Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2017 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

ISSN No: - 2456 - 2165

Performance Management System in Construction

Priyanka Ambadas Vadnal Smita Pataskar
Pursuing M.E. Construction & Management Engineering, Assisstant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering
D.Y. Patil college of engineering, Akurdi, Pune D. Y. Patil college of engineering, Akurdi, Pune.
pgcivilcm@gmail.com
vadnalpriyanka@gmail.com

ABSTRACT-This paper displays an audit of writing of worker's work destinations and general commitment to the
execution management in construction industry with the association. Something beyond a yearly execution audit,
point of planning best practice into construction. execution administration is the persistent procedure of
Activities are sorted out to fulfill complex undertakings setting targets, evaluating progress and giving on-going
that can't be taken care of by single people yet by instructing and input to guarantee that workers are meeting
multidisciplinary groups in the construction business. their destinations and profession objectives.
Extend achievement relies on how well the personnel can
function viably to fulfill targets inside degree, cost and B. Performance Measurement
quality imperatives. Project Managers and Engineers
are depended with the undertaking of coordinating the Performance measurement is the general gathering and
disciplinary and the between authoritative endeavors revealing of data about the sources of info, productivity and
under changing condition for fruitful achievement of the adequacy of the development ventures. Organizations utilize
predetermined destinations. They operate independently execution estimation to judge their venture exhibitions, both
with the only aim of achieving the specified goals within as far as the monetary and non-money related viewpoints
optimum available resources. They assume total and to thoroughly analyze the execution with others,
responsibilities and accountability for the success or keeping in mind the end goal to enhance program
failure of the project. Hence, there is the need for productivity and viability in their associations. Additionally,
performance management as a system for managing and estimations are expected to tract, figure, and at last control
integrating organizational and employee performance. those factors that are vital to the accomplishment of a
In this paper, knowledge on performance management is venture.
obtained and a study on its various measurement
methods is done. A survey will be set up by recognizing C. Benefits of Performance Measurement
the essential parts of the venture which the staff ought to
know for playing out his work effectively. In general, performance measurements have been used by
companies to:
Keywords- Performance Management system(PMS), 1. Evaluate Performance measurement of program
Performance Measurement, Balanced scorecard method, outputs and outcomes provides important information
Last planner system. on current program status and how much progress is
being made towards program goals. Thus, performance
I. INTRODUCTION measurement of an organization is a way to make an
assessment and comparison with other companies.
The construction industry has been accused of being
wasteful, inefficient and ineffective. The construction 2. Control Processes can only be controlled from the
industry has long been recognized as having problems in its moment the company is able to define their
structure, particularly with fragmentation that has hindered performance standards. Performance measurement is
its performance. The construction of highways and used in the recognition of problems, which is identified
infrastructure has received a tremendous boost with the when a particular indicator shows a deviation from the
country poised to make incredibly huge investments in established pattern.
construction sector in the next 10 years. A large numbers of
projects with cost size ranging from hundreds to thousand 3. View Measurements are used to establish the initial
croresare being executed in the country. Competitive diagnosis before implementing interventions for
pressures from within the industry, as well as external improving companys processes. They aim to identify
aspects like political, economic and other considerations are strengths and weaknesses or dysfunctions, from which
forcing the industry to re-examine and improve its operating priorities are given to the implementation of
strategies. improvement actions.
A. Performance Management 4. Motivate Measures can be utilized as a part of an
extremely successful route by including and spurring
Performance management is a procedure by which managers
and employees cooperate to arrange, screen and survey a

IJISRT17MY180 www.ijisrt.com 728

Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2017 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No: - 2456 - 2165

individuals for consistent change, giving people a In a nutshell, performance can be defined as the evaluation
criticism all alone execution. of employee contributions to the business
strategy.Measuring performance should be consistent, i.e.
measured in accordance with a single set of principles and
5. Promote Performance measures can be used to rules. However,Conveying the importance of measuring
validate success, justify additional resources, and earn individual performance can only be achieved if senior
customers, stakeholders, staff loyalty by showing management sets the example, As a result, performance
results and win recognition inside and outside the management may also be considered as a strong link in a
organization. companys corporate culture, via the impact and behaviour it
generates.Defining objectives and evaluating achievements
6. Celebrate Celebration is imperative since it persuades, over a given period requires communication between each
advances, enlists and enhances execution since it employee, their direct manager and also a higher-ranked
inspires individuals to enhance facilitate in the manager. There is significant value in discussing,
following year, quarter, or month. Festivity enhances negotiating and commenting on such performance
execution since it conveys consideration regarding the objectives. Evaluation sessions where performance is
organization, and in this way advances its fitness.. reviewed may be scheduled to tie in with a specific business
cycle, such as at the end of a mission or project this process
7. Systematic Benchmarking is not a random method of helps managers to sharpen their coaching abilities by
collecting information, it is a systematic, structured step forcing them to identify problems as early as possible. Short
by step process that aim to evaluate the market working review cycles enable corrective actions to be taken,
practices. The outputs of this process allow companies priorities to be changed and even crisis situations to be
to compare their products, services and methods of avoided.
working with organizations representing best practices.
Performance Management Systems incorporate following
8. Continuous Benchmarking is an improvement process aspects:-
that must be continuous to be truly effective. It cant be 1. Understanding of the Performance framework
developed once and then neglected, thinking that the (objectives, roles and standards of performance).
task is completed. It must be a continuous process, 2. Planning for performance improvement both at
since the practices are continually changing. individual and organizational level.
3. Assessment and continuous review of performance
9. Evaluation The immediate objective of benchmarking output at all levels.
is to evaluate a process and hence, necessarily, 4. Constructive feedback and support.
measurements areessential and constituent parts of this
process.

10. Products, Services and Processes Benchmarking can

be applied to all business aspects. It can be applied to
products and basic services, to the process to get those
products and to all processes, methods and practices
that constitute the support to reach the customer
effectively.
Fig 1: The Performance Management Framework
D. Performance Management System in general
(Source: Armstrong, 2006: p504)
Performance management is a progressing procedure of
correspondence between a boss and a representative that
II. METHODOLOGY
happens consistently, in support of achieving the vital
targets of the association. The motivation behind an
A. Performance Management Process
execution administration framework is to survey and
An effective performance management system includes the
guarantee that the worker is doing their obligations which
following components:
they are utilized to do in a powerful and attractive way,
which is adding to the general business objectives.Within
1) Performance Planning-
each association, Performance Management is a basic issue
Performance planning is the main significant segment
affecting the various parts of Human Resources
of any execution administration prepares which frames
administration. It adds to the ID, improvement and
the premise of execution examinations. Execution
maintenance of high-potential representatives and key
arranging is mutually done by the evaluate and
patrons.The current economic environment is characterized
furthermore the appraiser in the start of an execution
by downsizing, mergers and acquisitions, and cost-cutting
session. Amid this period, the workers choose the
through consolidation and centralization measures.
objectives and the key execution ranges which can be
Performance Management can strongly influence these
performed over a year inside the execution spending
corporate events and can mean the difference between their
plan. That is finished after a common assertion between
success and failure.
the detailing officer and the worker.

IJISRT17MY180 www.ijisrt.com 729

Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2017 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No: - 2456 - 2165

executing competency mapping and different evaluation

2) Performance Appraisal and Reviewing- strategies, potential examination is performed. Potential
The appraisals are typically performed twice in a year evaluation gives significant contributions to progression
in an association as mid audits and yearly surveys arranging and employment Rotation.
which is held toward the finish of the money related
year. In this procedure, the assess first offers the self- B. Performance Measurement Methods
topped off evaluations in the self-examination shape
and furthermore portrays his/her accomplishments over 1. Balanced Scorecard Method
a timeframe in quantifiable terms. After the self-
evaluation, the last appraisals are given by the appraiser The Balanced Score Card (BSC) is an execution
to the quantifiable and quantifiable accomplishments of administration framework which fuses four fundamental
the representative being assessed. The whole procedure estimation classifications (viewpoints) each of which with
of survey looks for a dynamic investment of both the an extensive variety of potential sub-measures. It was
worker and the appraiser for investigating the reasons conceived by Harvard business college teacher Robert
for provisos in the execution and how it can be Kaplan and Renaissance Solutions president David Norton.
overcome. The fundamental contrast with customary ways to deal with
execution estimation is that it incorporates a scope of
3) Feedback on the Performance followed by personal "driving and slacking" markers client point of view,
counseling and performance facilitation- inner/business procedures, learning and development, and
Feedback and directing is given a considerable measure money related - to assess whether a business is pushing
of significance in the execution administration handle. toward its vital objectives. Undoubtedly, the BSC
This is the phase in which the worker gains mindfulness accentuates that with a specific end goal to oversee
from the appraiser about the ranges of enhancements methodology; an association must quantify its execution
and furthermore data on whether the representative is through execution pointers subsequent to dissecting its
contributing the normal levels of execution or not. The operations in an iterative way. The BSC perceives that the
worker gets an open and an exceptionally money related measures are slacking pointers and in this
straightforward input and alongside this the preparation manner the aftereffect of the other three driving markers. At
and improvement needs of the representative is likewise the end of the day the main pointers manage issues that will
distinguished. The appraiser receives all the in the end effect on the monetary execution, yet vitally,
conceivable strides to guarantee that the representative before they have had sufficient energy to have any impact.
meets the normal results for an association through
compelling individual advising and direction, tutoring
and speaking to the worker in preparing programs
which build up the abilities and enhance the general
profitability.

4) Rewarding good performance-

This is an exceptionally fundamental part as it will
decide the work inspiration of a worker. Amid this
stage, a worker is freely perceived for good execution
and is compensated. This stage is exceptionally delicate
for a representative as this may affect the confidence
and accomplishment introduction. Any commitments
properly perceived by an association helps a worker in
adapting up to the disappointments effectively and
fulfills the requirement for warmth. Fig. 2 The four Perspectives of balanced scorecard
Source: www.akssupprt.com
5) Performance Improvement Plans-
In this stage, crisp arrangement of objectives are built 2. Last Planner System
up for a representative and new due date is
accommodated achieving those destinations. The The Last Planner System (LPS) for generation control has
representative is unmistakably imparted about the been actualized in development ventures with fluctuating
territories in which the worker is relied upon to enhance levels of progress, to build the dependability of arranging,
and a stipulated due date is additionally allocated inside enhance generation execution, and make an anticipated
which the worker must demonstrate this change. This work process. Through the LPS strategy, extend groups
arrangement is together created by the evaluate and the resolve to finish allocated undertakings in a given week.
appraiser and is commonly affirmed. Some lean development specialists allude to rate arranges
finish (PPC) as a metric for responsibility unwavering
6) Potential Appraisal- quality. PPC esteem does not gauge the level of usage of a
Potential examination frames a reason for both work process (productivity). Rather it quantifies creation
horizontal and vertical development of workers. By arranging adequacy and work process unwavering quality.

IJISRT17MY180 www.ijisrt.com 730

Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2017 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No: - 2456 - 2165

At every week by week meeting, time is given to learn and

comprehend why certain assignments were not finished as Promotions are done strictly based on
arranged in the earlier week, before making another week by performance measured
week plan to be executed. The uncompleted arrangements
12%
are contemplated and broke down to decide the obstructions Strongly agree
and underlying drivers that influenced the execution 12%
28% Agree
procedure.
16% Not Decided
III. ANALYSIS 32%
Disagree
A poll study was directed on 25 development
Strongly disagree
representatives who incorporate specialists, fashioners,
organizers, extend supervisor and so on. The graph speaks to
the reaction of the five most critical inquiries identified with
PMS. Chart 4. Response outcome of PMS

Organisation operates a formal PMS Existing PMS need to be improved

10%
8% Strongly Agree
Strongly agree
28% 24% 41% Agree
Agree 8%
16% Not Decided not Decided
28% 33%
Disagree Disagree
Strongly disagree Strongly Disagree
4%

Chart 1. Response on working of PMS Chart 5. Response on improvement of PMS

IV. RESULT
Goals set for performance evaluation are
mutually decided goals From the study it is uncovered that the 40% of workers feel
that the current PMS ought to be enhanced so as to get most
12% Strongly agree extreme profitability.
12%
40% Agree
0% V. CONCLUSION
Not Decided
36% All through the most recent two decades various ventures,
Disagree essentially producing, have acquainted new strategies and
Strongly disagree procedures with move customary ideal models keeping in
mind the end goal to enhance their execution. This has
prompted the formation of new rationalities, for example,
simultaneous designing/development, lean creation or
Chart 2. Response on Process of PMS development and numerous others, for example, JIT, TQM,
and TPM and so on.Most of the methods have its own
advantages and drawbacks. For an effective performance
PMS is transparent theorganizations should give more importance to the non-
financial measures than the financial. If done so it will
12% indirectlyreflect the improvement in the financial
Strongly agree performance of the organization. The various methods have
28% given significance tothe non-financial measures.
16% Agree
Additionally works of the postulation includes planning of
20% Not Decided poll in light of the different parts of a venture according to
24%
Disagree specified in the techniques and an overview will be done in
different organizations to check the related learning of the
Strongly disagree faculty towards those viewpoints. Having learning on these
viewpoints will in a roundabout way reflect in their
execution.
Chart 3. Response on Transparency of PMS

IJISRT17MY180 www.ijisrt.com 731

Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2017 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No: - 2456 - 2165

REFERENCE

1) T. V. Rao, (2011) Performance management and

appraisal systemsage publication India pvt. Ltd.,
Pearson education, 2011, pp. 75-80.
2) Robert S. Kaplan, Conceptual Foundations of the
Balanced Scorecard, 2010.
3) Takim, R, Akintoye, A and Kelly, J (2003) Performance
measurement systems in construction. In:Greenwood, D
J (Ed.), 19th Annual ARCOM Conference,Vol. 1, 423-
32.
4) ToongKhuan Chan and Poh Tin Hiap (2012), A
Balanced Scorecard Approach to Measuring Industry
Performance, Journal of Construction in Developing
Countries, Supp. 1, 2341.
5) H. A. Bassioni; A. D. F. Price; and T. M. Hassan
(2014), Performance Measurement In Construction,
the Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 20,
No.2, ASCE.
6) Ms.B.Kaviya, Ms.C.Hema (2015), Performance
Management In Construction., International Journal of
Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and
Technology, Vol. 4, Issue 4.
7) Fei Deng and Hedley Smyth (2014), Nature of Firm
Performance in Construction ,Journal of Construction
Engineering and Management, 140(2): 04013040.
8) A.R. Rezaei (2011), Performance measurement in a
quality management system, ScientiaIranica,
Transactions E: Industrial Engineering 18, 742752.
9) G.B. Lin and Q.P. Shen (2010), Development of
Performance Measurement Framework for
ValueManagement Studies in Construction. ASCE.
10) Armstrong, M. (2006). A Handbook of Human
Resource Management, 10th ed. London: Kogan

IJISRT17MY180 www.ijisrt.com 732