oe sracenreaMes Using the instantaneous center of rotation method of AISC Manual Part 8, oxe Table 8 With 8 O° to determine the strength of welds on the doubler plate, Fora channel shaped weld on half of the doubler plat, the geometric variables ae: 1 14.0 in, 00 in, 14.0 8. =0.500 = 7.00 i )125(14.0 in.) =1.75 in. 4. SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES say the beatn away fom ‘Bxample 535, this connection uses ASTM AS72 Grade 50 splices {he connection. ASTM A992 W24x 146 beam stubs are used at the beam ends to ect the igh shear demand from the braces over tbe connection. Use ASTM A325-X bots and "Fo ksi weld cleerodes. The applicable building code specifies the use of ASCESEL 7 for ‘alculation of loads. The gravity shears and moments oo the beam ae: Vp=1L2kips —-Vu=8SOKips = Mp-= 120Kip-t “The relevant seismic paramcers are given i the SCBF Design Example Plan and Elevation Mz= 100 kip-t Solutior “This connection design uses splices in the beam to provide a simple bearn-to-columa con- rection satisfying ATSC Seismic Provisions Section F2.GHs) From AISC Manual Tables 2-4 and 2-5, the material properties are as follows: 4 0375 incre B= 36s ‘By iexpolation, AISC Manual Table 8 with 6 = 0" ives: FeaS8 ksi o=335 ASTMAST2 Grade $0 From AISC Monual Table B3, Cj =1.00, The fillet weld size equine is: RED ASD Vim DViee Pmt SCG ata 7 148 kips 2.000116 kis) FHEIHNL00)(A Fm) 35K. 00)(14.0 in) 09 95 (anual Tables 1-1 and 1-13, the geametsic properties are a8 follows: Usea Mein all around fillet weld, as shown in Figure 5-29. All details are shown in Figure em AC Meme Tb $29, Brace (above the beam) H896.875%0.500 : sais Example 5.3.10. SCBF Brace-to-Beam/Column hows 0500 in, ay =OA6Sin, == AR936in? = r= 2.27 Connection Design ‘Brace (below the beam) HSS7.500+0.500 Given: tom=0500 in, tag =ON6Sin, © AR1O3in? r= 2A i. Refer o Joint 7-2 at level 3 in Figure 5-11, Design the connection between traces, beam and colama using splices inthe beam away ft the guset plates. The brace is designed to | Beam : ‘wkle out-of plane. Use ASTM A36 welded gustt plates coocentric tothe braces and 70- weaea ‘cs electrodes to conpect he braces othe guset plates and the gusset plats tothe beam and d=287in h=04iSin, = 0585in ag LOD ‘columa. As designed in Examples 5.3.1, 53:3 and 5.3.5 the braces are ASTM ASCO Grade ' round HSS sections the column is an ASTM A992 W126, andthe beam isan ASTM. eam stb ‘A992 W24x68. The brace reinforcing bars are ASTM AS72 Grae 50 material As ted in. watxta6 uray errno Sas. Cons aac Daur. Se CORERUCTINLv E § | w = ee I S20 [BRACED FRAMES A=830) d= 247 in, t=0650in. y= 1.09 in. Ra = 1.590 T= 204in, y= 301 in Colum wi2xe6 d= 1279, f= 0588050, y= 0800in. Ray = 1.50 in, ‘The compete connection design is shown in Figure 5-33. The connection geometry and ‘member forces areas shown in Figures $-34 and 5-35. These were originally determined in ‘Example $3.5. The caleulations will be shown opain bere. ‘See the discussion under ‘Solutio in Example 5.38 for a discussion of the analysis forces ‘required by the AISC Seiemie Provisions and ofthe LRFD and ASD approaches. {in Example 5.33, there were two braces above the beam and two braces below, so the dinee- tion of loading did not affect the connection design. In this corer connection, sce the ‘aces above and below the beam are not the sane size, the dnetion of loading affects the ‘amount of fore that must be considered in the connection desiga. Two design cases wll be considered, AISC Seismic Provisions Setions F2.3() and F2.3(3) define the to mechanism analyses ‘that mst be considered in determining the required strength of beams, columns and con- nections. AISC Sezmie Provisions Section F2.6e specifies the required strength of racing ‘connections. For the required compressive strength based on buckling limit states, Section 'F2.60(2) has an ational 1.1 factor (relative to the requirements of Section F2.3) applied 1 the required strength of the connection. For this SCBF coaneetion example, the requitements of AISC Seismic Provisions Section ‘F243 willbe used for both LRFD and ASD, except forthe lint state of compression buck ling on the Whitmore section, which will use the 11 factor specified in AISC Seismic Provisions Seaton F262(2). ‘Design Case 1 Design Case I shows brace strengths which corespond to lateral forces applied in the posi- tive raieetion. The brace above the bear is tits expected strength in tension and the brace below the beam is at it expected strength (or its post-bucking strength) in compres- sion. These forces above and below must be considered simultaneously Determine the expected tensile strength of the HSSB.875x0.500 brace ‘above the bearn for Design Case | From AISC Selamic Provisions Table A3.1: yeold Pr ByFrdy =14(42 ts(0.36?) =550 hips Avec SITET oF Sram. Comer 449 SPECIAL-CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES. sr requied strength ‘connect to seine Joading i based on The strength of the bracing connection'dve to scistle bat XSCEISET 7 Section 12-43: Loud Combination 5 (LRFD and ASD) with oO = Ens discussed in AISC Seismic Provisions Section F23. the required strength ofthe bracing connection when the brace is i tension is: Heses7m0500 Fatbee ea (asizGr-20) (es, 5) tasr2 Gr. 0), Ga. 178), Noa: ASG ae oe prelarioned wih pete yg sraces, ig. 5-33, Geomery and completed design for Examgle 3.10. sexe ere or Sn. Constwy t| sae RACED FRAMES TRE SD i [antoee TE | =10(518 hips) =0:7(518kips) i = 518 ps = 363 hips ‘And the expec postuclng bree eng om AISC Site Proven Seton }) moe [oat 205588) =155tip ‘The required strength due to seismic Joading of the bracing consection when the brace is in compression, based on post-buckling strength is: a TD ASD Fa 10B my P= 07E mw a =1.0(155 kips) =0.7(5S hips) a 155 kips =100 Kips 8) eres or oes te conic in Desi Case 1 sawn Figues 3.38 ad A 5.5. Deerminasn of be colertor orc om oie te foe dh al fees inthe team re shown fre bean design in Example 3.5 Pier $17 and 1 NN cesoncorn Dron res hs cep bl et gt tapeciu mac saberucmni renamed i | in compresson, snd te brace below the beam is at its expected suength in tension, These forces must be considered simultaneously. { || Qetermine the excected compressive sraath oF the HSS8.8750.500 4 | brace above the beam for Design Case I! AL _ 10020 90128) a cr umes Ey, ROR | offen BeS r =105 © | we *ean [EZ & | win At cans z 4. SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES = ee (Spec. Ba. 4) (29,000 ksi (ay =n12 ks Fe=h™ ls, i Spee. 132 rae loss a Ay(42 ksi) 241638 capected compressive strength ofthe brace above the eam, bated on AISC Sec Piscine Secon 23 wakes teeter of yA oF 118Fary Paongrsion = 10 {TAF gs Rye} min [144 1.64s(0.36in) 1442 (036 in) = in (48 ips, $80 ips) = 444 ips “The requied strength due to seismic loading ofthe bracing connection when the braces in compression is TRED AD sates 07a = 1.0444 ips) = 0.7(444 kips) wales =311 ips ‘Ate expcted post-tosking rength i 5 03 Penge = 0.3( 44 Kis) =133bps “The required strength de to seismic loading ofthe bracing connection when the brace is im «+ compression, based on post-backling Strength: LRFD ‘ASD 1 = LOE = 0.7E =1.0(138 kis) =0.7(138 bps) 2133 ips = 93.4 Kips pon ETE Sem, COMTI210 RACED FRAMES ‘Determine the expected tensile stranath ofthe HSS7.500%0.500 brace blow the boa for Design Case t From AISC Seismic Provisions Table AS. Rais Poin = RyFyAy = 14(42 (103 in?) 606 kips ‘The required strength of he bracing connection due to seismic loading when the brace iin tension is LRFD ‘ASD =} 45.9 SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES For Design Case IL this shear is: r TRE ASD (4 Kips +606 kps)sin45°= 742 kips | (S11 Kips + 428 Rips)sindS* = 520 Ris £ a 311 hips (conto) (comeression) 4 4808 Po=10E ms Py O.1B ms ! .0(606 kips) += 07(606 kips) 2 | 006 ps 2b ips f | x ‘The two sets of forces to be considered in Design Case TT are shown in Figures 526 std ‘5.37 (also see Figures 5-17 and 5-18 of Example 53.5), ‘There is no shear inthe bear due to scisrmic loads. The required shear strength of the eam. {due to gravity loads is: TRAD 280 LRED Load Combination 5 fom {ASD Load Combination 5 from ASCESET 7 Section 1243.2 [ASCESEI 7 Section 124.32 Vy=(12+02558)¥p + 2oe Ve=(1040.148p5)Mo-+¥ar +03¥; +0.2¥5 r+ 070 Nog =1A(11.2 Kips) +2.0(0 ips) =1.14(11.2 bps) 0 Rips +0 ips +015(8.50 ips) +02(0 kis) +0.7(2.0)(0 bps) =199 bps 128 Kips Main Member Design Considerations Considering Design Cases T and T the total maximum vertical shear isthe sum of the ver- tical components ofthe expected stength of the braces above and below the beam. For Design Case this shear i RED ASD (550 kips-+ 518 kips)sinas*=755 hips | (385 kips+363 kis)sin45°= 529 hips ‘sex er or Se Casa | 19960 sega foyer ame fA) Fae Toe z | tl % z x ; ies tense) {ensen (a) RFD wasp 5:25. Reged engi of bracig conan osoting © "sc Sema Proton Seon F2) for Design Cat I 83.1 kips 93h {eameresson) penne: a = 12.8 Kips f Bi tips oa s sai po (a) ERFD wasp Fig, 5.17, Required strength of bracing connections according 10 ‘AISC Seve Provisions Section F2.%) for Devign Case seo br Sr CoSERUCTONLe | { san ‘BRACED FRAMES Design Case 1 conirus. in the usual compoter cr manval analysis ofthis design problem ‘where all members intersect a a common gravity axis work point, the beam does not pat ‘icipate inthe carrying ofthis shear, and is designed for gravity loads andthe asia oad due to the mechanism analysis required by AISC Seismic Provisions Section F23. In reality, ‘however, the beam participates with the gusset plates asthe principal camer ofthe shear due to the brace force vertical components. The total vertical shear inthis case is 758 hips (LRFD) snd 529 kis (ASD). As 2 “rule of thumb" the beam should be abe to cary one half or more ofthis shear, pls the specified gravity shear, 0 avoid the need for doubler plates. The chosen W24x68 beam, with an aailale shea strength of 295 kipa (LRFD) and 197 hips (ASD) from AISC Manual Table 3.6, will require doubler plates, ‘To avoid the use of doubler plates, use aW24%146, This an increase in weight of (146 Itt = 68 HVT) f) =1,950 16 ‘Alternatively, the beam stub shown in Figure 5-33 can ws te heavier W24%146 section and the eriginal W24x68 can be used between the splices, As yet another possiblity, a con- ‘tinuows plate ean be used in Tew ofthe W244 48 stu, ad the W24x68 can be connected {o this plate. This option i shown in Figure $63 a8 sa illustration, without calculations. The ‘option wsing the W/24146 and the W268 infil piece willbe used here Brace-to-Gusset Connection Design ‘The design approach used here will fellow that of Exarple 5.38, with single pst, field welds between the trace and the goset. The weld length requlred is determined using ‘AISC Monuat Equations 8-2a and 8-2h For the top gusset, the maximum force is $30 kips (LRFD) and 385 kips (ASD), thus RED ASD ph =1.39201 f= osne1 4 wekis(392kpin)OU> 4 welds(0928 pin) DL> P, ad S50 kipe Pe 385 TrelCTI92Apn yA siteents) |!" F weld(OODA Kipn jG Hateent) = 247 in 25.9 ‘Use (4 26in-tong 4, filet welds to connect the brace above the beam othe Bust pine ! For the bottom gosset, the maximum forces 606 kip (LRFD) aod 424 kips (ASD) andthe ‘required weld length is Asan emu cy Sen. Comment ‘59 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES sas LRFD ASD) 4 eli 392)0F> Ry 4 welds(0.928)01> Py 60 kip te 424 kins ‘Fe. 302 kipfin seems) welds(0928 Kiptn A eens) =72in, =286 in, Use (4) 294n-long in fillet welds to connect the brace below the beam to whe gusset plate, Determine the minimum fengin, f, required for the brace-to-gusset lap “The init state of shear ruptre in the brace wall is used 10 dete the inimmam broce- to guset lap length. Not tha the expected brace rupture strength, RF may be use inthe determination of the avalible strength according to the User Note in AISC Seismic Provisions Section A32. Using AISC Specification Section 142, including R; from AISC Seismic Provisions Table ABE Ry = O60 FA (fom Spec: Bq, Md) In this equation, Ay is taken as the cross-sectional area of the four walls of the brace, A= lags Therefore: y= OER Fy (Ss) Solving forthe minimum Isp length, forthe brace above the bea: RED T aD Ro a O.O)R A (Baca) O.GOR Fa (Stace), se 550% 2.00(385 kips) DFRTOSPTSICSE A}HNOAGTIn) | * TAOTTAYER H)(A)(OABSIn) 2atin 29:5i0 "The 26 in. require forthe Yin. let weld controls, ‘Solving forthe minimum lap length, forthe brace below the beam: Avni eran ce Sra ComrmCNONLe sn necepmaie a in mo [ ue | se = TL Eee aie 0.90(36 ksi)(25.8 36 ksi(25.8 in.) | 1 = 0656 <0 in. “The 29 in, length required forthe Yi, filet welds controls, (Check that the bracing connection can accommodate brace buckling according to AISC Seismic Provisions Section F2.6c(3) ‘The requirements of AISC Seisinic Provisions Section F2,6c(3) are met through the use of ‘option (b}—rtation capacity, As explained inthe User Note ofthat section and in the (Commneatary Figure C-F2.9, accommedation of inelastic rotation is accomplished with the brace terminating before the line of restraint, Figures 5-37 and 5-38 show the 21 clearance beyond the end ofthe brace. “The choice of 2 relatively small Whitmore section results in a tapered guset, which i hens ‘ficial because it allows the brace oe located eleser to the beam while stil sceommatng brace rotation by providing a 2k clearance aecoding to AISC Selsmic Provisions Section F2.60(3) and Commentary. ‘Determine gusset plat thickness for the limit stato of tansilo yielding on the Whitmore section ‘To keep the gosets compact, choose an angle ¢, 3s shown in Figure $38, of 20° Example ‘5.3.8 used ¢= 10°, but his example a smaller angle wil result in shorter gusset interfaces and larger welds and may result in concentrated forces that cause yielding or crippling in the beam and column. With 6 = 20%, the gusset thickness can be estimated. For the top brace, the wiith ofthe gusset athe Whitmore section ae + a = 6875 in-+2(260in)(tan 20°) =288i8, ‘Find the minimum gusset plat thickness based onthe limit state of tensile yielting. (Spee. Bq. 140) Asoc srr. Sr ConsrmcTON ‘Use a %incthiek guase pate for the brace above the beam. For the brace below the beaen the width ofthe gusset on the Whitmore section is: Mp Dine +t 2(29.0in Xun 20°) Fig, 5:38. Geometry of pusetw accommodate bending zoe Ausascat hemr o St Cone| sas [BRACED FRAMES. Find the sinimm gusset plate thickness based on the lini tate of tensile yielding, By=FyAy (Spee. Fa. 34-1) Bins TRED ASD ne Fwy Buy 606 hips 69(424 kis) 0506 Ks2h6in) 36 ksi(286 in) | Lose 12 688 in. ‘Use a Yin-thick guset pate forthe brace below the bean, Ta (Check block shear rupture of the gusset plato The aia suength fr the Limit tae of lock sear rps: EP) 0.007 de + UinFidar SOF Ay +h che | (Spee. Ba. 34-5) Forte gusset plate above the beam: Uy=10 Aug = 6.875 in.(% in) 5.16 in? Aer Ane 2(260 in.) in) =390in? i i Since the gross shear tea, Aye andthe net shear area, Am, ze equal in this ese, the shear sy | ‘ieding component, 0.60, i smaller than the shear rupture component, O60FyAm. .0£0(261s)(290in*) wo2) Abucot mun. Sat Conese '53 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES. ea ASD By ODF Ay +UssFa tin (0.600 Ae +UiaFiAw) & “t 15(642 kips+299 bis) _ ED ps +299 ips =AS6 hips >380 Kips 0k 2.00 = STL Kips >385 hips ake Far the gusset plate below she bear: Use=L0 fay =7.50 in, (2 in) 2863 in? Ay = Aa +=2(2900 in) in) 35 in? 0.60F yy = 0.60(36 ki)(43.5 in) = 940 kips Un Fader = 1.0(58 (8.63. 27 ips TRF Hl J DF + Cs $8 0( 0.60754 Us kita) Ae 75(940 kip +327 ips) __ Ripa +327 hip = 950 hips > 606 Ks ook 200 = 64 ips> 424 Kips ok Determine gusset geometry From Figure 5-38, the guseet geometry canbe determined a follows: 1 = yfep and Fastin) (ep asin + (ly 2A tad Lae So tenant lan(U+tes tent Ssind-a-[test +290 festa fane'-0-¥) Awencae ners oF rem. Continosas DBRACED FRAMES Foe the guset above the beam: “The width ofthe gusset edge, ds 2.00 in. wider than the brave diameter to allow clearance ‘between the HSS and the gustet comer, ie, 1.00 in. on each side ofthe HSS: d= 6875 in. +2008, =m" AISC Sesic Provisions Scion 2.6) wie that the bac coaneton secre the Near ce oe tao pond by ace tcking. Tica he ached eer by opm esignng the connection to Brean evalsble eral srength of the xpi re Brace srl segs rip by 1. RFD) ory 1.1 (ASD) or epon Feng non cgay accra the ed rat, This rae cof ‘safes eon (1 a provides ain capac by rogaine 2 oe i tice recommended In AISC Seomie Provions Commexty Section F2.6%3), Uae a ‘%in-ick use plate 2F=204 in) = 150i, uc ese 2.0 tallow for posse ps set ices neeae tte elon prose Wit y= 260n2 4 Soh ¥20a00 8.8 in, 2 =146in. L =Jeindacob uae h aaa (fi2 inean 45 +146 in (singS"Yan 45)f [128 n+ 14.6 in ina =32.1in, Use L= 284 in, -+(2600jn.+ 2.00 in) tan 20°) ASS 124 in (an 457) -635 in =267 in. Use ig =2 8 2% in, Aumont Conse 153 SPECIALCONCENTRICALLY BRACED HAMS. oe conn? fe= (the +29 e004 Lad ep -|(L te +25 £88 i gins) —124 in 2 = GL in + 260 in. 200 in eos 5+ feasin 260120 snr 28 ents-ssi| xta0(90° 45°20") =178in, Use Ly = 1 Shin 1 =atand+2r = 146 in tan) + 2.0 in, =166i0, For the botom gusset: 4 =750in-+200 in. 9.50, a Ae +2e ang 2090.20 }en020 t6ii L = feytan0 + asinB rand}? +(e, +exin6? (fr bin (ian 45%) +160 in sind") an) + [124 in +160 in (sinas")P asin | =235in. Use L- tan =e. (50 in. ee +124 in (tangs")-635 in, 287 in, Use La = 21144 (Ll +2 tactistoanendefint-a font efu weusin ano nominees 252 ant 24a 950 = 5 in. +290 in.+2.00 in Xin, xtan90" 45°20") 2198in, Use La =1 Thin. Ane! error Sr. ConETRITIN. (cost}-635i0|t fy =aun0+2¢ 160 intand5%)+2.00 in. = 180%, "This completes the gusset geometry, ad tbe basic gusset geomety of Figure 533 can be senerated. Top Brace-to-Gusset Connection ‘The design ofthe top brace to-eusset connection in Example 5.3.8 is very similar. The gu set plate thee is 114 in. thick while itis % in. thick here de tothe wider gusset plate wed this example. For the limit sate of tensile rupture of the brace the check io Example 33.8 {i adequate and need not be repeated here. Because the gusset pt is thinner inthis exar- ple, less area is removed from tbe brace to accommodate the gusset plate, (Check the top gusset plate for Buckting on the Wnitmare section Because ihe gusset geometry is different from the gusset in Example 5.3.8, guset plate ‘okling must be investigated, Determine the available compressive strength usiog an effec- lie fength factor, ® = 0.6, fr the extended corner gusset, from Dowswell (2006). As acted in the beginning of Example 52.8, the addiional 1.1 factor specified in AISC Seizmic Provisions Section F2.6e(2) is applied to the expected brace strength for detemiing the ‘required compressive strength bose on buckling iit states. Kis _06(16.6 in.) hina 460) ‘From AISC Manual able 4-22, with KL/r = 460, the available critical stess i 5.9 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES ext “The required compressive strength ofthe gusset plat is TRAD ‘a8 L311 Kips) =342kips S7RKips> 342 hips ok. A = LMS Kips) = 488 bps S61 Kips >488 ips ke Bottom Brace-to-Gusset Connection Chock the brace ettective net eres From AISC Seismic Provisions Section F2.Sb(), the brace effective net arta, Ante) ‘should not be less than the brace gross area, Ay. Thus the net area is Aen tip 2een) ta sing a 499 of Ys in, on each se of the brace sot to allow clearance for erection ‘Ay =10.3 in?-~2)% in.+2( in (0.465 in) =9189 in? om AISC Specification Table D3.1, Case 5 if t= 290 in, > 1.30750 im U= 1.0, thos: 15 ia. =9:9i02 Since Ae-103in? ok, Design welds connecting fat bars to Brace \ “Ascofing 1 AISC Seionc Provision Secon F2 SG), the at bari connected to he | BSS bact to develop te expected strength ofthe lt baron each ide ofthe raced se Son (he eapected yield sens, Ry sed Pee), The ede secon i the length of the HSS ffm the extent ofthe slo mension x of Figure $33) othe stat of the HSS- torput weld The req strength ofthe weld is based he expected ft bar Yield Sebet ung rom AISC Seiane Provition Table 2. fr ASTM AST2 Grade 50 ars For ASD, we 1/3 ofthe expected rng of the Mat ar enforcement. TRAD ASD Ryd =11(608)(228 in) RyFeAgi.5=1.1(804s)(225 in?)5 = 124 ps #25 kipe encase term Stem. Cerrarsou DRACED FRAMES {Using two single pass Vein. fillet welds fom AISC Manual Bxuations weld length required is: 2a and 8.26, the [$3 SPUCIAL CONCENTRICALLY RACED FRAMES ans “The required compressive srengh ofthe gusset plate is: TaD ASD ae % =11618 ip) =1.1663 kip) 130DI> B OSD he 570 tips 399 kips - 3 ee 0 kipe> S70 Kips 0k: ees ie ok Fivels({392 kiplin)(4 steers) | '*~ F weldo(O9D8 Kin (Hace) atti a ‘Connection interface Forces ‘Use @) 11in-long Yin illet welds on each sd ofthe reduced section ofthe brace. “The Uniform Force Method (UFM) reqites that a consrant on the fcsions ofthe fater- Since the gap between the edge of the 114 in.> 1), flat har and he brace i OO in, as shown in Figure $39, ands less than Yin, (see AWS DIL clause $22.1), the Yio fillet ‘welds are adequaie. Note that the flat bor reinforcement needs to extend 1114 in. on each side ‘ofthe end ofthe acta slot, which includes tbe dimension x that may be required fr eecion. (Check the bottom gusset plate for buckiing on the Whitmore section Determine the available compressive strength using an effective length factor, K= 0.6, for the extended corner gusset, trom Dowswvel (2006). As noted in the beginning of Example 58, the additonal 1.1 factor specified in AISC Seismic Provisions Section F2 6(2) is applied to compression backing limit stats, iy _ 06(18.0;in) 7 ¥en, =499 From AISC Manu! Table 4.22, with KL/+ 19.9, the available eal stress: ASD 8D GPa = Gekin de = Fete ee Fel 24,4 4G in(286 in) ieee et tsi( in (286 in) -=405 ips ‘uence erreurs ow San. Conran face cents be satisfied in order to eliminate moments on the gusset-to-beam and _gussct-to-coloin interfaces, My and Mc, respectively, When this consist is not satisfied, nomeals will be introduced on the connection interfaces. This is discessed in Part 13 ofthe ‘RISC Menu, and the terminology used ther is repeated here. Let and PB represent the fistance from the column flange tothe actual ceaioids ofthe gusselto-beam and gussl-10- ‘column connections, respectively. When the eaeulted o> Gof the calculated >. the ‘Nitional shear indvced inthe beam or ccluma due to the momest may add tothe shesr, Yim the bes and inthe column. Thus, for the bear When o> natn enema 26m when a natant jr where ‘Ro team end rsetion 1" mip sn inthe pst where the tp flange of tbe beam connects tothe catama ange For the colin: When B>: eo ste = geste ‘When B199 Kips ak, For gravity pls seismic forces: ‘The majority of the horizontal seismic force is resolved inta the gussets and does not reach the column face. The average gusset-io-beam connection length, from the geometry of Figure 5.33 and subuscting 1 in, forthe snip, (OSi in. 27% in)2=268 in. E Assume for calculation purposes post (26:8 in + 1.00 in./2» 13.9. from the column face, as shown in Figure $42, can be used as a reference point to check the splice under _gavity plus semi loading. ‘The resultant of the heath shear and axil forces an the lot angle fom the horizontal axis ofthe beam, , are found as follows: Asazsca Dern. Sr. Come imo 7 ia 0 = 61.3 kips | 19 kips Ravi ew Wri+ve as = (G07 ipso (099 Kips? eis ipa +128 tp? hoc ana) ame 2156461340) 13809) me Sess ce) Bkips> 128 ips ok { ‘The distance frm the gravity pls seismic resultant force wo the cet ofthe W24x145 basis 4. =30.5in.~189jn.~400 in. = 126i, Use AISC Manual Tae 7-7 withthe angle from the verticct equal to 90" (LRFD) and 90° 341° = 86.6° (ASD). lterpotating from AISC Manual Table 7-7 for angle equal to 7S" wid #3 in, ec 126 in, and n =6: c=805 (a) = 8106(40.9 kips) = 230 kips > 215 ips ok: | Foc the W/24>68 bolts 4 =305 in.—139 in. + 4,00 in, =208 in, =3in e220 Taterpolating fom AISC Manual Table 7? for an angle equal to 75° with ing and = 6: c=658 Avencan berm ce Sex Comsmocnonsae ae 7 = 280 anno ai) = 654(61.3 ips) = 6.54409 kis) 401 Rips > 308 ips ok 267 kips> 215 ips ak, (Check bolt bearing on the W2t 146 and W268 Because the force is erentric and the AISC Manual eocentrcally loaded bolt group tables ‘a use, the Jowestveaout strength of the Bolt sroup shoud be used: in his case, the edge bolt controls. ‘The bearing and tearout strength limit states are separated for clarity in the following. For SCBF systems, were large deformations are asicipated, it is appropriate t assume that deformation atthe balt hole isnot a design consideration for the seismic Ying, and the tearout strength is checked at the end bolt with the 2.00 in. edge distance using AISC Specification Equation 13-60. AISC Seismic Provisions Seetion D2.20) limits the nominal ‘beating strength at bolt hols to 2A; therefore the aysilable beating an tearout strengths forthe W24>148 web see: ia etna = 0.75(2.4)(% in.)(0,650 in.) 2404 in.}(0.650 in 6S ksi) «(65 ksi) i a asta sit ar ana) teste ae = 134 kips> 19,9 kips ok. SRSA Tee7tge> ahs ok Being Onl te beni rp il 9% = 66.5 kipsibolt aH kipsrtote aeioal 7a) Hot into sot pn SOOM iy ‘358 kips>21Skips ok. ‘numa svn or Sm. CenarnvcTN 53 SPECIAL CONCENTIOCALLY KALE FRAMES oe LRFD ASD, “Tear: Gavi “Tearout Gravity | . fe Ade, fre ae ‘ a) ‘= 0:75(1.2)[2.00 in —"4(%e in] = 1.2[2.00 in.—¥%4(%«in)] | (0.650 in (65 ksi) (0.650 in.)(65 ksi)/2.00 = 582 kpaltok = 38 kips/bol 202(38. ips /bol) LIS kips™ 19.9 Kips ok, Akips> 12.8 kip ouk. ‘Tearout: Gravity plus seismic ‘Tearout: Gravity plus seismic ‘% =58.2 hips/bot(1.5/1.2) Fp 8 bipsrbott(1. 5/12) = 723 kip 485 kips/bot ae ae = 8.06(72.8 ipso) *=806(48.5kipsbolt) =587 kips> 308 kips ok. 9391 kips > 215 kips ok, For the W24x68: RD Bearing: Gravity om = 2atr, | = 0.75(2.4)(%4 in.)(0.415 in.) (654s) = 425 Niperote $8 Cor, = 1.56(425 kips/bolt) =1.56(28.3 kipsfbolt) * © 66.3 kips> 19.9 kips ok, =4.1kips > 12.8 kips ok. Asset term or Sr Cnr{ i nee BRACED FRAMES 5:9 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES san URED TRF ‘ASD ‘esring: Gravity plus seismic ry 425 kipsrbott = Crm = 6.54(42.3kips/bot) =278kips<308 hips mg. =6.54(28.3 kipa/bolt) 185 kips<215kips ng, ‘Tearout: Gravity plus seismic “Tearout: Gravity pls seismic dy, = 32 hipsrbok(h 11.2) 15 hips belt $0, = 9.76(465Kips/bat) =4St kips> SOB ips ok 2438 kips/bote(.5/1.2) 31.0 kips/bot Re & =926 0 kips/bot) =303 kips> 215 Rips ook, 'A web doubler can be used to create the W24%68 web thickness, or Jess approximate Analysis ofthe bolt group can be used. Entering Table 7-7 of he AISC Manual st 8 = 75* ‘when the rue angle i 86.3° (LRFD) and 866° (ASD) i very conservative, A computer pro ram based on the instantaneous cester of rotation method of Pat 7 of the AISC Manual Yields a C value equal to 9.76. This vate of C, rather than the value of 6.54 frm AISC Mannel Table 7-7 at 75°, wil be used in subsequent calculations. Ths, the available bear ing and tearout strength ae: RED ASD, Bearing: Gravity plas seismic Bearing: Gravity ps seismic Ry a a-e(3) = 97S) $= Con =9:16(425 bist) AIS ips > 308ips ok ox Teac: Gravity on 91 akaR =0.75(1.2) = 1.2[2.00 in.—"4(!%e im] {2.00 in.—¥4('%e in.) (0.415 in (65 ksi) /2.00 x(0413 n)(654s1) =2458 Kipsbolt 2572 bps ef a= Core a “al (= 1.56(37.2 kips/bolt) = 19.9kips ook. nitesiite oh ‘Avaauc srr Sam. Const Size splice plates ‘Cheoge plates of ASTM AS72 Grade 50 steel and a tual thickness that exceeds the wed thickness ofthe lighter beam. Try (2) Yin-thick plates. The length, is the horizontal dis- tance between the last bolton the W24%68 bearn and the First bolton the W24X146 beara ‘ub, ich 5.00 in ‘Check axial compression of splice plates As the ail force inthe beam de to seismic las is always in compcession, et teason is nota limit sta, With K'= }.2 from AISC Specification Comanentary Table C-A-7.1 ‘HL _12(500 in) mini 884 From AISC Manual Table 4-22 for F = SO ksi, the available erie tress ist RFD SD er =260Ksi Fee 23.948 fa 3 & “The design compressive strength ofthe | The allowable compressive strength of so plas i: the wo pts iss Fad 360 ksi iny(9.0 (2) oF ast 90 30 23.9 si in3(19.0in(2) 513 kips> 307 hips ke wart ie ‘caca brUm Sen. Consecoso E RACED FRAMES Check splice gross section for shear and flexural yialding for gravty-only forces ‘The required sbearsrength due to gravity load only i [RFD “ASD ‘Shear: Va 199 ips Shear: Va= 12.8 ips ‘Moment at cxital section: ‘The critical section is atthe first line of bolisin the W2468 side of the splise:33.0n, fom the column face. Te required moment is: LED ASD My ple = 199 ips(33.0 in.) 2.8 kips(33.0 in) 657 kip, 22 kipsin. From AISC Speciation Equation J43, th avilable shear strength of both splice pate is: RED ASD $= 00605 Ap = 1.00(0.4(90 i) 4050s) i2)(80in2) (19.0 in.)(2) ‘150 428 hipe> 199 Kips alk, 85 kips> 12.8 Kips ok. TaD ASD Ba _ O60F bay Tammany Ou eee eye {190 in.— 6(%ein.+ 4 i.) x04 in)(2)/2.00 90 kips> 12.8 hips ok. 85 kips> 1.9 kips ok From AISC Manual Equation 9-4, the available flexural strength is determined a follows: 2(%4 in)(19.0 in)? + —2(%in}(.0 in) x(lSin+45in.+75i0)(2) =A14in? 2a TRAD ‘ASD Ma = Flan = 0.75(65 es) (47-4 in?) =2,310 Kipin.> 657 =1540 kipin.> 422 kipin, ok rom AISC Specification Section $4.5 and Section FI1, the available flexural strength is: TD aS ee eninnrsoiny | in90% ; masntsoniye | aso nag inline 1 PA08ORipia > 657pin Ok | cso tiin sant tipin, ok. (Check splice net section for shear and flexural nipture for gravty-only forces From AISC Speefeaion Equation 14-4, the wvailable shear strength is: Anse Tass oF Sa Consrnvcnn {Gheck splice for shear and flekual yielsing for gravity and seismic forces ‘Tere isso sheasin he splice dve 10 sels loads, From previous calculations, for gravity loading, the available shea strength is s follows: TRAD asp Ry =A28 hips >199 Rips ok. ‘Moment at erica seton: ‘The critical section i a the frst ine of bots in the W24%8 side ofthe splices 19.1 a.m the gravity plu seismic sesultant force. The required moment at the cial section is: _Aumago sri or Sa Corery BRACED FRAMES RED asp My yee =19.9 bps(19.1 in.) = 380 kipin, pice = 128 bips( 19.10.) = 246 kip. From previous calculations, dhe available flexural strength is: RED ASD ‘ B | gap soonipin. on.| M2-2.0s0bipin.> 244 tipin alk Check splice net section for sheer and flexural rupture for gravity 90 seismic forces bo RFD aS J Ry =285 kips> 199kips ok. FE =100kips> 12.8 Kips ok fii=2310tpin> tpi, o| Matson s2tuen ok ‘53 SPECIAL CONCHNTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES 5268 From AISC Manual Table7-7 for angle = 0° with $= 3 in. andn= 6: C=M2in ‘The nominal flexural stengih of the bolt group is: ue (Manual Eq, 10-4) Maas = FMC) 8 aoa? 5/001 245421) =2.460 kipin, = (2.460 kin) * 50 isi (19.0' =0818 in Since 21 204 in.) = 0.750 in. Lips ok, Anca sree or Sam. Comal wae RACED FRAMES (Check the available compressive sength ofthe beam stub, Treating the beam stub as. cone necting element, determine whether the available compressive strength ean be determined sing AISC Specification Section 34.4 XL_ 1.0(30 in) 7 301in 997-25; terfore,AISC Speciation Soto 1. appiable B-Fite 50 1 (190 2) 2,150 Kips (Spec. Ea, 14.6) ‘The available compressive strength ss ERED ‘ASD = OF Ay =090(2150 is) =.940kips>50.0kips ak a” 167 =1200kips>41.1kips ok. Design of beam stub web-to-column wold ‘The resultant force tobe resisted by the weld is: TaD a5 Reali nalieMt = eating COE (Gor ipa oC ea 35 kips = 307 kips ‘The angle of the resultant force can be calculated snd uted ia the directional strength increase of fillet welds according 10 AISC Specification Equation 12-8. The angle of the ‘resultant with respect to the vertical along the column ist ERED 8D [Me Oe tn (3) om (2) scat 2 wt tps 308 ps 70" a0 ‘Asmasca mTe cr Srem. Come 4.3 SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY HACKED FRAMES a ‘The directional strength increas i calculated as follows: RED ‘ASD 10+ 05sia!$1.79%= 1.02 1.04 0.Ssin!*7.70°= 1.02 The required weld size is caleulated as follows fom AISC Manual Equations $-2a and 52: TRED ‘ASD j eS 435 ‘sie 307 Kips 1 Prat F(r SoD pin (2004 mycin) | 20928 Kirin (20% in. )H.02) = 7.82 sixteenths | = 738 sinters ‘sin, double-sided fillet welds are required for Design Case I on the beam T-dstance ol iin, “The normal force of $9.0 kis (LRFD) or 41.1 ips (ASD) onthe column indicates that web local eripling and local yielding checks should be mae on the eolamn as fellows, Check column web local yielding From AISC Specification Equation J10-2, because the lad is applied greater thon d fom th: nd ofthe columa, the available web lea yielding suength ofthe column is TRED SD ($8 = Fp Skis 8) | eet | -=1.00(50k8)(0550 in) sree x<{5(150 i.) +20% in} »|5(1.50 in) +20% | =77 ps>S80kips ok eae Ripe 4LLkipe ok (Check column web focal erioping From AISC Specification Equation J10-4, because the load is applied greater than d/2 fron the end of the column, the availble web local crippling strength of the eatummn i: Asencio Sven: Coneraverentsam = 934 kips> 59.0 kips ok. 623 kips> 41.1 Kips ok, ‘The Tmt stave of column web compression buckling isnot checked here Becase only the beam stub web i atached to the column flange. Therefore, pinching ofthe column ved ‘would not occur, sit would ifthe bear stub Manges were also comiccted. ‘Beam-to-Column interface—Design Case it ‘The forces atthe beam-o-column interfce, shown in Figures S-A1a and S41b, are: TED ASD ‘Nommal Normal: ‘Mu =|98.6 kips—128 kips46.0 ps) | Na =[69.1ips—322 Kips 49.4 Kips] = 7544 kips (compression) = 52.5 hips (compression) Shear Yp=193 Kips +250 kips +19.9 kips 5 kips +175 kips +128 hips 463 Kips 23 hips ‘Check beam stub for shear and tension yielding ‘The available shear yielding strength determined previously for Design Cas is: LRRD ‘ASD V, <482 Kips 463 Kips ok Fe asaitips<323 ips mg. Asencio OF Stan. Conran {9 9c. concorecaliy mean NS so ia oie tet nd cons or LED em ASD, a i rpc btn sn ASD wae en este Tp oe aye 3 tod oud he nds coely apt nee Sgn Fr he oncom oft) Se-omslsfafe tact heals Oc URED ev bcd ee 7 . ‘The available compressive strength determined previously for Design Case 1 is: x Pte <=E(2) te me a LRFD ASD =0:75(0:80)(0.550 in,)* =080(0.550 in)? ‘ bess 5) ? i $%,=1,940 kips> 754 kips ok = 1,290 kips> $2.5 ips, osk. afros( 204 (0.550 in. afte (0.350 in 127i soo ian oso CORTE] |, RATAOTATRIOR) best of ba sb web-tocotsn wad co 1550 “The resultant forces the beamn-to-colunn interface is TRFD ASD, | R= VGN = (403 Kips) + (75.4 Kips)? [(323 kips)* +(52.5 kipa) 69 ips = 327 Kips “The beam stb web-o-column weld sizes determined from AISC Manual Equations 8-24 and 8.26, inchoding the diectional suengih increase of AISC Specification Equation 12S, ‘follows: Directional strength inrease 10+ 05sia!$925%% 1.03 ‘Asauoat Sema oF Sam. Cerro$20 snaceD means iD L 70 [Number of sixteenths inch of weld [Number of siteenths inch of weld required sequied a nope Ss sar kips Peed” 571 3o2 Rin) 20% myc) |" ~3[O HER pin Ya inO3) 788 sien 8.24 sineonte [Note tha this Case controls (Design Case) requiring double-sided Ye in filet welds ‘The coluran must aso be checked for web loal crippling and web local yielding. These limit states will net contrl here for Design Case I. The calcaations were showa for Design Case ‘Top Gusset-to-Beam Interface—Design Case | ‘The frees atthe top gusset tosbeam interface, shown in Figures S40 and 5-40, snes ‘ASD ‘Normal: Ne = 167 kips Shear: Va 187 kips (Check top gusset for shear yielding and tension yielding afong the beam flange ‘The availble shear yielding strength of the gusset plate is determined fiom AISC Specification Eqvation 14-3, and the available tensile yielding strength is determined from AISC Specification Equstion J4-1 as fllows: RFD ‘ASD eo thahte % thie aaa '=1.00(0.60)(36 ksi(% in.) = 0.60(36 isi) (26% in 1.00 in) (04 in) (264 in. —1.00 in) = 417 Kips > 267 Kips ok »G/.50) = 218 bigs 187 Kipa” ok OP = OFA e sg = 0.90(36 ksi)(36 in.) = SEKI in)Q6%H in.—1.00 in.) 167 iy. = 416 kips> 167 Kips ok, ‘Asuausot ermine er Sa, Comer ‘53 SPECLAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES. =| Althougl it seldom conta, interaction can be checked here using the interaction for of Frample 53.8. Design of beam flange-to-fop gusset weld ‘The beam Mlangeortop gusset plate weld iy determined as follows using the direction strength inrease of AISC Specification Equation 12-5, the 1.25 ductiliy factor discussed [ATSC Manual Part 13, and AISC Manual Equations 8-28 and 82b: a an Tomiie ies nn SFE ne WERE 2358 hips =251 kips re 6 =un| (* =e ce ‘Directional strength increase \ 1.0+0.50sin'$ 41.7° 21.27 1.0+0.50sin!*41,8°=1.27 Dope 1250358) \ | ean 225281) 2(1.392 kipfin,) 2(0.928 kipfin.) 1 1 i ‘DoH a100 im) “Bien = 492 sitcoms =5.17 dixteenths ‘Ute double sided Yin. fillet welds. ‘The 1.25 fctor in he numerator is a ductility fetor from the work of Richand (1986) rdifed by Hewitt and Thornton (2004). Richard found that the ratio of the muximurs ‘ress to the average sires on comer gusiets was 1.4, which was reduced to a 90% con dence limit by Hewitt and Thornton resing in the 1.25 factor. The UFM sssumes ‘uniform distribution of sess on the gusset edge, but the actual distribution is not likely be uniform; the 1.25 factor accounts for this. ‘Aosoucay Instore Sr Consmecreneas oe sina Ks ama bln aise baa Ca ee see, aan od ik ‘From AISC Specification Equation 310-3, because the load is applied less than or equal to ff th Deam.stuh depth fom the end af te Beam sb, the sve mab local yielding i Stength ofthe beam stub i: ASD ‘Normal N= 135 hips Va 151 kips = = ‘Shear: Vj= 151 Kip Fonte (25k) | Hey = Fate 2 Shes +a) 2 Check top gusset gross section for shear and tension yeizing “i = 1.00(50 is}(0650 in) =s01si(0680%) From Design Cas #| i25(1.59 58) ae ws 4 ee >x{25(1.59 in) +(26% in -1.00in)] |+(26% jn, ~1.00 in) x(1/1.50) a = ; = 966 kips>238 ips ok = 644 kips> 167 kips ok. 17 Kips> 216 ips alk. =0.60(36 ksi) | (4 in.) (26% in-=1.00 in) heck web local crippiing x50) ‘Because the compressive force is applied at the centroid of the bean stb to-gusset inter face, which is a distance from the beam siub end that ie grester than 4/2, the nominal web local crippling stzeagth is: =278kipe> 1ST Kips ook: the = 054, sake (e) | Ez = 09002618) n) Re = 0.8045 \e] Ste (Spec. Ba, 1104) (26% in ~L00 in) 26 kips> 193 kips ok, 416 kipe> 135 Rips ak, ‘The available web foal crippling reg is: er. Beam flange-to-iop gusset weld ‘The beam fange-o-top gusset place Held is detemined as follows using the dizetionst strength increase of AISC Specification Equation J2-S, the 1.25 ductility factor discussed ia ‘Ry =0.75(0.80)(0.650 in}? | AISC Manat Pat 13, and AISC Manual Equations 8-2 ane 8-2 s| | ¢ - ho i ,| de TaD a0 7 ye 1880 ; oe aa =a | pena) aaa Rea ViGaNt Ra WTNt 0.650, = (216 kips)+(193 Kips? <= {U5 Kips)? +(135 Kips tae ae aoe. al Ear y \§ ) = 2.00, = 643 kipe> 167 kips ok i Poe eo Sram CensucTON Avge bors Se Coser1.0+050sin!*.41.8" = 2 isco means ED ASD asd angle Load ange a ¢ 9 o-i(%] © tn (3 qi nf 85 ip Beis iSiips ans" aur Diectional steagh inerease Direetonl argh increase 1.040085 41,8127 ‘59 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES se) Top Gusset-to-Colurmn Iaterface—Design Case | ‘The forces at the top gusset-to-column interface, shown in Figures $-40a and S-40b, are: | i 7D 1 Normal: Vz =85.5kips | 106 Kips Moment: Mac 157 Kip | ‘Normal My = 122 Kips ‘heat: Ve 51 kips Sheae: Ve Moment: Mae = 195 Kip-in. Combine the axial force andthe moment by converting the moment nto a equivalent axis force derived from the moment equation fora simply supported member with a concenrate load at midspan ( isthe saip dimension ofthe gusset and Bis the distance to the centro 3.98 sixteen =4.18sistconths requiring Yin fillet weld. Beam stub strength Check beam stub web local yeiding roi Design Case T calculation: ‘This requires double-sided Ye‘, fillet welds. Note that Design Case T contrcls, however, TRE ASD Re =966 ips> 193 Kips ok, Facies 135k ak Daja= 1250250808) _ 1.25(203 kis) ‘of the column-to-gusset connection, detennined previously): 2(1392 pf.) 2(0.928 tin) Saal % 1 ERP | ‘Bein “Loom (26% in. —1.00%0,).27) ‘ia | psx 2037 Kipin) Sie s asia -100 | 18 bips | _ 295 kipin) 3.450, —1.00 in “This ig not a real Jod but results in the same demand oa ibe gusset and weld as working ‘with ¥ and Mg separately and allows th diet use of AISC Specification Section 110. h Design of column flange-to-top gusset weld oe er sees ooleha a aaa pena reese ee cee | een cmetareers (Check bear stub wat focal criping From Design Case T calculation: TRD ASD 9 =965 kips> 193 kips ok, AS hip > 13S kips ok. ‘Asani sw oF Sem. Coerc LRED ASD or | Resaant se Resultant foe A R= Waw R= Peas [G51 kips)*+ (068 Kips = (C06 Kips +08 ies)? ¢ = 226 ips 59 kgs | Aten suo SEs. Const |I Use a double-sided Yin, fillet weld {Check top gusset for shear yielding and tension yielding along the column flange ‘The available shear yielding stengih of the guset pate atthe column Mange interface is etermined from AISC Specifcarion Equation 143, ard the availble tensile yielding strength atthe cokimn flange interface is detemined from AISC Specification Equation Het as follows: = TED a0 Ya = POOF Ae ae = 1.00(080}(6 4) in) (160(36 ks) in Xin. —1.00 in) (17% in. ~1.00 in.) ~ 10 = 279 ipso SLs oe 12 ips 106ips alk 16% =O Ay a = 09003648) in) (ITA in =1.00 in) 10> 168 ips ok =213 kips S118 kips ook ‘Anca es a San. ConsrmeTCn | SSPECINL-CONCNTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES sas) ia ro Check colin web focal iktng From AISC Speciation uation 310-2 bea the lai pid eater than tect Load angle Load ange tron deph ds fom he nd fhe clube value wb eal ing stengh of he e aoe) e eae See cD A am ie oe fute uae ae $= Fe te(Shay 9) PatetShue tht : =100,s01050in) ~oonstasons meee etn sists) + 7H —160%)] {5(1.50 in) +(274 ta. ~1.00 in} Los ososa!S4.1°=132 10+-0soin!*481"=192 = 670 Kp 168 pe 6k inti aya = ——125(226%08) 1251159) 447 kips> Bigs ake = E309 pin) Pua’ —0.928 pin) 1 Check cokenn web loca eipplng G7Hin 100m j0.39) ‘Because the las applied pene than dom he end ofthe clu. the walle web =456 sects local cxipping strength of the columan is determined from AISC Specfcurion Equation S104 as follows: (shel Fwome fee] Pee Pela) $n = 908002] =0:75(0:80)(0550 in)? =0:80(0.580 in}? 1 4 3f!7in= 1.005.) 327m =L00im) 7 in. 12Tin | w aeer esate? | 0300 in. (0.900. eo RTOS a) F360 Ws Ka] BOO 0.550 ‘0350 in =812kips>168kipp ok, Check column web shear strengt rom AISC Manso! Table 3-6, fora W126, the available shear stecgth is: Asan oun or Sa, Comornscron08 InACED FRAMES ‘53 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES 29 TR ASD TREO a8 z ve BBA (Ve =210 Kips 122 ips ok. ee tworips>8sstips ok 9h. ~ OF Ae ea =0090(36 bs)(% in) ‘op Gusset-to-Column Interface — Design Case ! ‘The forces atthe top gsset-to-Columm interface, sown in Figures Sls and 5-41b, ate: RED Normal: Ny = 98.6 kips Shear: Vy = 122 ips Moment: My = 158 kipin, Moment: Mye= 111 kip Comparing these Jos with those of Design Case J it an be seen that Design Case T controls. ‘This completes the top gutset design. Bottom Gusset-to-Beam Interface—Design Caso | ‘The forces at the bottom gusset-to-beam interface, shown in Figures 5-400 and $-40b, sre: RD ASD. ‘Normal: N= 213 Kips Shear: Vy = 256 Kips ‘Nocmal Ny= 130 Kips ‘Shear: Vy= 180 kips Check bottom gusset fr shear and tension ye along the Beem Dange ‘The available shed yielding strength of the gusset plate is determined from AISC Specification Equation 14-3, and the avilable tensile yielding strength is determined {fom AISC Speciation Equation 14-1 a flows: rr) ASD Ye = 0.60 Age ee += 1,.00(0,60)(26 ksi) (4 in) = 0.60136 bs) x02 in-1001n) (4 in)(28% in.— 1.00 ind) = 450 kips>256kips ok. fo) 2300 kips> 180 kips ok Associ srr oe Sra Cone 36s in) in 1.00) (29% in=100n) Se =674 kips> 213 ips ack, = 49 kipe> 150 kips ack, Design of beam flange-to-bottom gusset weld ‘The beam Mlange-to-botiom gusset plate weld is determined as follows using the directional streagh increase of AISC Specification Equation J-S he 1.25 ductility factor discussed in AISC Manual Pat 13, and AISC Manual Equations 8-2a and 8-20: LRED ASD ‘Resultant force Resultant oad Relient RON ((ie0 ps? +150 ips 9234 Kips Load angle (Gee) wor Disetional strength increase 19+0.50sin!*398°=126 Directional strength increase 104+0.0sin'*39:8° 25(333 hips) e__1.25(234 bps) rat 301392 kin.) Prov (0.528 Kiplin) Se an rina (Gi ia Loo )28) '=451 sinteenthe = 4.28 sictees double-sided "ici. fillet weld. Dekign Case Ll must also be investigated, Aoaacat renner Sra CoenBoam stub strength (Chock beam stub web focal yielding Because the normal fore acts at the centroid of we bottom gusset-o- beam interface, which ‘sles than the depth of tbe bear stb, d, the avaiable web local yielding strength of the beam stb is determined from AISC Specfcaron Equation 110-3 a8 flaws: TRED ‘ASD 59 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY RRACED FRAMES 538 Bottom Gussat-to-Beam Intertace—Design Case i ‘The forces a the bottom gusset-to-beam interface, shown in Figures 5-t1a and 5-41, are RD ASD Nonal: N,=250 kips Shear: V,= 300 Kips Normal: Ny= 175 kips| Shear: Vy=210-kips Ra _ Fintnl? Skies +44) 2 a =50si(0650 in) >(25(1.59 in) (284 in. 1.00 in) (us0) 657 kigs> 150 Kips ok, Ft(2Shan +) 00(50 ksi(0650 in) x(2.5(1.59 in) (28% jn.—1.00 in} 1080 kips>213 ips ok ‘Check beam stub web local crippling ‘The normal force acts at the centroid of the botibm gusse-to-beatn interface, which is greater ham d/2 fm the ed of the beam. The avalable web Jeal exipping sength of the ‘beam stub is determined from AISC Specification Equation 10-4 ASD petal Peel Re -qnosod =080(0650 in? 284 in 1.00 in ofa | y s{assoim)* ; 109 in. PEE RER SERRE) 0.50 in. 0.680 in, 1,010 kips> 213 ps ok. 434) 200) 673 Kips> 150 kips ok. ‘Azan hmv or Sram. Conrnvet (Check bottom gusset for shear and tension yielding along the beam flange rem previous calculations for Design Case TRAD ASD | bh ok Fea t0 ips> 17S kips ok | & Ya—s00 kipe> 210 kips alk ok, | Besooxip>2i0 nis | Beam lenge-to-botiom gusset weld ‘The beamn flange to-bostom gusset plate welds determined a follows using the directional strength increase of AISC Speciftcarion Equation J2-5 the 1.25 ductility factor disessed in AISC Manual Pat 13, nd AISC Manual Equtions 8.22 and 8-20: TAD ASD } Renan free «| Resta ore i RaVeeeE , Rn MEANT ! (aon wip (50 ins” omer mee | ane Paks | Load angle Load angle { -(™ i oom ft) | =o ie 210 Kips { <8 Ave KasmRU oF Seas. ConcLe | 30 smaceo Frans 5.SMECLAL COSCHATRUCALLY BRACED FRAMES su LRFD ASD ‘LRFD t ‘Diectonal gi ncreate Diesinel et lcease c 3 oeaiet 1.0+0.50i!939.°=1.26 10+0Sosn'5398°=1.26 36-9) Dare = —!25(391 age 1280s 10 sp 280 wen) '4= 311.392 Kiplin) 2(0.928 kip/in.) wel 1 1 * Gin 10 mae) * Gini Lom jL36) =512snieenths +5226 sixtenths ‘Use a double sided 2+. fillet wel. Design Case If contol Check beam stub web local yilsing ‘The available web local yielding suength of the beam is (rom previous calculations: TERED ‘ASD (421,030 kips> 250 Kips otk, Check beam stub web local crippling ‘Toe available web local crippling stength of the beam is (rom previous calculations): TRED ‘ASD (Ry = 1010 kips>250 hips ode 673kips> 17S kips ook. Bottom Gusset-to-Column Interface—Design Case | ‘The forces atthe botiom gusset-o-column interface, shown in Figues $-40a and 5-40b, are: [RFD ‘ASD ‘Normal: = 109 kips| Normal: N= 766 ips ‘Sheet: Vy = 152kips Shear: Vas 107 kips Moment: Mae 180 kipsin, ‘Moment: Mae = 126 kipin, Combine the axial fore and the moment by converting the momeat into an equivalent axial force derived from the moment equation For simply supported member witha concentrated lead at ridspan (isthe sip dimension of the gusset and fs the distance tothe centroid ofthe column-to-gusset connection, determined previously): ‘Asoc bree or $ret Conver Column fange-to-bottom gusset plate weld The coluran fange-t-bottom gusset pte weld is determined as follows using the diceo- tional strength increase of AISC Specfcarion Equation J2-5, the 1.28 ductility factor iscussed in AISC Maral Part 13, and AISC Manu! Equstons 8-2 and 8-2b RED SD Resukant ores Ran WE + Nico = ttn TE Resultant force RoW + Naegte = (QUOT eis + (08 pe)? 211s = ps fading Load ge = ant ee ° he arf 783 wo fit isa , os Ho sass" Dieton eveaghicmate 1.04.0.50sin'* 44.0" = 1,29 4.25(211 2(1.392 kipvin) iny(29) Use a double-sided Mein fillet weld. Design Case I must also be investigated Avoca em or Sri Consmcnoni S26 RACED PRADEs Check bottom gusset plate for shear and tensile yielding ‘along the column flange ‘The avilable shear yielding strength ofthe gusset plate a the cohumi Mange interface is \etermined fiom AISC Specification Equation J4-3, and the available tensile yielding strength atthe column Aange interface is determined from AISC Specification Equation J4- 1 as follows: RED nee Shear Steve: 9% = 60 doe ‘er = 1.00(0.60)(36 ksi) (%4 in) =0160(364s3) (19% in.~1.00 in.) (4 in (19% in.—1.0 in.) =306kips>1s2hips ak x0ns0) =204kips> 107 Kips ok: Normal: Normal: hae Fae 4 a" a i ing 3685(% in)(19Hn.—.00 in) x(19%in--1.00 in) - 16 459 kips> 147 kips od = 30S kips>103kips sks ‘5.3 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES 5.265 ‘Check column web local crippling Because the normal force is applied at a distance from the column end that is greater that for equal fo d/2, the avilable web local crippling strength of the colusin fiom AISC Specfcaion Equation 310 is hey fee] = PE 75(0.80)(0:550 in)? =0.80(0.550 in}? 19%in 1.00 Oa * is »(oaey | *oso0%e ir oR, = 908073 & ~os0a] S7Skips> M7 Kips ok, =583 kips> 103 Kips od Check colurnn web local yielding Because the normal force is applied at a distance from the column end that is grester than, ccegual tothe column dep, , te available web local yielding strength ofthe colurnn fom, AISC Specification Equation 110-2 is: TRAD oa Ra PE Sh +) a ae += 1.00(50 4i)(0550 in.) +=504si(0550 in) »{S(150 in) +(19% in —1.0 n)j x{S(150 in. +(19% in. —1.00 in.) 725 kips> M7 Kips ok. x(L.30) =484 kips> 103 ips ok, Avena isms or Sram: Caner Check colurnn web shear strength From AISC Manual Table +6, the available shear strength of the W126 column is: TRE ASD (M=210 Kips > 109 ips ok 40 ips> 766 Kips ok a Bottom Gusset to Column Interfsee—Decign Case I “The forces atthe bottom gosset-to-columm interface, shown in Figure S-4la and Sl, ae: RFD aD, ‘Nowmal: y= 128 ips Normal Na = 894 Kips Shear: Va 178 hips Shear: Va 125 kips Momt: Me = 21 pin. Moment: Mac = 148 kip-in. | Assencan aero or Se. Conner5.266 BRACE mRAMES ‘Similar to previous calculations, the axial force and moment are combined by converting the ‘moment into an equivilent axial force: ‘$3 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES 5287 (Check bottom gusset shear and tensio yielding along the column flange From previous calculations for Design Case I the available shear yielding and available ten- Sie yielding rengths ofthe bottom gusset ae: 172 ips = 121 hips ‘Design of column flange-to-bottorn gusset wald ‘The column flange-to-bottom gusset plate Weld is determined as follows using the direc tional strength increase of AISC Specification Equation J2-5, the 1.25 ductility factor siscussed in AISC Manual Pat 13, and AISC Manual Equations §-2a and 8-26: ‘ASD TRF 280 Tai ASD tite Necgiv = Nat: ee 8-5) Shear: ‘Shear: #128 ki + 2H in) 99.4 pay 2038 Min) %.=06ii>176ups ak | Menai ipe> 28h oe 0Si=100%m ToSin =i Normal: $%5 =459 kips> 172 kips ok, 305 kips> 121 kips ok, (Check colurnn web local yielding From previous calculations for Design Case I, the avalable column web local yielding strength is Resultant force Bax WE +NBega = (asia = 7s hips) +172 Ripe Us is 1s Lead ange Lend angle . =e ora tn 2728 (12 ian asi a0" 44" Directo sengh nee reson strength nese 1.0+0.50sin' 44.0°=1.29 1.0¥0.S0sin'5 44.1°=1.29 Drgpa=———_125(248 Kies) 41.25(178 Kips) Bes 73(1392 Kiplin) 2(0.928 Kiplin) eee Genes (9H in Lovina) (9% ia 00a) 54.57 sinteenths 481 steers LRED ASD qn=raipeiniis ok | Reattoniem ok (Check column web local crippling From previous calculations for Design Case I, the avilable column web Iocal crippling strength is: om = qeanttigotie ak | Resmtestaine ak ‘Check column web shear strength From previous calculations for Design Case I, the avaiable shear strength ofthe W12x86 ‘column i: TRAD ‘ASD eanoueestanie ok [Eamia> wane on Use a double sided Yen. illet weld. -Avamca neni or Sr. Conercron Avec oreo Sa ComsBCTONa ‘ i son [BRACE FRAMES The complete design is shows in Figure $33, Alternate Detail Using a Continous Gusset Plata An alternate detail using a continicus gusset plate instead of a beam stub is shown in Figure 5-43. This altemate uses a Yin-thick gusset plate with plate reinforcement in lien of the W24%146 beam stb aod eliminates many welts. Note that the horizontal dimen- sion 2c is used to set the gusset horizontal dimension. HSS 50750800 tae PL" (9p) A98) wats Fig, 543. Alienate design sing continu gusset plate ‘Aancay beers cr Sram. Conrcrn {3 SPECIAL CONCENTHICALLY BRACED FRAMES 20 Example 5.3.11. SCBF Brace-to-Beam/Column. Connection Design with Elliptical Clearance and Fixed Beam-to-Column Connection Given: Refer wo Joint J7-1 at he third level in Figure $-44 (the plans given in Figure $10). Design the connection between brace, bean and column. Use an ASTM A36 welded gusset pate concentric tothe braces and 70-ksi electrodes to connect the brace to the gusset plete and ‘he guset plate tothe beam and column, Use ASTM AST2 Grade 50 contimty plats. The tae isan ASTMAS0O Grade B round HSS, the beam is an ASTM A092 W24x68, and the ‘column isa W12596. The applicable building code specifies the use of ASCEISEL7 for ea culation of Joads, The gravity shear forces atthe end of the beam are: Vo= 4:50 kips Ve =300 ipssm InRACED FRAMES “This example ists aa aleraive netboa for gusset pte design to that provided in the AISC Seis Provisions Commentary Figure C-F29, proposed by Lehman eta (2008, to accommo race king at required by-AISC Selon Provisions Seti F2.6(3)In lieu ofthe 2 liner brace oft, am 8p elliptical offic may be wsed. In pate ‘cul, for rectangular guset pats, he fy eliptical oft offers a moce compact gusset pate With equivaleatdefomsation capacity to accommodate the ot of plane bace move- met. However, or gust plates that have sgnfieant tape, a is the casei Example 53.10, the 8% elliptical offset and the linear offset offer smite results. This example, 235 shown in Figure 5-45, illustrates a conection design using the ellipical eer methoo fappbed to a rectanglar gust plate. 1m aio to Mustang the pplication of the eliptical clearance methodology, this exarn- pl uses a fixed beam-to-columnn connection to satisfy the requirements of item (b) of AISC Seisnic Provisions Section F2 6h nthe design, the beam web and flanges are Welded o the column flange with CIP groove welds. The ange weld requires 2 substantial corner clip in the gusset plate for acess. Tis clip is detailed as 1.5 in. fn this example, the clip is con- sidered for rupture limit states, bt its ignored for yielding int ses. ‘Some features of dis example, including ihe elliptical clearance, te fixed bess o-colwasn ‘connection, andthe siing of welds atthe gusset plate interfaces ae provided as n aterna- tive to Example 5.3.10. The brace-t-gusset ealelations are sot shown in this example because they are simi ro Example 53.10, 4 < i Ke vss sars0st0 ce 09 in| arf. nee "erection bolt eux cane asr2ce so er. Bom sides of web at beam yan) toe | “S abe en iF vey ,< comay muerte ofA E LY | Pas cotimn ‘Welds of wb and soublrishear pl 16 cota Hage ar dernand ica. Fig. 5-45. Rectangular guset plate wth 8 elptical brace ofiet addressed Bsample 5.11 Asmat ermm ce Set Conse 3 SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY BRACE FRAMES sm Solution: ‘From AISC Manual Tables 24 and 2S and AISC Seismic Provisions Table A3.1, the mate- tial properties area follows: ASTNLAST2 Grade 50 A= 50k Fix 65ks ASTM AS00 Gnide B 58h R=14 Rad ASTM A992 Fy=S0ksi F,= 65k From AISC Menuet Table 1-, the geomet properties are a fellows Brace (above the beam) HSS 6.875:0.500 fom =0500in. te =O46Sin A. Brace (below the beam) HSS 7.50:0.00 fom = 0500 in, 36in? r= 2.27in, tay=0465 in A= 103in2 r= 2.49 in, Besta wesxea d=27ia, feaOsISin y= 8.97 in, aa L080. Colma Wi26 a2 127i. ten 0550in, = y= 122i y= 0.900in. kag = 150i, For the HSS6.875:0.500 brace above the beam ‘According to AISC Seismic Provisions Section F234) the amplified seismic lod is dtes- tnined from the expected stengihs ofthe brace in compression and in tensioa, The expected tensile strength ofthe brace is determine as follows. Asc sre of S,COMSTRUETINN: i \ san [BRACED FRAMES From AISC Seine Proviion Seton P23 and Table A.A: Ratt ain Byte =14(4245(0.36 2) = 550 Kips ‘53 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES son The expected compressive strength of the bac is: Pema =P = L14(s1 6 si)(936: 444 ips ‘The required compressive strength due to seismic losing is: ‘The required temilesirength due to seismic loading is: 1D ASD ASD Fy=10E ne y= OTE gp 244 kips =07(449 kips) Ean =3ULkips =0.7(580 kips) = 285 kips ‘The expected strength of the brace in compression (using = 12 #) a its post-buckling ‘The expected stength of the brace in compression (using the brace) is determined as follows: = 12 ft a the actual length of. 1.00020 £02 ins) =64 E an f= Veg 105 Be fE win M4 FE 7 NE eR a & : 14G2 is) (Spec. Ea. BB) _ 2.00 (GaP nasi release, vias loca #23" ayansy caista (from Spee: Eq. E52) ‘Avance of Sem. Consrnvcrt seni i © 3Penpaion =03( 4 hips) 2153 hips ‘The required compresive stent based on post bucking strength is: RED ASD he 1 OE r= OTE = 133 ps =0.1133 hips) = 93. hips For the H87:500:0.500 brace bel the beam. ‘The connection ofthe brace below the beams not dsgned a pt of his example for Jit JT, bat the brace member size is important when considering the analysis provisions of ASC Seianfe Prostons Section F23- The expected sueagh of the Brice in tension is dtemined a follows From AISC Seiomic Provisons Table A3.1 Bald Prason = RyFidy =1.4(424si)(10.3 in?) = 606 Kips ruses sre oF Sra. Consrmcnonsam RACED FRAMES 13 SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES a ‘The required enilesuength de oselamicloding is: TD ASD | ine 7a | a=10 Aa ' onl Em Fn OTE = 518 kips = 071518 bps) | aah = 0.26606 kips) ~aee | | 424 kips “The expected stengih ofthe brace in compresion (wing £2 12 ft at is post buckling ‘The expected strength of the brace in compression (ving EL _1.0(12.0 (12 inst) 7 Zain 18 E [29,000 Fa - “eR ary ae = 105 2 fis determined as follows: ei (Spec. Fg, E34) (from Spec. Eq. E3-2) sca) saloese 755 [1.442 si) = 441 bs Te expected compeive strength of te bce ew beam is Fain = Tioty =1.14(44.14)(103:n?) =518 pe Te requ compeive stone it Avec Eso or Sm. Comercio strength is: | 03Pmprson = 0:3(518 kips) \ 155 bps ‘The required compressive strength based on post-buckling strength is: | TD SD 1 7a | = 0.7055 kips) | =109 ips b “The brace-to-gusset conection and brace reinforcement will nt be addressed inthis exam- Asin Example 5.10, the brace to-gsset weld wil bein. ilet wel at a6 26 Jong. For reference, the fil design using these ethodeloges i shown in Figure $48, The sym- ‘ols used are shown ia Figure 5-46, | Gusset Plate Design ‘The geometry ofthe gusset plate and cation of the end ofthe brace are established using ‘he approach descrited in Lehman eta (2008). The calculations for the brace connetio are shown inthe following, The horizontal gusset dimension, a, has been chosen 1840 in snd the vertical dimension is calculated. These values result i an econornicl gusset plate thickness and weld sizes. The value of ais hase on iterations using the method outlined | [Lehman et al. and allows fora brace to-guset weld length of 26 in. From he geometry ia Figure 5.46 and based 0 the cic f= 0 in, the pst ent slog te eal Dg | b= (are)tany—e, = [40 in. +4127 in)ftan 45*—14(23.7 in) ~3Sin | ‘Where b is the vertical gusset dimension, y= 45" is the angle between the brace and the bor- izoatal as shown in Figure 5-46 and determined from the elevation geometry in Figure 5+ nd ec and ey me he ecetiten ofthe enc edge fom the corn eam See) lines, respectively (that is, half the member depth). Asana breve Ste. ConsTaUCTION |7 S218 BRACED FRAMES “Halfof the leszihs ofthe major and minor axis ofthe clips are then cleulated using »gus- set plat thickness of 9 in bse on yielding on the Whitmore section. (Check required gusset plate thickness based on the limit stato of tensile yeloing ‘Tension yieling is checked on a section ofthe gusset plate commonly referred to as the ‘Whitmore section. This section is explained in AISC Manual Part 9 (Figure 91) aed in ‘Tromson and Lini (2011), The width ofthe Whitmore section is determined based on a 30° spread p= 230° Die $2126 in Ktan30°)4 6.875 in. =369 in, From AISC Specification Equation 14-1, the swale tensile yielding strength is: f th a | | I | | Ly lg. 5:46, Marion of eymbol uted for lengths end angles. ‘Auanc sr ce Smt. Conran ‘5.3 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES, sm TRED ‘ASD (8 = OFA RA aa Sting this equal othe required tensile | Setting this equal tothe required tensile strength ofthe brace connection, nd with | stength ofthe brace conection, and with Ag= pip te guset plate thicksess is: | Ay = fp the gusser plate thickness is: igo Fp 580 kips {79036 kS)369 i) 0.460 in. “Try a ein-thick gusset plate, ‘This calculation does not inchude any reduetion considering thatthe Whitmore wid extends into the web of the column or besa. Ifthe Whitmore wid enters into a beain er column web thats sobstanaly thinner than the gusset, there is a potential for web local vielding. nthe configuration selected, the Whitmore width doesnot intrude ino the beam or column ‘web, This can be demonstrated by a goometric evaluation. Determine gaomatry ofthe gusset plate “The determination ofthe Location ofthe end of the brace. as determined inthe following, ‘nated on the methodology described in Lekman el. (2008); he equations in the folowing age pated fom te reference. Te location may also be determined frm Korubka (2007). Note that the determination ef the fail dimensions of the gusset rlate based on eihse method is iterative. _Aseaca Teri. of Sra. ConsrncrineACED PRAMS _350in, 25ia. =119 ‘The dimension ¥ defines the y-cocntinate of the ntecsection of the brace axis with the ellipse: ye -s500 feat? 45° + (1.19)? =25in, ‘The x-cooninate ofthe ellipse is then found fom: a =380 x ‘To ensure thatthe entre brace cros section remains clear of the elliptical zone, the brace is shited from the x and y’ coordinates using the correction factor, Cor, calculated in the following: =226in, corn "8-9 tee tan(90"-35.3°- 45,05) we ‘Asmoncan born. Se. Comer In the preceding equation, Diyace/2 is expressed a8 ¢ in Lehman et al (2008), nod is defioed as the distance from the brace centoidal axis to the extreme fiber ofthe brace (DIZ this case. “The maximum distance from the theoretical gusset comer to the end of the brace is P= (eP +0 -Corr = (G26 my 2SinF ~0.588 in, =313 in, “The bace length overapping the gusset plate must then be checked 1o ensure hat there is adequate length fo he requted weld: Pre ere ke 6575 in, =313 $1.00 i =269 in. ‘wbere sis the “shoulder” ofthe gusset atthe brace as shown in Figures $-48 and 5-46 ‘This is reste than the 26 in. required forthe Vin, fillet welds (determined in Example $3.10). Therefore, the geometry of the pxset plate is now set. I were less than 26 i., thea the gusset plat height and width would have to be increased. “The thickness of the gusset plate was tematvely assumed tobe in. and needs to be veri= fie forthe limit states of block shear rupre and compression buckling. ‘Check compression buckling on the Whitmore section ‘Te ini stato compesion brig tcked wing AISCSpeaton Sexton A First determine KL/r as follows. “The length ofthe brace centerline from the thooretical gusset camer to the intersection with the beam Mange is caleuated as: Sin sind? =488i0. "The centerline length of buckling, fis: aak- = 488 in.-313in =175i0. Asanacat becom cn Stem Comreic TOso The ratios of gyration ofthe gute psi “Ti a Te =0150n ‘The elipscal clearance provided in this example results in an extended comer gusset pate, ‘therefore, frm Dowswell (2006), use K=05, L_06073ia) 0.80%, =583 Prom AISC Manual Tile 4-22 with F,=36.ksi and XE — 55.3 RFD ‘ASD ‘53 SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY RACED FRAMES san (Check block shear riptue of the gusset plate Ke =.DFsAe +UnFihs £0.60 Frye + UiFidae (Spec. By. 185) cane the gros shea ta wand the net sear ae, Ay, ar ual inthis ea he shear yielding component, O.60Fyp, governs ove the shear uptre component, GDF Re = O60, Oily +UsFDosrty = 0.5036 Ks(2)260 iat + 1.0158 LSNS7S inp 1,820 kipfia(1,) TRF ASD z (Ro wipe) S50 ips 51520 kit) 2, = er = 27.1 esi 18.0 ksi a AISC Seismic Provision Sections F230) snd F2.3(i) define the two mechanism analyses that must be considered in determining te required strength of connections. AISC Seismic Provisions Section F2.6 specifies the required stength of bracing connections, in particu- lat, For the requved compressive strength, Section F2.6c(2) has an ational 1.1 factor (Gelatve tothe requiremets of Section F2.3) applied to the required strength of the con- nection. The requirements of AISC Seismic Provisions Section F2.3 will be used for both [ERED and ASD, excep for the limit state of compression buckling on the Whitmore see- tion, which will we the I. factor speifed in AISC Seismic Provisions Section F2.60(2), ‘Therefore, the required compressive szength of the bracing connection is based on the expected compressive stength ofthe trace du to seismic lading as determined previously, with the 1.1 factor applied, From AISC Specification Equation E3-1, te avaiable compres- sive strength atthe Whitmore section, based on flexural buckliog is: TRAD A = thoy = 274 bsi(369 n(n) =625 hips = 180 si(369 in in) COSKips> 1.1 (444 Rips) = 488 Kips ok] =A15 Kips ANS hips > Lt (311 kipe)=342 Kips ook, ‘Therefore, the Yrin-thick gusset plat is aceptable, _Asencat borer Sra. Craerncenon Use a Sin-thick gusset plate, Gusset Analysis Im order to peform the gusset plate checks ot vertical and horizontal sections atthe inter- faces withthe beam and column and to peeform checks of local limit states within the beam and column, itis necessry to obtain design fores by performing an analysis ofthe gusset. ‘Porth design method iste in this exp the checks of he gusset plate at these Ver~ eal and bozo section wl ecestarily he satisfied ap a consequence of sting the check of yielding ofthe Whitmore section and of designing the fet welds atthe pusset- team and gusset column sterfaces to H suonger than the gusset plate, Nevertheless, ii necessary derive the freon these iris in order wo obtain Fores for ihe web local $ieldng sd web lca criping checks onthe team and clus {tn this example, the Parallel Force Method (also known asthe Ricker methed) will be used for simplicity (Thorton, 1991). Note: Aematively, tbe Uniform Force Method is also applicable 19 this connection. ‘Because of the proportioning ofthe gusset plat in this example the Uniform Force Method ‘wil reslt in moments being assigned tothe vertical and horizontal itefaces. The forces ‘sed to evalate the limit states of web local yielding and web local erippling would then be sudjusted to include these moments as iustrated in Example 5.310. ‘The Parallel Force Method has a disadvantage relative tothe Uniform Force Meth in that ‘minor norments result atthe column face. However, the use of a rigid beam-o-caluma con- nection is generally sufficient to resist such moments and they may be disregarded under these conditions. Asetca bearer Se. CensrRUCTONIn the Parallel Foree Method, eccentricities are caleulated from the brace centerline 1 te centroids ofthe gusset plate welds atthe beam and column faces. The gussetto-beam con nection is designed forthe required shear force, Hy, andthe required normal force, Vs, The jussetto-colamn connection is designed for the required shear fore, Vo and te requted normal force, He. As shown in Figure $-47, a line perpendicular 1 the brace axis which asses through tbe centroid of the gusst-o-column ange interface may be used to ind the ‘cecentrcity (Thief also done forthe pusset-to-beam flange interface) As discussed previ- ‘ously total gusset lengths are used for evaluating yielding Himit states; local effects due 10 ‘the comer clip are considered only for rupture limit tates. ‘Atte column flange, the gusset-o-column flange centroid i located at this point, relative to the Working point: fae zak a hres tae (635 in, 29.1 im) ‘The point om the brace centerine that isthe intersection of line throagh this point perpen dicular to tbe brace centerline is given by these equations (as shown in Figuce 5-47), with the working point taken asthe origin: + | . | Y Fis, 547. Geometric method of establishing eccentricity from brace centerline, ‘Asner re ConsicNEN amnansscl SSYRLUAL LUNCHARIUALLE pacer Manse tan? y+ ) “The ecentricity between the centroid ofthe gusset-to-column iterfuce and the brace cen- tele is therefore: ; cea Vite) (3 [arrin Ean TTA in 16.1, Atte beam Mange, the gussétto-beam flange centok ‘working point: is located at this point, relative fo the 8. on)=(4-3.4] ae: (264, 1.918) “The point on the brace centrtne that ithe ietsection ofa line through this point perpea- Aula to the brace centerline is given By these equations (see Figure $-17, relative tothe working point ca alte tant y+t (ands). 9 in +264 i, Gand A =192in. va=(107) x0 (ant5°)192i8 192. “The eccentciy between the cei f the suse t-beam interface andthe cent of te bei therefor: Asmat emnrers or Sen. ConeraveTO8ae mace reanas on ca—a) 100m) [92 in 26a ia +92 =103in ‘Tkiag moments sboat point (39), the diagonal force, parallel tothe brace fore, a the 19 in 1 src CONCITIOCALLY RACED AMES ex TR Sy Ree ing he esa) Tere) (650 nips) (6. in) __ (985 ps6 in) (161 in +1033) ‘colin Msnge comesponng 1 the expected strength ofthe brace in esion ais hes TRFD aSD : ‘The comespondng shear onthe beam faces: =f he aft “Cere) (eta) URED nat (930 kips)(10:3 in.) _ (285 ips) (10.3 in) Ha =Recosy Hay = Pascosy (6. +103 (61in. +1033 in) Tass kieteeels) = 235 bipleos 45") 215 bps =150 ips cas gs = 166 kips Note that summing moments desribed wil result a P force inthe opposite direction ‘ign Slr a bee tae tothe cohuma Mange force as shown in Figure 5-47, Because Figure S17 ot actually 2 fre-boay diagram ofthe gusset, forces Pe abd Pyar shown a they act n the beam and col 780 umn. When reclving these forces ino components, frees denoted HS in he orients ‘Seton and forces V sti the vertical dretion, Depending on whether the intrfice isa Va=Pasiny team ora colons, 1 or Vinigh be cher a sear ce «noma force. =255 kipesings*) ‘The coespondng shear on the colon fee is =166 kis ‘Taking moments about point (x,y) the diagonal force at the beam Mange coresponding to the expected strength ofthe brace in tension is Axx erro ov Sve. Consmenin eee ASD “The beamn-to-column connection is designed for a moment based on the nonnal and shear MeSaefatahca ae tng mene ow or sock pan Beto rere san taeet ‘moment at the beam-to-column connection due to the brace force is: 215 Kips(sin4S*) = 150 kips(sin 45°) tthe tae ia 0 corresponding normal force onthe column face is (do) ves (} | vas (2) = cae seal) v5) wer|nal) val = 2st a = pres) porun( 3) iehasay taba ‘ : (it (toa: =aisiptest) aeyeveeey Lai 22 ce 220 ae sient = 1,930 kip-in, = 1,350 kip “The heriaontal force tthe conection ofthe beam o the column is affected by beth the force catering the frame (dtined by the mechanism aaalyis provisions of AISC Seismic ‘Provolns Section F23) andthe hosaoetl force transfered (rom the gusset tothe column Ghee Hag), The tual force entering the frame can be computed based on the diference {ettecn the tral expected frame shea strength above and below the beam, as explained poacher cr Sram. ConseExample 535. These shear strengths are calculated based on the horizontal components of the brace expected strengths. The total force entering the frame isthe difference hetwen the expected strengths ofthe braces above the third level and the braces below the third level: [ZcBrace expected strengths below beam}cosy | 7.*| src expected strengths above beam)eor| S38 SPRLIALCOMNHRICALLY ORAL ED PANIED TRED cc secu = YAGA3 Kips) =222 bps Ha, cotesor = 4191.9 Kips) = 460 ips “The force atthe beam-to-columa connection within the frame must also nclode Hac (LRFD) Sitar to wit was iastated in Example $3.5, the mechanism analysis with the com- ‘pression braces at their post buckling strengths wil ot result ina higher force entering the Frame inthis case, Since the braced frame isin the mide bay of a thee-bay building, the collector force (half ‘ofthis story free) can be considered to exter the braced frame fro each side These forces are showa in Figures 48a and 5b, 3 TaD S| Samccaspe ccaas|(00¥PS+S18 ips) 3 ro ae Cae ne Hiroe = Hy ctr + Fa Hanan = Hare =91.9 ips ‘ HG por ips 222 eps 6 pe =138 ps =198 kips “This force may be resisted inthe beam Mange-t-colunn welds, the beara web-to-columa swcld, of shared between the tw. In this example the available strength ofthe flanges wil be calculated, and any excess demand willbe assigned tothe web. For this comparison the required strength of each beam flange i taken as ‘ig, 58a, Collector an frame forces forthe think level (LRED). ‘Asecit hereon ce Se Connor ig, 5-48 Collector nd frame forces forthe think level (ASD) rscaca amt Sa. CONETRUETICN} 5-208 ERED ‘ASD Row Me, Hsormren 59 SPECIAL CONCENTIICALLY BRACED FRAMES 5297 ‘The suess from the vou Mises interseton is compared to the strength ofthe gusset plate, which i taken a8 6F, (LRFD) and F,/0 (ASD) for the lint state of tensile yielding from AISC Specification Equation Het, ‘The available stength af each beam flange forthe limit state of tensile yielding is ealeue lated ase ya Maes = 1930 kipin | 198 ips __1350 kip-in, 138 kips poo “Z7in-os8sin 2 “BT in 0585-2 = 182 kips =127 kips eats S224 ksi> Misi ok, ‘A similar cheek for rapare on tis plane is made, considering the 1YSin. comer eli RRA, (Spee Ba. st) =a Bbyty, Se 508.97 in. O.585 in) Ha Py Sef 262 kips tpl ~clip)} tp(b—el ml ASD aot cl riajes4 sin ~T2) rs 3 sa pasaetinca 5 etkee OA asia 236 Kips>1S2kips ok, 1ST Rips> 127 ips ok, Bo ese | ‘Thus the entre force can be assigned o the beam flanges, and none need be assigned to the ‘beam web inthis ease. Gusset Plate at Column Flange ‘The combined effets of shear and tension atthe gusset-o-columnn iaterface may be cal- cvlated using voo Mises interaction (as shown ip terms of streses in AISC Manual Equation 9-1); TRAD ro a af Ye ‘b} 7 | ie) ta oft reece 132 (Hin}(o45 ia] =Miks 2983 ksi Ave smu cr Soe Conernucros 147 ist 103% ‘The stress from the von Mises interaction is compared tothe strength ofthe gusset plat, hich is taken as 9F, (LRFD) and Fy/& (ASD) forthe init state of tensile rupture, from AISC Specification Equation 14-2. Gusset Plate at Bsem Flange Similar fo the gusset atthe column face, the combined effects of shear and tension oi t= ‘gusset a the beam Mange may be calculated using von Mies interaction: Aaya Ds OF Se, CosmicS290 [BRACED FRAMES '53 SPECIAL. CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES 501 237kips ae _ [mio] 2 a al sf tenee—f (% in.}(40.0 in) (% in.}(4000 in.) =190kS Hic =1S2Kips OK | 773 kins > He 106 kips ok. Check eolumn web local erpping Fora fore applied greater than a distance of d/2 from the member end: betel s(eesinye " 12.7 in. )L0.900 in, (SO (0.900 (05350 i, 1,820 ips j “This valu is not compared to the valve of Hyco Hye calculated previously, whichis based ‘on tension in the brace, as crippling is a compression limit sae. Because the Hye 1nd Hac foxces calculated previously ere directly proportional tothe brace force, they can be scaled down base on the ratio ofthe brace fore in compression tothe brace force in tension. The ‘maximum compression farce atthe gussct-to-clumn interface is [EF te n=0ane (Spee. Bg 10-4 = (0.80)(0.580 in}? won Column Web at Gusset-to-Column interface ‘At the gusset-o-column interface an gusset to-beam interface, the column and beam webs, ‘respectively, must be checked fo the limit states of web local yielding sad web local ery piling. The length of bearing, /, is taken a5 the eight of the gusset plate, ‘Check column web focal yielding Fora force applied at distance less than the depth of the member from the member end, tbe aailable web local yielding stength i determined as follows: R= Fat (Ska +) = (50 ksi(0.550ing[5(1.50 in}+345 in] = 1.160 kps (Spec. Ba, 10-2) Asc erm Sn. Conse Therefore: ‘Ry = 0:750,820 bps) =1370 kips> 123 hips ok. Beam Web at Gusset-io-Beam Interface ‘Check beam web local yielding ‘Consider that the interface force, Vp, aets at he centroid ofthe gusset-to-beam interface, a Gistance of a/2 = 40.0 in/2= 20.0 in, from the fe ofthe column. ‘Aswan Ineerurzce Sen COnSTHUCION be aracen reameay Forages pte ian he depth the men om thal engh seemed lie ee Ree fel Shi +) (Spe.8a. N03 = (50)(0:415 in. 2.5(1.09 in) + 40.0 in] | = 807g 1 TRAD a0 ‘= 1.0857 bps) he 7 hips> Vis =237bipe 0s ® O% | sol tips is =166 ips ok, Check beam web local crippling ‘The resultant fore atthe centroid ofthe guseetso-beam interface seto-beam interface i greater than d/2 from the member end, Thus, AISC Speejteation Equation 510-4 is spplicable, somal (PE {eisralessey| 237 in NOS8S in, SemaERPTT Ry ‘ais: (Spee: Eq. 110-4) = (800415 i = 793 hips This value is not compared tothe valve of Vn OV ; , sof Vos calculated previously, which is based 6 tension nthe brace, as crpplig is a compression limit state. Compression inthe beam orcs when the brace i i compeession, not when itis tension, 30 new Vas hd Vex Avancis bears ce Ste Conroe: JF sea. concmicani once eas en into 70 (Ry = 0.75(793 kips) & ey coe SBSH! Hot aks =397 Kips> D4 ips ok. interface Weds Based on experiments nd simulations, Rode tal 2011) ecommend designing the welds atthe gusctiobeam and gussctooinn interfaces for he expected tensile strength of the gusset platen cert increase the deformation and utility capacity of the system and lima the weld damage. The recommended expression for he sizeof par of ilet weds, ‘where isthe Weld sine and the 1.5 represents the dicetienal strength increase for tant versely loaded it welds is 21.5)9(0.60) Fax (0.70762 Ry Fly where B = 0.7. tn order to comply withthe AISC Specification, use >= 0.75 instead of 075. ‘This expression, which is based on AISC Specification Equations 324 and 32-5, may be ‘rearranged to solve forthe Gllet weld sie, forthe given material strengths (the required strength for ASD is taken to be RyF/.5). From AISC Seismic Provisions Table A3.1, for ASTM A plate msteral, y= 1.3, 1D ‘ASD . ts we a , "°° |5G3} 910.60) Fe (0.707) 20 S)T3N(0.60) Fi (0.707)|"* i (1336 i) -|__eomasycersy *[2(439(0.75)0.60)(70 ksioao7 21S 5)(0.60) 70 s)(0.707)|” =0700%, =0700i, For the #inthick gusset plate the weld size required w=0,700(% in) $0.38 in ‘Use Vein filet weld on both sides ofthe gusset plate to connect the gust to the beam, snd coum. Beam-to-Cotima Connection ‘The beamo-aluma connection st comply with the requirements of AISC Sedsmis Provisions Section F2.6b, Foe this example, Section F2.6b(b), he moment-resisting bess: end connection option, is chosen. This example utilizes a moment conection with CF Aoeouca TE oF Sem. Covia oo nace Rana {pone nel ofthe ean Manges and bo he col fang, which wil be dea resist « moment conponding tothe execied beam earl sengt upd by 1. (LRFD) or 1713 (ASD), hereby meting AISC Seione Prisons Section F2 S400) ‘An alternative method of providing a moment connection a the beam-to-column connection. and meeting AISC Slate Prvistons Seton 2.6), which excl considers fra retina forces, peered in Example $3.12. A connection ith smpe te t-col- tm. consection meting AISC Seiomic Provision Secon F26Hs) was presented in Example 5.3.10. Any of these approaches is satisfactory. ‘Use CIP groove welds atthe beam flanges 4-column and beam web-lo-column connections ‘To determine whether continuity plates are required, check wheter the Timi states of wel local yielding, web loca ripping. and flange local bending of the column are adequate for the reqired strength. The required strength must be determined. AISC Seismic Provisions ‘Section F2.6b(6) requires that tbe conection be Uesigned wo resist a moment equal 10 the ‘expected beam flexural strength meltpied by 1,1 (LRFD) or 1.1/1.5 (ASD). In this case, the beam web has 2 CIP groove weld othe columa flange and therefore can develop the full expected flexural strength ofthe beam web. Therefore, fer the local cokin init states ‘of web local yieing and web loal crippling, the demand athe column face will be taken asthe expected, strain-handened strength ofthe beam Mange using a sran-handening fac: tor of Lt: {9 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES aaa ‘Check web local enppling ofthe column For a force applied greater than a distance of d/2 from the member end, the avalible web | toca eoppling strength of he column is determine as follows, where the length of bearing, | ‘is taken as the beam flange thickness recom] |F (sre. 108) | -soyasso yf fossa) 12.7, A900 [coin eso aOR 0550, = 297 ips TR 48D 397 hy (9Ry = 0.751397 kins) oe =298 ips 317 Kips mg. =199 Kips <212 Kips ng RED 280, Bena = TRF Apage Re jonge= (11/13) RFyApige =110.)0 1) =(14/15)1.1)50 ks) (8.97 in)(0585 in) (897 in (0585 in) 17 Rips 2212 Kips (Check web local yiektng of the conn Foca fore applied at a dstace greater than the depth of he member fom the membered, the avaiable web local yielding strength ofthe column is detennined as follows, where the ‘engthof hearing. fis taken asthe bean flange thickness. Ra Fete Stan +) =(50 Xsi(0.550 in (1.50 in) +085 in} = 222 kips 7 (Spec. Bq. 110-2) (Check fange local bending of the eatumm “The availabe strength ofthe columa dve to flange local bending is determined as follows: (Spec. Bq. J101) (98 = 090253 Kips) 28 bipe-<317 ips, mg, a a e151 ips <2I2 Kips mae Based onthe checks of web local yielding, web local crippling, ad flange local heading the columa requtes cootinity plats. The continuity plates must be designed wo resist th iifference between te flange fore, Ry ange Ot Re ng athe lesser of the column web ‘ocal yieling, web local crippling, and lange loeal bending strengths: Awaocas sr or Sram. Conse TRAD as ; ‘ . LRFD ASD ie We a” 150 B= Rope Oe R= Reng RI AiO hpe ne ciate” be: Sree ay Se ate = 95.0 kips = 64.0 kips Avena eric Stax CoxsranotsUsing a continsty plate with that closely matches the beam flange width For the Ujo-thiek continuity plat, the required weld size Pome ft ° a | ae : 597 im _ 0.380 ware w=0672 ee see = 067404 in) 067204 in) = 0169 =0168 in Select 450i the pte width. Make sore tht this plate width fs within the column oe ‘ange: {Use ein let welds between he continuity plate and he column Mange (bth sides f the 122i, 090 in | din. O590m se5in >450in ok, ise). fools Forte welds beeen he cotimity ate and she column we a wed sie wl be hen { igstronger than the avalible shear strength of ity pate contact area with he | soesequie cnet ois wo conioney pan, base on thi it of eae yl thats stroger an the avalible sear strength of he cosy Pi sea ation tre Tie design aproach mects AISC Seismic Provisions Secon E363), aout a lias this connection snot equred a comply with SMF requirements i RFD SD Detiving the weld sive as was dove previously forthe gust plain esion: | qeapiten te > Ry (2 plates aD > Re 5 ao en) 90808, : - 040%; ‘ iia on (060) F077) > 8805 reuse 250) Fe (0707) r ; | ‘950G\G0 ks ASO In) > GSO ksix.50 in) _[__Lootwoontsoss) _], + 2,00(0.60)(50 ksi) | state $0288 in. [307506070 bs} 0707) |Bs0y(0.60)(70 4s} 0707) = 067i =nsrr ‘Therefore Yin-thick continuity plates will be wsed. For the 4-inthick cootinity plate, the weld siz required Design the welds between the continuity piates and column omits) ‘There are several sign considerations that could be used to determine the required weld roi ‘ize. For the welds between the continuity plates and columm, tbe welds will be designed 10 er ‘be atleast a stg asthe valle strength ofthe contact sea of the contin ple with {Use Heda, illet welds between he contimaty plate andthe cokumn web (bth sides of the the flange. Tis deignsppreach mets he excepton in AISC Seione Provision Secon plate) i | EL.60(64), although this connection isnot required to comply with OME requirements, 2. | Using the expression forthe required weld size 10 develop plate in tension discussed pre Check beam web-to-colkimn connection ‘viously forthe gusset plate, the fillet welds atthe continuity plate to column flange are sized ‘The beam seb is subject to gravity forces from beam shear in adkition to forces from th- g | fatows ek TRFD “The required shear sng ofthe beam forthe cate of tension in the race is alate a follows. The gravity shears from the beam act in the opposite direction as the brace force i | & ae writs 10: wet wel te ! 2(1.5)4(0.60) Frcx (0.707)| (1-50) 9 (0.6) Fexx (0.707)} * ‘peel + 2.00(50 ksi ib /2(4.5)(0:75)(0.60)(70 ksi)(0.707)| /2(4-50)(1.67)(0.60)(70 ksa)(0.707)| oor, =06m | ‘Anca re or See. Conarncron Avena Ins oF Sra. ConsrmuTH298 [BRACED FRAMES ‘5:3 SPECIAL CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES sam) RD ASD RFD SD [LRED Load Combination 7 fom ASCE/SEI 7 Section 124.23 ‘ASD Load Combination § from ASCEISEL 7 Section 12.4.2.3 Vi=(09-0285)V+ Vim =(06-0.1455)Vo+0.7¥eq, Y= 07(-4.50 ips) +237 hips Ys 046-450 Rips) +166 kips 2234 kips = 168 kips ‘The required shear strength ofthe beam forthe case of compression in the brace s based om sabrace expected strength of 444 kips (LRFD) and 311 kips (ASD). As calculated previously fo Vay (LRFD) und Vas (ASD) TRFD ASD LLRFD Load Combination 5 from ASCEISEI 7 Section 12.432 {ASD Load Combination 5 toma ASCESEL7 Section 1243.2 Vj= (12402508 Vo +Vou 405%, | Ve=(10+0.18535) YD +0:7Vou Ye=1.4(480 kis) +191 ips Vg=1.4(4 50 igs) +138 ips +0.5(3.00 ps) =139 ips =199 Kips ‘The swengt ofthe beam in shear is, fom AISC Manual Table 3.6 LRFD ASD % oe - 29S kips> 234 kips ok, 197 kips>164 kips ok. ‘At the column face, the available shear strength is reduced by dhe material removed forthe veld access holes, From Table 1-1 and Table 1-3, weld access hole type B apps tothe \W24x68 and the (3) and (4) dimensions are in. and ¥ in. respectively. The available shear strength is determined from AISC Specification Section G2. Vp={(06YS0ksi|23.7 in. —2(0585 in. +% in. +14 in) ]}0.15 in) 49 Kips ‘Asoc esr or Sr. Cento ra 00249 ips) 219 ips > 234 hips ok, a,” 130 =166kips> 166 kips ode ‘The final design is show in Figure SS, Example 5.3.12. SCBF Brace-to-Beam/Column Connection Design—In-Plane Brace Buckling Given: Refer to Figure $-49. Design the brace-to-beam connection ot Joint T-1 shown schemati- cally in Figure 5-49. The brace erientation, connection type, transfer force, anx beam shear due to gravity loads are shown in Figure 5-50. The connection configuration shown in Figure 5S1, which maes use of hinge plat" llows large inelastic rations for inplane brace bucking with small Dexeral demand on the connection and supporting members. In {his configuration, large inelastic rotations are accommodated with the advantage of having ‘a compact connection (Therion and Fortney, 2012). Thi is ifferent from the epproach shovin in Examples 5.3.10 and $3.11, where the brace i expected to bueKle out of the plane ‘ofthe frame. The round HSS trace is ASTM ASOO Grade B and the bear and column are ‘ASTM A902, Use ASTM AS72 Grade 50 plate material, The bolts ae ASTM A49O-X. “The completed design shown in Figure 5-51 will be verified inthis example rom Example 5.3.11, the expected strengths of the HSS6.875%0 500 brace ae: Prensin = 550 ips Pe = 44 Rips (0.3Pcnpncton = 133 ips (pst buckling strength from AISC Seismic Provisions Section F23i)