FEM Analysis On Stiffened Plates Using ANSYS: Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering by
FEM Analysis On Stiffened Plates Using ANSYS: Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering by
FEM Analysis On Stiffened Plates Using ANSYS: Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical Engineering by
A Thesis Submitted to
National Institute of Technology, Rourkela
In Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
Bachelor of Technology
In
Mechanical Engineering
By
DANDAPATI HAREESH
109ME0572
KINTALI VINOD
109ME0067
Dandapati Hareesh
109ME0572
Kintali Vinod
109ME0067
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the thesis entitled FEM Analysis of Stiffened plates using ANSYS
Hareesh, Roll No. 109ME0572 and Kintali Vinod , Roll No. 109ME0067 for the award of the
work carried out by him under my supervision and guidance. The results presented in this thesis
has not been, to the best of my knowledge, submitted to any other University or Institute for the
The thesis, in my opinion, has reached the standards fulfilling the requirement for the award of
Supervisor,
Prof. Anirban Mitra.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ABSTRACT
In the present world, the increasing demand of structurally efficient and significantly higher
strength to weight ratio structures is mostly served by Stiffened plates. These structural
elements can be defined as plates reinforced by a single or a set of beams or ribs on one or
both sides of the plate. So, stiffened plates are made up of plate elements, to which generally
loading is applied, and beam elements located at discrete spacings in one or both directions.
The present work deals with the structural behaviour of a stiffened plate under static uniform
loads. Firstly, we will consider a geometrically nonlinear beam problem by analyzing the
large deflections of a beam of linear elastic material, under the action of transverse load along
its length. Under the action of these external loads, the beam deflects into a curve called the
elastic curve. Firstly, the relationship between the beam deflection and the loads would be
established using Ansys and then the results would be extended to perform analysis on
Stiffened plates. The linear and nonlinear behaviour of the beams would be studied under
static loading .The simulation analysis is completed with a numerical analysis of the system
using the ANSYS program, a comprehensive finite element package, which enables students
to solve the nonlinear differential equation . ANSYS provides a rich graphics capability that
can be used to display results of analysis on a high-resolution graphics workstation.
CONTENTS
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Need for Stiffened plates .. 4
1.2 Aim of the Present Work .. 6
1.3 Methodology adopted 7
1.4 Behaviour of cantilever beams under uniform loading ..
LITERATURE SURVEY 12
ANALYSIS .. 14
3.1 Procedure for performing non-linear analysis on a cantilever beam (point load )
15
3.2 Procedure for performing non-linear analysis on a cantilever beam (uniform loading) 18
3.3 Procedure for performing non-linear analysis on a stiffened plate 19
3.3.1
Geometric modeling 19
3.3.2
23
24
CONCLUSION .
REFRENCES . 31
29
Page 1
LIST OF FIGURES:
3.1 Values that are fed in Soln Control for non-linear analysis 16
3.2 Nodal diagram of a cantilever beam......................................................... 17
3.3 Creating key points in active CS mode..
19
24
4.4 Deflection profile of the stiffened plate when the stiffener is at center . 25
4.5 Deflection profile of the stiffened plate when the stiffener is shifted 25
towards one of plates edges
4.6 Graph for stiffener position Vs. normalized Deflection for 1000 (N/m2). 27
4.7 Graph for stiffener position Vs. normalized Deflection for 20000 (N/m2).. 27
4.8 Graph for stiffener position Vs. Normalized Deflection for 100000 (N/m2)
27
Page 2
Chapter
INTRODUCTION
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 3
Page 4
In fact, there are virtually innumerable engineering applications of these components, which
only serve to underline their efficiency, as well as their importance.
Page 5
Page 6
The finite element method (FEM) (its practical application often known as finite element
analysis (FEA)) is a numerical technique for finding approximate solutions to partial
differential equations (PDE) and their systems, as well as (less often) integral equations. In
simple terms, FEM has an in built algorithm which divides very large problems (in terms of
complexity) into small elements which can be solved in relation to each other. FEM solves
the equations using the Galerkin method with polynomial approximation functions. The
solution is obtained by eliminating the spatial derivatives from the partial differential
equation. This approximates the PDE with
These equation systems are linear if the corresponding PDE is linear and vice versa.
Algebraic equation systems are solved using numerical linear algebra methods. The ordinary
differential equations that arise in transient problems are numerically integrated using
techniques such as Euler's method or the Runge-Kutta method.
In solving PDEs, the major problem is to create an equation that approximates the equation
to be analysed, but is numerically stable, meaning that errors in the input and intermediate
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 7
Geometric Non-Linearity:
Structures whose stiffness is dependent on the displacement which they may undergo are
termed geometrically nonlinear. Geometric nonlinearity accounts for phenomena such as the
stiffening of a loaded clamped plate, and buckling or 'snap-through' behavior in slender
structures or components. Without taking these geometric effects into account, a computer
simulation may fail to predict the real structural behavior.
Material Non-Linearity:
Material Nonlinearity refers to the ability for a material to exhibit a nonlinear stress-strain
(constitutive) response. Elasto-plastic, hyperelastic, crushing, and cracking are good
examples, but this can also include temperature and time-dependent effects such as viscoelasticity or visco-plasticity (creep). Material nonlinearity is often, but not always,
characterized by a gradual weakening of the structural response as an increasing force is
applied, due to some form of internal decomposition.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 8
Page 9
Nonzero displacements.
Page 10
The top level consists of the load steps that you define explicitly over a time span.
Loads are assumed to vary linearly within load steps (for static analysis).
Within each load step, you can direct the program to perform several solutions (sub
steps or time steps) to apply the load gradually.
Page 11
Chapter
LITERATURE SURVEY
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 12
Author
Journal, Theoretical/
Software
Method
Material
Vol,
Analytical/
used
used
used
Page
Experimental/
Findings
Statistical
1992
D.Vennugopal
Vol
Rao,
Raphson
parametric
of
993
Iteration
plate
generalized
A.K. Sheikh
47 Mathematical
FORTRAN77 Newton-
formula
M.Mukhopadhyay
1999 A.K.
M.Mukhopadhyay
NA
finite
, 765-
strip
785
2011 Anirban Mitra,
Spline
Prasanta Sahoo
methods
Aluminium Dynamic
behavior
furnished
in
form
the
of
back bone
curves
Page 13
Chapter
ANALYSIS
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 14
Page 15
8. Define Loads ->Structural-> Displacement ->On areas (the face which are to be fixed are
selected and the displacement value is set to 0)
9. Define loads ->Structural->force/moment->On Nodes (where the required node is selected
from the list of nodes)
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
8. Define Loads ->Structural-> Displacement ->On areas (the face which are to be fixed are
selected and the displacement value is set to 0)
9. Define loads ->Structural->force/moment->On Nodes (where the required node is selected
from the list of nodes)
Page 20
Chapter
Page 21
1.VALIDATION PLOT:
Validation of the present method has been carried out by comparing the results available in
literature. The results of the static analysis including the nonlinear results are validates with
those of Sheik and Mukhopadhyay[1], Rao et al[3], Korko and Olson[2], and Anirban Mitra,
Prasanta Sahoo and Kashinath Saha[4]. The dimensions and the geometry of the clamped
stiffened plate which were subjected to transverse loading is as shown in the figure () .The
plots for maximum deflection were compared, and it is seen that they are in good agreement
with the already established results.
These results were observed on a stiffened plate with a single stiffener though the middle of
the plate. The physical properties of the plate were assumed to be Es = Ep =71.7GPa, = 0.33.
The stiffened plate was analyzed under CCCC condition , where C denotes Clamping
condition. In this case all the four faces were clamped.
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Fig 4.4 Deflection profile of the stiffened plate when the stiffener is at centre
Fig 4.5 Deflection profile of the stiffened plate when the stiffener is shifted
towards left from the centre
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 25
Page 26
Fig 4.6, 4.7, 4.8 are the Graphs for stiffener position Vs. Normalized Deflection for 1000,
20000, 100000 (N/m2).
Page 27
From the above plot we can say that the change in the stiffener geometry has hardly changed
the stiffness of the plate.
Page 28
Chapter
CONCLUSION
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 29
Conclusion :
1. The Results exhibit hardening type nonlinearity. Stiffness of the system increases with
deflection. It shows the effect of stretching of mid-plane of the plate (geometric nonlinearity).
2. From the discussions regarding the position of the stiffener, it can be safely said that the
maximum stiffness or the lowest deflection can be obtained when the stiffener is placed at the
center of the plate.
3. Change of the stiffener geometry (while maintaining the cross-sectional area constant)
apparently doesnt have significant effect on the stiffness of the plate.
Page 30
Chapter
REFERENCES
Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT Rourkela
Page 31
References .
[1].Sheik, A.H. and Mukhopadhyay, M Geometric nonlinear analysis of stiffened plates by
spline finite strip method. Computers & structures, 76 (3),2000,765-785
[2].Koko, T.S. and Olson, M.D. Nonlinear analysis of stiffened plates using super elements ,
International Journal Of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 31(2),1991, 319-343
[3].Rao, D.V. Sheikh, A.H. and Mukhopadhyay, A finite element large displacement analysis
of stiffened plates. Computers & Structures,47 (6),1993,987-993.
[4].Roberto Ojeda, B Gangadhara Prusty, A new approach for the large deflection finite
element analysis of isotropic and composite plates with arbitrary orientated stiffeners. Finite
elements in Analysis and design,43, 2007, 989-1002
[5]. Nonlinear finite element method models for ultimate strength analysis of steel stiffenedplate structures under combined biaxial compression and lateral pressure actions ,Thin walled
structures, 47, 2009 ,1008-1017
[6]. https://www.sharcnet.ca/
Page 32