TMP 83 F3
TMP 83 F3
),  hydrogen  peroxide  (H
2
O
2
)  and  hydroxyl
radicals  (
+
OH)  [5].   There  are  increasing  suggestions  by
considerable   evidence   that   the   free   radicals   induce
oxidative  damage  to  biomolecules  (lipids,   proteins  and
nucleic   acids),   the   damage   which   eventually   causes
atherosclerosis, ageing, cancer, diabetes mellitus, inflam-
mation,   AIDS   and   several   degenerative   diseases   in
humans  [6/10].
Several  methods  have  been  developed  to  measure  the
free radical scavenging capacity (RSC), regardless of the
individual   compounds   which   contribute   towards   the
total   capacity   of   a   plant   product   in   scavenging   free
radicals.   The   methods   are   typically   based   on   the
inhibition   of   the   accumulation   of   oxidized   products,
since the generation of free radical species is inhibited by
the   addition   of   antioxidants   and   this   gives   rise   to   a
reduction  of  the  end  point  by  scavenging  free  radicals.
The   reliable   method   to   determine   RSC  involves   the
* Corresponding  author.  Tel./fax: /82-42-520-5617
E-mail  address:   choicw@mail.pcu.ac.kr  (C.W.  Choi).
Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168
www.elsevier.com/locate/plantsci
0168-9452/02/$  -  see  front  matter # 2002  Published  by  Elsevier  Science  Ireland  Ltd.
PII:  S 0 1 6 8 - 9 4 5 2 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 3 3 2 - 1
measurement of the disappearance of free radicals, such
as   2,2?-azino-bis   (3-ethylbenzenthiazoline-6-sulphonic)
acid  radical  (ABTS
+
),  the  2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydra-
zyl   radical   (DPPH
+
)   or   other   colored  radicals,   with  a
spectrophotometer  [11,12].
Owing   to   the   increasing   demand   for   information
about   the  total   RSC  of   all   types   of   plant   extracts,   an
easy, rapid and reliable method for the determination of
RSC  of   various   samples   might   be  useful.   The  method
should  not  be  time-consuming,   but  sensitive  enough  to
screen  differences  between  plants  parts  used  for  herbal
medicine,   which   include   the   flower,   top,   aerial   and
roots.   In  this   paper,   assay-guided  comparison  among
plant   extracts   was   applied   to   evaluate   the   RSC   or
antioxidant   activity.   In  addition,   the   effects   of   flavo-
nol-type  (morin,   quercetin,   rutin),   flavonone-type  (nar-
ingenin)   and   flavanol-type   (catechin)   flavonoids   on
superoxide  anion  radical   generating  systems   were  also
compared.   Even  though  the   role   of   flavonoids   is   still
controversial, their antioxidant activity may be rendered
suitable  as  protective  agents  from  ROS-related  effects.
2.   Materials  and  methods
2.1.   Reagents
Catechin,   morin,   naringenin,   quercetin,   rutin,
DPPH
+
,   xanthine   oxidase,   xanthine,   nitrobluetetrazo-
lium  (NBT), FX174  RF1  DNA  and  thiobarbituric  acid
were   purchased  from  Sigma  Chemical   Co.   (St.   Louis,
MO).   Ethanol,   methanol,   dichloromethane,   ethyl   ace-
tate,   chloroform  and  toluene   of   analytical   grade  were
purchased  from  Merck  (Darmstadt,  Germany).
2.2.   Plant  materials  and  extracts
All   plants   were   collected  from  various   locations   in
Korea  and  naturally  dried.   Plants  were  extracted  with
ethanol,   dichloromethane  or  methanol   and  evaporated
to   dryness   under   reduced   pressure.   The   powdery   ex-
tracts  were  solubilized  in  ethanol   to  a  final   concentra-
tion  of  10  or  1.0  mg  ml
1
.
2.3.   Antioxidant  assays
2.3.1.   Superoxide anion generation by xanthine/xanthine
oxidase  assay
Superoxide  anions   were  generated  by  the  xanthine/
xanthine  oxidase  system  and  measured  by  the  slightly
modified   NBT   reduction   method   [13].   The   reaction
mixture   in  a  total   volume   of   1  ml   contained  50  mM
potassium  phosphate   buffer   (pH  7.8),   xanthine   (0.05
mM)   and  NBT  (0.6   mM).   Varying   concentrations   of
each plant extract or flavonoid, such as catechin, morin,
naringenin,   quercetin  and  rutin,   in  ethanol   was   added
into  the  mixture.   The  final   concentration  of  ethanol   in
the  reaction  mixture  did  not  exceed  1%  (v/v),   of  which
concentration  did  not  influence  the  activity  of  xanthine
oxidase.   The  reaction  was   initiated  by  the  addition  of
xanthine  oxidase  (25  mU  ml
1
)  in  the  same  phosphate
buffer. The reaction was run at room temperature for 10
min,   the   absorbance   (Ab)   of   formazan   chromophore
was   measured   against   a   blank   solution   in   which
xanthine   oxidase   was   replaced   by   buffer   solution.   A
control   solution   was   included,   in   which   sample   was
replaced  by  ethanol.
2.3.2.   Linoleic  acid  peroxidation  assay
The   reaction  mixture   contained  500  ml   linoleic   acid
(20  mM),   500  ml   Tris/HCl   (100  mM,   pH  7.5),   100  l
FeSO
4
+
7H
2
O  (4  mM)   and  a  varying  concentration  of
each  plant  extract  or  flavonoid.  Linoleic  acid  peroxida-
tion  was  initiated  by  the  addition  of  100 ml   of  ascorbic
acid   (2   mM),   incubated   for   30   min   at   37   8C   and
terminated   by   the   addition   of   trichloroacetic   acid
(5.5%).   Some  1  ml   of   the  mixture  was  added  with  250
ml  of  thiobarbituric  acid  in  50  mM  NaOH,  followed  by
heating  for   10  min.   The   mixtures   were   centrifuged  at
3500/g   for  10  min  and  the  absorbance  of   thiobarbi-
turic   acid-reacting   substances   (TBARS)   in  the   super-
natant   was   read   at   532   nm  and   converted   into   the
percentage   antioxidant   activity   using   the   following
equation:   linoleic   acid   peroxidation   inhibition   (%) /
(Ac/As) /100/(Ac/An);  Ac/Ab  of  control  (without
extract),   As/Ab   of   extract   and   An/Ab   of   blank
(without  extract  and  FeSO
4
+
7H
2
O).
2.3.3.   DPPH  photometric  assay
Each sample stock solution (1.0 mg ml
1
) was diluted
to  final   concentrations  of   500,   250,   100,   50  and  10 mg
ml
1
,   in  ethanol.   A  total   of  1  ml   of  a  0.3  mM  DPPH
ethanol solution was added to 2.5 ml of sample solution
of different concentrations and allowed to react at room
temperature. After 30 min, the Ab values were measured
at 518 nm and converted into the percentage antioxidant
activity   using   the   following   equation   described   pre-
viously   [14]:   scavenging   capacity   %/100/[(Ab   of
sample/Ab   of   blank)/100/Ab   of   control].   Ethanol
(1.0 ml) plus plant extract solution (2.5 ml) was used as a
blank,  while  DPPH  solution  plus  ethanol  was  used  as  a
negative   control.   The   positive   controls   were   DPPH
solution  plus   each  1  mM  flavonoid.   The   SC
50
  values
were  calculated  by  linear  regression  of  plots,   where  the
abscissa  represented  the   concentration  of   tested  plant
extracts   or   flavonoids   and   the   ordinate   the   average
percent  of  scavenging  capacity  from  three  replicates.
2.3.4.   Rapid  screening  of  antioxidant  by  dot-blot  and
DPPH  staining
An aliquot (3 ml) of each dilution of each plant extract
and  flavonoid  was  carefully  loaded  on  a  20/20  TLC
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168 1162
layer   (silica   gel   60   F
254
;   Merck)   and  allowed  to  dry.
Drops of each sample were loaded in order of decreasing
concentration   along   the   column.   The   staining   of   the
silica plate was based on the procedure of Soler-Rivas et
al.   [15].   The   sheet   bearing   the   dry   spots   was   placed
upside  down  for   10  s   in  a  0.4  mM  DPPH  solution  in
methanol.   Stained  silica  layer   revealed  a  purple  back-
ground  with  yellow  spots  at   the  location  of   the  drops,
which  showed  radical  scavenger  capacity.   The  intensity
of the yellow color depends upon the amount and nature
of  radical  scavenger  present  in  the  sample.
2.3.5.   TLC  analysis  and  DPPH  staining
Drops (3 ml) of each stock solution from plant extracts
(1  or   10  mg  ml
1
)   were   loaded  individually  onto  the
baseline   of   the   layer,   which  was   then  developed  with
toluene:   ethyl   acetate   (93:7,   v/v)   or   chloroform/ethyl
acetate   (60:40,   v/v)   depending  upon  the   samples.   The
layer   was   dried   and  stained  with  DPPH  solution,   as
mentioned  above.
2.3.6.   DNA  strand  scission  by  hydroxyl  radicals
DNA   strand   breakage   by   hydroxyl   radicals   was
measured   by   agarose   gel   electrophoresis.   The   assay
was   based   on   the   conversion   of   supercoiled   FX174
RF1   double-strand  DNA  to  open  circular   and  linear
forms   by   the   DNA  damaging   agents.   The   standard
reaction  mixture   (20  ml)   contained  TE  (10  mM  Tris/
HCl   and  1  mM  EDTA,   pH  8.0),   FX174  RF1  super-
coiled  DNA  (0.5 mg)  and  hydrogen  peroxide  (20  mM).
Hydroxyl   radical   was   generated  by   UV  photolysis   of
hydrogen  peroxide  under   transilluminator.   After   incu-
bation  at   room  temperature   for   15  min,   the   mixtures
were   electrophoresed   at   100   V.   The   gels   were   then
stained  with  ethidium  bromide  and  photographed  on  a
transilluminator.
3.   Results  and  discussion
It   has  long  been  recognized  that   naturally  occurring
substances   in  higher   plants   have   antioxidant   activity.
Among  those  substances,   the  flavonoids  widely  distrib-
uted  in  plants  have  the  ability  to  scavenge  free  radicals,
superoxide   and   hydroxyl   radicals   by   single-electron
transfer.   In   our   experiments,   we   measured   the   total
antioxidation   effect   of   some   medicinal   plants   and
compared  them  with  that  of  flavonoids.  Because  of  the
complex   nature   of   phytochemicals,   the   antioxidant
activities  of  plant  extracts  cannot  be  evaluated  by  only
a  single  method.  Therefore,  commonly  accepted  assays,
including  enzymatic  and  non-enzymatic  methods,   were
employed   to  evaluate   the   total   antioxidant   effects   of
some  medicinal   plants  in  Korea.   The  results  should  be
encouraged   in   future   in   vivo   studies,   which   could
ultimately   lead   to   the   application   of   these   medicinal
plants  in  pharmaceutical  and  cosmetic  formulations.
3.1.   Xanthine/xanthine  oxidase  assay
In  a  preliminary  experiment,   the  extraction  either  by
ethanol   or   dichloromethane   was   more   efficient   in
antioxidant  assay  and  RSC  than  that  by  methanol,  but
for  the  uniform  assay  we  selected  the  plant  extracts  by
dichloromethane.  Table  1 reports  the  IC
50
 of  xanthine/
xanthine oxidase activity, IC
50
 of linoleic acid peroxida-
tion and SC
50
 values of DPPH for selected plant extracts
and  flavonoids.   Xanthine   oxidase   catalyses   the  oxida-
tion of hypoxanthine or xanthine to uric acid, during the
oxidation   an   equivalent   rate   of   superoxide   radical   is
produced [16]. The following reaction is the oxidation of
NBT   to   water-soluble   formazan   by   the   superoxide
formed   from  xanthine   by   xanthine   oxidase.   Among
plant   extracts,   maximum  inhibition  of   NBT  reduction
by   the   root   bark  extract   of   Morus   alba   was   steadily
reached  at   100 mg  ml
1
(Fig.   1A),   though  its  value  of
IC
50
 is more than that of quercetin and less than those of
catechin, morin, naringenin and rutin. Minimum inhibi-
tion   of   NBT  reduction   by   the   root   extract   of   Poly-
gonatum  odoratum,   but   its   value  of   IC
50
  is   still   lower
than   that   of   rutin.   All   tested   flavonoids   and   plant
extracts   inhibited  the  formation  of   reduced  NBT  in  a
dose-related  manner  (Fig.  1A,  B),  as  has  been  reported
for  some  flavonoids  [17,18].  In  our  experiment,  querce-
tin and morin were more efficient than other flavonoids,
while  rutin  was  the  least   for  inhibition  of   NBT  reduc-
tion.
We   have   previously   reported   on   the   influence   of
flavonoids on the toxicity of copper to plant pathogenic
fungi [19,20]. Quercetin and morin conferred substantial
protection  against   the   inhibition  of   fungal   growth  by
copper,   whereas   naringenin   and   rutin   offered   less
effective protection, suggesting that the protection effect
of   the   flavonoids   is   highly   dependent   on   the   keto
function  and  hydroxyl   group  substitution  of   the  flavo-
noid  skeleton.   Likewise,   the  result  of  the  present  study
indicates that the antioxidant activity of flavonoids may
be   correlated  to  their   structure   [16,21],   such  as   3?,4?-
dihydroxy  system  of   the  B-ring  in  quercetin  and  2?,4?-
dihydroxy  system  of  the  B-ring  in  morin  [22].
During   the   oxidation   of   xanthine   to   uric   acid,   its
inhibition  can  also  be  detected  by  a  decreased  produc-
tion  of  uric  acid.   A  xanthine  oxidase  inhibitor  without
any  additional   superoxide  scavenging  activity  will   pro-
duce  the  reduction  in  the  rate  of   NBT.   In  fact,   many
flavonoids have been reported to be potent inhibitors of
xanthine   oxidase   rather   than   scavenging   superoxide
anions  [18,23].   In  particular,   catechin  and  rutin  having
a  4-oxo  function  significantly  inhibited  uric  acid  forma-
tion,   competing  with  the  xanthine  for  the  active  site  of
xanthine  oxidase  [18].   Therefore,   the  potential   antiox-
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168   1163
idant   activities   of   plant   extracts   and  flavonoids   were
additionally  measured  with  the  following  assays.
3.2.   Linoleic  acid  peroxidation  and  DPPH
spectrophotometric  assays
The   inhibition   of   linoleic   acid   peroxidation   was
assayed   by   the   TBARS   test.   All   tested   flavonoids
showed   a   dose-dependent   inhibition   of   linoleic   acid
peroxidation  (data  not  shown)  and  among  those,   rutin
was   the  most   efficient   by  the  lowest   IC
50
  value,   while
naringenin  was   the  least   efficient   (Table   1),   the  result
was similar to previous report [18]. It is noteworthy that
the   leaf   extracts   of   Saururi   herba  (Saururus   chinensis
(Lour)   Baill)   produced   the   best   inhibitory   effect   of
linoleic  acid  peroxidation  among  plant   extracts,   which
was   also   very   active   to   inhibit   xanthine/xanthine
oxidase  reaction  and  to  scavenge  DPPH  free  radicals.
Unlike   DPPH  assay,   the   inhibition   of   linoleic   acid
peroxidation  by  plant   extracts   is   much  more   effective
than that in the range of pure flavonoids. Because of the
presence   of   various   other   phytochemicals,   such   as
phenolic  compounds,   amino  acids,   ascorbic  acid,   toco-
pherols   and   pigments,   that   might   contribute   some
antioxidant  activity  singly  or  in  combination.
In  order  to  verify  the  additional   scavenging  activity,
the   RSC   of   tested   samples   were   measured   spectro-
photometrically with DPPH, a stable free radical, which
produce a  violet  solution  in  ethanol.  It  is  reduced  in  the
presence  of   an  antioxidant   molecule,   giving  rise  to  no
color,   which  has  been  used  to  evaluate  the  antioxidant
activity   of   plant   and   microbial   extracts   [14,24/26].
When   each   plant   extract   was   examined   using   stable
DPPH  radicals,   all   extracts  exhibited  the  various  RSC.
Among those, the root bark extracts of M. alba  showed
the  most  scavenging  by  the  lowest  value  of  SC
50
  and  a
dose-dependent   manner   in  DPPH  assay  (Table   1  and
Fig.  2A).
The  RSC  of  flavonoids  was  tested  by  their  ability  to
bleach  the  stable  DPPH  radical,   as  previously  reported
[18,27].   During  the  assay,   the  reaction  was  very  stable,
producing   reliable   values   in   repeated   tests   because
Table  1
Inhibitory  activity  of  xanthine  oxidation  and  linoleic  acid  peroxidation  and  scavenging  capacity  of  DPPH  by  plant  extracts  and  avonoids
Plant  extracts  and  flavonoids   Xanthine  oxidase   Linoleic  acid  peroxidation   DPPH
I  (%)
a
IC
50
b
I  (%)
a
IC
50
b
S  (%)
a
SC
50
b
Astragali  membranaceus   72.1   59.2   100   15.3   16.9   1,152.1
Houttuynia  cordata   92.1   15.5   100   6.5   30.1   434.8
Morus  alba   100   5.9   100   15.0   55.4   90.3
Polygonatum  odoratum   50.8   90.9   100   9.5   25.4   493.1
Saururus  chinensis   85.7   25   100   6.2   34.7   216.6
Catechin   100   23.3   70.9   62.3   100   4.8
Morin   100   8.6   56.5   84.5   100   12.2
Naringenin   100   20.3   53.0   98.4   
c
481.3
Quercetin   100   0.9   82.5   63.1   100   8.1
Rutin   42.9   116.6   63.7   59.7   95.5   18.7
a
Percent  of  inhibition  and  scavenging  at  100 mg  ml
1
as  a  mean  of  triplicate  experiments.
b
Values obtained from regression lines with 95% of confidence level. IC
50
 is defined as the concentration sufficient to obtain 50% of a maximum
inhibition  and  SC
50
  is  defined  as  the  concentration  sufficient  to  obtain  50%  of  a  maximum  scavenging  capacity.
c
Negative  data.
Fig. 1.   Xanthine/xanthine oxidase inhibition activity of plant extracts
(A); Astragali membranaceus  root (white bar), Houttuynia cordata  leaf
(light grey bar), Morus alba  root (checker bar), Polygonatum odoratum
root (dark grey bar), Saururus chinensis  leaf (black bar) and avonoids
(B);   catechin  (white  bar),   morin  (light  grey  bar),   naringenin  (checker
bar),  quercetin  (dark  grey  bar),  rutin  (black  bar).  Values  are  mean  of
triplicate  analysis.
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168 1164
DPPH   containing   an   odd   electron   gives   a   strong
absorption  at  518  nm  in  visible  spectrophotometer.   As
this electron becomes paired off in the presence of a free
radical scavenger, the absorption fades and the resulting
decolorization   is   stoichiometric   with   respect   to   the
number   of   electrons   taken  up  [28].   Except   for   narin-
genin,   all   tested   flavonoids   showed   a   significant   and
dose-dependent   DPPH   scavenging   capacity,   among
those   catechin   was   the   most   efficient   by   the   lowest
SC
50
  value.   When  a  range   of   concentration  of   narin-
genin,  similar  to  other  flavonoids,  was  treated  the  value
was always negative. Its SC
50
 among flavonoids was the
most,   even  100  times   more   than  that   of   catechin.   We
obtained  a  range  of  DPPH  scavenging  capacity  of  17/
77%  when   naringenin   was   treated   at   an   increasing
concentration  from  150  mg  ml
1
through  1  mg  ml
1
.
In  addition,   its   reaction  time  with  DPPH  took  a  long
time,   observing   the   fading   purple   color   visibly.   The
interaction   of   a   potential   antioxidant   with   DPPH
depends  on  its  structural   conformation  and  this  struc-
tural   requirement   is   correlated   with   the   presence   of
hydroxyl  groups  on  the  flavonoids  [17,29,30].
3.3.   Rapid  screening  of  antioxidant  by  dot-blot  and
DPPH  staining
In  order   to  visualize   quantitatively  the   RSC  of   the
tested  samples,   measured  spectrophotometrically,   were
detected in the TLC by the DPPH staining method. For
the   rapid  screening  of   RSC,   each  diluted  sample   was
applied  as  a  dot  on  a  TLC  layer  that  was  later  stained
with  DPPH  solution  (Fig.  3).  The  appearance  of  yellow
color  in  the  spots  has  a  potential   value  for  the  indirect
evaluation of the RSC of the dot samples [15,31,32]. The
method   is   typically   based   on   the   inhibition   of   the
accumulation  of oxidized products, since  the  generation
of   free  radicals   is   inhibited  by  the  addition  of   antiox-
idants  and  the  end  point  by  scavenging  the  free  radical.
When   flavonoids   were   analyzed,   fast-reacted   and
strong  intensities  of  white-yellow  spots  appeared  up  to
dilutions   of   100  mg  ml
1
of   catechin,   naringenin  and
rutin  (final   concentration  300  ng)   and  50  mg  ml
1
of
morin   and   quercetin.   However,   initially   faint   spots
appeared  and  several   hours  later,   weak  spots  could  be
observed  in  naringenin-loaded,   similar  to  the  result   of
DPPH  spectrophotometric   assay.   It   explains   why   we
had the negative result of DPPH scavenging capacity by
naringenin   in   spectrophotometric   assay,   measured   10
min   after   reaction.   Appropriate   dilutions   of   plant
extracts   also   gave   a   positive   reaction   with   DPPH,
depending   on   their   RSC   and   nature.   Among   plant
extracts,   the  extracts  from  the  root  of  M.   alba  and  the
leaf   of   Saururi   herba   were   stronger   in   the   RSC,
detecting  up  to  1  mg  ml
1
dilution  (final  concentration
3   mg).   Leaf   extracts   of   Houttuynia   cordata   showed
intermediate   RSC,   while   root   extracts   of   Astragali
membranaceus   and  P.   odoratum,   respectively,   showed
weak RSC by fading color intensity similar to the purple
Fig.   2.   DPPH  radical   scavenging  capacity  of  (A);   Astragali   membra-
naceus   root   (white   bar),   Houttuynia   cordata   leaf   (light   grey   bar),
Morus alba  root (checker bar), Polygonatum odoratum  root (dark grey
bar),   Saururus  chinensis   leaf  (black  bar)  and  avonoids  (B);   catechin
(white bar), morin (light grey bar), naringenin (checker bar), quercetin
(dark   grey   bar),   rutin   (black   bar).   Values   are   mean   of   triplicate
analysis.
Fig.  3.   Dot  blot  assay  of  RSC  on  a  silica  sheet  stained  with  a  DPPH
solution  in  methanol.   Each  3  ml   dilution  of   avonoid  (2  and  1  mg
ml
1
, 500, 250, 100 and 50 ml ml
1
) and plant extract (10, 5, 2.5 and 1
mg  ml
1
,  500  and  100 ml  ml
1
)  applied  from  top  to  down.  From  left
to   right   dots   are   (avonoids):   catechin   (1),   morin   (2),   rutin   (3),
naringenin  (4),   quercetin  (5),   (plant   extracts):   Morus   alba   root   (6),
Saururus   chinensis   leaf   (7),   Houttuynia   cordata   leaf   (8),   Astragali
membranaceus   root  (9)  and  Polygonatum  odoratum  root  (10).
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168   1165
background  (Fig.  1).  According  to  color  intensities,  the
overall   order   of   the   decreasing   RSC  was   M.   alba /
Saururus   chinensis /H.   cordata/P.   odoratum/A.
membranaceus.   These  results   correspond  to  the  results
by  DPPH  spectrophotometric  assay.
3.4.   TLC  analysis  with  DPPH  staining
For   the   qualitative   detection   of   RSC  in   the   plant
extracts,   the   same   procedures   on   TLC   layer   were
applied  as   mentioned  above   except   developing  in  two
solvent  systems  (Table  2  and  Fig.   4A,   B).   As  expected,
both  extracts   of   M.   alba   and  Saururi   herba  show  the
numerous   migrated  spots   having  strong  intensities   on
TLC   plate   that   developed   on   toluene/ethyl   acetate
solvent  (Fig.  4A).  The  number  of  white  spots  and  their
migration were various among plant extracts, depending
on TLC solvent system. As presented in Fig. 4(B), other
plant   extracts   developed   on   different   organic   solvent
system  showed  the   clear   differences   in  the   number   of
spots.  Fruit peel extract from  Citrus  unshiu  (lanes 1 and
2) and root extract from Platycodon grandiflorum  (lanes
3  and  4),  which  developed  on  chloroform/ethyl  acetate
(lanes 1 and 3) showed more migrating spots than single
spot  without  migration  in  toluene/ethyl   acetate  system
(lanes  2  and  4).  Their  intensity  and  reaction  speed  were
also  various,   suggesting  that   spots  may  contain  indivi-
dually  different  characteristics  (Table  2),  some  of  which
have   a   fast   RSC,   reducing   the   DPPH  radical   very
rapidly, while others have a slower RSC, taking a longer
time  to  react.   Antioxidants  of  several   plant  extracts  do
not   all   operate   in   the   same   way   and   maybe   more
effective  against  different  free  radicals.
3.5.   DNA  strand  scission  by  hydroxyl  radicals
The   oxidation  of   DNA  bases   is   produced  by  ROS,
generated   both   from  endogenous   sources   and   from
reactions   of   xenobiotics   [33,34].   The   cells   possess
efficient   DNA  repair   mechanisms   for   oxidative   DNA
damage  [35,36],  but  damaged  forms  of  DNA  oxidation
is   persistent   during   replication   of   DNA,   leading   to
mutation.   Fig.   5  shows   the   electrophoretic   pattern  of
DNA  after   UV-photolysis   of   H
2
O
2
  in  the  presence  of
flavonoids  or  plant   extracts.   DNA  strand  scission  was
assessed   by   measuring   the   conversion   of   supercoiled
DNA  to  open  circular   and  further   to  linear   forms   by
flavonoid   [18]   and   extracts   from  Citrus   species   and
Ganoderma  lucidum  [37,38].   DNA  derived  from FX174
supercoiled  double  strand  DNA  showed  two  bands  on
agarose   gel   electrophoresis,   the   faster-migrating   band
corresponding to the native form of supercoiled circular
DNA (scDNA) and the slower-migrating band being the
open  circular   form  (ocDNA).   The   UV  irradiation  of
DNA  in  the  presence  of   H
2
O
2
  caused  the  cleavage  of
supercoiled  DNA,  indicating  that  OH  generated  by  UV
photolysis  of  H
2
O
2
  produced  DNA  strand  scission  and
breakage.   Neither   hydrogen   peroxide   nor   UV  alone
Table  2
DPPH  scavenging  capacity  of  extracts  from  various  plant  parts  by  DPPH  staining
Plant   Part   Number  of  spots   Reaction  speed   Intensity  of  spots
c
Astragali  membranaceus
a
Root   1   Slow   
Capsicum  annuum
b
Green  fruit   1   Fast   
Yellow  fruit   1   Fast   
Red  fruit   1   Fast   
Carthamus  tinctorius
b
Seed   1   Fast   
Chrysanthemum  coronarium
b
Leaves   2   Fast   , 
Cichorium  intybus
b
Leaves   1   Fast   
Citrus  unshiu
b
Fruit  peel   4   Fast   All 
Dioscorea  batatas
b
Root   1   Fast   
Epimedium  koreanum
b
Leaf   1   Fast   
Houttuynia  cordata
a
Leaf   1   Fast   
Morus  alba
a
Root  bark   5   Fast   All 
Platycodon  grandiflorum
b
Root   3   Fast   2 ,  1 
Polygonatum  odoratum
a
Root   1   Slow   
Saururus  chinensis
a
Leaf   3   Fast   All 
Catechin   1   Fast   
Morin   1   Fast   
Naringenin   1   Slow   
Quercetin   1   Fast   
Rutin   1   Fast   
a
Various  ethanol  extracts  from  Korean  ethnophamaceutical  plants  loaded  onto  TLC  plate,  developing  by  toluene/ethyl  acetate  (93:7,  v/v).
b
Various ethanol extracts from Korean ethnophamaceutical plants loaded onto TLC plate, developing by  chloroform/ethyl acetate (60:40,  v/v)
and  staining  by  DPPH.
c
,  Weak; ,  intermediate; ,  strong.
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168 1166
induced  any DNA  damage  (Fig. 5A,  lanes 1 and 2),  but
their  combination  of   both  resulted  in  almost   complete
destruction  of   supercoiled  form  of   phage  DNA  under
our  experimental  condition  (lane  3).  The  presence  of  all
flavonoids under investigation suppressed the formation
of   linear   DNA  (linDNA)   and  protected  from  damage
(lanes 4/8). Both extracts of M. alba  and Saururi herba
seemed   more   efficiently   protected  FX174   supercoiled
double   strand   DNA   from   hydroxyl   radical-induced
strand   scission   (Fig.   5B).   In   particular,   when   50   mg
ml
1
extracts   of   Saururi   herba  was   treated,   we  could
observe  three  forms  of  DNA  resulting  from  scDNA  to
ocDNA  and  linDNA.   In  the  presence  of  an  increasing
concentration  of  extracts  of  both  plants,  the  proportion
of both the ocDNA and linDNA significantly decreased
while   the   amounts   of   the   residual   supercoiled   DNA
recovered  (Fig.   5B,   lanes  1/3  and  5/7).   Unexpectedly,
we  could  not  observe  the  band  on  the  gel  when  treated
concentration   at   400   mg   ml
1
of   each   extract.   Our
assumption for this is that probably a higher concentra-
tion  of   extracts   may  disturb  the  DNA  migration.   The
DNA  cleavage   analysis   also  demonstrated  the   consis-
tently  strong  antioxidant   properties   of   extracts   of   M.
alba  and  Saururi  herba  used  in  traditional  medicine.
Acknowledgements
This   research  was   supported  by  a  grant   (R12-1999-
002103-0)  from  MOST  and  KOSEF  of  Korea  through
the Research Center for Biomedicinal Resources (RRC).
References
[1]   R.A. Larson, The antioxidants of higher plants, Phytochemistry 4
(1988)  969/978.
[2]   M.G.L.   Hertog,   P.C.H.   Hollman,   M.B.   Katan,   Content   of
potentially   anticarcinogenic   avonoids   of   28   vegetables   and   9
fruits   commonly   consumed  in  the   Nederlands,   J.   Agric.   Food
Chem.  40  (1992)  2379/2383.
[3]   G.   Cao,   E.   Soc,   R.L.   Prior,   Antioxidant   capacity  of   tea  and
common  vegetables,  J.  Agric.  Food  Chem.  44  (1996)  3426/3431.
[4]   G.A.A. Kivits, F.J.P. Vam der Sman, L.B.M. Tijburg, Analysis of
catechin  from  green   and   black   tea   in   humans:   a   specic   and
sensitive  colorimetric  assay  of  total  catechins  in  biological  uids,
Int.  J.  Food  Sci.  Nutr.  48  (1997)  387/392.
[5]   M.B.   Grisham,   J.M.   McCord,   Chemistry   and  cytotoxicities   of
reactive oxygen metabolites, in: A.E. Taylor, S. Matalon, P. Ward
(Eds.),   Biology   of   Oxygen   Radicals,   American   Physiological
Society,  Bethesda,  1986,  pp.  1/18.
[6]   B.   Halliwell,   Free   radicals,   antioxidants,   and   human   disease:
curiosity,  cause,  or  consequence?,  Lancet  344  (1994)  721/724.
Fig.   4.   Thin  layer   chromatography  of   plant   extracts   stained  with  a
DPPH  solution.   (A)   The  samples  from  left   to  right   were  extracts  of
Morus   alba   root   bark   (lane   1),   Saururus   chinensis   leaf   (lane   2),
Houttuynia cordata  leaf (lane 3), Astragali membranaceus  root (lane 4)
and  Polygonatum odoratum  root (lane  5),  developed  on  toluene/ethyl
acetate   (93:7,   v/v).   (B)   The   extracts   developed  on  different   organic
solvent  system  show  the  differences  in  the  number  of  spots  and  their
migration. Fruit peel extract from citrus (lane 1 and 2) and root extract
from   Platycodon   grandiorum   (lane   3   and   4),   developed   on
chloroform/ethyl   acetate  (lanes   1  and  3)   show  migrating  spots   but
no  migration  in  toluene/ethyl  acetate  (lanes  2  and  4).
Fig.   5.   Effects  of   avonoids  and  plant   extracts  on  the  protection  of
DNA  strand  scission  induced  by  H
2
O
2
  plus  UV.   (A)   Some  0.4  mM
each  avonoid  treated: FX174  RF  supercoiled  DNA  (concentration:
0.5 ug per lane) was exposed at 20 mM H
2
O
2
 alone (lane 1), UV alone
(lane   2),   H
2
O
2
/UV   (lane   3),   catechin/H
2
O
2
/UV   (lane   4),
naringenin/H
2
O
2
/UV  (lane  5),   morin/H
2
O
2
/UV  (lane  6),   quer-
cetin/H
2
O
2
/UV  (lane  7),   rutin/H
2
O
2
/UV  (lane  8)  and  M  (Mar-
ker).   Some   0.4   mM  each   avonoid.   (B)   Extracts:   lane   1:   DNA/
Saururus   chinensis   50   mg   ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV;   2:   DNA/Saururus
chinensis   100   mg   ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV;   3:   DNA/Saururus   chinensis
200   mg   ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV;   4:   DNA/Saururus   chinensis   400   mg
ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV;   5:   DNA/Morus  alba   50 mg  ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV;
6:   DNA/Morus   alba   100  mg   ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV;   7:   DNA/Morus
alba  200 mg ml
1
/H
2
O
2
/UV; 8: DNA/Morus alba  400 mg ml
1
/
H
2
O
2
/UV.
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168   1167
[7]   J.J.  Pincemail,  Free  radicals  and  antioxidants  in  human  diseases,
in:  A.E.  Favier,  J.  Cadet,  B.  Kalyanaraman,  M.  Fontecave,  J.-L.
Pierre   (Eds.),   Analysis   of   Free   Radicals   in  Biological   Systems,
Birkhauser  Verlag,  Berlin,  1995,  pp.  83/98.
[8]   D.   Dreher,   A.F.   Junod,   Role  of   oxygen  free  radicals   in  cancer
development,  Eur.  J.  Cancer  32A  (1996)  30/38.
[9]   T.D. Oberley, L.W. Oberley, Antioxidant enzyme levels in cancer,
Histol.  Histopathol.  12  (1997)  525/535.
[10]   S.   Maxwell,   Anti-oxidant   therapy:   does   it   have   a   role   in   the
treatment  of  human  disease?,   Exp.   Opin.   Invest.   Drugs  6  (1997)
211/236.
[11]   N.J. Miller, C.A. Rice-Evans, Factors inuencing the antioxidant
activity determined by the ABTS radical cation assay, Free Radic.
Res.  26  (1997)  195/199.
[12]   C.   Sanchez-Moreno,   J.A.   Larrauri,   F.   Saura-Calixto,   A  proce-
dure  to  measure  the  antiradical   efciency  of  polyphenols,   J.   Sci.
Food  Agric.  76  (1998)  270/276.
[13]   W.S.   Chang,   Y.H.   Chang,   F.J.   Lu,   H.C.   Chiang,   Inhibitory
effects   of   phenolics   on   xanthine   oxidase,   Anticancer   Res.   14
(1994)  501/506.
[14]   L.L.   Mensor,   F.S.   Menezes,   G.G.   Leitao,   A.S.   Reis,   T.C.   dos
Santos,   C.S.   Coube,   S.G.   Leitao,   Screening   of   Brazilian  plant
extracts  for  antioxidant  activity  by  the  use  of  DPPH  free  radical
method,  Phytother.  Res.  15  (2001)  127/130.
[15]   C.   Soler-Rivas,   J.   Carlos  Esp n,   H.J.   Wichers,   An  easy  and  fast
test to compare total free radical scavenger capacity of foodstuffs,
Phytochem.  Anal.  11  (2000)  330/338.
[16]   P. Cos, L. Ying, M. Calomme, J.P. Hu, K. Cimanga, B. Van Poel,
L.   Pieters,   A.J.   Vlietibck,   D.   Vanden  Berghe,   Structure/activity
relationship   and   classication   of   avonoids   as   inhibitors   of
xanthine/oxidase   and  superoxide   scavengers,   J.   Nat.   Prod.   61
(1998)  71/76.
[17]   N.   Cotelle,   J.L.   Bernier,   J.P.   Catteau,   J.   Pommery,   J.C.   Wallet,
E.M.   Gaydou,   Antioxidant   properties   of   hydroxy-avonones,
Free  Radic.  Biol.  Med.  21  (1996)  35/43.
[18]   A.   Russo,   R.   Acquaviva,   A.   Campisi,   V.   Sorrenti,   C.   Di
Giacomo, G. Virgata, M.L. Barcellona, A. Vanella, Bioavonoids
as  antiradicals,   antioxidants  and  DNA  cleavage  protectors,   Cell
Biol.  Toxicol.  16  (2000)  91/98.
[19]   S.H.   Park,   C.W.   Choi,   K.-S.   Lee,   C.-J.   Kim,   Inuence   of
quercetin,   a  bioavonoid,   on  the  toxicity  of  copper  to  Fusarium
culmorum,  Lett.  Appl.  Microbiol.  26  (1998)  363/366.
[20]   S.H.   Park,   O.S.   Kwon,   C.W.   Choi,   C.-J.   Kim,   Comparative
inuence   of   avonoids   on  the   toxicity  of   copper   to  Alternaria
alternata,  J.  Phytopathol.  148  (2000)  597/599.
[21]   G.   Cao,   E.   Soc,   R.L.   Prior,   Antioxidant   and   prooxidant
behavior   of   avonoids:   structure/activity   relationships,   Free
Radic.  Biol.  Med.  22  (1997)  749/760.
[22]   J.B. Harborne, The avonoids, in: J.B. Harborne (Ed.), Advances
in  Research  Since  1986,  Chapman  and  Hall,  London,  UK,  1994.
[23]   L. Selloum, S. Reichl, M. Mu ller, L. Sebihi, J. Arnhold, Effects of
avonols   on   the   generation   of   superoxide   anion   radicals   by
xanthine   oxidase   and   stimulated   neutrophils,   Arch.   Biochem.
Biophys.  395  (2001)  49/56.
[24]   F.N.   Ko,   Z.J.   Cheng,   C.N.   Lin,   C.H.   Teng,   Scavenger   and
antioxidant properties of prenylavones isolated from Artocarpus
heterophyllus ,  Free  Radic.  Biol.  Med.  25  (1998)  160/168.
[25]   J.A.   Larrauri,   C.   Sanchez-Moreno,   F.   Saura-Calixto,   Effect   of
temperature   on  the   free   radical   scavenging   capacity  of   extract
from red and white grape pomace peels, J. Agric. Food Chem. 46
(1998)  2694/2697.
[26]   C. Hu, D.D. Kitts, Antioxidant activity of Echinacea root extract,
J.  Agric.  Food  Chem.  48  (2000)  1466/1472.
[27]   A.K. Ratty, J. Sunamoto, N.P. Das, Interaction of avonols with
1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl  free  radical.  Liposomal membranes
and   soybean   lipoxygenase-1,   Biochem.   Pharmacol.   37   (1988)
989/995.
[28]   W. Brand-Williams,  M.E.  Cuvelier,  C.  Berset,  Use  of  free  radical
method  to  evaluate  antioxidant  activity,   Lebensm-Wiss  A-Tech-
nol.  28  (1995)  25/30.
[29]   F.   Nanjo,   K.   Goto,   R.   Seto,   M.   Suzuki,   M.   Sakai,   Y.   Hara,
Scavenging  effects  of   tea  catechins  and  their  derivatives  on  1,1-
diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl   radical,   Free   Radic.   Biol.   Med.   21
(1996)  895/902.
[30]   B.   Fauconneau,   P.   Waffo   Teguo,   F.   Huguet,   L.   Barrier,   A.
Decendit,  J.M.  Merillon,  Comparative  study of  radical scavenger
and  antioxidant   properties   of   phenolic   compounds   from  Vitis
vinifera  cell cultures using in vitro tests, Life Sci. 61 (1997) 2103/
2110.
[31]   F.A.   Thomas-Barberan,   M.I.   Gil,   M.   Castan er,   F.   Artes,   M.E.
Saltveit,   Effect   of   selected   browning   inhibitors   on   phenolic
metabolism  in  stem  tissue   of   harvested  lettuce,   J.   Agric.   Food
Chem.  45  (1997)  583/589.
[32]   C.  Garcia-Viguera,  P.  Zafrilla,  F.  Romero,  P.  Abellan,  F.  Artes,
F.A.   Tomas-Barberan,   Colour   stability   of   strawberry   jam  as
affected  by   cultivar   and  storage   temperature,   J.   Food  Sci.   64
(1999)  243/247.
[33]   B.   Halliwell,   O.I.   Aruoma,   DNA  damage   by   oxygen-derived
species:  its  mechanism  and  measurement  in  mammalian  systems,
FEBS  Lett.  281  (1991)  9/19.
[34]   M.   Dizdaroglu,   Oxidative   damage   to   DNA   in   mammalian
chromatin,  Mutat.  Res.  275  (1992)  331/342.
[35]   M.S.   Satoh,   T.   Lindahl,   Enzymatic   repair   of   oxidative   DNA
damage,  Cancer  Res.  54  (1994)  1899/1901.
[36]   T.  Lindahl,  R.D.  Wood,  Quality control by  DNA repair,  Science
286  (1999)  1897/1905.
[37]   J.-M. Lee, H. Kwon, H. Jeong, J.W. Lee, S.Y. Lee, S.J. Baek, Y.-
J.   Surh,   Inhibition   of   lipid   peroxidation   and   oxidative   DNA
damage  by  Ganoderma  lucidum,   Phytother.   Res.   15  (2001)  245/
249.
[38]   G. Attaguile, A. Russo, A. Campisi, F. Savoca, R. Acquaviva, N.
Ragusa,  A.  Vanella, Antioxidant activity and protective  effect on
DNA  cleavage   of   extracts   from  Citrus   incanus   L.   and   Citrus
monspeliensis   L,  Cell  Biol.  Toxicol.  16  (2000)  83/90.
C.W.  Choi  et  al.  /  Plant  Science  163  (2002)  1161/1168 1168