vlashuk village. The catchment area is made up of flat hilly slopes.
The catchment area (known as the Belshi Lakes) consists of many natural lakes which have formed due to
the karst topography of this area. The area immediately downstream of the dam is farmland and
populated. The river runs along the toe of the dam. Some two houses are just downstream the dam and
more are some 1 km further downstream.

The reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the irrigation period. In the
last 50 years it has always filled successfully, normally with filling commencing at the start of April.

It is understood that a concession has been let on the Devolli river for 3 hydropower reservoirs, and it is
highly likely these will be constructed and in-operation by 2019. The off take for Murriz Thane is
downstream of Banja reservoir which is the last reservoir in the hydropower scheme. Banja dam was
partly constructed during the late 1980s. There should therefore be adequate reliable flow in the Devolli
River at the off take, such that the feeder canal can feed Murriz Thana reservoir all year round.

However, it should be noted that since construction, significant siltation of the reservoir has taken place.
The Irrigation and Drainage board reports that 12 million m 3 of water volume has been lost due to this
and hence siltation should be seen as a threat to the ability of the reservoir to supply water to the
downstream irrigation scheme. It should also be noted that the use of the reservoir for hydropower will
lead to the reservoir being held full all year round and this will increase the silt accumulation rate. The
authorities should consider minimising the accumulation of silt through further study such as the

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

22
provision of a settlement basin upstream. The I&D schemes comprises four main branches; ukas, Krutja
Lushnje and Terbuf

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-13 Aerial View of Murriz Thana Reservoir

ukas branch canal irrigates in total 8,600 ha: 5,600 ha in the Lushnje Irrigation area and 3,000 ha in the
Fier Irrigation area. Its total length is 32 km and it supplies water to 46 km of secondary channels. The
branch is unlined and some structures were rehabilitated between 1995 and 2005. The first 10 km are in
cut, below the level of the surrounding fields, and the remaining 22 km is mostly raised. It is proposed in
the rehabilitation options that the conveyance system within the 22 km section is rehabilitated such that
approximately 50% of the canal is lined to reduce seepage losses and increase the reliability of water to
the tail of the canal which has suffered a shortage of irrigation water since the original construction of the
scheme in the 1960s.

Krutja Branch was originally 23.4 km long and irrigated 6,900 ha in Lushnje district. During the 1980s
the Branch was extended twice (bifurcating at the tail), the first (V2) by 9.2km to irrigate a further 1300ha
in Lushnje irrigation area, the second by approximately 6km (V1) to irrigate 1,000ha which belongs to
Fier irrigation area. Krutja Branch was originally designed only for the 6,900ha, and therefore, at peak
times there is not sufficient water to irrigate land associated with the extensions. Bitaj pumping station
pumps water during the peak season from the main drain (Bitaj collector) back into Krutja branch at the
point of bifurcation. This pumping station still functions although the immediate associated canals and the
pumping station are in need of rehabilitation. Only 20% of the rehabilitation of the canals and structures
on the main and secondary canals was undertaken in 1995 2005. The Krutja branch is a raised canal and
in need of lining which is proposed in all rehabilitation options. The scheme area supplied by this branch
is part of the most important agricultural land in Albania and it is therefore proposed that the canals are
lined to reduce the losses and that automatic regulation of the water level and off takes with automatic
duckbill cross regulators is implemented. This should ensure the provision of more than 8m 3/s (the

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

23
original design capacity) in the branch and increase the reliability of water supply at the tail to assist at the
peak times with supply in V2. This will reduce the reliance on the pumping station.

Lushnje Branch, which is 18.2km long to Lushnje town, irrigates 7100 ha from which 1200 ha are
pumped. The branch canal irrigates 1500 ha directly. Immediately downstream of Lushnje town the
branch canal divides into two main branches, V3 (5.1km) and V4 (16.7km) where the remaining hectares
are irrigated. Lushnje branch is a contour canal and has problems with silt and stability. There are also
60km of secondary channels. There were once 3 small pumping stations along Lushnje branch and V4
which irrigated the hillside (approximately 600ha), however these stopped functioning many decades ago.
At the tail end of V4 there is 600ha of irrigation by sprinkler (Terbuf), however this sprinkler irrigation
system is completely dysfunctional and the pipes have been removed.

Terbuf Branch which irrigates 4,400ha and starts approximately 6km south of Lushnje, takes water from
the main drain, K1, however this drain is supplied directly by the reservoir approximately 1km
downstream of the dam. The Terbuf branch main canal is divided into V1 and V2. 150ha are irrigated
from the main canal, 4350 ha are irrigated from the V1 and V2 main canals. The tail end of V1 has a
sprinkler irrigation section of approximately 500 ha which is called Grabiani, and is now completely
dysfunctional and the pipes have been removed. This sprinkler irrigation section was designed to be
supplied by V1 but never functioned as designed, however, in the few years that it was in function they
reused the water from the drainage network. Terbuf V1 and V2 where rehabilitated in circa 2000 as was
Grabiani. Grabiani is once again dysfunctional and approximate 30% of V1 and V2 now require
rehabilitation.

The current condition of the downstream irrigation infrastructure imposes a constraint on the original
design, current and future use of the scheme. The current condition of the reservoir has been held down
2m below TWL due to an upstream slip, hence the dam also imposes a constraint on the original design,
current and future use of the scheme. Around 15,000 ha are currently irrigated from Murriz Thana
reservoir from an original design 29,300ha (27,600 gravity and 1,700ha pumped).

In terms of rehabilitation, 32km of main canal and 46kms of secondary canal are planned at ukas
Branch; 23.4km and 9.2km (V2 only) of mains and 32kms of secondary canals at Krutja Branch; 40km of
main canals and 82kms of secondary canals at Lushnje Branch; and 30.1kms (including V1 andV2) of
main canal and 40.5kms of secondary canals at Terbuf Branch.

Zharrez
Zharrez Reservoir (see Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-14) in the prefecture of Fier is located about
9.8 km east of the town of Fier. The reservoir impounds its direct catchment only and is understood to fill
every year. During the visit the reservoir was full and the spillway was spilling some 1 - 2 m3/s. The
catchment area is made up of steep wooded slopes near the dam, with non-vegetated mountainous slopes
in the distance. The area immediately downstream of the dam is farmland. The valley continues as a U-
section with a width of 50 to 100 m for around 1 km. Further on, the stream produced from the spillway
flows into the main drain

The Zharrez reservoir solely supplies the downstream irrigation infrastructure during the irrigation period
and is filled by direct catchment only. In the original design of the I&D scheme there were two branches,
with14.6 km of main canals in total and 9 km of secondary canals in total which were built to irrigate the
project area of 600 ha. Currently it is estimated that only 300 ha are now irrigated and this is because of
the recent rehabilitation undertaken approximately 4 years ago, when 60% of the canal network was
repaired. This part of the system still remains in good condition, however the tail end of both the right and
left branches of the scheme need rehabilitation (they are not currently lined and no structures have been

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

24
rehabilitated). The current condition of the irrigation infrastructure imposes a partial constraint on current,
original and future scheme.

The condition of the dam and reservoir presents a few concerns. The reduction in live storage capacity
due to the inflow of silt is of concern for the continued supply of water since it could block the upstream
bottom outlet chamber such that the outlet cannot be operated, it will therefore need to be raised every
few years. Given the rate of siltation it is estimated that the current live storage capacity will be halved
within 12 years and within 25 years the entire storage capacity will be full with silt. The reservoir
therefore imposes a partial constraint on the original, current and future use of the scheme. A total of
9.5km of main canal and 4kms of secondary canal and 5.1kms and 5kms of secondary canals on the left
branch are planned to be rehabilitated.

Figure THE PROPOSED PROJECT-14 Aerial View of Zharrez Reservoir

5.3.4 Condition of Dams and Reservoirs

The Feasibility Study by Mott MacDonald provides a synopsis of the current condition of the dams and
I&D schemes under review. Whilst the I&D rehabilitation has been mentioned in the previous section, the
condition of the dams and reservoirs are summarised in Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-7 below.
Essentially all dams require some rehabilitation work; some more than others. For example, Koshnica 1
needs to have the dam rebuild due to a historic slip, Murriz Thana, Staravecke and TPlan all have some
stability issues than need to be addressed. A geotechnical survey is planned to be undertaken at all 14 sites
during the detailed design stage which will take place during the first year of the WRIP (indicated as
Phase 2 in the Mott MacDonald Study). Siltation is a significant concern at Belesova and Zharrez.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

25
5.3.5 Dam Rehabilitation Works Proposed
The Feasibility Study by Mott MacDonald provides details of the main rehabilitation works to be
undertaken at the dams under review. This is summarised in Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-8 below.
The full extent of the works however will not be known until after the detailed design. An important
issue however is that four sites are intended to have their crest raised by between 0.3 and 0.5 metres
(Zharrez, Slanica, Belesova and Duhanas). This will increase the reservoir area at TWL and may impact
slightly on shorelines surrounding the mentioned reservoirs. Exact details of the extent of the flooded area
at TWL are not known at this stage, but will become apparent during the detailed design. However, the
Consultant has ascertained that these reservoirs are surrounded by state owned land and will not impact
on private properties.

In the case of Duhanas the proposed option from the FS includes installing a spillway with a sill set 0.5m
above current sill level to increase the storage capacity of the dam. This will also imply installation of a
new wave wall. This increase in crest level is on the spillway and therefore does not impact upon the dam
width which remains unchanged. It is considered that this increase in live storage capacity will also
benefit downstream users.

In the case of Belesova the proposed option from the FS includes reconstructing the spillway with a sill
set 0.3m above current sill level to increase the storage capacity of the dam and two sill traps constructed
on the main streams in the catchment area. The increase in the silt level is on the spillway and therefore
does not impact upon the dam width which remains unchanged. It is considered that this increase in live
storage capacity will also benefit downstream users and also the operational times of the hydropower
installation on this dam. However the HPP concessionaire will need to abide by the operating rules that
will be established in consultation with other parties and facilitated by the river basin agency.

In the case of Zharrez the proposed option from the FS includes enlarging the spillway weir set 0.5m
above current spillway level to increase the storage capacity of the dam and a parapet wall. This increase
in sill level is on the spillway and therefore does not impact upon the dam width which remains
unchanged. It is considered that this increase in live storage capacity will benefit downstream users.

In the case of Slanica the proposed option from the FS includes modifying the spillway sill level to be
0.5m above current spillway level to increase the storage capacity of the dam. This also necessitates an
enlarged length of sill and a parapet wall to ensure free board requirements are met. This increase in sill
level is on the spillway and therefore does not impact upon the dam width which remains unchanged. It
is considered that this increase in live storage capacity will also benefit downstream users.

Further details on these specific dams and the effects on any land take regarding the increase TWL are
discussed in the individual site specific ESMPs. The ESIA Consultant has also checked the dams in terms
of OP 4.37 Safety of Dams. The OP 4.37 will of course be triggered and will require due diligence to
ensure that dam safety measures are in place. All dams are pre-existing and hence fall under paragraphs
7-11 inclusive of OP 4.37 (existing dams and dams under construction). With the exception of Tregtan 2
(10 metres in height) all the can be classified as large dams as they are more than 15 metres in height. In
the case of Koshnica 1 this may need complete reconstruction so this could fall under paragraph 2-6 of
OP 4.37.

CEIA
 Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

26
Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-7: Details on the current condition of dams and reservoirs
Keep water
Feeder Freeboard
Stability level low until
# Dam Main Problem and issues canal in capacity Siltation Downstream Flooding Risk
Problems after works
function Adequate
complete
Negligible effect. At present kept -2m
Recent slip on upstream face
Spillway Some below TWL. Mini HPP planned.
1 Murriz Thana Dam Slips on downstream face Yes Yes Yes (kept down)
needed concern Likely reservoir to be held at TWL all
Erosion problems downstream year round once works completed.
Fair condition Yes but Marginally Limited
2 Kurjan Dam None apparent No Negligible effect.
Crest needs to be levelled pump u/s inadequate concern
Needs Negligible effect although new
Old slip downstream face As Kurjan
3 Strum Dam As Kurjan geotechnical No As Kurjan spillway will make flooding
Irregularity upstream face New spillway
survey marginally worse.
Needs
Areas of seepage downstream Not Marginally Limited Small. Works do not include
4 Leminot Dam geotechnical No
Outlet works need rehabilitation applicable inadequate concern increasing capacity of reservoir.
survey
Not Needs Negligible effect although works to
Crest shows historic overtopping Some
5 Duhanas Dam applicable Inadequate geotechnical Yes spillway will make flooding
Some areas of seepage downstream concern
survey marginally worse.
Seepage along new outlet pipe Not Needs Negligible effect. Mini HPP planned.
applicable Significant
6 Belesova Dam Collapse features Inadequate geotechnical Yes Likely reservoir to be held at TWL all
concern
Significant risk of washout failure survey year round once works completed.
Crest and downstream side needs re-
profiling Inadequate, Needs
Not Limited
7 Tregtan 2 Dam Significant wave damage rebuild geotechnical Yes Small catchment, negligible risk.
applicable concern
Outlet works in poor condition spillway survey
Spillway is broken
Spillway broken
Inadequate, Needs
Deep erosion gullies on downstream Limited
8 Tregtan 3 Dam No rebuild geotechnical Yes Small catchment, negligible risk.
Outlet works are poor with significant spillway survey
concern
seepage
Downstream side very wet and steep Inadequate, Needs Small catchment, but changes to
Not Limited
9 Vranisht 2 Dam Significant profiling necessary modify geotechnical Yes spillway could make flooding
applicable concern
Outlet works in poor condition spillway survey marginally worse.
10 Koshnica 1 Dam Dam has failed and needs to be rebuilt No Inadequate, Yes Yes Limited Small catchment, reservoir cannot be
dam failed concern filled until works complete. Marginal

CEIA
 Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Keep water
Feeder Freeboard
Stability level low until
27
# Dam Main Problem and issues canal in capacity Siltation Downstream Flooding Risk
Problems after works
function Adequate
complete
risk of downstream flood risk once
operational.
Very small effect. Likely reservoir to
be held at TWL all year round once
Low spot on dam crest Limited
11 Staravecke Dam No No Yes Yes works completed. Increasing spillway
Dam believed to be on deep historic slip concern
capacity could make downstream
flooding marginally worse.
Downstream outlet pipe thought to be
Catchment very small, reservoir
cracked inside the dam Inadequate,
Limited cannot be filled at present. But after
12 TPlan Dam Causing significant instability, including No rebuild Yes Yes (kept down)
concern works there is a marginal increase in
slip spillway
flood risk downstream.
Not safe to hold water
Moderate catchment, increasing
Needs
Some problems with seepage Not Marginally Significant spillway capacity could make
13 Zharrez Dam geotechnical No
Some erosion problems Applicable inadequate concern downstream flooding marginally
survey
worse
Needs Negligible effect and has a small
Some seepage on left mitre Not Marginally Some
14 Slanica geotechnical No catchment. Slight increase in spillway
Dam crest bare in some places. applicable inadequate concern
survey capacity.
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

Group 1 Dams
Group 2 Dams
Group 3 Dams

CEIA
 Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

28
Table THE PROPOSED PROJECT-8: Details on the main rehabilitation works proposed on dams and reservoirs
Potential Main Remedial Measures Necessary
# Dam Downstream Comments
Downstream Upstream Toe Surface Raise/Reduce
surface
berm berm Drain Re-profiling Dam height
drainage
1 Murriz Thana Dam Yes Yes Yes Excessive leakage and wash out failures
2 Kurjan Dam No significant issues
Creep on upstream face, stability analysis to be done at detailed
3 Strum Dam Yes Yes
design
4 Leminot Dam Yes Yes Yes
Raise spillway
5 Duhanas Dam Yes Toe drain needed to pick up seepage
sill 0.5m
Raise spillway Possible addition of berm depends on geotechnical survey (detailed
6 Belesova Dam Yes Yes
sill 0.3m design)
Possible addition of berm depends on geotechnical survey (detailed
7 Tregtan 2 Dam Yes
design)
If geotechnical investigation prove unacceptable slope stability toe
8 Tregtan 3 Dam Yes Yes
berm is preferred option
9 Vranisht 2 Dam Yes Yes Yes
10 Koshnica 1 Dam Yes Yes Yes Reduce Significant works required due to existing slip plane.
11 Staravecke Dam Yes Yes Reduce 0.6m Previous slip plane underlying dam.
Possible addition of berm depends on geotechnical survey (detailed
12 TPlan Dam Yes Yes
design)
Raise spillway
13 Zharrz Dam Yes Yes Yes
weir 0.5m
Raise spillway Possible addition of berm depends on geotechnical survey (detailed
14 Slanica Dam Yes Yes
sill 0.5m design
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

Group 1 Dams
Group 2 Dams
Group 3 Dams

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
6 BASELINE DATA
This chapter uses data on the physical-biological and human environments (the latter primarily focussing
on socio-economics). The data collected are from existing sources of information, such as the Hydro-
meteorological Atlas, the Physical Geography of Albania (Edition of Albanian Academy of Sciences),
INSTAT ALBANIA, data from the year 2010 and statistical offices of the relevant Communes, the Mott
MacDonald FS which covers the reservoirs that require rehabilitation; and field surveys undertaken for
verification purposes of some data and for additional information when data gaps are identified.

6.1 Location and General Description

Albania is a European country within Europe, situated in the West of the Balkans. The Country is
bordered from the west from the Adriatic Sea and the Ionian Sea which are both parts of the larger
Mediterranean Sea. The country has a variable terrain, constituted by high mountain areas in the north,
east and south, and a lowland plain that lies to the west. By its climate, relief, and other physical features
the country is divided in four main regions, namely:

The Central Mountain Region,

Southern Mountain Region,
Alps, (representing the northern part of Albania) and
Adriatic Lowland in its West.

The Hilly areas (defined as Hilly central Region) are an intermediary zone between the Central Mountain
Region and the pre-Adriatic Lowland. The pre-Adriatic lowlands, are also intermediary territories situated
between hilly zones and the Albanian Adriatic coast (known as Adriatic Lowland).

Albania can also be divided into four agro-ecological zones, namely; Lowlands, Intermediate lands,
Southern Highlands and the Northern & Central Mountains. These agro-ecological zones are classified
by: climate; soils, geomorphology/relief and socio-economic features.

As mentioned in the previous chapter, the project consists on rehabilitation and revitalization of 14 dams
and 13 agricultural reservoirs, located at Northern part of Central Mountain Region, Southern Part of
Central Mountain Region, on Intermediary Zone of Adriatic pre-Lowland Region, on the Intermediary
Zone of Hilly Central Region, and on the Intermediary zone between Hilly Central Region and Southern
Mountain Region; hence there is a broad diversification of different characteristics between the sites.

The Physical Environment

The physical environments of the territories where the 14 dams, 13 reservoirs and associated I&D
schemes are situated are divided into three sub groups that respect their geographical position. These
three groups have quite different biological and-physical characteristics, but the reservoir environments
and their surroundings in one group are quite similar. Key sources of information have been Academic
Atlases (Hydro-meteorological Atlas), thematic maps, the Physical Geography of Albania, the Albanian
Red Books, several scientific studies, and when gaps have been noted, the Consultant has organized field
surveys to collect additional useful information. The FS from Mott MacDonald was also a very useful
documentation source.

There follows details of the physical environment covering climate, geology, topography and
geomorphology soils etc.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

6.2 Climate
2
Albania has a Mediterranean Climate, categorized in several sub-climatic regions. A proportion of the
reservoirs are situated in the Central Mountains zone of Albania, including those sites around Kukes/
Tropoja and Kora.

The others sites are located near to the settlements of Fier, Berat and Lushnje and are either within the
Albanian Western Lowland zone (displaying different physical and biological characteristics) or on the
border with the Central Mountains zone.

The climate is characterized by four seasons, summer, autumn, winter and spring. The other factors that
influence the environmental characteristics of the different groups are geographical position,
geomorphology, hydrology, etc.

Lowland Zones - The reservoirs of Kurjan, Strum, Zharrez and Murriz Thana, are part of districts of Fier
and Lushnje that are part of the Lowland Zone of the southern coastal plain, and have a typical
Mediterranean Climate with hot summer and mild wet winter. Those reservoirs are situated at the
southern part of the Lowland zone (pre Adriatic Lowland). This climate region is generally thought
suitable for growing cereals, vegetables, forages, citrus, olives, and fruit trees.

Intermediate Zone - The reservoirs of Slanica, Belesova and Duhanas, situated in Berat district, has a
climate region not as wet as the other regions under the study, suitable for growing wheat, potatoes,
sunflower, tobacco, vegetables, vineyards and fruit trees. This climate is conditioned from air springs
coming from the Sea coast and entering till the hilly and mountain areas (running on the river valleys).
Such climate is characterized by similar conditions like Southern Highland Zone, but with a hot summer
and not so cold winter.

The Southern Highland Zones - The reservoirs of Koshnica and Leminot, in the Districts of Devolli are
part of the Southern Highlands Zone. This zone has a moderate interior continental climate with cold
winters and warm summers with lass rainfalls compares with other sites under the study.

The climate is similar to the Northern Highland Region, but the geographical position and the
geomorphological condition vary. The influence of the continental climate is greater here than in other
regions of Central Mountains Region of Albania. Ice and snow are natural phenomena that sometimes
start in November and continue until April. Average annual precipitation is 600 to 1200mm/year, with
significant amounts of snow received throughout winter months. Frost also impacts and constrains
agricultural production. This area consists primarily of mountainous terrain, interspersed with productive
agricultural valleys. This area is especially suitable for growing wheat, barley and rye; as well as
vegetables, potatoes and fruits (apples, plums, pears etc.). In this zone forests and pastures dominate.

The North of Central Mountain Zone, where are situated the Tregtan2, Tregtan 3, Vranisht and TPlan
reservoirs, has a climate of the Mediterranean in nature due to the influence of the air streams coming
through the river valleys from the Adriatic Sea to the inner mountain valleys and is formally classified as
an Eastern Mediterranean Mountain Climate. November and December are the wettest months and July
the driest. Given the high mountainous terrain, the majority of land is used for forest and pasture
production, but significant areas are also used for forage crops, wheat, vegetables, potatoes, and fruit
trees. Conversely, from the opposite direction, the Continental influence is very active in this sub-region
overall during winter. Such differences are clearly shown by rises in the air temperatures. For example in
Kukes, the mean temperature for April is 5 C more than in March. The daily amplitude in the autumn and
spring is around 10-15C with a maximum 21.5C. The wettest and coldest season is the winter, and the
hottest and driest one is the summer, with the former being four times as wet as the summer.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table The Physical Environment-9 provides a summary of the general data on climate for the 14 dam and
3
13 reservoir and I&D schemes sites.
Table The Physical Environment-9: General Data on Climate for Dam and Reservoir I&D Schemes Sites
Average Est. Avg.
Dam and Reservoir Average Temp C Evaporatio
Rainfall (mm) Humidity Sun Frost winter soil
# and I&D Scheme n
Min Max (%) Hours Periods temp C at
Name Winter Summer (mm/day)
Winter Summer 10cm depth
1 Murriz Thana Dam 8 to 10 26 to 30 365 77 55-60 2682 Jan-Feb 3.7- 6.3 6
2 Kurjan Dam 8 to 10 26 to 30 365 77 55-60 2792 Jan-Feb 3.7 6.3 6
3 Strumi Dam 8 to 10 26 to 30 365 77 55-60 2792 Jan-Feb 3.7 6.3 6
4 Leminoti Dam -1 to -2 26 277 88 50-85 2423 Dec - Feb 2.7 5.1 1
5 Duhanas Dam 6 to 7 23 to 24 395 106 55-80 2792 Jan-Feb 3.1 5.92 6
6 Belesova Dam 6 to 7 23 to 24 415 113 55-80 2682 Jan-Feb 3.1 5.92 6
7 Tregtan 2 Dam -10 to -15 25 to 26 272 112 45-65 2045 Dec Feb 2.6 4.7 1
8 Tregtan 3 Dam -10 to -15 25 to 26 272 112 45-65 2045 Dec Feb 2.6 4.7 1
9 Vranisht 2 Dam -10 to -15 24 to 25 272 112 45-65 2045 Dec - Feb 2.6 4.7 1
10 Koshnica 1 Dam -10 to -15 24 277 88 55-65 2423 Dec - feb 2.5 4.7 1
11 Staravecke Dam -5 to -6 22 to 23 395 106 55-65 2414 Jan-Feb 2.5 4.4 6
12 TPlan Dam -15 to -20 24 644 201 60-65 2045 Dec-Feb 2.6 4.8 1
13 Zharrez Dam 8 to 10 26 to 30 365 77 55-60 2792 Jan-Feb 3.7 5.9 6
14 Slanica 6 to 7 23 to 24 365 77 55-80 2792 Jan - Feb 3.1 5.92 6
Source: Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

6.2.1 Rainfall
Lowland Zone where is situated the Zharrez, Kurjan, Strum and Murriz Thana reservoirs, has an average
annual rainfall is 800-1200 mm, of which 70-75% falls during autumn and winter, while in the summer
5% -12% of annual precipitation falls. Generally July and August are dry months, with scarce rainfall that
is not enough for plant growth and development. Irrigation to address the soil moisture deficit is therefore
necessary during these months.

Intermediary Zones - Slanica, Belesova and Duhanas reservoirs, situated in Berat district, have an
average annual rainfall of between 800 - 2500mm/year. The rainfall in winter is significant, and in the
Berat area during the period from October to April, which is the period of wheat's development, on
average approximately 90% of the annual precipitation falls, which makes it necessary for land drainage.
In the months between May and September 12% of precipitation falls, with 7% falling during June-
August.

South Highland Zone - Rainfall has a lower intensity and abundance in relation with other territories of
the region (600-680mm/year). The wettest month is December and the coldest one the January. The daily
maximum of rainfalls is 76mm. The wind has regional and local characteristics, conditioned mostly by
the relief of the area.

Northern and Central Highland Zone - Average annual precipitation goes from 800 to 2500 mm/year.
Precipitation is winter dominant and given the terrain the area is exposed to significant amounts of
snowfall and frost days Precipitation is heavily dependent upon relief and maximum rainfall ranges from
75mm/day to 230mm/day. Average sub regional precipitation is around 1,500mm per year. Snow and ice
occurrence is a normal phenomenon in the winter season. The average number of snowy day per year
varies from around 5 days in flat lying areas and open valleys to more than 100 days per year in the
highland areas.

6.2.2 Temperature
The Lowland Zone where has an annual mean temperatures in this zone range from 14 C - 18C, with
temperatures during summer averaging 26 C, whilst winter temperatures average 10C. The zone is

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

characterized by a hot summer, sometime goes up to 35 C, but only for few days. The winter is not very
4
cold. In both seasons the temperatures are conditioned from the strong influence of Adriatic Sea.

The intermediary zone has some temperatures that ranges between the Southern Highland Zone (Southern
part of Central mountain Region) and the Lowland Zone (Adriatic Coastal Lowland Zone). Annual Mean
temperature varies from 5C - 16C. Mean temperature is highly variable across this zone and declines
moving from the south to the north and with increased elevation The Southern Highland Zone - The
Annual Mean temperature decline moving west to east away from the coast, ranges from 6 C - 14C.
Summer temperatures average 18C-20C, whilst winter temperatures average in the low single digits.
The hottest months are in July and August with the average of temperatures range from 18 C to 24C. The
daily amplitudes sometimes are 19.7 C. In this area are registered the absolute minimum temperatures
ever experienced in Albania (Voskopoje -30.4 C and Sheqeras -26.9C).

The North of the Central Mountain Zone - The Annual Mean temperature goes from 3 C - 12C. The large
range in annual mean temperature is primarily due to elevation. Maximum temperatures in July reach
25C, whilst winter minimum temperatures can reach -20 C.

6.2.3 Wind
On the highlands of Northern Central Mountain Zone, the Southern Central Mountain Zone and in the
Intermediary Zones - winds are influenced by the geomorphology of the area; hence the specific site
characteristics are important. For example, the four sites at Kukes and close to Tropoja are influenced by
the shape of the Drini valley. The same situation occurs in the valley of Devolli and Osum, Branches of
the Seman River. It is quite a different situation on the reservoirs situated in Fier and Lushnje. Here the
wind is strongly influenced by the air movements from the sea to the earth and vice versa. This wind,
conditioned from changes of temperatures from the Sea (from the west) to the land (the east) has a
general west/east/west direction. However, at each site, the dominant winds are those with local
characteristics. The most predominant are the horizontal winds, running in respect with the valley
direction. The permanent winds with low intensity, but with high abundance are vertical winds which are
caused by temperature differences between the lower areas and upper mountain or hilly areas. Such winds
are called wind of the slopes.

6.2.4 Ambient Air Quality

In recent years, air quality is monitored at 15 stations in 7 main cities of the Albania, comprising 7
stations in Tirana, 3 in Elbasan and one to each of Shkodra, Durres, Kora, Fier and Vlora respectively.
These sites are considered as the most sensitive areas. The elements monitored at these stations are: PM 10,
LNP, NO2, SO2, O3, and Pb. The indicators of SO 2, O3, NO2, and Pb are in respect with EU and Albanian
Standards.

The ambient air conditions at the reservoirs sites is generally good under natural circumstances and not
contaminated by any pollutants, as they are quite far away from the cities or industrial areas. Furthermore,
there appear to be no major development activity close to the reservoirs that can affect the air quality,
such as quarries, industrial plants, intensive transport etc.

6.3 Geology
The geology of the areas around the dam and reservoir sites are quite different. The Central Mountain
Region contains tectonic areas referred to as Korab, Mirdita and a good proportion of Kraste/Cukal and
Kruja. The area consists mostly on terrigen formations of reschps of Palaeozoic, Flysch and mollasic
deposits. The most abundant rocks are magmatic, effusive sedimentary and calcareous formations. These
geologic formations have been affected by powerful neo-tectonic movements of Plio-quaternary, which
continues until the present day. The geology of TPlan reservoir is represented by ultra-basic rocks lying

CEIA
 Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

within the Jurassic evaporite area. The Koshnica reservoir is represented by Aleurolite formations of
5
Pliocene age (Helmes Suite). The Leminot reservoir lies in an area of grey marine clays, sands, clays and
coal of the Lower Aquitanian formation.

The Intermediary zones, have quite different geological characteristics. The area is situated between
Southern Mountain Region, in its South, Western Adriatic Lowland in its West and Central Mountain
Region in its East. This Eastern Area, where is situated the Staravecke Reservoir, lies between three
tectonic areas, Kruja, Ionian and Sazani respectively. Jurassic calcareous deposits characterize the eastern
extreme of the area. The Staravecke reservoir lies in an area of Palaeogene, Lower Oligocene, with Flysch
deposits. The Duhanas reservoir lies in Flysch deposits: sandy clays with limestone layers, of Upper
Oligocene Period. Belesova reservoir is characterized by Middle Oligocene formation of weak marine
sedimentary deposits of Flysch, containing inter-bedded clay, sand and conglomerate layers. Kurjan/
Strum reservoir lies in an area of Neogene, Pliocene (Rogozhina Suite), Sands, conglomerates. The
Zharrez reservoir lies in an area of Neogene and Pliocene rocks (Helmesi Suite). The Murriz Thana
reservoir is characterized by Quaternary deposits, molasses rocks (L.Bozo, Y Muceku).

6.4 Seismic Conditions

The FS uses pseudo-static analysis to investigate possible impact of seismic activity on slope stability of
the 14 dams. The peak ground acceleration (PGA) for a 475 return period seismic event in the region of
the 14 dams was calculated from seismic research undertaken by Aliaj et al (2004), that also presented a
relationship between PGA and annual probability. The FS consultants have used other guidance from the
United Kingdom also to arrive at a 200 year return period for a operating basis earthquake (OBE). The
peak ground acceleration and seismic coefficient (m/s 2) for pseudo static analysis (m/s2) for the different
dams are shown in Table The Physical Environment-10below
Table The Physical Environment-10: Calculated Seismic Parameters for dams
Seismic Seismic
Peak ground Peak ground
coefficient for coefficient for
Nr. Dam acceleration Nr. Dam acceleration
pseudo static pseudo static
(m/s2) (m/s2)
analysis (m/s2) analysis (m/s2)
1 Murriz Thana Dam 0.28g 0.19g 8 Tregtan 3 Dam 0.21g 0.14g
2 Kurjan Dam 0.28g 0.19g 9 Vranisht 2 Dam 0.21g 0.14g
3 Strum Dam 0.28g 0.19g 10 Koshnica 1 Dam 0.21g 0.14g
4 Leminot Dam 0.32g 0.21g 11 Staravecke Dam 0.17g 0.12g
5 Duhanas Dam 0.25g 0.16g 12 TPlan Dam 0.21g 0.14g
6 Belesova Dam 0.21g 0.14g 13 Zharrez Dam 0.28g 0.19g
7 Tregtan 2 Dam 0.21g 0.14g 14 Slanica 0.28g 0.19g

Duni Ll., Kuka Sh., Kuka N. and Fundo A.(2010) have attempted to improve the probabilistic seismic
hazard map of Albania and this is included as Figure The Physical Environment-15 below with the
locations of the 14 dam sites superimposed on it.

Notwithstanding, it is recognised that the whole of Albania is in an area of seismic activity so even though
pseudo static loading analysis has been performed, there are still many input parameters that have been
estimated; including the natural geological conditions beneath the dams. Until a more ground
investigations and geotechnical analysis are performed by the FS consultant during phase 2 (the detailed
design stage) of their project, the seismic coefficient data needs to be treated with caution.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Figure The Physical Environment-15: Location of dam and I&D sites in relation to seismic hazard probability

6.5 Topography and Geomorphology

The Kukes and southern Tropoja region, where the first group of dams are located are part of the northern
section of the Central Mountains Region. The formation and development of the area is related to ultra-
basic formations of Kam-Tropoja and limestone of the Cretaceous period. The horizontal relief
fragmentation changes from 1-3km/km 2 in the western side to 1km/km 2 in the eastern side11. The TPlan
stream links TPlan depression with Tropoja depression. The stream has created the gorge of TPlan that
is 3 km long. The highest point of this area is the Maja e Gjate at 1,038m, aligned in a north-south
direction. Another interesting geomorphological feature of this region is the Tropoja depression an area 19
km long, situated between Morina Gorge and Gri village, which is of tectonic origin. The main surface

11
Fragmentation of relief is a measure of the degree of erosion and weathering within a landscape and is based upon the measure of
the amount of length of linear features (valleys) per square kilometres of land.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

waters of this area are the Valbona River and its smaller streams, the Gashi and the Tropoja Rivers.
7
Horizontal fragmentation is around 1-3km/km 2. The vertical fragmentation of the relief ranges from 50-
100km/km2 to 200-300m/km2.

Some of the reservoirs are part of the Kora depression, which is a relatively flat area about 35km long
lying between Morava Mountains, Malit te Thate, Cerrava and Gora highlands. The average altitude of
the depression is 137m. Horizontal fragmentation is 0.1 to 0.5 km/km 2. The area is characterized from
water sources from the Mali I Thate highlands which include streams of Gjonomadh, Damjanec, of Uji I
Bardhe, Kamenica, Mborja etc. The streams activity regarding the moderation of the relief is
considerable. The morphology of the field periphery has karstic characteristics. The depression is
surrounded by a range of hills such as Vlocishti, Kora etc.

The Eastern part of Intermediary zone geomorphology, is related to the geological structure and the
activity of the Staravecke stream. The valley is U-shaped and is filled with sediment. . The eroded slopes
continue in the valley to the reservoir. The relief of the area takes the form of five separate terraces
(implying different periods of river rejuvenation) that are filled with sediment.

To the West, where are situated the majority of reservoirs in Fier and Lushnje districts, the topography in
this area is generally flat to undulating. The reservoir sites are situated in the soil deposits between ranges
of hills that are aligned in a north south direction. The higher points of the hills range from 300 to 600
masl.

6.6 Soil Characteristics

The soil characteristics are quite different throughout the different reservoir and dam sites and are heavily
dependent upon the underlying geology, flora and vegetation types, climate and exposure, water presence
and effects etc. In the more elevated areas, the soils are prone to heavy erosion. For example, in the upper
layer of soils in areas under the study situated in Kukes and Tropoja there are reddish thin layers of
silicate alternating with carbonates.

In the area of Murriz Thana dam and I&D scheme in the Lushnje Region and Strum, Kurjan and Zharrez
schemes of Fier Region soils are characterized by sandstones and mudstones. Soil classifications of these
reservoirs are characterized by Grey-brown soils. They have an accumulative origin, conditioned by river
activity and through sediment transport and deposition. The thin soil layers range from 1.2m-1.8m in
summer and 0.4m-0.5m in winter. The soils have an average humus and nitrogen content; the meadows of
dark grey-brown soils in the Lushnje area have a high humus content (4.3%), nitrogen content (0.22%)
and phosphorus content (0.12%). They are rich in CaCO 3 (Calcium Carbonate) and have a neutral
reaction with a water pH - 6.8. The absorbing compound is of 50% and the terminal infiltration for
Lushnje commune is 0.4mm/min -1.6mm/min and for Fier commune 2.3mm/min - 5.5mm/min (ref. Motts
FS). Such soil characteristics create very good condition for the development of agriculture and farming
in Lushnje and Fier.

The soil of the Slanica, Belesova and Duhanas reservoirs and I&D schemes, in Berat Region, represents a
mixture of alluvial and brown mountainous soils and a good part of them are prone to erosion. The land
has a middle sub-clay structure, with low phosphorus and humus (6-9%) content, an average nitrogen and
calcium content and water pH of 5.5-6. The saturation is high at 90-95% (ref - FS Mott MacDonald). The
soils of Koshnica and Leminoti schemes are formed by a mixture of alluvial, brown mountainous and
grey forest soils and highly prone to erosion. The lands are covered by sandy sedimentary formations, and
on ultra-basic rocks and limestone, and with a clay trend. They are rich in organic matter, the pH is
slightly acidic and they are rich in nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. They have good physical quality
and high potential fertility (Motts FS).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

8
In terms of the Word Soil Reference Base Classification (WRC) the following soil types are found:
Arenosols: are soils very little developed with a rough texture (rougher than sand) counterbalanced with
sandy -loam or approximately sub-sandy (SS) and sandy (S) according to the national terminology, in a
depth level of at least 100 cm from the land surface. Arenosols are leached soils and often decalcified.
Phaeozem: are dark mineral abundant in organic substances, influenced from the climate. These lands
have an A horizon - Molic about 30 cm followed by a brown B horizon Cambic. They have high alkali
saturation over 50 %.
Regosols are shallow soils created by both stable matter, mainly from gravels. Those are
characterized by low level of humus. In small fraction of soils they have the following characteristics:
humus 1.2 -2.2 % , Nitrogen (N) 0.18-0.28%, Phosphate (P 205) 1.4 - 2.5 mg/100 gr /soil and Potassium
(K20) 9.5 - 12 mg/100 gr soils. They are of neutral nature, and pH ranges from 7.4 - 7.8. These soils have
a high level of Ca= 25%.
Leptosol soils are shallow soils (less than 30 cm deep) lying on he strong rocks or calcareous rocks. In
general they have neutral reaction, where pH goes from 6.5 to 7.5. Cationic exchange capacity is around
20 - 30 mek /100 gr ,humus values goes from 1.5 to 2.5 % , N 0.10 - 0.15% ,P205 - about 2 mg /100 gr
soils and K20 from 8 - 12 mg /100 gr soils.
Cambisol: are soils with limited age, with transitional characteristics. With light acid reaction. (pH
5.5-6.5) to neutral and light basic (pH 6.5 -8.0) with high levels of Organic Carbon, that goes from 0.3 -
1.7
Luvisol: are mineral soils with a horizon B-Clay, saturation in base with 50% or higher, in all B horizons.
Their acid/base ratio range from pH 6.0 to 7.5). The B horizon has a neutral nature.
Vertisol: are considered as soils with high values of concentration of heavy metals. They have high
saturation over 80% and neutral reaction that tends to be lightly basic (alkaline), pH (H20).

The Vranisht, Tregtan2 and Tregtan 3 reservoirs have three types of soils present: Cambisol, Luvisol,
Regosol. TPlan reservoir has two types of soils, namely Leptosol, Regosol, Murriz Thana reservoir area
is characterized by three types of soils that are Luvisol, Vertisol, Cambisol. Kurjan, Strum, Zharrez and other
areas have similar soils characteristics, determined predominantly by Arenosols, Phaeozem, Luvisol, Fluvisol
and Cambisol (with characteristics as described above) Soil erosion is a major problem in Albania and
especially within the Seman Basin, where proportionally more soil is lost every year compared to other parts
of Albania (see Table The Physical Environment-11).
Table The Physical Environment-11: Soil Erosion in River Basins in Albania
Basin Area Total Quantity per year
River (ton/km2)/year (ton/ha)/year
(km2) (tons x 1000)
Drini 11,756 1,543 15.43 18,145
Semani 5,649 3,085 30.85 17,429
Other Rivers 18,330 1,628 16.28 29,844
Total Territory of Albania 35,735 1,831 18.31 65,418
Source: Adapted from Qiriazi and Sala (1999)12

6.7 Surface Hydrology and Groundwater

For water management purposes, Albania is divided into six (eight) river basins (Drin-Buna, Matt, Ishem-
Erzen, Shkumbin, Seman and Vjose). One third of these basin areas are situated outside the state borders
of Albania (i.e. Montenegro, Macedonia, Kosovo and Greece). Total annual water flow rate is 39.22
billion m3/year of which 95% discharge into the Adriatic Sea and only 5% into the Ionian Sea. There are

12
Qiriazi P- Sala S,1999, Mass Movement in Albania + Human Activities Japanese Geomorphological Union, 20/3, p.p. 251-264.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

two different characteristic periods in terms of flow; a wet period (from October to May) with 86% of the
9
annual flows; and a dry period (from June-September), with 14%.

Albania is rich in water resources with lakes, rivers, springs and lagoons, with a high quantity of available
water. As mentioned above, the Albanian territory covers about 65% of a total watershed area of 43,905
km2. More than 152 streams and small rivers finally form the eight large rivers and their reaches (in kms)
are as follows: Buna (41 km), Drini (285 km), Mati (115 km), Ishmi (74 km), Erzeni (109 km),
Shkumbini (181 km), Semani (281 km), and Vjosa (272 km), which run southeast to northwest towards
the Adriatic coast. A map of the basins and the locations of the dams is shown in Figure The Physical
Environment-16 below.

Source: Adapted from www.wikipedia.com

Figure The Physical Environment-16: Location of dam and I&D sites in relation to river basins

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Albanian rivers are characterized by a high flow rate; the total annual mean flow is 1,308 m 3.s-1 that
10
corresponds to an annual water volume of 42.25 x 109 m 3 from which 30% belongs to subterranean
waters (groundwater). This accounts for more than 13,000 m 3 capita-1.year-1. The rivers, are fed mainly
by precipitation (69%), and show a typical Mediterranean regime, with a seasonal variation in the flow
rate, with high flow during October to May.

Lakes occupy about 4% of the country, which include three big lakes and 247 small lakes. There are also
650 reservoirs with a capacity of around 5.6 billion m 3 of accumulative water, designed and built along
the river, serving for irrigation, flood protection and generation of electricity.

Underground waters are numerous and contribute with about 23% of the total annual flow. They are
spread throughout the country and are exploited through natural outflows and wells, serving mainly for
drinkable water in 80% of cities in the country, while a very small part of them are used for irrigation,
mainly in the western lowlands.

6.7.1 Waters of the Seman River and Drini-Buna River

The Intermediary Zone reservoirs are located mostly within the Seman Valley which is the principle river
of the area. The Seman is composed by several branches, where the most important are those of Osum
River and the Devolli River (see Figure The Physical Environment-16 ). The Seman is 281 km long and
has a basin area of 5,949km2. The average altitude of the river is 863m. The river gradient is around
3.6m/km or 3.6%. The Osum is one of the main branches of the Seman and is 161 km long. It basins is
2,150km2 with an average altitude of 828m. The river discharges an average of 32.5/m 3/s with a discharge
module of 17.5l/s per km2. Close to Kuove the Osum joins the Devolli River and becomes the Seman
River downstream.

The Southern Part of Central Mountain Region is very rich in surface waters that are derived from lakes
and rivers. The main lakes are those of Prespa and Ohrid. Both lakes are trans-boundary lakes, the former
representing the division between Albania and Macedonia; and the latter between Albania, Macedonia
and Greece. The lakes have international importance and have a specific conservation status. Devolli
River is the largest branch and the main source of supply of the Seman River and is 196km long and has
an average altitude of 960m. The multi-year average of discharges ranges around 95.7m 3/s, with a
discharging module of 17l/s/km 2. The Devolli River feeds the Seman River with about 88% of its waters.
Due to the underlying geological characteristics of the basin (e.g. limestone, karst) when the rivers are
flowing, the Seman River has relatively high mineralization content (TDS 440mg/litre).

The Highland Zone/Northern Part of Central Mountain Region is dominated by the Drini River Basin
(comprising Black Drin (Drini I Zi) and White Drin (Drini I Bardhe) rivers). The Drini is the longest river
of Albania and the basin area includes the land up to the confluence with the Buna River close to Shkodra
Lake, where combined (named the Buna River) they discharge into the Adriatic Sea. Both rivers
discharge about 21.4 Mm3 per year and the discharge coefficient of river flows is 0.64 for Drini and 0.90
for the Buna.

The main sources of the Drini River are surface catchments (like the Drini I Bardhe River) and smaller
streams in the upper catchment which are all fed by rainfall. The main sources for Buna River are
Shkodra Lake and the Drini River. The total catchment area of the Drini Basin is 14,173 km 2, from which
5,870 km2 lie within Albania and the remainder within Kosovo, Macedonia and Greece. The average
altitude for the basin is 971m. From a morphological and hydrographic point of view the river basin is
divided into three parts, the upper, middle and lower reaches. All the reservoir sites in question lie within
the middle reach of the basin.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

All Albanian rivers including the Drini and Buna are characterized by high amount of sediment
11
transportation primarily caused by soil erosion which is caused, in part, by deforestation activities in the
catchment. Table The Physical Environment-12 below provides general parameters on Drini and Buna
rivers.
Table The Physical Environment-12: General Hydrological Characteristics of the Drini and Buna Rivers
Rivers Qmaks l/sec/km2 Qmin l/sec/km2
Drini river (Black Drin and White Drin) 35.7 7
Black Drin 23.3 7
Buna river 53.6 10

The hydrological monitoring network on the Drin and Seman basins is quite limited. Data has been
acquired from four gauges in operation and these are shown in Table The Physical Environment-13 below
together with indications of flood peaks and 20, 50 and 100 year return periods. As can be seen the
extreme rainfall experienced in the two basins in 1962-63 was very close to a 1 in 50 year flood event.

Table The Physical Environment-13: Gauging Stations within Drin and Seman catchments and major flood events
Q m3/s
Flood 62-63 Floods 70-71
With return period
Area 100 50 20
No River Station Q m3/s Date Q m3/s Date
km2 Years Years Years
1 Drini Vau Dejes 13650 5180 13.01 1900 1.01 6530 5870 4850
2 Devolli Kozare 3122 1250 16.11 1240 1.01 1570 1390 1150
3 Osum Ura Vajguror 2073 1100 16.11 1050 1.01 1270 1130 958
4 Seman Ura Kucit 5358 1800 16.11 1870 1.01 2160 1975 1730
Source: Kolaneci 13

Recent work undertaken from Pano and Avdyli (2009) has calculated the average monthly discharge for
the Drini and Seman rivers based on data between the years 1948 2004. The following Table The
Physical Environment-14 below provides indications on the monthly average discharge for the Drini and
Seman Rivers.
Table The Physical Environment-14: Average Monthly Discharge on the Drini and Seman Rivers
Monthly Average Discharge (m3/sec) Annual Coeff.
avg. of
Rivers
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Discharge discharge
m3/sec Cv
Drini 493 459 446 507 490 293 155 104 141 228 396 501 351 0.30
Seman 143 156 161 143 116 52 20 12 22 41 100 117 90 0.34
Source: Pano, N. and Avdyli B. (2009) 14

In the 1996 Water Law which his currently in force there is no provision for minimum environmental
flow. However, Albania in its strive for EU Accession has now prepared a draft Water Management Law,
which is based upon the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) most notably WFD Article 4 paragraphs
3-5. There is provision within this draft law for minimum environmental flow. It now is a requirement for
minimum environmental flows to be specified in the River Basin Management Plans (RBMP). The
WRIP Component 3, Part C will be preparing RBMP for Drin and Seman river basins. The RBMP under
WRIP will also provide the framework to address hydropower plant and irrigation and drainage allocation
issues with involvement of the River Basin Agency .

13
Kolaneci M., 2000, Flood Risks in Albania, The World Bank Group, Rural Development, from http://wbln0018.worldbank.org.
14
Pano, N., and Avdyli B., 2009 A method to estimate Buna Discharge, Albania Hydrology Days 2009.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

6.7.2 Groundwater
12
The reservoir sites are widely dispersed throughout Albania. Considering the water genesis and
hydrological conditions, the reservoir areas under the study are characterized from two types of
groundwater; shallow groundwater and deeper artesian groundwater.

Artesian groundwater are deep and phreatic and found mostly in weak sandy and gravel rocks, such as at
Kora and Bilisht, where the Leminot and Koshnica reservoirs are situated. Such groundwater generally
occurs in synclinal type structures where the nature of the sedimentary beds creates artesian pressure.

Whole/Break Waters (in Albanian uje I poreve/carjeve) contains deposits of sand/clay of Mio-Pliocene.
Such waters have low pressure. The Karstic waters, are strongly related to carbonate rocks (Calcareous
and Dolomites), and sulphate rocks (Gypsum and Anhydrites). Usually such rocks have extensive jointing
and fracturing and are the main source of water for Albania. These waters are the main source for
irrigation and industrial supply purposes.

6.7.3 International Waterway Status and Downstream Water Users

International waterways
As mentioned previously, the Drin River has two tributaries the Black Drin and the White Drin. The
Black Drin originates in Macedonia and flows into Albania (see Figure The Physical Environment-16 ).
The White Drin originates in Montenegro, flows into Albania, and meets with the Black Drin in Albanian
territory. The Drin River meets at the outskirts of Shkodra with the Buna River, which flows from
Shkodra Lake (an international lake shared with Albania and Montenegro) to the Adriatic Sea.
Furthermore, the Drin and Seman Rivers are recipients of irrigation water that both eventually flow into
the Adriatic Sea, an international waterway. This implies that WB OP 7.50 is triggered and riparian should
be notified by Albania, unless there are adequate grounds for exception.

Out of the 14 rehabilitation subprojects identified for the first year of WRIP, four sites lie within the Drin
catchment, a transboundary river, namely Tregtan 2, Tregtan 3, Vranisht 2 and TPlan. The remaining
sites all lie within the Seman Basin which flows entirely within Albania and exists to the Adriatic.

In contemplating OP 7.50, the Consultant believes that an exception to this safeguard should be
considered for all the 14 sites for the following reason.

The project essentially involves the rehabilitation of existing dams, reservoirs and I&D schemes and does
not involve works and activities that would exceed the original irrigation scheme footprint, change its
nature, or alter and expand its scope and extent to make it appear a new or different scheme.

Consequently, the project team has determined that given the nature of the rehabilitation works envisaged
under the project, the project falls under the exception set forth in paragraph 7 (a) of OP 7.50 as (i) it will
not adversely affect the quality or quantity of water flows to other riparian users; and (ii) it will not be
adversely affected by other riparians water use. Furthermore, paragraph 7 (c) of O.P 7.50 applies as both
the Drin and the Seman rivers are in Albania, the lowest downstream riparian state and the project will not
cause appreciable harm to other states.

Water Users
The 14 dams and I&D schemes located within the Drin and Seman Rivers are generally within the middle
reaches of their respective river basins, with the exception of Koshnica1 and Leminot that lie more in the
upper reaches of the Devolli River (upstream part of Seman).

There is substantial competition for use of the water resources of the Drin and Seman basins. Hydropower
is of particular importance on the Drin, with major dams and associated power stations located upstream

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

in Macedonia and downstream in the middle and lower reaches of the river in Albanian territory, where
13
hydropower accounts for more than 85% of the Countrys total electricity supply. The Seman is also
becoming more important for hydropower with new HPPs planned on the Devolli and Seman tributaries.

Besides hydropower the Drin and Seman are also important as a water resource for irrigation, livestock,
fisheries, industry and for drinking water. In addition, both basins face a number of threats to their water
quality, such as pollution mainly from discharges of untreated wastewater from cities. The exceptional
biodiversity and endemic species of the Drin Basin as well as those on the Seman River (i.e. particularly
those on the Karevasta Lagoon adjacent to the Adriatic) are also under threat without improved and
coordinated ecosystem management.

From an international perspective and to address the situation on the Drin, the five River Riparians signed
a Memorandum of Understanding on a Shared Strategic Vision for the Sustainable Management of the
Drin River Basin in November 2011. Recent floods highlighted the need for such closer transboundary
cooperation. The Drin Dialogue process, as it is called, was originally set up in 2009 to look into the
many competing interests and challenges the Riparian states were facing. The Shared Strategic Vision
identified the challenges at the transboundary level such as:

Improving access to comprehensive data and adequate information

Developing cooperation and measures to minimize flooding
Improving management and appropriate disposal of solid wastes
Decreasing pollution of nutrients and hazardous substances such as heavy metals and pesticides
Minimizing the effects of the building of dams and other changes of the water system.

Albania is also a signatory of the Convention for the protection of the Mediterranean Sea against
pollution (Barcelona Convention) and its relevance in this context is that pollution from land based
resources (including irrigation) through the Drin and Seman rivers should be prevented and addressed.

6.8 Water Quality

The transformation of the Albanian economy to an open market during the past decade caused a
significant damage to the natural resources of the country, mainly to natural waters, most of them being
the most exposed and unprotected ones. The situation is especially dramatic in the Albanian western
lowlands where most of the rivers cross on their way to the Adriatic Sea.

This region became heavily populated and most urban and industrial waste is disposed directly into the
rivers. Alas, there are now severe environmental problems in these areas, directly or indirectly linked to
aquatic ecosystems, like urban and industrial waste management, water pollution or land erosion. Neither
liquid nor solid waste is controlled, nor are samples taken regularly of surface and groundwater.

The Albanian rivers are characterized from high intensity of erosion activity and high turbidity. The Drini
River in which the northern sites of TPlan, Vranisht 2 and Tregtan 2 and 3 are located, have an average
range of erosion and turbidity and thus do not suffer from siltation problems as much as other areas.

It is quite another situation with the Seman River and its tributaries (Devolli and Osum). The meandering
nature of these rivers changes the rivers courses over the years, thus eroding important agricultural lands
and transporting organic matter from eroded soils. Erosion in the upper geological layers fills sediments
with heavy metals, eroded from volcanic rocks. When the eroded rocks are calcareous, calcium is the
predominant element. The clay soils eroded and transported by streams or water currents remains a
problem on sedimentation.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

6.8.1 Drini River Irrigation Water Quality

14
In the Drini River, even taking into account the small pollution sources, this river can be classified within
Albania as a relatively clean river. The following are some parameters of the Drini River water quality.

Electrical conductivity value is (ECW) = 0.3ds/m., TDS 300mg/l, SAR = 0.1. N ++K+/Ca+++Mg++ ratio <
1, when the impermeable value is considered 2, implies that the water has very good proprieties for
irrigation purposes. Furthermore, the ratio Cl-/SO -4 = 1.1, pH = 6.8-7.5, N-NO 3 = 2.7 mg/l, N-NH4 = 1.8
mg/l, P = 0.2 mg/l, K = 1 mg/l all show that the water quality for irrigation purposes is very appropriate.

Recent research (2006-2010) on irrigation water quality from rivers and reservoirs in Albania has shown
that the Drini River is within the State Standard Catalogue (SSC) accepted values. 15 The results are
presented in Table The Physical Environment-15 below.
Table The Physical Environment-15: Water Quality Results from Drini River 2007-2010
SSC
Water parameters Symbols Units Accepted 2007 2008 2009 2010
value
Electrical Conductivity (or) ECw dS/m 0 to 3 0.28 0.27 0.29 0.30
Calcium Ca2+ me/l 0 to 20 1.88 2.15 3.15 3.07
Magnesium Mg2+ me/l 0 to 5 0.94 0.87 1.23 1.02
Sodium Na+ me/l 0 to 40 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.10
Carbonate CO3 2- me/l 0 to 1 0.20 0.30 0.32 0.32
Bicarbonate HCO3 - me/l 0 to 10 1.60 1.92 1.84 1.11
Chloride Cl- me/l 0 to 30 0.40 0.60 0.45 0.36
Sulphate SO4 2- me/l 0 to 20 2.85 0.81 0.30 0.20
Nitrate-Nitrogen NO3-N mg/l 0 to 10 1.12 4.76 3.92 1.84
Ammonium-Nitrogen NH4-N mg/l 0 to 5 0.56 2.24 1.68 1.70
Phosphate-Phosphorus PO4-P mg/l 0 to 2 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.71
Potassium K+ mg/l 0 to 2 0.22 1.03 1.17 1.18
Acid/Basic pH 1-14 6.0 to 8.5 6.80 7.50 7.20 7.10
Sodium Absorption Ratio SAR me/l 0 to 9 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.10
Dried residue DR gr/l-1 - 0.12 0.19 0.16 0.18

The results show a low electrical conductivity, and with a very small variability. The anion and cation
values are within the parameters set by SSC. The content of carbonate was between 0.20-0.32 me/L,
increasing from the first to the fourth sampling year, but still within the acceptable levels of SSC. The
opposite happened with the content of bicarbonate, but again the concentrations are within the norms set
by SSC. Phosphate had relatively high values (max = 0.71 mg L -1) which could be due to an additional
source of P being added to the irrigated soils at the time of sampling. Based on these results, Drini river
water is classified as Class II for irrigation.

6.8.2 Seman River Irrigation Water Quality

Some investigations have also been undertaken on the water quality of the Seman River. The following
are given some general data on water quality and heavy metals in sediments (see Table The Physical
Environment-16).
Table The Physical Environment-16: Water Quality from the Seman River

15
Abazi U., and Balliu A., 2012, Evaluation of irrigation water quality across major water resources in Albania during a five year
monitoring process in Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, Volume 10 pp 919-924

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Max values of heavy metals in Max values of heavy

Physical chemical Mean Nutrient Max values of heavy sediments
15
parameters Levels metals in waters
Min Max metals in algae
Cladophora
Pb = 2.9 N-NO3(mg/l) Pb = 2.9 Pb = 1.03 Pb = 9.46 Pb = 5.6
Cd =3.2 1.26 Cd = 3.2 Cd = 0.02 Cd = 0.06 Cd = 0.25
Cu =2.7 N-NO2(g/l) Cu = 2.7 Cu = 38.4 Cu = 144 Cu = 18.9
Zn =20 108.3 Zn = 20 Zn = 17.9 Zn = 47.4 Zn = 117.2
Ni = 16.8 Ni = 16.8 Ni = 131 Ni = 289 Ni = 168.5
N-NH4(mg/l)
Cr =10.0 Cr = 10.0 Cr = 101 Cr = 429 Cr = 231.7
1.84
Mn =110 Mn = 110 Mn = 556 Mn = 990 Mn = 724.4
Fe =0.83 P-PO4(g/l) Fe = 0.83 Fe = 2.37 Fe = 3.82 Fe = 6647
Hg =0.21 43.8 Hg = 0.21 Hg = 0.08 Hg = 0.17 Hg = 0.09
Source: Elaborated from EA of water quality of Albanian Rivers

Hence, the Seman River remains problematic in relation to particulate matter, because of erosion and
sedimentation. The guide limit of CEE for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) is 25 mg/l. The Seman has a
TSS with a max of 436 mg/l! Dissolved Oxygen (DO) is less than 2 mg/l, which implies very poor
status according to NIVA classes (Norwegian Water Agency).

Seman River waters also exceed the ammonium limit of 0.16 mg/l N-NH 4 of EC Directive for cyprinid
waters. Regarding physical-chemical parameters the quality of Seman River waters can be considered as
fair, poor to very poor. From a heavy metals point of view, the Seman River can be considered as
markedly polluted. Still in the upper and middle reaches the pollution is not really present. It should be
mentioned that this situation is principally related to human activities, especially in the lower reaches of
the river due to intensively inhabited areas and cities.

More recent research (2006-2010) on irrigation water quality from rivers and reservoirs in Albania has
shown that the Seman River is within the State Standard Catalogue (SSC) accepted values. Samples have
been taken and are shown in Table The Physical Environment-17 below
Table The Physical Environment-17: Water Quality Results from Seman River 2007-2010
SSC
Water parameters Symbols Units Accepted 2007 2008 2009 2010
value
Electrical Conductivity (or) ECw dS/m 0 to 3 0.54 0.40 0.42 0.20
Calcium Ca2+ me/l 0 to 20 2.60 1.50 4.20 2.20
Magnesium Mg2+ me/l 0 to 5 2.70 1.20 1.90 1.00
Sodium Na+ me/l 0 to 40 0.30 1.60 1.40 1.10
Carbonate CO3 2- me/l 0 to 1 - 0.30 0.40 0.30
Bicarbonate HCO3 - me/l 0 to 10 3.50 2.10 2.50 1.20
Chloride Cl- me/l 0 to 30 0.60 0.60 0.70 0.20
Sulphate SO4 2- me/l 0 to 20 1.80 0.60 0.20 0.20
Nitrate-Nitrogen NO3-N mg/l 0 to 10 0.60 2.20 1.40 2.50
Ammonium-Nitrogen NH4-N mg/l 0 to 5 0.60 1.10 0.30 1.10
Phosphate-Phosphorus PO4-P mg/l 0 to 2 - - 0.90 0.80
Potassium K+ mg/l 0 to 2 2.90 4.70 22.50 0.70
Acid/Basic pH 1-14 6.0 to 8.5 7.30 7.70 7.60 7.20
Sodium Absorption Ratio SAR me/l 0 to 9 0.20 1.40 0.80 0.90
Dried residue DR gr/l-1 - 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.10

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The measurement at this river showed low values of EC (0.20-0.54 dS m -1), nitrate (0.6-2.5 mgL-1) and
16
ammonia (0.3-1.1 mg L-1). Cation and anion concentrations as well as pH values (7.2-7.7), were within
the accepted limits set by the SSC to prevent salt accumulation in soils. During the sampling period, only
potassium K+ concentration in 2009 (22.5 mg L-1) and CO32- concentration from 2008 to 2010 (0.3- 0.4 me
L-1) were above the limits established by the SSC standards. The high K + can be explained by urban
wastewater discharge coming from the city of Fier, which was upstream of the river sampling point, while
the relatively high CaCO3 concentration can be explained by the high carbonate content of the soils and
the parent materials in the Seman basin. Based on these results, the waters of the Seman River can be
classified as Class II for irrigation purposes.

6.8.3 Irrigation Water Quality from Selected Reservoirs and I&D schemes
In the areas of the Zharrez, Slanica, Duhanas and Belesova reservoirs and I&D schemes, erosion is very
active and sediments are deposited in the channels, silting them frequently and reducing their capability.
The same situation is happening in reservoir bodies where substantial siltation is apparent. In some of the
reservoirs the capacity is reduced by more than 60%.

Through an historic evaluation of data, all the reservoirs have appropriate water quality for irrigation,
except the Murriz Thana reservoir, that in the dry season, (mostly in the August and beginning of
September) is characterized by high salinity. Through several chemical analyses, it has been found that in
some years the level of salinity in the reservoir water risks damaging the crops during irrigation. This
high salinity appears to coincide with reduction in flow of the Devolli River. Concentrations of sodium
and chlorine can create toxicity problems in susceptible crops (e.g. most vegetable crops). Hence
application of irrigated water during this time can lead to reduction in crop yields.

Illegal disposal of solid matter or debris close to or in these irrigation channels is polluting these waters.
Furthermore, wastewater generated through rainfall risks being discharged into the reservoir or the
irrigation channels. In Zharrez reservoir, contamination of waters from the nearby oil industry in the past
has occurred. Numerous hotspot removal projects have helped to contain this oil. A more detailed
analysis of the water quality from the Murriz Thana and Zharrez reservoirs will be included and
elaborated on in the site specific ESMPs

The Biological Environment

6.9 Protected Areas
Such Albanian protected areas are those territories, seas or inland waters and territories that represent a
higher value of local, regional, national or global importance from the viewpoint of biodiversity or
habitat, landscape or reproduction capacity that is significant for conservation of natural resources. The
management categories of Albanian Protected Areas are divided in accordance with IUCN categories.
Some 15% of Albanias surface is protected at present. The Albanian Government policy is to increase
these areas regarding environmental protection. The total number of categories of Protected Area and
their surface area are shown in Table The Biological Environment-18 below: Further details of the
protected areas are shown in Annex D.
Table The Biological Environment-18: Details of Protected areas in Albania
No Surface area
Type of Protected Area
Designated (hectares)
Strictly Protected Area 2 4,800
National Parks 15 189,088
Natural Monuments 750 3,470
Nature Managed Reserve 22 2,530

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Protected Landscape / Seascape 5 959

Multiuse Protected Area/ Protected Area of Managed Resources 4 17
18
TOTAL 798 200,865

below provides indications of the protected areas that lie within the districts where the dam and reservoir
sites together with I&D schemes planned for rehabilitation are located. In addition, this information is
also shown on Figure The Biological Environment-17 below. It can be clearly seen that none of the dam,
reservoir and I&D rehabilitation sites are close to these protected areas

Figure The Biological Environment-17: Location of the Project sites in relation to protected areas

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Legend
Strictly Protected Areas National Parks
18
Natural Monuments Natural Managed Reserves

Protected Landscapes Managed Resource Protected Area

Dam and Reservoir Site

Table The Biological Environment-19: Details of Protected areas in Districts containing reservoirs under the study
Reservoirs in Management Surface area
District Name of Protected Area
District Category (hectares)
TPlan Lumi I Gashit (Gashi River) Strict Protected Area 3,000
Tregtan 2
Kukes
Tregtan 3 Lugina e Valbones (Valbona Valley) National Park 8,000
Vranisht 2
Murriz Thana
Kurjan
Fier Divjake/Karavasta National Park 22,230
Strumi
Zharrez
Duhanas
Belesova
Berat Mali I Tomorrit National Park 4,000
Staravecke
Slanica
Dangelli National Park 34,361
Korce/ Leminoti
Prespa National Park 27,750
Gjirokaster Koshnica 1
Bredhi I Hotoves National Park 2,380

This information about protected areas is included as it provides an overall perspective of the area
surrounding the different dam, reservoir and I&D schemes rehabilitation sub-projects. Furthermore, it is
normal procedure when preparing environmental documentation under Albanian law (be it Summary EIA
or Profound EIA) to show the proximity of project sites in relation to such protected areas.

6.10 Flora
Climate, geographical position, presence of water and specific topography are important factors that
influence the abundant green cover, diversity, uniqueness of the vegetation within Albania. Albanian flora
comprise around 3,200 species recorded of which about 15% are characteristic of Balkan environments,
24% exhibit typical Mediterranean characteristics and the remainder are with a Central European origin,
sub-Balkan etc.

The flora of Albania consists in Tertiary plants (relic plants), from which around 350 species are trees and
shrubs, 85% of which has a spontaneous distribution in natural conditions (endemic), and 15% of them
are introduced. Albania is considered as one of the most important migratory sites for plants in the
Balkans.

In Albania, there exist 32 endemic plants and 148 sub-endemic plants. Between them can be mentioned
Plantain species (Wulfenia baldaccii), European Forsythia (Forsythia europaea), etc. In the Red Book
of Albania 305 species of plant are listed with Threatened or Rare status. Forests and pastures have a
high value and are an important habitat for specific flora. The most important parts of the forests in this
instance are situated in the northeast and southeast parts of Albania.

The vegetation of the sites under the study are categorized on those continentals (Highland sites) with
Central European species associated with a Mediterranean climate elements, and those of Mediterranean

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

element mixed sometime with European ones in the lower zones (i.e. in Fier and Lushnje districts) and
19
intermediary ones (i.e. in Berat and Skrapar districts). The natural vegetated areas surrounding the study
sites exhibit bush vegetation, comprised by evergreen makia. In the hills, below 800masl, this
vegetation is substituted by plantations, mostly olives or fruit trees. With increasing altitude the main
vegetation changes to oak (Quercus), beech (Fagus Sylvatica), as well as hop hornbeam (Ostria
Carpinifolia) and oriental hornbeam (Carpinus Orientalis). At the altitude of 1,000masl and above
woodlands of ash (Fraxinus) and pine (Pinus) appear.

6.11 Fauna
Fauna of Albania consists mostly in European elements, mixed also with Mediterranean elements and
Balkan sub-endemics. Albania is a natural bio-corridor of fauna from the north to the south of Europe and
also in Africa and Asian continents. There are 46 species of echinoderms, 115 crustaceans and 510
molluscs, living in water bodies of seas, rivers and lakes.

In Albania 4,000 species of insects have been recorded, 313 species and sub-species of fish, where 64
species lives in rivers and lakes and 249 species lives in sea and lagoon waters. From this 4 endemic
species, can be counted. Amphibians consist of 15 species and there are 37 species of reptile. Birds
represent 323 species from which 72 species lives in the forests. 43 species have specific conservation
status and are under protection. Mammals consist of 69 species, and about 42% are European
representatives. 64 mammals are inland animals and 5 lives within sea habitats.

The fauna of the sites under the study consists mostly on the fauna with Balkan and European elements.
The areas surrounding the sites are not very rich in wildlife primarily due to the close proximity of human
settlement that has existed in the area for a long period of time. In the more remote forest areas wolves,
bears, wild cats and other mammals occur and have a protected status.

Around the reservoir sites and their surroundings many different kind of raptors, reptiles and amphibians
can be seen. The lake waters have some fish species introduced such as carp (Cyprinidae) etc. Within the
upper streams of the study areas indigenous fish species (i.e. Greyling (Salmos Thymallus)) are observed.

6.12 Threatened flora and fauna in the Project Area

The reservoir sites and I&D schemes are situated within areas which have been predominantly adapted
for agricultural production. From the surveys undertaken at the time of the site visits to the 14 reservoirs
and dam sites and the main irrigation channels no flora or fauna was identified within these project areas
that could be considered to be at risk or threatened.

Notwithstanding, below are listed some of the flora and fauna which are threatened or at risk status in the
regions of Kukes/Tropoja (Group 1 dams and I&D schemes), Kora (Group 2 dams and I&D schemes),
Berat/Skrapare, Fier and Lushnje (Group 3 dams and I&D schemes), that are listed by Albanian Red
Book of Flora and Red Book and Red List of Fauna (taken after the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature IUCN). The species mentioned below are selected by region and altitude of
their habitats, habitat characteristics such as wetlands, lakes, river valleys etc.

6.12.1 Flora and vegetation

Comfrey (Symphytum officcinale), that lives in Oak forests.
Yew (Taxus baccata), that lives in Oak forests
Balkan Maple (Acer hyrcannum), wood, in oak and beech forest
Bearberry (Arctostaphyllos uva-ursi), bush
Male fern (Dryopteris filix-mas), lives in pastures and other open areas

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Holly Oak (Querqus ile)x, wood lives in forests and bush areas.
20
Winter Savory (Satureja Montana), low plant lives in mountain areas
Mountain Tea (Sideritis Rasaeri), lives in rocky mountain areas, found also in Tomorri Mountain National
Park
Horse Mushroom (Agaricus arvensis Schaeeff), mostly within Fier Region,

Between the animals with a threatened status in the areas under the study, can be counted:
Fishes
Ray Finned Fish (Alburnoides Fanfangae), genus Alburnoides, endemic fishes, found in upper Osum
River and (Alburnoides Devolli), genus Alburnoides, endemic fishes, found in upper Devolli River

6.12.2 Amphibians and reptiles

Fire Salamander (Salamandra salamandra), in Kora and Kukes region, threatened status,
Great Crested Newt or Warty Newt (Triturus cristatus), in Korca, Kukes, Berat region, threatened.
Common Toad (Bufo bufo), in all regions, prefer wetlands and lakes, threatened
Greek March Frog (Rana balcanica now called Pelophylax kurtmuelleri ), in all regions, but prefer
wetlands and lakes, threatened

6.12.3 Birds
Pelican, (Pelecanus crispus), lives in Lushnje region, Karavasta Lagoon, internationally protected,
threatened,
Bearded Vulture (Gyapetus barbatus), in Korca region, threatened,
Rough Legged Buzzard (Buteo Lagopus), in Fier region and River Seman surroundings, threatened
Hazel Grouse (Bonassa bonasia), Kukes, threatened
Little Ringed Plover (Charadrius dubrius), Kora, threatened
In the surroundings of reservoirs, several decorative and singing birds are meet during the field works,
like warblers and finches. Between the birds with endemic status can be counted three species of
Carduelis:
European Goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis balcanica), threatened.
Eurasian Siskin (Carduelis spinus), vulnerable (migratory bird that live in Albania during winter and the
first part of the spring).
Greenfinch (Carduelis cloris), threatened

6.12.4 Mammals
Blasius Horseshoe Bat (Rinhopelus blasmii), in Korca region, threatened
Brown Bear (Ursus arctos), in eastern Central Mountain Region
Grey Wolf (Canis lupus), in eastern Central Mountain Region
European Otter (Lutra lutra), in lakes and rivers
European Polecat (Mustela plutoris), in eastern Albania
Wild Cat (Felis silvestri), In eastern mountain areas,

The Socio Economic Environment

The sites are distributed in Eastern (Kukes, Tropoja and Kora), central (Fier and Eastern of Lushnje) and
South/Central (Skrapare) part of Albania. Due to limited time, the socio-economic team focused on
exploitation of existing documentation from the following sources:

INSTAT Albania from the year 2010,

the Mott MacDonald FS,
Communes offices, as well as

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Field observation for verification and filling data gaps.

21

The social economic assessment focused on the Kukes, Kora, Fier, Berat and Lushnje regions
(prefectures) where the 14 dam and I&D schemes are located. In the following are given general data
related to regions, other data related to communes where the reservoirs are located, and data on
agriculture and land use from the reservoir sites.

6.13 Demography
Table The Socio Economic Environment-20 below provides an indication of the population structure
between rural and urban dwellers in the districts. In general there are more people living within the rural
areas than in urban centres. This can be interpreted by the importance of agriculture development and
irrigation needs in such regions.

Table The Socio Economic Environment-20: Natural demographic structure of the Districts
Gjendja ne fillim / Vdekje / Deaths Gjendja ne fund /
Lindje / Live Vdekje / Martesa /
District/Prefecture Balance at the nn 1vj. / 1-4 vje / Balance at the
births Deaths marriages
beginning under 1yrs 1-4 yrs end
Fier
Rrethi / District 267116 3172 1158 14 4 1749 269452
Bashkia / Urban 115668 1248 516 4 1 678 117074
Komunat / Rural 151448 1924 642 10 3 1071 152378
Kukes
Rrethi / District 61546 731 235 2 1 304 61851
Bashkia / Urban 21584 257 91 0 1 128 23161
Komunat Rural 39962 474 144 2 0 176 38690
Lushnje
Rrethi / District 178875 1350 828 7 2 1079 179812
Bashkia / Urban 68309 490 330 4 0 370 68414
Komunat Rural 110566 860 498 3 2 709 111398
Berat
Rrethi / District 154944 1295 686 3 2 877 156254
Bashkia / Urban 71950 486 305 0 0 342 72473
Komunat Rural 82994 809 381 3 2 535 83781
Kora
Rrethi / District 201304 1689 1156 4 3 981 201483
Bashkia / Urban 92690 398 603 0 0 333 92801
Komunat Rural 108614 1291 553 4 3 648 108682

6.13.1 Migration
Overall migration has been one of the main demographic problems in all regions changing considerably
the population ratios and structure. During the years 1990-2000, an important part of labour force
migrated outside of Albania. Migrants from Kukes went mainly to the UK; those from Kora went to
Greece, Germany, Italy and US. In the other areas (e.g. Berat, Fier and Lushnje regions) people have
migrated mostly to Italy and Germany, and lesser amount to Greece. Once the migrants found
employment in these countries and became officially registered in these Western countries, they took their
families with them.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Late in 2000, these large movements of population have ceased. In 2010, when Albania attained the right
22
for free movement within EU countries, the migration phenomenon stopped. In the last two years due to
the global economic crisis, migrants are now returning home and investing in their home country (See
Table The Socio Economic Environment-21). The economic crisis in Greece in particular has caused a
major migration of Albanians from Greece to their home towns and villages. These people are considered
a very important future labour force, but it is important that they obtain employment; hence development
of the rural areas is very important.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-21: Migration within the Districts
T ardhur / Migration IN Larguar / Migration OUT
Shtesa
Jasht Absolute /
District/Prefecture Brenda Jasht rrethit /
Gjithesej / Brenda rrethit / Rrethit / Gjithsej Absolute
Rrethit / Within Outside the
Total Within the district Outside the / Total Total
the district district
district
Fier
Rrethi / District 4290 2266 2124 4068 2064 2004 222
Bashkia / Urban 2618 1403 1215 1944 869 1075 674
Komuna / Rural 1772 863 909 2124 1195 929 -352
Kukes
Rrethi / District 809 809 0 365 0 365 444
Bashkia / Urban 273 273 0 115 0 115 158
Komuna / Rural 536 536 0 250 0 250 286
Lushnje
Rrethi / District 3342 1668 1374 2922 1069 1853 420
Bashkia / Urban 1145 730 415 1200 457 743 -55
Komuna / Rural 2197 938 1259 1722 612 1110 475
Berat
Rrethi / District 3097 0 0 1787 0 0 1310
Bashkia / Urban 1093 0 0 571 0 0 522
Komuna / Rural 2004 0 0 1216 0 0 788
Kora
Rrethi / District 2175 2538 -363
Bashkia / Urban 985 603 382
Komuna / Rural 1199 1869 -670

6.13.2 Population, economics and families

The family is the foundation of the social structure in the study regions. In general there is a family head,
which is considered an adult male, who provides the greater part of incomes. A family unit is often
considered the husband, wife and children, but in some cases also the grandmother and grandfather. The
following Table The Socio Economic Environment-22 provides details of the numbers of families, family
ratio and structure, which appears to be quite normal for all regions. The most populated district is that of
Fier, and then Lushnje, Berat, Kora etc.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-22: Population and Families within the Districts
Nga e cila:Femra / Nga e cila Meshkuj Numri I / Familjeve/
FIER DISTRICT Gjithsej / Total
from which Female / from which Male Number of Families
Gjithsej rrethi / District total 269452 131573 137879 69878
-Bashkia / Urban 127518 62908 64610 36362
Komun / Rural 141934 68665 73269 33516
Nga e cila:Femra / Nga e cila Meshkuj Numri I / Familjeve/
KUKES DISTRICT Gjithsej / Total
from which Female / from which Male Number of Families
Gjithsej rrethi / District total 61851 31609 30242 13371
-Bashkia / Urban 23161 11535 11626 4547
Komun / Rural 38690 20074 18616 8824
Nga e cila:Femra / Nga e cila Meshkuj Numri I / Familjeve/
LUSHNJE DISTRICT Gjithsej / Total
from which Female / from which Male Number of Families
Gjithsej rrethi / District total 179812 92113 87699 46363

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

-Bashkia / Urban 68414 34699 33715 18617

Komun / Rural
23
111398 57414 53984 27746
Nga e cila:Femra / Nga e cila Meshkuj Numri I / Familjeve/
BERAT DISTRICT Gjithsej / Total
from which Female / from which Male Number of Families
Gjithsej rrethi / District total 156254 78849 77405 40244
-Bashkia / Urban 72473 35862 36611 18715
Komun / Rural 83781 42987 40794 21529
Nga e cila:Femra / Nga e cila Meshkuj Numri I / Familjeve/
KORCA DISTRICT Gjithsej / Total
from which Female / from which Male Number of Families
Gjithsej rrethi / District total 143271 71379 71892 62793
-Bashkia / Urban 59825 30503 29322 333
Komun / Rural 83446 40876 42570 648

6.13.3 Farm Sizes

The majority of farms in Albania are family farms with the average size in hectares reported to be
1.2ha/farm. The following Table The Socio Economic Environment-23 presents this data by scheme
indicating number of families and dependent population:
Table The Socio Economic Environment- 23: Average Farm Size and numbers of families within the schemes

Average Farm Size

Average Farm Size Total
reported by Number of Number of
Scheme reported by Dependent
MAFCP for region Farms Families
commune (Hectare) Population
(Hectare)
TPlan 1 0.62 600 735 2567
Vranisht 2 1.2 0.62 180 262 1050
Tregtan2 1.1 0.62 275 340 1370
Tregtan3 1.1 0.62 165 220 825
Murriz Thane 1.8 1.64 23226 Nd Nd
Kurjan and Strum 1.5 1.64 8373 10299 51715
Zharrez 1.4 1.64 1678 1942 8606
Slanica 1.4 1.37 2550 2900 12750
Belesova 1.2 1.37 1470 1850 6900
Duhanas 1.2 1.37 1080 1260 3960
Staravecke 0.5 1.37 300 322 1465
Leminot 0.7 1.45 1141 1624 6060
Koshnica 1 0.62 1.45 912 912 3280
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

6.14 Unemployment and employment

6.14.1 Unemployment
Unemployment is quite a big problem in Albania as it is in many parts of Europe. The official number of
unemployed is large (~35%)16, but it should be mentioned that an important part of the labour force is
working in the black economy (underground economy) for example working in part time employment or
in unregistered entities, hence people are taking their salaries but are not registered at offices. The part of
labour force in general is not insured at health and civil offices, and this reduces their possibility to be
treated in public health institutions, without additional expenditures. Such a situation reduces and risks
seriously the financial incomes of their families. Most of the population are employed in private
enterprises. In cities and towns a part of the labour force is employed at state offices. A much smaller part
of commune population is employed in state local offices and this number is insignificant.

16
Source is CIA World Fact book

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

The population of rural areas, in general is self-employed in their own farms. These families are
24
dependent upon agricultural production and marketing their produce. In general, also these farmer
families are not insured for health and social purposes. Only in rare cases some of the village peoples are
working in state offices, like the police force, post office, communal services etc. All people employed
within the state services are covered for health and social insurance. The following Table The Socio
Economic Environment-24 provides indications of unemployment in the districts; this is made up of three
sources:

Unemployed that are processed and receive benefit and social assistance (treated),
Those unemployed for the first time on the labour market, and
Other unemployed.

The unemployment trends are quite typical; with more women than men out of work. A larger proportion
of over 35 are out of work and far more people that received little education are out of work. More details
on unemployment are contained in Annex E.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-24: Unemployment within the Districts
By Age By Education Level
family
Total Overall Total Kinder
District Female head 15- 20- 25- Over High Professional
Population Unemployed 8 University
(Male) 19 24 34 35 School school
years
Fier 269452 9794 6306 2857 418 889 2063 6424 4771 2507 2332 184
Kukes 61851 4937 2318 2087 432 403 1703 2399 2258 1635 971 73
Lushnje 179812 6596 3311 2547 459 934 2269 2934 3486 1710 1143 257
Berat 156254 3253 1448 1578 87 238 510 2418 1867 446 855 85
Kora 143271 4923 2712 1847 121 493 849 3512 3178 1007 519 219

6.14.2 Employment
Data on the number of people in employment is quite difficult to obtain because of the factor of the
underground economy mentioned earlier. Details of those employed in the state sector for 2010 are
available. This is contained in Table The Socio Economic Environment-25 below. Much more details on
employment are contained in Annex E.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-25: Unemployment within the Districts
Average No or people
District Total Female Total Male
employed in 2010
Fier 9585 3745 5840
Kukes 3163 2006 1157
Lushnje 3449 1872 1577
Berat 4372 2425 1947
Kora 5771 No data No data
TOTAL 26340 10048 10521

6.15 Ethnicity, Religion, Education, Health and Currency

6.15.1 Ethnicity and religion

The ethnicity of all areas is quite similar. The basic ethnicity in all regions under the study is Albanian,
and also the nationality. The language used as well as the official language is Albanian. There are three
religions; Islamic, Orthodox and Catholic which follow a similar pattern to the rest of Albania.

In the areas under the study the main religion is Islamic, and in some areas (e.g. Kora) also Orthodox
due to the proximity to Greece. The different religion groups, all of them with Albanian ethnicity,

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

generally get on well together. This compatibility of the religions has implied that there are many inter-
25
marriages between different faiths. In all religion groups, including Islamic faiths there are no cases of
fanaticism.

6.15.2 Education
The education system in Albania is broken down into the following categories:

preliminary elementary school,

elementary school,
medium school,
Universities and
post University

Albanian is the main language used in all schools. The schools are private or state run institutions. In the
towns of Kora and Fier there are privately operating universities. In Kora, there is also a state run
university.

6.15.3 Health
The health services are based on poly-clinics and hospitals. In general the centres for urgent health
services are located within the commune centres. The health service is also state and privately based.
State institutions generally treat those with health insurance (i.e. state employees and families) while
other members of the population must pay for treatment. Health insurance in the private facilities does not
function well and can only be accessed by those that can afford it.

The following Table The Socio Economic Environment-26 provides details of the number of health
institutions within the district.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-26: Health Facilities within the Districts
District Fier Kukes Lushnje Berat Kora
Total Number of Health Facilities in District 291 25 300 291 330
In Urban Areas 33 11 20 33 23
In Rural Areas 258 14 280 258 317
Ambulances urban No data 8 12 14 0
Ambulances rural No data 0 65 110 85

More details on health facilities are contained in Annex E.

6.15.4 Currency
The money used in all Albanian territories is the Albanian LEK (ALL). The current currency range with
the United States Dollar is 1 USD = 105 LEK.

6.16 Land Tenure and Land Use

The land tenure is divided into state lands and private lands. In the agricultural areas, the private land is
generally inherited. Nevertheless under Albanian law, most of the owners of the period before World War
II are considered legal owners only for a part of their inherited land. The other lands, or occupied
agricultural lands are distributed to the farmers.
Between the years 1990-2000, much state or private lands were occupied by illegal developers or families
that had no legal claim of hereditary entitlement. Many laws were adapted to regulate this situation and to

CEIA
 Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

avoid social conflicts. This process until now is not proceeding satisfactorily and hence land ownership is
26
quite a complicated issue, especially in the cities. In the rural areas, this situation appears better, as most
of the owners have a hereditary claim to their land.

Land use, is quite relative to land tenure. The land use of the state or private lands can be decided by the
land owners (i.e. State or Private), but only after approval of the intended use from the state authorities.
Most of the agriculture lands are used by private farmers. Also a part of forests is privatized, or provided
for use to the village community. Notwithstanding, the specific sites, like protected areas, reservoirs,
rivers etc are all state owned, but can be offered or used with a concession to private developers. Details
of land use within the districts are shown in Table The Socio Economic Environment-27.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-27: Land Use within the Districts
Njsia e
Matjes / Fier Kukes Lushnje Berat Korce
Nr Emrtimi / Name
Unit
Siprfaqe gjithsej /
1 ha 79406 66480.6 71239 93888 137369
Total area
Nga: - Siprfaqe bujqsore /
a ha 52591.8 11415.6 51109 35324
From which: agriculture area
Siprfaqe bujqsore e prdorur /
2 ha 46232.3 51109 28746 52390
Agriculture area in use
Nga: - Bimt e arave /
ha 38912.5 4909 45887 19493 26533
From which: - field crops
- Kulturat drufrutore /
ha 7319.8 1150.7 5222 9253 2253
-tree crops
Livadhe e kullota /
b ha 618 14505 440 8183 23604
meadows and pastures
Pyje +truall /
c ha 7100 40560 4563 29620 54900
woods + lands
Toke jo bujqesore /
d ha 6359.5 1024.6 1276 20761 30079
non-agricultural land
NR tapive te ndara / Cope /
3 3419.9 13849 19670 0
number of land patents distributed unit

6.17 Agricultural Production

This section describes the products on crops and vegetables, fruit trees, livestock etc., for the districts of
Fier, Berat, Kora and Kukes. In general the production of agricultural lands will increase over the next
few years, but there are factors which will hinder this development. The low income levels and poverty of
the rural population reduces the use of fertilizers and pesticides. This on the one hand is good for the
environment as it prevents excessive water pollution, but on the other hand, production quality and
quantity is reduced.

The malfunction or immobility of irrigation reservoirs and canals is also influencing a reduction of
agricultural products. Furthermore, problems of climatic change and malfunction of draining channels has
created problems of flooding of agricultural lands during extreme rainfall events.

The Albanian government is trying to restore all irrigation and draining system, to save farm assets and
crop production and to improve the standard of living in the communities, using the agriculture activity as
a powerful development instrument.

6.17.1 Crop Types

Within the areas of the irrigation schemes and reservoirs, the most popular crops are forages and alfalfa or
lucerne, with wheat grown in winter and spring, and maize grown in the summer. Small lands or gardens

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

are planted with vegetables. Beans and hay are grown also in Kukes district. There are a lot of fruit tree
27
plantations in Kora, Fier and Lushnje and Berat with apples, cherry, plum, pear, fig, olive trees, oranges
and vineyards. Issues on crop patterns has been included in the questionnaire and will be elaborated in the
social impact assessment.

In the low lying areas (i.e. Fier and Berat Districts), the total planted surfaces are dominated by forages
42-45%, with Lucerne more than 90% of this. Vegetables, maize, olive trees, vineyards and fruit trees are
also cultivated in these areas. The greenhouse surface area in these districts is increasing and these
predominantly grow fruit and vegetables primarily intended to supply the market all year round; resulting
in an increase in revenue for the farmers. Significant amounts for forages and alfalfa are grown for
livestock and this represents more than half of the cropped area of all the schemes (see Table The Socio
Economic Environment-28).
Table The Socio Economic Environment-28: Aggregated Structure of Cropped Area within all Schemes
Aggregated total cropped area
Crop Type Average
(hectares)
Wheat 15% 12,567
Maize 10% 4,855
Potatoes 1% 463
Beans 3% 1,419
Tobacco 0% 20
Vegetables 6% 3,893
Forages 31% 13,884
Alfalfa 22% 11,949
Fruit trees 3% 698
Apples 1% 72
Pastures 2% 139
Olive tree 3% 2,395
Vineyards 2% 739
Oranges 0% 14
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study data collected by Regional Directorate of Agricultural Food and Consumer
Protection, Irrigation Board, Communes and Consultant

6.17.2 Crop Patterns and Crop Yields

Details of the Crop Patterns within the 14 irrigation schemes being investigated are shown in Table The
Socio Economic Environment-29 below. As the I&D schemes are in poor condition, the yield of the crops
of cereals and green vegetables and green forages is around 30-50% less than what the maximum yield
could be. This has caused the farmers to increase the use of wells to supplement their water supply for
drop requirements. More details crop and fruit tree production are contained in Annex E.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-29: Current crop pattern and intensity within all Schemes
StrumKurjan and
Murriz Thana

Koshnice 1
Staravecke
Vranisht 2

Tregtan 2

Tregtan 3

Belesova

Duhanas

Leminoti
Zharrez

Slanica
TPlan

Crop Type

Wheat 0.4% 13.2% 13.5% 12.2% 26.3% 18.3% 21.2% 9.6% 11.3% 14.5% 16.7% 19.3% 21.1%
Maize 12.7% 9.9% 10.8% 15.9% 9.6% 5.2% 9.3% 6.0% 13.8% 8.7% 11.1% 9.7% 8.2%
Potatoes 0.2% 1.6% 0.0% 1.2% 0.8% 0.7% 2.0% 2.2% 0.3% 1.4% 2.2% 5.0% 1.5%
Beans 0.0% 2.6% 8.1% 1.2% 3.0% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2% 1.8% 1.2% 5.6% 2.9% 6.7%
Tobacco 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Vegetables 2.2% 4.9% 8.1% 2.4% 8.6% 2.8% 14.9% 6.0% 2.3% 4.3% 11.1% 7.7% 4.3%
Forages 49.6% 29.6% 29.7% 40.2% 23.3% 36.0% 24.3% 35.4% 34.6% 25.4% 23.3% 26.8% 26.1%

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Kurjan and Strum

Murriz Thana
28

Staravecke
Vranisht 2

Tregtan 2

Tregtan 3

Belesova

Duhanas

Leminoti
Zharrez

Slanica
TPlan
Crop Type

Koshnice 1
Alfalfa 6.2% 26.3% 21.6% 22.0% 21.0% 30.6% 21.2% 27.7% 27.7% 20.3% 16.7% 21.2% 21.1%
Fruit trees 0.8% 7.6% 5.4% 3.2% 1.2% 0.3% 0.3% 1.2% 1.3% 6.1% 3.3% 3.9% 6.1%
Apples 0.2% 2.3% 2.7% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 4.4%
Pastures 27.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Olive tree 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 3.7% 3.4% 6.7% 5.6% 14.5% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0%
Vineyards 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.5% 1.5% 0.8% 2.1% 3.9% 1.4% 3.6% 4.4% 1.9% 0.7%
Oranges 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Cropp
ing 84% 140% 132% 130% 98% 65% 37% 130% 138% 125% 113% 33% 78%
Intensity
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

All dry forage including wheat straw, alfalfa, hay, maize stover (coarse fodder) and dry grass is stored in
conical haystacks usually located near the farm houses and not adjacent to the I&D areas. Corn cobs are
often stored in roofed, wire sided stores above ground also located at farmhouse sites. As most fodder is
consumed directly from the stacks by livestock that pull the fodder from the base; forage is rarely baled
and always stored loose in stacks. Wastage occurs through this feeding process and from weathering of
the outer layer of the stack.

Silage is produced by the controlled fermentation of a crop with high moisture content. The fermentation
process is controlled either by encouraging lactic acid formation by bacteria present on the fresh herbage,
or by direct addition of a weak acidic solution or by preservatives such as sodium meta-bisulphite. The
process is not popular in many countries, because of the difficulty in handling the strong acids at the time
of ensiling (preserving). With the development of the forage harvester and the introduction of plastic
containers, handling acids has become less of a problem and in recent years interest in the addition of
acids has increased. A wide variety of crops may be preserved by ensiling. These include; grass, grass-
clover mixture, legumes, greens, cereals, kale, root tops, sugar beet pulp, potatoes and fruit residues.
Grass however, is the commonest crop to be made into silage.

6.17.3 Crop water requirements

The current crop water requirements for the various I&D schemes is shown in Table The Socio Economic
Environment-30 below.

Table The Socio Economic Environment-30: Current crop pattern and intensity within all Schemes
T'Plan Murriz Thana
Slanica,
Scheme irrigation water Vranisht 2 Kurjan &
Belesova, Staravecke Leminoti Koshnica 1
requirements m3/hectare Tregtan 2 Strum
Duhanas
Tregtan Zharrez
Grure /Wheat 1700 1700 1300 1300 1700 1600
Miser /Maize 4500 4500 5300 5300 4500 3600
Patate /Potatoes 0 3000 3400 3400 0 3100
Fasule/White beans 0 3000 3400 3400 0 4000
Duhan/Tabacco 0 3000 3400 3400 0 2100
Perime/Vegetable 5200 5200 3400 3400 5200 4000
Foragjere/Forage 3700 3700 4200 4200 3700 3000
Jonxhe/Alfalfa 5200 5200 5700 5700 5200 4000
Peme/FruitTrees 2800 1500 3300 3300 2800 2800
Molle/Apples 2800 1500 3300 3300 2800 2800
Livadhe/Pastures 500 500 500 500 500 500
Ullinj/Olive trees 0 800 2800 2800 0 0
Hardhi /Vineyards 2800 800 3300 3300 2800 2800
Agrume/Citrus 0 1500 5400 5400 0 0
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1.1.1 Pests and Crop Diseases

29
Among the diseases of agricultural plants and pests found on the farms surrounding the different project
sites are:

Potato blight - Phytophthora infestans

Tomato/pepper/cucumber blight - Phytophthora caspici
Cereal rust- Puccinia Graminis,
Grapevine mildew - Plasmopora viticola
Botrytis bunch rot grey mould - botrytis cinerea affecting fruit
Powdery mildew - Erysiphe Graminis,
Apple scab disease - Venturia Inaqualis
Blue mould - Penicillium Expansum
Fusarium Wilt affecting tomatoes
Olive scab/olive leaf spot or peacock spot - Spilocea oleagina

Pests include
Various Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies)
Plant louse and other aphids of the homopterous family Psyllidae (or Chermidae)
Wood louse or Woodlice form the suborder Oniscidea within the order Isopoda
Chafer or beetles living on many plants and crops.

For animal diseases, the pseudo - pestis avium (Poultry Plague) of chickens, Coccidiosis (Eimera sp.),
Ovine Brucellosis (brucella militensis) etc. are the most common found on farms within the project areas.

No serious human illness passed from animals such as tuberculosis, bird flu etc. have been recorded
within any of the farms in the project areas.

1.1.2 Fertiliser and Pesticide use

Albania does not use fertilisers like it used to do, which has resulted in a reduction of soil organic content
(nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium NPK) compared to 20 years ago. Wasteful and improper
cultivation and poor soil conservation practices have also caused soil degradation. Before 1990, 150-
160kg/ha of active matter (NPK) and 8 tons/ha/year of organic manure was added to fertilise arable lands.
After 1990, statistical data shows that 70-80kg/ha/year of NPK chemical fertiliser was used and only 1.6
ton/ha/year of organic manure.

The main fertilisers used are di-ammonia phosphate (DAP), nitrate and urea which are mainly sourced
locally together with crop protection chemicals (i.e. pesticides). Furthermore, fertiliser application is
haphazard; potassium fertiliser is normally required as indicated by previous soil analyses, but is not used.
Nitrogen is used on alfalfa, but this is not normally required. Generally speaking applications are made in
a random fashion without any up to date knowledge of individual field fertility status.

Similarly, a considerable range of crop protection chemicals (pesticides) are observed to be available
(refer to Annex A2 of this ESFD) but again application appears to be made haphazardly; with the exact
nature, target crops and methodology of usage not known. 17
17
Historically during the central economy period, Albania used to manufacture pesticides. For example, the chemical
plant in Durrs produced sodium tri-chromate, lindane and thiram pesticides up until 1990 when it closed down. However
it left behind a very large quantity of waste containing chromium and the adjacent land was contaminated by pesticides
which in turn contaminated groundwater. This site was identified as a hotspot and has been cleaned up under an EU
project. It is also estimated that more than 1,000 tons of obsolete (expired) pesticides have been accumulated in the
agricultural sector lying around unprotected in the many small farms in environmentally unsatisfactory conditions and

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

30
The main source of data for obtaining the fertiliser and pesticide application rates is the Statistical
Yearbook from 2011 published by MAFCP (Vjetari 2011). The statistical information given for the
amount (in kg) of Chemical Fertilisers and Pesticides used per farm, in regions of Kukes, Fier, Berat and
Kora is shown in Table The Socio Economic Environment-31 below.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-31: Average amounts of Chemical Fertiliser and Pesticide Use by District
(kv/farm)
Normal amount of Chemical Fertilisers used (kv/farm)
Pesticides used
Region District Ammonium
UREA DAP Other kv/farm
Nitrate
Tropoja
KUKES 0.04 0.08 0.04 0.06 0.008
Has
Lushnje
FIER 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.021
Fier
Berat
BERAT 0.15 0.01 0.13 0.01 0.024
Skrapar
Kora
KORCE 0.07 0.13 0.08 - 0.014
Devoll
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

By using the average amounts of fertilisers and pesticides used per district, and the number of farms in
each scheme area, the average amount used in each scheme area can be calculated as shown in Table The
Socio Economic Environment-32

Table The Socio Economic Environment-32: Chemical and Pesticide Use per I&D Scheme (kv)
Region Chemical Fertiliser Used
No of Dam and I&D Pesticides
Farms Scheme UREA Ammonium used (kv)
DAP (kv) Other (kv)
(kv) Nitrate (kv)
600 TPlan 24 48 24 36 5
180 Vranisht 2 7 14 7 11 1
275 Tregtan 2 11 22 11 17 2
165 Tregtan 3 7 13 7 10 1
23226 Murriz Thana 4,181 3,252 3,019 3,019 488
8373 Kurjan & Strum 1,507 1,172 1,088 1,088 176
1678 Zharrez 302 235 218 218 35
2550 Slanica 383 26 332 26 61
1470 Belesova 221 15 191 15 35
1080 Duhanas 162 11 140 11 26
320 Staravecke 48 3 42 3 8
1141 Leminot 80 148 91 - 16
912 Koshnica 1 64 119 73 - 13
Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

As seen in Table The Socio Economic Environment-32, there appears to be an under-use of agricultural
chemicals and pesticides. Overall use of fertilisers is well under half of what was used previously in 1990,
with soil fertility being mined in most areas. By increasing the use of fertilisers to recommended levels

pose a threat to the population and the environment in general.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

and rendering the suggested practices, incomes from farming are likely to increase and this will improve
31
the long-term sustainability of the schemes.

Furthermore, the use of fertilisers will positively affect the development of beneficial soil micro-
organisms and will enrich the soil with microelements. This will also lead to an improvement in the
quality of water carrying soil and influence the environment with CO 2 enrichment.

According to the data collected in the intensive agricultural areas of the Fier and Berat schemes; chemical
fertilisers are used on vegetables and fruit trees. The average amount of chemical fertilisers applied in
these schemes is 6 kv/ha. Nearly double that used in the Tropoja scheme, where about 3-4kv /ha is used.

Consequently, use of pesticides can be very harmful if not applied properly and they need to be managed
and monitored effectively. The environmental safeguard OP4.09 on Pest Management is triggered on
WRIP because the improvement of irrigation schemes will lead to growth of intensified agriculture which
could be associated with increased use of agrochemicals including pesticides (that are currently used at
very low levels).

The MAFCP is one of the authorities that are responsible for IPM in Albania; collaborating with
MEFWA, Ministry of Health, etc. MAFCP is responsible for policies and strategies relating to pesticides,
the National Food Agency (NFA) is responsible for monitoring and the Institute for Food Safety (IFS) and
Veterinary is responsible for analysis of Pesticides, the IFS lab, with a staff of 4 persons began operating
5 years ago and undertakes monitoring of the level of pesticides on food. The capacity of MAFCP and its
dependents (NFA and IFS) was considered appropriate. The need for Albania to become compliant with
EU candidature poses fresh challenges and these are expected to be address in a more comprehensive
IPM strategy in 2014 (See Annex A1).

The Institute for Public Health which is responsible for monitoring drinking water quality in Albania has
limited resources for monitoring for pesticides. Data has been obtained however from Lushnje and Fier
districts that shows that pesticides have not been detected in any water sources monitored in these two
districts during 2010 and 2011. In addition, the newly created NFA and IFS (through EU IPA funding)
with its established regional inspectorates and laboratories under MAFCP has responsibility among other
things for monitoring pesticides in food products (i.e. milk, fruit, vegetables etc.) but will need time for it
to become fully functional.

Notwithstanding, the current haphazard approach to pesticide use, the abandoned and expired pesticide
stocks, combined with poor knowledge of application practice implies substantial need for raising
awareness to an integrated pesticide management (IPM) approach within the I&D schemes. MAFCP
together with the associated drainage boards, WUAs and WUOs need to strengthen their internal capacity
related to pest management and the application of pesticides especially now in relation to planned EU
accession.

Besides this new PPP strategy mentioned above, GOA intends further to emulate the strategy of the
relatively new EU Framework Directive on Sustainable Pest Management which requires at its heart an
IPM approach. This needs to include training to farmers, DBs etc. in the risks and hazards and safe
practices for handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides, and also in sustainable pest management
based on an IPM approach. Training of farmers in this regard will be provided through the MAFCP.
Provisions for this training need to be described in the Site Specific ESMPs for the I&D schemes, but will
include such issues as: . IPM strategies and techniques, integrated crop management strategies and
techniques, organic farming principles, biological pest control methods, information on the general
principles and crop or sector-specific guidelines for IPM. A further outline of the training curriculum is
indicated in Chapter 11(Section 11.1).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

6.18 Livestock
32
In the Murriz Thana, Kurjan, Zharrez, Slanica, Belesova and Duhanas areas, livestock dominates, with
dairy cows accounting for around 90% of the bovine structure. At these sites the dairy yield is around
2500-3000 litre/head per year. In such areas poultry farms are also common with average yield of 1.6-2
kg/head. In Belesova and Duhanas areas the average dairy yield is 1200-1300 litre/head. The yield from
goats and sheep is around 60-65 litre/head. In the Leminot and Koshnica areas, dairy cows dominate,
followed by sheep and then goats. There are about 6000 sheep and goats with a dairy yield of around 50-
80 litre/head. The milking yield for dairy cows is 1350 liter/head lactation. In Koshnica there are about
300 pigs.

Intensive livestock farming is not practised in any of the project areas under the study; further herd or
flock sizes are small; hence the risk of nitrate contamination from faeces and animal evacuations through
runoff into rivers and then into the reservoirs is negligible.

1.2 Cultural Monuments

There are no existing cultural or archaeological sites of interest that will be affected at any of the dam,
reservoir and I&D schemes. However, relevant procedures and mitigation measures for dealing with
archaeological chance finds are included within the site specific ESMPs for the dam safety and I&D
rehabilitation projects.

6.19 Roads
The condition of the roads in rural areas is a very important issue for the residents that live there. Many of
the reservoir sites are located along very poor roads that are not maintained. The following Table The
Socio Economic Environment-33 provide indications for the travelling times from Tirana, the capital, to
the district centres and Table The Socio Economic Environment-34 provides indications of the time and
condition of the roads from the district centres to the villages/reservoir sites.
Table The Socio Economic Environment-33: Travelling time from Capital city to District centres
FROM TO ROAD DETAILS
Main/ District
Capital City Kms by road Total minutes Road type Condition
Centres
Tirana 143 121 Kukes Asphalt Excellent

Tirana 218 183 Tropoja Asphalt Good/Fair

Tirana 212 177 Bajram Curri Asphalt Good/Fair

Tirana 112 82 Fier Asphalt Excellent

Tirana 86 63 Lushnje Asphalt Excellent

Tirana 180 150 Kora Asphalt Excellent

Tirana 125 99 Berat Asphalt Good

Tirana 176 145 Skrapare Asphalt partially Good /Fair

Table The Socio Economic Environment-34: Travelling time from District centres to village/reservoir/I&D sites
FROM TO ROAD DETAILS
Main/ District Total
Kms by road Commune/ Villages/ dams Road type Condition
Centres minutes
Asphalt (only for 5
Kukes 26 46 Vranisht/reservoirs Poor
km)/dirt
Good (Poor from the
Bajram Curri 12 20 TPlan Asphalt main road to the
reservoir)
Fierza Commune 15.5 40 TPlan Bad Asphalt/dirt Fair

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

FROM TO ROAD DETAILS

Main/ District Total 33

Kms by road Commune/ Villages/ dams Road type
Centres minutes Condition
Fier 14 30 Zharrez reservoir Asphalt/dirt Fair
Asphalt(only 5
Kukes 21 50 Vranisht reservoir Very Poor
km)/dirt
Asphalt(only 5
Kukes 15.5 35 Tregtan 3 Poor/Very poor
km)/dirt
Asphalt(only 5
Kukes 15 30 Tregtan 2 Poor/Very poor
km)/dirt
Lushnje 43 43 Murriz Thana reservoir Asphalt/dirt Fair
Fier 21.7 38 Kurjan Asphalt/dirt Fair
Fier 18.5 30 Strum Asphalt/dirt Fair
Fier 12.5 15 Zharrez Asphalt/dirt Fair
Kora 23 26 Pirg (Leminot centre) Asphalt partially Fair/Appropriate
Kora 25 30 Leminot reservoir Asphalt partially Fair/Appropriate
Kora 43.4 45 Miras (Koshnica centre) Asphalt partially Fair/Appropriate
Kora 40 40 Koshnica reservoir Asphalt partially Fair/Appropriate
Berat 52.3 49 Skrapare Asphalt/dirt Fair/Poor
Skrapare 70.2 66 Kutalli (Staravecke) Asphalt/dirt Fair
Berat 19.8 20 Kutalli Asphalt/dirt Fair
Berat 8.5 10 Duhanas Asphalt/dirt Fair
Berat 23 25 Belesova Asphalt/dirt Fair

The proposed project works for the dam and I&D schemes rehabilitation have a small inclusion for road
repair at sites that are particularly bad for gaining access (e.g. Staravecke). However, the project will not
be upgrading all local roads within the communes. Nonetheless, there are some separate projects on-
going in the vicinity of the sites (i.e. the Albanian Development Fund projects) that are improving local
roads. It is therefore important that the proposed works on the dam and I&D schemes rehabilitation takes
into account these issues in the scheduling of the construction works.

1.3 Other Infrastructure

Around half of the villages associated with the dam and I&D schemes have sewer network for wastewater
while the residents of the remaining villages use septic tanks. There are no wastewater treatment plants in
use.

The water supply for the villages in the project areas come from a combination of protected natural
springs or are supplied by water utility companies within a piped network.

In the vicinity of Zharrez there are underground and surface pipelines carrying oil or other hydrocarbon
products.

All electricity is provided by a high tension electricity grid and the complete network is overhead by
means of pylons and poles.

1.4 Industry
With the exception of Zharrez, none of the dam and I&D schemes have heavy scale industry in the near
vicinity. Most industries are minor including small dairies, saw mills, flour mills, small scale commercial
fisheries, and numerous hardware shops, restaurants, bars and cafes.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The chapter identifies potential environmental impacts; however in the ESFD the impacts are considered
in principle and are screened overall, because the detailed categorization and detailed assessment is done
at the site specific level.

It should also be noted that this ESFD covers all types of potential situations and subsequent mitigation
measures outlined in the ESFD may not apply in all cases.

The environmental impacts for the restoration and rehabilitation of the 14 dams, reservoirs and I&D
schemes under the study, can be classified in positive and negative impacts. On those two main groups,
the Consultant has considered also the spatial impacts, indirect impacts, direct ones etc. After
categorization of impacts, the consultant has weighted and ranked them, selecting potential and
accumulative ones.

The impacts are considered at two main steps, at the construction and at the operation phases. To define
the overall environmental, safeguard and social negative impacts the WB model of impact checklists has
been used.

As previously mentioned, at this stage of the project, the Consultant has based his assessment mostly on
existing information sources, and specific studies related to the sites, as well as field surveys to complete
the general view of overall effects of the project implementation.

The environmental impacts chapter (section 10) refers to the overall impacts that will be the framework
for the site specific ESMPs. In this part of the study the positive and negative impacts are classified and
ranked, opening the opportunity, to evaluate the benefits by project implementation and mitigate negative
ones.

7.1 Positive Environmental Impacts

The project intends to improve the irrigation capacity in the 13 reservoirs (Strum and Kurjan dams share
the same reservoir) and related I&D schemes, during a critical economic period of the Albanian economy.
Agriculture remains the most important economic activity in Albania in general and especially within the
regions of Lushnje, Fier, Berat, Kora and Kukes, where the reservoirs and I&D schemes are located.
Such a project is urgently required to increase agricultural productivity and to improve the livelihoods of
the people living within the areas covered by the irrigation schemes.

Rehabilitation of reservoirs, followed by revitalization of irrigation channels, will ensure improvement of

agriculture production, based on vegetation and plant production that will increase the agriculture soil
stability, reduce erosion, create permanent habitats with seasonal features, that create appropriate habitats
not only for specific indigenous fauna (with protection status) but also for migratory species almost
threatened or protected in European or at global level. In the following Table ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS-35 the types of positive impacts are considered for each phase and their efficiency/effects in
time and space.
Table ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS-35: Screening of Positive Environmental Impacts
Types of Construction Operation Impact
Spatial Efficiency
Positive impacts phase phase duration
Not
Flood control Very important Saving of human life and assets Long Term
considerable
Increase the Create agricultural plant habitats in large areas
Not active Very important Long Term
intensive green cover for period of year

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Types of Construction Operation Impact

Spatial Efficiency
Positive impacts phase phase duration
Reduce erosion 1.Create agricultural plant habitats in large
2
activity by areas for period of year
Long Term
compacting the soils Not active Very important 2.Reduce water(also river) and soil pollution by
and fixing the soil reducing sediment transport and disposal
layer by plant roots 3. Protect/Save Agricultural Land
Increasing of health Positive effects to all lowland and downstream
safety by possible people where eroded sediment is transported
Impacts to human Not
contamination by waters Long term
health considerable
coming from
sediment transport
Safety of specific
Positive effects to all lowland and downstream
fauna from possible
Not positive wildlife where eroded sediment is transported
Impacts on wildlife contamination Long term
impacts by waters
during sediment
transport
Conservation of fish and wildlife in command
area and associated rivers due to
Conservation of fish
Not positive Very important establishment of habitat protection and fishery Long term
and wildlife
management mechanisms and increased
environmental awareness
Ecosystem Restoration of wetland ecosystem functions
Not positive Very important Long term
Restoration adjacent to command area (if they are present)

The table above is related only to ecological/environmental impacts. The social and economic impacts are
discussed in the next chapter. Together with the social and economic positive impacts it will be possible
to see clearly the total effects of the project implementation.

From Table ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS-35: Screening of Positive Environmental Impacts above it

can be seen that the positive effects of the reservoir and dam rehabilitation works will be most
pronounced during the operation phase when the people downstream will enjoy better flood control,
increased cropping intensities, increased crop yields and diversity, better drainage, there will be less
sediment transport and the plant habitats will be improved by a regular irrigated supply. During the
construction phase there are generally limited positive effects on the environment and health, and in
general impacts would be negative, but this would be for a short periods (most construction periods are
anticipated to be no more than 3 to 4 months.

7.2 Negative Environmental impacts

The possible negative impacts are classified and screened having taken into account horizontal and
vertical effects, the impact phase, duration of impacts, their potential etc., thus creating a better
framework for mitigation measures and the monitoring plan. The following Table ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS-36 presented the screening of negative environmental impacts providing a weighting and
impact duration.
Table ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS-36: Screening of Negative Environmental Impacts
Negative impact
Project Impact effects on the Impact
Impact sources Type of possible impact
phase weight environmental Duration
elements
Reduction of irrigation Medium Term
Limited irrigation water in
capacity during Construction High Zero or limited products Temporary
the dry season
rehabilitation works impact
Disposal of the building Noises and air pollution Construction Moderate Damage to green areas Medium Term
materials (p.M.10), risk of life by in the operational site Temporary
accidents and vegetation in the impact
Damage of surrounding back or crests of Dams.
green areas or reservoir Damage to garden of

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Negative impact Impact

Project Impact effects on the Duration
Impact sources Type of possible impact
phase weight environmental
elements
3
pumping station
waters
Increase sedimentation
in the outlet channel
Moderate to
High impact Disturbance and health
Noise, vibration by
depend on problems to workers
compacting and Medium Term
Treatment works in the equipment, and inhabitants during
treatment activities etc. Construction Temporary
working places working construction phase
Damaging or destruction impact
techniques, and Reduce green cover and
of trees and grass cover
status of the soil compaction
working space
Air pollution by noises
and particle matters, 1. Negative impact
vibration by huge transfer to other areas.
Transport of materials transport vehicles Health/visual issues Medium Term
from the source area to Increase of intensity of Construction Moderate 2. Risk of accidents Temporary
the working place transport (risk of 3. Road damage impact
accidents) 4. accidents to wildlife
Wildlife risk or wildlife disturbance

Opening of the new Destroying habitats Medium Term

Tree cutting, reducing of
road or enlarging Construction Moderate (vegetation and soils) Temporary
green areas.
existing ones and threat of wildlife impact
Destruction of river
Exploitation of raw
bodies and specific
material (gravel and Overexploitation of river
habitats, inciting
sand) in un appropriate bottom or mountain/hilly Operation High Long Term
erosion, artificial/man
source places for slopes
made erosion in river
construction purposes
bad (cumulative impact)
Accidental failure, crush
Accidents of workers or Medium Term
by car movements or
inhabitants during the Risk of life Construction Very high Temporary
mismanagement of
works impact
equipment
Risk of contamination and High/
Un-controlled
visual disturbance by Moderate Visual disturbance,
generation of solid Medium Term
remaining of work dispersion of
wastes, un cleaned Construction Temporary
materials, used water contamination/ health
toilet, missing of bath impact
dispersion, solid wastes risk
possibilities etc.
generated by workers etc.
Reduce the irrigation Construction High
Decrease the reservoir Decrease the efficiency
capacity and feeling of Medium Term
depth by sediments or of investment.
discharge Temporary
other solids generated Flood Risk
channels/spillways with impact
during works. Reduce fish numbers
sediments
Reduce water reservoir Medium Term
Decrease fishing capacity Decrease fish farm or
volume for Construction High/Medium Temporary
of reservoir incomes from fisheries
construction purposes impact
Disruption of access to
Prevented from attending
irrigation canals and Construction Medium Loss of crop production Short term
crops
drains
Increasing of Impact transfer in other
contamination risk and/or areas and affect to
Inappropriate quality of damage in lowland areas rivers, coastal waters
Operation High Long Term
irrigation waters in case of non and other areas with
appropriate quality of specific values
irrigation waters (Protected Areas etc)
Accidental Overflows Damage and risk the
Operation High Risk for floods Short term
from Dams human life and assets
Secondary salinization Fall in Crop production Operation High Leads to irreversible Long term

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Negative impact Impact

Project Impact effects on the Duration
Impact sources Type of possible impact
phase weight environmental
elements
4
decline in soil quality
of soils and soil structure

Contaminates
Contamination of the groundwater sources
Soil Salinity Operation High Long term
groundwater that may be used for
human consumption
Operation High Prevents access to sites
Erosion and Can destroy land and Medium to
and potentially affects
sedimentation prevents crop growth Long term
crop production
Water quality of Biological and ecological Medium to
Operation High Loss of biodiversity
irrigated return flows impacts Long term
Destruction of dam and Operation High
Creates devastation and Short -
Earthquakes other infrastructure
economic hardship Medium
Loss of life
High nutrient level can Can become toxic to
contaminate water aquatic life, can enter
Overuse of natural and
supplies Operation High the food chain and Long term
chemical fertilisers
become danger to
health
Runoff can lead to Can upset aquatic biota-
Overuse of pesticides contamination of natural ecosystems, can lead to
or use of banned water supplies Operation High eutrophication and Long term
substances become a danger to
health
Exposure of farm workers Can also affect non-
and farm animals to target organisms in the
Misuse of Pesticides hazardous products Operation High ecosystem (i.e. birds Long term
natural enemies of crop
pests)

As can be seen in the table above, the main negative impacts tend to occur during the construction phase.
However, during the operation phase there is potential for impact from a number of sources such as soil
salinization, contamination of groundwater and non-appropriate water quality flowing into irrigation
channels which is a potential long term concern, with cumulative characteristics. Furthermore overuse of
pesticides and fertilisers can have serious consequences for aquatic life, can lead to eutrophication and if
unchecked for long enough can enter the food chain and be a danger for health. The misuse of pesticide
can represent a direct hazard to famers/farm workers and farm animals which in turn can affect target
organisms in the ecosystem such as birds which are the natural predators for many crop pests. Hence, in
the ESFD these impacts will be considered as priority with focus on the plan for mitigation measures
including training and a monitoring program. Full provisions for the training will be described in the site
specific ESMPs for the I&D schemes.

7.3 Main environmental issues affecting irrigation

For the WRIP to be successful it is important to maintain the existing I&D systems that are to be
rehabilitated, to sustain water distribution and maintenance systems, and to establish incentives for
efficient water use. However, irrigation has a number of negative impacts that need to be addressed:

7.3.1 Low flow regimes

Where irrigation schemes are associated with perennial stream and rivers, changes to the low flow regime
may have significant negative impacts on downstream users, whether they abstract water (irrigation
schemes, drinking supplies) or use the river for transportation or hydropower. Issues to consider are:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Minimum demands from both existing and potential future users need to be clearly identified and

5
assessed in relation to current and future low flows. The quality of low flows is also important.
Return flows are likely to have significant quantities of pollutants. Low flows need to be high enough
to ensure sufficient dilution of pollutants discharged from irrigation schemes and other sources such
as industry and urban areas. A reduction in the natural river flow together with a discharge of lower
quality drainage water can have severe negative impacts on downstream users, including irrigation
schemes.
Habitats both within and alongside rivers are particularly rich, often supporting a high diversity of
species. Large changes to low flows (20%) will alter micro-habitats of which wetlands are a special
case. It is particularly important to identify any endangered species and determine the impact of any
changes on their survival. Such species are often endangered because of their restrictive ecological
requirements.

Mitigation measure
Integrating low flow release strategies into irrigation dam operation protocols or management plans is the
best mechanism for mitigating the potential negative impacts of changes to low flows.

7.3.2 Flood and sediment transport regimes

Uncontrolled floods can cause tremendous damage and flood control is therefore often an added social
and environmental benefit of reservoirs built to supply irrigation water. It is important that new or
rehabilitated irrigation infrastructure does not adversely affect the natural drainage pattern, thus causing
localized flooding. Radically altered flood regimes may have negative impacts; for example:

Any disruption to flood recession agriculture needs to be studied as it is often highly productive but
may have low visibility due to the migratory nature of the farmers practicing it. Flood waters are
important for fisheries both in rivers and particularly in estuaries. Floods trigger spawning and
migration and carry nutrients to coastal waters.
Controlled floods may result in a reduction of groundwater recharge via flood plains and a loss of
seasonal or permanent wetlands.
Changes to the river morphology may result because of changes to the sediment transport regime of
flood waters. This may be either a positive or negative impact, as dams typically interrupt the natural
sediment transport regime and can cause downstream scour for many hundreds of kilometres; and
Sediment accumulation in the reservoir can reduce the storage capacity and affect the operational life
of the reservoir.

Mitigation measure
As with low flows, the operation of dams offers excellent opportunities to mitigate the potential negative
impacts of changes to flood flows. The protection of flood plains may also be a useful measure as they
function as groundwater recharge zones and also attenuate peak discharges downstream. These are
additional positive functions of wetlands.

7.3.3 Fall or Rise of water table

Lowering the water table by provision of drainage to irrigation schemes with high water tables brings
benefits to agriculture. Lowering the groundwater table by only a few metres adversely affects existing
users of groundwater whether it is required for drinking water for humans and animals or to sustain plant
life (particularly wetlands), especially at dry times of the year. Springs are fed by groundwater and will
finally dry up if the level falls. Similarly low flows in rivers will be reduced. Any changing availability of
groundwater for drinking water supply needs to be assessed in terms of the economics of viable

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

alternatives. Poor people may be disproportionately disadvantaged. They may also be forced to use

6
sources of water that carry health risks.

A number of negative consequences of a falling water table are irreversible and difficult to compensate
for example salt water intrusion and land subsidence, and therefore groundwater abstraction needs
controlling either by licensing, other legal interventions or economic disincentives.

In the long-term, one of the most frequent problems of irrigation schemes is the rise in the local water-
table (water logging). Low irrigation efficiencies (as low as 20 to 30% in some areas) are one of the main
causes of rise of water table. Poor water distribution systems, poor main system management and archaic
in-field irrigation practices are the main reason.

Mitigation measure
Good irrigation management, closely matching irrigation demands and supply, can reduce seepage and
increase irrigation efficiency, thereby reducing groundwater recharge. The provision of drainage will
alleviate the problem locally but may create problems if the disposal water is of a poor quality. Apart from
measures to improve water management, two options to reduce seepage are to line canals in highly
permeable areas and to design the irrigation infrastructure to reduce wastage. Water logging also implies
increased health risks in many parts of the world.

7.3.4 Water quality and Agrochemical pollution

The changing hydrological regime associated with irrigation schemes may alter the capacity of the
environment to assimilate water soluble pollution. In particular, reductions in low flows result in
increased pollutant concentrations already discharged into the water course either from point sources,
such as industry, irrigation drains and urban areas, or from non-point sources, such as agrochemicals
leaking into groundwater and soil erosion. Reduced flood flows may remove beneficial flushing, and
reservoirs may cause further concentration of pollutants.

A high nutrient level is essential for productive agriculture. However, the use of both natural and chemical
fertilizers may result in an excess of nutrients which can cause problems in water bodies and to health.
Intensive use of chemical fertilizers and insecticides/pesticides for the exploitation of the available land
can lead to a proportion of the used fertilizers draining back to the surface and groundwater systems. The
use of these sources for drinking water supply is at risk due to the presence of nitrogen and phosphorus
salts. The run off of fertilizers and pesticides can also lead to eutrophication and upset aquatic biota and
ecosystems

The misuse of pesticide can also represent a direct hazard to famers/farm workers and farm animals
which in turn can affect target organisms in the ecosystem such as birds which are the natural predators
for many crop pests. The old expired stocks of pesticides lying around many of the farms in Albania need
to be secured to prevent their accidental use. Farmers need to be made aware of this fact.

Such high nutrient levels is toxic to some aquatic life and can encourage rapid rates of algae growth
which tends to decrease the oxygen level of the water and thus lead to the suffocation of fish and other
aquatic biota. Clear water enhances the effect as it enables increased photosynthesis to take place:
reservoirs and slow-moving water are therefore most at risk. Some algae produce toxins, and if de-
oxygenation is severe, eutrophic conditions occur.

Mitigation measure
Pesticides and chemicals used for agriculture must be assessed and monitored as part of the ESMP
process, and measures to ensure compliance with the OP 4.09. The Site Specific ESMPs for I&D

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

schemes need to highlight the actual measures that will be made for pesticide handling, use and

7
management.

There should be awareness raising undertaken by MAFCP into IPM but also training to farmers/WUOs
on the risks and hazards and safe practices for handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides and also
in sustainable pest management based on an IPM approach. Training and outreach to farmers in this
regard will be provided through MAFCP. The provisions for this training need to be described in the Site
Specific ESMP for I&D schemes.

7.3.5 Soil salinity

(a) Impact of soil salinity
The increased use of agro-chemicals, needed to retain productivity under intensification, can introduce
toxic elements that occur in fertilizers and pesticides. On irrigated lands salinization is the major cause of
land being lost to production and is one of the most prolific adverse environmental impacts associated
with irrigation. The accumulation of salts in soils can lead to irreversible damage to soil structure
essential for irrigation and crop production. Effects are most extreme in clay soils where the presence of
sodium can bring about soil structural collapse. This makes growing conditions very poor, makes soils
very difficult to work and prevents reclamation by leaching using standard techniques

Mitigation measure
Careful management can reduce the rate of salinity build up and minimize the effects on crops.
Management strategies include: leaching; altering irrigation methods and schedules; installing sub-surface
drainage; changing tillage techniques; adjusting crop patterns; and, incorporating soil ameliorates. All
such actions, which may be very costly, would require careful study to determine their local suitability.

(b) Impact to groundwater

Any areas within the project areas associated with WRIP with underlying groundwater potential is
significant. One of the main impacts associated with I&D projects is the potential for increases in soil
salinity. This can result in an increase in the salinity of the groundwater which is often associated with
water logging.

Mitigation measure
An appropriate and well-maintained drainage network will mitigate against such effects.

(c) Impacts from drainage

Areas with a flat topography or with water tables that have a low hydraulic gradient are at risk from
salinization as are areas with soils of a low permeability which are difficult to leach. Groundwater drains,
either through pipe (tile) drains or deep ditches, carry out the dual task of controlling the water table and
through leaching, counteracting the build up of salts in the soil profile. Normally water is applied in
excess of the crop water requirement and soluble salts are carried away in the drainage water.

Mitigation measure
Reducing salt inputs is one way of improving drain water quality. The safe disposal of salts is of prime
importance, either to the sea (using dedicated channels if river quality is threatened and the sea is close
enough) or to designated areas such as evaporation ponds where the negative impacts can be contained.

7.3.6 Erosion and sedimentation

Upstream erosion may result in the delivery of fertile sediments to delta areas. However, this gain is a
measure of the loss of fertility of upstream eroded lands. A major negative impact of erosion and the
associated transport of soil particles is the sedimentation of reservoirs and abstraction points downstream,

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

such as irrigation intakes and pumping stations. De-silting intakes and irrigation canals is often the major

8
annual maintenance cost on irrigation schemes. The increased sediment load is likely to change the river
morphology which, together with the increased turbidity, will affect the downstream ecology

Soil erosion rates are greatest when vegetative cover is reduced and can be 10 to 100 times higher under
agriculture compared with other land uses. However, there are a wide range of management and design
techniques available to minimize and control erosion. For erosion to take place, soil particles need to be
first dislodged and then transported by either wind or water.

Mitigation measures
Both actions can be prevented by erosion control techniques which disperse erosive energy and avoid
concentrating it. For example, providing good vegetative cover will disperse the energy of rain drops and
contour drainage will slow down surface runoff.

(a) Local erosion

The method of irrigation profoundly affects the vulnerability of the land to erosion. Because irrigated land
is wetter, it is less able to absorb rainfall and runoff will therefore be higher. The prevalence of
mountainous and undulating landscapes, coupled with the expansion of arable farming on steep areas and
the logging of forested areas have aggravated the soil erosion problem in Albania. Soil erosion is a serious
problem particularly in the WRIP project areas threatening the agricultural sector and causing increased
sedimentation of reservoirs and lakes.

Field size, stream size (drop size), slope and field layout are all difficult to change and all significantly
affect erosion rates. Careful design can avoid the occurrence of erosion problems. Agricultural practices
affect soil structure and therefore the soil's erosivity, or the ease with which particles are dislodged. In
general land-forming for irrigation, such as land-levelling and the construction of field bunds, tends to
reduce erosion.

Archaic in-field water management practices involving poor cut and fill operations through watercourse
embankments can result in serious local erosion at the head end of the irrigated field and in sedimentation
at the mid or tail-end locations of the field. The micro-topography of a field will thus be disturbed.
Unavoidably, this effect creates disproportionate water distribution over the irrigated field. In addition it
might create disputes between water users. Improved water management practices related to surface
irrigation methods (e.g. by using gates, siphons, check dams) can reduce such hazards.

Mitigation measures
Irrigation infrastructure needs to be designed to ensure that localized erosion, eg gully formation, does not
occur. Construction activities generally expose soil to erosion. Following the completion of construction
work, vegetation should be established around structures so that bare soil is not exposed to erosive forces.

(b) River morphology

Reductions in low flows and flood flows may significantly alter the river morphology, reducing the
capacity to transport sediment and thereby causing a build up of sediments in slower moving reaches and
possibly a shrinking of the main channel. Increasing flows will have the reverse effect. Where the
sediment balance changes over a short distance, perhaps due to a reservoir or the flushing of a sediment
control structure, major changes to the local river morphology are likely to occur. The release of clear
water from reservoirs may result in scour and a general lowering of the bed level immediately
downstream of the dam, the reverse of the effect that might be expected with a general reduction in flows.
Changes to the river morphology may effect downstream users, in particular abstraction for industry and
irrigation. The river ecology may also be adversely affected.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Mitigation measures

9
Changes to the sediment transport regime caused by dams or check dams are very difficult to mitigate.
One possible technique is to periodically flush the reservoir by opening a bottom gate (this gate must be
installed during construction such that its invert is close too the original invert of the stream channel, e.g.,
the lowest point of the channel) and allowing the accumulated sediment to wash out. This is best done on
a regular basis and with flows sufficient to distribute the sediment fairly evenly downstream. If done
irregularly, the released sediment can choke the channel, reducing channel capacity and causing localized
flooding.

The most important mitigation measure is to determine a minimum flow (often termed an environmental
flow or ecological flow), and assure that this minimum flow is maintained, especially during seasonal
low flow periods. There are a number of methods for determining the minimum ecological flow, and this
needs to be agreed with the MEFWA together with the EPA and the River Basin Councils. RBMPs are
being prepared for Seman and Drin basins and will need to contain details of the minimum environmental
flow in line with the EU water framework directive (EU WFD refers to minimum environmental flows).
Flushing the sediment and maintaining a functional minimum flow will in combination mitigate the
adverse impacts to the sediment transport, hydrologic and hydraulic regimes of the affected river or
stream. The RBMP will also provide the framework for addressing issues on hydropower and irrigation
and design allocation.

(c) Channel structures

The susceptibility of channel structures to damage is strongly related to changes in channel morphology
and changes in sediment regime. Increased suspended sediment will cause problems at intake structures in
the form of siltation as well as pump and filtration operation. Abstraction structures may become clogged
with sediment or left some distance from the water. Degradation of the river bed is likely to threaten the
structural integrity of hydraulic structures (intakes, headworks, flood protection etc.) and bridges.

Mitigation measures
The best mitigation measure is to maintain the rivers pre-existing hydrologic, hydraulic and sediment
transport regimes as described above.

(d) Sedimentation
Irrigation schemes can fail if the sediment load of the water supply is higher than the capacity of the
irrigation canals to transport sediment. Sediment excluders/extractors at the headworks can mitigate this
effect to some extent. Sedimentation is a disturbing problem for all the reservoirs that are being
considered under the first year of WRIP.

Sedimentation from within the I&D scheme itself can also be a problem, for example, wind-blown soil
filling canals. Canal de-silting is an extremely costly element of irrigation maintenance and design
measures should minimize sediment entry. Reservoir siltation shortens the active life of the reservoir and
must be given careful consideration at the design stage. The increases in erosion due to the economic
activity prompted by the reservoir and its access roads needs to be taken into account. Upstream erosion
prevention, particularly within the reservoir catchment is an important consideration.. However, this may
not be sufficient to significantly reduce reservoir sedimentation, especially in view of the time delay
between soil conservation activities and a reduction in river sediment loads

Mitigation
Soil erosion measures on a watershed wide basis are the recommended best management practice. This
should include basic agricultural techniques including contour farming, and planting of winter crops.
Additional methods include maintaining grassed swales in areas where runoff concentrates, maintaining

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

brush or forest buffers along all stream courses of all types (e.g., channels or swales with ephemeral,

10
intermittent or perennial flow).

Special attention should be given to preventing rill/gully formation as this is a major slope process that
produces significant sediment. If rills of gullies are present, then measures to combat or eradicate them
should be implemented.

7.3.7 Biological and ecological impacts

The main impacts associated with I&D projects are a consequence of the change of land use and water
use in the project area but effects on the land around the project and on aquatic ecosystems that share the
catchment are also likely. The overall habitat as well as individual groups (mammals, birds, fish, reptiles,
insects etc.) and species need to be considered. Rare and endangered species are often highly adapted to
habitats with very narrow ranges of environmental gradients. Such habitats may not be of obvious
economic value to man, e.g. arid areas, and therefore current knowledge of the biota may be poor and a
special study may be required.

The consumption of water for irrigated agriculture and the reduced quality of return flows is likely to
adversely impact on downstream ecosystems. Reduced flows, increased salt concentrations, lower oxygen
levels, higher water temperatures and increased pollution and silt loads all tend to favour vigorous,
tolerant species (aquatic weeds). The demands of different ecotypes will change through the year both in
quantity and quality.

Mitigation measures
The nature of irrigation, i.e. providing water to water-short land, will radically change both the
agricultural and natural ecology in the project area. The creation of compensation areas or habitat
enhancement within and/or outside the irrigation command area may be useful mitigation measures where
the natural habitat change is assessed as detrimental. The creation of reservoirs and channels provides the
possibility of enhanced aquatic habitats. In particular, reservoirs and channels offer the opportunity of fish
farming with native species and other forms of aquaculture and favourable habitats for water fowl, both
permanent and migrating, but may also offer favourable habitats for disease transmitting insects and
snails. Bird sanctuaries and wildlife parks can also be created around reservoirs.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
8 SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS
Socio-economic impacts for the appropriate implementation of the project have been considered and these
are very important, considering that they can cause the failure or jeopardise the project, and create
financial risks for the community or the investment authority. In the ranking procedure for socio-
economic impacts, similar tables to those used for environmental impacts have been used.

8.1 Positive Socio-Economic Impacts

The positive socio-economic impacts, are focused at three levels, national, regional and local, with the
latter being the most important. In the following Table SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS-37 expected
positive socio-economic impacts are screened for the project development during the construction and
operation phases.
Table SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS-37: Screening of Positive Socio-Economic Impacts
Types of Positive Construction
Operation phase Spatial efficiency Impact duration
impacts phase
High, Long term employment and 1.Operation
Impacts to Considerable increasing of incomes by improving Long Term
Reduction of Migration of local
human Temporary crop and plant production, indirect 2-Construction-
community
incomes Employments ensuring better services and food for Short/Medium
livestock etc. Term
1. Financial guarantees
2. Reducing expenditures for 1.Long term in
Impacts to local Human and emergency measures like relocations, Positive effects to a good part operation phase
and national assets risk furniture with foods and other goods, of lowland irrigated by 2.Short term in
economy control cleaning actions etc in different sites reservoirs construction
flooded before phase
Saving of farms, products, houses etc.
Financial/ Giving positive example in the
Increase the agriculture land value of Long term in
Educational Small country and regional level as
site under irrigation operation phase
impact successful action
Increasing the opportunity for studying,
education and recreation by increasing
of incomes
1.Long term in
Temporary Improving the quality of life of women
Reduce migration pressure in operation phase
Social/cultural improvement in the command area due to multiple
the closed inhabited sites or 2.Short term in
impacts of standard community development initiatives
cities. construction
life level such as increased incomes, adult
phase
literacy, improved health, better access,
and inclusion in community decision
making
Ensure the appropriate
development of population and
facilitate labour and financial
Demographic Maintain the right ratio of local planning
Not Long term in
impact and social population structure and of gender Establish operation of
considerable operation phase
development split democratic, gender sensitive
and transparent water
management organisation at
different levels
Small scale
Important for some sites where enough Providing an alternative income
hydropower Not active Long term
water reserves source for the surrounding area
potential
Increased Improved irrigation water
Important for all I&D sites being
cropping Not active supply will provide better crop Long term
rehabilitated
intensity growth

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Types of Positive Construction Impact duration

Operation phase Spatial efficiency
impacts phase
Yield will improve with 2
Improved crop Important for all I&D sites being Long term
Not active improved drainage, inputs and
yields rehabilitated
crop husbandry
Improvement of land capability
Improved crop Important for all I&D sites being by irrigation and drainage and
Not active Long term
diversification rehabilitated improved access to seeds and
markets
Small Will allow faster access to Long term
markets and enable increased
Better Road Important as long and maintenance is
secondary economic activities
access continued
providing more employment
opportunities

From Table SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS-37 it can be clearly seen that the overall positive impacts are
quite significant and long term during the operation phase and justify project development. Still, to ensure
an appropriate evaluation of ratio between positive imputes and negative effects, identification of the
negative social impacts remains an obligatory step.

8.2 Negative Socio-Economic Impacts

Negative socio-economic impacts are primarily focused on social, economic and cultural impacts. The
following screening Table SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS-38, considers the impact sources, impact type
and weight, effects on the social-economy and duration.
Table SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS-38: Screening of Negative Socio-Economic Impacts
Impact Negative impact effects Impact
Type of possible impact Project phase
weight on the Socio-Economy Duration
Loss of productivity
Moderate to
Accidents and health impacts Construction Cost to health services Short term
High
Worry and stress
Reduction in crop, vegetable and fruit
Reducing of reservoir capacity production.
High/ Relatively
and I&D scheme during Construction Decreasing of services for livestock
Moderate short
reconstruction works Unemployment
Financial stress
Complaints between interested parties on
Temporary at
Conflicts between reservoir reservoir use.
construction
management authorities and fish Delay to reservoir management can
High Long Term
firms, hydropower administrators jeopardise potential
Permanent at
etc. Risk on financial crises of parts in conflict.
Operation
Social issues at local and higher levels
Use the land for disposal of Conflicts between the land
Construction
construction material and for High administrator/user or owner and project Moderate Term
phase
movement of motor vehicles implementer
Enlargement of existing roads or Conflicts between the land
Construction Moderate to
opening of new roads, spillways High administrator/user or owner and project
phase long term
etc implementer
Damage of infrastructure
Construction Conflicts between community and project Moderate
(Damaging roads, electricity net High
phase implementer term
etc)
Dredging of rivers or quarrying Inciting erosion (cumulative impact) and
Construction
mountain slopes to obtain High loss of agricultural or forest/pasture lands. Long term
phase
construction material Economic stress
Create differences/ jealousy
Operation Creation of economical differences
between owners of the land Low Long Term
phase between land users/owners in the region
under irrigation and others
Operation Destruction or reduction of crop, vegetable
Poor quality of irrigation waters Very high Long Term
phase and fruit production

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Impact
Impact Negative impact effects
Type of possible impact Project phase
weight on the Socio-Economy 3
Duration
Exposure of farmers and Loss of productivity
Operation
labourers to pesticides and other High Cost to health services Long term
phase
hazardous products Worry and stress

As can be seen in the table above, the main negative impacts tend to occur during the construction phase.
Still it is important, to be underlined that some of the negative impacts during the operation phase are
quite significant and cumulative. The importance of water quality, coordination and compliance of
reservoir use and downstream use, accompanied with some amelioration of institutional framework can
ensure a good and beneficial project implementation.

It is also important to make farmers/WUOs, DIDs etc. aware of he risks and hazards and safe practices for
handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides and also in sustainable pest management based on an
IPM approach. Training in this regard will be provided through the MARD. The provisions for this
training need to be described in the Site Specific ESMP for I&D schemes.

8.3 Main socio economic issues affecting irrigation

The major purpose of irrigated agriculture is to increase agricultural production and consequently
improve the economic and social well-being of the area being developed. Although irrigation schemes
usually achieve this objective, changing land-use patterns are a common cause of problems.

In Albania the change to a market economy and unclear land ownership laws has caused social,
environmental, and economic problems. The failure to recognise people as partners in the planning and
implementation processes can seriously undermine irrigation and drainage development projects.

(a) Conflict and Jealousy

Modern water/irrigation rehabilitation schemes can become arenas of multiple conflicts and jealousy
where the following are worth noting:

there is conflict among water users over water allocation, land rights, or maintenance issues;
conflict may arise between users and the authority responsible for the project over inappropriate
design of infrastructure, water charges, or management issues;
conflict between project beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries is often inevitable. The latter often
question the justice of being excluded from the benefits of irrigation water projects. Indeed, project
beneficiaries are frequently considered enjoying special privileges that are denied other households
without any justification; and
there is conflict between donor agencies and the recipient country over design, management,
environmental impact, and financial issues.

Small plots, communal land-use rights, and conflicting traditional and legal land rights all create
difficulties when land is converted or rehabilitated to irrigated agriculture. Land tenure/ownership
patterns are almost certain to be disrupted by major rehabilitation work. Access improvements and
changes to the infrastructure are likely to require some field layout changes and a loss of some cultivated
land etc.

Mitigation measure
User participation at the planning and design stages of the rehabilitation of existing schemes can
minimize negative impacts and maximize positive ones. Consultations with and using the assistance of

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

NGOs can also greatly minimize adverse socio-economic impacts. The role of the RBC and the MARD
4
will also be important for managing water resources in an equitable way.

(b) Income generation:

The most common socio-economic problems reducing the income generating capacity of irrigation
schemes are:
the social organization of irrigation operation and maintenance (O&M):
o who will carry out the work (both operation and maintenance)?
o when will irrigation take place (rotation schedules)?
o how will fair delivery be determined (communication and measurement)?
Poor O&M contributes significantly to long-term salinity and water-logging problems and needs
to be adequately planned at the design stage.
reduced farming flexibility - Irrigation may only be viable with high-value crops thus reducing
activities such as grazing animals, operating woodlots;
insufficient external supports such as markets, agro-chemical inputs, extension and credit facilities;
increased inequity in opportunity, often as a result of changing land-use or water use patterns. For
example, owners benefit in a greater proportion than tenants or those with communal rights to land.

Mitigation measure
Improved planning, with user involvement, has the potential to reduce if not remove the above problems
for irrigation rehabilitation projects. Extension services, with training and education, also offer much
scope to improve the income and amenity of irrigation schemes.

(c) Human health:

Dams and irrigation canals can create a variety of health risks, in part because of ecological change
(standing water breeds insects such as mosquito and snail propagation etc). Irrigation canals can also
contain water with excessive pesticide residue, hence it is important to prevent people (especially
children) playing or swimming in them.

Mitigation measure
Improved signage at danger spots and public awareness campaigns within villages and within schools can
mitigate against this occurrence.

(d) Minority Groups and Women

Minority groups and women can benefit from the increased economic development of a rehabilitated
irrigation area. However, they are often disadvantaged by irrigation development if they are excluded
from the scheme because of their gender etc.

Mitigation measure
Minority groups and women in particular must have representation within the WUOs. Their participation
in the decision making process is critical in ensuring that their needs are met and that they are not
disadvantaged by the opportunities provided under the Project

(e) Compensation and resettlement

The ESIA work carried out to date indicates that the existing dams and reservoirs and the I&D schemes
predominantly lie within the footprint of the existing development and where they do encroach (for
example with the raising of TWL at four reservoirs) the land is state owned. Notwithstanding, it is
important that full details on any project affected persons (PAPs) are recognized and they are included in
necessary inventories and censuses for the RAPs to be completed. At this stage, without the final design
for I&D schemes rehabilitation, it is not possible to provide exact details.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

5
Mitigation measures
The Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) outlines the mechanism and tools for addressing the potential
scope of resettlement, land acquisition and compensation issues outlined above. The RPF is provided as a
separate deliverable under WRIP.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
9 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
It is normal practise when assessing development projects that a number of alternatives should be
considered to ensure that the project that has been selected (in this case rehabilitation of dams for
improved safety and rehabilitation of I&D schemes for improved water management and crop production)
is the most optimal solution. Project alternatives therefore need to be clearly presented (including the
zero option alternative) and this section provides these details including the delayed project option, the
alternative site relocation option and others such as considering alternative sources of water and demand
reduction through conservation and re-use and water management and monitoring.

9.1 The Zero Option

The zero option would imply that the current state of the 13 reservoirs will continue to be in such a
dilapidated and deplorable condition that it would become unsafe for the general public, particularly those
people living immediately downstream.

It will also result in poor agricultural development within the regions that the irrigation reservoirs serve.
The general public will also be denied easy access to agricultural goods and services.

Therefore the do nothing alterative will exacerbate the present situation and further degenerate poverty
that exists around the settlements located close to the reservoir locations.

The Zero Option is not acceptable on environmental and social grounds.

9.2 The Delayed Project Option

This option implies postponing the proposed irrigation dam rehabilitation activities. This is not advisable
considering the criticalness of the persistent condition of the dams and since the prevailing economics and
the political environment is favourably disposed towards the project.

The implication, therefore of delaying the project will mean that all processes that have been put in place
for the project implementation will have to be demobilised. Furthermore, because of the inflationary
trends in economy18, such a delay may result in unanticipated increases in project costs. These, and other
related problems make it unattractive to adopt the delayed project option.

The Delayed Project Option is not acceptable on social and economic grounds.

9.3 Alternative Site-Relocation Option

The WRIP involves rehabilitation of existing dams, reservoirs and I&D schemes, consequently there are
no alternative sites been proposed for the reservoirs. This has been confirmed by the Consultant working
on the Feasibility Studies for the 14 dams 19 In terms of the alternatives for the irrigation schemes, there
are no new irrigation areas planned. The existing options all utilise existing irrigated areas. The selected
irrigation options (usually between 2-3 options for each I&D scheme) has generally selected the lowest
cost option involving gravity irrigation techniques to reduce on pumping costs which are prohibitive in
Albania.

The Alternative Site Relocation Option is not relevant in this case for dam rehabilitation and for I&D
schemes is not acceptable on environmental and economic grounds.

18
Annual inflation in Albania is running at around 4% (source CIA World Fact book)
19
Meeting between COWI and Mott MacDonald 27th April 2012

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
9.4 Other Alternatives
Besides the alternatives referred to above irrigation projects need to consider alternative sources of water
and demand reduction through conservation and re-use and water management and monitoring should be
considered.

In terms of the suggesting alternative sources of water, this is not really feasible, as the reason the dams
and reservoirs were built in the first place was to provide the water for irrigation, as there were water
shortages from existing sources.

Irrigation using pumped water from groundwater supplies is more expensive and would require a
considerable amount of investment to provide the boreholes to be drilled throughout the irrigated area to
meet the demand. Furthermore, the return irrigation water may deteriorate the quality of the groundwater
to make it unsuitable for irrigation and crops. In addition this may lead to groundwater rise and
secondary salinization.

Pressurised irrigation (using pumps) is an excellent technique for managing water effectively and
efficiently but would require higher levels of investment and maintenance, have higher running costs
(more complex technology) and higher skills requirements for operation and water scheduling.

Water conservation within irrigation is an important issue and there are some radical measures that could
be used (drip irrigation), but these techniques are expensive and require a lot of care in setting up. The
technique is not well known in Albania and would require a completely new service industry to support it.
Reuse of irrigation water is also not advisable for the reasons mentioned above and this may also not suit
the crops that are grown.

Improved water management techniques and improved operation and maintenance of irrigation schemes,
together with improved training and capacity building at WUA level are water conservation and water
management issues that are factored into the existing project.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
10 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
This section provides generic guidance for the preparation of site specific ESMPs. These ESMPs for
sub-projects will include:

i. Assessment of the environmental impacts predicted at the various stages on the dam safety and
the I&D schemes rehabilitation, notably pre-construction (or design), construction, operation
(including maintenance of sites) and decommissioning (if relevant), the time they are likely to
occur, and their scale, scope and effect(s) on environmental media and humans.
ii. Determination of acceptable level of each impact, especially with respect to its occurrence, likely
duration, scale, effect(s), cost(s) (see also (iv) below), and the permitted legal levels established
by the respective national or international standards.
iii. Description of conditions and measures to be taken to mitigate those impacts that are likely to
arise at each stage, responsibility assigned for implementation, whether though improved design,
special protection measures during construction, or some other method, their likely costs,
implications for project completion, etc.
iv. The resources and methods required for monitoring during project implementation, indicators for
measuring and ensuring quality of ESMP actions (what is to be measured, when and where, by
whom and why); institutional responsibilities for each action required; and capacity building
requirements required, and the respective costs of each element.

The ESMP will comprise two separate documents:

Mitigation Plan, dealing with aspects described in (iii) above, and

Monitoring Plan dealing with aspects described in (iv) above.

In addition the work on the dams safety rehabilitation is anticipated to commence in the first year of the
project, whereas the rehabilitation work on the I&D schemes will probably take place later in the first
year and into the second year. Taking note of this, the ESIA Consultant has prepared two ESMPs; the
first for the dam safety rehabilitation and surrounding ancillary work requirements and the second for the
I&D schemes rehabilitation.

The ESMP for both parts of the rehabilitation (Dam safety and I&D schemes) is expected to finalised at
detailed design completion and should incorporate any requirements specified in the environmental
approval granted by the Regional Environmental Agency (REA). The requirement for approval by the
REA or any other respective authority should also be noted. This is anticipated to include the tender
documents when such ESMP measures are to be undertaken by the Contractor during the construction
phase or by the Contractor/Operator during the operation phase of the project which would also include
the defects liability period.

The ESFD has taken into consideration all types of situations that may apply to dam and I&D
rehabilitation works, but the impacts and mitigation measures outlined may not necessarily be relevant for
a site specific ESMP. The Site Specific ESMPs prepared will therefore be more tailored to reflect the
actual situation and appropriate mitigation measures included as necessary.

10.1 Environmental Mitigation Plan

The mitigation measures are related to the expected impacts defined above. The mitigation measures are
focused on both environmental and social impacts, focusing on the framework and considering overall
impacts. A preliminary mitigation plan for the pre-construction, construction and operation phases for
dam safety rehabilitation is shown in Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
PLAN-39 below. The ESMP for I&D schemes rehabilitation is shown in Table ENVIRONMENTAL
AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40 below.
At the next project stage (site specific ESMP) the likely impacts will be defined in detail for each
reservoir or per groups of reservoirs with similar environmental and social characteristics and for I&D
schemes (to be rehabilitated in the second year). The costs of mitigation measures are included only in
case of overall costs like known facilities or operations etc. Much of the cost of undertaking mitigation
measures during the construction stage needs to be assigned to the Contractor and it is important that the
mitigation measures mentioned in the ESMiP for both dam safety and I&D schemes rehabilitation are
included in the detailed design and in the tender documents to ensure that they are covered.

1.5 Measures to Improve ESMP

Strengthening of the institutional framework can help for facilitation of the implementation of the ESMP
in the framework of revitalization of the irrigation system.
1.5.1 Decentralisation of responsibility
This section provides suggestions for improvement of institutional efficiency relating to irrigation and
drainage as well as to reducing their negative environmental effects. When considering the existing status
of water management in Albania, and its enforcement by institutions, decentralization is a way by which
responsibilities and rights for water use and management can be shared

As mentioned previously, Law no. 8518, dated 30.7.1999 "On Irrigation and Drainage" is intended to:

define the legal framework for establishment and operation of water user Organizations, federations
of water user organizations and drainage boards;
establish an institutional framework to serve a national policy for irrigation, drainage, flood
protection and erosion;
determine the rights and duties of individuals and entities that deal with irrigation, drainage and flood
protection and erosion; and
to regulate the transfer of irrigation systems to water user organizations and federations of water user
organizations.

The I&D law was adopted in 1999 and was amended in 2008. During this period rapid changes have
occurred towards decentralization of competencies of the Central Government and the reorganization of
public ownership and state properties (decentralization of ownership). From this point of view, the current
law does not reflect these changes, which could be reflected in a new law "On Irrigation and Drainage" or
by amending the existing law

The new Law On Administration of Irrigation and Drainage, the key institutions for water management
in I&D systems sets Regional Directorate of irrigation and Drainage, (under MARD) and municipalities
as responsible for water use. During this current period, the law on "Transfer of Public Property" has
been enacted and transferred to local government together with a major part of the I&D systems.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
3
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Pre-Construction Phase
TENDER AND DESIGN MEASURES
Use land of lowest value: identify sites and prepare to apply RPF
and RAP procedures;
Include land users in RAP compensation packages, and/or
establish mandatory process for user identification and
Temporary loss of land and impacts of compensation;
Contractor's MARD During tender Include in tender
inadequate physical and social Require construction contractor to appoint part-time Community
Camps process for contractor
management of camps and workforce Relations Officer & establish a formal Social Responsibility
system (tender documents);
Require full site restoration on completion of construction
(tender documents);
Consider future permanent use of contractor's facilities.
Develop mandatory procedures for negotiating rights of way for MARD
Construction temporary access as part of RAP;
Unsafe access routes and construction During tender Include in tender
access and
traffic
traffic hazards Require implementation of a comprehensive Traffic process for contractor
Management Plan during construction (tender documents).
Impact of pits and quarries: land, MARD
health, Safety Require Method Statements for pits and quarries, with details of
Construction During tender Include in tender
Hazards from use of Asbestos location, working, closure etc. (tender documents).
Materials process for contractor
Procurement from environmentally & Ban Use of Asbestos
socially responsible suppliers
Require Method Statements for spoil disposal with details of MARD
Improper disposal and treatment of During tender Include in tender
Spoil Disposal authorisation, location, placement, closure etc (tender
spoil dumps process for contractor
documents)
Waste
Improper disposal of solid and liquid Require Waste Management Plan, SOPs for vehicle washing, MARD
During tender Include in tender
Management refuelling, working in water, and Emergency Response Plan etc.
wastes; spills & inadequate clean-up process for contractor
and Pollution (tender documents).
Human Potential Health and Safety hazards: Incorporate safety and environmental requirements in contract MARD During tender Include in tender
Health and documents. process for contractor
Safety Provide information on mitigating safety and warning
measures;
Capacity building to emphasis need for safe working
environment, good supervision, etc
Careful planning and scheduling of work activities,
Include provision for driving code of conduct in tender

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
4
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
documents
Cultural MARD During tender Include in tender
Loss of archaeological heritage Include chance find procedure in tender document
Heritage process for contractor
SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS
Involve communities, MARD
Public awareness campaign,
Human Include in tender
Potential Health and Safety hazards: Fence hazardous areas. Prior to construction
Health for contractor
Correct design and safety procedures,
Correct disposal of waste,
MARD After tender but prior
Health Potential noise disturbance from Pre-Preparation of noise barriers (earthen banks and trees) to to commencement of Include in tender
(Noise) Construction works absorb noise dam rehabilitation for contractor
works
MARD Prior to
Health Potential light disturbance in specific Pre-preparation of specific screened areas by installing light commencement of dam Include in tender
(Lighting) areas of settlement barriers around construction sites, worker camps, workshops etc rehabilitation for contractor
construction.
Strict adherence to RPF and RAP prescribed activities and MARD
measures;
Use of public land areas as much as possible;
Provision for proper compensation in accordance with Solve as soon as
Disturbance of land use and possible after public
Albanian Law.
Land Use
economic activities.
Provision of new land (if necessary) in accordance with consultations and Not able to
Loss of land. granting of permission, ascertain yet
Albanian law
Loss of traditional irrigated supplies. especially before
Appropriate care and consideration provided to affected
construction.
people.
Provide for alternative or regulated irrigated supply (if
necessary)
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS MARD
Ascertain if baseline biodiversity survey within the affected MARD Prior to Covered under
area is necessary and search for data, (Note: Rehabilitation commencement of dam
Potential loss of species that may be tender for
works primarily within the footprint of the existing area of the rehabilitation
Biodiversity important through lack of baseline contractor (if
reservoir, so unlikely to be required). construction.
data. found to be
Prepare conservation plan for protected species that may be
endangered, exterminated or permanently destroyed necessary)
Climate Change Climate extremes affect project area Apply measures contained in the 2nd National Communication MARD Prior to Any measures

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
5
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
nd
on Climate Change (NCC) (found in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 of the 2
NCC including improved monitoring, plan for tree planting commencement of needed to be
wherever possible, plan for low powered on site lighting using MTE rehabilitation included in tender
renewable sources, promote stakeholder awareness. construction. document.
Determine EIA guidelines for evaluation.
Potential loss of pre- Undertaken appropriate archaeological survey within the MARD Prior to
Cultural historic/archaeological sites that may affected area to determine the initial state, however the works are CEIA commencement of Covered under
Heritage be important due to lack of baseline primarily within the footprint of the existing dam and reservoir, undertaking rehabilitation WRIP
knowledge. so it is unlikely that there will be major finds. Baseline survey construction.
Construction
SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS
Apply best practice for site management including social aspects Throughout the dam
Temporary loss of land and impacts of
Contractor's Remove all temporary facilities and restore land to original rehabilitation Include under
inadequate physical and social Contractor
Camps condition or better construction. works contract
management of camps and workforce
Hand over any contractors facilities in good condition At end of contract
Maintain strict health and safety regulations in compliance
with Albanian law and WB Health and Safety Guidelines.
Provide regular information/signage on site regarding
mitigating safety and warning measures;
Continued capacity building to emphasis need for safe
working environment, good supervision,
Careful planning and scheduling of work activities during Throughout the dam
Human Work related accidents during Include under
construction phase. Contractor rehabilitation
Health construction. works contract
Maintain regular contact with communities, construction.
Introduce strict policy for all workers to wear safety
equipment, hart hats etc
Fence all working areas.
Prevent children swimming in reservoir
Keep emergency first aid kit easily accessible at all times
Undertake correct disposal of waste water and solid waste,
Throughout the dam
Health Road accidents exacerbated by Include under
Implement and maintain effective speed control measures. Contractor rehabilitation
Road Safety construction traffic works contract
construction.
Health (Noise/ Noise and vibration disturbance Limit construction times to daylight hours. Contractor Throughout the dam Include under
Vibration) from Construction works. Fit covers to all powered mechanical equipment, generators, rehabilitation works contract,
compressors etc. construction. Cover for

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
6
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Keep public informed for on-site activities likely to cause generators
disturbance (using local media) ~Euro200/ unit
Dust in the atmosphere caused by Use dust suppression techniques (access road watering) Throughout the dam
Include under
Health (Dust) blasting, quarrying and construction throughout hours of construction Contractor rehabilitation
works contract
traffic. Prohibit burning of construction/waste materials on site construction.
Throughout the dam
Health Potential light disturbance in specific Use non intrusive lighting in operational areas as much as Include under
Contractor rehabilitation
(Lighting) areas of settlement possible. works contract
construction.
Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures.
New settlements located near to existing ones (if found
necessary)
Poor planning of resettlement Good planning of social infrastructure (roads, footpaths, foot Include under
Infrastructure Contractor Prior to construction
infrastructure (if necessary) bridges across reservoirs (if necessary), consideration given to works contract
cycling routes, water services, school, healthcare, public
administration offices, public spaces and etc.)- It is unlikely that
any infrastructure will be affected.
Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures.
Unsightly and vacated buildings in Demolish and clear all buildings designated to be in zone of
inundated zone which can cause danger inundation in accordance with the appropriate law (probably Include under
Infrastructure Contractor During construction
to recreational use as a reservoir (If unlikely) works contract
relevant) Make appropriate use of recycling materials wherever possible
(i.e. cables, pipe work etc).
Use of Raw Uncontrolled exploitation of natural Use raw materials from approved suppliers with valid licences Contractor Include under
During construction
Materials resources issued by REA MTE/REA works contract
Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures.
Throughout the dam
Public Breakdown of trust between Full transparency between stakeholders and the public on all MARD Include under
rehabilitation
Relations stakeholders and the public. activities. Contractor works contract
construction.
Appropriate training of part time Public Relation Officers
Resettlement Poor communication on the Strict adherence to RPF /RAP prescribed activities and MARD Prior to construction Training course
(if relevant) resettlement process measures. for GoA officers
Trauma and stress of local Provision of sufficient information to communities and ensuring ~USD5,000
population in the resettlement process the proactive participation of the affected population in the
Limited institutional capacity of resettlement process (if necessary).
responsible authorities Appropriate care and respect to the resettlement of affected
people (many who may be infirmed or elderly) to reduce the
traumatic experience of moving (if necessary).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
7
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Ensure the necessary institutional capacity of responsible
authorities/stakeholders involved in the
expropriation/compensation and resettlement affairs.

Include
MAFCP with Throughout the dam
Large amount of existing Maximise/ prioritise employment opportunities for local appropriate clause
Employment cooperation of rehabilitation
unemployment people in the areas of dam rehabilitation under works
the Contractor construction.
contract
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Careful placement, alignment, design of dam site ancillary
works, pipelines and structures and or timing of work (seasonal
working) especially for any rare /sensitive species
Protect sensitive locations of terrestrial and aquatic biota near
Disturbance to natural habitats construction sites. Throughout the dam Include under
Flora and Fauna especially during un-seasonal working, Contractor rehabilitation
Ensure ecological flow of river is maintained for biota works contract
changes in environmental regimes etc. downstream (if perennial river included). construction.
Select appropriate construction methods that are less harmful/
noisy.
Reduction in artificial lighting within limits of safety.
Existing trees and shrubs in area of
inundation pose a danger to
Appropriate clearance of all shrubs and trees within the zone of Throughout the dam Include under
Flora inundation, making full use of timber produced wherever Contractor rehabilitation
recreational use of reservoir. (if works contract
possible. construction.
relevant)
Develop nursery for indigenous plants so that there is a wider Throughout the dam
Loss of indigenous vegetation due to Include under
Flora variety (in terms of maturity) of planting available for affected Contractor rehabilitation
rehabilitation construction works. works contract
areas and areas designated for landscaping. construction.
Develop an Emergency Response Plan in case of earthquakes,
including most importantly an Emergency Evacuation Plan for To be determined
Potential danger of dam failure from MARD At specific time in
Geology/ population prone areas downstream in case of dam wall failure. Monitoring
earthquake or earthquake induced Specialist the dam rehabilitation
Seismic Develop infrastructure for Emergency Response Plan network ~USD
landslide. Contractor construction
implementation (warning signals, evacuation routes etc). 15,000 per site
Installation of sophisticated seismic monitoring network.
Soils Damage to soil structure due to Protect non-construction areas, avoid work in sensitive areas Contractor Throughout the dam Include under
material storage, construction traffic, during highly adverse conditions, restore damaged areas rehabilitation works contract
etc Strip topsoil as necessary and store, replace/reuse post construction.
Loss of topsoil during excavation construction
works. Design drainage +disposal facilities to ensure soil stability.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
8
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Erosion due to uncontrolled surface
run off and wastewater discharge:
Damage to land during construction, Protect non-construction areas.
landslides on embankments, hillsides Design works to minimise land affected. Throughout the dam
Include under
Land etc. Contractor rehabilitation
Impacts from excavation for disposal Design slopes to and retaining structures to minimise risks, construction.
works contract
of soil and other materials. provide appropriate drainage, soil stabilisation/vegetation cover.
Undertake careful design, maintain natural drainage where
Interruption of surface drainage possible, and provide suitable wastewater drainage,
patterns during construction, creation
Safe and sanitary disposal of any hazardous wastes.
of unsightly areas of standing water
Wash construction vehicles and machinery only in designated Throughout the dam
Water Contamination/pollution by Include under
areas where runoff will not create pollution Contractor rehabilitation
Resources construction, human and animal waste, works contract
Adequate protection from / control of livestock, agriculture, construction.
including fuel and oil spills, hazardous
casual human contact, hazardous materials fuel oil etc
waste, wastewater etc
(including suitable storage)
All oily waste to be collected separately
Control dust with water spraying, control construction
methods and plant,
Fit covers/tarpaulins to lorries
Schedule work during more socially amenable times.
Throughout the dam
Dust and fumes during construction/ Ensure all septic tanks/ latrines are hermetically sealed Include under
Air Quality Contractor rehabilitation
rehabilitation activities Control vehicle speeds in surrounding/ residential areas. works contract
construction.
Prohibit burning of construction/waste materials on site
Ensure local community is kept fully informed about the
rehabilitation construction activities and blasting routines (if
found necessary)
Time work to minimise disturbance. Include under
Noise disturbance from construction Appropriate construction methods + equipment with covers to Throughout the dam works contract
Acoustic
works and traffic (if near houses) generators Contractor rehabilitation Generator cover
Environment
Also disturbance to animal Restrict through traffic in residential areas. construction. around Euro 200/
Careful siting and/or design of long term construction plant, unit
Historical / Throughout the dam
Disturbance or degradation to known Careful siting alignment of construction/ rehabilitation works. Include under
Cultural Contractor rehabilitation
cultural sites (considered unlikely) Special measures to protect known cultural resources works contract
Sites construction.
Cultural Irretrievable loss of heavy damage to Early screening by Directorate of Cultural Heritage and IoA MTCYS Throughout the dam To be determined
Heritage / important artefacts and historical Record including photos and filming the details of the chance IoA - Academy rehabilitation can delay the

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
9
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
find
of Sciences
Chance Finds knowledge of the surrounding area Make modification to proposed works if the finds are not construction. works
Contractor
moveable
Appropriate consideration to graveyard (involving re-interment)
Cultural Inundation or disturbance of burial that may be affected by the inundation. This is considered very
To be
Heritage - places within settlements affected. unlikely as the reservoir sites are existing facilities. Prior to construction To be determined
determined
Graves (unlikely) To be undertaken in a considerate manner with full discretion
and respect to the affected families and relatives.
Include under
works contract
Waste
Mitigate and prevent against solid waste pollution during
Minimize disturbance from Solid management fee
construction phase Throughout the dam
Solid Waste disposal about Euro 70/yr
Construction workers to be properly briefed regarding garbage Contractor rehabilitation
Waste Prevent pollution to groundwater Bins for solid
disposal and protection of the environment. construction.
and animal health risk waste about Euro
Organise appropriate refuse collection and disposal regime
140 each x 14
Septic tank about
Euro 1500 each
Completion /Operation Phase
SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS
Increase potential for irrigation, flood control, water supply,
potential eco-tourism, water recreational activity (fishing,
boating, hiking), and corresponding communities enjoying an
Maximize economic benefits due to MARD At the start of To be
Economy improved standard of living.
dam function operation determined
Also important to assess the potential for improved groundwater,
surface water management (especially downstream) due to the
altered flow regimes (if relevant)
Improvement to ancillary infrastructure associated with irrigation
to enable maximum benefit to be obtained from local To be
communities and consequent improvement in the standard of determined
living of the indigenous inhabitants by the constructing new Upgrading of
Infrastructure Degradation of existing roads, improved tourism, and a road network to camps for
MARD At the start of
WSS services to
infrastructure in the area MTE operation
improved eco tourism. be linked with
upgrading recreation and sanitation facilities such as water existing GoA
supply and sewerage systems, water service networks and policy
landfills etc
Constraints Conflicts between users of reservoirs Sign an agreement with the range of operations and their rights MARD Before starting the Not additional

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
10
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
(irrigation board, hydropower between main actors, where responsibilities and rights to be
between users administrators, fishery) from the clearly defined) DID, RBC
operation direct costs
of reservoirs way/time/amount of use or save the Involve RBC and MEFWA to ensure water resources are
waters for different purposes managed in an equitable way.
To be
Social/ determined but
Recreational Sudden inundation downstream due MARD At the start of depends on the
Introduce flood warning system downstream of reservoirs
activities along to unforeseen natural flood events operation extent of
the river habitation
downstream.
Damage of Contamination of agricultural soils Interrupt irrigation in case of contamination At the start of To be
MARD
agricultural or soil degradation using un Control pollution sources operation and in dry determined by

products appropriate waters Ensure appropriate water quality for irrigation season technical team
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Low flow Integrate low flow release strategies into irrigation dam DID
To be
regimes (on Loss of biodiversity operational protocols / management plans and according to Irrigation To be determined
determined
perennial rivers) requirements of the RBMP. operator
Operate dams to suit downstream requirements and encourage
wildlife around reservoirs.
DID
Determine minimum ecological flow and ensure this is To be
Biodiversity Loss of biodiversity Irrigation To be determined
released from the reservoir at all times to ensure survival of determined
operator
downstream ecosystems (if on a perennial river) in line with
RBMP of the river basin.
Fish migration issues (i.e. prevention of
Implement methods for upstream/ downstream fish
Biodiversity some river fish species reaching At the start of To be
movement. Also undertake manual transportation of fish stock (if MTE
Flora and Fauna spawning grounds), - (if on a perennial operation determined
relevant)
river)
Control of illegal gravel extraction and limited licensing for
DID
Biodiversity gravel extraction on perennial rivers At the start of To be
Loss of some fish spawning grounds Irrigation
Flora and Fauna Control of seasonal flow and Irrigation operators water operation determined
operator
release patterns
DID,
Low Flow River flow reduction that will affect Integrate low flow release strategies into irrigation dam At the start of To be
Irrigation
Regime aquatic life (if on perennial river) operational protocols / management plans operation determined
operator
Sedimentation Sedimentation of reservoirs. Construct flood bypass tunnels/channels near impoundments to MARD At the start of To be
take flood waters (high in sediment load) away from the dam Irrigation operation determined
walls.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-39: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for Dam Safety Rehabilitation
11
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Construction of small-scale weirs/sediment traps in the upper
catchments to trap earth and sands caused by heavy rainfall and operators
subsequent removal.
Re-cultivated exposed surfaces (using native vegetation)
immediately after completion of rehabilitation work.
MARD
Encourage soil deposits from excavation/ extraction works to be At the start of To be
Soils Erosion of top soil after construction Irrigation
re-used in the vicinity of the works either for landscaping works operation determined
operators
by the Contractor or by local farmers, inhabitants, community
etc.
Take measures to avoid beach erosion (due to wave action)
MARD
Beach Erosion due to wave action around edge of reservoir by keeping reservoir level slightly At the start of To be
Soils Irrigation
along shorelines created by reservoirs below maximum or by introducing soil protection structure (e.g. operation determined
operators
gabions).
Careful siting and design of works, screening of intrusive
Localized visual impacts of items.
Aesthetics completed works Replace lost trees boundary structures, re-vegetate work areas. MARD
At the start of To be
and Some intrusions in general manmade Careful decommissioning of construction areas and disposal Irrigation
operation determined
Landscape and natural landscape from loss of of wastes. operators
trees, vegetation etc.
Improvements to dam profiles by improving design

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation 12
Topic/
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule Cost
Indicator
Pre-Construction Phase
TENDER AND DESIGN MEASURES
Use land of lowest value: identify sites and prepare to apply RAP MARD
procedures
Include land users in RAP compensation packages, and/or
establish mandatory process for user identification and
Temporary loss of land and impacts of compensation
Contractor's During tender Include in tender
inadequate physical and social Require construction contractor to appoint part-time Community
Camps process for contractor
management of camps and workforce Relations Officer & establish a formal Social Responsibility
system (tender documents)
Require full site restoration on completion of construction
(tender documents)
Consider future permanent use of contractor's facilities
Develop mandatory procedures for negotiating rights of way for MARD
Construction temporary access as part of RAP
Unsafe access routes and construction During tender Include in tender
access and
traffic
traffic hazards Require implementation of a comprehensive Traffic process for contractor
Management Plan during construction (tender documents).
Impact of pits and quarries: land, MARD
health, Safety Require Method Statements for pits and quarries, with details of
Construction During tender Include in tender
Hazards from use of Asbestos location, working, closure etc. (tender documents).
Materials process for contractor
Procurement from environmentally & Ban Use of Asbestos
socially responsible suppliers
Require Method Statements for spoil disposal with details of MARD
Improper disposal and treatment of During tender Include in tender
Spoil Disposal authorisation, location, placement, closure etc (tender
spoil dumps process for contractor
documents)
Waste
Improper disposal of solid and liquid Require Waste Management Plan, SOPs for vehicle washing, MARD
During tender Include in tender
Management refuelling, working in water, and Emergency Response Plan etc.
wastes; spills & inadequate clean-up process for contractor
and Pollution (tender documents).
Human Potential Health and Safety hazards: Incorporate safety and environmental requirements in contract MARD During tender Include in tender
Health and documents. process for contractor
Safety Provide information on mitigating safety and warning
measures;
Capacity building to emphasis need for safe working
environment, good supervision, etc.
Careful planning and scheduling of work activities,

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
13
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Include provision for driving code of conduct in tender
documents
Cultural MARD During tender Include in tender
Loss of archaeological heritage Include chance find procedure in tender document
Heritage process for contractor
SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS
Involve communities, MARD
Public awareness campaign,
Human Include in tender
Potential Health and Safety hazards: Fence hazardous areas. Prior to construction
Health for contractor
Correct design and safety procedures,
Correct disposal of waste,
MARD After tender but prior
Health Potential noise disturbance from Pre-Preparation of noise barriers (earthen banks and trees) to to commencement of Include in tender
(Noise) Construction works absorb noise I&D rehabilitation for contractor
works
MARD Prior to
Health Potential light disturbance in specific Pre-preparation of specific screened areas by installing light commencement of dam Include in tender
(Lighting) areas of settlement barriers around construction sites, worker camps, workshops etc rehabilitation for contractor
construction.
Strict adherence to RPF and RAP prescribed activities and MARD
measures
Use of public land areas as much as possible;
Disturbance of land use and Provision for proper compensation in accordance with Try and solve as
economic activities. Albanian Law. soon as possible after
Land Use Loss of housing. Provision of new land (if necessary) in accordance with public consultations Not able to
Loss of land. Albanian law and granting of ascertain yet
permission, especially
Loss of traditional irrigated supplies. Appropriate care and consideration provided to affected
before construction.
people.
Provide for alternative or regulated irrigated supply (if
necessary)
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Undertake appropriate baseline biodiversity survey within the Prior to
affected area and search for data, however the works are within MARD
Potential loss of species that may be commencement of I&D
Biodiversity important through lack of baseline
the footprint of the existing I&D scheme, so it is unlikely that CEIA scheme rehabilitation Covered under
there will be major finds. undertaking construction. WRIP
data.
Prepare conservation plan for protected species that may be Baseline survey
endangered, exterminated or permanently destroyed

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
14
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator

nd
Apply measures contained in the 2 National Communication Prior to Any measures
on Climate Change (NCC) (found in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 of the 2nd commencement of needed to be
NCC including improved monitoring, plan for tree planting MARD rehabilitation included in tender
Climate Change Climate extremes affect project area
wherever possible, plan for low powered on site lighting using MTE construction. document.
renewable sources, promote stakeholder awareness.
Determine EIA guidelines for evaluation.
Potential loss of pre- Undertaken appropriate archaeological survey within the MARD Prior to
Cultural historic/archaeological sites that may affected area to determine the initial state, however the works are CEIA commencement of I&D Covered under
Heritage be important due to lack of baseline primarily within the footprint of the existing I&D scheme, so it is undertaking scheme rehabilitation WRIP
knowledge. unlikely that there will be major finds. Baseline survey construction.
Construction
SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS
Apply best practice for site management including social aspects Throughout I&D
Temporary loss of land and impacts of
Contractor's Remove all temporary facilities and restore land to original scheme rehabilitation Include under
inadequate physical and social Contractor
Camps condition or better construction. works contract
management of camps and workforce
Hand over any contractors facilities in good condition At end of contract
Maintain strict health and safety regulations in compliance
with Albanian law and WB Health and Safety Guidelines.
Provide regular information/signage on danger spots on site
regarding mitigating safety and warning measures;
Continued capacity building to emphasis need for safe
working environment, good supervision,
Careful planning and scheduling of work activities during Throughout I&D
Human Work related accidents during Include under
construction phase. Contractor scheme rehabilitation
Health construction. works contract
Maintain regular contact with communities, construction.
Introduce strict policy for all workers to wear safety
equipment, hart hats etc
Fence all working areas and prevent children playing and
swimming in irrigation channels
Keep emergency first aid kit easily accessible at all times
Undertake correct disposal of waste water and solid waste,
Throughout I&D
Health Road accidents exacerbated by Include under
Implement and maintain effective speed control measures. Contractor scheme rehabilitation
Road Safety construction traffic works contract
construction.
Health (Noise/ Noise and vibration disturbance Limit construction times to daylight hours. Contractor Throughout I&D Include under
Vibration) from Construction works. Fit covers to all powered mechanical equipment, generators, scheme rehabilitation works contract,

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
15
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
compressors etc. Cover for
Keep public informed for on-site activities likely to cause construction. generators
disturbance (using local media) ~Euro200/ unit
Dust in the atmosphere caused by Use dust suppression techniques (access road watering) Throughout I&D
Include under
Health (Dust) blasting, quarrying and construction throughout hours of construction Contractor scheme rehabilitation
works contract
traffic. Prohibit burning of construction/waste materials on site construction.
Throughout I&D
Health Potential light disturbance in specific Use non intrusive lighting in operational areas as much as Include under
Contractor scheme rehabilitation
(Lighting) areas of settlement possible. works contract
construction.
Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures.
New settlements located near to existing ones (if found
necessary)
Poor planning of resettlement Good planning of social infrastructure (roads, footpaths, foot Include under
Infrastructure Contractor Prior to construction
infrastructure (if necessary) bridges across reservoirs (if necessary), consideration given to works contract
cycling routes, water services, school, healthcare, public
administration offices, public spaces and etc.)- It is unlikely that
any of this infrastructure will be affected.
Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures.
Demolish and clear all buildings designated to be in zone of
Unsightly and vacated buildings in
construction in accordance with the appropriate law (probably Include under
Infrastructure construction zone which can cause Contractor During construction
unlikely) works contract
danger (if relevant)
Make appropriate use of recycling materials wherever possible
(i.e. cables, pipe work etc).
Use of Raw Uncontrolled exploitation of natural Use raw materials from approved suppliers with valid licences Contractor Include under
During construction
Materials resources issued by REA or ME MTE/REA works contract
Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures.
Throughout I&D
Public Breakdown of trust between Full transparency between stakeholders and the public on all MARD Include under
scheme rehabilitation
Relations stakeholders and the public. activities. Contractor works contract
construction.
Appropriate training of part time Public Relation Officers
Resettlement Poor communication on the Strict adherence to RAP prescribed activities and measures. MARD Prior to construction Training course
(if relevant) resettlement process Provision of sufficient information to communities and ensuring for GoA officers
Trauma and stress of local the proactive participation of the affected population in the ~USD5,000
population in the resettlement process resettlement process (if necessary).
Limited institutional capacity of Appropriate care and respect to the resettlement of affected
responsible authorities people (many who may be infirmed or elderly) to reduce the
traumatic experience of moving (if necessary).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
16
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Ensure the necessary institutional capacity of responsible
authorities/stakeholders involved in the
expropriation/compensation and resettlement affairs.
MARD
Throughout I&D
Large amount of existing Maximise/ prioritise employment opportunities for local with Include under
Employment scheme rehabilitation
unemployment people in the areas of I&D scheme rehabilitation cooperation of works contract
construction.
the Contractor
MARD
Throughout I&D
Agricultural Disruption of crops and livestock Give farmers early warning of potential disruption with Include under
scheme rehabilitation
Disruption production by construction activities Provide for compensation to affected Farmers cooperation of works contract
construction.
the Contractor
Build all roads to all weather standard Throughout I&D
Disruption of Disruption of existing access to I&D Include under
Construct additional pedestrian and livestock crossings as Contractor scheme rehabilitation
Access areas due to construction works contract
needs become apparent construction.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Ensure flows in perennial rivers and keep irrigation channels
Throughout I&D
Barriers to fish passage clear Include under
Fish Contractor scheme rehabilitation
Fish entrainment in canal system Build all structures to comply with fish pass criteria (if on works contract
construction.
perennial river)
Develop nursery for indigenous plants so that there is a wider Throughout I&D
Loss of indigenous vegetation due to Include under
Flora variety (in terms of maturity) of planting available for affected Contractor scheme rehabilitation
rehabilitation construction works. works contract
areas and areas designated for landscaping. construction.
Throughout I&D
Keep all construction equipment and vehicles clean and wash Include under
Flora Introduction of Invasive Species Contractor scheme rehabilitation
in safe location to prevent seed dispersal works contract
construction.
Damage to soil structure due to
material storage, construction traffic, Protect non-construction areas, avoid work in sensitive areas
etc during highly adverse conditions, restore damaged areas Throughout I&D
Soils Loss of topsoil during excavation Include under
Strip topsoil as necessary and store, replace/reuse post Contractor scheme rehabilitation
works. works contract
construction construction.
Erosion due to uncontrolled surface Design drainage +disposal facilities to ensure soil stability.
run off and wastewater discharge:
Throughout I&D
Soils and Water Impact of vertisols (clay heave) on Include under
Construct all structures to resist heave Contractor scheme rehabilitation
Management structures works contract
construction.
Land Damage to land during construction, Protect non-construction areas. Contractor Throughout I&D Include under

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
17
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
landslides on embankments, hillsides Design works to minimise land affected.
etc. scheme rehabilitation
Impacts from excavation for disposal Design slopes to and retaining structures to minimise risks, construction.
works contract
of soil and other materials. provide appropriate drainage, soil stabilisation/vegetation cover.
Undertake careful design, maintain natural drainage where
Interruption of surface drainage possible, and provide suitable wastewater drainage,
patterns during construction, creation Safe and sanitary disposal of any hazardous wastes.
of unsightly areas of standing water Wash construction vehicles and machinery only in designated
Water Throughout I&D
Contamination/pollution by areas where runoff will not create pollution and set up sediment Include under
Resources and Contractor scheme rehabilitation
construction, human and animal waste, traps works contract
Water Quality construction.
including fuel and oil spills, hazardous Adequate protection from / control of livestock, agriculture,
waste, wastewater etc casual human contact, hazardous materials fuel oil etc
(including suitable storage)
All oily waste to be collected separately
Vegetate all soil surfaces exposed during construction at first
opportunity
Erosion and Erosion in Command Area due to Use material for restoration of degraded areas Towards end of Include under
Contractor
landslides clearing/excavation operations Provide slope protection through bank compaction rip rapping construction works contract
Ensure irrigation infrastructure is designed to prevent erosion
and gulley formation
Control dust with water spraying, control construction
methods and plant,
Fit covers/tarpaulins to lorries
Schedule work during more socially amenable times.
Throughout I&D
Dust and fumes during construction/ Ensure all septic tanks/ latrines are hermetically sealed Include under
Air Quality Contractor scheme rehabilitation
rehabilitation activities Control vehicle speeds in surrounding/ residential areas. works contract
construction.
Prohibit burning of construction/waste materials on site
Ensure local community is kept fully informed about the
rehabilitation construction activities and blasting routines (if
found necessary)
Time work to minimise disturbance.
Include under
Appropriate construction methods + equipment with covers to
Noise disturbance from construction Throughout I&D works contract
Acoustic generators
works and traffic (if near houses) Contractor scheme rehabilitation Generator cover
Environment Restrict through traffic in residential areas.
Also disturbance to animal construction. around Euro 200/
Careful siting and/or design of long term construction plant,
unit
Provide noise baffle barriers i.e. embankments, tree bands.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
18
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Historical / Throughout I&D
Disturbance or degradation to known Careful siting alignment of construction/ rehabilitation works. Include under
Cultural Contractor scheme rehabilitation
cultural sites (considered unlikely) Special measures to protect known cultural resources works contract
Sites construction.
Early screening by Directorate of Cultural Heritage and IoA
MTCYS
Cultural Irretrievable loss of heavy damage to Record including photos and filming the details of the chance Throughout I&D To be determined
IoA - Academy
Heritage / important artefacts and historical find scheme rehabilitation can delay the
of Sciences
Chance Finds knowledge of the surrounding area Make modification to proposed works if the finds are not construction. works
Contractor
moveable
Appropriate consideration to graveyard (involving re-interment)
Cultural that may be affected by the inundation. This is considered very
Disturbance of burial places within To be
Heritage - unlikely as I&D schemes are existing facilities. Prior to construction To be determined
settlements affected. (unlikely) determined
Graves To be undertaken in a considerate manner with full discretion
and respect to the affected families and relatives.
Include under
works contract
Mitigate and prevent against solid waste pollution during Waste
Minimize disturbance from Solid
construction phase Throughout I&D management fee
Solid Waste disposal
Construction workers to be properly briefed regarding garbage Contractor scheme rehabilitation about Euro 70/yr
Waste Prevent pollution to groundwater
disposal and protection of the environment. construction. Bins about Euro
and animal health risk
Organise appropriate refuse collection and disposal regime 140 each x 14
Septic tank about
Euro 1500 each
Completion /Operation Phase
SOCIAL ECONOMIC FACTORS
Increase potential for irrigation, flood control, water supply and MARD
corresponding communities enjoying an improved standard of
Maximize economic benefits due to living. At the start of To be
Economy
I&D scheme function Also important to assess the potential for improved groundwater, operation determined
surface water management (especially downstream) due to the
altered flow regimes (if relevant)
Infrastructure Degradation of existing Improvement to ancillary infrastructure associated with irrigation MARD At the start of To be
infrastructure in the area to enable maximum benefit to be obtained from local operation determined
communities and consequent improvement in the standard of Upgrading of
living of the indigenous inhabitants by the constructing new WSS services to
roads, improved tourism, and a road network to camps for be linked with
improved eco tourism. existing GoA
upgrading recreation and sanitation facilities such as water policy

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
19
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
supply and sewerage systems, water service networks and
landfills etc
Benefits and Inequitable distribution of benefits Train women during operation for I&D roles MARD Throughout To be
Equity Women not fairly represented Ensure women are fully represented in WUAs Municip/WUOs operation determined
Sign an agreement with the range of operations and their rights
Constraints
Conflicts between users of reservoir between main actors, where responsibilities and rights to be MARD
between users Before starting the Not additional
waters (irrigation board, hydropower clearly defined) DID, RBC
of water from operation direct costs
administrators, fishery) Involve RBC and ME to ensure water resources are managed in MTE
reservoirs
an equitable way.
To be
Social/ determined but
Recreational Sudden inundation downstream due MARD At the start of depends on the
Introduce flood warning system downstream of reservoirs
activities along to unforeseen natural flood events operation extent of
the river habitation
downstream.
Damage of Contamination of agricultural soils Interrupt irrigation in case of contamination
MARD
At the start of To be
agricultural or soil degradation using inappropriate Control pollution sources operation and in dry determined by

products waters Ensure appropriate water quality for irrigation season technical team
MAFCP
Provide training on the risks, hazards, safe practices for
Exposure of farmers and labourers to handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides. MARD Throughout To be
Human Health pesticide and other hazardous Provide training in sustainable pest management based on IPM (QTTB operation determined
substances approach training
centres)
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS
Control of illegal gravel extraction and limited licensing for
Loss of some fish spawning grounds DID
Biodiversity gravel extraction on perennial rivers To be
and other aquatic fauna/flora due to Irrigation To be determined
Flora and Fauna Integrating low flow release strategies into I&D schemes and determined
low flow regimes operator
operation protocols/management RBMP plans
Water Quality Reduction in irrigation water quality Define and enforce irrigation return water quality levels MAFCP Throughout To be
And (high salinity) (including monitoring) to ensure compliance with OP 4.09 MTE operation determined
Agrochemical Water quality problems for downstream Grow crops with higher saline tolerance. DID
pollution users. Build separate disposal channels for irrigated water. EPA
Eutrophication due to excessive Establish evaporation ponds to capture/contain pollutants IPH
fertilizer and pesticide use Raise awareness and promote IPM approach, strengthen
Danger to farm animals monitoring capacity

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
20
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Raise awareness on the risks, hazards, and safe practices for
handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides
Construction of small-scale weirs/sediment traps in the upper
catchments to trap earth and sands caused by heavy rainfall and MARD
Throughout To be
Sedimentation Sedimentation of I&D channels. subsequent removal. Irrigation
operation determined
Periodically flush I&D channels with irrigation reservoir water operators
sufficient to distribute sediments evenly downstream.
Re-cultivated exposed surfaces (using native vegetation)
immediately after completion of rehabilitation work. Contractor During defects
Under contract
Encourage soil deposits from excavation/ extraction works to be MARD liability period
Soils Erosion of top soil after construction To be
re-used in the vicinity of the works either for landscaping works Irrigation At the start of
determined
by the Contractor or by local farmers, inhabitants, community operators operation
etc.
Convert to alternative irrigation technology such as sprinkler MARD
Soils and Water Inefficient water use or drip irrigation (both more expensive than gravity) Irrigation Throughout To be
Management Inadequate drainage Prioritise drain maintenance by municipality/WUA operators operation determined
Implement water management measures upstream
Convert to alternative irrigation technology such as sprinkler
or drip irrigation (both more expensive than gravity)
Consider water fees based on volume instead of irrigated
areas. MAFCP
Groundwater rise/fall
Soils, Salinity Apply acidifying fertilisers if salinization is non sodic and Irrigation
Secondary salinization Throughout To be
and Water leach with surface water operators
Disturbance to traditional operation determined
Management Enforce adequate drain maintenance by WUA Municipality/W
groundwater supplies
Apply good irrigation water management protocols and UAs
routines
Assess the water supply needs of the poor/disadvantaged
people
MAFCP
Decline in soil fertility Research and develop cross specific fertiliser Irrigation
Soils and Water Throughout To be
Impact of vertisols (clay heave) on recommendations and provide easy access to inorganic fertilisers operators
Management operation determined
structures Inspect and maintain all structures Municipality/W
UAs
Erosion Erosion in command area and Maintain vegetation on all soil surfaces originally exposed and Irrigation Throughout To be
sedimentation from upstream re-vegetated by contractors operators operation determined
Promote use of erosion tolerant grasses (vetiver grass) Municipality/W

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-40: Environmental and Social Mitigation Plan
for I&D Scheme Rehabilitation
21
Topic/ Cost
Possible Impact Mitigation Measures Responsibility Schedule
Indicator
Ensure the main drainage channels are fully maintained
Ensure vegetation established around all new structures
UAs
Periodically flush out /dislodge sediment with irrigation
reservoirs water.
Promote organic agriculture
MARD
Target research on pest and diseases
National food
Crop losses and contamination from Raise awareness to pesticides and promote IPM approaches
Pests, diseases agency
pesticides Introduce training in risks and hazards and safe practices for Throughout To be
improper use of QTTB training
Impacts to non-target organisms (i.e. handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides and also in operation determined
pesticides centre
birds) natural predators for pests sustainable pest management based upon an IPM approach.
Institute for
Strengthen internal capacity for pest management
Public health
Improve monitoring and evaluation
Irrigation
Fish entrainment in canal system Ensure flows in rivers and keep irrigation channels clear operators Throughout To be
Fish
Impact of water pollution on fish Use separate drains for irrigation return water Municipality/W operation determined
UAs
Irrigation
Livestock Conflicts between livestock and operators Throughout To be
Establish corridors between I&D fields and pasture
Husbandry arable farmers. Municipality/W operation determined
UAs

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

22
Define the role, competencies and responsibilities of local government units ( municipalities) in I&D
management as a way to improve sector performance. This role may involve:
the transfer of right to use a substantial portion of infrastructure (small and medium reservoirs,
second and third channels of irrigation and drainage etc.) and transfer of responsibility for
operation and maintenance of net transfer of infrastructure;
Promoting the establishment of WUO, by being an integral part of their management
structures and support for strengthening and functioning of the WUO;
Fixing the irrigation service fees / drainage and collection aiming at a gradual coverage of the
costs.
Mobilizing financial resources from other units of local government itself or securing grants from the
state budget based on needs.

Improving the institutional plan of I&D management at three levels

Central Government including the MARD and Directorate of Irrigation and Drainage as senior
management level.
Municipality as the middle management level.
WUO and their unions as the lower level of administration, when these are effectively set up and
operate properly.

Define the role of Directorate of Irrigation and Drainage/municipality (as owner):

Define responsibilities for municipalities for the management of infrastructure that has passed the
ownership of the local government
Define responsibilities for municipalities for the management and maintenance of irrigation channels
of the second and third level and third channels draining.
Define responsibilities for WUO for the administration and maintenance of irrigation canals after the
third level of their creation and consolidation.
Improvement of legislation in terms of responsibilities that have the Directorates of forest
management for forests and high water channels and the Directorates of the Fisheries for the use of
lagoons and irrigation reservoirs for fishing.
Forecasting policies for stimulating and supporting the well-functioning of WUO.

10.1.1 Environmental Protection improvements to water basin use

Considering that the EIA process helps to generate useful information regarding environmental impacts,
mitigation measures, monitoring process etc., to the public and decision makers, the EIA quality should
be improved, by avoiding academic descriptions or using general and ambiguous terms that are not really
related to the real impacts. The following points could help to improve the quality of EIA:

The REAs and MTE can stipulate in the ToR in more detail for particular EIAs, the need to initiate a
full country monitoring on parameters such as air, surface waters quality, pesticide use etc. Although
this may increase the cost of the EIA, such as policy, can help to upgrade and improve documentation
regarding environmental quality and will facilitate much better future evaluation by comparison of
existing environmental status with different stages of development.
Unification and certification of more chemical laboratories, and training of the new generation of
chemists on laboratory analyses.
Increase the authority and responsibility of REA and Directorate of EIA in the MTE, to avoid low
quality EIA reports.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

23
Only consultancy entities, with at least three in-house experts, to have the right to prepare the EIA
(profound and generic category) reports, instead of individuals.
To open the relevant EIA evaluation offices in the Governmental bodies, that has the right and the
authority to implement important development actions that can affect the environment (MTE, MARD,
Municipalities etc. Training of the EIA evaluators (officials) on EIA and monitoring process.
Improve the documentation and information system regarding EIA process and reports.
Implement a realistic monitoring system, using GIS technologies that will help avoid obtaining
spurious and fictitious information.

10.2 Environmental Monitoring Plan

Monitoring and supervision arrangements should be agreed by the WB and the Borrower to: ensure
timely detection of conditions requiring remedial measures in keeping with good practice; furnish
information and the progress and results of mitigation and institutional strengthening measures; and,
assess compliance with national and Bank safeguard policies.

10.2.1 Monitoring Objectives

The aim of the monitoring is to establish appropriate criteria to verify the predicted impact of the WRIP
Project and to ensure that any unforeseen impacts are detected and the mitigation adjusted where needed
at an early stage.

The monitoring undertaken will need to keep relevant records to ensure compliance with recommended
environmental procedures. The plan will ensure that mitigating measures and impacts of the project
during construction (upgrading the dams and I&D schemes and operation and maintenance) and operation
phases are implemented. It is important that adequate funds will be provided for this purpose during the
construction and operation phases of the Project. Specific objectives of the monitoring programme are
therefore to:

Check the effectiveness of suggested mitigation measures;

Demonstrate -that the project activities (pre-construction, construction and operation) are carried out
in accordance with the prescribed mitigation measures and existing compliance regulatory
procedures; and
Provide any early warning signals whenever an impact indicator approaches a critical level.

The Impact Indicators are defined in terms of carrying capacity, threshold levels, and regulation and
enforcement standards. Implementation of the EMoP will therefore allow the relevant stakeholders to
potentially control and manage the timing, location and level of impacts and potentially provide the cause
and effect data for the empirical verification or validation of various predictive models of action/impact
relationships.

Construction Phase
The aim will be to assess the mitigation measures for noise and vibration, water and air quality issues and
public safety using visual assessment by the management and feedback from the other stakeholders.
Where pollution is suspected sampling and laboratory analysis should be conducted to determine its
nature and extent.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Phase

The monitoring plan at this phase will ensure that the negative impacts of the O&M of the dams and I&D
schemes are reduced to a minimum level as possible. This will guarantee the health and safety of
employees (particular during the construction phase) and the general public (throughout all phases).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

24
10.2.2 Monitoring Requirements
A monitoring program requires a number of components to ensure effective results. These include:

Relevant baseline data against which to monitor project results;

Verifiably, clear and objective indicators for each project and project component for which monitoring
will be conducted;
An independent/unbiased body responsible for monitoring;
A clear capacity for monitoring;
Monitoring on a regular basis with a sufficient operational budget that is able to provide meaningful
results;
An effective monitoring reporting mechanism including feedback and commitment to action on-
monitoring results and recommendations.

10.2.3 Monitoring Procedure and Plan

The EMoP will comprise a long term monitoring strategy and this will encompass clear and definitive
criteria and parameters to be monitored for each individual sub-project (dam, reservoir, ancillary works
and I&D schemes).

The EMoP will take into consideration the scope of development, environmental and social sensitivity
and the financial and technical means available. The EMoP will identify and describe the indicators to be
used, the frequency of monitoring and the standard (baseline) against which the indicators will be
measured for compliance with the ESMP.

It is proposed that monthly monitoring plans could be prepared by the appropriate stakeholders. These
plans will define the specific issues to be monitored including, the natural habitat, land use, soil/water,
and social impacts. It is proposed that regular monitoring should take place throughout the life of the
project. Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-41 and Table
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-42 provide an indication of the variables
that will be monitored, possible indicators to consider, baseline data to consider, and linkages with other
variables.

Monitoring reports (perhaps quarterly and annual reports) should be submitted to the relevant stakeholder
and to other appropriate state environmental protection agencies (EPAs/REAs). All these monitoring
components should be subject to internal audit by the relevant and responsible stakeholder. Each
monitoring programme will follow the established schedule; monitoring may be performed daily, weekly,
quarterly, semi-annually, annually, biennially, or continuously, depending upon the resource, regulatory
requirements for regulatory monitoring, and the project-specific requirements for other monitoring.
Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-41: Monitoring Variables, Linkages, Indicators
and Baseline Data to be considered
Monitoring Indicators to be Baseline Data
Linkages
Variables Considered to be Considered
Environment
Habitat Rare and endangered species Area and quality of habitat
Flora Populations of important flora Current species list and numbers
Fauna Populations of important fauna Current species list and numbers
Importance of flora and fauna
Area of wetlands and numbers; Inventory of wetlands, number and
for flood control and provision
Wetlands integrity of wetlands providing size, hydrological cycles and
of goods and services to local
goods and services downstream effects.
communities
Fishery Resource

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Monitoring Indicators to be 25
Linkages Baseline Data
Variables Considered
to be Considered
Community economic needs;
Populations Population size and off take Current population and off take
water quality and quantity
Ecosystems health; water
Species composition Species mix Current species mix
quality and quantity
Cultural Resources
Cultural and social systems and
Cultural Sites Sites remaining Inventory of sites
community needs
General community and Current social structure and important
Social Systems Community social structure
individual member satisfaction aspects of structure
Water Resource
Health, crop production, Quality of water (chemical
Groundwater quality Current chemical composition
desertification composition)
Groundwater quantity Health and irrigation Depth and yield Current depth and yield
Current chemical composition flora
Quality of water (chemical and fauna inventory (i.e. macro
Health, natural habitats, flora analysis/ indicator species of invertebrates, micro invertebrates,
Surface water quality
and fauna, irrigation water quality) micro flora)
Fertiliser Use amount of dosage and
timing of application
Yield and flow (seasonal) Current yields and flows in different
Surface water quantity Health, crop production
Number of obstruction in canals seasons
Soil Resources
Crop productivity, irrigation
and cultivation techniques, Sediment loading
Soil erosion Sediment loads
watering points, livestock Depth of siltation in canals
management
Soil quality chemicals Pesticide use Chemical analysis of soil Chemical analysis of soils
Soil analysis, crop production on
Soil quality water Soil analysis, crop production controlled plots where possible,
Irrigation drainage
logging Soil salinization Reductions in crop productivity
Fertiliser use
Air Quality
Scrub burning Crop production, forest Number of fires and areas Current level of fires and areas
(swaling20) harvesting burned burned.
Dust generation
Health, nuisance value Dust levels in the atmosphere Existing dust levels
construction activity
Noise
Noise generated by
Health, nuisance value Noise levels Existing background noise levels
construction activity
Health
Potential increase due to the Incidence of HIV/AIDS through
HIV/AIDS Existing levels of HIV/AIDS
project clinic records
Status of health regarding water borne
Water borne diseases Drainage and irrigation Health statistics/local clinics
diseases
Other Social
Economic need from Harvest results, population size,
Fishery population by species, forest
other natural resources Irrigation, drainage conflicts area under forest cover, forest
stand volumes and areas
(forestry, fishery etc.) stand condition
Current conflict levels, and number
Conflicts Land and water resource use Number and nature of conflicts
observed from WRIP

Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-42: Cumulative Impacts -Monitoring Indicators
and Possible External Factors
Impact Indicators Contributing External Activities
Total area and number of important Urbanisation, road development, agricultural
Loss of Habitats
habitats development other capital project development
Loss of Wetlands Area and number of important wetlands Irrigation and drainage projects

20
Swaling is the annual burning of the gorse and scrub in order to thin out the old vegetation in to allow new grass shoots to grow thus
providing grazing for livestock.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Impact Indicators 26
Contributing External Activities
Industrial pollution (effluent discharge); use of fertilisers
Groundwater Quality Chemical composition
and pesticides and other agricultural activities
Groundwater Quantity Extraction rates and depth of water table Industrial and other municipal extractions
Effluent discharge from municipalities and other
Chemical composition biotic
Surface Water Quality industrial complexes
community
Fertiliser and Pesticides use
Extraction for power, irrigation schemes, industrial and
Surface Water Quantity Flow rates
domestic use
Industrial air emissions, high volume and high
Air Quality Chemical composition
concentration of vehicular traffic
Infrastructure activities affecting outside workers; other
Health : HIV/AIDS Reported cases at clinics
new development; expanding urban areas
Health: Waterborne Diseases Reported cases at clinics None apparent
Number of documented conflicts and Any other development activity planned and implemented
Conflicts
nature and seriousness of conflicts in absence of full participatory planning

10.3 Organisation of Monitoring

The implementation of the dam safety construction and I&D schemes rehabilitation under WRIP will
need to be monitored responsibly and in accordance with the Albanian legislative requirements currently
in force, as well as in accordance with the relevant WB OPs.

The Environmental Monitoring Plan/Programme (EMoP) needs to be considered by the stakeholders. The
EMoP is subdivided into socio-economic and environmental issues, but as the monitoring indicators
essentially remain the same during the pre-construction, construction and operational periods of the
project development they are listed together and are assumed to be necessary during all three periods or
phases (Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-43).

The Consultant has also provided on the EMoP the impact, parameter, indicator, monitoring methodology,
frequency, and broad indications of responsibilities although more consultation between the different
stakeholders will be required prior to implementation; and finally cost or indication where costs would be
applied. Many of the costs are not shown at present as it needs to be confirmed who is responsible during
the preconstruction, construction and operational periods of the development; for example some
monitoring can be covered within the existing contractor budget (covered under the WRIP), but it will
need to be ascertained how monitoring will be extended beyond construction.

Current responsibility for monitoring of indicators is split between many different stakeholders and also
at national and municipal level. The Environmental Protection Agency under MEFWA (EPA/REA) in
Albania will play a prominent role in the setup of the monitoring plan for the project. MAFCP,
MEFWA/REA need to decide what elements of monitoring are the contractors responsibility and those
that should be integrated into the national monitoring program for environmental status. There will be a
need to get answers to the following questions:

Do the current communes or regional agencies have a budget for monitoring activities?
Who is responsible for monitoring social indicators?
Who will be responsible for funding the monitoring?
Should the Contractor include the costs for monitoring in tenders?
Will the monitoring be outsourced to a private company?

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

27
Table ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-43: Environmental and Social Monitoring Plan

Impact Parameter Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility Cost

SOCIAL / ECONOMIC
Covered under WRIP
Increased cases of water Review of health MARD up to construction
Water Borne Diseases Disease prevalence Quarterly
borne diseases records Public Health Institute GoA budget during
operation
Reported cases of Review and Continuous/
incidences and accidents evaluation of periodic
Contractor Covered under WRIP
Colour, turbidity and incidents and monitoring
MARD up to construction
Safety Hazards Safety to Humans and Livestock change in seepage chemical accidents register through
National Food Agency and To be determined
content Direct observation of instrumentati
on Regional Inspectorates during operation
Pesticide occurrence in seepage water
foodstuff Instrumentation
Outputs from seismograph Continuous
Instrumentation
stations monitoring
equipment including; MARD
Earthquakes Safety to Humans and Livestock Seepages and leakages through To be determined
Accelerograph, GeoAlba
reported or observed on the instrumentati
survey theodolite etc
dam on
Covered under WRIP
CEIA undertaking Baseline
Crop tonnages up to construction.
Take from INSTAT survey
Economic Development Agricultural production Annual GoA budget during
and MAFCP records MARD
Fertiliser Use operation

Covered under WRIP
Ascertain current CEIA undertaking Baseline
up to construction.
No of employed levels and structure survey
Economic Development Employment Annual GoA budget during
No of unemployed of employment in MARD
operation
Project area
CEIA undertaking Baseline Covered under WRIP
number of tourists Take from INSTAT survey up to construction.
Economic Development Current tourism in project area Annual
Occupancy of Hotel records MARD GoA budget during
operation
Economic Development Fishing and Hunting permits No of tourists Take from MEFWA Annual CEIA undertaking Baseline Covered under WRIP
issued in project area records survey up to construction.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Impact Parameter Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility Cost

MARD 28
GoA budget during
operation
ENVIRONMENTAL
50 USD per sampling
Nutrient Load (Nitrates, Bi-Annually during ME (Environmental and analyses on
phosphates, potassium, wet and dry season Protection Agency) nutrient load
Groundwater Quality pesticide residue, COD & (samples should be Institute for Public Health USD 50 per sample
Water Pollution Seasonally
Surface Water Quality BOD, Turbidity taken from the inlet Institute of oil research, for pesticides
Pesticides and outlet points of Fier 500 USD for
Oil contamination (PAH) the developed area sampling and
analyses of oils
Reduced Water Flow
(only if concerned Quantity of water Flow rates per second River Stream Seasonally
ME (Environmental
Not defined
Gauging Protection Agency)
perennial stream
Soil productivity, gulleys, MARD
Soil erosion Soil cover loss Observation Continuous No additional cost
water turbidity

Floods downstream of
Observation and MTE(Environmental
Flooding Area inundated reported cases of Continuous No additional cost
project area Protection Agency)
flooding
Insufficient water amount MTE (Environmental
Water wastage Water availability for irrigation purposes, Install water meters Continuous Protection Agency) No additional cost
compares with volumes DIDs
expected
Populations of important ME (Environmental
Loss of Biodiversity Flora and Fauna Observation Seasonally Not defined
flora and fauna Protection Agency)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
11 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS - CAPACITY BUILDING
This section defined the responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring along with arrangements for
information flow, especially for coordination between agencies responsible for mitigation; e.g., for
enforcement of remedial actions, monitoring of implementation, training, financing, and reporting.

The proposed WRIP responds to requests from MARD and DSDC, and integrates strategic support for
IWRM and institutional support and investments in the rehabilitation of reservoirs and associated
irrigation and drainage infrastructure, to be implemented by MARD. The WRIP is being undertaken using
World Bank financing in the form of a loan.

The roles and responsibilities of different levels of government and stakeholders have been described in
earlier sections of this ESFD. The institutional arrangements proposed for the successful mainstreaming
of the environmental and social considerations are as follows:

MARD need to ensure that they have the necessary staff allocated for the project once the
construction starts and to ensure that the mitigation measures proposed within the site specific
ESMPs are included in the bidding document, including the Bill of Quantities, and that a specific
budget is allocated for implementing the mitigation measures.
The project's physical infrastructure (dam rehabilitation and I&D works) will be built by contractors
commissioned through a tender process. During the construction period and defects liability period,
the contractor will be supervised, on behalf of the MARD, by a supervision engineering consultant
(SEC).
When the dams have been rehabilitated and the irrigations schemes have been commissioned the
respective DIDs/municipalities will take over operation and maintenance on behalf of the MARD.

11.1 Training
A key component of the success of the ESMP depends of effective capacity building of the MARD, the
training of staff and all others stakeholder organisations involved in the ESMP, including the
rehabilitation of construction contractor, and the SEC which is planned under WRIP Component 2 Item
B. It is proposed that these activities could be assisted by the implementation of technical assistance (TA)
from outside consultants on an as required basis.

It is obvious that all those responsible for the management, implementation and operation of any aspect of
the different Site Specific ESMPs shall be adequately trained for their role. It is proposed that training
records should be kept for all stakeholder employees, to provide evidence for auditing/inspection
purposes. This is considered a very useful indicator of the overall project achievements.

The following training can be considered for the following organizations.

11.1.1 Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development

The MARD will provide an Environmental Engineer (reassigned from another department) to oversee the
preparation, implementation and oversight of the ESMP and its associated sub plans (e.g. EMiP and
EMoP) as the WRIP progresses and beyond, perhaps assisted by an independent environmental
monitoring consultant (see below). MARD could consider utilising some of the allocated budget under
WRIP Component 2 part B for this.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
At present, Albanias strategy on PPP focuses specifically on trade, use, storage, transport and disposal of
pesticides and as such falls short to provide comprehensive guidance on integrated pest management. In
view of EU accession, the GOA intends to prepare a more comprehensive strategy on IPM that would
reflect guidance from the EU Framework Directive on Sustainable Pest Management. In the absence of an
Albania IPM strategy, specific activities to promote IPM will therefore derive their inspiration from the
EU Directive, until an Albania IPM strategy is in place.

Within the context of its objectives and activities, WRIP will contribute to supporting the strategy on PPP
and measures to promote IPM by providing training to farmers/WUOs, DIDs and municipalities as part of
its overall training program. WRIP will not provide support for the preparation of the IPM strategy. The
training curriculum will include a number of themes related with the risks and hazards and safe practices
for handling, storing, using and disposal of pesticides, and also in sustainable pest management based on
an IPM approach. The provisions for this training will be described in more detail in the Pest
Management section of the Site Specific ESMP for I&D schemes.

The training curriculum will include the following issues:

IPM strategies and techniques,

Integrated crop management strategies and techniques,
Organic farming principles, biological pest control methods,
Information on the general principles and crop or sector-specific guidelines for
IPM.

Furthermore specific IPM training can be extended to include the prevention and/or
suppression of harmful organisms by:
crop rotation,
use of adequate cultivation techniques (e.g. sowing dates and densities, under-sowing, conservation
(zero) tillage, pruning and direct sowing),
use, where appropriate, of resistant/tolerant cultivars and standard/certified seed and planting
material,
use of balanced fertilisation, liming and irrigation/drainage practices,
preventing the spreading of harmful organisms by hygiene measures (e.g. by regular cleansing of
machinery and equipment) and
protection and enhancement of important beneficial organisms, e.g. by adequate plant protection
measures or the utilisation of ecological infrastructures inside and outside production sites

The Environmental Engineer should be provided with enough technical and financial resources to
complete this training role; external resources through TA may be required on occasions. Specific training
for the Environmental Engineer could include the following:

Principles and procedures for environmental impact assessment;

Fundamentals of environmental management;
Compliance assessment, monitoring and follow-up;

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Environmental audits;
Social impact assessment and public consultation; and
Trained expertise in water quality testing and analysis.

11.1.2 Supervising Engineering Consultant

The SEC hired for the supervision should have environmental staff trained to ensure contractor
compliance with ESMP requirements. Alternatively, the SEC can sub-contract this responsibility to
adequately trained personnel on the approval of MARD. Training records, including attendance and
specific course, shall be maintained for inspection by MARD. Specific training to the environmental staff
within SEC should be provided as follows:

Principles and procedures for environmental impact assessment;

Fundamentals of environmental management;
Compliance assessment, monitoring and follow-up;
Air, soil and water sampling procedures;
Construction impacts, including civil works, sediment and erosion control, soil handling and
vegetation removal;
Waste management;
Fuel and hazardous materials management;
Fundamentals of aquatic ecology ;
Construction camp management; and
Auditing and follow-up

11.1.3 The Rehabilitation Construction Contractor

The rehabilitation construction contractor (RCC) shall have environmental staff trained to ensure
contractor and all subcontractor compliance with ESMP requirements. The RCC shall maintain training
records, including attendance and specific course, for inspection by the MARD. Specific training to the
RCC environmental unit should be provided as follows:

Fundamentals of environmental management;

Compliance assessment, monitoring and follow-up;
Air, soil and water sampling procedures;
Construction impacts, including civil works, sediment and erosion control, soil handling and
vegetation removal;
Waste management;
Fuel and hazardous materials management;
Construction camp management;
Community relations and public consultation procedures; and
Auditing and follow-up.

11.1.4 Independent Environmental Monitoring Consultant

The Independent Environmental Monitoring Consultant (IEMC) should be trained in the oversight and
compliance assessment of dam rehabilitation and I&D infrastructure projects, including the preparation of
compliance reports and environmental sampling procedures, including the following:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Principles and procedures for environmental impact assessment;

Fundamentals of environmental management;
Compliance assessment, monitoring and follow-up;
Air, soil and water sampling procedures;
Construction impacts, including civil works, sediment and erosion control, soil handling and
vegetation removal;
Waste management;
Fuel and hazardous materials management;
Construction camp management;
Community relations and public consultation procedures; and
Auditing and follow-up

11.1.5 Technical Assistance

In addition to staff training, technical assistance using outside consultants has been included into the
training budget. Technical assistance could be full-time onsite within the MARD or include short visits by
outside consultants to provide training seminars and workshops etc.

Training costs are estimated in Chapter 13.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
12 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING PROCEDURES
12.1 Implementation Schedule

The timing, frequency and duration of mitigation measures and monitoring should be included in an
implementation schedule, showing phasing and coordination with procedures. After referring to the
Feasibility Study (FS) prepared by Mott McDonald, the maximum period planned for construction taking
into consideration the different options is no more than 12 months (for Murriz Thana) with the majority
being estimated to last for about 3 to 6 months.

Notwithstanding, it is important that the works are carefully timed to ensure that works that could affect
stability are carried out when the reservoir has been drawn down, and there is limited rainfall expected
(i.e. work in the driest season). When works are required at the outlet, there will be no diversion and this
will need to be carefully timed. The weather is also a significant consideration, with earthmoving works
and other works avoided during the wetter months.

The FS do not actually specify any date for start-up of the dam and I&D schemes rehabilitation works,
but they give indications of preferred months of operations due to the reasons outlined in the previous
paragraph. In order to obtain an implementation schedule Figure IMPLEMENTATION PLAN -
REPORTING PROCEDURES-18 shows the current thinking on the dam rehabilitation construction
works schedule and indicates that works for construction would continue throughout 2013. Of course
such a schedule needs to be confirmed by the relevant stakeholders and MAFCP may wish to only
schedule a few of the dams over a number of years. It is assumed these issues will become more concrete
after comments are received to the FS.

12.2 Reporting procedures

12.2.1 Construction
Ultimately, the Contractors for the dam and I&D schemes rehabilitation, in accordance with the Contract
provision, will be accountable for the implementation of the majority of the mitigation measures during
the construction phase.

In the schedule of works, the Contractors must include all proposed mitigation measures, and the
Supervising Engineers should also ensure that the schedules and monitoring plans are complied with. This
will lend a sense of ownership to the Contractors. Diligence on the part of the Contractors and proper
supervision during both the construction and defects liability period are crucial to the success of
mitigating impacts. It is expected that all experts proposed for the implementation works will have
appropriate certification and accreditation with the relevant Albanian Government departments and
institutions.

The progress reports to be prepared by the Consultant will include data and information on health and
safety (accidents and incidents), environmental protection (spill and non-compliance), labour (numbers,
grades, problems), community relations (complaints, issues), and relevant training.

The supervision consultant will need to check the contractor's reports and forward them to the Employer
(presumably MAFCP), including any additional records concerning implementation of the project's RAP
and ESMP.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Figure IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING PROCEDURES-18: Construction Schedule from I&D Project (months taken from Feasibility Studies)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Source: Adapted from Mott MacDonald Feasibility Study

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

4
It is important that the Employer's, SEC and the Contractors staff on site establish and maintain effective
communication links between each other and other stakeholders (i.e. the communes) to ensure easy two-
way flow of information.

Table IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING PROCEDURES-44 below describes the proposed lines
of communication for local residents, construction workers, employees and other project-related
individuals with respect to filing grievances or incidences throughout the construction and operation of
the rehabilitation projects. This proposed communication pathway can be fine-tuned once the
construction project commences.
Table IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING PROCEDURES-44: Proposed Communication Pathway
Type of Potential Interest /
Means of Contact Key Contact
Stakeholder Concern
Adequate compensation package (financial
assistance, etc.) Complaints/concerns shall
Disturbance from construction camp and be communicated to local
associated activities (alcohol, environmental village leaders and then
Local residents
issues, etc.) onwards to authorities
directly affected
Loss of productive lands, fisheries, etc. through a grievance process
by the
Access to community services (medical, (Grievance Redress
development To be discussed
education, telephone, market, etc.) Mechanism that needs to
works and
Maintenance of cultural heritage be created).
downstream
Safety and security of local villages and Information broadcasts and
users
communes project updates shall be
Information broadcasts on potential hazards provided by the Contractor
(blasting, road closures, reduced river access, to local residents
etc.)
Employment opportunities Recruitment of locals at the
Adequate accommodation and subsistence project site through word of
Potential
provided mouth (give this priority) Contractor
Employees
resources (food, water, etc.) and shelter Issues shall be conveyed to
Competitive wages site foremen
Monitoring committee
Government Persistent environmental and socio-economic
comprising of agreed forum To be discussed
Stakeholders impacts
of members (for discussion)
Worker code of conduct
Social conflicts between local residents and Weekly meetings with
Construction
workers construction workers
workers and Contractor
Behaviour issues (gambling, drunkenness, etc.) Individual meeting with
camp sites
Environmental issues (exploitation of natural disorderly workers
resources, etc.)

12.2.2 Operation
Once the irrigation dams and ancillary access roads are in operation, maintenance will be a key factor in
protecting the environment. During this project operation a large number of environmentally and socially
related measures and programmes will be implemented, by different organisations. Reporting on these
will be un-coordinated unless a single management organisation is established to manage and track all
aspects of the project. In practical terms, this would be done most easily by Directorate Of Irrigation and
Drainage and Regional Environmental Agency.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

5
12.2.3 Reporting Plan
Reports shall be produced through the course of implementation of monitoring programs during the
construction and operations phases of the project and will include such things as, collecting incident/
grievances forms, consulting with local residents and project-affected communes and auditing
performance of existing programs/mitigation measures under the WRIP.

The MARD should provide the World Bank with report updates for the duration of the WRIP. Frequency
of reporting to the World Bank and MARD will vary depending on the nature of the non-compliance and
with the agreed monitoring schedule. Table IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING
PROCEDURES-45 describes the types of reports that shall be produced and gives indications of the
reporting responsibilities.
Table IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - REPORTING PROCEDURES-45: Suggestions of External Reporting
Type of Purpose of Frequency of
Responsibility Submit to:
Report Reporting Submission
Filing/notification of
Accidents/ Within 24 hours of
Incident Report
accidents or unplanned
the incident
MARD
events
Detail the cause, nature MARD
and effect of any
Non-compliance Within one week of
environmental and/or
Contractors Report the event
socio-economic non-
HSE Officer
compliant act performed
Report of MARD
compliance and non-
Monthly Compliance Report to the Construction
compliance
Report Engineering Consultant
measures on a
monthly basis
Checklist of environmental
Daily Compliance
and social compliance of Daily Internal
Checklist
Supervising construction
Engineering Monthly report of MARD
Consultant Monthly Compliance compliance within 10 days
Monthly
Report of receipt of report from
Contractor
EMP updates, including MARD
any changes in For approval prior to As required, prior to
management or implementation implementation
monitoring procedures
Key changes in project MARD
Independent Ensure compliance with
activities that may As required, prior to
Environmental environmental regulatory
trigger Environmental implementation
Monitoring approvals
Approvals
Consultant
Dependent on
Notification of non-
Environmental compliance with standard
environmental MARD
parameter: weekly, Environmental
monitoring reports environmental guidelines
monthly, quarterly or Agency
and parameters
annually

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

1
13 COST ESTIMATES AND SOURCE OF FUNDS
13.1 Cost Estimates
Section 10 of this ESFD has provided some indication of costs, both in terms of initial investments and
recurring expenses for implementing all the measures defined in the Plan which can then be integrated
into the total project costs and factored into financing negotiations. Estimated costs for the initial
implementation of the ESMP are presented below in Table COST ESTIMATES AND SOURCE OF
FUNDS-46. Costs have been defined on an initial set up basis and will be included where relevant into
the Contractors tender. It is proposed that MARD would revise these costs and develop annual operating
costs for the ESMP on a yearly basis.
Table COST ESTIMATES AND SOURCE OF FUNDS-46: Preliminary Estimates of ESMP Costs
ESMP Components Estimate Costs USD
Suggest take around, 8-12% of
total construction costs
Contractor ESMP measures built into contract specifications According to FS Consultant Dam
Rehab cost USD 10.5 million,21
therefore:1,050,000
Suggest to take around 20% of
engineering supervision cost (5% of
construction costs
Supervising Engineering Consultant environment to be built into the contract
Therefore USD 100,000
for SEC (this includes sampling for environmental quality)
Plus USD 50,000
( separate estimate for
environmental quality monitoring)
Independent Environmental Monitoring Say USD 75,000 (over 3 years)
Institutional Strengthening, Training and Capacity Building
Environmental Engineer
MAFCP Pesticide section
Local authorities, communities and other stakeholders (including farmers)
On-site training
Offsite training
USD 250,000
Local capacity building
Equipment and logistics
Awareness raising on sustainable pest management based upon an IPM
approach
Risks and hazards and safe practices for handling, storing, using and disposal
of pesticides
Technical Assistance
Provision of outside consultants
Manual of functions and procedures
Assist in development of environmental database
Special issues e.g. water quality with IPH testing and analysis
Say USD 75,000 (over 3 years)
EMP protocols and procedures
Assist in developing IPM approach
Assist in implementation of updated management plans
Contractor liaison
TORs
TOTAL COSTS USD 1,600,000

21
Total combined cost of dam rehabilitation and irrigation schemes improvements is USD 37.3 million

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
As mitigating costs may occur at points during project implementation, construction or operations,
indications of cash flow are provided but may need to change after stakeholder review. It is important to
capture all costs including administrative, design and consultancy, and operational and maintenance
costs resulting from meetings that require changes to standards or modifications to project design.

Many of the measures in the ESMP relate to project planning and preparation, or are standard best
practice during construction, as a management overhead. Therefore no costs are attributed to them in the
ESMP table. Measures with identifiable costs are listed.

The total cost of the environmental and social mitigation and enhancement measures for dam safety
including monitoring is estimated at USD 1.6 million over 3 years. This total excludes:

The cost for the rehabilitation of the I&D schemes as these have not reached preliminary design
Land acquisition and compensation, resettlement (not probably relevant), land redistribution and
consolidation, and associated institutional strengthening, as well as support for vulnerable households
affected by changes to land tenure - these costs are to be detailed in the RAPs if required;
Health measures and health monitoring - full details of these activities are to be developed by the
IPH; a nominal sum of USD 100,000 has been included for health and safety during construction as
well as USD 50,000 for the public awareness campaigns during construction.
A number of measures identified as important for project success but which are not strictly
environmental and social mitigation measures, including (a) capital investments, (b) enhanced support
for WUO formation and operation, (c) agricultural and agronomic activities (research, extension and
training, implementation of the necessary livestock, mechanisation and pest management plans, (d)
contributions to regional initiatives i.e., fisheries (i.e. hatcheries), and (e) community development
activities.

13.2 Source of Funds

It is assumed that the funds for paying for the activities associated with the construction phase of the
project will come from the World Bank WRIP Loan. As mentioned previously, the majority of the
mitigation measures and most of the monitoring for the EMSP will be integrated within the contracts for
dam and I&D Scheme rehabilitation. This implies that there is funding cover during the construction. It
may also be possible to include some mitigation/ monitoring in the Defects Liability Period (DLP) which
is assumed to extend for 12 months beyond the completion dates for the contracts.

What is less clear and needs further discussion is how the proposed mitigation measures and monitoring
intended for the operational phase of the dams and I&D schemes will be achievable and where the source
of funding for this will come from.

The WRIP (Component 4 part B) provides for the establishment of a monitoring and evaluation system
but only on key performance output and impact indicators.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

14 PUBLIC CONSULTATION
MARD has the responsibility to effectively engage stakeholders in achieving the WRIP objectives for the
benefit of all. The implementation of the WRIP overall depends on the meaningful participation of all
stakeholders for success.

A public consultation plan (PCP) provides a framework for achieving effective stakeholder involvement
and promoting greater awareness and understanding of issues so that the project is carried out effectively
within budget and on-time to the satisfaction of all concerned.

To ensure effective implementation of PCP, the MARD should be committed to the following principles:

Promoting openness and communication

Ensuring effective stakeholder involvement in the development of the project.
Increasing public knowledge and understanding of the project implementation process.
Using all strategies and techniques which provide appropriate, timely and adequate opportunities for
all concerned parties to participate.
Evaluating the effectiveness of the engagement plan in accordance with the expected outcomes.

14.1 Identifying Stakeholders

Stakeholders for the purpose of this project shall be defined as all those people and institutions that have
an interest in the successful planning and execution of the project. This includes those likely to be
positively and negatively affected by the project. Table 9-1 identifies the key stakeholders.

The implementation of the WRIP overall depends on the meaningful participation of all stakeholders for
success. Consequently the public consultation process has commenced. Meetings have been organised
between the decision makers and the other stakeholders in each of the districts that contained the reservoir
sites.

Invitees included farmers, Drainage Board staff, commune heads and representatives of the communes,
experts on reservoir operation, and agricultural experts. A social and environmental expert from the
Consultant also attended the meetings. Questionnaires were prepared and completed. Full details of the
meetings and the questionnaires circulated are shown in Annex C

14.2 Consultation Strategy

The consultation process shall ensure that all those identified as stakeholders are spoken and conferred
with. The relevant section/department within the MARD should share information about the project with
the public, to enable meaningful contribution and thus enhance the success of the WRIP.

Public consultation should take place through workshops, seminars, meetings, radio programs, request for
written proposals/comments, questionnaire administration, public reading and explanation of project ideas
and requirements.

The consultation plan would be monitored by MARD and EPAs who will set their own verifiable
indicators to assess the degree of participation of the key stakeholder during all the phases of WRIP
implementation.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
14.3 Level of Engagement
The level of stakeholder involvement will be based on the project phase, location and expected outcome.
The extent of stakeholder involvement would be based on the following;

The project is likely to have significant impacts, that is, high impacts in one area/location, or
relatively small impacts spread out over a large area. The WRIP falls into the latter category.
The project involves significant issues, implying that a wider stakeholder audience may be affected.
This is not considered to be relevant for WRIP.

This is illustrated in Figure PUBLIC CONSULTATION-19 below.

Anticipated Stakeholder Engagement

Objective Objective Objective Objective

Provide public with Obtain public feedback on Work with the public to Partner with the public in
objective information to analysis, alternative or ensure concerns are Identification of preferred
assist them in understanding decision understood and considered. solution.
the issue.

Tools Tools Tools Tools

Meetings Questionnaires Networking Meetings
Public Notice Surveys Questionnaires Public Notice
Exhibition Focus Group Notice Exhibition Exhibition

Figure PUBLIC CONSULTATION- 19: Spectrum of Engagement

Through these engagement strategies; the MARD would be able to:

Clarify the project's objectives in terms of stakeholders' needs and concerns

Identify feasible alternative (in particular alternative locations) and examine their relative merits in
terms of environmental, social and economic factors
Identify and prioritise environmental issues, and establish the scope of future studies, and
Identify processes for continued stakeholders' involvement.

14.4 Points Raised from Public Consultation meetings

In general the meetings were conducted in a cordial manner and were very informative. Issues that arose
were on matters regarding the water quality of the water, this particularly concerned Murriz Thana
reservoir.

At least two other reservoirs are used or intended for use as small scale hydropower production. Belesova
reservoir has a small hydropower facility and one is intended for Murriz Thana.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

Other points that were raised were on the siltation, as many of the sites were prone to high rates of
sedimentation which is seriously reducing the reservoir capacity.

In most of the sites drinking water is obtained from wells or other natural water sources, and it is of
satisfactory quality. Sewage is discharged into tanks (not septic) but small amounts are flushed into the
reservoirs (e.g. Belesova reservoir) during heavy rainfall. New buildings (house and restaurants) are
being built close to the reservoirs and there is some concern on pollution to the irrigation water.

However, in general all the participants were positive and interested at the immediate project
implementation despite the above environmental concerns and fully agreed with the proposed mitigation
and monitoring processes.

14.5 Resettlement Policy Framework

The Terms of Reference for the ESIA requested the resettlement policy framework (RPF) to be prepared
as a separate document. The contents of the RFP can be shown as follows:

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Background
1.2 Project Components
1.3 The Project Area
1.4 Objectives and Principles of Resettlement Policy Framework
1.5 Objectives and Process for Resettlement Action Plans
1.6 Layout of the Resettlement Policy Framework
2 INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK
2.1 Institutional Framework
2.2 Legal Framework
3 ELIGIBILITY AND ENTITLEMENTS
3.1 Eligibility
3.2 Entitlements
3.3 Valuing Affected Assets
4 RAP INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Census and Inventory of Project Affected Persons
4.2 Identification of Losses
4.3 Baseline Survey
5 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION/GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES
5.1 Consultation with Affected Populations
5.2 Monitoring Income Restoration
5.3 Mechanisms for consultations
5.4 Description of the implementation process
5.5 Arrangements for funding resettlement
5.6 Responsible Institutions and/or Agencies
5.7 Grievance Redress Mechanisms
6 COSTS AND BUDGETS
7 ANNEXES
7.1 Annex 1: Proposed Formats for RAP and Abbreviated RAP
7.2 Annex 2: Provisional Entitlement and Compensation Matrix
7.3 Annex 3: Checklist and Data Requirements for Census
7.4 Annex 4: List of Data for Inventory of Losses
7.5 Annex 5: Data for Baseline Survey

The RPF has been prepared and is available as a separate document.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

15 ANNEXES
15.1 Annex A1 Questionnaire for EU Candidature Point 54 For PPP

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

2
ANNEX A1
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR EU CANDIDATURE

Point 54. Plant health; Plant Protection Products (PPP):

- Launching in the market of Plant Protection Products;

- Defining and inspecting maximal levels of remnants

A. Competent and responsible authorities.

MARD , through:

Directorate of Animal Health and Plant Protection (DAHPP), in the area of for plants protection
products, is the competent authority in the Republic of Albania regarding issues of developing
policies, inspection activities, respective administrative procedures of registration and monitoring, as
well as in the international cooperation;
Directorate of Food Safety and Consumers Protection (DFSCP) is the central competent authority for
remnants of products for the protection of plants and products of vegetative origin.

MARD, together with the Ministry of Tourism and Environmentand the Ministry of Health is responsible
for drafting regulations on the registration of products for the protection of plants (PPP).

The institutions responsible for assessing the files during the registration procedures regarding
toxicological and eco- toxicological data, as well as for carrying out physical- chemical assessments and
biological analyses of products for the production of plants are: Institute for Public Health; Ministry of
Tourism and Environment, Institute for Food Safety and Veterinary (FSVI); Department of Plant
Protection, from University of Agriculture, Tirana.

Registration procedures of PPP are as follows:

PPP Registration Office (in the Plant Protection Division at the DAHPP) handles the registration file,
which contains technical documentation and complementary documentation (request for registration,
original or notarized certificate of registration in one or two EU countries including the respective
label) and after treating it, approves the beginning of registration procedures. If the Registration
Office does not approve the file within 30 days, it sends a written notification to the applicant
describing the reasons of not approving or requests additional data. In addition, the applicant sends
for treatment (analyses) the following: the PPP sample, sample packaging, analytical standard of the
PPP ingredients for further analyses in the laboratory of PPP at the FSVI.
PPP documentation is submitted at the assessment institutes within 20 days from the date of approval.
Assessment institutes make the assessment of the documentation data of PPP within a period of six
months, by preparing for each PPP the respective monograph, which is sent to DAHPP.
PPP Registration Office, based on the monograph for each PPP, prepares the briefing material for the
next meeting of the State Committee for the Registration of PPP.
PPP Registration Office, based on the briefing material and the outcomes of the State Committee for
the Registration of PPP, prepares the registration document for each approved PPP, as well as notifies
the applicant ofthe registration or not of the PPP.
The registration document of the PPP is issued by the Executive of the DAHPP and contains the
registration certificate and the PPP label.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

3
MAFCP is responsible for PPP regarding regulations as well as carrying out the inspection procedures. In
addition, it is responsible for the start and follow-up of PPP registration procedures.
The procedure of issuing the registration document (the Certificate and the Label) for marketing and
using PPP is the final administrative stage of registration and is followed by the final list of the registered
PPP. This list is compiled whenever changes are made in it, and is published in the Official Website of the
MAFCP.

Institute for Food Safety and Veterinary (FSVI) at MAFCP:

PPP laboratories are included in the Plant Protection Division, which is under the authority of (FSVI) and
cooperates with the Animal Health and Plant Protection Directorate at the MAFCP. This divisions main
activity is: the assessment of PPP under registration process (treatment of files, physical-chemical
verification of ingredients of the PPP; physical-chemical verification of PPP which are found in the
Albanian market. This is made in the framework of continuous monitoring in order to keep under control
possible misuse that might occur in the market.
This division started functioning in 2009. The reconstruction of this division and its supply with
contemporary equipments, which started in 2008, was enabled by the state budget with a total investment
of 59,000,000 (fifty nine million) leke. The equipments of the laboratory are contemporary and sufficient
for carrying out the above-mentioned analyses.
The main analytical methods used for physical-chemical analyses for PPP forms are: CIPAC, and
analytical methods for pesticides, which are attached to the registration file. These laboratories are highly
accurate thanks to the infrastructure and contemporary instruments that this structure holds.
In the near future the division of PPP remnants in vegetative products is planned to be created in this
institute. Of course, this requires investment for building the necessary infrastructure, its supply with
equipments from contemporary methodologies and additional staff in the structure of this institute.
Analytical methods for the analyses of PPP remnants include analytical methods for pesticides, which are
attached to the registration file (for the moment the remnants analyses has not started yet).

State Committee for the Registration of PPP:

State Committee for the Registration of PPP, set up in the DFSCP, at the Ministry of Agriculture is
composed of seven members:

a. One representative from the Plant Protection Service at the Ministry of Agriculture;
b. One representative (hygienist), from the Ministry of Health;
c. One representative (environmental expert), from the Ministry of Tourism and Environment;
d. One representative (work safety expert), covering the field of safety at work;
e. One representative chemist analyst from the Institute for Public Health;
f. One expert from the Institute for Food Safety and Veterinary;
g. One professor from the Department of Plant Protection, from University of Agriculture.

The list of the committee members is approved by order of the Minister of Agriculture, after the proposal
made by the respective institutions.

Committee members must not have conflict of interest in the field of PPP. They have to declare in
advance their relations, if any, with PPP import or marketing subjects.
The committee serves as a counselling body the functioning of which is regulated by order of the Minister
of Agriculture.

Phitosanitary Inspectorate at the Regional Directorate of Agriculture, Food and Consumers Protection
in regions:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

4
The activities of PPP inspection, which are carried out by Phitosanitary Inspectorate at the Regional
Directorate of Agriculture, Food and Consumers Protection from the import to their use, include:
administrative activities of inspecting and those related to legal issues; inspections of PPP remnants in
plants and products of vegetative origin in the Albanian market (this activity has not started yet because
there is no laboratory of PPP remnants); inspecting the import and transit of PPP (is carried out by the
Phitosanitary Inspectorate in the border crossing points, in addition to quarantine inspection of plants,
vegetative products, and other objects); approval for the functioning of the wholesale warehouses and
PPP retail units; verification of fulfilling the technical criteria for equipment with selling permit for
persons or interested subjects; quality inspection of PPP after registration by taking samples for analyses
and sending them to the FSVI; the implementation of law regarding labelling and packaging of PPP.

At local level phitosanitary inspection is carried out by Phitosanitary Inspectorate, which operates in the
offices of the state administrations in 12 regions.
Phitosanitary Inspectorate in border crossing points is part of the structure of Phitosanitary Inspectorate at
the Regional Directorate of Agriculture.
Until now, this inspection has been focused mainly on implementing the law from the import to PPP use.

With the set up and functioning of the PPP laboratory, the inspection has started by taking samples for
analyses of PPP after registration. Samples have been sent to laboratory at the FSVI for physical and
chemical analyses of PPP, to verify if their physical and chemical data are identical with those declared in
the registration file of the PPP submitted by the producers (applicants). This activity has just started partly
with analyses of imported PPP (10-12 samples sent for analyses within a period of 3-4 months), for the
laboratory of analyses has started to function in this period. The present legislation of the protection of
plants which is related to PPP has provided in a general manner the methods of carrying out certain
procedures. For example, procedures of inspection, methods of taking samples for analyses, etc.

Ministry of Health (MoH)

MoH is responsible for PPP regarding setting the regulations of registration and assessment criteria as
well as for carrying out assessments of documentation regarding toxicological data and classification of
PPP in toxicity category. This institution makes the assessment of qualification of PPP in a toxicity
category.

In addition, the approval for the functioning of wholesale warehouses of PPP is made by the State
Sanitary Inspectorate.
Activities related to the toxicological studies have been delegated from the Ministry to the Institute for
Public Health.

The Laboratory of Instrumental Chemistry, as a unit of the Department of Health and Environment,
carries out in practice all the activities which are related to water, air, soil and food toxicological analyses.
This laboratory carries out even the assessment of PPP toxicology documentation during the registration
and issues an assessment toxicological report (monograph). Actually, it does not carry out the
examination of toxicological samples. The unit has a total of seven employees at disposal for work, from
which four are senior chemists and three laboratory technicians. These employees also carry out other
tasks included in the institutes scope of work. One expert is responsible of issuing reports of
toxicological assessment in addition to other tasks. The number of experts is adequate for the present
workload.

Working premises are insufficient while laboratory equipments are contemporary.

Ministry of Tourism and Environment:

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

5
MEFWA is responsible for PPP in setting registration regulations and assessment criteria as well as in
carrying out assessments of documentation regarding eco- toxicological data and the classification of PPP
related to their impact on the environment.

The conditions of environmental permit for eliminating PPP by incineration, as well as those of the
functioning of the PPP wholesale warehouses are set by this ministry, through Directorate of Assessment
of Environmental Impact and Permits and verifies them through the Environment Inspectorate. The
present staff, in addition to other tasks provided by the environmental law, covers even the two above-
mentioned activities.

The evaluation of PPP registration documentation is carried out by the Judicial Directorate of Pollution
Prevention at the MEFWA.

There is lack of adequate staff for carrying out this activity. In the framework of the reconstruction of the
ministry, there will be an expert handling chemicals, including PPP.

Department of Plant Protection, at the University of Agriculture, Tirana:

This department is a basic unit at the Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, of the University of
Agriculture, Tirana, which is under the authority of the Ministry of Education and Science.
Part of the internal organisation of this department is the Laboratory of Plant Protection, which, in
accordance with the provisions of the effective Law on Plant Protection, has been authorised to carry out
professional and technical activity related to products for the protection of plants, for assessing PPP files,
as well as to carry out agronomic and biological analyses of PPP, when such a thing is requested by the
DAHPP.

In addition, for carrying out various analyses and experiments for the protection of plants, this laboratory
owns six hectares of land, including: one hectare of fruit trees, 0,4 hectares of vineyard, 600 square
meters of screen house covered by net, 300 square meters of screen house covered by glass, 2,8 hectares
of field and another area of land.

Ministry of the Interior (MoI)

This ministry is responsible for PPP regarding:
the functioning of PPP wholesale warehouses, and gives its approval through the state police,
regulations and measures for protection from fire.

Ideas about the future

Even in the future, the structure and functions of competent bodies, those responsible as well as technical
and scientific institutions, for the PPP registration activity will remain the same. There is expected only
one change that has to do with transferring the laboratories of the Department of Plant Protection to the
Institute for Food Safety and Veterinary. Thus, the Ministry of Education and Science is left out of the
present scheme.
As far as monitoring the process from marketing to using PPP and their remnants is concerned, this
activity will continued to be carried out within the MAFCP, but under the authority of NFA, which will
include even Phitosanitary Inspectorate.

While the inspection of PPP remnants in products of vegetative origin, which are used as food for people
and animals, in the Albanian market will be carried out by the food inspectorate of NFA in regions (this
activity has not started yet, for there is no laboratory of PPP remnants).

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

6
While the unit of plant protection at the MAFCP will be directly responsible for developing the respective
legislation as well as for consolidating issues related to PPP and their remnants, for example, compiling
and extending respective regulations and coordination with existing professional institutions, most of
which will continue to be involved in these activities, as well as in international cooperation. This unit
will be responsible even for the registration of PPP.

Proceedings on the MAFCP legislation on the PPP remnants have just started, while analyses of their
remnants have not started yet due to lack of laboratory infrastructure. In the future, MAFCP will continue
to be the competent authority for legislative issues regarding PPP and their remnants, in alignment with
the respective directives and decisions of the EU.

As a major objective, the legal package for PPP remnants will be developed, while the implementation of
this legislation is expected to start with the setting up of the remnants laboratory at the FSVI.

B. Adaptation and implementation of the legislation

- Law 9362/24.03.2005 on Plant Protection Service amended; Official Gazette 29/3.5.2005.
- Decision of the Council of Ministers 1188/20.8.2008 on Approving regulations for importing,
marketing, transporting, storing, using and eliminating PPP, Official Gazette 141/11.9.2008.
- Decision of the Council of Ministers 1555/12.11.2008 on Approval of regulations of the PPP
registration and assessment criteria, Official Gazette183/22.12.2008.

Plant Protection Law contains a certain number of basic provisions for PPP, based on the EU directives
regarding:

- registration, where it specifies that all PPP that enter and/or are used in the territory of the
Republic of Albania be subject to registration procedures, allowing only the registration of PPP
which have been registered in the countries of the EU;
- appointing PPP assessment institutions during the procedure of their registration;
- importing and marketing of PPP;
- transporting, storing and using PPP;
- classifying PPP in three groups: very risky, risky, other;
- classifying persons that deal with marketing and using PPP.

Decision of Council of Ministers on Approval of regulations of the PPP registration and assessment
criteria, Official Gazette183/22.12.2008, has adapted Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 in relation
to specifying plant protection products in the market, including its amendments related to: the content of
the registration documentation with detailed requests and complete data (on its annexes); registration
regulations and requests that PPP need to fulfil in order to be registered; the conditions in which
registration, modification, cancelling, dismissal, re-registtration , enlargement of the scope of PPP use are
carried out; criteria of authorisation and usage for experimental purposes; information on potential
dangerous effects on the human and animal health, underground waters and the environment; storing data
and confidentiality.

The most detailed explanation on the registration is provided in section A 1.

As far as classification, labelling and packaging of PPP is concerned, there has been given detailed
information about: content of the label, which necessarily must be in Albanian, its designing and sticking
on the package; requirements which must be met by the subjects dealing with PPP packaging; legal
obligations they must abide by while conducting their activity as well as the activity of PPP trading
subjects requiring to make the packing in the Republic of Albania, etc.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

7
Decision of Council of Ministers on Approving regulations for importing, marketing, transporting,
storing, using and eliminating PPP, Official Gazette 141/11.9.2008 has adapted Directive 91/414/EEC of
15 July 1991 regarding appointing products for the protection of plants in the market, as well as treats
PPP in an elaborated manner in relation to: regulation and trade inspection; issuing of the recipe in use;
storing conditions in warehouses, retail units and latest users; usage and the responsibility of users (the
right to use PPP according to their classification, requests of issuing Capability Certificate, professional
users, preliminary measures taken in the places where they are treated, criteria for using herbicides, as
well as areas where their use is banned, banning the use of PPP in certain areas, preparing the spray
solution, protecting useful insects, especially the bee and pollen, restrictive measures on planting and
densification material, treating spray solutions, left over after work, as well as packaging of used PPP.);
banning the use of planes in treatments; transport requests; regulations in eliminating PPP, including the
manner of elimination, appointing the places of elimination, etc; monitoring their packaging and
recycling; making quality analyses (during registration and when they are launched in the market).

Basic requests from Directive 91/414/EEC have been transposed in the above-mentioned Albanian
legislation, but they do not comply completely with the respective provisions of this Directive.

But, Directive 91/414/EEC shall be in a transitory stage until mid-2010, as it shall be replaced with the
Regulation of the European Parliament and Council, regarding the appointment of plant protection
products in the market. The adaptation of this Regulation will be also the main focus of work related to
the EU legislation in the field of PPP. The aim is that partial transfusion be achieved by the end of 2010,
while the drafting of articles which derive from it be completed within 2012.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

15.2 Annex A2 List of Pesticides permitted- not permitted for import into Albania

List 1 Permitted pesticides for use in Albania (256)

List 2 Pesticides not permitted to be imported within Albania (113)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

10

15.3 Annex B - Environmental Screening Procedures

Activities carried out under the WRIP will need to conform to current Albanian Environmental
Regulations and procedures of the World Banks Safeguards Policies.

The Albanian Law on Environmental Protection requires that any project or activity that will affect, or is
likely to affect the environment, has to receive an Environmental Declaration, Environmental Permit,
Consent or Authorization by the ME before implementation may commence. A Decision by the Council of
Ministers has defined the projects included in this process. Without a positive Environmental Declaration
the Council for Territorial Adjustment (KRT) for the locality will not grant a construction permit and
construction may not legally commence22 and without an Environmental Permit an activity with an
environmental impact may not commence and continue.

The Environmental Declaration is the official document issued by ME after the review of the request and
relevant documentation for the approval of the environmental elements of a project, plan or program that
requires construction works, installations or schemes. If project implementation is performed in compliance
with the Environmental Declaration, the competent authority issues the relevant Environmental Permit, in
compliance with the requirements of Law on Environmental Protection. An Environmental Permit is the
official document issued by the MEFWA, after the review and consultation of the request and its relevant
documentation, with all the concerned stakeholders. It approves the exercise of any activity having an
impact on the environment.

Each form of approval may include mandatory conditions and procedures to be implemented, so that
pollution and damage to the environment do not exceed the allowed norms. The ME has authorized its
local offices (REAs) to issue Environmental Permits for activities with a lesser impact on the
environment, entitled Environmental Authorization (greater impact) and Environmental Consent (lesser
impact).

The Law on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) defines the type and scale of the projects or
activities that require an EIA before implementation. The categories of EIA are:

A Summary (outlined) EIA. This is for projects that may have less significant potential impacts that
still require an expert assessment of their impacts. They include projects listed in Appendix 2 of the
Law on EIA, and any changes or rehabilitations of projects listed in Appendix 1 of the same law.
A Profound (advanced) EIA. This is for projects with significant potential impacts, as listed in
Appendix I of the Law, those projects listed in Appendix 2 of the same law which the MEFWA
considers will have a significant impact on the environment (based on information provided by the
proposer at the time of application, in the manner detailed in Appendix 3 of the Law), and activities
that are to be implemented in a protected area or in the marine environment of the Republic of
Albania

According to the Albanian law on EIA, the Summary EIA shall contain the following information (Article
8):

a) Objective of the project;

22
An environmental approval from the REA/MEFWA is one of several documents that have to be submitted to the local KRT
before a Construction Permit can be awarded. Another document required is an operating permit from the relevant authority, e.g. from
a Water Basin Authority for a water supply or wastewater service.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

11
b) Detailed objective description;
c) Data on present environment of the area and in its vicinity where the project is implemented;
d) Detailed description of all installations that are part of the project or will be used during its
implementation;
e) Construction plan and the deadlines of its implementation;
f) Description of engineered values that are constructed or enlarged and of necessary works for
project implementation;
g) Potential impacts on environment and proposed measures to prevent or bumper these impacts;
h) Monitoring program of project impact on environment;
i) Conformity of the project with territory adjustment plan and with economic development plan of
area where project will be implemented;
j) Summary of consultations with local government bodies, the public and environmental not-for-
profit organizations and of their opinions;
k) Rehabilitative measures in case of pollution and damage of environment as well as their cost;
l) A copy of the license of the legal person or organization that has prepared the EIA report.

It is to be supported by information on the project characteristics, the project location (environmental,

human and cultural data) and the potential project impacts, which will be used by the MEFWA will
determine the need for a Profound EIA. The information required is defined in Appendix 3 of the EIA
Law. In addition to the information required in the Summary EIA the following information shall be
included in the Profound EIA (Article 9):

a) Procedures and reasons of selection of site where project will be implemented, description of at
least two additional options of location of project;
b) Its direct and indirect level of impact on environment;
c) Potential impacts of [project] options on environment and health;
d) Risks of accidents with significant impact on health and environment and measures to prevent
these;
e) Trans-border impact on environment if any;
f) Technical measures plans to prevent and bumper negative impacts on environment;
g) Detailed descriptions about sustainable use of energy, of natural and mining resources;
h) Potential negotiations plan with local government organs, the public and environmental non-for
profit organizations during the phases of planning, review and implementation of the project.

The project proposer is responsible for submitting the application for environmental approval to the
MEFWA. Any EIA report required shall be prepared by an expert certified by the MEFWA for preparing
such reports and for environmental auditing. Currently the MEFWA has licensed approximately 100 such
experts.

Requirements for the implementation of a trans-boundary EIA and other environmental matters are also
included, since Albania has ratified several international environmental conventions including: the Espoo
Convention on Transboundary Impacts; the Barcelona Convention on the protection of marine
environment and coastal areas of the Mediterranean, the Aarhus Convention, and the Basel Convention.

All applications for environmental approvals are submitted to the REA of the region in which the project
will be implemented or the activity will be executed. The REA has certain powers to approve the
implementation and operation of small projects with no significant environmental impacts. In other cases

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

12
it is responsible for reviewing documentation and forwarding to the MEFWA for processing, with
recommendations for approval, rejection or enhancement, as appropriate 23.

The Regional Environmental Inspectorate is responsible for inspecting observance of the ESMP and other
conditions specified in the environmental approval.

Comparison with World Bank Policies

Under the World Banks procedures for EA, projects are categorized as listed in Table B1.

Table B1: World Bank Screening Criteria

Category Environmental Impact Examples
Project is likely to have significant impacts that
Construction of a new landfill.
may be sensitive, irreversible and diverse, or
Construction of a new wastewater treatment plant.
A unprecedented.
Port construction
The impacts may affect an area broader that the
New dam construction
sites of facilities subject to the physical works.
The impact on human population or
Rehabilitation of water and sewerage networks.
environmentally important areas is less adverse
Rehabilitation of roads.
B than those of Category A projects.
Rehabilitation of buildings.
The impacts are site specific and few, if any, are
Rehabilitation of existing dam and I&D scheme
irreversible.
C Minimal or no adverse environmental impact Technical Assistance project

The Albania EIA procedures are generally in line with the World Banks EA process, as all projects
require environmental screening and possibly assessment in order to receive an Environmental
Declaration (for construction), and/or an Environmental Permit (for an activity having an impact on the
environment, including some construction activities). Furthermore the type and scale of the impacts the
project will have on the environment determine the procedures that have to be followed and the type of
approval granted. Also all the approvals include conditions that shall be observed by the proposer
including environmental monitoring and mitigation requirements.

The difference lies in the scope of the EIA required for those projects that fall into World Bank Category
A and the Albanian Law on EIA (Appendix II). Some projects (e.g., wastewater management) are
considered as Category A under the World Bank screening, while the same activities/projects under the
Albanian Law will require only a Summary EIA for populations less than 150,000, unless the REA
decides that the project must undergo a thorough or complete EIA.

To streamline the EA screening process for the Project, the approach shown in Table B2 will be adopted
for all projects. It should be particularly noted that projects that are only required to undergo a Summary
EIA under Albanian law, which are considered as Category A by the World Bank, will be subject to a
Profound EIA to satisfy WB requirements.

The Technical design of a sub-project will integrate the findings and comments originating from the EIA
and include recommendations made for the design and the mitigation of the impacts expected, as well as
the conditions of any environmental approval granted.

23
According to MEFWA Guidance No. 3, dated 08/17/2004 On Approval of the List of Business Activities, Application Forms and
Rules and Procedures to Grant Environmental Consent and Authorization from the Regional Environmental Agencies (REA)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

13

Table B2: Screening Criteria for World Bank and Albanian EA procedures
World
Category As Per Albanian Procedure To Be Followed
Bank
Legislation (Meeting both Albanian and World Bank standards)
Category

A Profound EIA and ESMP for the sub-project will be
Appendix 1, Law on EIA
prepared by the proposer.
Example sub-projects:
At least two public consultations24 will be held, one at the
landfill to receive
start of the EIA process and one at the end.
hazardous waste;
MEFWA approval will be obtained and the relevant
landfill to receive at
environmental approval issued25
least 30t of non-hazardous
World Bank will review and provide no-objection to the
waste per day
consultation results, EIA and ESMP.
A
An EIA to WB requirements (enhanced Summary EIA)
Appendix 2, Law on EIA and ESMP for the sub-project will be prepared by the
Example sub-projects: proposer.
wastewater treatment At least two public consultations will be held (as
plant, above).
MEFWA approval will be obtained and the relevant
landfills not included in
environmental approval issued (as above).
Appendix 1
World Bank will review and provide no-objection to the
consultation results and ESMP.
Annex 1 and 2, An ESMP will be prepared by the proposer (to meet
MEFWA Guidance No. 3, dated both Albanian and World Bank requirements).
08/17/200427 One public consultation will be held.
26
Example sub-projects: MEFWA approval of ESMP will be obtained, and the
B
Rehabilitation of relevant environmental approval issued (as above).
existing infrastructure The World Bank will review and provide no-objection
(including dam and I&D to the consultation result and ESMP.
schemes)
Not included in either Appendix EMP only prepared as required by environmental
1 or Appendix 2 of EIA law, conditions and MEFWA requirements.
C
Can be in Annex 1 and 2, MEFWA approval of ESMP will be obtained, and the
MEFWA Guidance No. 3 relevant environmental approval issued (as above).
Strategic Environmental Special legal dispositions regulate the procedures.
Assessment (SEA) (e.g. A positive environmental declaration is required for adoption
N/A development programs on of sector strategies, development action plans, and programs.
transport, energy, tourism,
industry, services, land use, etc.)

World Bank Screening Criteria as written under OP 4.01

Environmental Screening
The Bank undertakes environmental screening of each proposed project to determine the appropriate
extent and type of environmental assessment. The Bank classifies the proposed project into one of four
categories, depending on the type, location, sensitivity, and scale of the project and the nature and
magnitude of its potential environmental impacts.
24
Public Participation Regulations No.1 On Public Participation in the EIA Process, MEFWA, 17/08/2004
25
Environmental Declaration for construction, etc, Environmental Permit, Authorization or Consent for the exercise of any activity
having an impact on the environment (including some forms of construction)
26
In case a Category B sub-project is listed in the EIA Law Appendix 2, the EIA will be prepared in parallel with the EMP to
MEFWA requirements
27
On Approval of the List of Business Activities, Application Forms and Rules and Procedures to Grant Environmental Consent
and Authorization from the Regional Environmental Agencies (REA)

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

14

Category A: A proposed project is classified as Category A if it is likely to have significant adverse

environmental impacts that are sensitive, diverse, or unprecedented. These impacts may affect an area
broader than the sites or facilities subject to physical works. Environmental assessment for a Category A
project examines the project's potential negative and positive environmental impacts, compares them with
those of feasible alternatives (including the "without project" situation), and recommends any measures
needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental
performance. For a Category A project, the borrower is responsible for preparing a report, normally an
EIA (or a suitably comprehensive regional or sectoral environmental assessment) that includes, as
necessary, elements of the other instruments referred to in para. 7.
Category B: A proposed project is classified as Category B if its potential adverse environmental impacts
on human populations or environmentally important areas--including wetlands, forests, grasslands, and
other natural habitats--are less adverse than those of Category A projects. These impacts are site-specific;
few if any of them are irreversible; and in most cases mitigatory measures can be designed more readily
than for Category A projects. The scope of environmental assessment for a Category B project may vary
from project to project, but it is narrower than that of Category A environmental assessment. Like
Category A environmental assessment, it examines the project's potential negative and positive
environmental impacts and recommends any measures needed to prevent, minimize, mitigate, or
compensate for adverse impacts and improve environmental performance. The findings and results of
Category B environmental assessment are described in the project documentation (Project Appraisal
Document and Project Information Document).

Category C: A proposed project is classified as Category C if it is likely to have minimal or no adverse

environmental impacts. Beyond screening, no further environmental assessment action is required for a
Category C project.
Category FI: A proposed project is classified as Category FI if it involves investment of Bank funds
through a financial intermediary, in subprojects that may result in adverse environmental impacts.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

15

15.4 Annex C - Details of Public Consultation and Questionnaires

The public consultation with decision makers and meetings were organized in each of the district areas.
The invitees included farmers, Drainage Boards staff, commune authorities and representatives of
communes, experts on reservoir operation, agricultural experts, etc. In addition at least one representative
of environmental experts group and social experts group of the consultant has participated in such
meetings.

For this project the consultant prepares three types of questionnaires (the questionnaires templates are
attached at the end of this annex). The first questionnaire was one that was filled by consultant in respect
with environmental and social status at the meeting, the second questionnaire for decision makers (who
were represented at meetings), and the third one, for community representatives, stakeholders, interested
parties etc, that will be represented at future project steps and consultations.

Other people that attended included regional environmental experts, water engineers, commune
representatives etc. The consultant group briefly presented the project aim and objectives. The meeting
participants informed the consultant what the local decision makers were expecting from the project
development and the consultant got answers for many questions regarding social and environmental
issues.

The meeting provided satisfactory conversations, and the decision makers and technicians were totally
agreed with the preliminary environmental and social management plans. Between others were discussed
the environmental problems of waters, mostly regarding the Murriz Thana reservoir, the ownerships in
surroundings infrastructure etc. Some of the reservoirs (Belesova) are used by private companies for
energy production (mini hydropower) and some others are in the tendering process (Murriz Thana
reservoir), to be used for hydropower production.

All reservoirs are prone to high sedimentation and their capacity is reduced seriously. In most of the sites
the drinking water is taken from the wells or other natural water sources, and is of satisfactory quality.
Sewage is discharged into tanks (not septic tanks) and small amounts (e.g. at Belesova reservoir), are
flushed and discharged into the reservoir body by rainfall events. In the vicinity of some of them are built
new houses, or restaurants. In all meetings the participants were more interested at immediate project
implementation than on environmental concerns, but they still fully agreed with mitigation and
monitoring processes of environmental elements.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

16

Summarized minutes of meetings with Berat Decision makers

The meeting with Berat Decision makers was organized in 17/05/2012, in the office of General director of
Irrigation Board of Berat Region. The following are given only the questions raised from decision
makers or technical personnel or their suggestions regarding excepted issues by project development. The
list of participants is attached in the end of the report.

Name and Summarized questions Level of

Answers
profession or suggestions acceptance
Is it possible for the remediation
Artur Cepani
of the sites damaged during
Director of irrigation and Yes it is part of the Specific ESMP Very good
construction activity to be
draining board
included in ESMP?
Dashmir Meliku Can the project be implemented Not, sure for the time of project
Good
Board engineer this year? implementation
Will the ESMP consider the The specific ESMP will include at least
Kastriot Lapaj possible damages in the revitalization of all infrastructure Very good
infrastructure (roads etc)? damaged by the project development
The technical engineering team will
decide what will be the revitalization
Ferit Kajo Is it possible to dredge the
steps of the reservoirs. Until now, most
Belesova reservoir reservoirs at the same levels like Good
of the works are focused on dam
technician were planned?
rehabilitation and restoration/opening
of the spillways etc
May the board and commune
representatives, join the
Yes, everyone will support the
consulting team during field
Spartak sinojmeri consulting team visits to the field trip
visits to each reservoir and Very good
Environmental consultant investigation and public consultation
meetings with interested
with community
community and decision
makers?
Are there any planned In general not, but it can be decided
Bledi Memo constructions near the dam or only with appropriate plans prepared
Very good
Socioeconomic consultant close to it that can affect the by engineering team for dam and
project implementation? spillway rehabilitation

Between other communications the Consultant was informed that Slanica, Duhanas and Belesova
reservoirs are not used for fishing. But Belesova is used for energy production. Close to the Slanica
reservoir are built some houses. The community and commune stakeholders and decision makers agreed
to fully operate with the environmental/social consultant. At the end the consultant deliver the
questionnaire, and date to get it already filled on two weeks. The technician suggested to the Consultant
to point out in their report, that all Berat reservoirs are under their capacity, not only by dam damage, but
also by high sediment disposals in reservoir bodies.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

17

Meeting with Decision Makers of Fier Region

The meeting was organized in 16.05.2012 and the participation was a t a satisfactory level. The
Consultant presented the project goal and objectives and than required the support of decision makers for
offering the technical data and facilitate field investigation and public consultation. In the Kurjan, Strum
reservoirs the drinking water is mainly ensured by existing net. Energy supply and water quality has
problems during the winter time. Except for some constructions close to the reservoirs built last times that
are freely discharging their sewage into the reservoir, the others are using tanks. A restaurant is built close
to the reservoir, but for the moment it is not operating. The reservoir is used for fishing by private entities,
that are owned from the site inhabitants. The fishermen are using the fish for food and trade. The Zharrez
reservoir is not used for fishing. No one discussed issues regarding the quality of Zharrez reservoir (i.e.
pollution from oils).

Name and Summarized questions Level of

Answers
profession or suggestions acceptance
Is the consultant considering
Not exactly. The engineering team will
Qazim Shutka that the reservoirs capacity is
clarify any detail on reservoir operations Satisfied
Surveyor reduced, and reservoir
and their revitalization.
operational time is increased?
Increasing of the dam altitude, is not yet
proposed by technical teams, but may
The dredging of the reservoir
cause problems on flooding of lands and
Qazim Shultka looks impossible. Is increasing
other assets in surrounding. In any case, Satisfied
Surveyor the dam height being considered
for each of the steps of reservoir
as an option?
rehabilitation, if possible a mitigation
measure will be used as a response
It can be proposed only in case that the
Xhevair Bregaj Is the project considering the
infrastructure will be affected by project Satisfied
economist/Kurjan remediation of infrastructure?
development
Yes, this is one of the most important
Will consultant consider the
Rrapi Tabaku impacts to be suggested by engineering
enlargement of spillway or their Very good
drainage board team and considered in detail in specific
paving?
ESMP
May the board and commune
representatives, join the
Spartak sinojmeri consulting team during field Yes, everyone will support the consulting
Environmental visits to each reservoir and team visits to the field trip investigation Very good
consultant meetings with interested and public consultation with community
community and decision
makers?
Are there any planned
In general not, but it can be decided only
constructions near the dam or
with appropriate plans prepared by
close to it that can affect the
Bledi Memo engineering team for dam and spillway
project implementation?
Socioeconomic rehabilitation Very good
Do you think the enlargement of
consultant
spillway, upon the projects
Yes, they can affect several constructions
prepared before, affect any
in the village
construction?

In the end the consultant delivered the questionnaires to the participants, and agreed with them to deliver
a copy also at other decision makers that cannot come at the meeting. Both parts agreed to get the filled
questionnaire after two weeks.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

18
The meeting with Decision Makers of Lushnje
The meeting was organized at 17.04.2012, in the office of border Director of Lushnje. The participation
was very good and acceptance excellent. The talks focused around Murriz Thana reservoir. The road that
goes to the dam was in better condition than the roads of other reservoirs considered in this project. In
case of road enlargement the electrical cables can be affected. The reservoir is planned to be used also for
energy production. The reservoir is used also for fishing purposes, that are administrated from two private
entities. One of them is trying to put in operation a fish nursery, about 145m far from the dam. The
sewage is discharged into tanks and drinking water is taken from wells. In the peripheral part of the
reservoirs, downstream of the dam are two houses, and one people from community has fenced 18000m 2
of land in surroundings of the dam. The reservoir suffers from the higher salinity between August to the
October, when the rains falls and Devolli River discharges increase.

Name and Summarized questions Level of

Answers
profession or suggestions acceptance
What is the time frame of the We are not sure, but as soon as to be
Ylli Gjuzi
project and when he can be approved the technical design and Good
Board Director
implemented? defined the implementing agency
Is the consultant considering the
Andrea Vogli OPU It will be considered in detail in specific
future operation of the reservoir as Satisfied
Krutje ESMP
hydropower station?
Can be the water quality a reason
Xhemal Haskaj It will be decided during project steps,
to jeopardize the project Satisfied
OPU Cukas but it doesnt look like that
development?
Does the project consider to
Ferdinand Dervishi It will be seen, but generally it depends
isolate the part where the water is Very Good
Water engineer on the cost
polluted by salinity
Andon Meco Does the project consider
Yes, this is one of the main goal of socio-
Komuna Fier damages in infrastructure by Very Good
economical parts of the study
Shegan project implementation
May the board and commune
representatives, join the
Spartak sinojmeri Yes, everyone will support the consulting
consulting team during field visits
Environmental team visits to the field trip investigation Very Good
to each reservoir and meetings
consultant and public consultation with community
with interested community and
decision makers?
It can be decided only with appropriate
Do you think that construction plans prepared by engineering team for
Bledi Memo
and fenced lands close to the dam dam and spillway rehabilitation.
Socio-economic Very Good
will be affected by constructions They were not sure about the legal status
consultant
and what is their legal status of the constructions and lands

The meeting has really usefull outputs and the outcomes were excellent. In the end of the meeting the
consultant delivered the Decision makers questionnaires, and agreed with decision makers to get it back
already filled on two weeks.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

19
The meeting with Decision Makers of Kora
The meeting with Decision makers in Kora was organized in 22/05/2012, at Irrigation and Drainage
Board offices. The participation was very good, and representatives of communes, drainage boards,
farmers, etc. were present in the meeting. The goal of the meeting was:

Informing the decision makers on expected output of the projects, the importance of environmental
and social impacts, community information etc. Inviting of decision makers to express their demands
and requests during the meeting.
Collection of information on agriculture status in the region, the status of both reservoirs and their
dams, on the irrigation system that are using the waters of such reservoirs etc.
Underlining of the importance of social impacts and needs for compensation for possible negative
effects during construction and/or operation phase.
Asking their opinion on possible institutional strengthening to be provided to irrigation system.

Name and Summarized questions Level of

Answers
profession or suggestions acceptance
The consultant offers existing designs and
What are the details of project expectation on project development, and
Jetnor, Director of
development and what is the time clarify that there are not exact data for its Very good
Drainage Board
expected for implementation implementation, nevertheless is known that
it will be done ASAP
Agreed, but suggested that this part will be
Abdul Dyzho
Needs and solutions for Dam and finalized be engineering team, and social
Drainage Board Very good
system rehabilitation and environmental cost are very important
engineer
on detailed planning and design
Expectation and understanding of
Naum Mujo This ensure a better project implementation
the community is in favourable Very good
Prig Commune and community participation
levels
Needs for support of the drainage
Bardh Qilimi
board and community
environmental Fully agreed on collaboration Very good
representatives on public
consultant
consultation and field surveys
It can be decided only with appropriate
Do you think that construction plans prepared by engineering team for dam
Bledi Memo
and fenced lands close to the dam and spillway rehabilitation.
Socio-economic Very good
will be affected by constructions Their were not sure for the legal status of
consultant
and what is their legal status the constructions and lands

On the end, the consultant delivered the questionnaire and the parties agreed to fill it in and hand it back
within two weeks. At the end the local representatives joined the consultants on a field trip in reservoirs
under the study.

On 23.05.2012, was organized the meeting with Kelti Mano, director of Kora REA. The consultant
informed the director about the project goal, objectives and present status, and the Mr. Mano expressed its
institution interest on collaboration.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

20
The Meeting with Decision Makers in Kukes/Tropoja

The meeting was realized at Drainage Board offices, in date 25/05/2012 and participate the drainage
board authorities and engineers, the representatives of Tropoja, community representatives etc.

Name and Summarized questions Level of

Answers
profession or suggestions acceptance
Bujar Shehu Comments changes on cultivation
As soon as it is possible, the situation
Director of of crops during last year because Good
will be ameliorated
Drainage Board of missing irrigation waters
Emergency needs for irrigation
Appreciation on such support and
Hasan Cuka justify its efforts to fulfil any of
presentation of how the community can Very Good
Fierze commune project demands regarding
be support project development
community and Fierze commune?
The EIA should be finished in three
Qemal Memish
months. Not sure for the other project,
Regional What is the time frame for project
but MAFCP, WB and donators are Very Good
directorate of implementation?
interested that the implementation will be
Agriculture
ASAP
Sure, in all project phases will be needed
the community support. In our phase we
Does the project need the support are constructing the project transparency
Hamit Ferizolli
of Fajza commune for Tregtan and and then we will get useful data from the Very Good
Fajze
Vranisht reservoirs community in relation with their
demands and pretends, issues etc.
regarding the project implementation
Needs for support of the drainage
Bardh Qilimi
board and community
environmental Fully agreed on collaboration Very good
representatives on public
consultant
consultation and field surveys
Do you think the enlargement of In this stage doesnt looks any complains
Bledi Memo the road, using of the space for car or not satisfactory reaction. Everyone is
Socio-economic movement etc, will get constrains interested on irrigation Very good
consultant by community, land owners or
users

In the end, the consultant delivered the questionnaires for decision makers and agreed with participants to
distribute it, fill it in and give back within 2 weeks. After the meeting, the engineers and director, joined
the team on field trip for a general view on reservoirs under the study.

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

21
Annex C-2 Participation meetings in Berat, Fier, Lushnje, Korca and Kukes/Tropoja

Following is the participation list in Berat meeting with decision makers

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

22

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

23

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

24

The following is the participation list in Fier Meeting with decision makers

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

25

Following is the participation in decision makers meeting in Lushnje

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

26

Following is the participation on Decision makers meeting at Korca

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

27

Following is the participation in decision makers meeting in Kukes/Tropoja

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

28
Annex C3- Questionnaires

Questionnaire directed to the meeting

The main part of information is required for 13 reservoirs.

1. For what purposes is used the reservoir (irrigation, fishing etc and how many people/families
or subjects get access on it)
Per cfare qellimesh perdoret rezervuari (ujitje, peshkim etj dhe sa persona/familje apo
subjekte kane akses me te)

2. What kind of activities are developed in surrounding of reservoirs and how far are they from
the dam? Are they damaging the environment or infrastructure and how?
Cfar lloje aktivitetesh zhvillohen ne rrethinat e rezervuareve dhe sa larg jane ato nga
diga? A e demtojne ato mjedisin dhe infrastrukturen dhe nese po si?

3. What are the natural trees covering the surroundings of reservoir and the dam?
Cilat jane bimet natyrore qe mbulojne rrethinat e rezervuareve dhe digen?

4. What are the main wildlife that live in the area? Are they damaging the livestock or gardens and
other agricultural products?
Cilat jane kafshet e egra qe jetojne ne zone? A e demtojne ato blegtorine apo
kopeshtarine, ose produktet e tjera bujqesore?

5. What are the fish types living in the reservoir, and are they used for food or trade? How many
fishermen are operating in the reservoirs?
Cilet jane peshqit qe jetojne ne rezervuare, dhe a perdoren ata si ushqim apo per tregeti?
Sa peshkatare peshkojne ne rezervuare?

6. How is the type and the quality of access between the main road and the road to the dam (road
quality and specifics regarding capacities (how many ways, paved or not etc.). If not road there
is any access to the dam?
Cili eshte lloji dhe cilesia e aksesibilitetit mes rruges kryesore dhe asaj qe te con ne dige
(cilesia e rruges dhe hollesi persa I perket kapacitetit (sa kalimshe, e shtruar apo jo etj.).
Nese nuk ka rruge, ka ndonje akses per ne dige?

7. By what is surrounded the road (sides of the roads, ex. Gardens, houses, pipelines, electric
cables, channels etc.)
Nga cfare jane rrethuar rruget (anet e rruges, p.sh. kopshte, shtepi, linja apo tubacione,
kablle elektrike, kanale etj)?

8. It exists any construction in the dam or in it surroundings that can affect or can be affect by
reconstruction or operation works into the dam or affected by reconstruction works? How
many constructions, their size and use. How far is it? Who own or administrate it?
E ka ndonje ndertim ne dige apo ne rrethinat e saj qe mund te ndikoje apo te ndikohet
nga rikonstruksioni I diges, aktivitetet rindertuese apo funksionimi I saj? Sa ndertime,
permasat dhe perdorimi I tyre. Sa larg eshte nga diga? Kush eshte apronari apo
perdoruesi I tyre?

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

29
9. Where are they taking the drinking water and is that in appropriate quality?
Nga e marrin ujin e pishem dhe a ka ai nje cilesi te pranueshme?

10. Where are discharging the sewages?

Ku I shkarkojne ujrat e zeza?

11. What is the water reservoir sources. There is any pollution source that can affect it?
Nga furnizohet rezervuari dhe a ka burime ndotje ne kanalin furnizues apo rrethina.

12. There is in surroundings but close to dams, places for vehicles manoeuvring, disposal of
construction material, disposal of debris etc? How big is the surface and who own or
administrate it? Is there any access on it and if not, how can be insured the access? What the
owners or administrators pretend or requests to permit the operators use the area for
construction purposes.
A ka ne rrethinat, afer digave, shesh per manovrimin e mjeteve, depozitimin e
materialeve te ndertimit apo mbetjeve te ngurta? Sa e madhe eshte siperfaqjq dhe
prone/perdorim te kujt eshte? A ka ndonje akses me te, dhe nese jo, si mund te
garantohet aksesi? Cfar pretendojne administratoret apo pronaret qe te lejojne
operatoret ta perdorin sheshin per qellimet e ndertimit?

13. Who is the closed village to the Dam? How many inhabitants. Where are employed.
What are the main cultures planted. Data about livestocks et.
Kush eshte fshati me I afert. Sa banore. Ku jane punesuar Cfare kulturash mbjellin. Te
dhena mbi blegtorine.

14. What other villages exploit the reservoir for irrigation purposes?
Cilat fshatra shfrytezojne rezervuarin per ujitje?

15. Where the closed village take the drinking water and when are discharged the sewages.
Ku e merr ujin e pishem dhe ku skarkon ujrat e zeza fshati me I afert me rezervuarin?

16. Where the closed village is taken the energy and is it appropriate for community requirements?
Nga e merr energjine fshati me I afert dhe a eshte I pershtatshem per kerkesat e
komunitetit?

17. In cases of construction or reconstruction of discharging channels, are any family that can be
affected? Why and how?
Ne rastet kur do te ndertohen kanalet e shkarkimit, a ka familje qe preken nga ky
veprim? Si dhe sa?

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

30
Questionnaire for decision makers

Pyetjet Questions
1. Cfare mendoni per situaten e bujqesise ne Shqiperi? Cilat jane problemet kryesore te
komunes/rrethit tuaj?
What do you think of the agricultural situation in Albania? What are the main problems regarding
this municipality?

2. Cilet sektore te bujqesise kane potencialet me te medha per zhvillim ne Shqiperi? Dhe
vecanerisht ne komunen/rrethin tuaj?
What sectors of agriculture do you think have the most potential for development in Albania? And in
this municipality in particular?

3. Cfare potencialesh dhe mangesish kane ndermarrjet dhe inisjativat vendore ne nivelin local
(Infrastruktura, vendndodhja, urbanistika, ndertimet etj?
What potentials and limitations does local entrepreneurship have on the local level (the
infrastructure, the location, urbanism, the construction etc.)? How do you rate the attitude of the
municipality/local authorities towards the agricultural workers?

4. Numri I ndertesave dhe popullsia ne zonen ku do te zhvillohet projekti. Sa vete/familje

jetojne me te ardhurat nga bujqesia?
The number of the settlements, the population on the project location? How many live on
agricultural production?

5. Cilet jane pjesemarresit kryesore (kompanite, kooperativat, shoqatat, strukturat shteterore)

ne fushen e bujqesise ne zonen e projektit?
Who are the key participants (companies, cooperatives, associations, state structures) in the field of
agriculture in this area?

6. A keni dijeni te mjaftueshme per projektin e zhvillimit te ujitjes ne zonen tuaj? Nese po, kush
ju ka informuar apo nga jeni njoftuar? Cfare mendoni per idene kryesore Rritjen e
perfitimit nga produktet bujqesore duke permiresuar manaxhimin dhe modernizimin e
sistemit te ujitjes. Ne cfare niveli ju mendoni se do te kontribuoje ky projekt ne arritjen e
ketij qellimi? Sa real ju duket? Mendoni se ky veprim do te permiresoje prodhimin bujqesor?
Nese jo, pse? Nese po, pse dhe ne cfare menyre (me shume prodhim, rritje e te ardhurave,
rritjen e larmise se kulturave bujqesore, me pak shpenzime per krahe pune? Kush mendoni
se do te ndikohet me Shume? Nese jo, pse?
Do you know much about the Project for irrigation development on this location? If so, who has
informed you, how have you found out? What do you think about the main idea Increase the
profitability and productivity of agriculture by means of the improved management and
modernisation of the irrigation system? To what extent do you think this will contribute to the
achievement of this goal? How realistic is it to expect that? Do you think that this will affect the
agricultural production? If yes, how and in what way (more crops, more income, growing of different
cultures, less expensive work force ....)? Who will be affected the most? If not, why not?

7. Cfar lloj ndikimi do te kete ky project ne bujqesine e komunes apo zonave nen ujitje?
What kind of influence do you think this project will have on the agriculture in this municipality or
area?

8. Cilat do te jene te ardhurat afatshkurtera te projektit?

What are the main shortcomings of the project?

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

31

9. Cfare problemesh mund te gjenerohen nga zbatimi I projektit?

What do you think the main problems could be in carrying out, namely the implementation of this
project?

10. Mendoni se zbatimi I ketij projekti do te shkaktoje problem me pronen? Nese po tek cili?
Mendoni se duhen shpronesuar disa territore per te realizuar projektin? A mendoni se do te
jete I nevojshem per nje rilokim te perkohshem apo perhershem te popullsise per zbatimin e
projektit?
Do you expect that the implementation of this project will lead to legal property problems? If yes,
which ones? Do you think there is a need to expropriate some parts of the land in order to complete
the project? Do you think that there is a need for a possible temporary/permanent relocation of the
population in order to implement the project?

11. Keni ndonje mendim per nje zgjidhje me te mire te problemit te ujitjes ne zonen tuaj?
Do you have a suggestion as to how to solve the irrigation problem on this location in the best
manner?

12. Sipas opinionit tuaj, cfare roli/detyre duhet te kene Shoqatat/kooperativat ne projektin per
zhvillimin e ujitjes?
In your opinion, what kind of role/task should Associations/Cooperatives have in the Project for
irrigation development?

13. Duke marre parasysh gjithshka dini per kete project dhe cfare pritet nga rezultatet e
projektit, cila eshte pritshmeria juaj per efektet e projektit persa I perket punesimit? A prisni
nje rritje te konsiderueshme te punesimit? Ne cfare profili? A ka nevoje per eksperte te ketij
profili? Cfare profili? A ka nevoje per eksperte te profileve te ndryshme dhe duhen zhvilluar
trajnime per to?
Taking into account all that you know about this project and your expectations regarding the
results of the project, what do you expect regarding the effects of this project on employment?
Do you expect a significant number of new jobs? What profile? Is there a need for experts of
certain profiles/employee training?

14. A ka toka te dhena me koncension ne territoret qe perfshihen nga projekti ne fjale per
zhvillimin e ujitjes? Nese po ne cfare masa kompanite koncesionare I plotesojne kriteret e
percaktuara nga marreveshja koncesionare?
Are some companies or entities administrating the lands under considered by irrigation
development project, upon concession agreements? If yes, have they meet the criteria of
required by the concession?

15. Cili eshte bashkepunimi mes kompanive dhe komunes? A kane ato ndonje problem? A prisni
jut e shfaqet ndonje problem? A prisni jut e shfaqet ndonje problem mes tyre gjate zbatimit te
ketij projekti?
What is the cooperation like between the municipality and the companies? Are there any
problems? Do you expect any problems? Do you expect any problems in the implementation of
this project regarding that?

16. Cilat jane marredheniet mes kompanive ne fjale dhe komunitetit? A kane problem mes tyre?
A prisni te lind ndonje problem ne kete drejtim nga zhvillimi I projektit ne fjale?
What is the cooperation like between the companies and the local population? Are there any
problems? Do you expect some problems in the implementation of this project regarding that?

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

32

CEIA
Water Resources and Irrigation Project
Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Resettlement Policy and Baseline Surveys
Environmental and Social Framework Document

33

15.5 Annex D - Further details on Protected Areas

Detailed list of Protected Areas (in Albanian)

CEIA