Technicalreport Alcoholtechnology PDF
Technicalreport Alcoholtechnology PDF
Technicalreport Alcoholtechnology PDF
24 26
26
733
7
ALCOHOL TECHNOLOGY
The department provides guidance to alcohol
industry for achieving maximum productivity,
efficiency and yield from different feedstocks and
also to enhance the quality of finished products
viz. rectified spirit, extra neutral alcohol and
ethanol. The department is also engaged in research
in the areas of water conservation in distilleries for
achieving zero liquid discharge of effluent
generated. The consultancy and inspection of
ongoing projects, proposed molasses and nonmolasses based distilleries and distillery effluent
treatment projects are the integral assignments of
the department. Government agencies at the central
and state level department seek technical inputs
and advice from the department. A publication on
Technical Performance of Distilleries affiliated to
co-operative sugar mills of Maharashtra State is also
brought out annually.
74
Table 27 : TOVA and free sulphur dioxide content in analyzed molasses samples
Name of mill
TOVA by Conventional
method (ppm)
3770
4113
4456
6513
8570
4713
5056
5142
5056
5142
5313
5741
5999
5999
6513
7884
6341
10541
4884
5056
420
690
450
790
774
490
700
660
620
610
680
670
720
680
700
720
780
940
650
510
Manganga SSK
Dnyaneshwar SSK
Ajinkyatara SSK
Ajinkyatara SSK
Ajinkyatara SSK
Kopargaon SSK
Bhaurao Chavan SSK
Bhaurao Chavan SSK
Majalgaon SSK
Siddheshwar SSK, Kumthe
Vitthalrao Shinde SSK
Sant Tukaram SSK
Nira-Bhima SSK
Satpuda Tapi SSK
Ashok SSK
Gangakhed Sugars & Energy Ltd
Doodhganga Krishna SSKN
Parry Sugars Ltd
Parry Sugars Ltd
Malprabha SSK
This method was tested repeatedly with different
molasses samples. The method gave consistent and
reproducible results. Further experiments will be
conducted to investigate the effect of individual
volatile acids (such as acetic, butyric, propionic
acids etc.) as well as free sulfur dioxide on the
activity of yeast and fermentation process. Further
studies are also planned in association with the
department of sugar technology to control the sulfur
dioxide content of final molasses to the minimum
possible level.
75
A
Fixed
film
Designed and
actual capacity
for SW treatment,
m3/day
600
(360)
Design HRT,
Days (Actual
HRT, Days)
12.2
(20.3)
Design COD
loading rate,
kg/m3/day
9.8
(5.5)
COD reduction,
%
64.81
BOD reduction,
%
87.0
Gas generation,
m3/kg of COD
reduction
0.49
Gas generation
m3/m3 of raw
spent wash
76
35.11
B*
D2, D3Packed
media,
D4-UASB
D2-360
(243)
D3-360
(133)
D4-400
(424)
Name of Distillery
C
Down flow
followed by
up-flow
(Thermophilic)
D1-750
(512)
D2-390
(130)
D3-285
(206)
1000
(703)
D1- 18.0
(19.4)
D2- 18.0
(19.4)
D1- 12.0
(18)
D2- 14.0
(42.3)
D3- 26.0
(36)
21.0
(30)
D2- 10.8
(7.1)
D3- 11.3
(4.1)
D4- 5.0
(4.94)
D1- 5.62
(4.34)
D2- 5.62
(4.34)
D1- 7.0
(7.1)
D2-9.95
(2.68)
D3- 5.34
(3.10)
7.16
(4.94)
D2- 61.11
D3- 57.68
D4- 61.99
63.70
55.0
D2-89.41
D3- 85.88
D4- 88.82
90.0
72.21
D2- 0.50
D3- 0.50
D4- 0.53
D1- 0.59
D2- 0.59
0.47
D1- 37.25
D2- 37.25
33.20
D2- 9.0
(13.7)
D3- 8.8
(24)
D4- 21.0
(20)
D2- 29.88
D3- 28.30
D4- 31.74
D1-600
(550)
D2-600
(550)
D
E*
F
Down flow
D1-UASB CSTR
followed by
D2-Fixed
up-flow
film,
(Thermophilic) D3-CSTR
85.0
H*
UASB
D2-236
(175)
D3-226
(208)
D4-214
(226)
D2-8.0
(10.7)
D3-10.6
(11.5)
D4- 10.6
(11.2)
D2-10.0
(7.87)
D3-10.0
(7.3)
D4-10.0
(7.55)
D2- 66.0
D3- 66.0
D4- 64.0
90.0
0.55
0.60
32.82
Conclusions/Recommendations
Particulars
Type of technology
B
Disc &
tube
i) Number of stages
C
Disc & tube
followed by
NF followed
by UF
12
1,61,100
64,750
800
(697)
1400
(950)
2000
4500
Reject, M /day
3
Reject Brix
Permeate, M3/day
1480
2100
Name of Distillery
E
Disc & tube
F
Disc & tube
2,208
16,110
RO1-Not in
RO1- 500
operation
(436)
RO2-260
RO2- 500
(190)
(Not in
RO3- Dismantled operation)
H
Membrane bioreactor
with NF and RO
membrane system
(Spirally wound type)
2
Nano- 45RO- 30
840 (614)
2000
3000
5000
2200
500
10 days
0.5 days
9 days
25 days
9 days
393
402.6
103
231
393
304
547.4
205
221
6.1
10.0
55.0
(43.61)
Bio-com
posting
6.3
6.0
5.5
11.3
11.0
10.5
55.0
(57.6)
55.0
(45.50)
55.0
(47.0)
Bio-com
posting
87
Feed to MEE
Bio-com
posting
2.1
5.1
60.0
(58.06)
Feed to MEE
77
B
Disc &
tube
Type of technology
Disposal of permeate
C
Disc & tube
followed by
NF followed
by UF
For
process
& non
process
Degasser
followed
by ACF
E
Disc & tube
F
Disc & tube
H
Membrane bioreactor
with NF and RO
membrane system
(Spirally wound type)
For molasses
dilution
For cooling
tower make
up water
For cooling
tower make
up water
For molasses
dilution & floor
washing
Degasser
followed by
ACF
Degasser
Degasser
Degasser followed
by ACF
Conclusions/Recommendations
Name of Distillery
With or
Without TVR
A
D
Falling film Falling film
E
Falling film
Name of Distillery
G
Falling film
H
Falling film
With TVR
With TVR
With TVR
Without TVR
With TVR
Type of
effluent used
as feed
BMSW
BMSW
RO reject
Raw spent
wash
Nano reject
No. of effects
Designed &
5.0 40.0 5.0 30.0 10.0 35.0
actual solids (6.540.0) (6.5 10.9) (20.1-53.5)
concentration,
%
78
10.0 60.
(12.0 62.0)
I
J
Falling film
Forced
& forced
circulation
circulation
(Fluebex)
Without TVR TVR was
not in use
Raw spent
/concentrated
spent wash
Raw
spent
wash
3+4
A
D
Falling film Falling film
E
Falling film
Name of Distillery
G
Falling film
H
Falling film
I
J
Falling film
Forced
& forced
circulation
circulation
(Fluebex)
4.5
(4.5)
5.9
(4.5)
P1 2.
(P22.16)
114
(6.16.3)
2.5
(2.39)
IE- Alcohol
Vapour
SE 7.3 (5.4)
9.0
(9.0)
3.5
(3.2)
1.5
(1.2)
7.5
(7.5)
4.5
(4.5)
7.5
(7.5)
1.5
(1.2)
2.4
(2.4)
Design &
actual feed
M3/hr
30.00
(17.00)
40.40
(30.60)
15.90 Each
(P1-14.70)
(P2-14.74)
67.70
(15.00)
15.00
(12.88)
45.37
(37.50)
Design &
actualproduct
output, M3/hr
3.00
(2.24)
6.73
(18.60)
4.99
(9.50)
11.54
(Not in
operation)
0.75
(1.60)
IE- 26.00
(21.70) SE
-20.00
(14.40)
Design &
actual Water
evaporation
rate, M3/hr
25.00
(15.00)
33.66
(12.00)
10.90
(P1- 9.53)
(P2 9.58)
56.16
(12.10)
13.00
(11.52)
5.50
(3.30)
5.70
(2.70)
NP
(P1 4.54)
(P2 4.44)
4.01
(1.97)
5.20
(4.82)
20
20
20
24
170
207
185
NP
Design &
actual Steam
pressure,
kg/cm2
Steam
economy,
Kg of water
evaporated/
Kg of steam
used
Operation
hours/ day
Power
consumption,
Kw/hr
Treatment for
process
condensate
Degasser
followed
by ACF
Disposal of
condensate
water
Fertiirrigation
Disposal of
concentrate
product
Spent wash
dilution,
floor
washing &
pump sealing
Spray dryer
Biofollowed by composting
Incineration
IE- 19.50
(14.50)
SE - 8.00
(4.80)
10.24
(12.77)
IE -6.00
(7.10)
SE -11.50
(9.50)
35.69
(25.00)
1.57
(1.76)
3.96
(2.77)
20
24
24
74
IE- 226
SE 339
501
Reverse
osmosis
Plant
No
treatment
is given
No treatment
Degasser
is given
followed by
ACF
Cooling
tower
make up
Molasses
dilution
Cooling
tower
make up
Biocomposting
Incineration
Spray
dryer
followed by
Incineration
Molasses
Irrigation
dilution,
floor
washing &
pump sealing
Incineration Incineration
TVR- Thermal Vapor Re-compressor, IE- Integrated Evaporator, SE- Standalone Evaporator, ACF- Activated Carbon Filter,
NP-Not provided.
79
Conclusions/Recommendations
Well-established
technology
for
concentration up to 30% solids, which can
help in substantial reduction of spent wash
quantity.
Susceptible to scaling above 2,000 ppm
suspended solids in feed. Concentration
above 40% solids is yet not well established.
Proper de-gassing of bio-methanted spent
wash is required before concentration
through multiple effect evaporation plant.
Substantial quantity of steam is required for
evaporation of spent wash and therefore,
there will be additional recurring cost.
Feed
Feed, M3/day
Drying hot air inlet temperature, 0 C
Drying air outlet temperature, 0 C
Powder production, MT/day
Moisture % in powder
Calorific value of dry powder, Kcal/Kg
Particulars
Plant supplier
Capital investment
( ` crore)
Controlling system
used for plant
monitoring/operation
Design basis
Steam generation
capacity, (TPH)
Steam temperature,
( OC)
Boiler efficiency, (%)
80
MEE concentrate
60
400
125
20
4-5
2600
MEE concentrate
23.20
400
120
3.49
4-5
2200
Year or installation
Steam pressure,
Kg/cm2 (g)
2008-09
Name of Distillery
I
2009-10
2008-09
2009-10
Guangxi Luzhou
Thermal Power
Equipment Co., China
Industrial Boiler
Ltd.,
Vapi
40.0-45.0 (Including
civil and structure
works, MEE plant, slop
fired boiler and stack
control equipment)
36.0 (Including
MEE plant, boiler
and accessories)
24.6(Including MEE
plant, boiler
and accessories)
Semi-automatic
DCS
PLC
Semi-automatic
D: 25.0
A: 6.7
D: 22.0
A: 19.0-20.0
D:30.0
A:22.0-23.0
A: 2.0-2.5
D: 400.0 +/- 20
A: 400.0
D: 380.0 +/- 5
A: 380.0
D: 425.0 +/-10
A: 425.0
D:192.0+/- 5
A: 170.0
70.0
60.0
60.0-62.0
80.8-82.0
D: 32.0
A: 26.0-29.0
D: 44.0
A: 43.0-44.0
D: 45.0
A: 44.0
D:10.5
A:7.0-9.0
Particulars
Fluidized bed
Fluidized bed
Fire tube
D: 950
A:938 -950
D: 980 -1020
A: 960 -1000
Two furnaces:
Traveling grate with
pulsating grate &
superheater furnace
Coal
Coal
Calorific value,
Kcal/Kg
3,000 -3,500
3,800
2,000
i) Wooden chips
ii) Dried spent
wash powder
Fuel consumption,
Kg/hr.
30
D: 2,000
A:500 - 600
25-30
D: 2,250
A:2,100 -3600
20 (Bagasse)
D: 5,000
A:7,000 8,000
Less than 2%
3.0
NA
D: 11.2
A:
D: 7.8
A: 6.5 - 6.7
D: 10.5
A: 4.5
1,700 -1,800
@ 60O Bx
1,705
1,865
@65O Bx
Furnace details
Type
Temperature, OC
Fuel type
Ash, %
Bagasse/Coal
feeding point
height, meter
Slop feed
characteristics
Slop feed
temperature, OC
60 -70
1.5
D:81-88
A: 60-76
Conclusions/Recommendations
D: Not provided
A: 600 -800
Superheater: 502 -680
D:
A: 60 - 65
D :
A : 300
i) 2,200
ii) 2,200
D: 1,850
A: 2,200
NA
81
Capacity
65 KLPD
Maize/Sorghum
Batch
Name of Distillery
B
30 KLPD
Sorghum/Broken rice
Batch
80 KLPD
Sorghum/Broken rice
/Millet
Batch
Distillation technology
Multi-pressure
Multi-pressure
Multi-pressure
Alcohol % in Wash
10.0 11.0
9.0 11.0
13.0 14.0
Decantation
Evaporation
DWGS & DDGS
manufacture
Decantation
Bio-methanation
Reverse Osmosis
Bio-composting
Bio-methanation
Aerobic treatment
clarifier
Ferti-irrigation
Bio-methanation
Aerobic treatment
Ferti-irrigation
21.66
24.83
12.16
11.97
Main Product
EQRS/ENA
7.75
Decantation
Evaporation DWGS
manufacture
Quantity of secondary
effluent generated, lit/lit of
alcohol
5.46
82
EQRS/ENA
8.00
2.70
EQRS/ENA
4.00
1.02
15.14
6.93
Dnyaneshwar SSK
Majalgaon SSK
Tridhara Sugars
Rameshwar SSK
Makai SSK
Mula SSK
Lok. B. Patil SSK
Assignment details
83
Name of Distillery
Dnyaneshwar SSK
Vikas SSK
RS / ENA / AA
Vikas SSK
Vikas SSK
Plant Capacity
Expansion of 45 KLPD to 75
KLPD and up-gradation of effluent
30 KLPD
Biogas plant
RS / ENA / AA
60 KLPD
Export Quality RS
30 KLPD
RS / ENA
30 KLPD
Biogas plant
45 KLPD
Export quality RS
60 KLPD
Vikas SSK
(Pre-bid, Technical subcommittee
and SLMPC meetings)
SMSM Patil SSK (Pre-bid, Technical subcommittee
and SLMPC meetings)
Kumbhi Kasari SSK (Pre-bid, Technical
subcommittee and SLMPC meetings)
Datta Shetkari SSK (Pre-bid, Technical
subcommittee and BoDs meetings)
Plant Configuration
Visits
The staff of department visited member and nonmember distilleries in Maharashtra and other states,
government offices, institutions etc. for different
assignments. The details of these 172 visits are
given in Annexure XIII
Recommendation of Proposals
84
Table 37 : Recommendations
Recommendation
Dnyaneshwar SSK
Manganga SSK
Installation of pre-fermenters.
Sonhira SSK
Sahyadri SSK
Dnyaneshwar SSK
Kopargaon SSK
Ganesh SSK
Name of Distillery
Makai SSK
Pandurang SSK
Rena SSK
85
Chem-cad Simulations
Makai SSK
Type of Project
Kopargaon SSK
Dnyaneshwar SSK
Name of Distillery
Manganga SSK
Type of Equipment
Nira-Bhima SSK
Ganesh SSK
86
Analytical Services
Calibration Work
Name of distillery
Ajinkyatara SSK
Nature of problem
Madhukar SSK
Renuka Sugars
Pvt. Ltd.
Methanol content in
the ENA was on
higher side.
Kumbhi Kasari
SSK
Ashok SSK
Disturbed fermentation
process after weak beer
recycle of more than
10%.
Incidence of
spontaneous
combustion of
molasses in steel tank.
Rajarambapu Patil Alcohol losses through 1) There was a difference in scanner temperature of 230C
SSK
spent lees from existing as compared to the caliberated thermometer. 2) Advice
20 KLPD ENA plant.
was given to calibrate all temperature sensors, to supply
sufficient flow of cooling water to the condensers and to
optimize the RS feed to the column. 3) After taking necessary
precautions the performance of ENA plant improved.
Gangakhed Sugar
and Energy Ltd
88
Name of distillery
Nature of problem
Dharani Sugars
and Chemicals
Ltd.
Ganesh SSK
Sanjivani (Takli)
SSK
Malegaon SSK
Manjara Shetkari
SSK
Fermentation process
problems and low
alcohol yield per ton
of molasses.
Souring of digesters,
poor generation of
biogas and increase in
content of hydrogen
sulphide
89
2006-07
Production Capacity (million lit./300days) 618.00
considering all distilleries.
Production Capacity (million lit./300days) 489.48
based on received information
Number of distilleries whose
49
information was compiled
Average net working days
195.65
Molasses consumed (million tonnes)
1.363
Alcohol produced (million lit.)
347.54
Average Fermentation Efficiency (%)
89.17
Average Distillation Efficiency (%)
98.41
Recovery of Alcohol (lit./tonnes of molasses) 266.08
Capacity utilization (%)
90
63.31
Year
2007-08
654.00
2008-09
663.00
2009-10
723.00
2010-11
745.50
618.00
604.50
604.50
640.50
53
51
51
53
216.85
1.754
446.07
89.44
98.31
270.19
180.66
1.468
364.24
89.44
98.43
271.12
148.80
1.125
309.33
89.78
98.45
270.28
178.84
1.344
363.68
89.70
98.40
270.51
76.69
66.85
47.34
52.25