Uniformly distributed load of intensity q
Linearly distributed load of maximum intensity q0
Couple of magnitute M0
Concentrated load of magnitude P
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of
moment 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
edit] Notes]
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed- 14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
end
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of
moment 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
moment
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of
moment 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of
moment 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of
moment 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
moment
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
Example
Example
.The statically indeterminate beam shown in the figure is to be analysed
. Members AB, BC, CD have the same length•
.Flexural rigidities are EI, 2EI, EI respectively•
.Concentrated load of magnitude acts at a distance from the support A•
.Uniform load of intensity acts on BC•
. Member CD is loaded at its midspan with a concentrated load of magnitude•
.In the following calcuations, counterclockwise moments are positive
edit] Fixed-end moments]
edit] Distribution factors]
.The distribution factors of joints A and D are DAB = 1,DDC = 0
edit] Carryover factors]
.The carryover factors are , except for the carryover factor from D (fixed support) to C which is zero
edit] Moment distribution]
Joint A Joint B Joint C Joint D
Distrib.
0 1 0.2727 0.7273 0.6667 0.3333 0 0
factors
Fixed-
end
14.700 6.300- 8.333 8.333- 12.500 12.500-
moment
s
Step 1 14.700- → 7.350-
Step 2 1.450 3.867 → 1.934
Step 3 2.034- ← 4.067- 2.034- → 1.017-
Step 4 0.555 1.479 → 0.739
Step 5 0.246- ← 0.493- 0.246- → 0.123-
Step 6 0.067 0.179 → 0.090
Step 7 0.030- ← 0.060- 0.030- → 0.015-
Step 8 0.008 0.022 → 0.011
Step 9 0.004- ← 0.007- 0.004- → 0.002-
Step 10 0.001 0.003
Sum of
moment 0 11.569- 11.569 10.186- 10.186 13.657-
s
Numbers in grey are balaced moments; arrows ( → / ← ) represent the carry-over of moment from one end
.to the other end of a member
edit] Result]
Moments at joints determined by the moment distribution method•
The conventional engineer's sign convention is used here, i.e. positive moments cause elongation at
.the bottom part of a beam member
For comparison purposes, the following are the results generated using a matrix method. Note that in the
analysis above, the iterative process was carried to >0.01 precision. The fact that the matrix analysis results
.and the moment distribution analysis results match to 0.001 precision is mere coincidence
Moments at joints determined by the matrix method•
The complete shear and bending moment diagrams are as shown. Note that the moment distribution method
only determines the moments at the joints. Developing complete bending moment diagrams require
.additional calculations using the determined joint moments and internal section equilibrium
SFD and BMD•
Shear force diagram Bending moment diagram
