1

Antagonized Postulations of a Brief Nature

Omar Alansari-Kreger

Abstracted Brief
It is a law of common sense to suggest that humans are social creatures which is one
of the reasons why we cooperate, corroborate, and coexist with each other. Cultures
transform into sociological aphorisms and from there entire civilizations are born as they
are conceived both figuratively and literally. Our greatest destiny is underscored by the
birth pains of civilization. As we try to civilize our societal assemblage we fall victim to
arbitrary resolutions which is largely forged out of fear. That is one of the reasons why
the realm of abstract power stands as a supreme edifice onto itself which creates
totalitarian constructs for civilization and dissipates itself authoritatively. The division of
civilization falls into competing fiefdoms of power which puts humanity in its classical
predicament; we can use the sociological devices of power for benign or malignant
purposes. Both will overlap at some point, but deviations made in both categorical
proximities will ultimately determine the quality of our manifested civilizations.

Obfuscation of the Intellectual Dictum

The most arcane passage is typically the most obtuse. Academics have made
entire careers by situating their discoveries on simple passages dressed in heavy
handed wordage. The necessity for context creates an underlying dictum that demands
the creation of content. If it is in our interest to decipher something with any sense of
clarity it becomes necessary to define the variable in question. With that in mind the
simplest passage has the potential to create an entire ideology of its own; the arising
problem confronts the actual byproduct that is produced. If something can be explained
in a simple equation that thrives off its own brevity, the creation of definitive context
through the use of intense verbiage seems to be rather superfluous. Deep in the mind of
the academic, there is trepidation of fear toward those that can rise to the same
intellectual challenge at the same level.
That is why the world has been polarized by class barriers that dissuade
humankind from the discovery of its potential; that is why billions are condemned to their
institutional niches. The nuance that we have set forth has the ability to take on a
double standard that is as liberating as it is disastrous; the problem with the human
condition is that most experiencing it focus on the temperamental nature of its
immediate transience. A new dictum for the ages will be an ideology whether we want it

to be as such or not; if we were to imagine humanity with the absence of its ideologies it
can be concluded that the condition of the species would be abundantly insipid.
Academics contribute to that ideological insipidness once the heyday of an ideology has
served its purpose for humankind; that perpetuates an obtuse cycle of antiintellectuality.

The Generational Features of Reality

The best way to reconcile with the unknown is to acknowledge the finesse of its
innumerability. There is more than one way of defining the dimensionality of space and
when pressed to a single out a variable it becomes necessary to derive a tautological
point of view. The duality of the human condition demands that all things have the
tendency to be redundant no matter how original a point of view happens to be. A
forward thinking thought can be detracted simultaneously while sanctioned in a
reversed mannerism. The logic of opposition demands such an adaptation. To be
defined as an inheritor of a counter culture is to make a generational statement for the
times; at that point it comes down to a choice of civilizational resolve. An extrapolation
of intellect is enough to cause a schism which in this case transforms into a chasm as a
result of the event that is produced by the former.
The emptiness of space presents a chanced opportunity to embark on the new
dynamics of reality; the latter is something that is not just confined to the physicality of a
substances usefulness. A new feature fomenting out of a stream of human
consciousness describes a channeled interpretation that discerns between the standing
realities of generational time. Whenever an ideating mind is brought to a point of
philosophization there is a burden that falls on the mind demanding that we reconfigure
the knowns with the unknowns.
A middle ground interpretation is enough to derive an original extrapolation of proverbial
interpretation which is confined to its generational features of reality.

Semantical Resolution for Times of Chaos

The most dubious underpinning of time arrives whenever we are pressed against
the atrocity of its miscalculation. For those that anticipate the inherent insidiousness of
time they are looking for habitual redundancy made out of an ardent clause of stupidity.
Yet as obscene as some of our blunders have been this is the nave perception that
demands, in one way or another that we predict with absolute precision when a stupid
sociological blunder will occur. From that standpoint there is a thread of encouragement

that demands that during dubious times it becomes a matter of practical action to mock
the past in the best practical way possible. The force of nostalgists are some of the
most relentless when pressed for their desire to achieve a resolute outcome. From timeto-time it becomes necessary to discern between commonalities found on different
plains of reality; thus, the idea of the nostalgist is brought into the interpretive fold of the
literalist.
Dubiousness encourages a factor of uncertainty and once that is culturally
manufactured there is this force of sociological fear that accommodates the modus of
resolute action. The idea is to encourage any manipulator to press upon a populations
conceptions of total fear; whenever we find ourselves at such a state there are blinders
brought over our eyes which encourages arbitrary cohesion to the norm. Where there is
literalism there is a show of nostalgia that demands the alliteration of the past
experience; that implies that we must direct all of our egos into one sociological basket.
The greatest show of force that brings it together manifests through semantical
resolutions made by generations which defines the human experience.

An Absence of Mental Space

Whenever we try prying into the innards of our inhibited sociological space we
cant help but to question the validity of the norm. The omnipotence of the norm is
supposed to entice our sense of mind up until the point where we find total saturation in
it. A person, isolated in the temperament of their own reality, observes and dwells on the
dynamics of their immediate sociological field of reference as an act of instinct. That is
explained as an elemental diametric which creates the living reality of all things thought
to be normal; in one way or another, each and every aspect within the realm of reality
must attach itself to some sort of norm. If we take a look at the mechanistic world of the
twenty-first century, all forms of success are thought to be derived from superficial spoils
of reality. If a person is not able to demonstrate their material prestige to society it is
believed that the same person is dysfunctional and deficient. A person must be able to
graduate themselves into the mainstream norm in order to have any mode of
acceptance. That creates a context of fear because those that feel that they will never
be able to belong as a sanctioned member of the mainstream explains, vividly, why so
many shy away from any reactionary idea that could antagonize the omnipotent
hegemony of the mainstream norm.
The force of the mainstream is used to dumb us into absolute submission through a
system of sociological incentives where the promise of superficial materialism destroys
any and every bastion of critical intellectual thought; therein rests our enslavement into
total disillusionment.

An Absurdity of Time
There is a common folly that we cant help but to encounter at some point in our
primordial development. There are so many generations that lose their chastity by
taking the most abrupt retreat from reality. The innocence we one carried as youths is
destroyed with the radicalization of our ideas. As much as we think we can conquer our
dogmatic monsters we craft our own dogma in order to respond to the hegemony of
another. The issue at hand insists that the big picture is the most neglected. A depraved
population that has been put to the depraved gutter transforms into an aggressor that
commits crimes against those that are in lesser positions of power. The problem with
the vindication of intellect is that we are always looking for a way to achieve absolute
exoneration.
The essence of that idea describes a scenario where we are out to achieve some
form of justice in what becomes a dire effort to settle the moralistic score; in one way or
another we look for the best possible way to equalize the pain and suffering forced on
us by exterior forces; when this is brought into the civilizational perspective atrocities
become this grand game of upper handed moralism that imposes itself from the top
down. The hand of the high and mighty is a force of great suspicion because the idea of
morality becomes relevant to the cross referenced variable; those factors of causation
describe deliberate forces that are both circumstantial and situational.
The irony of time is that all things, especially of human endeavor, inescapably fall short
of our own contemporary expectations.

What is the Folly of Absolute Constitutional Power?

The idea of a sacred document is rather compelling because there is this belief
that the essence of a supra-national authority will bring humanity into compliance with
its mandated rigor. Arguing over the constitutionality of policy is one of the reasons why
interests find acute compartmentalization within the political mantra of society. The role
of the constitution is thought that select aspects of it must be employed in order to
further the interest that exists as that compartmentalized minority; somehow there is
supposed to be democratic virtue in that action. Throughout much of the free world, the
idea of liberation is a relative term because the acquisition of freedom influences the
flexibility of assembly; it is for that reason why the power of the minority is afforded with
a preferential advantage over the majority. The anonymous passage of a vote is the
surest way to allow a minority the ability to infiltrate the halls of democratic suffrage.

The idea of expressive representation spells out the term that is used to justify
that course of democratic action. If the consolidated mass of the standing majority is
brought into democratic purgatory it is thought that the best avenue of democracy
awaits us. The more a minority is able to leverage itself in a manner where it is asserted
with cohesive compromise, the merits of democracy are thought to have served their
purpose. That duality arises with the illegitimacy of the minority; an unconstitutional
minority is able to consolidate the power it needs in order to gain the necessary
headway which secures the interests of its politicized advocacy into power; if anything
that is the road leading to all things unconstitutional.

The Delirious Senility of our Time

The ability to form a resolute posture against the times is thought to be one of the
best ways to conquer the turbulence of nature. As liberating as nature is whenever we
live under the peace and security of it there is this shell of vanity that arises; after a
period of time, it becomes a cultural staple of the times. There is a great degree of
decadence that is manufactured out of a glimmer of cultural arrogance; those that fill
their own chasm with thirsts for power retain underscored contempt for the sanity of life.
Bastions of power become the pillars demanding that we reach prominent domination
by manipulating all forms of nature; within ourselves as humans and beyond. That
becomes a cultural expectation that expects blind adherence to the norms of
manufactured social artificiality. A power broker must develop a cultural mantra of
invincibility as a means of securing itself as one.
The inner monster within the old Nazi Germany is most pronounced when
reflecting on the teachings and proclamations of the suicided Dr. Goebbels; if a lie is
told as a redundant staple of popular culture the minds of everyday people will not be
able to differentiate between fact and fiction. The desire to liberate ourselves from our
limitations is thought to be one of the most envious forms of civilizational evolution; that
is why those that relentlessly pursue it become abominations onto themselves simply
because the pursuit of manipulative dominance over all things is corrupting from the
inherent power stemming from it.
To achieve such a height one must believe in the myth of their own immortality.

Obsessions made over the Proliferation of Power & Resources

An empire is made whenever we pursue an outside region that is beyond our
territorial control; of course that same statement should fold into the realm of common

sense implying that any simpleton should be able to understand such a law. Those that
gain and garner power external to their own origins describes the basis of all things
imperial; the application of its abstract scope goes on to target a geo-political arena in
hopes of deriving a totalitarian endowment through authoritative overtures. The irony is
that its pursuit is rather petty; shouldnt the budding potential of civilization strive to
achieve so much more? Is the end game all about resources and the material value that
is extrapolated from each one? The development of the first fighting force was
organized around the pursuit of that principle; those that roamed from place-to-place
had a greater disposition to the developmental ingenuity that accommodated ancient
crafts of tool making.
A nomadic lifestyle does not afford us with a great deal of security and our
innovation tries to accommodate for mobility; that can explain why tools are more
advanced when compared to those peoples and cultures that are communally lauded in
one stationary place that refuse to move. The story of civilization can suggest that the
literal pillage of the feast is countered by the harvesting of it simultaneously; the
combination of both describes the traditional dichotomies that have gone on to define
the developmental shape of our human civilization. We realize our greatest potential
when faced with the trials of adversity and that can be one of the main reasons why we
are immensely susceptible to the spoils of materialized superficiality; the pursuit of the
latter depicts what empires and their imperial domains fight and die for.

The Death of the Universal Proclamation of Human Rights

As much as we want to believe in a world of transparency there is always a rude
awakening that unfolds. The most vocal defenders of the proclamation of human rights
are some of the most prolific charlatans to the very standards in which they proclaim to
vehemently uphold. One of the primary reasons why the United Nations, or any
authority that acts in its name, is devoid of any affirmative action finds ample
explanation in the duality of its engendered humanitarian principle. The problem with
resolutions brought forward by the United Nations is that strides made in the name of
humanitarian uniformity are often backed and used as co-opted weapons of diplomacy.
The Cold War presents us with two pristine examples; both the United States and the
Soviet Union defined and often times defied the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
in ways that were manipulatively reflective of their respective foreign policies. This
standard of duality implies than an atrocity is not an atrocity as long as the selfexonerated superpower is not invading or dropping bombs on weaker nations.
From that specific standpoint, it becomes rather alarming to realize that the
characteristic nature of the cause supporting the universal declaration was formed as a

disingenuous clause from the very moment of its inception. After the Second World War
the adoption of that never again mentality stood as that central precedent of undisputed
morality in the wake of the holocaust. It becomes a matter of conniving convenience to
become the next bastion of the universal declaration because the acquiesced end within
its inner halls describes, as a matter of default by proxy, the best way to achieve global
hegemony all under the false guise of humanitarianism.

The Morbidization of the Human Condition

It is thought that the greatest bastion of our individual salvation arrives in the form
of our humanized intellect. It is thought that the possession of intellect is in fact the
same gesture that is supposed to be humanizing through the medium of its applied
implications. In a world that saturates itself with cronyistic ignoramuses the qualitative
fabric of civilization begins to falter. Anyone that actually retains a simple and slight
bearing on reality is able to confirm such a realization as an application of common
sense. The blatancy of this epiphany is supposed to be civilizing, but it is because it is
civilizing why we are driven away from it. The human condition deteriorates absolutely
whenever we adopt a cultural paradigm that is intoxicated with the infallibility of its
homogenous sociological mantra; that latter of which is often exploited from the top
down as a direct implication which signifies the characteristic source of sociological
cronyism.
Thus, the productions of human individuality are destroyed because the cultural
edifice that tries sanctioning such way of life on society is bent on uprooting and
destroying the quirks of our individuality simultaneously; that analogy produces a
duplicitous pun that exploits the fruits of human industry which is defined by what we
can produce on an individualized plain of existence. Once a person is beaten down to
absolutely nothing by the same institutions that are thought to protect a persons
intellectual integrity, there is no individuality left because the bottom line imperative will
focus exclusively on the eradication of it absolutely. There is a science, which will be left
deliberately undefined for purposes of further postulation, that goes into this process
and that describes the perpetuality of our enslavement as a species within our own
erected civilizations.

The Vocalization of Civilizational Literacy

A young and eager mind has no interest in the compartmentalization of thought
because the impetus of that gesture stifles the cultivation of it. A manifested idea is an
ideated one that depicts a simple yet complex process which describes the origins of all

forms of intellectual literacy. The one misfortune that we encounter is that humans have
this universal proclivity to exceptionalize themselves in the eyes of their immediate
peers. The process of thought ideation is something that comes natural to us because it
is the surest way to assert an individual identity. That is one of the many reasons why
an everyday person boasts an identity without really having one; hence, so much time
and effort is forced into the aesthetics of identity. The rude awakening which dawns on
us is that no matter how hard we try pleasing our surrounding superficial world the one
principle we seldom fathom is that each aesthetical strand is something of our own
interpretive making.
It becomes rather feasible to do away with imposed aesthetics because the
clause that goes into its actual assertion is made through habited arbitration which is
arbitrary in every sense of its conception. If someone is led to believe that the imposition
of identity surmises once we can prove its physicality we will have something to stand
for; at least in its ideological application. The problem with humanity is that we dwell on
threads and manifestations of asserted ideological sensuality when the essence of that
does nothing to sustain one simultaneously. The productions of ideated effort depict
those identities which cant be seen and that describes the most preferential way to
assert palates of civilizational civility.

The Darkened Mushroom Cloud of Sadism & its Pseudo Civility

A common desire for security ensures that we are able to procure peace of mind
while sizing up the competitive potential of our sociological peers. There is always the
power of comparative advantage and that has the mysterious tendency to lead to our
pathological demise over a graduated period of time. The greatest follow through that
goes into the psyche of the massified mind derives from impressions that individually
inflict a common sense of insecurity; someone must discover trite exoneration in order
to be recognized as normal in hopes of finding a concession of normalcy. Each epoch in
time has that factor as a matter of consequence; if we are to make sense of the times it
becomes absolutely necessary to partition ourselves from the institutionally trite
recognize as sociologically eccentric.
From there a consequence of perpetuality in the eyes of the human condition is
rifted into its own caveat of a chasm; for those of us that treat such a thing as a
sociological forewarning in the abstract, a genuine form of liberation is attained even
though it is inherently relative to the receptive beholder. The most pronounced form of
destitution arrives in the process that awakens us to it absolutely; it is for that reason
why so many shy away from it in fear of what they will find which is why many try to
internally nullify it outright. The sedation of mind describes the best way to inflict our

own downfall and that carries destructive potency that is indiscriminate in terms of its
inflicted ramifications. The rude awakening describes the source of a commonly held
insecurity that produces as much division as it does unification.
It all comes down to spectrums of the opposite end; there is always that alienated
minority that stands against the adversity of the majority and the source of sociological
sadism is a pristine byproduct of the latter.