[go: up one dir, main page]

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
866 views150 pages

كتاب التخيل

This document is the introduction to a book about imagination and perception. It discusses how we perceive objects, like a piece of paper on a table. We perceive its shape, color, and location through our senses, but the paper exists independently of our perception or consciousness. The paper is an "object" that is present yet inactive, existing on its own without depending on anyone's awareness. The introduction establishes a distinction between objects, which exist passively, and consciousness, which exists through its own awareness.

Uploaded by

api-26517652
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
866 views150 pages

كتاب التخيل

This document is the introduction to a book about imagination and perception. It discusses how we perceive objects, like a piece of paper on a table. We perceive its shape, color, and location through our senses, but the paper exists independently of our perception or consciousness. The paper is an "object" that is present yet inactive, existing on its own without depending on anyone's awareness. The introduction establishes a distinction between objects, which exist passively, and consciousness, which exists through its own awareness.

Uploaded by

api-26517652
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 150

‫ﺘﻌﺭﻴﺏ ﻟﻁﻔﻲ ﺨﻴﺭﺍﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﹼﻌﻠﻴﻕ ﻤﻨﻪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ‪.

‬‬

‫ﺍﻹﻫﺩﺍﺀ ﺇﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﺩﺘﻲ‬

‫ﺍﻟﺘﹼﺨﻴّﻞ‬
‫‪www.fiseb.cm‬‬

‫ﻓﻬﺮس اﻟﻜﺘﺎب‬
‫ﺗﻮﻃﺌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﻕ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‬
‫ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﰲ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﺻﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻭﺿﻌ ّﻲ‬

‫ﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻲ‬

‫ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‬
‫ﺧﺎﲤﺔ‬

‫ﺗﻮﻃﺌﺔ‬

‫ﺴَﺘ ِﻘ ﱠﺮ ﹰﺓ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻃﺎﻭﻟﱵ؛ ﻭﺇﻧّﻲ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺷﻜﻠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮﻬﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ‪.‬‬


‫ﺇﻧّﲏ ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻣُ ْ‬
‫ﺹ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﻫﻲ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻟﺒﺼﺮﻱ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺍ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻﳝﻜﻨﲏ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻻﻳﺘﻮﻗﹼﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﰐ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺄﻧﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺘﻮﻗﹼﻒ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺘﲏ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻃﺎﳌﺎ ﻭﺻﻔﻨﺎﻩ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ‬
‫ﻭﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺎﻗﺶ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺗﻨﺤ ﹼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﺃﻡ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ)‪ .(١‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺾ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻋﺎﻳﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﱵ‬
‫ﺃﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻗﻄﻌﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻋﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻀﻄ ّﺮ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﻨﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻓﺸﻴﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲝﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﳕﻂ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﳏﺾ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺾ ﻋﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺿﺮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲟﺎﻫﻲ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻄﺎﳍﺎ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﳛﻔﻆ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻬﺎ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﻳﺼﻮﻧﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﺭﺕ ﺭﺃﺳﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻢ ﺃﻋﺪ ﺃﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺃﺭﻯ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺋﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮّﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﻭﱂ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﺟﻴّﺪﺍ ﺣﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻔﻦ‪:‬‬
‫ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻄﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻔﹼﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻲ ﺃﻧﺎ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﺎﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﺮّﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ)‪ .(٢‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﱂ ﺃﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺳﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﻝ ﻣﻨﺼﺒّﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ؛ ﻭﻻ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺪ ﲢﺮّﻙ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻓﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﻣﺮّﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺑﺸﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻮﻬﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ؛ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺷﺎﻫﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺑﺸﺨﺼﻬﺎ ؟ ﻧﻌﻢ ﻭﻻ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﲏ‬
‫ﺖ‬
‫ﺃﺟﺰﻡ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴّﺎﻬﺗﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﲏ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻏﺎﻓﻼ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻗﺪ ﹶﻟِﺒﹶﺜ ْ‬
‫ﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ‪ :‬ﻭﺃﻋﺮﻑ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﺳﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﲝﻀﻮﺭﻫﺎ ؛ ﻓﻠﻮ ُﺭ ْﻣ ُ‬
‫ﺃﻋﻮﺩ ﳌﻜﺘﱯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﺃﹸ ْﺭ ِﺟ َﻊ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻔﹼﺎﻑ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻵﻥ ﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺷﺎﻫﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﹶﻗ ْﺒﻞﹸ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﻋﲏ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﻳّﺘﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ)‪ .(٣‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ‬
‫ﺗﺼﺤﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻣﻜﺘﱯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻻ ﲡﺐ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻨّﻬﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﱵ؛ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‬
‫ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻻﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻮ ﻓﺤﺼﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻣﺴﺒّﻘﺔ؛ ﻟﺘﺒﻴّﻨﺖ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﺃﺿﻊ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﺴﺖ ﺃﺣﺼﻲ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻧﺴﻤّﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳّﺔ ﺃﻭﻏﲑ ﺇﺭﺍﺩﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‬
‫ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﻀﻮﺭﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﺃﺿ ﹼﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﺩﻫﺸﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺇﺩﻫﺎﺵ ﺍﻣﺮﺀ ﱂ ﻳﺪﺭﺱ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﻃﻠﺒﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺷﺮﺣﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ :‬ﻫﻞ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺧﻠﻄﺖ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺥ ﻟﻚ ﻭﺣﻀﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺲ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪﻙ ؟ ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺮّﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻭِﻟ ﱞﻲ ﻟﻠﺤ ّ‬
‫ﲏ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬

‫ﻓﺄﻥ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮّﻥ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ)‪ .(٤‬ﻓﺎﻟﺴّﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺆﺳّﺲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﻠﺘﺰﻡ ﺻﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻻﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻻ ﻧﺪﱄ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﲟﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻼ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺳّﻂ‪ ،‬ﲡﺮﺑﺔ َﺭ َﻭ ِﻭﱠﻳ ٍﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻌﺐ ﺟﺪّﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻻﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺪ ﺫﻫﲏّ؛ ﻭﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺧﺎﺻّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﱪّﺃ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺗﻘﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻧﺆﺳّﺲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋ ّﻲ)‪ .(٥‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﻠﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ُﻳ ْﻨ َﺰﻉُ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﲔ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﰒﹼ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻧﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺾ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﻜﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺸﺄ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﳛﺪﺙ ﺍﻧﺰﻻﻕ‪،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﳍ ّﻮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ)‪ .(٦‬ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺠﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛ ّﻮﻧّﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺤﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺎﻫﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ " ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ " ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ‬
‫" ﰲ ﺷﺨﺼﻬﺎ "‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺫﺍﻬﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﺗﻐﻴﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﺎﺀ ﻻ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ؛ ﻭﻻﺗﻜ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ُﻣ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛﺔﹰ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺗﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻛﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ ﺍﻷﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳓﻦ‬
‫ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺒﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﺍﳋﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻘﺪﺭﺗﺔ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺮّﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻀﻴﻒ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺴﻤﻌﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻﺯﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺴ ٍﺔ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﺎ ﺳﺎﺫﺟﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻣُ َﺆ ﱠﺳ َ‬
‫ﻳﺮﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ ﻭﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳌﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻉ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺮّﻗﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ؛ ﻭﺇﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺳّﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﲔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻳﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﻗﺘﲔ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻤﺎﺛﻠﺘﲔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺎﺛﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺗﲔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸّﻴﺌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﺪﻭﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭ ﳒﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﺑﻴﻘﻮﺭ ﰲ " ﺍﳍﻴﺎﻛﻞ "‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻻ ﻳﻜ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻨﻬﺎ " ﻫﻴﺎﻛﻞ"‪ ،‬ﻭ"ﺃﺻﻨﺎﻡ "‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺃﻭﻋﻴﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻛﻴﻔﻴّﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﶈﺘﻮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﺾ ﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ ﺯﻣﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺫﺍﻬﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍ ﹸﳌﻔِﻴ ِ‬
‫ﻻ ﳏﺪﻭﺩﺍ‪ .‬ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﺳّﺔ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺗﺴﺘﻮﻋﺒﻬﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﲏ ﻳﻌﻠﹼﻤﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﶈﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬
‫ﻱﰲ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺪﻣﺞ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻧﻈﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ َﻳ ْﻌﺘُﻮ ُﺭﻫَﺎ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪّﻭﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻱ ﲤﺜﹼﻠﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﻤﻠﺖ ﻭﺻﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺹ ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻧﺴﻘﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺮﻯ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻓﻘﻂ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺪّﻭﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﻬﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺮّﻓﺔ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﺳﻴّﺌﺎ ) ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻦ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺃﺩﱏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﻴّﺰ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺡ ( ﻭﻫﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﺤﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻼ ِﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﻭ ﺇﻧّﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﺸﻌﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺘﺎﻥ ﺗُ َﻌ ﱢﻠ ﹶ‬
‫ﺗﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺳﻮﻑ ﳒﺪﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﺔ ﺍﻟﻀّﻤﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﺪﻯ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﲝﺜﻮﺍ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺠﻤﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻌﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻠﻂ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳍﻮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳍﻮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﻁ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﻜﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻭﲨﻴﻌﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺑﲎ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻗﺪ ﹶﻓﺮُ ﹶ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﺩﻫﻢ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﺮﻫﻮﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻴﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﻨﻌﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺳﺌﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﻏﺮﺽ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﺳﻄﺤﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻨّﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﻓﺮﺩﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺳﺘّﲔ ﻋﺎﻣﺎ‬
‫ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﺸﻒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﻓﺄﻥ‬
‫ﻧﱪﻫﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺪ ﲢﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﻮّﻉ‪ ،‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺖ ﺑﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ُﻫ ﱢﺬَﺑ ْ‬
‫ﻕ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﺪﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺃﻭﺭﺛﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ َﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎ ُ‬
‫‪Descartes‬ﻭﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ‪ Leibnitz‬ﻭﻫﻴﻮﻡ ‪ Hume‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﻮﺍ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻢ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟّﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻆ ﲟﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺭﺛﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‬
‫ﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺣﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﻻﺋﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻔﻠﺢ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﳜﺘﺎﺭ ﺣ ﹼ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﲟﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﱪﻫﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺇﻻ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻛﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﹸﳌﺼَﺎ َﺩ َﺭ ِﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻲ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺴﻂ ﺑﺴﻄﺎ ﳐﺘﺼﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ‬

‫)‪ (1‬ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻼﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜ ّﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻟﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻷﻭﱃ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻀﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﻳﺆﺛﹼﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﲤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﺫﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭﻛﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺮﻯ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻮ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﺪ َﺭﻙُ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻﺷﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (2‬ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻭﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﺭﺕ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺳﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠﺔﹲ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻓﻘﺪ‬
‫ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺷﻚّ‪ ،‬ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ؛ ﻓﺎﻵﻥ ﻫﻲ ُﻣَﺘ َ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣُ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ﹰﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (3‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﹼﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳉﺰﺋ ّﻲ ﲟﺎﻫﻮﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻜﻮﻻﺳﺘﻜﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳉﺰﺋ ّﻲ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺸّﺨﺺ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (4‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ُﻣ َﺆ ﱢﺳﺴًﺎ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ُﻣ َﺆ ﱢﺳﺴًﺎ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ َﺭ َﻭ ِﻭﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﻴّﺎ‬
‫ﺲ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﺭﺍﺟﻌﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﹸ َﺆ ﱢﺳ ِ‬

‫)‪ (5‬ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺻﺎﺭﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫)‪ (6‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﻔﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ َﻧ ﹾﻔﺲُ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠ ِﻖ ﺍﻟﻮ ْﻋَﻴ ْﻴﻦِ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﱰﻟﻖ ﻟﻠﺤﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﺣﺪﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺃﻱ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳒﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠﺔﹸ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ِﺔ‪ .‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻛﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍ ﹸﳌَﺘ َ‬

‫‪I‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺴﺎﻕ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ‬

‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﻏﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺣﻀﺮﺓ ﺗﺮﺍﺙ ﻣﺪﺭﺳ ّﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳُﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﺣﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﺼﻼ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻓﻴﺎ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﱐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎﺩﻱّ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ َﺭ ﱠﺩ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮ ّﺩ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺱ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﺼﺎﺏ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‬
‫ﺹ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺍﳊﻮﺍ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺟﺴﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﳋﺎ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻓﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ َﻣ ﹾﻄ ِﻠﱠﻴﺔﹲ ﻣﺎﺩّﻳﺎ ﰲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﻻ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﺚ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺣﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﺍﺀ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ؛ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﹸﻭ ِﻗ َﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻄﻲ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ)‪ .(١‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻗﺪّﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺟﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻻﻬﻧﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﲟﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﲤﻠﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺎﺻّﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺑﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺜﺎﺙ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ)‪(٢‬؛ ﻓﺎﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ ﺇﺫ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺒّﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺎﻬﺗﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗُﻮ ِﻗﻆﹸ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﺍ؛ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻻ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻓﻄﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﺤ ِﺪﺙﹸ ﰲ‬
‫ﲟﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺸِﺒﻪُ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺐ ﰲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻋﺮ؛ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﱂ ُﻳ ﹾﻄِﻨ ْ‬
‫ﺧﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺮّﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﻃﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﻴّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺄﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍ ﹸﳌَﺘ َﻌﺪﱢﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩّﺍﻩ‬
‫ﻷﻥ ﻳُ ْﺪ ِﺧ ﹶﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻳﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺺ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻻ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﺃﺧ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺣﺴﺐ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳُ ْﺪ ِﺭﻛﹸﻪُ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﻻ ﲤﻜﹼﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻻﺕ‪،‬‬


‫ﺝ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ‬
‫ﻷﻧّﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ َﻳ ُﺮ ﱡ‬
‫ﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ)‪ .(٣‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﲑ ﻣﺘﺄ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻭﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﳝﻜﹼﻨﺎﻧﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺼﻞ‪ ،‬ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﲏ ﻟﻠﺨﻴﺎﻻﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳّﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺪﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺑﺎﳉﺴﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺗﻔﻜﹼﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ‬
‫ﻱ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺟﻪ‬
‫ﺃّ‬
‫ﳍﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﺘﻤﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻮﻛﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﹼﺪ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻭﺿﻮﺣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﻻ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺣﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻔﺼﻮﻟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﻣﺘّﺼﻠﺔ ﺑﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﱐﹼ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﺪﻓﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻳﻨﺎﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﺒﻌﺎﺛﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﺘﻪ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ؛ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺆﻟﹼﻒ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﺒﻬﻤﺔ ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﳋﻠﻂ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ؛ ﻓﻬﻲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺤﺖ‬
‫ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺒﺘﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ُﺗﻀَﺎ ّﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﻴّﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻔﻆ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ؛ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ‪ُ ،‬ﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ ﺍﳌﺘﺮﺩّﻱ‬
‫ﺢ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﳘﺎ‬
‫ﺼﱡ‬‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ َﺗ ِ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﺑﺈﻃﻼﻕ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺑﺘﺤﻘﹼﻖ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻮﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺃﻣﺮ ﳑﻜﻦ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻨﺲ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺚ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺩﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺘﲔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻻﻥ ﻭﻣﺘّﺼﻼﻥ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪9‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﻠﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﺍ ﻭﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﲟﺎﻫﻮ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﲤﻴﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺼ ﹶﻠ ْ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﹸﻓ ِ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪ ﻟﻴﺒﺘﱰ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ ﲣﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻱ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﺍ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻋﺎﱂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻨﻔﺼﻞ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ‬


‫ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺟﻬﺪ ﻻﻳﺒﺘﱰ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺼ ّ‬
‫ﺸ َﺮَﺑﺔﹲ ﻋﻘﻼ)‪(٤‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣُ ْ‬

‫ﻓﻠﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﺃ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺑﻮﺻﻒ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳏﺾ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻜﹼﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ ﻳﻌّﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺟﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﱂ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﻣﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺤﻔﻆ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻴّﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻤﻴّﺰﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻣﻀﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ‪ :‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﲝﺴﺐ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‬


‫ﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻋﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺗُﺼُ ﱢﻮ َﺭ ْ‬
‫ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺎ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻟﻠﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻌﻼ‬
‫ﲔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻋﺮﺿﻴّﺎ ﻭﺗﺎﺑﻌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻣُ ِﻌ ٍ‬
‫ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻘﺎ ﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺍﺣﺘﻔﺎﻅ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ‬
‫ﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﺍﺀ ﻟﻠﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﹼﻖ ﺑﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺗﺼ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﹶﻟ ْﺒﺲٍ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻴّﻨﺎ؛ ﻭﻳﺘﺄﺗّﻰ ﺍﻟ ﱠﻠ ْﺒ ُ‬
‫ﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻩ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﻳﺘﻠﻘﹼﻰ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴﲑﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺒﻬﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻟﹶﺒﺲ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴّﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺟﺰﺀ ﺟﺰﺀ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴّﻨﺔ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﺍﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺒﺲ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺭﻛﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴَﻨﺔﹰ؛ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴﻦُ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﲨﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﳉﻬﻠﻨﺎ‬
‫ﲟﺮﻛﹼﺒﺎﻬﺗﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﺇﺫﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺭﻳﺎﺿ ّﻲ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﳍﺎ‬
‫ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﳍﺎ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻟﻜ ّﻢ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﹸﺤ ﱠﻠ ِﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ُﻣ َﻌﱢﺒﺮَﺍ ِﻥ‪.‬‬

‫ﺤ ﱡﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﱃ‬


‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ُﺗ َ‬
‫ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺒﲑﻳّﺔ‪ِ ،‬ﻟُﺘﺸَﺎ ِﺭ َﻙ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﰲ ﺷﺮﻓﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﰐ ﻣﺘﻌﺬﹼﺭ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﹶﺃﻧﱠﻰ ﻟﺘﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻷﺻﻔﺮ ﻭﺍﻷﺯﺭﻕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﺗﺒّﻴﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﻀﺮ ؟ ﻭﺃﻧّﻰ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺿﻌﻔﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺷﺪّﻬﺗﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﺘﱰ ﱂ ﳛﺘﻔﻞ ﺑﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻳﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺪ ّﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ)‪ .(٥‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺃﺿﻠﹼﺘﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴّﺔ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺒﺲ ﻳﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻴﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻻ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴّﺔ؛ ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺮّﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﱂ ﻧﺴﺘﻮﻋﺒﻪ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻀﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺛﺨﺎﻧﺔ ﻻ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﻳﻬﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻓﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻜﻴﻒ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻢّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜ ّﻢ ﻻﻬﻧﺎﺋﻴّﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﺢ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺪ ﻟﻺﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺻﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﳊﺴّﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺰﻋﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻭّﻻ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﱂ ُﻳ ﹾﻔ ِﻠ ْ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔ ﺫﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﻏﺎﻣﻀﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﹼﰒ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲤﻜﹼﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻓﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻻﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻻﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﲤﺜﹼﻼ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴّﺎ ﻝ " ﺟﻨﺲ‬
‫ﰲ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳُ ْﻤ ِﻜ َﻦ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫" ﻣﻦ " ﺟﻨﺲ " ﺁﺧﺮ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺟﺰﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺣﻀﺮﺓ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺌﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﻠﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ‪ ،‬ﹼﳌﺎ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺳّﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﱠﺘ َﻤﱡﺜ ِﻠﱠﻴ ِﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺧﻔﻖ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﺟﻠﻴّﺎ ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻷﺻﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‬
‫ﱄ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺣﲔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺣﻠﹼﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﻘﺎﺑﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺧﱪﻳّﺔ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻬﺪﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮ ّﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻧﺴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ)‪ .(٦‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﱄ ﻟﻠﺘّﺨﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭُﺑ َﻌ ْﻴ َﺪﻣَﺎ ﺃﻓﺮﺩﺕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﲢﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﻭﺻﻔﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻵ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻀﺮﺏ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ‬
‫ﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺤﺮّﻙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻭﻧﺴﺦ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻨﺤﻔﻆ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﻀﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ؛ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻻ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﳑّﺎ‬
‫ﳚﻌﻞ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻧﺘﻌﺮّﻑ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ‬
‫ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺳﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺎ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺫﻱ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻣﺾ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻤﻮﺿﻪ ﻟﺪﻯ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻳﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺴﻴﻔﺴﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ‪.‬‬

‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ " ﻗﻮﻯ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺎﺑﻪ‬
‫ﱄ ﻭﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﺳﺤﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻄﺎﺓ "؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻀﺎﻣّﻢ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳒﺬﺍﺑﺎﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﺁ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻜﹼﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺇﻃﻼﻕ ﺍﲰﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺪﻓﻌﻨﺎ ﻟﻼﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﰲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪12‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ "ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ " ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﻓﺼﺎﺡ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﺎﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻛﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺻ ﹸﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﻴﻘﻆ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗُﻮ َ‬
‫ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺠ ﹶﻠﺐُ ﺑﻘﻮّﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﺎﺓ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﻣَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴَﻨ ﹰﺔ‪ .‬ﻭِﻟ َﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﱴ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺤﻬَﺎ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ؟ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﱂ ﻳﻀﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻣَﺎِﻧ ُ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﺨّﺮ ﺑﺄﻛﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘّﺨﺬ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ‪،‬‬
‫ﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻓﺎﻋﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺳﻮﻓﻮﺭﺳﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺯّﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻌﺎ ﺟﺰﺍﻓﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺠَﺒ َﺮﺓﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﻊ‬
‫ﹼﰒ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻛﻠﹼﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣُ ْ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻨﻔﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴﻨّﻪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳُﻌﻄﻴﻪ ﺃ ّ‬

‫*‬
‫* *‬
‫ﺖ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻓﻤﻨﺬ ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺻِﻴ َﻐ ْ‬
‫ﺻﻮﻏﺎ ﺑﻴّﻨﺎ؛ ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺣﻠﻮﻝ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺈﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴﲔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ‪ ،‬ﺃﻫﻞ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﳛ ﹼﻞ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺤﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﺒﺘﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﳏﺾ ﻋﻤﻠ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺿﺮﺏ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻧﻔﻌﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﺎﻫﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺫﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻨﺎ ﻛﻮﻧﻨﺎ ﺑﺸﺮﺍ ﺗﻔﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮّﺓ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ؛ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳓﻜﻢ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳍﺎ ﲞﺎﺻّﺔ‬
‫ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻋﻤﻠﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠﻴّﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳّﺔ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻔﺰ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻻﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﻗﻠﺒﺎ ﺃﻭ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﻜﺮﺍﺭ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ " ﻗﻠﺒﺎ" ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺬﹼﺭﻳّﺔ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻟﺰﻣﺖ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺹ‬
‫ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺳﻮﻑ ﳚﺐ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳚﺘﻤﻊ ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻷﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻤﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﺨﻴّﻠﻬﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠ ِﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻘ ﹶﻠ ِﺔ ﰲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻳﻘﻀﻲ ﺑﺎﳍﻮﻳّﺔ "‬
‫ﻭﺣﺘّﻰ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﺑﺎﳌﺴﺎﻭﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻤﻊ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َ‬
‫ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻮ ﻫﻮ‪ ".‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻻﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﲟﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮّﻳﺒﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﰲ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﶈﺾ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻳُﺠِﻴﺰُﻭ ﹶﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ﹶﻘ ﱢﻌ َﺪ‬
‫ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻫﺎ ﻻﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺻﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻟّﺘﻘﻌﻴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳّﺔ ﺣﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺨ َﺪﻡُ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻄﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺮّﻣﻮﺯ‪،‬‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﺗُ َﻬﱢﻴﹶﺄ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻠﺐ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺖ ﻭ َﺷ ﹾﺄَﻧﻬَﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ ﰲ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻴﲑ ﻓﻜﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗُ ِﺮ ﹶﻛ ْ‬
‫ﻑ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺼ َﺮ َ‬
‫ﱄ)‪ .(٧‬ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﳏﺾ ﺁ ﹼ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﱰﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺻﻒ ﻧﻔﺴ ّﻲ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻟﻦ ﻳُ ْﻤ ِﻜ َﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﺤﺺ‬
‫ﺍﺑﺴﺘﻤﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻭﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﺪّﻻﻻﺕ‪.‬‬

‫ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﻠﹼﻢ‬
‫ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺔ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻓﻼﻃﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻛﻠﺘﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﲤﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮﺭﻏﺒﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺿﻌ ّﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪14‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺇﱃﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮ ُﺭ ْﻣﻨَﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﺘﻮﺟّﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻧﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﺳﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻱ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻭ ﹶﻝ ﻣﺎُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‪ .‬ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳓﻜﻢ‬
‫ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻧّﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳕ ّﺮ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇﺫﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺈﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ُﻧ ِﻘ ﱠﺮ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ)‪ .(٨‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻓﺮﺩﻳّﺔ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﻘﺮﺃ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻻﺑﺴﺘﻤﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ‪ " :‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﺴﺘﻘﺮﺃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ "‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘ ّﻲ‪ :‬ﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺒﻖ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ‪Nihil est in intellectu quod‬‬
‫‪non fuerit prius in sensu..‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺤ ِﺪﺙﹸ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﳛﺪﺙ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺼﺔﹲ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺨ َ‬
‫ﺸﱢ‬‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﺮّﺡ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺸﻤﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻫﻴﻮﻣﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻣَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻻ َﺟ َﺮ َﻡ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟُﺒﻨَﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﻗﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻬﺗﺎﻭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﺗﺒﻖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭــ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺘﻬﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﲎ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﻗﻴّﺔ ﺗﺘﻬﺎﻭﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻟﻸﻧﺎ ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻧﻄﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺗﻘﻀﻲ ﺑﺎﳍﻮﻳّﺔ ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺟﺬﺭﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻭﺿﺮﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻓﺘﺆﻟﹼﻒ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ‬
‫ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻳﺘّﺼﻞ ﺑﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﻀﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻧﻄﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻜﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺖ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻴّﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻓﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﻄﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﹶﻟ ِﺰ َﻣ ْ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ‪ ،‬ﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲰﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﱂ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﻳﻨﻠﻬﺎ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻬﺎﻭﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﻳﺴﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ‪ِ ،‬ﻣ ْﻦ ﹶﻗ ْﺒﻞﹸ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ)‪.(٩‬‬
‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺑﺄﺷﻜﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧﺘﺮﻭﺑﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺿﻌﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻢ ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻏﺎﻓﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﺋﻦ َﻳَﺘ َﻤﱠﺜﻞﹸ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻧﺘﺮﻭﺑﻮﺑﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﱡﻨ ﹾﻄ ﹶﻔ ِﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗّﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻀﻴﻒ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺟﺘﺰﺃﺕ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻳﻀﻊ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ِﺧ ﹾﻠﻮًﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳُ ْﺒ ِﻖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳓﺘﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺭﻭﺣﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﻭﻡ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﲟﺠﺎﻧﺴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﱪﻫﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﶈﻀﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﹶﻗ ْﺒﻞﹸ ﻋﻘﻼ‪ .‬ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻧﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ‬
‫ﳊ ِﺮﻱﱢ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﹶﻗ ْﺒﻞﹸ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺗﻌﺒﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ‪ :‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎ ﹶ‬
‫ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﺒﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ؛‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭ ّ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﰲ ﺍﳋﱪ ّ‬
‫ﱐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﻋﻠﹼﺔ ﻟﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺷﻜﻠﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻﻋﻘﻞ ﺇﻧﺴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺎﺻﺮ ﰲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﻘﺮﺃ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﻴﺚ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ‪ .‬ﻭ" ﺍﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ " ﻟﻠﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺣﻘﺎﺋﻖ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﻟﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍ ﻟﻠﻜﺮﺳ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ ﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ُﺗ َﺮ ﱡﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻀﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺣ ﹼﻞ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﴰﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸّﻤﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻳﻨﻀﺎﻑ ﺇﱃ ﺧﱪﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﻤﻘﺘﻀﻰ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﻻﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻜﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﳊﺪﺱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﲢﺼﻞ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ ﺑﻔﻜﺮ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ‪،‬‬
‫ﰐ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺻﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺴﻖ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺎﻭﺏ ﻟﻮﻙ ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻬﻢ‬
‫ﲢﻠﻴﻞ َﺭ َﻭ ِﻭ ﱟ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﱪﻳﲔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﰲ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﻊ ﻟﻮﻙ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﳝﺘﺎﺯ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ـ ﺃﻭ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺾ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ـ ﺃﻭ‬


‫ﺇﻣّﺎ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻓﻜﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻋﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﻭﺭﺍﺀﻫﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ) ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻫﻮﰐ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ َﻧ ُﺪ ﱡﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ِﻹ ْﺣﻜﹶﺎ ِﻡ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ (‪ :‬ﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺑﺴﻄﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺣﺎﻓﻈﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﻋﻼﻗﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮﺕ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺭُِﺋ َﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﻱ ﰲ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﹼﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺘﻌﻘﹼﺐ ﺍﻟﺘّﻄﻮّﺭ ﺍﳌﺘّﺼﻞ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﱪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﺳﻊ‬
‫ﻋﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﹸﳌﺼَﺎ َﺩ َﺭ ِﺓ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺛﻼﺛﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﳑﻜﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﺍﺀ ﻭﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﺍﺀ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (1‬ﻓﺪﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻳﻔﺮّﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺮﺩّﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻱ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻠﹼﻒ ﰲ‬
‫ﲏ‬
‫ﲏ ﻳﺘﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻘﻞﹸ ﻟﻸﺛﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ِ ،‬ﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ‬
‫ﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬

‫)‪ (2‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻻ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻺﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻻﺳﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎﻻﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺨ ﱢﻠﻒُ ﺃﺛﺮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﲟﺎﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﲟﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎﺩّﻱ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳُ َ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﳜﻠﹼﻒ ﺃﺛﺮﺍ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺘﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ .‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺛﺮ َﻣ ِﺰﱠﻳﺔﹲ ﻻﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﲑ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗُِﺜ َ‬
‫ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (3‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ َﺣ ﱠﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻟﻠﺨﻴﺎﻝ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺍ َﻷﹶﺛ ِﺮ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺜﲑﻫﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻚ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺮّﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻚ َﺣ ﱞﻖ ﻟﻠﺴّﺒﺐ ﺍﻵﰐ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ؟ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴﻞٍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻣَُﺘ ﹶﺬ ﱠﻛ ٍﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻔﺮّﻕ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﻭﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ُﻣَﺘ َ‬
‫ﻓﺎﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴّﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﻠﺤﻤﻪ ﻭﺩﻣﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ؛ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ ﹶﺬ ﱠﻛﺮُ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ‪،‬‬
‫ﺴﻤﱠﻰ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ‪ .‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﹶﻗﺮِﻳَﻨ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻨﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣُ ﹶﻘ ﱢﻮ َﻣﺔﹲ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﹼﺮﻱ؛‬
‫ﺨﺬﹰﺍ َﺣﱢﻴﺰًﺍ ﺯﻣﻨﻴّﺎ ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ُﻣﱠﺘ ِ‬
‫ﻚ ﻫﻮ‪ :‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻘﻮّﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﱴ ﺗﻘﺮّﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺸ ّ‬
‫ﺨ ﱠﻠ ﹶﻔ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻧُ ِﻈ َﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺑﻜﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﺍ ﻣَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺛﻨﲔ ؟ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﻚّ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺳﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺽ ﻋﻤﻼ ُﺣ ﹾﻜ ِﻤﻴ‪‬ﺎ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻓﺮﺯ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴّﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﺎﻣﻴّﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪18‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (4‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﻗﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪّﺭﺟﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﱐ ﲟﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺾ ﻋﻘﻠﻴّﺔ ﻭﺫﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﳏﺾ ﻣﺎﺩّﻱ ﻭﻻ ﻋﻘﻼ ﹼ‬
‫ﺲ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﺤ ﹼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻻ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣُ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛﺔﹲ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﹶﻟ ْﺒ ٍ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴَﻨ ﹰﺔ ‪. Perçues sans être aperçues.‬‬

‫)‪ (5‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺑ َﺮ ْﻭ ِﻣ ِﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺑﺄﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪّﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﲟﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﻋﻴﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ‪Structure‬‬
‫‪phénoménolgique immédiate de la conscience‬‬

‫)‪ (6‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺣ ﹼﻞ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻓﺴﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﻣّﺔ ﳊ ﹼﻞ ﻻﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ‬
‫ﺣﻠﹼﻪ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺮ ّﺩ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﺮ ّﺩ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﺤ ِﺪﹸﺛﻬَﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻓﻴﻨﺎ‪ .‬ﺍﻧﻈﺮ‬
‫ﻭﺳﻮﻑ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ُﺗ ْ‬
‫ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪The nature of human‬‬

‫ﺠ ﱠﺮ ِﺩﻫَﺎ ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻀﺒﻄﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻀﺒﻂ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‬


‫)‪ (7‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ َﻣ ﹾﺄﺧُﻮ ﹶﺫ ﹰﺓ ِﺑ ُﻤ َ‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻵ ﹼ‬

‫)‪ (8‬ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻘﺪّﻣﺎﺕ ﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ‪Prolegomena Zur reinen‬‬


‫‪Logik‬‬

‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﻭﺷﻲﺀ‬
‫)‪ (9‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﺗﲔ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻳﻀﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻳﺮﻓﻌﻪ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪19‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫‪II‬‬
‫ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﰲ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﺻﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻭﺿﻌ ّﻲ‬

‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﲡﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺮّﻭﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻌﻮﺩﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻭﺇﱃ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍ ﹶﳌ ﹶﻠ ﹶﻜ ِﺔ ﻭﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻣﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺪّﻫﺮ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺮﻧﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ ﻟﻸﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ‬
‫ﺖ )ﺃ(‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﺣﺼﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺁﻧﻔﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ِﺑَﻨ ْ‬

‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﻄﻨﺔ ﺍﳉﻴّﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ َﻳ ُﻤﺠﱡﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﻟﻌﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻳﺼﲑ ﺫﺍ ﻓﻌﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﺪﺍ ﳍﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﳏﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺩﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ‬
‫‪ ،١٨٦٥‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺟﺪﻝ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﰲ ﺻﻠﺐ ﺍﳉﻤﻌﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟ ﹼﻄّﺒﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺫﻭ‬
‫ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﳍﻠﻮﺳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﻏﺎﺭﻧﻴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻋﻮﻥ ﺃﻣﺜﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﺑﻴّﺮﺟﺎﺭ ﻭﺳﻨﺪﺭﺍﺱ‬
‫ﱄ‬
‫ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻏﲑﻫﻢ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﻮﻥ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻫﻮّﺓ ﻻ ﺗُ ﹾﻘ ﹶﻄﻊُ ﺗﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺗﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻏﺎﺋﺐ ﺃﻭ ﺧﻴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ـ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ـ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﺩﺙ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ؛ ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻈﹼﺎﻫﺮﺗﲔ ﻻ ﲣﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﺭﺟﺔ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ"‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺷﻜﹼﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺃﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ)ﺏ ( ﳘﺎ ﺫﻭﺍ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﲝﺎﻝ ﻋﺎﻣّﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﲟﺬﻫﺐ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺪﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻟﺒﺜﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮﺕ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﻜﹼﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﻨﺖ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﻥ ُﻳ َﻌﺪﱡﻭﺍ ﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ‬
‫‪ ١٨٦٥‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﶈﺎﻓﻈﲔ‪ :‬ﻓﺠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ‪ " :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﲪﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻞ‬
‫ﰐ ﺍﳊﺘﻤﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ"‬
‫ﺑﻔﻜﺮ ﹼ‬

‫ﻚ ﰲ ﺧﻄﺌﻪ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﻊ ﻟﻠﺤﺘّﻤﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬


‫ﺸ ﱡ‬
‫ﻭﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻُﻳ َ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻮﺫ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻴﻞ ‪ .١٨٥٠‬ﻓﻠﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ َﻳ ﹸﻘ ﹾﻞ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ َﻳ ﹸﻘ ﹾﻞ ﺭﻭﺡ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻵﻟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﲏ ﲟﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ‬
‫ﺴ ٍﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻭﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺿﻤ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﺣ ﹼﻞ َﻧ َ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ َﺩ ﹰﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺼﻞ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻧﺴﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺒﻌﺾ ﻫﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﻏﻬﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﻓﺈﺫﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻒ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﻴّﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﺴﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻀﻮﻳّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺗﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ‪،‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳓﻦ ﺑﺸﺄﻧﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ‪ ،‬ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻟﺪﻯ ﻣﻔﻜﹼﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﻣﺘﻐﻴّﺮﺍﺕ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺴﻮﱠﻯ " ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻻ ﲢﻠﻴﻼ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳُ ﹶﻄ ﱢﻮﻉُ ﻣﻨﺎﻫﺠﻬﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ " ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﲝﺴﺐ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻌﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼ ﺳﺎﺫﺟﺎ ﻟﺘﻄﻮّﺭﻩ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﻀﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﺍﺓ ﻣﺒﺪﺋﻴّﺔ ﻟﺮﻭﺡ‬
‫ﺍﻧﻌﺮﺍﺝ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻤ ّﻲ ﻓﺴﻴﻨﺤ ﹼﻞ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺭ ّﺩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺒﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪21‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﳌﻠﻜﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺷﺄﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ‬
‫ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﲰﺎﺀ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺔ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻄﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ ﰲ ﺣﻴّﺰ ﺫﺍ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﲢﺖ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ؛‪ ...‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺪ ﹼﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺳ ّﺮﻳّﺔ ﻭﻋﻤﻴﻘﺔ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﻭﻡ‬
‫ﻭﲣﺘﻔﻲ ﲢﺖ ﺳﻴّﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ ...‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ؛ ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﺴﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﹼﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟ ّﺪﻗﹼﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺼﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻼ ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻨﺒّﺄ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺘﻜﻠﹼﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻫﺘﺰﺍﺯ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺔ َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬
‫‪...‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﳐﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﺧﲑ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻝ ﻭ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺘﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻴﻴﺰ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻠﻴﻖ‪ ...‬ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻃﻠﺒﻨﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﻭﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺭّﺓ ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻜﻮّﻧﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﻨﺎ ﺍﺗّﺒﺎﻋﻪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻗﺴﻤﻪ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻠﺼﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ؛ ﻭ ﻣﻦ َﺭ ﱟﺩ ﺇﱃ َﺭﺩﱟ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺷﺪّﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺴﺎﻃﺔ‪ ،‬ﰒﹼ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻭﻻﺩﻬﺗﺎ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺻﻔﻨﺎ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﺗﻀﺎﻣّﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﺛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻡّ‪ ،‬ﰒﹼ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻭﻗﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺼﻞﹶ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻓﺤﺼﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺃﻣّﻬﺎﺕ ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﺗﻜﻮّﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﻣﺎﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻘﲔ ﻭﻗﺪﺭ‪" .‬‬
‫ﺤ ﱠ‬
‫ﺍ ﹸﳌ َ‬

‫ﺸ َﺮ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪١٨٧١‬‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪّﻣﺔ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻧُ ِ‬
‫)ﺕ( ﻳﻌﺘﺰﻡ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻤ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﺎ ﻟﻨﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ُﺭﻏﹸﻮَﺑ ُﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﻡ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻱ ﺑﲑﺍﻥ ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ َﻧ ُﻌ ﱠﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴّﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ " ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛﻢﱠ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻣﻨﻬﺠ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ) " ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﳐﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﺧﲑ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،(" .‬ﻭﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﻮﺟﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺺ )ﺙ(‪ .‬ﻭﺗﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻭﺻّﻰ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﻟﻠﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻴّﻦ ﻭﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟّﻨ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪22‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺻﻒ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺑﺔ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺘﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺲ ﻣﻨﺬ ﻗﺮﺍﺀﺗﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﺼّﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻋﺎ ّﻡ‪ .‬ﻭﳓ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ِ ،‬ﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺗﻠﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﻯ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻃﻴّﺎ ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﺿﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﻐﻄﹼﻲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﻠﺴﻞ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ ﻟﻸﻓﻜﺎﺭ)‪(١‬‬

‫ﻭﻻ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪﺍ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺒّﺆﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﳒﺰﻡ ﺑﺄﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﳒﺪ ﺑﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ُﻣَﺘ َﻌﱢﻴﻨًﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻣﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﻨﺘﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺑُِﻨ َﻲ ِﺑﻨَﺎ ًﺀ‪ .‬ﻓﺘﻨﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺟﻌﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﺮّﻳﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻗﻔﺰ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺳﺎﺫﺝ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦّ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺳﻮﻯ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ " ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ " ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﳎﺮّﺩ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺐ)‪ .(٢‬ﺇﺫ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺮﻗﹼﻰ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻀ َﻲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺃﹸ ْﺩ ِﺧ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﹸ ِ‬
‫" ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻧﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺧﻴﻂ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﺛﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺫﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ‬
‫ﺤﺪُ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭُﺗ َﺮ ﱡﺩ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ؛ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ َﺗﱠﺘ ِ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺤ ﹼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳍﺒﺎﺋﻴّﺔ)ﺝ( "‬
‫ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺇﺑّﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻋُﱢﻴ َﻦ ﺳﻠﻔﺎ‪.‬‬

‫" ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﺪّﻯ " ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳋﺎ ّﻡ "‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ُﻳ َﺮ ﱡﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻟﻺﺣﺴﺎﺱ "‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪23‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻂ‬
‫ﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺘﻴﻨﺎ ﻗ ﹼ‬
‫ﺠ ْ‬
‫ﻓﺈﺫﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺍ ْﺳُﺘ ْﻨِﺘ َ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﹼ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎ ﻣُ ْﻨَﺒ ِﻌﺜﹰﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﺃﻱ ِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮﺓٍ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ " ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﺒﺎﺋﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﻐﻴّﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺳﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺫﻥ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻫﻮ " ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻷﺭﺟﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ "‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻼ‬
‫ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﹼﻤﺘﻪ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻀّﺨﻤﺎﻥ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻳﺪﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻥ ﺑﺴﻄﺎ ﺑﺴﻄﺎ ﳑ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻲ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ‪:‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ‬
‫"ﻭﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻃﻠﺒﻨﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ"‬
‫ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﺃ ّ‬

‫ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺣﺘّﻰ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ‪ .‬ﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻭﺣﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺬﻕ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻌﻰ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺿ َﻌﺖْ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺞ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ُﻭ ِ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْﻨِﺘ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﱂ ﻳﺮﻡ ﺃﻥ َﻳ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻗ ﹼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﺎﻫﺮ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﺼﺢُ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳋﻠﻂ ﺍﻷﺻﻠ ّﻲ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩّﺍﻩ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺆﺳّﺲ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻫﺠﻴﻨﺔ ﺗُ ﹾﻔ ِ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻃﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﻐﺘﲔ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ؛ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺧﱪﺍﻧﻴّﺘﻪ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺰﺍﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﳑّﺎ ﻟﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﺾ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺐ‪ :‬ﻓﺘﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺳّﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺍﻋﺘﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺸ ﱢﺮ ِﻋ ﱟﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ُﻣ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴّﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﻂ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻳﻬﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﻧﺴﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﻳﺔ ﰲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪24‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﱐ ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﺟﻬﲔ ﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ‬
‫ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻳُ ﹾﺜِﺒﺖُ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ‪ -‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ َﺗِﺒﲔُ ﻟﻨﺎ ‪ -‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﳑﻜﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﺒﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻜﻮّﻧﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻇﻨﻨّﺎﻩ ﻷﻣﺪ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﺧﱪﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺕ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺮﻭﻕ ﲟﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﺄﺓ ﻋﻠﻤﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣُﺒَﺎَﻳﻌَﺎ ٍ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﺪﺏ ﻭﺻﻮﺏ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻘﺼﺎﺀ ﻏﺎﻟﺘﻮﻥ)ﺡ( ﻗﺪ ﺟﻠﺐ ﳍﺎ ﺣﺠﺠﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ١٨٦٩‬ﺇﱃ ‪ ،١٨٨٥‬ﺃﺧﺬ ﺑﺴﺘﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺑﺮﻭﻛﺎ ﻭﻛﻮﺳّﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻛﺴﻨﺮ‬
‫ﻭﻭﺭﻧﻚ ﻭﺷﺎﺭﻛﻮ ﻳﺆﺳّﺴﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻜﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺒﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﻊ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻤﻴّﺰﺓ‪ :‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺮ ﺩﺟﲑﻳﻦ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ .١٩١٤‬ﻭﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ـ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻨﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ)ﺥ( ـ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻏﺒﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺘﺤﻮﺍ ﻣﻮﺍﻃﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ " ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﺭﲡﺎﺝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺃﺣﺪﺛﻪ " ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺗﺮﻧّﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟ ّﺮﻗﹼﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺙ ﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻨﺎﻩ ﺑﻘﻮّﺓ ﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﺍﺯﻥ ‪ -‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺯ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﻍ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﻍ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺫﺍﻋﺖ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺫﻳﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺛﺮ ﺳﺘﲑﻭﺍﺕ ﻣﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﹶﻓ َﺮ ﹶ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺘﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ َﺣ ﱢﺪ ِﻫﻤَﺎ ﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣُ ْﻨَﺒ ِﻌﺚﹲ ﻭﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺠَﺘ َﺰ َﺀﺓﹲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺭﺁﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ‬
‫ﻣُ ْ‬
‫ﲏ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ (3).‬ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﺃﻭﻻﺋﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺑﻘﻮﺍ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺿﻤ ّ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﺮﻭﻣﻮﻥ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ )‪ ، (٤‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻗﺮّﻭﺍ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﻭﺭﺛﻬﻢ ﺇﻳّﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻹﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ‪.‬‬

‫*‬
‫**‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪25‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ ﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮّﻥ ﺭﺃﻳﺎ ﻟﻪ ﳓﻮ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ .١٨٨٠‬ﻭﱂ ﻧﻀﺮﺏ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺩﺓ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻟﻘﺪ ِﺭﱘَ‪ ،‬ﺑﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺷﺘّﻰ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ ﻧﺘﻌﺪّﻯ ﻭﳓﺘﻔﻆ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﰲ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺬﻛﺮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺮّﺋﻴﺴﺔ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺃﻭﺳﻊ‪ ،‬ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻭ َﺣ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ﺗﻌﺎﻇﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻧﻄﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻻﺷﻴﻠﻴﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﻋﻲ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻧﺴﺎ)ﺩ(‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺼﻮﻍ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺳﺄﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ‪ :‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﳌﻼﺀﻣﺔ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ)‪ .(٥‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻟﻨﺮﺍﻩ ﺫﺍ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ َﻧ ُﻌ ﱡﺪ‬
‫ﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺘﺄﻭﻳﻠﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻼ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ُﻣ ْﻌ ﹶﻄﻴَﺎ ِ‬
‫ﻳﺸﻜﹼﻚ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺫﺭّﺍﺕ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﻢ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺴ ٍﺮ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻜﺸﻒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ‬
‫ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﺍ ِﺑﻴُ ْ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﳊ ّﻖ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﺎﳊ ّﻖ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻳﻨﻈﹼﻢ ﻭﻳﺘﻌﺪّﻯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺁﻥ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﺫﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺐ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺄﻥ ُﻧﺼِﻴ َ‬

‫ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﻮّﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮﺕ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺎﺳﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺻﺮﻧﺎ ﳓﺬﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪﻳّﺔ ِﻟﻤَﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺃﺧﻼﻗﻴّﺔ ﺳﻴّﺌﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺆﺩّﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺎﺳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻮﺿﻰ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺆﺩّﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﳊﺎﺩ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﰐ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻗﻮّﻬﺗﻤﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ‬
‫ﻱ ﰲ ﻓﺮﻧﺴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﳏﺎﻓﻈ ّﻲ ﻗﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﳉﺬﺭﻳّﺔ‪ ...‬ﺃﻭﻻﺋﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺆﻣﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻧﺮﻯ‬
‫َﺑ ﱠﻜ ْﺘﻨَﺎ ﰲ ﳎﻠﺲ ﻓﺮﺳﺎﻱ " ﻣﻔﻜﹼﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﻉ‪) ".‬ﺫ(‬
‫ﳍﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﻮﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﲢ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﺲ ﹶﻟَﻴ ْﻨﻌَﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ " ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﳉﺬﺭﻳّﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺘﺔ "‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺭﺟﻮﺍﺯﻳّﺔ ﳌﹼﺎ‬
‫ﺖ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺮﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‬
‫ﺃﻓﺰﻋﺘﻬﺎ ﺛﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻣﲔ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ َﻳ ﱠﻤ َﻤ ْ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻟﻮﻳﺲ ﻓﻴﻠﻴﺐ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟّﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻔﻜﹼﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﲔ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺎﺭﺑﻮﺍ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪26‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺿ َﻊ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻠ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺜﺎﻣﻦ ﻋﺸﺮ ﰲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻻﺕ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﻮ َ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻟﻌﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻃﻦ ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺿﻊ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳّﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﻤﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﺃﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻗﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺎﺳﻴّﺔ ﰲ ‪ ٣٠‬ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻞ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪:١٨٨٢‬‬
‫" ﻫﻞ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻗﺶ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ َﺗ ُﺮ ﱡﺩ ﻣﻠﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‬
‫ﱐ ﻭﺍﻷﻧﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ـ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺭﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﳌﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﲢﺮﻳﻔﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﳍﺎ"‪.‬‬

‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺮّﲰ ّﻲ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﺍﻹﺫﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻔﺮّﻱ ‪ Ferri‬ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺰ‬
‫ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﺒ ِﻄ ﹶﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳌﻨﺎﻓﺴﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ‪:‬‬
‫"ﳓﻦ ﻣﻘﺘﻨﻌﻮﻥ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﰲ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﻟﺪﻳﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﺃﻥ َﻧَﺘَﺒﱠﻴَﻨﻬَﺎ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻴﺴﻬﺎ "‬

‫ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺫﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺣ ّﺪ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲤﺪّﻧﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﻌﺎﺿﺪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴﲔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘّﺨﺬ ﳎﺎﻻ ﻧﻘﺪﻳّﺎ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲡﺎﻭﺯﻫﺎ)‬
‫‪:(٦‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻮﻫﻢ ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻳﻘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﰲ ﻭﻋﻲ َﺭ َﻭ ِﻭ ﱟ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﻬﺪ ﺗﺄﻣّﻠﻲ ﻭﲡﺮﻳﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺤﻬﻬﺎ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺣﺎ ﺑﺼﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﲰﻌﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﳌﺴﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻮﺍ ّﺩ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻄﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ"‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪27‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺺ ﻟﻌﺠﻴﺐ‪ :‬ﻓﻼ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﹼﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟّﻨ ّ‬
‫ﺼﱢﻨﻒٌ ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺒّﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ُﻣ َ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﳍﺎ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻠﹼﻢ ﳍﺎ ﲟﺰﻳّﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻘﻒ‬
‫ﺐ ﺟﻬﺪ ﲡﺮﻳﺪﻱّ؛‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ِﻏ ﱠ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻳﻨﺎﻗﺾ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺧﻠﺖ ﺛﻼﺛﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻨﺮﻯ‪،‬‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺠﻴّﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﻒ ﺃﻭ ﻇ ّﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﻒ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻻ ﻻ ﻣَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﻕ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﺩ ّ‬

‫ﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﺄﺗﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻳﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﳌﺼﻨّﻔﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻻ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺮ ّﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻔﹼﻠﺖ ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻗﺒﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﲏ ﺟﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻮﻛﻴّﺔ ﺍﶈﺎﻓﻈﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺗﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﻟِﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺩﻳ ّ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺧﻠﻴﻂ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﺛﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻞ ﺑﺎﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻓﻼ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻻ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺑﻔﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﺮّﻭﺡ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻳﺸﻮﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﻗﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺒّﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺯ ﳌﺎﺭﻳﺘﺎﻥ‪:‬ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺴﺐ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻷﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﱪﻭﺗﺴﺘﻨﺖ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ُﻋ ْﺪﻧَﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻻ‬
‫ﻱ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ)ﺭ(؛ ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﻓﻜﺮ ّ‬
‫ﱵ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺛﻮﻟﻴﻜ ّﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ‬
‫ﺑﺮﻭﺗﺴﺘﻨ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴّﺒﺐ ﰲ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﱂ ﻧﻄﹼﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄّﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺐ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺇﺩﻣﺎﺟﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻻﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺿﻌﻒ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻴّﻮﺏ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ‬
‫‪ ١٩١٠‬ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪:‬‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺠﺮﻳﺪ‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻏﺮﺿﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﺻﻠﻴّﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﻟﹼﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻓﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪28‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﻭﻛ ﹼﻠ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻣﻨّﺎ ﻻﳝﻜﻨﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﳜﻮّﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻬﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺿﺮﻭﺭ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻮّﺭ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﺍ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩ ﻻﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﻧﺘﺎﺟﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﲏ‪ .‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻞ‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫ﻱ "‬
‫ﺣﺴّﻲ ﻭﺧﱪ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﹸﻓﺠَﺎ َﺀﺓﹰ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻳﺒﺘﻨﻴﺰ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ)‪ .(٧‬ﻭﺍﳊ ﱠﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺪﻯ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻔﲔ ﳚﺎﻫﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﻢ ﺇﻳّﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﺟﻌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺳﻢ‬
‫ﺹ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻢ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﲝﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪،‬‬
‫ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟّﺘﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻻﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎﻩ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻓﺮّﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ‪:‬‬
‫" ﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻳﻠﺤﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺎﻓﺊ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺘﻮﻳﻪ‬
‫ﺴ َﺮ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻫﺎﻣﻠﺘﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﻛﻠﹼﻴﺎ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﹸ ﹾﻗ ِ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﺜﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺤﻠﹼﻰ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮﻛﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻐﻠﻖ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻐﻴﺾ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﻌﺪّﻯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻌﺒّﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺘﺠﺴّﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ‪ )" .‬ﺯ(‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺈﻧّﺎ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻌﻠ ّﻲ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻷﻭّﱄ‪ِ ،‬ﻟﻤَﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻨّﺎ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻛﻠﹼﻴﺘﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﺘﺮﻥ ﺑﺼﻮﺭ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﳝﺘ ّﺪ ﻋﱪ‬
‫ﺴ ﱢﺪ َﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﺑﻴﺪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ " ﻭﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳉﺰﺋﻴّﺔ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ َ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ " ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﻓﺎﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻻ‬
‫ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺃﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻹﺣﻼﻝ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪29‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺌﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﱂ ﺗﺘﻐﻴّﺮ ﻋﻤّﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺻﻮﺭ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﳏﺾ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻮﺍ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻴّﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﻮﺍ‪ ،‬ﺑﻔﻀﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩﻭﺍ ﺇﺩﺧﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﻧﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﺻﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﺮﺩّﺩ‪ ،‬ﻏﺎﻣﻀﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﳊ ّﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﻭ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻩ ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮّﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧّﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺮّﺩ‬
‫ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ)‪ :(٨‬ﻭﻗﺼﺎﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠ ﱠﺮ ِﻭﱠﻳ ِﺔ ﲢﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻘﺺ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﶈﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺼﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺑﺬﻟﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﻌﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﳏﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﺖ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ) ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ( ﻭﺍﻛﺘﺸﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﳌﻜﺬﻭﺑﺔ ) ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ (‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﻓﻮّﺿﻮﺍ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﹼﰒ ﻻﺫﻭﺍ ﲟﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪﻳّﺔ ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻻﻳﺒﺘﱰ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﻭﺏ ﻟﻮﻙ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ‪ :‬ﻻﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺲّ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻬﻢ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ‬
‫ﰊ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻛﺎﻧﻂ ﳍﻴﻮﻡ‪ " :‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻻ ﳒﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﳑﻜﻨﺔ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻋﻠﻴّﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺍﳋﱪ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺔ ﺗﺆﺳّﺴﻬﺎ‪(٩)" .‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ُﻳ ْﺮَﺗﻀَﻰ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺘﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺿ ﱟﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑَﺎ ِﻃ َﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﻌَﺘَﺒﺮُ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟُ َﺆ ﱢﺳ ٍ‬
‫َﻣ ْﺮ ِ‬
‫ﺴﺔﹲ ﺑﲔ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻓﺸﻲﺀ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺅﺳّﺲ‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ﻟﻺﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻣُ َﺆ ﱠﺳ َ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪30‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ) ﺑﻴﺖ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻛﺘﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،( .‬ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﲡﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﳑﻜﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﻮّﻥ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﻤﻞ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻪ ) ﻣﺜﻼ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﻜﹼﺮ‪ :‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻭﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ( .‬ﺇﺫ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ِﻗَﺒ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ)‪ :(١٠‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻛﻮّﻧﺖ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭﻫﻲ ﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ "ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ " ﺃﻭ " ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻹﻣﻜﺎﻥ"‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪.‬‬

‫ﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﲝﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‬


‫ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳّﺔ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﰲ ﺗﻨﺸﺌﺔ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺆﺳّﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﹼﺮﺕ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻧﻄﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﳍﻤﺖ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ؛ ﻭﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﻳﻨﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﺳﺪّﺩﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻏﺮﺿﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ " ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻤ ّﻲ "‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻠﻢ ‪،‬‬
‫ﻚ ﲢﻠﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ؛ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﳓ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﲝﺴﺐ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺑﻼ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺺ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺤ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻩ ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ﹾﻔ َ‬
‫ﺸِﺒﻪُ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺩﺉ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣُ ْﺒَﺘ َﺪﹶﺃ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲤﻌّﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻘﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﻴُ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻹﳒﻠﻴﺰ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻏﲑ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺪﻋّﻢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻬﻧﻀﺔ ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ؟‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻴّﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﳑّﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﺳﻨﺔ‬
‫ﺏﻧ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﹸﻗ ْﺮ ُ‬
‫‪)١٩١٤‬ﺱ(‪:‬‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﻀﺎﻓﺖ ﰲ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘّﻄﻮّﺭ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﻧﺸﺄﻬﺗﺎ ؟‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺮﻓﺔ ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺫﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﺴﺒﺐ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺴﺮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳّﺔ ﺣﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮ ﹼﰒ ﹶﻗ ﱠﺮ ﹼﰒ‬
‫َﺗ َﺰﱠﻳ َﺪ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﻨﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺆﺛﹼﺮﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻣﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﳑﺘﻨﻊ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻋﺎ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ﻳﻌﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪31‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺼ َﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻳﻔﻜﹼﻚ ﻭﻳﺮﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺪﺭﻙ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺜﹼﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍ ﹾﻗﺘُ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﻳﺼﻞ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻪ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻭﺍﻉ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘّﺨﺬ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺼﻮﻏﻬﺎ‪ ...‬ﻭﺍﳋﻼﺻﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺑﻔﻜﺮ‬
‫ﳏﺾ ﺧﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺘﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻏﲑ ﻣﱪﻫﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫"‬

‫ﺺ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺩ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﻋﻤﻠﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬


‫ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﺄﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻧ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻮ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ " ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺮﻓﺔ "‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺪّﻫﺎ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻼﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳊﺪﺳ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻳﻨﻜﺸﻒ ﻟﻠﺤﺪﺱ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧّﻪ "‬
‫ﻗﻮّﺓ "؛ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺊ ﻭﺿﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﻟﺼﻮﺭ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻇﺎ‬
‫ﺷﻴﺌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌ ّﻲ ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻉ‪ " .‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻻ ﺗﺘّﺨﺬ ﺷﻜﻼ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺼﻮﻏﻬﺎ "‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺿ َﻊ‬
‫ﺍﺭﺗﻀﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻣﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻣﺎ ﹶﻗ ْﺒ ِﻠﻴ‪‬ﺎ ﺇﱃ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻥ َﻭ ْ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺣ ّﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ)‪ .(١١‬ﻭﺇﻧّﺎ ﻟﻨﺮﻯ ﻛﻢ‬
‫ﰊ ﺇﱃ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﲡﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺎ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺩّﻯ ﺑﻌﺎﱂ ﻧﻔﺲ ﲡﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﳏﻀﺔ)ﺵ(‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻨﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﻴﻞ ﲨﻴﻌﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﺮﺿﻴّﺔ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻓﻬﻢ " ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻴّﺔ" " ﻭ " ﺗﻨﺴﻴﻘﻴّﺔ " ﻳﺼﻌﺐ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺻﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﲟﺤﺾ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ .‬ﻓﻮﺿﻌﻴّﺔ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ َﺗ ْﻨ ﹶﻜ ﱠ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺳﻠﻜﺖ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻛﺴﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺮﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ‬
‫ﱐ‪.‬‬
‫ﻻ ﻭﺍﻉ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ " ﻇﻬﺮ" ﰲ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺘّﻄﻮّﺭ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎ ﹼ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪32‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ ﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ " ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ " ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻓﺎﺭﻕ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻭﻧﺮﻯ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻮﻳّﺔ ﺣﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺻﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﳕﹼﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺎﺕ ؛ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻫﻀﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻃﻌﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺗﻔﻜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺠ ﹶﻠﺐُ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻄﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺍ ّﺩ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻧﻨﻈﺮ ﻟﻠﻬﻀﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﹸﻛ ﱞﻞ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻼﺑ ّﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩ‬
‫ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﳋﺎ ّﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍ ﹸﳌﺼَﺎﻏﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻀﻮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻏﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﳊﺘﻤﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹾﺫ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ‬
‫ﻱ ﲞﺼﻮﺹ ﻻ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺣﺘﻤ ّﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳊﺘﻤﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﳒﺪ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻳﺒﺘﻨﻴﺰ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﺮ ّﺩ ﻭﻣﺘﻬﺎﻭ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻴﺌﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ ﺣﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ‪.‬‬

‫ﺲ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴّﻘﻮﻁ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺼﻨّﻒ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﰲ‬


‫ﻭﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺪ َﻧ ﹾﺄَﻧ ُ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻠﹼﻞ ﺁﻟﻴﺔ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺗﺴﺎﺀﻝ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﲨﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﲤﻨﺤﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﻭﻫﻮﻳﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪:‬‬
‫"ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﲣﻴّﻠ ّﻲ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ "‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﺹ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻠﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﺘّﻔﻘﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﻢ " ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺎﺫﺏ ﻭﻧﻘﻄﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ "‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰﻏﲑ ِﺣ ْﺮ ٍ‬
‫ﺭﺁﻩ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ " ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ـ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﺑﺘﺔ "‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻨﻔﻊ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻟﺘﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ‬
‫ﳏﺾ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﻳﻌﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻜ ّﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻫﻲ " ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻱ " ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ " ﻓﻬﻲ‪ (١) :‬ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪33‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ؛ )‪ (٢‬ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ " ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺪﺑّﺮ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ " ؛ )‪ (٣‬ﻭﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺫﻫﻨﻴّﺔ " ﻭﻧﺸﲑ‬
‫ﲏ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺍﻷﻗ ﹼﻞ )ﺹ(" ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ " ﺗﻐﻴّﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ " ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻃﻮﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪:‬‬
‫" ﻓﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭُ ِﺟ َﺪ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﻧﺎ ﲟﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﻧﺎ ﺑﻐﲑﻩ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻟﻼﻧﺴﻼﺥ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ‬
‫"‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﺪﺩﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﻣﻌﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺜﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻭﻷ ّ‬
‫"ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ؟ )ﺽ("‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺮﻯ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﻍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﲟﻌﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﺎﺕ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺴ ﱠﺪ َﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻣﻌﺠﺰﺓ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨّﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗُ َﻮ ﱠﺟ َﻪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗُ َ‬
‫ﻧﺒﻐﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺼﺤﻮﺍ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﻝ ﺍﳊ ّﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺑﺸّﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﳒﻠﻴﺰ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ُﻣ َﻮ ﱠﺟﻪٍ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺍﳊﺮّﺓ ﻟﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﻣﻴﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﺑﺘﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ُﻣ َﻮ ﱠﺟﻬَﺔ ٍ‪.‬‬
‫ﱄ "‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﺒﺐ "‬
‫ﲏ "‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﺒﺐ " ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ‪ :‬ﺳﺒﺐ " ﺫﻫ ّ‬
‫ﻻﻭﺍﻉ‪".‬‬
‫ﲏ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ " ﻣﻠﻜﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﻜﲑ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺷﻜﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺛﻠﺔ‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺴّﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫ﻧﺎﻗﺼﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳌﻤﺎﺛﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺟﻨﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻟﻪ‪".‬‬

‫ﱄ ﺃﻭ " ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻔ ّﻲ "‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻓﺼّﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻼ ﻳﺴﲑﺍ ﰲ‬
‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﺒﺐ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻋﺮ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ " ﺍﻟﺘّﻜﺜﻴﻒ"‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ)ﻁ(‪ " .‬ﹼﰒ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﻞ‪:‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪34‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣُ ﹾﻘَﺘ ِﺮَﻧ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺣﺎﺩّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺕ ﻣﻌﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﲤﻴﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺜﲑ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺸّﻌﻮﺭ‪ ...‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻻ ﺫﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻭُ ِﺟ َﺪ ْ‬
‫ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﻌﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺮﻥ ﺑﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﺎﺩّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﲤﻴﻞ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻟﺴﺎﺋﺮﻫ ّﻦ"‬

‫ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﻧﻘﻞ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﻒ ﻣﺮّﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ ﺍﻻﺛﲏّ‪،‬‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺻﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﺘﻘﺎﺭﺏ ﻭﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻣَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﺗﻨﺼﻬﺮ ﰲ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺴّﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﺍﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ‬
‫ﲏ ﺃﻭﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄﹼ؛ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺴّﺒﺒﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺫﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺷﺮﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ َﻣ ْﻨﺪُﻭ َﺣ ٍﺔ ﻟﺮﻳﺒﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻌﻲ ﺍﻟّﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻔﻜﻴﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻧﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‬
‫ﱄ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺗﱪﺯ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻫﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺽ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻫﻮ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﺎﺕ ﻭﻻ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺒ ِﺪ َﻋ ِﺔ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺾ ﻓﺮﺽ‪ .‬ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻮ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﺎﻥ ﱂ ﳛﺘﻔﻞ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﺃ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻔﺴﲑ‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟّﺘﺤﻠﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﳎﺮّﺩﺓ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﺎﻣﻼ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺳّﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻼ‬
‫ﺭﺍﻡ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻥ َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﺤ ﹾﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﺰﻣﻦ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ‪ .‬ﻭ ﱂ َﺗ ُ‬

‫*‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪35‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫* *‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻠﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺜﹼﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﱪﺟﺴﻦ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﹸﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻇﻬﺮﺍ ِﺧ ﹾﻠ ﹶﻔ ﹰﺔ ﺳﻨﱵ ‪ ١٨٨٩‬ﻭ‪ ،١٨٩٦‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﱪﻯ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳋﺼﻢ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺪﻭﺩ ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﺒﺴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺜﺒﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﳍﺎ ؛‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺰﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ؛ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻝ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ؛ ﻭﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮﺓٍ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﻪ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳُ َﻐﱠﻴﺮُ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴﲑ ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﳎﺮّﺩ‬
‫ﻋﻠﹼﺔ َﺗ ﹾﻘﻌِﻴ ِﺪﱠﻳ ٍﺔ ؛ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻋﲔ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ؛ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺻﻠﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺳﻴّﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺗﺸﺎﻓﻊ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﹼﻖ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ‬
‫ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻓﺬ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ َﺗﺪُﻭ ُﻡ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻫﺎ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﻋﻮّﺓ‬
‫ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﲡﺪّﺩ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﲝ ّﻖ ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﺜﲑ ﺃﻭﻻﺋﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪﻭﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻋﻠﻤﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﺗﺘﺤﺪّﺙ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﱪﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻨﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻛﲑﺳﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻦ‬ ‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ " ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ)ﻅ(" ﻭﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺷﻴﻔﺎﻟﻴﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻳﲑ "‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﻠﻮﺳﺔ )ﻉ(‪ ".‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻓﺤﺼﺎ ﹶﻓ ِﻄﻨًﺎ ﻟﻠﺘّﺼﻮّﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﱪﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﻳﻨﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﳌﺼﻄﻠﺤﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻠﻘﹼﻰ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜ ّﻲ ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻀﺎﻩ ﻻ ﻳﺄﺗﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ)‪.(١٢‬‬

‫ﻭَﺑﻌِﻴﺪٌ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻟﻸﻣﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﲝﺘﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﰲ‬
‫ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎﻩ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺤﺺ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘ ّﻲ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻮ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻪ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳋﱪﺍﻧﻴّﲔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺎﻗﻀﻬﻢ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴﻴّﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﺩ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻠﻪ " ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺎ " ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻭ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪36‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻒ ﺑﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺒﺐ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﻲ ﲢ ّ‬
‫ﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺼﺮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ُﺳ ﱢﻤَﻴ ْ‬
‫ﺴﻄﹸﻪُ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ُﻣ ْﺪ َﺭﻙٌ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺲ َﻳ ْﺒ ِ‬
‫ﻼ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹰ‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣُ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ﹰﺔ ؛ ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ)ﻍ(‪(١٣) " .‬‬

‫ﺻﻴّﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻻ ﺑﺈﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ‬


‫ﻱ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﳝﺪّﻫﺎ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺿﺎﻓﺎﺕ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺴﺒﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﲤﺜﹼﻼ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺎﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ َﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻪ " ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻠﺘﺒﺴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﳛﻴﻂ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ)ﻑ("‬

‫ﻓﺈﺫﻥ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻭﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ِﻏﱠﺒﻬَﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺫﺍﻧﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺩّ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺑﺎﺭﻛﻠﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﻓﻊ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﱪﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻫﻲ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪:‬‬
‫" ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﺭﺟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻣُ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ﹰﺔ"‬

‫ﳊ ِﺮﻱﱢ‪،‬‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻩ ﻫﻮ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎ ﹶ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ :‬ﻭﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻌﲑ ﺧﺎﺻّﻴﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪37‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻫﻲ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﻈ ّﻦ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﹸﳌَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻖٍ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ‪،‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻّﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﺎﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﻮﻫﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ‬
‫ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﺣﻴﺚ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺄﻧﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ‪،‬‬
‫ﺴﺮّﻳﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺫﻭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺔ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﳏﺾ ﹶﻗ َﻮ ِﻭﱠﻳ ٍﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ َﺧ ﱠ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ :‬ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‪ ،‬ﻟﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺫﺍﻫﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺛﺨﻮﻧﺔ‬
‫ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺭ ﻓﺘﺘﻠﻘﹼﺎﻩ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻀﺎﺀ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻧﻮﺭ ﳏﺾ‪ ،‬ﻭﻓﻮﺳﻔﻮﺭﺳﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻣﱰﻭﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻣﻀﺎﺀﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺜﻮﺙ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻳﺼﲑ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﺷﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ‬
‫ﻱ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻗﺎﻟﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻀّﻮﺋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻬﻨﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻟﻠﺘّﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﻘﻠﻴﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺿﻮﺀ ﻳﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﺿﻮﺋﻴّﺔ ﺗﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪.‬‬

‫ﺨ ِﺮﺝُ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ‬


‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻹﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﻈﹼﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ِﺑ َﻌ ْﺰِﻟ ِﻪ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﲤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ )‬
‫‪ .(١٤‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻳﺎُﺗﺮَﻯ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ؟‬

‫ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ ﳓﻦ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﲝﺎﺟﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻱ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻀﻊ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻋﲔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ ﻟﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗ ّﺪ ﻏﻴّﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺣ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻢ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻴﺔ)‪ ،(١٥‬ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣَﺎ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪38‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺑِﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣَﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ .‬ﰒﹼ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺠﺄﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺸّﻔﺎﻓﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ؟ ﻭﺇﻻﹼ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﻨّﺎ ُﻧ ِﻘ ﱡﺮ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﹶﻟ ِﻤ ِﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲤﻠﻚ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻛﻴﻒ‬
‫ﻳُ ﹾﻘَﺒﻞﹸ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﻔﺎﻓﻴّﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻻ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻭ ﻻ ﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻭﺍﺕ)‪ (١٦‬؟ ﺃﻣّﺎ‬
‫ﺻﻴّﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻱ ﺑﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﺎ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻲ؛ ﻭﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﹸ ِﺧ ﹶﺬ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭ ّﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺸﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﺎﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ َﺗ ْﻨﺒُﻮ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺴﲑ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﲞﺎﺻّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﺍﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﹼﺷﺨﺼ ّﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﻋﻲ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ‬
‫ﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺩﻳّﺔ ؟ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠ ِﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﺑﺼﲑﻭﺭﻬﺗﺎ " ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ " ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ‬
‫ﻓﺠﺄﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ " ﺍﻷﻧﺎ "‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻔﻈﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ؛ ﻭِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ ؛ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻴّﻨﺔ)‪ " (١٧‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ " ﻗﹸ ِﺮَﻧ ْ‬
‫ﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻤّﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﲜﺴﺪﻱ "‬
‫ﻉ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺫﹶﺍ ٍ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﺒﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ْﺒ ِﺪ َ‬
‫ﺃﻧﺎ " ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻤّﻲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ " ﺑﺘﻤﺜﹼﻼﰐ ﺃﻧﺎ " ؟‬

‫ﻂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻋﺎﻡّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺟﺴﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ‬


‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ " ﺇﻥ ﺃﹸ ْﻋ ﹶ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺭﺗﺴﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﻴّﺰ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺘﻐﻴّﺮ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ‬
‫ﻻ ﻳﺘﻐﻴّﺮ"‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪39‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺨﺼَﺎ ِﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ‬
‫ﺸﱢ‬‫ﻚ ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻠﻴﻞ ﹶﻟ ﹶﻔ ِﻜﻪٌ‪ :‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺒﺎﺕ ﳘﺎ ﺑﻼ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻚ ﳘﺎ ﹶﻟُﻴ ْﺒ ِﻘﻴَﺎ ِﻥ ﻟﻠﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻣﺎﺩّﻬﺗﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ" ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﻤﺎ ﻻ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻱ "؛ ﻭ" ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ " ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﺜﹼﺎﺑﺖ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ "ﺍﳌﺮﻛﺰ ّ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﲞﺎﺻّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓ ِﻠ ﹶﻜ ْﻮِﻧ ِﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺤﻖُ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺫﺍﻬﺗﺎ‪".‬‬
‫ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﺫﺍﺗﺎ " ﺗُ ﹾﻠ ِ‬

‫ﻚ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ؛ ﺇﺫ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻭﻏﲑ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺠﺮِﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻧﻀﻊ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻳُ َﻌ ﱠﺮﻑُ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﺫﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ُﻳ ْ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻠﻘﹼﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺮّﻕ ﺟﺴﺪﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﲝ ّﻖ‬
‫‪:‬‬
‫ﻒ ﻬﺑﺎ "‬
‫" ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﻣﺎ ﺗُ ْﺪ َﺭﻙُ ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻭﺗﺼﻄ ّ‬
‫ﻭ ﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﻳ ﹾﻠﻘِﻲ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺷﻜﻮﻙ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ ُﻣ َﻌﱢﻴﻦٌ ؟ ﺃﻓﻬﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭﻭﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﳑﺘﺎﺯﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ؟ ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﺴﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﺎ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺴﺪَﺍ ِﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﻤّﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺎﺋﻊ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺏ" ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ "‪،‬‬
‫َﺣ ﱢﺪ ﺍﻟ ﱠ‬
‫ﻭﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ُﻭ ِﻋ ﱟﻲ‬
‫ﺨﺼُﻪُ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺘﻮﺍﻩ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻩ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺮﻥ ﺑﻪ ؟‬
‫ﺸﱢ‬‫ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ .‬ﺃﻡ ﻫﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳُ َ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺁﻧﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻕ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﻣﻌﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﺮﻧﺔ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺟﺴﺎﺩ ﻭﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‬
‫ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﻀﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ)‪(١٨‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺎﻛﻢ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺷﻜﹼﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ .‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ؟ ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻔﺮّﻗﻪ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻗﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﳜﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ‪ :‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪40‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻒ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺘﻔﺮّﺩﺓ‬
‫ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻜ ّ‬
‫ﻼ)‪ (١٩‬؟ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺗ ّﺪ ﻃﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﺑﺎﻟ ﹼﻘ ّﻮﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺗﺴﺘﺤﻔﻆ ﲞﺎﺻّﻴﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ َﺗ َﻤﱡﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﺴﺘﺮﺟﻊ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‬
‫ﺣﺎﳌﺎ ﺃﻛ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ؟ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻃﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺑﺬﺍﻛﺮﰐ ؟ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳُ َﻌ ﱠﺮﻑُ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺘﻔﺮّﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﳑﺘﺎﺯ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ)‪ (٢٠‬؟ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺣﺼﻞ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺳﻔﺴﻄﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ َﺩﺓﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻨﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺘﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺿﻠﹼﺖ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﺔ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻞ ﻣﻨﻈﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﺍﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﻣﻌﻪ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﺎﺯﺕ ﺑﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺇ ﱠﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻔﺴﻄﺔ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ؛‬
‫ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳓﻤﻞ ﻟﻮﺣﺔ ﳔﻠﻌﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺪﺍﺭ‪،‬‬
‫ﻼ ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ ) ﻓﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺗﻠﺘﻘﻂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ ﻭﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻓﻴﻪ (‪.‬‬
‫َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻐﻔﻞ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﺘﺒﺲ ﺑﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ُﻣ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛﺔﹰ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﺘﺮﺩّﺩﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ "ﺻﻮﺭﺓ"‪ ،‬ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻣﺘﻼﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ؛ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﺧﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺰﺍﻣﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻟﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ)‪(٢١‬؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺇﱃ َﺗ َﻤﱡﺜ ٍﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺫﻛﺮﻯ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪41‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﲟﺘﺄﺧّﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻟﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻳﺘﻜﻮّﻥ‪ ،‬ﻳﻄﻴﻒ ﲜﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻟﻪ)ﻕ("‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮّﻧﺖ‪:‬‬
‫"ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻴﻒ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﳜﺮﺟﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺣ ّﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ؛ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳛﻔﻆ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻣﻜﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﺯﻣﺎﻬﻧﺎ)ﻙ("‬
‫ﻓﻠﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟّﺘﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺮﺿﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﺃﺑﻌﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﳋﱪﻱ‪ :‬ﻓﻌﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺰﻋﻢ‪ ،‬ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟّﺘ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻠﺘﺒﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺘّﺼﻒ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻳﺘّﺼﻒ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻟﺪﻯ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﻫﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻﺪﻯ ﻳﺘﺒﻌﻪ ﰲ‬
‫ﻼ ﻳﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ :‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﺍﻹﺛﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ؛ ﻭﺃﻣّﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻇ ﹼ‬
‫ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺸّﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺛﺨﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺎﺫ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﻭﲨﻮﺩ‪،‬‬
‫ﺃﻱ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ‪.‬‬
‫"ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ "‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳓﻦ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﺮﺏ‬
‫ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺍﺏ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺧﻮﳍﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﳋﱪﻳﻴّﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮّﻓﻨﺎﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ " ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ "‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﺍﳊﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺒّﻪ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻼﻑ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﺭﺟﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺃﺣﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻮﻙ‬
‫ﺤ ﹶﻘ ﹰﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺠﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣُ ﹾﻠ َ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﻔﻜﹼﺔ َﺑ ْﻌ ُﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺒﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻨﺤﺎﺯﺓ‪ ،‬ﳎﺘﺰﺃﺓ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪42‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﳝﻠﻚ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻫﺎﺗﲔ ﺍﳋﺎﺻّﺘﲔ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳﻬﻴّﺄ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﺳﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﻳﻨﺸﻄﺮ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺁﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻨﺒﺠﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺧﻴﻄﲔ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻇﺮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﺧﻴﻂ ﻳﺘﺨﻠﹼﻒ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺮ ﻳﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻘﺒﻞ )ﻝ( "‬

‫ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ‬
‫ﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺮﻕ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻔﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻜﹼﻜﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﹼﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ )ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻋﺎﻭﺩﺕ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﺿﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ‬
‫( ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﺸﻄﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺑﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻼ ﺁﻧﻔﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺇﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺆﻗﹼﺖ ﻟﻠﺸﻲّﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺎﻋﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺠﺄﺓ ﲤﺜﹼﻼ‪:‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺯﻳّﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻧﺒﺠﺎﺳﻴّﺔ ﻣﻨﺸﻄﺮﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺴّﻔﺴﻄﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ؟ " ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺣﺴّﻲ ﺣﺮﻛ ّﻲ " ﺇﻧّﻪ " ﹶﻗ ﹾﻄﻊٌ‬
‫ﺇﺫ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻱ"‬
‫" ﻳﻮﻗﻌﻪ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠ ّﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﻠﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻼﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻫﻮ " ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ " ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ﺑﺈﻃﻼﻕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ"‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﺿﺮ ﻭﺍﻟ ﱠﺪ ْﻭ َﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ) ﻷ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠ ّﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﺍﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟﻴّﺎ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ( ﻟﻴﻈﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻟﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﺻﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻨﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﳔﺼّﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﻘﺾ‪ .‬ﹶﻓ ﹾﻠَﻨ ﹾﺄ ُﺧ ﹾﺬ ُﻩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﻓﻨﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻧﺸﻄﺎﺭﻳّﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪﺙ ﻣﺎﺿﻴﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻓﺎﻋﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﺎﺿﻴﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻼ ﳏﻀﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﳏﻀﺔ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﺴﻮﺍﺀ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻋﻤﻞ ـ‬
‫ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﻠﻔﻰ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﻮﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺿﺮﺑﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺻ ّﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺿﻌﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﻔﺘﺮﻗﲔ‬
‫) ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ (‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﱠﻟ ﹶﺬْﻳ ِﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪،‬‬
‫ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺭﺩّﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﻻﺫ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻠﻪ ﳍﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﲔ ﺑﺘﻠﻔﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪43‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﻠﻂ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﺯ)‪)(22‬ﻡ( ﻓﻠﻘﺪ‬
‫ﺃﻓﻀﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻷﻥ ﳜﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻠﻔﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺴﻤّﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻧﻮّﺍﻣﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ‪ ،‬ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺑﻨﺎﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺳﻲّﺀ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺇﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻧﺰﻻﻕ ﺃﺑﺪ ّ‬

‫ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺴّﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ ﻳﻌﺪّﻭﻧﻪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻔﻖ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻼ َﻙ ﰲ‬
‫ﺴﹶ‬‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﻟﻴﻀﻄﺮّﻩ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﳛ ﹼﻞ َﻣ ﹾﻄ ﹶﻠًﺒﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻻْﻧ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳊﺴّﻲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﺠﺴﺪ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ؟ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ؛ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﻣُﻮﻋَﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﻣﻮﻋﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﳑّﺎ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻻﻣﻮﻋﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﺫ ﺃﻥ ﺟ ﹼﻞ ﺫﻛﺮﻳﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﻋﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻋﺴﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺮﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ؟‬
‫ﺇﻧّﺎ ﳒﺪ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﺄﻥ‪ ،‬ﻟﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﲔ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻓﺮﺗﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳘﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﳝﻴّﺰ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﲤﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﻴﻴﺰ‪ :‬ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺗﻀﺮﺏ ﺑﺄﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ؛ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻴﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﺎﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ؛ ﻭﳛ ّﺪ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪:‬‬
‫ﻀ َﺮ ﹶﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺍﻧﺒﻌﺎﺙ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺰّﻧﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﱄ ﻷﻓﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺤ َ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﻛﻴﻒ ﺇﻧّﲏ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺃﻣﻠﻚ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺒﻠﻎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‬
‫ﻚﰲ‬
‫ﺴ ِﻠ َ‬
‫ﺤ ﹶﻔ ﹶﻈ ِﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻼﺑ ّﺪ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ َﺗ ْﻨ َ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﻋﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺘﺠﺴّﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻵﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻼﻣَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴَﻨ ِﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﶈﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻼﹼﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻟ ﹼ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪44‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ " ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺴﻠﻚ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ "‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻲ ﺗُ ﹾﺬ ِﻋﻦُ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻁ ؛‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﳏﻀﺔ ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ " ﻧﺎﺻﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ‪ ...‬ﺑﻼ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ"؛ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺇﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﹼﻢ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻬﺗﺒﻂ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﺎﺟﺰﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﺔ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ‬
‫ﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺗﻨﺴﻠﻚ ﰲ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺟﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ؛ ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧُﻮ ِﺩَﻳ ْ‬
‫ﺫﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻓﺘﻨﺴﻠﻚ ﰲ ﳐﻄﹼﻂ ﺣﺮﻛ ّﻲ ﻭﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻓﻌّﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻬﺑﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﲎ " ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ " ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﻛﹼﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ؛ ﻭ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺑﺼﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﲰﻌﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﻧﺔ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ِﺑ ُﻤ ْﺒَﺘﺪَﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻉ ﳌﺨﻄﹼﻄﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮّﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻬﺑﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺎ ﲢﺪّﺩﻫﺎ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻳﻔﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ؛ ﻭِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮﺓٍ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺧﻠﻘﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﻳﺘﺤﺪّﺩ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺘﺄ ﺗﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﻟﻠﺠﺴﺪ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺲ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮّﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﺎ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻓﻌﻠﻴّﺔ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﺪﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻬﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﻣُﻮﻋَﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﻞ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎﺽ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺒﻞ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺘﻪ " ﺗﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ"‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳕﻠﻚ‬
‫ﻋﻨﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﻳﻔﺴّﺮ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻭﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺴﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻭﻕ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻚّ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳛﺪّﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪45‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺹ ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺴﻤﱠﻰ ﺑﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﲤﻠﻚ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌ ﹼﻠﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﺗ َ‬
‫ﺃﻫﻼ ﻷﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪.‬‬

‫ﺼ ٍﻞ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺤ ﱠ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺫﻭ ﻏﻨﺎﺀ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣُ َ‬
‫ﹸﻗﺼَﺎﺭَﻯ ﻣﺎ ُﻳﺮَﺍ ُﺩ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻳﻌﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻧﺴﻼﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﻠﻐﻲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﻡ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﻓﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﱯ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳊﻠﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﻃﺔ ﻟﺘﺮﻳﻨﺎ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻀﻌﻒ ﺗﻮﺗّﺮ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﻌﺼ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻫّﻤﺎﺕ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﺤﻖ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﻓﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﺻﺢّ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﻼ ﺗﻮﺳّﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺮّﻭﺡ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻭﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻣﻠﺘﺒﺴﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ؛ ﺇﺫ‬
‫ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻯ ﻋﺴﺎﻩ ﺃﻥ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺘﲔ ﻣﻌﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻓﻌﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳜﺮﺟﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﻴّﻦ ـ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻼ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﳐﻄﹼﻂ ﺣﺮﻛﻲّ‪َ ،‬ﺗ َﻤﱡﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻞ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ؟‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﻳﺒﺪﻉ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻲّ؛ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳُ َﻌﱢﻴﻦُ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻼﻧﺴﻼﻙ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﺗﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ :‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻓﻌّﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻗﺪ َﻋ ﱠﺪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻴﻮﻻﺕ ﻭﻗﻮﻯ ﺳﺤﺮﻳّﺔ ﻛﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﺬﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺪّﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ َﺗﺮُﻭ ُﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ " ﺗﻨﺪﻓﻊ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻞ " ﻭﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺀ ﺣﺘّﻰ " ﻧﻜﺒﺢ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ "‪ .‬ﻭﻛﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺧﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ "‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﺑﺘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺣﺴّﺖ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺭُ ِﻓ َﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻴﻬﺎ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪46‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ "‪ ...‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﹶﻟﺒِﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻮﺗّﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻳﺼ ّﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺮﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ‪en droit‬‬
‫ﻟﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﺴﻘﻴﻤﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻧﺎﻩ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻟﻠﺠﺴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﺷﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻛﺲ ؟ ﻭﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻋﺴﻰ‬
‫ﺸِﺒﻪُ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ‪ " :‬ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻓﺎﻋﻞ " )‪ (٢٣‬؟ ﺇﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺴﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬ ﰲ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ " ﺷﻄﺤﺎﺕ " ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺄﺗّﻰ ﻟﻠ ﹼﺬﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺷﻬﻮﻬﺗﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠ ّﻲ ؟‬
‫ﻓﺎﳌﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﺴﺐ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺘﻪ)‪(24‬؛ ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﺍﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻲ؛ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺗﺄﺗّﻰ ﻟﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻬﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺴّﻢ ﰲ ﺟﺴﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻻ‬
‫ﻳﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ؟ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ‪َ ،‬ﻣﻜﹶﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ‬
‫ﺴَﺘﻮٍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ " ﻣﺘﺄﻫّﺒﺔ‪ ...‬ﻭﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺮﺻّﺪﺓ ؟ " ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﺨ ﹶﻠ َﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺘّﺼﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ‬
‫ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻧﺸﺎﻃﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻟﺴﻘﻮﻁ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﺗّﺨﺎﺫ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺳﺤﺮﻳّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﻨﺎﻋﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻻ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺒﻌﺚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺒﻴّﻦ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﻼ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳐﻄﹼﻄﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﻟﺘﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ َﺗ َﻤﱡﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﻠﺘﺒﺲ ﺑﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﺎ __ﺑﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺑﺘﺄﻣّﻞ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ َﺗ َﻤﱡﺜ ٍﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺘﻤﺜﹼﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ‬
‫ﻼ ﻟﻺﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻋﺴﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ ﻭﻇ ﹼ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﺠﺲ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ " ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﲡﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻭﻧﺴﻤﻊ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺸّﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﺑﻪ‪ " .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪47‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺤ ﹶﻘ ﹰﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺿﺮﺏ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻼ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ ﻻ ﻳﺘﺄﺗّﻰ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣُ ﹾﻠ َ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻋﺎﻣّﺔ ﺟﺪّﺍ ﻭﻻ ﺗﺘﺒﻊ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻦ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﺟ ّﺪ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻮﺿﻮﻉ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻋﻤﻘﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻈﻔﺮ ﺑﺪﻻﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟ ّﺪﻻﻻﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻋﺴﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺄﺗّﻰ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﰲ‬
‫ﺢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﺎﺽ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ " ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺬﻛﹼﺮ " ﻣﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ)‪ ،(٢٥‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ‪:‬‬
‫ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿ ّﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﻻ ﲢﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ﺃﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﻞ‬
‫ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮـ ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ‬
‫ﻣﺘﺠﺴّﻤﺔ ﰲ ﳐﻄﹼﻂ ﺣﺮﻛ ّﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﳐﻄﹼﻂ ﺣﺮﻛ ّﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺘﺠﺴّﻢ‬
‫ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﺿﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺟﻬﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻔﻖ‬
‫ﰲ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻳﻔﺮّﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻟﻨﻠﻔﻰ ﰲ ﺻﻤﻴﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺗﻪ ﺍ ﹸﳌ َﻤ ﱢﻮ َﻫﺔِ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻻ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﺭﺟﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻬﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻣﻴّﺰ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺃﹸ ْﺟِﺒ َﺮ ﻷﻥ ﳜﻠﻂ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﻓﻌﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻓﺒﻘﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺿﻄ ّﺮ ﻷﻥ ﻳﺘﺼﻮّﺭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻱ َﺷ ْﻲﺀٌ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﺪ‪ ،‬ﹶﺃ ْ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﺭﺏ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﳏﺎﺭﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﳍﺎ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻔﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛ ﹼﻞ َﻣ ْﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﲟﺼﺎﺩﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳑّﻦ‬
‫ﻳﻀﻊ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸﻲّﺀ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻨﺘﺒﻪ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺴّﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﺩﺍﺑﺮ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪48‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳّﻊ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺮّﺟﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﱪﻫﻦ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﺫﻥ ﻗﺪ ﹶﺃ ﹶﻻ ﹶﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﺍﻡ ﻷﻥ ﳜﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﺒﺜﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺻﻨﻊ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺃﺑﻘﻰ ﰲ ﺻﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺪّﳝﻮﻣﺔ ﺍﶈﻀﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺗﻠﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺣﻄﺎﻡ ﺳﻔﻦ ﰲ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻴ ّﻢ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‪.‬‬

‫ﺾ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﳒﺪ ﻧﻘﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﺎﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﻘ ّ‬
‫ﺠ ﱠﺮ ِﺩﻫَﺎ‬
‫ﰐ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﲟﺎ ﳘﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟ ﹼﻠﻴّﻨﺔ‪ :‬ﹶﻓِﺒ َﺰ ْﻋ ِﻤ ِﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ِﺑ ُﻤ َ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮ ﹼ‬
‫ﻻ ﲤﻠﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺳﺤﺮﻳّﺔ ﲡﺬﺏ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺂﻣﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻨﺴﻠﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ؛ ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻓﻬﻮ ﳝﺘ ّﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ‬
‫ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﺸﺄﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻠ ّﻢ ﺟﺮّﺍ ‪ :‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻳﻨﺒﻮﻉ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺎﺑﻪ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﺗ ّﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﺗﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﺠﺴﺪ ﻭﻟﺬﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣّﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺛﺮﺍ ﻟﺘﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳّﺔ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺵ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ُﺗﺘَﻌ ﱠﻘ ﹸﻞ ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﳊﺎﻟﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ُﺗﻌَﺎ ُ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺷﺘّﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻻﺕ ﳑّﺎ ﻳﺆﺳّﺲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴّﺘﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻻ‬
‫ﻳﺸﺮﻉ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻜﻮّﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺗﻠﻒ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﺘّﻰ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄِﻲ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ‬
‫ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ؛ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻨﺎ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻨﺤ ﹼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ِﺑَﺘﹶﺄ ﱡﺧ ٍﺮ‪:‬‬

‫" ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﻣﺮ ﺃ ّﻭﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﺪﺃ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻷﻥ‬
‫ﺗﻀ ّﻢ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﺒﻪ ﻋﻮﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﻄﺒﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﺠﺰّﺋﺔ) ﻥ("‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺰﺋﺔ ؟ ﻓﺎﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﻟﹶﻌﻈﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺮﻯ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺮﻧّﺢ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻄﺒﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ :‬ﻗﻄﺐ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺮّﻑ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ‪،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪49‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻗﻄﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ؛ ﻭﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻻﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺬﻛﹼﺮ‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻘﹼﻞ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﻌﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻄﺐ ﻵﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻣﺘﻨﻘﹼﻼ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻣﺘﻮﺳّﻄﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ ﲤﻄﹼﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﺄﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻂ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺎ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﹶﺃَﺑﺪًﺍ ﰲ ﲤﺎﻣﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ‬
‫ﺞ ﺃﻭ ﻳُ َﻤ ﱢﻄ ﹶ‬
‫ﺸﱢﻨ َ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳُ َ‬
‫ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﳜﺮﺝ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ؟‬

‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻀﻰ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻛﻈﻠﹼﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﻬﺗﺎﻭﻯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻭﻫﻲ ُﻣ ْﻨﺤَﺎﺯٌ‬
‫ﻬﺑﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﻦ ﳏﻴﻄﻬﺎ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻮﺣﺔ‪ :‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺎﻟﻀﺪّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻀﻤّﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺗّﺮ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‬
‫ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﻻ ﻣﺘﺠﺰّﺃﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻠﺒﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺸﺘّﺖ ﻛﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﺧﻰ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﺒﻴّﻨﺔ؛ ﻓﻠﺴﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﺍﻷﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﺮﻛﹼﺐ ﺗﻨﺴﻠﻚ‬
‫ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺒﺠﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗُ ﹶﻜ ﱢﻮﻥﹸ ﻣﻌﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪ ،‬ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﻧُ ِﻈ َﺮ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﻻ ﺗﺘﺠﺰّﺃ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﻨ ﹶﻈ َﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺒﺔ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ؛ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻧُ ِﻈ َﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺮّﻛﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﳊ ِﺮ ﱢ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﻨ ﹶﻈ َﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﹼﺐ‪ .‬ﻭ ﹶﻛ ْﻢ ﺑِﺎ ﹶ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻟﻺﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪50‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﻣﻌﲎ‪ ،‬ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ‪ " ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺰﺋﺔ "‪ ،‬ﻭ " ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ "‪ ،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﹼﰒ ﺃ ّ‬
‫"ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﻜﻴﻚ"‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳚﻮﺯ‬
‫ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ؟ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺿﻄ ّﺮ ﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺑﻴّﻨﺔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺁﻥ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻼ‬
‫ﺃﺟﱪﺗﻪ ﻷﻥ ﳜﻠﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﻭﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻱ َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺨﺰﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺤﺎﺯﺓ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﻊ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻨﻮّﻉ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻷﳕﺎﻁ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻠﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﺜﹼﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﲟﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﺗّﺮ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﺯ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻛﻤّﻴﺔ ﺍﳍﺒﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺿﻤّﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺘّﻰ؛ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ‬
‫ﻱ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ‬
‫ﻚ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻳﺘﺼﻮّﺭﻩ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ّﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻋﺰّﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻔ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‪ :‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻧﺼﻬﺎﺭﻳّﺔ ﳍﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦّ‪،‬‬
‫ﺤ ﹶﻔﻈﹰﺎ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺒﺪﻝ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﱐ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺮﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻔﻠﺢ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﰲ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﳘﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﺳ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﳌﻜﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻫﻲ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳌﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﻧﺼﻬﺎﺭﻳّﺔ ؟ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﹼﰒ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻨﺘﻜﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻐﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻋﻦ " ﺍﻧﺼﻬﺎﺭ" ﻟﻠﻬﺒﺎﺀﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﻮ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺸﻐﻞ‬
‫ﺣﺠﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻐﻴّﺮﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧُ ْﻨ ِﻘﺾُ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ؛ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻱ ﺣ ّﻖ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳍﺒﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺼﻬﺮ ﰲ‬
‫ﳒﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻓﺬ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ؟ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ ِﻟﻤَﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻣﻮﺣّﺪ‪ .‬ﺃﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳜﺘ ّ‬
‫ﺃﺳّﺴﻨﺎ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻨﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ِ ،‬ﺇﺫﹰﺍ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﺪﺍ؛ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪51‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻧﻀﻤّﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺘﺞ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻓﺴﻴﻔﺴﺎﺋﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺤﺮّﻙ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﹶﺃﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﻛﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﺻﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﲰّﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺴّﻔﻠﻰ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﳏﺾ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﺔ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻭﺩ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳝ ّﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ‬
‫ﳛﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﻤﻴّﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ‬
‫ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻧﺒﺴﺎﻃﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ " ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻓﻌﻠﻪ ﺣﺘّﻰ ُﻳﻌَﺎ َﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺸﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ "‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ " ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺯﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﻛﺲ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻱ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺒﺴﻄﻪ ﰲ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ)ﻩ( "‬

‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﻥ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺗﺴﻌﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺪﻯ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻧﺴﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻀﺪّ‪ ،‬ﳚﻮﺯ " ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ‬
‫ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﺜﹼﻒ ﰲ ﲤﺜﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﻂ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺘﺠﺰّﺃ "‪ .‬ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﻦ ﻧﺰﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﺸﺬﹼﺑﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺄﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺘﻜﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮّﻥ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﳐﻄﹼﻄﺎ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺃﻥ ﻧﱰﻝ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻨﻤﻸ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺴﺎﻩ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻄﺮّﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻐﻴّﺮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﰲ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﲢﻘﹼﻘﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺴّﺮ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ُﻳ ْﺒَﺘ َﺪﺃﹸ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ؛ ﻓﺎﻟﻠﹼﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﳉﺪّﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﺄﺗّﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ‪.‬‬
‫ﹼﰒ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ‪:‬‬

‫ﲏ"‬
‫"ﻓﺈﱃ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪52‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺭّﺥ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ‪ .‬ﺃﻓﻠﺴﻨﺎ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻨﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻟﺮﻳﺒﻮ؟ ﻓﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﱂ ﻳﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﳑّﻦ ﻳﺮﺿﻰ ﺑﺘﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺎﻣﺪﺓ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮّﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮﻛﻨّﺎ ﳑّﻦ ﻳُ ْﺪ ِﺧﻞﹸ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺔ ﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴّﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﺎﱂ‬
‫" ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ"‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺳﻴﺼﲑ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺼﺮّﻑ ﰲ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺔ ؟ ﺃﻭ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ‬
‫ﻣﻊ ﺻﻼﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟ ﱢﻠﻮَﺍ ﹸﺫ ﺑﺎﻟﺴّﺤﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ " ﲡﺎﺫﺏ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻓﺮ "‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺴّﺮ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻲ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻌﺮّﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺴﻠﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻨﺢ ﺇ ﹼﻻ " ﻓﺴﻴﻔﺴﺎﺀ "‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﻴّﺮ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴﲑ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻣﻨﺼﻬﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﺰﺍﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺴّﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ؟ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ‬
‫ﺤﺚﱢ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻦ " ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺎﺫﺏ ﻭﻧﻘﻄﺔ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ِ‬
‫ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْ‬
‫ﻂ ﻻ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ؛ ﻭﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ " ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﹶﻗ ْﺒ ِﻞ ﺍﳌﺨ ﱠﻄ ِ‬
‫ﻱ ﻗﻮّﺓ‬
‫ﺼﱠﻨ ﹶﻔ ﹰﺔ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﻴّﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻟﺒﻌﺾ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻣُ َ‬
‫ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺳﺤﺮﻳّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ " ﺍﻟ ﹼﻘﻮّﺓ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻄﻴﻔﺔ " ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗُ َﺪﱢﺑﺮُ ﺑﺎﻷﻭّﻝ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺼﺪﺭ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﻼ ﺗﻮﺳّﻂ‪ ،‬ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﻌﻄﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺘﺎﺋﺞ‪ .‬ﻭﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻻﺑ ّﺪ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻏﻴّﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺄﺓ ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﺧﻠﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺃ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪53‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﺣ ﹼﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﻨﻊ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻗﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺎﻓﻌﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻃﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻓﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺄﺕ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺘﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺎﺩﻯ ﲝﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ‪ :‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺒﺎﺷﺮ ﻋﻠﻢ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮﱂ ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﱂ ﻳُ ْﻐِﻨﻬَﺎ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻃﺎﳌﺎ ﻛﺮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺪّﻋﻮﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺣﺪﺱ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺪﻟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻗﺒﻠ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻠﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﲝﺬﺍﻓﲑﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻼ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻜﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻣّﺎ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ‬
‫ﺳﻘﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﻹﺛﺒﺎﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻻ ﺃﺧﲑﺍ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﻣﻔﺘﻘﺮ ﻟﻄﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﻮﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺰﻭﻳﺪ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﱰﺩ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻇ ﹼﻞ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺘﺮﺩّﺩﺍ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﳏﺎﺿﺮﺗﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﻓﺮ ﻭﺍﻟ ﹼﻄﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺧﻠﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻗﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣﻴّﺔ ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔ ّﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ " ﻣﺘﻮﺳّﻄﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺑﺴﺎﻃﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ﻭﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﺆﻭّﻟﺔ ﳍﺎ "‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻇﻬﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺳّﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂ " ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻧّﻪ ُﻳﺮَﻯ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺣﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﱐ ﻭﳎﺰّﺀ؛‬
‫ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺭ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ ﳌﺴﻪ‪ ".‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘﺮﺍﺀﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﻣﺪﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻪ ﻣﻜﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺗﺸﻨّﺠﺎ ﻭﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺩﻧﻮّﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ‪ " :‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺘﻄﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﻘﺒّﺾ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳُ ْﺪ ﹶﻓﻊُ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳓﺪﺍﺭﻩ"‬

‫ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻓﻜﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﲢﺪّﺙ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﳝﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﲢﻔﹼﻈﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﱄﹼ‪،‬‬
‫ﲑ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻤﻰ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ‬
‫ﻷﻥ ﻳُ ِﻌ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺜﺒّﺖ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺳﺒﻞ ﺇﳊﺎﻗﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪54‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻼ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‬
‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﺎ ﻓﺸﻞ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻌﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀﻩ ﺣ ﹼ‬
‫ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ " ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﺙ‬
‫ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻴﻼ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﲢﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﺗ َﻌ ﱡﺪ ﺗﻴّﺎﺭﺍ ﻓﻜﺮﻳّﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﺅﻟﻴّﺔ ﺳﺎﺫﺟﺔ ﻭﺳﻴّﺌﺔ ﺍﻟّﻨﻴّﺔ ﺗﺘﻮﻫّﻢ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴّﺔ ﺍﻷ ّﻡ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺣﻠﹼﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺫﻭّﺑﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﻋﺪﳝﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﺠﺎﺯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻀﻊ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﲔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﻭﺍ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﻢ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﳜﻠﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻨﻌﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﻠﹼﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺒﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ) ﻭ( ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺴﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺤ َﻲ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺸﺄ ﻭﻬﺗﻠﻚ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﱐ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺟﻬﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ َﺗ ْ‬
‫ﻭﳍﺎ " ﺷﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ " ﻭ " ﻏﺮﻭﺑﺎﺕ " ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﱪ ﻭﺗﺘﺰﻳّﺪ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺇﻣّﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻜﺎﺋﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﻉ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺳﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺘﺰﻳّﺪ ﻭﺗﻨﺤﻮ ﳓﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮّﺩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﳓﻮ‬
‫ﺿﺮﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﻔﺮّﺩ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺧﻠﻌﻬﺎ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻟﻨّﻬﺎﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺼﻮﻯ ﻟﺘﺰﻳّﺪﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﹼﻔﺖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻖ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺬﹼﻭﺍﺕ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﺖ ﻣﻴﻼ ﻣﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﳉﻬﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﺘّﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺒﻖ ﺍﻹﻳﻨﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﹼﻲ‬
‫ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ َﺗ ﱠﺪِﺛﺮُ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ‬
‫ﳑﻜﻨﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﲢﻘﹼﻘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳛﺼﻞ ﰲ‬
‫ﺯﻣﻨﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ :‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺇﻓﻨﺎﺀ ﳏﺾ ﻭﳎﺮّﺩ ﻟﻸﻭﱃ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻟﻠﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﳘﺎ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻗﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻼﻣﺴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﳊﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﺗﲔ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺘﲔ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ‪.‬ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻮﺍ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﲔ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻗﺒﲔ ﺍﻟﻌ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌ ّﺪﻳّﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻪ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪55‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺤﺪّﺙ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺘّﺼﻠﺔ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻯ ﺗﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺪﺭّﺟﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﻌﺪﻧﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺘﺰﻳّﺪ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﺻّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ‬
‫ِﺭ َﱘ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺒﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﹼﻴﺔ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻭﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻋﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺮﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﲝﺘﻤﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺣﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﺎﺓ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﻨﺎ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﲟﺜﻞ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﺩﺩﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﳎﺎﻧﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻗﺪ ﺫﺍﻋﺖ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺫﻳﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﻣﻮﺍ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳّﻄﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻚ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﶈﺾ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﶈﺾ‪ .‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺭﻳﻔﻮﻟﺖ ﺩﻱ ﺃﻟﹼﻮﻧﺎﺱ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺄﺛﹼﺮﻭﺍ‬ ‫ﺃﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ؛ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻠﺪﻭﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺑﺄﺭﺍﺀ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻄﻲ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻓﺖ ﰲ‬
‫ﱐ ﳎﺎﻻ ﻣﻼﺋﻤﺎ ﻟﺘﻄﻮّﺭﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻗﻮّﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻔﻆ ﺑﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ " ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂ " ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻊ ﻛﺎﻧﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺃﺑﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻟﻸﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﲨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺃﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﺴﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ " ﺩﳝﻮﻥ" ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﻓﻼﻃﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺸﺄﹸ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﳕﻄﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﳘﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﳚﺘﻤﻌﺎﻥ؛ ﻓﻬﻮ‬
‫ﻓﻠﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﺳّﻂ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳُ ْﻨ ِ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻌﺪّﻯ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﳛ ﹼﻠﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻤﻴﻤﻪ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺻﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ‬
‫ﻚ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ‬
‫ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻠﻴﻄﺎ ﻭﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎ ﳎﻤّﻌﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺸ ّ‬
‫ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ َﻣ ْﻤ ﹸﻠ ﱞﻮ ﻛﻠﹼﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺔ؛ ﻭﻃﻮﺭﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻘﲑﺓ ﺟﺪّﺍ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻫﻴﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻋﻈﻤﻲّ؛ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺻﻴﻠﺔ‪َ ،‬ﺑ ِﺮﱠﻳﺔﹲ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻮﺍﺣﻖ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﺳ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺮﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺆﻭّﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳّﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪56‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻠﻴﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺘﻄﻮّﺭ ﳓﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ؟ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﳓﻦ‬
‫ﻓﻼ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﺮﺍﺀﻯ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﲡﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻬﺗﺬﻳﺐ ﻭ ﹶﻗ ﱞﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﻟﻠﺨﻄﺄ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ‪ ،‬ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﳋﻄﺐ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺒﺰﻋﻤﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺣﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﻫﻞ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻃﻮﺭ ﰲ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﹼﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻡ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺑَﺎ ِﻃ َﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ؟ ﻭﺣﺴﺒﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺼﻔﹼﺢ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻻﺕ‬
‫ﺕ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﹸ ﹾﻓ ِﺮ َﺩ ْ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﻓﻬﻲ ﱂ ﺗﻔﻘﺪ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﻫﻲ ﱂ ﺗﻔﻘﺪ ﳏﺘﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ُﻣ ْﻨَﺒ ِﻌﺜﹰﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺒﺖ ﻟﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻏﲑ‪ :‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺴﺘﻤ ّﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﺴّﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻚ ﻳﺘﻨﻘﺾ ﹼﰒ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﻜﹼﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﻥ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧﻠﹼﺼﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺘّﺨﺬﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﻔ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺿﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﻓﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ :‬ﻭﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪﻣﻜﹼﻨﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﺴﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻋﺔ ﻟﻠﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻭﻓﺠﺌﻴّﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺇﺑﺪﺍﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻫﻞ‬
‫َﺟ َﻌ ﹾﻠﻨَﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻤّﺎﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ‬
‫ﺃﻛﺜﺮ؟ ﺇﺫ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﺄﺗّﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺪّﺩ ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﺋﻢ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﺄﺗّﻰ ﳍﺎ ﺗﻜﻴّﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﺋﻢ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻫﻮﻫﻮ ؟ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺰﻋﻤﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻷ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﺘﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﻓﺎﻋﻞ ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ‪ .‬ﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ؟ ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﳒﻴﺐ‬
‫ﻫﻞ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳏﺴﻮﺱ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫؛ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻀّﲑ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻻﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺴﻮﺳﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺣﺴﺒﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ‬
‫ﺨَﺘ َﺰﻝﹸ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﲪﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺧﺸﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺎﺩّﺍ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻙ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺨَﺘ َﺰﻝﹸ ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻁ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻ ﺗُ ْ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪57‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻂ ﻗﺪ ﻻﺣﻆ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﺍﶈﺾ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﻋﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺒﺪﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﲞﺎﺻّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﻮﺳﻨﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﺴِﺒ َﺮﻫَﺎ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺷﻚّ‪ ،‬ﻷﺷ ّﺪ ﻟﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻗﺪّﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ َﻳ ْ‬
‫ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﺘﻈ ﹼﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﻨ ﹶﻔ ﹶﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺘﻈﺮﻫﺎ؛ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ‪ ،‬ﻟﺴﺒﺐ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻔﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﻤﻞ ﺗﻜﻮّﻬﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻦ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻔﺤّﺼﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﱪﻩ‪ :‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻤﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﳍﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻛﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ؟ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ‬
‫ﻭﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﺣﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﻴﻠﺔ ﻟﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻀﺒﺎﺏ ﺧﻔﻴﻒ ﺣ ّﻲ ﻳﺘﻐﻴّﺮ ﺑﻼ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀّﺒﺎﺏ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻌﺪﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ُﺭ ْﻣﻨَﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳒﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﳎﺎﻧﺴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳒﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﻔﹼﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﺤﺮّﻛﺔ ﻭﺷﺒﻪ ﺷﻔﹼﺎﻓﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻨﱪﻱ ﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺑﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﻧﺴﻤﻊ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺠﺮُﻭ ﹶﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻒ ﻭﻣﺘﺤﺮّﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺮﻯ ﺃﻧّﻜﻢ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﺗ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺳﻴّﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺸ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﺤﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﻜﻠﹼﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺸ ﹼﻔﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻧﺘﻢ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻻﳚﺐ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻤﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻄﻠﻘﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻜﻢ ﲡﺮﻭﻬﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺇﺟﺮﺍﺀ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎﺩﻣﺘﻢ ﺃﻧّﻜﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﲡﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪّﺍﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺑﺘﺼ ّﺮﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﳏﺾ ﻭﳎﺮّﺩ ﻫﻮ ﳝﻜﻨﻜﻢ ﺃﻥ ﲡﺰﻣﻮﺍ ﲟﺠﺎﻧﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴّﻨﺘﻤﻮﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻦ ﳚﺪﻱ ﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻋﻀﻮﻳّﺔ ﺣﻴّﺔ ‪ :‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻜﻢ ﱂ ﺗﺮﻓﻌﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﺗﻌﺘﻘﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻀﻮﻳّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ُﲟ ْﻌِﺘ ِﻘﻬَﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﺎﺫﺑﻴّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﺣﻴّﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪58‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ﻓﻬﻮ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻨﻴﲔ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻟﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻣﺎﺯﻟﻨﺎ ﻧﺼ ّﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﻨﻴﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﺒﺎﻋﺪﻳﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻠﻮﻻ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻄﺎﺕ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﻂ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﻴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﻭﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺇﱃ ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺤ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻄﻴّﺔ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻜ ّﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﻍ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ‬
‫ﺖ ﺻﻮﻏﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻻﻧﺪﺛﺮ ﻣﻌﲎﺍﳌﺨ ﹼﻄﻂ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺘﻢ ﺗﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻮﺻِﻴ َﻐ ْ‬
‫ﺼﺮٌ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻴّﻦ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺨَﺘ َ‬
‫ﲤﺜﹼﻞ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﹼﺗﻌﻴّﻦ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﳑﺎﻫﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳّﺔ ﺍﶈﻴﻄﺔ ﺑﻨﺎ؛ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺗﺴﻤّﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ِﻟ َﻢ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؟ ﺃﻓﻠﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﻓﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺼﺮُﻭ ﹶﻥ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﺦ‬
‫ﲡﻌﻠﻮﻥ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮﺓ ﻗﺴﻤﺎ ﲝﺎﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻜﻢ ُﺗ ﹾﻘ ِ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﺎﺩﻗﺔ ﻟﻸﺷﻴﺎﺀ ؟ ﻓﻠﻌ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻧﺴﺨﺎ ﻟﻸﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻻﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ‪ .‬ﻓﺤﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺂﻝ ﺍﳌﺨﻄﹼﻂ ؟ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻟﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺒﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻳُ َﻌ ﱢﺮﻑُ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺍﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﻓﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻄﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﲡﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﳍﺎ‪.‬‬

‫*‬
‫* *‬

‫ﳘﻴّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ "‬


‫ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺎﳍﺎ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﲑﺍﺕ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺃ ﹼ‬
‫ﱐ ﺍﳌﺰﻋﻮﻡ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺷﻬﺪﻧﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ " ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮ ﹼ‬
‫ﰐ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺎﺭﺏ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺸﺮ ‪ ،‬ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ،١٩٠١‬ﺃﲝﺎﺙ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺧﱪﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺒﻌﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﲣﻠﹼﻰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻬﻧﺎﺋﻴّﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺖ ﺑﻨﺸﺮﻩ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ١٩٠٣‬ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﺤﺺ ﺧﱪ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ " ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺘﺐ‬
‫ﻟﺴﻨﺔ ‪١٨٩٦‬؛ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺁﺥ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ١٩٠٥‬ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ " ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﺭﺍﺩ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪59‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻮﻟﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ١٩٠٧‬ﺇﱃ ‪ ١٩٠٨‬ﻓﻘﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺴّﺮ ﺃﲝﺎﺙ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺧﱪ ّ‬
‫ﻛﺘﺐ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺑﺄﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻧﺸﺮﺕ ﻣﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ١٩٠٦‬ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﺔ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺒﺴﺔ ﻭﺃﻋﻄﺖ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻟﻠﻤﺠﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻣﺔ ﺏ"‬
‫ﰲ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﺍﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ‪" .‬‬

‫ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺪﺭ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ‬
‫ﰐ ﰲ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺗُ ِﺬ ﱢﻛ َﺮ‬
‫ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﻭﺩﺕ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻜﺎﺭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﺝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﻓﺮّﻱ ﻭﲨﻴﻊ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴّﻲ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺕ ‪ .٨٠‬ﻭﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻣﺘﺤﻴّﺰﻭﻥ ﻣﺎﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺮّﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﻳﻦ‪ :‬ﻭﳘﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺃﺣﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ ـ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ُﻳﻌَﺎِﻳﻦُ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠﺔﹰ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺮّﻏﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﲤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ُﻣَﺘ َ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺪّﻬﺗﺎ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﳍﺎﻣّﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﻨﻮﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻣﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺪﻭﺍ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﺗﻀﺒﻂ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟ ﱢﻠ َﻮﺍ ﹸﺫ ﺑﻠﻴﺒﺘﺰ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻭﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ‬
‫ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﻓﺠﺄﺓ ﻳﻘ ﹼﻞ ﺇﳝﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻃﺒّﺎﺀ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺸﹶﺌﺖْ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﺸﻜﻮﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ؛ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺍ ْﻋﺘُ ِﻤ َﺪ ْ‬
‫ﹸﺃْﻧ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻭﺻﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺱ ﻣﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺔ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻔﻊ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺎﻭﺩﺕ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﳊﺒﺴﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﺯ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺑﻴّﻨﺖ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﲣﺮﻳﺐ ﲣﺮﻳﺐ ﳌﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﳐﺼﻮﺹ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺒﺴﺔ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﻛﻠﹼﻲ‬
‫ﺠ ٍﺰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳊﺒﺴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺪّﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ِﻟ َﻌ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺤﻮ ﺑﺘﺆﺩﺓ ﳓﻮ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﺪّﻣﺎﻍ‪ .‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﳕﻴّﺰ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪60‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺤ ﱠﻞ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﻓﺴﻴﻔﺴﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﺋّﻴﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﻍ ﻗﺪ ﻏﻴّﺮﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺠﻠﱠﻰ ﳍﺎ ﺑﻼ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠﺔٍ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻗﺪ َﺗ َ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺪﺱ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﹶﺫﻭَﺍﺕٌ ﻗﺪ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﰲ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻏﲑ ُﻣَﺘ َ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺳّﻂ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ " ُﻭ ِﻋ ﱞﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ "‪ ،‬ﻭ" ﺑﺘﻮﺗّﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﻋﻲ‬
‫ﲏ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ "‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﺼﻴﺺ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻗﺮّﺕ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴّﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﺤﺮّﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺖ َﻣ ﹾﻘﺴُﻮ َﺭ ﹰﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺸﺨّﺺ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﺸﺨّﺺ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻓﺘﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻣُ ْﺒَﺘ ﹶﻜ ِﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﻼ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺳﻄﺔ؛ ﻭﹶﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻧُ ﹶﻔ ﱢﻜ َﺮ ﻭﹶﺃ ﹾﻥ َﻧ ْﻌ ﹶﻠ َﻢ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻔﻜﹼﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ ﻷﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﻥ‪ .‬ﺁﻧﻔﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺷﺒّﻬﻨﺎ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻭﺃﺧﻼﻓﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﺎﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻲ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻫﻮﰐ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﻠﻪ ﻳﻨﺎﻟﻪ‬
‫ﺼ ﹶﻄﻔﹶﺎﺓﹲ‪ .‬ﻭﺻﺪﻕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﻔﺎﺓ‬
‫ﺗﻔﻜﹼﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﰲﹼ‪ ،‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺗﻨﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﱪﺓ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﰐ)‪( ٢٦‬‬
‫ﻓﻀﺎﻣﻨﻬﺎ " ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺟﻴﻄﻮ ‪" cogito‬ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭ ﹼ‬

‫ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺪﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺴﻂ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻱ ﻓﻘﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﺠﻴﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﳒﻠﻴﺰﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﳌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﱪ ّ‬
‫ﺍ ْﺳُﺘﻔِﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﳓﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻭﻡ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﳌﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺼﺪﻭﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺧﺎﻟﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺒّﻘﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪61‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﳊ ﱠﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﳍﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻏﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺎ ﺑﺈﻃﻼﻕ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ‬
‫ﻭﺍ ﹶ‬
‫ﻳﺮﻭﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﻴﲔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻨﺎ ﺻﺎﺭﻣﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻗﺪ ﲣﻠﹼﻘﺖ ﺑﺘﺄﺛﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﳍﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺍﺣﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻘﺪﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻓﻴﺎ ﻟﻠﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﲜﻤﻴﻊ ﺃﳕﺎﻃﻬﺎ)‪(٢٧‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﲟﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺒﺘﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﺳّﺲ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ "‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻫﻲ " ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠﺔﹲ "‬ ‫ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ "‪ ،‬ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ " ﲤﺜﹼﻼﺕ " ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ )‪.(٢٨‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺒﻪ ﳕﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ َﺗَﺘ َﻤﱠﺜﻞﹸ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺱ‬
‫ﻣﺘﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺘﻔﺎﺿﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﻣﺘﻼﺀ)‪ (٢٩‬ﻭﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺺ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺤﺺ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ " ﻗﻠﺐ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ" ﺃﻭ‬
‫" ﺧﺰﻝ"‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ‬
‫ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎﻩ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﺎﺕ‬
‫ﲏ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﺤﺺ ﺗﻜﻮﻳ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻭﺗﻔﺴﲑ ّ‬
‫ﲡﻌﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻘﹼﻘﻮﺍ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻱ ﻻ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺻﺪﻗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﳋﱪ ّ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻻ ﳐﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﰲ ﺗﻴّﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ُ ،‬ﻭ ِﻋﻴ‪‬ﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺧﺎﺻّﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﲢ ّﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻴّﻦ ﲣﻮﻣﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺼﱠﻨﻒَ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ‬
‫ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺻﻒ ﻭﺃﻥ ُﺗ َ‬
‫ُﻳ ْﻌﻨَﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺟّﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺪﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪62‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺤ ِﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴّﺮﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﻴّﻦ ﺗﻜﻮّﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﻨ ْ‬
‫ﱐ‪.‬‬
‫ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎ ﹼ‬

‫ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻛﺘﺸﻔﻮﺍ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﻮﺍ‬
‫ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺩﻟﹼﻠﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﳌﺎﻗﺒﻠ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻣﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ‪،‬‬
‫ﺃﻱ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻫﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳍﻮّﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺮﻭﻫﻠﺮ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺸّﻬﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻼﺕ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻤﻊ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳊﻘﹼﺔ؛ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺘﺐ‪:‬‬

‫ﻼ‬
‫"ﺇﻧّﻲ ﻷﺟﺰﻡ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟ ّﺪﻗﹼﺔ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻘ ﹰ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ)ﻱ("‬
‫ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ُﻣَﻨ ﱢﻐﺼًﺎ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﺸّﻲﺀ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟ ُﻮ ِﻋ ﱢﻲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ‬
‫ﺕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﺐ‪:‬‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺯ ﻟﻮﺍ ّ‬
‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻋﺎﺋﻖ ﻟﻸﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺎﻋﻠﺔ ﻣﺜﺎﻻ"‬

‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻘﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻮ ﰲ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﻀّﻤﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﺘﻔﻮﻳﺖ ﻟﻠﻮﻗﺖ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻭﻧﻜﻮﺹ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻷﺳﻔﻞ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻁ ﻭﺑﻮﻫﻠﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ُﻣﻌِﻴﻘﹰﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻈﺖ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻭﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﻂ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﻼﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺸّﻲﺀ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻤﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻔﺤﺼﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻗ ﹼ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪63‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﻣﺪّﻬﺗﻤﺎ ﻬﺑﺎ ﲡﺎﺭﻬﺑﻤﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﻈﺮّﻳﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻈﺖ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﺼﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﶈﺾ ﺳﻠﺒﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﻨﺪﳘﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪.‬‬

‫*‬
‫* *‬

‫ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺴﻌﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﻮ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻤﻮﺍ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﲏ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳉﺪّﺓ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻴﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﻴّﻦ ﻛﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ـ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻏﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻣﻜﺴﺒﺎ ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻭﺗﻴﺘﺸﻨﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،.‬ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺑﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻏﺎﻣﻀﺎ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﰲ ﳓﻮ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺑﺘﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﺘﺸﻒ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ)ﺃﺃ(‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﻨﺖ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺣﺮّﺍ ﻭﺧﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺒّﻘﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺑﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺷﺎﻋﺮ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ‬
‫ﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﲟﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﺒﺪّﺕ ﻟﻪ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﻣﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ﹾﺜِﺒ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ "ﺭﺳﻢ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ" ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻓﻠﺲ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺣﲔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻓﺮﻧﻚ‪.‬‬
‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﻏﺪﺕ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳍﺎ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﲞﺎﺻّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﺘﺮﻗﹼﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻻﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﻻ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺇﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻟﻴﻤﻠﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﻩ ﻋﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﺮﺩّﺩ ﺑﲔ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﺿﲔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﺍ ﻟﻪ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﳌﹼﺎ ﻋﻠﹼﻖ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﲝﺜﻪ‪:‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪64‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﺒﺪﻭ ﱄ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻪ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺳﻴﺲ‪ ،" .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻭِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻏﻤﺘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟّﻴﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﺎ ﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺑﺪﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ ﻣﺘﺮﺩّﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺘﻬﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ُﻳ َﻌ ﱡﺪ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺗﺮﺩّﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ )ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻋﺎﻭﺩﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟ ﹼﻈﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﺑﻴﻠﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ( ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺇﺳﻘﺎﻃﺎﻬﺗﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻈ ّﻦ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ "‬
‫ﺼ ﹶﻠﺔﹲ " ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻓﺠّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺤ ﱠ‬
‫ﻣُ َ‬

‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺑﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺪﺭّﺝ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺸﻌﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ‬
‫ﲤﻌّﻦ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻻﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻻ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺎﺭﻕ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﺝ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ)‪ .(٣٠‬ﻟﻴﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻔﺎ‪:‬‬
‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻻﻭﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﳏﺘﺎﺝ ﻟﺼﻮﺭ‬
‫ﻭﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ"‬

‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﻗﺪ ﺛﻘﻠﺖ ﻭﺗﺄﻗﻨﻤﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻌﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻌﻘﹼﻠﺖ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ " ﺇﻧّﻲ ﺫﺍﻫﺐ ﻏﺪﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻘﻞ‬
‫ﱯ‪ .‬ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫"‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﺮﻥ ﰲ ﺫﻫﲏ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ ﳌﺮﺑّﻊ ﻋﺸ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺆﺩّﻱ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﺘﻀﻤﱠﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﳍﺎ‬
‫ﻼ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣُ ﹶﻜ ﱢﻤ ﹰ‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺧﻠﻂ ﺷﻨﻴﻊ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ " ﺇﻧّﻲ ﺫﺍﻫﺐ ﻏﺪﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻘﻞ "‬
‫ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ " ﻏﺪ " ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪65‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻧﺴﻖ ﴰﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺛﻮﺍﺑﺖ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻘﻰ ﺣﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻃﺎﻣّﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺣﻠﹼﺖ ﺑﺄﻫﻠﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﺠﻤﻟﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻋﻴﺶ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻭﻁ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚّ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺿﻤﻨﻴّﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻄﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺟﻴّﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻨﺖ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻌﲎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ " ﺣﻘﻞ " ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻀﺐ؛ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ :‬ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ " ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﺎﺏ " ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ " ﻏﺪﺍ "‪ .‬ﻭﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮﺓٍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻬﺮﻗﺮﻯ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﲤﻠﹼﻜﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺰﻉ‪ِ ،‬ﻟ َﻤ ﹶﻜﺎ ِﻥ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻐﲑﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺬﹼﻛﺮ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲟﻼﺣﻈﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻔﺎﻟﲑﻱ‪ :‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﻬﺎ ﻟﻮ ﲤﺎﺩﻳﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎﻫﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻓﺎﻟﲑﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺿﺎﻑ " ﻭﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺠّﻞ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻓﻬﻢ "‪ ،‬ﳑّﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺄﻧّﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﳓﻦ ﻻ‬
‫ﻧﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨّﻬﺎﻳﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻀﺐ ﻟﻠﺠﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋ ّﻲ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﺪﻯ ﻋﺎﱂ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ؛ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻬﺘ ّﻢ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳚﺪ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺌﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﻻ ﰲ‬
‫ﻻ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﻮﻙ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣُ ْﺒَﺘ ﹶﻜ ٍﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﳝﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‬
‫ﻷﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺠﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺠﻼﺀ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤﻞ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‬
‫ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺪﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺴﺎﺀﻝ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﰲ ﺫﻫﻨﻨﺎ ؟ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ‪ :‬ﳓﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ؟ ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﺑّﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺄﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺑّﻌﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻬﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻢ ﺃﺳﻔﻞ ﺣﺪﻳﻘﱵ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﰐ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺫﻫﺐ ﻟﻠﺠﻠﻮﺱ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺮﺑّﻌﺎ ﳎﻬﻮﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺑّﻌﺎﺕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴّﻬﻞ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺹ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺍﺻﻄﻔﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﺘّﻤﺪّﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ)‪ .(٣١‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﹸﺃ ِﺟ ْﺒﺖُ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺃﻧّﻰ ﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻋﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ؟ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﳐﻔﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺳﻨﺪ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﺳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪66‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﱪﻫﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ؟ ﺃﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺪﻟﻮﻝ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺪﺍ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﰲ ﺷﻜﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻜﺎﻝ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻌ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻌ ﹼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺮﺑّﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺸﱯّ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺮﺳﻢ ﳎﻬﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﺪّﺩ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻷﻭﱃ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﻴﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﲣﻠﹼﺼﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﺴﺒّﻖ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺴﺐ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺘﻠﺔ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺨﻠﹼﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‬
‫ﻕ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺑﻨﺖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺧﻠﻄﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠ ّﻲ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺩﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺃﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺺ ﺍﻵﰐ‬
‫ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﻠﻎ ؛ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺎ ﻟﻠﻨّﺨﺎﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺪﻟﹼﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟّﻨ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ‪:‬‬
‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ) ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ( ﻳﻔﺤﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻧﺴﻤّﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﺤ ّﻖ ﺻﻔﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻷﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ‪ ...‬ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺪﺍ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳍﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻜﻴّﻔ ّﻲ)ﺑﺐ( "‬

‫*‬
‫* *‬

‫ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ١٩١٤‬ﺍﻷﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻭﺻﻔﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﺑﻼ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧّﺮﻳﻦ ﳌﺒﺪﺃ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻻﺳﻴّﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﺒﻄﻨﺔ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻔﲔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﰐ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺟﻬﺪﻭﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻔﻠﺤﻮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻠﹼﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭ ﹼ‬
‫ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻮﻳﻠﺮ‪ .‬ﻭِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮﺓٍ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪67‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻮﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺭ‪.‬ﺏ‪ .‬ﺑﻴّﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﻓﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺇﱃ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻫﻞ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻛﺒﻨﺖ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﹼﺪﻭﺍ ﺃﻧّﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﻮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺑﻼ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻳﻘﻠﹼﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻴﺸﻨﺮ ﻭﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﺄﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﻘﺪّﻣﺎ ﳑّﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﳎﺎﻭﺑﺎ ﻟﻮﻙ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺒَﺘ َﺪﹶﺃ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻈﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻻﻧﺖ‪ .‬ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﺜﻞ ﲡﺎﺭﺏ ﺳﺒﲑ)ﺗﺖ( ﻗﺪ ﺟﻠﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺣﻴﺚ ﱂ ﻧﻜﻦ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺛﻼﺛﲔ ﺳﻨﺔ ﺧﻠﺖ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻟﻚ‬
‫ﺷﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﻏﺮﻭﺑﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﺘﻐﻴّﺮ ِﻟَﻨ ﹶﻈ ِﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﳍﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺃﲝﺎﺙ ﻓﻴﻠﻴﺐ‬
‫)ﺛﺚ( ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴّﻨﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﳐﻄﹼﻄﻴّﺔ ﻣﺘﺰﻳّﺪﺓ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺴّﺮ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺸﻔﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﳏﺪّﺩﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﺏ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺨﻄﹼﻂ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻓﺮﺩﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺑﺮﻛﻠﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺿُ ِﺮ َ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻭﺭﻳﻔﻠﺖ ﺩﻟﹼﻮﻧﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺘﺰ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ ﱂ‬
‫ﻧﻀﺮﺏ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ‪ :‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘ ﹼﻞ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺳﻨﺪ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ َﻭ ﹾﻗﻒٌ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ؛ ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﻣﻴﻜﻴّﺔ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﱄ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺣﻠﹼﺖ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻵ ﹼ‬

‫ﻚ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻣﺎﺯﻟﻨﺎ ﻧﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻔ ّ‬
‫ﺺ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺺ ﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜ ّ‬
‫ﻧﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﺮﺃﻱ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﱂ ﻧﺼﻐﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺃﻭ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗ ﹼﻞ ﱂ ﻧﺼﻐﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﻭﻓﺮّﻱ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺃﳘﹼﻴﺘﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪68‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺑﻴّﻮﺏ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﺭﺑﻮﺍ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﻃﻠﺒﻮﺍ ﺣﺪّﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻄﻠﻮﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻷﻧّﻬﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ‬
‫ﻳﺮﻭﻣﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩﻭﺍ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺷﺮﻑ ﻭﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﱂ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﻝ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺩّﺓ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻠﻘﹼﻰ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﺛﹼﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻚ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﻋﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﳌﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‬
‫ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻔ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺑﺮﺍﻫﲔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﳏﺼّﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻍ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺣﺪّﺩﻧﺎ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻭ ﹰﻻ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ )ﲢﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺐ َﺭﹾﺃﺳًﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﹼﰒ ُﻳﺼَﺎ ﹸ‬
‫ﻳُ ﹾﺬ َﻫ َ‬
‫ﻁ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﻘﺪﻳّﺔ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﻭﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ( ﹼﰒ‬
‫ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺍﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺼ ﹾﻎ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﺰﻭﻡ‬
‫ﻂ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ َﻧ ُ‬
‫ﺃﺟﺮﻳﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧُ ْﻌ ِ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻠﻮ ﺍﺭﺗﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﺪّﻣﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻦ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ‬
‫ﺣﻠﻮﻝ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺎ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺴﻌﻰ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﻴّﻨﻪ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﻧﻂ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺴّﺮ ﺍﻷﺷﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﻷﺩﱏ؛ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺴ ٍﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻠﺒﺖ ﺑﻴُ ْ‬

‫ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﺎ ﻧﻌﺎﻭﺩ‬
‫ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘ ّﻲ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﻌَﺘَﻨﻖِ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺴﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﲟﺜﺎﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺳﻮﻑ ُﻳ ْﻌ ﹶﻄﻴَﺎ ِﻥ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻔﺼﻼﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺪ ﻟﻠﺜﹼﺎﱐ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻄﻠﺐ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺤ ﱠﻠﻞﹸ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻔﻈﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻞ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺘﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻻ ﺗُ َ‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﳓ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻭﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺮﻯ ﳕﻄﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪69‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻞ ﺑﻘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‬
‫ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳋﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻴﻨّﺎﻩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻓﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ)‪ .(٣٢‬ﻭﺍﳌﺸﻜﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺳﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﻴّﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﺘﻴﻨﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﲔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﺼﻬﺮﺍ ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳔﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ؟ ﺇﻧّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻨﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺴﺒّﺒﻬﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻧﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﲨﻴﻌﺎ ﺣﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺸﻞ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺛﻼﺛﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺒﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻧﺒﻌﺎﺙ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻠﺔ)‪(٣٣‬‬
‫ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫) ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺮﻑ ﻋﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﺮّﺏ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ‬

‫)‪ (1‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳝﻠﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ‪ .‬ﻓﺪﺧﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺄﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳُ ﹾﺬ ِﻋ َﻦ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﳛﻜﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎﺗﺼﻒ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺝ ﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺫﺭﻳﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻗﺪ ﹸﻃ ﱢﻮ َﻋ ْ‬
‫ﺼ ٍﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺤ ﱠ‬
‫ﻱ ﻣُ َ‬
‫ﻭﻧﻈﺮ ّ‬

‫ﻱ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻘﹸﻪُ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍ ﹸﳌ َﺆﱠﻟﻒُ‪،‬‬


‫)‪ (2‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻋﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻓﻴﺤﺼّﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ َﺭ َﻭ ِﻭ ﱞ‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍ ﹸﳌ َﺮ ﱢﻛِﺒ ﱢﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﺙ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﻟﻪ‬


‫ﺤ ِﺪ ِ‬
‫)‪ (3‬ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﺛﺮ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻫﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪70‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (4‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺫﺭّﺍﺕ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴّﺎ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﻳﺮ ّﺩ ﺍﳌﺮﻛﹼﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻﻣﺘﻐﻴّﺮﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺳﺒﺒﻴّﺔ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺭﺩّﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻴﻂ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺍﺕ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (5‬ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ َﺗِﺒﲔُ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻲ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣﺴّﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﻻ ﳏﺪّﺩﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﹼﻤﺔ ﻭﳏﺪّﺩﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﺍﻬﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻧﺴﺘﻨﺞ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﹸﺃ ْﺧﺮَﻯ ﻻ ﺗﺒﲔ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻨﻈﹼﻢ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (6‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺍﺕ ﻫﻲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃ ّﻭﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﲣﻄﹼﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻷ ّﻭﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﱄ ﺫﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺄﻣّﻞ ﻧﻘﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻄﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻷ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻓﻠﺴﻔ ّﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ‪.‬‬

‫ﺲ‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫)‪ (7‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳜﺘ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺘﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﺃﻛﱪ‪ ،‬ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (8‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻻﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﻨﻊ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍ ﹸﳌﺤَﺎﻝِ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻣﺎ ﳏﻀﺎ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻻﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩﺓ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺍﻻﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳍﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﶈﺾ‪ .‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ‪ ،‬ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (9‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﻌﺜﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﻻﻳﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻣﻦ ﻟﻮﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻂ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻤﺖ ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪّﻣﺘﻪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﺒﻖ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻔﹼﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪71‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (10‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،Ideen‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (11‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻧﻌﺖ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﳌﺎﻗﺒﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﻟﺮّﺟﻮﻉ ﻭ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺣﺮّﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺴﺒّﻖ‬
‫ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻮﻗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺰﻳﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﻣﺎ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻧﻔﺴﻪ )ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ(‬

‫)‪ (12‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﳏﺼّﻞ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ‬
‫ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (13‬ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ُﻣ ﹾﻘَﺘﻀَﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻪ‬
‫ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪.‬‬
‫)‪ (14‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻛﻠﹼﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻠﹼﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ‬
‫ﳑّﺎ ﺳﻴﻨﻘﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ُﻣَﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠﺔٍ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺜﻼ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ‬
‫ﺾ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﳑّﺎ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺎﺯﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺰﻟﻪ ﻟَﺒ ْﻌ ٍ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (15‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﱂ ﺗﺼﺮ ﻣﺘﻤﺜﹼﻠﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺜﹼﻠﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (16‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻮﺟﺪﺓ ﻟﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ُﻮ ِﻋ ﱢﻲ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (17‬ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﺑُ ْﻌ ِﺪ ﺃﻭﻗﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻳﺘﺤﺪّﺩ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﲤﺜﹼﻠﻴّﺎ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (18‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺗﺸﺨّﺺ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﻣﻌﻴّﻨﺎ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ُﻣﺸَﺎﺭًﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺍﻣﻰ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ُﻣ ﹾﻘَﺘ ِﺮﻧًﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻴّﻨﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪72‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳُﻮ ِﺟُﺒﻪُ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻀﻊ ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‬
‫ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺫﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (19‬ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺴّﺮ‬
‫ﻒ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﺍﳌﹸ ﹶﻔ ﱢﺮ ِﺩ‬
‫ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺘﻤﺜﹼﻠﺔ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﱠﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛ ّ‬
‫ﳍﺎ ؟‬

‫ﻱ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪.‬‬


‫)‪ (20‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘّﻘﺮﻳﺮ ّ‬

‫)‪ (21‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻣﺄﺧﻮﺫﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﳓﻮ ﺃﺧﺬ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ؛ ﻓﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺄﺧﺬ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (22‬ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﺄﺧﻮﺫﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﳘﺎ ﺑﺘﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻠﻲ ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﺯ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ َﻣﻌِﻴﺶٌ ﳏﺾ ‪ Erlebnis‬ﻭﺣﺪﺙ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ‬
‫ﻱ ‪ Corrélatif intentionnel‬ﺃﻭ ﺍ ﹶﳌ ْﻌِﻨ ﱢﻲ ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻖُ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﺜﺎﻝ‪ :‬ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻗﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻬﺎﻧﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻧﺴﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﲟﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺰﺀ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻴﺸﻲ ﳍﺬﻩ‬
‫ﻱ‪) .‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺚ‪،‬‬
‫ﰐ ﻭﻣﺎ ّﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺪﺙ ﳏﺾ ﺫﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﻤﺎﻧﻮﻥ(‬

‫)‪ (23‬ﺇﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺩﺧﻮﻻ ﻣﻮﺟﺒﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﱪ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻻﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺎﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﻥ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﻓﻌﻠﻴّﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭُ ِﻓ َﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﺋﻖ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪73‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺠﺮّﺩﻫﺎ ﻓﻠﻬﺎ ﺭﻏﺒﺔ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﻉ ﻷﻥ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻀﻰ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (24‬ﻭﻣﺎﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﳍﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮّﻏﺒﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ؟! ﺃﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﹶﻗ ْﺒﻞﹸ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﻤﺜﹼﻠﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻛﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺻﲑﻭﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻣَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜ ﹶﻠ ﹰﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﺎ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﺘﻤﺜﹼﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻏﲑ؟!‬

‫)‪ (25‬ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ ﳜﺎﻟﻄﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﹼﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ‪Idéalement‬‬
‫ﻓﺤﺴﺐ‪ ) .‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻦ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ(‬

‫)‪ (26‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺟﻴﻄﻮ‪ ،cogito‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﻧﺎ ﺃﻓﻜﹼﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﺑﻼ ﺗﻮﺳّﻂ‬
‫ﺲ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﻩ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻀّﺎﻣﻦ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺪّﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﳏﺾ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺘﺒﺲ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (27‬ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺟﺰﺋﲔ‪ ،‬ﺟﺰﺀ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺫﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺪّﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ‪ ،‬ﻭﺟﺰﺀ‬
‫ﺛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺘّﺔ ﺃﲝﺎﺙ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (28‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻴّﺰ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﻴﻴﺰ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ ﻟﻠﺮّﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﱐﹼ‪ ،‬ﺑﲔ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ‬
‫ُﻣ ْﺪ َﺭﻛﹰﺎ ﻟﻠﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻭﻗﻌﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻟﺖ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﺴّﺮ ﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﳌﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﰐ )ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﻘﺪّﻣﺎﺕ ﳌﻨﻄﻖ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺑﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺪﺙ ﺫﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮّﺍﺑﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﺳﻊ‪(.‬‬

‫ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ‬ ‫)‪ (29‬ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻭﻳﺔ‪L'intentionalité vide‬‬


‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﺳﻴّﺎ ﳝﻸ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﻑ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪74‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻳﻌﺪّﻫﺎ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺑﺎﶈﺾ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻓﺘﺒﺪﺃ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﲡﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﺳﻴّﺎ‬
‫ﳝﻸﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﶈﺪﻭﺱ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻠﺌﻪ ﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‬
‫ﺗﻘﺘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻫﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﺪ ) ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺩﺱ‪(.‬‬

‫)‪ (30‬ﺃﻱ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (31‬ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻠﻤﻴﺢ ﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﺁﺧﺮ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﺎﺽ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﺑﺴﻄﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺆﻟﹼﻔﻪ‬
‫ﱄ ‪ L'imaginaire.‬ﻭﺧﻼﺻﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﺳﻴﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻠﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﳋﻴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﰲ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺮﻓﺔ ؟‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻪ ِﻟ َﻢ ﱂ ﻧﻜﻦ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻌﺮ ﹼ‬
‫)‪ (32‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﺨﻴّﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻘﹼﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﺘﻨﺸﻄﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺫﺍﺗﲔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (33‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺒﲑﻳﻦ ؛ ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴّﻦ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﺳﻊ ﻋﺸﺮ ﻭﺑﺪﺍﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺸﺮﻳﻦ ﺇﱃ ﺣ ّﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌّﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻔﺖ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼﻬﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﻻ ﲣﺮﺝ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺑﻮﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻋﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ) ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ ﻭﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪.(.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺍﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﺘﻘﻲ ﰲ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺳﻴﺒﻴّﻦ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﰲ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ‪ ،‬ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺼﻌﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻡ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﺘﻌﺮّﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻃﻞ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻭﻳﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﺃ( ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ‪ ، Psychologie du Raisonnement‬ﺑﺎﺭﻳﺲ‪،‬‬


‫‪.١٨٩٦‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪75‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺹ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺓ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻠﺒﻠﺠﻴﻜ ّﻲ ﺃﻫﺮﻧﺲ ‪ Ahrens‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻪ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺏ( ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻟﻘﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﺒﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ .١٨٣٦‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺸﺮ‬
‫ﺑﺮﻭﻛﻨﺲ ﻭ ﺃﻓﺎﻧﺎﺭﻳﻮﺱ‪.‬‬
‫ﺕ( ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ‪ ، De l'Intelligence‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺪّﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪ ١‬ﻭﺹ ‪.٢‬‬
‫ﺙ( ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﳐﺼﻮﺹ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳋﺼﻮﺹ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺝ( ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٩.‬‬
‫ﺡ( ﻏﻠﺘﻮﻥ‪Statics of mental Imagery ( Mind,1880), ،‬‬
‫‪Inquiries to human faculties (1885).‬‬
‫ﺥ( ﺑﻨﺖ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ‪.١٨٩٦ ،‬‬
‫‪Psychologie‬‬ ‫‪et‬‬ ‫ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ‬ ‫ﻭ‬
‫ﺩ( ﻻﺷﻴﻠﻴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‬
‫‪Métaphysique.‬‬
‫‪26 ،‬ﻧﻮﻓﻤﱪ‪.١٨٧٢ .‬‬ ‫‪Rapport‬‬ ‫ﺫ( ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﺑﺘﱯ‪Batbie‬‬
‫ﺭ( ﺃﻧﻈﺮ‪ .‬ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺚ‪ ،٨ ،‬ﺃ‪ " : ٨ ،٤٣٢‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ "‬
‫ﺯ( ﺑﺮﻭﺷﺎﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ‪ ، De l'erreur‬ﺹ‪ .١٥١ .‬ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺱ( ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ‪La Vie consciente et les‬‬
‫‪ ،mouvements‬ﺹ ‪ ١١٣‬ﻭﻣﺎﻳﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺩﺣﻀﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺞ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺧﻠﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ﺵ( ﻭﻗﺪ ﺷﻜﹼﻚ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ ﰲ ﺻﺪﻕ ﲡﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ‪.‬‬
‫ﺹ( ﺃﻧﻈﺮ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻉ‪ ، Imagination créatrice‬ﺹ‪ ،١٧ .‬ﻭﻣﺎﻳﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺽ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٢٠.‬‬
‫ﻁ( ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻋﺮ‪ ، Logique des sentiments‬ﺹ‪.٢٢ .‬‬
‫‪Annales‬‬ ‫‪médico‬‬ ‫‪-‬‬ ‫ﻋﻠﻤﻨﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‬ ‫ــ‬ ‫ﻃّﺒﻴّﺔ‬ ‫ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻴّﺎﺕ‬ ‫ﻅ(‬
‫‪1925. ،psychologique‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪76‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻉ( ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻣﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪15 ، Journal de psychologie‬ﺃﻓﺮﻳﻞ ‪.١٩٢٦‬‬
‫ﱐ ﻟﻠﻬﻠﻮﺳﺔ‪ .‬ﰲ ﳍﺮﻣﻴﺖ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﻡ‪Le sommeil.‬‬
‫ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮ ﹼ‬
‫ﻍ( ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٢٢ .‬‬
‫ﻑ( ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪. ٢٤ .‬‬
‫ﻕ( " ﺗﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ "‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣﻴّﺔ ‪" Le souvenir du présent‬‬
‫‪" in Energie spirituelle..‬‬
‫ﻙ( ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪. ٨٠‬‬
‫ﻝ( ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣﻴّﺔ‪ " ،‬ﺗﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ‪".‬‬
‫ﻡ( ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻓﺮﺩﻧﺎﻩ ﳍﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﲎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﲡﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫َﻣ ْﻦ ِﻣ ْﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﱂ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻥ( ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪. ١٨٠‬‬
‫ﲏ "‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻩ( ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺣﻴّﺔ ‪ " :‬ﺍﳉﻬﺪ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫‪ ،L'image mentale‬ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ‪. ١٩١٤ ،‬‬ ‫ﻭ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻱ ‪) Bruhler, Tatsachen und problem,... etc.‬‬
‫‪Integedanken, 321. Arch.f.ges. psych., 1907,‬‬
‫‪t. IX/‬‬
‫ﱯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ ‪Etude expérimentale de‬‬‫ﺃﺃ( ﲝﺚ ﲡﺮﻳ ّ‬
‫‪1903.‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺒﻨﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ) ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ‬ ‫‪،l'intelligence‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻐﺮ ( ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻹﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ) ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﺮ(‪ .‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺑﺐ( ﺑﻨﺖ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ، L'Ame et le corps‬ﺑﺎﺭﻳﺲ‪ .١٩٠٨ ،‬ﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻗﻀﻰ ﺑﻨﺖ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪.١٩١١‬‬
‫ﺗﺖ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ‪.١٩١٤ ،.‬‬
‫ﺛﺚ( ﻓﻴﻠﻴﺐ‪ ، L'image‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪77‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫‪III‬‬
‫ﰲ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻲ‬
‫ﺃﻭﻣﺄ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ ﰲ ﻣﺼّﻨﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺳﻨﺔ ‪ ،١٩٢٧‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﺪﺭﺓ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ‬
‫ﺖ ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺟ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺻﺎﺭﻭﺍ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻗﺪ ُﺣ ﱠﻠ ْ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻃﻦ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﻀﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻧﺸﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺪ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮّﺳﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻟﺪﻭﻣﺎ ﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻠﻴﻎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻬﻮﻳﻦ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻹﺿﻌﺎﻑ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﻔﻜﻜﻨﺎ َﻧ ُﻌ ﱡﺪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﺠﻮﻫﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺗﻴّﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻨﺎ ﳍﺎ‬
‫ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﲢﻴﺎ ﻭﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﻭﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺷﺮﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻭﻏﺮﻭﺑﺎﺕ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻴﺪ ﺗﻠﻚ " ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺓ " ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﳝﺔ‪ ،‬ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﺍﺻﻠﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺿﻼﻉ ﺍﳊﻴّﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫" ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ﹾﻔ ِﻬ َﻢ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﻘﻠﻴﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ ﻭﺣ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ُﻳﻀَﺎﻫِﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻬﻧﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻀﻤّﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﺳﻄﻞ ﻣﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﺣﺠﺎﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﺑﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﺒﻮﻛﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻋﻴﺘﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﻟﺘﺮﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻣﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺷﺌﺖ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻨﻠﻖ‬
‫ﺑﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻬﺮ‪ :‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺑﺎﻕ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻨﺒﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺎﺀ ﺍﳊ ّﺮ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﻐﻮﺹ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺴﻴﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪) ".‬ﺃ(‬

‫ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻨﺎ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ َﺩ ﹰﺓ ﺗﺴﻤّﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ِﺑِﺈﺯَﺍ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻗﺮﺭﻧﺎ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺨﻠﹼﻞ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻠﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓِﻴﻤَﺎ ﺯﻋﻤﻮﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ُﺑ ﱠﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ﹾﻔ َﻬ َﻢ‪:‬‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ )ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ( ﲟﺪﻟﻮﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻳﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲟﺠﺮّﺩ ﻋﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪78‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭ‪ ...‬ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﺒﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻻ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﳍﺎ)ﺏ( "‬

‫ﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ‪ ..." :‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﺒﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ) ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ( ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺪﻟﻮﻝ)ﺕ( "‬
‫ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ؛ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻛﹼﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬


‫ﻓﻤﺎ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﻗﻂ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ْﺒ ِﻄ ﹶﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺎﻏﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ"ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺰﺋﺔ" ﻭ" ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻛﻴﺐ"‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﺛﺒﺘﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺹ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺁﻟﻴﺎ؛ ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺿﺮﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻞ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺊ ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻓﺸﻴﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻫﻠﹼﻠﻨﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﺘﺐ " ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳍﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺃﺭﺍﺿﻴﺎ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫ﻳﻄﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ) ﺙ( " ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺘ ّ‬
‫ﻭ ﺑﻮﻟﺪﺭﺍﺕ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻓﺎﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎﻩ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺃﺑﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺴﻂ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﺍﺻﻠﻴّﺔ؛ ﻓﻤﺤﻮﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﻴّﻨﺔ؛ ﻭﺃﻛﹼﺪﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺳﺤﺮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﻏﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﳌﹸ ﹶﻜ ﱢﻮَﻧ ِﺔ ﻟﻪ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﹶﺛﻢﱠ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺮﺣﲔ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺸﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ ﻭﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻊ ﺗﺘﻘﺮّﺭ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ‬
‫ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻃﺮﻳﻒ‪:‬‬
‫" ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ‪ ...‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﳍﺎ ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﲏ ﻭﻫﻲ ﹶﺃﻣَﺎ َﺭﺓﹲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ َﺩ ٍﺓ‬
‫ﺑﺪﻝ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﳍﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺫﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﻖ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻋﻼﻣﺎﺕ؛ ﻭﻫﻲ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﻖ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪79‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺘﺎﻣّﺔ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻮﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟ ّﺪﻗﹼﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ ﻭﲡﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﻋﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﻛﹼﺐ‪ :‬ﳜﺘﻠﻂ ﻓﻴﻪ َﻣﻌًﺎ‬
‫ﺼﻢُ ُﻋﺮَﺍ ُﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﺿﻼﻋﺎ‬
‫ﹸﻼ ﻻ َﺗ ْﻨ ﹶﻔ ِ‬
‫ﲏ ﻟﻴﻜﻮّﻧﻮﺍ ﻛ ًّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﺪﻟﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳊﺴّﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧُ ﹾﻔ ِﺮﺩُ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ‬
‫ﻭﺳﻄﻮﺣﺎ ﻭﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻤﻮﻉ ﺣﺘّﻰ َﻧ ﹾﻔ َﻬ َﻤﻬَﺎ)ﺝ(‪ ...‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻳُ ْﻤ ِﻜﻦُ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮّﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺮﺑّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ َﻳ ِﺪﺏﱡ‪ ،‬ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﻓﻌﺎ ﻟﺘﻄﻮّﺭﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺴ ﱢﺪﺩُ ﻭﻳﻘﻮﺩ ﺃﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻃﺎ ﻏﲑ ﳏﺼّﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﻨﻊ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻌﻄﹼﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻃﺎ‪ :‬ﻧﺸﺎﻃﺎ ﳏﺼّﻼ ﻓﻴُ َ‬
‫ﺳﻴﺎﺝ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀ ﹼﻞ ﺳﺒﻴﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﻋﺎﺋﻖ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺠﺪُ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻹﳒﺎﺩ؛ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺤﻴﻨﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻴّﻨﺔ ﻭﻣﻄﹼﺎﻃﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺘﺤﺮّﻛﺔ‪ ،‬ﺗُ ْﻨ ِ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻴّﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺒﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻄﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺗﻀﻠﹼﻪ)ﺡ("‬

‫ﻭﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺪ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻔﲔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺃﺭﺗﻀﻮﻩ ﻻ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺤﺺ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﺳﻜﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ " ﻃﻤﺴﻨﺎ "‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ ﱂ " ﻧﻔﻜﹼﻬﺎ "‪ .‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﳊﺬﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻳﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﺭّﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺘّﺼﻞ ﻋﺪﱘ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ‪ ،‬ﺗﺬﻭﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺗﺪّﺛﺮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﻟﻠﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻘﺎﺑﻼﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻀﺎﺩﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴﻴّﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻓﻴﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴﲔ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﲔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ)‪ .(١‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻟﻔﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ "ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ" ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﹸ ِﻌ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﻐﺸﺎﻭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺒﺎﺏ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻃﻠﻘﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪﻭَﺍ ِﻣﱠﻴﺔﹸ‪ .‬ﻓﻔﻴﻤﺎ ُﺯ ِﻋﻢَ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‬
‫ﻳﺪﻭﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺗﺪﻭﻡ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳍﻮ ﺃﺳﺎﺱ ﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﳑﻜﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻀﲑ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻼ ﺑﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺪﻭﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻣﺖ ﻣَُﺘ ﹶﻔﱢﻴﹶﺌ ﹰﺔ ﻇﹸ ﹶﻠ ْﻴ ﹰ‬
‫ﲢﺘﻔﻆ ﺑﺎﻹﲰﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﺪﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﻟﻮﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪80‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﺩﱏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﻠﺴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺎﳌﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﻟﻼ ﻳﺒﺘﱰﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻠﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺷﺘّﻰ‬
‫ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴّﻤﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﺎ ّﻡ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺗﺆﻟﹼﻒ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺃﻛﹼﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺗﻌﻘﹼﻠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﺘّﻰ‬
‫ﻳﺴﻮﻍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺳّﺴﻨﺎ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﺎ ﺟﺪﻟﻴّﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﲑﻭﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺤ َﺪﹶﺛ ِﺔ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﻣّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ" ﺛﺎﺑﺘﺔ ﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ"‬
‫ﺍﻻﻓﻼﻃﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﻟﺘﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻀﺎ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻳﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻧﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﺗﻌﺪﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻘﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﲢﺖ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺫﻱ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﱂ‬
‫ﺣّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺪ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺰﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﺘﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ﹾﻔ َﻬ َﻢ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻀﻊ‬
‫ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺻّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻳُ ْﺮ ِﺟﻊُ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ َﺭ ْﻣﺰًﺍ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺎ ـ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟ َﻌ ﹶﻠ ِﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ‬
‫ﺁﺧﺮ )ﻟﻮﺡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﻤﺎﺵ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ( ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺍﻩ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻀ ﹶﻄﺮ‪‬ﺍ ﻓﻬﻤﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻧﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻔﻤﺎ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ َﺳَﻨ ًﺪﺍ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺎ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﳏﺾ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘ ّﻲ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻻ ُﻳ ِﻘ ﱡﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻟﻠﺤﻜﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺛﺮ)‪ .(٣‬ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﺎﻟ ﹼﻄﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳚﻌﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ‪ :‬ﻭ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺴِﺒ ُﺮﻫَﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﻳﻨﻔﺬ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻔﻜﹼﻜﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻌﻴﺪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺮّﻕ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ َﻳ ْ‬
‫ﻧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺳﻨﲔ ﻟﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻔﺘﻘﺮﻬﺗﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻬﻲ ﻟﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﻛﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻜﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ _ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹾﻥ‬
‫ﺴﻨَﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﻧ ِﻘ ﱡﺮ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﱂ ﺗﺰﻝ‬
‫ُﺗَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻘﻞﹶ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﹶﺃ َﻭﹶﻟ ْ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪81‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺇﻬﺑﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ‬
‫َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻏﲑ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻌﻘﹼﻠﻪ‪ .‬ﻭ َﻣﻜﹶﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺃﻥ ُﻧﺬِﻳ َ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ َﺣ ِﺮﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻔﺤّﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺭﺍﺀ ُﻣﻮَﺍ َﺟ َﻬ ﹰﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ُﺗ ﹾﻔﻀِﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺑّﻴﻨّﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺸﺘﺮﻛﺔ ﻟِﺸﺘّﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﳑﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻧﺴﻌﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﱪﻫﻨﺔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴّﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻨّﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺼﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﺗ ﹾﻔﻀِﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ)‪.(٤‬‬

‫‪ (١‬ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ " ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ "‬

‫ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﳌﻤﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ :‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﻌﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﳋﺎ ّﻡ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳝﺪّﻧﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭ‬
‫ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ؛ ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻄﺎﻋﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺮّﻕ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﹶﺛﻢﱠ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻤﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﱪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﹸﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺿ َﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﲔ ﺗﻴﻨﻚ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴّﺘﲔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺣَﺎ ِ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﺎ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳓﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ‪ :‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺄﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻤّﺎﺓ " ﺻﻮﺭﺓ " ﺗُﻌﻄﻰ ﻟﻠ ﱠﺮ ﱢﻭﱠﻳ ِﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﻤّﺎﺓ "‬
‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ" ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻟﻠ ّﺮ ّﻭﻳّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﻨّﺎ ﳓﺼﺮ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻬﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺖ‬
‫ﻭﻻ ﻧﺴﺘﺠﻠﺐ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ .‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﺩّﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺁﺟﻼ ﺃﻡ ﻋﺎﺟﻼ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻴّﻦ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﺒﻪ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ)‪٥‬‬
‫(‪ ،‬ﻏﲑ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺟ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﺼّﻨﻔﲔ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻭﺍ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﺎﺀﻟﻮﺍ ﺇﻥ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻜﻮّﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗُﻌﻄﻰ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻭﺍ‬
‫ﺼ ﹸﻠﻬَﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﻋﻲ‬
‫ﺤ ﱢ‬
‫ﻟﻸﻣﺮ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻋﻔﻮﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﻠﺒﻮﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﺿﻤﲏّ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺍﺏ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪82‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ‪ .‬ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ " ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺔ‪ ".‬ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﱂ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﲔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﺍ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺸﺄﻬﻧﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻼﹼﰐ ﳍ ّﻦ ُﻣﺘَﻌ ﱠﻠﻖٌ ﺧﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﻳﻮﺻﻔﻦ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﺏ" ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ " ؛ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮﻫ ّﻦ ﻓﻴﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻬ ّﻦ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﻟﻨﺘﻤﻌّﻦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‬
‫ﲏ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﺤﺮﻳّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪﻏﻴّﺮﻧﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺃﺣﻠﻠﻨﺎ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻔﺎ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﳍﺎ)‪ .(٦‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﺖ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻳُ ْﻤ ِﻜﻨُﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﺴﺘﻮﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻊ ُﻣﻜﹶﺎ ِﻓ ٍﺊ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ ﳍﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺐ "ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﰒﹼ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺻﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺃﻥ ُﻧﺼِﻴ َ‬
‫ﻱ ﻓﺮﻕ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻴﺎﺱ‬
‫)ﺥ(" ﻣﻦ ِﻗَﺒ ِﻞ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻻ ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺣﻠﻮﻝ ﳑﻜﻨﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺣ ﹼﻞ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﳘﺎ ﺫﻭﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻗﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ‪ .‬ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ " ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﻳّﺔ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﻱ ِﺑﻨَﺎ ﺃﻥ ُﻧ ِﻘ ﱠﺮ ﳍﻴﻮﻡ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻲ " ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ "‪ .‬ﻭ َﺣ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻬﻧﺎ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻭِﻟﱠﻴﺔﹲ)‪ :(٧‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺳّﻞ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﻌﻼﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﲢﺼﻞ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﺼﻮﻻ ﺁﻟﻴّﺎ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ُﺗ ﹾﻠﻘِﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻀّﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺃﺩﱏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺧﺼﻮﺑﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﹼﻖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻓﺤﺺ ﳍﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﲣﺘ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺩﻗﹼﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻔﻴّﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺒﺎﻟﻎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺟﺪّﺍ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﺄﻥ‪:‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪83‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺃﻋﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺁﺫﺍﻧﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﻓﻮﺍﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ َﺗ ْﻌﺘُﻮ ُﺭﻫَﺎ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻣﻠﺘﺒﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻧﻠﺘﻒ‬
‫ﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺟﺪّﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻣّﺎ ﻷﻧّﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻧﺎﺀ ﺟﺪّﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ُﻭ ِﺟ َﺪ ْ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﺑﺴﻠﻮﻛﻨﺎ )ﺩ("‬

‫ﺃﻓﻨﺠﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺻﻮﺭﺍ ؟ ﹼﰒ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻭﺩ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺢ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻌﺪّﻯ ﺣ ّﺪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻟﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪،‬‬
‫ﺃﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺳﻮﻑ ﳔﻠﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ)‪ (٨‬ﻭِﻟ َﻢ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻃﻠﻘﺔ ﻣﺪﻓﻊ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻗﺮﻗﻌﺔ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ ؟ ﻭِﻟ َﻢ ﳓﻦ ﻻ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺻﻮﺭﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ؟ ﻓﺮﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﳎﻴﺐ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﺃﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺁﺧﺬ ﺟﺬﻉ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ )ﺫ(‪.‬‬

‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻂ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ)‪ .(٩‬ﻓﻠﺴﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﻣﺜﺎﻻ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﺠﺄﺓ ﰲ ﻭﻋﻴﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻓﺘُ ﹾﺄ َﺧﺬﹸ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲّ‪ُ ،‬ﻣ ْﺪ َﺭﻙٌ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ـ ﻭﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﻃﺮﻳﻘ ﹰﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻓﺮﺯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﻜﺮّﺭﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﻄﺎﺀ؛ ﺑﻞ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺘﻜﻮّﻥ‬
‫ﺃﻭﻗﺎﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻭﺏ ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻋﻮﺍﱂ ﻣﺘﻮﺳّﻄﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺘﻜﻮّﻧﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﻭﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻘﻈﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺲ َﺣ ﱠﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﻣﺮ ّﺩ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺳﺒﲑ " ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ ﺍﳌﹸ َﺆ ﱠﺳ َ‬
‫ﺷﺪّﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﻨﻄﺎﺳﻴﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﻟﺒﺘﻴﻜﺎ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﻷﻫﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺍﻕ)ﺭ(‪".‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪84‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎ ﻛﻴﻔﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﺒﺜﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻜ ّﻢ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺟﻴّﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ‪:‬‬
‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ " ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ )ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ( ﻫﻲ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﻭﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﳓﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳓﺎﺀ ﻧﻈﺮﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﺎﻫﺎ ﺗﺘﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ)ﺯ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛﻢﱠ‪ ،‬ﻳﺘﻮﺟّﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﺮﺏ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ َﺩ ٍﺓ‬
‫ﱄ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ‬
‫ﻭﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ ٍﺩ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺗﻌﺮّﻑ ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﲏ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ‪.‬‬
‫ﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﻣﺎ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﻟﻠﺤ ّ‬

‫ﺼ ﹶﻠﺔﹲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺳﻠﺒﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺤ ﱠ‬
‫"ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳊﻈﺘﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ‪ :‬ﳊﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ُﻣ َ‬
‫ﺿ َﻊ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺤﻈﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ .‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ ﺟﺪّﺍ ﻭﻛﺜﻴﻔﺔ ﺟﺪّﺍ‪،‬‬
‫ﺗُ ﹶﻘﱢﻴﺪُ ﺟﺰﺀﺍ ﳑّﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭُ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺘﺎﺯﺕ ﻫﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺤﻈﺘﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﻭﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺤﻈﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑُ ْﻌ ٍﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻨّﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺼﻮﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺮﺋﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﴰﹼﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻃﻌﻤﻲ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺃﱂ ﺃﻭ ﻟﺬﹼﺓ ﰲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﺴﺎﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻷﻧﻒ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﻨّﺎ) ﺱ(‪".‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ َﺗ ﹾﺜِﺒﺖُ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﻓﻌﻨﺎ ﺩﻓﻌﺎ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺆﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻟﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻨﻌﺘﱪ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻭﻣﺄﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‪ :‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﺻﻔﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺔ‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺋﻪ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹰﻰ ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﺗﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺃﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣُﻌﻄﻰ ﱄ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻧﺼﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ "ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺣﺼﻮﻻ ﺁﻟﻴﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪85‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺑﺴﻴﻂ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺫﻭ ﺍﺛﻨﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻣﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻌﺘﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺗﻌﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻻ‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳊﻈﺘﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ‪ :‬ﳊﻈﺔ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺗﺒﺪﻭ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺫﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻋﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺿﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﳊﻈﺔ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﲦﺮﺓ ﺧﺼﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻣﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺎﻭﻣﻪ ﻭﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻭﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺜﲑﻩ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺐ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻮﺝ)ﺵ(‪".‬‬

‫ﱄ‬
‫ﺲ ﺍﻷ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﻭﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﲏ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻈﻔﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﺼﻼ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺼّﺮﺍﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺪّﺍﺭﻭﻳ ّ‬
‫ﻱ "‪ .‬ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻭﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻔﺮ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺭﺟﻊ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ " ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ)‪ (١٠‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ْﻌ َﺮ َ‬
‫ﻱ "‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﱂ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﲢﺪﺙ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ "ﺃﺛﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻗﻮّﺓ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﺳﻨﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ‪ .‬ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻫﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺃﻡ ﻧﻔﺴ ّﻲ ؟ ﻭﺃﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺞ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺮﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﺘﺎﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺠ ﹶﻠ َ‬
‫ﲢﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ؟ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ َﺗ ﹶﻠ ْ‬
‫ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻛﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻧﺪ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴَﻨ ﹲﺔ‪:‬‬
‫"ﻓﺤﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﲢﺘﻀﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ‬
‫ﺨ ِﺮ ُﺟﻬَﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮّﺩ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﺘﺪﻓﻌﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ‬
‫ﺭﻛﺒﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺘﺘﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻣﻌﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺘﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻭُﺗ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﻭﺗﻌﻮﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺒﻌﻴّﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﻬﻮﺩﺓ)ﺹ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﻃﻮﺭﺍ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﻛﻮﺭﺗﻜﻴّﺔ ‪ Cortical‬ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﳊﺒﺴﻴّﺔ‪:‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪86‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﳌﹼﺎ ﻣﻬﻠﻮﺱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺣﺘﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺛﻼﺙ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻏﺎﺋﺒﺔ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﻥ ﺗﺘﺨ ﹼﻠﻠﹼﻪ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺧﻀﺮﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﺃﻣﺎﻣﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﺎﺋﻂ ﻣﻐﻠﹼﻒ ﻭﺭﻗﺎ ﺭﻣﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻐﻄﹼﻲ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﺘﺠﻌﻠﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺮﺋﻲّ؛ ﻓﺎﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺭﻕ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺒﻌﺜﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻨﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﻔﺮ؛ ﻣﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﺒﻜﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﻳّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺗُ َﺮ ْﺟ ِﺮﺟُﻬَﺎ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﺷﻌّﺔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﳋﻀﺮﺍﺀ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َﻐ ﱢﻠَﺒﺔﹸ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲤﺤﻮ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻧﺪﺓ ﳍﺎ)ﺽ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﺒﺴﻴّﺔ ﻛﻮﺭﺗﻜﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ‬
‫ﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻌﻄﹼﻠﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭِﻟ َﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﺪ ﺩُ ِﻓ َﻊ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺗُﺮﻯ ِﻟ َﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺧﻀﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺮّﻣﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺎﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳝﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺑﻴّﻨﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﹼﰒ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺄﻝ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ " ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﺤﻴﺢ " ﻭﻫﺬﺍ " ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮﻳﺐ " ؟ ﻟﻘﺪ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩ‪ ،‬ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺫﺍ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ .‬ﻭﺗﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻗﻴﻞ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﱯ ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻻﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﺼﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻴّﺖ " ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺜﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳌﻜﺘ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻪ "‪ .‬ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﺮﺳّﺎﻡ ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ " ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮ ﻣﺜﺎﻻﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺫﻫﻨﻪ " ﹼﰒ " ﻳﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﻛﺮﺳ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺤّﺺ‪ ،‬ﻣﻄﺄﻃﺄ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺭﲰﺎ‬
‫"‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺼّﺪﻳﻖ ﻟﺪﺍﺭﻭﻳﻦ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻳﻮﻡ " ﻳﺘﻔﺤّﺺ ﻗﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻓﺔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺻﻐﲑﺍ ﻟﻠﻌﺬﺭﺍﺀ ﻭﺍﺑﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﻮﻉ‪...‬ﻓﻤﺎ ﻟﺒﺚ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﹶﻃ َﺮ ٍ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﲢﻤﻞ ﺍﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺫﺭﺍﻋﻴﻬﺎ"‬

‫ﻱ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﻨﻪ‬


‫ﻭﺑﻌﺪﺋﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﺴﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ﹾﻘَﺒ ﹶﻞ ﺑﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻔﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺘﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻭ ﻟﻠﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﺑﺴﻮﺍﺀ؛ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪87‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﺯ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻻﺗّﺼﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺾ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﳜﺴﺮ ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳌﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﻫّﻢ ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﻃﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﻳﺸﻐﻼﻥ‬
‫ﺣﻴّﺰﺍ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ " ﻋﺸﺮ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﻣﻨّﻲ"‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺎﻭﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ ﳑّﺎ ﺳﻴﺒﻄﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻪ‬
‫ﻭﻓﻜﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺒﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳜﻠﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺖ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪،‬‬
‫ﻚ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻫﻮﻫﻮ ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻟَﺘﻌَﺎﻧُ ِﺪﱠﻳ ٍﺔ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻘﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﹶﺛَﺒَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸ ّ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻘﻠﺐ ﺫﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻘﺺ ﺗﺎﻥ ‪ :‬ﻓﺘﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲤﻨﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻳﻠﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ‬
‫ﺍﳌﹸ ﹶﻔ ﱢﺮ ِﺯ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﺡ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﺘﻜﺮ ُﻣﻜﹶﺎ ِﻓﺌﹰﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺎ‬
‫ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳُ ﱢﺪ َﺩ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻌﺎﻩ ﺫﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ "ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﻗﺾ)ﻁ( " ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺘﻌﲑ ﺳﺮّﺍ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻭﺣﻜﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ ﳑّﺎ ﳚﻮﺯ ﳍﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﺾ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺳﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﰲ ﺣ ّﻖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ‪ :‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ ﻭﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺄﺑﻴﺾ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﳚﺘﻤﻌﺎﻥ ﰲ‬
‫ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺗﻮﳘﹼﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺮﺑّﻊ ﻗﻤﺎﺷ ّﻲ ﺃﺑﻴﺾ " ﻋﻠﻰﻋﺸﺮ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ "‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻓﺔ ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻣﺮّﺑﻊ ﻗﻤﺎﺷ ّﻲ ﺃﺳﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﻄﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺃﺭﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺮﺑّﻊ ﻗﻤﺎﺷ ّﻲ ﺭﻣﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻓﻴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﻥ‪ .‬ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻜﻲ ﻳﺼ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻤﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ)‪.(١١‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪88‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺐ ﺃﻧﻨّﻲ ﺃﻗﺒﻊ ﰲ ﻏﺮﻓﱵ ﺟﺎﻟﺴﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺰﻳﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎ‪َ .‬ﻫ ْ‬
‫ﻃﺎﻭﻟﱵ‪ .‬ﻓﺘﺮﺩﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺴﻤﻌﻲ ﺃﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﺛﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﺩﻣﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻫﺐ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﲏ ﺁﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺬﻛ ّﺮ َﺑﱢﻴ َﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻛﹼﺮﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﲰﻌﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻣﺲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‬
‫ﺑﺘﻘﻄﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﻭﻧﱪﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﻃﻨﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﹶﺄﱠﻧﻰﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﻔﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻭﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ "‬
‫ﺸ َﻲ ﺿﺠﻴﺞ‬
‫ﲣﺰﻝ " " ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩﺓ " ﻟﻠﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗُ ﹾﻔ ِﻠﺢُ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ َﻐ ﱢ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺻﻮﺍﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﻓﺘﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﺼﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﺭﻉ ؟ ﺃﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﺎﻩ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﲤﻴّﺰ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺧﺰﻟﻪ ﻭﻣﺎﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻪ ؟ ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗﻌﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ‬
‫ُﺣ ﹾﻜﻤًﺎ ؟ ﻭﺇﻻﹼ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻘﻴّﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﺼﺮﺍﻣﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﹼﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ ﲰﻌﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺎﺋﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻟﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳍﻠﻮﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻣﺘﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ‪.‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻤﺖ ﻏﺮﻓﱵ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﳊﻘﻞ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺈﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﺻ ْﺒﻨَﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻤﻢ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻧﺼﲑ ﳎﻨﻮﻧﲔ‬
‫ﻳﻘﺪﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳋﺎﺯﻝ‪ .‬ﻓﻮﺍﻋﺠﱯ ﺃﻛﻨّﺎ ﻟﻮﹸﺃ ِ‬
‫ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺍﳉﻨﻮﻥ ؟‬
‫ﱄ ﳏﺾ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﺦ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻪ ﰲ ﺧﺰﻝ ﺁ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺳّﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ُ ،‬ﻣ ْﺒَﺘ َﺪﺃﹲ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ‪ ،‬ﺗﻌﺘﻤﺪ‬
‫ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺗﺎﻥ‪:‬‬

‫ﻒ ﻫﻲ‬
‫"ﻓﻔﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺛﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺃﺧ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺘﻬﺎ ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﻜﻔﻲ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻋﺎﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺘﺮﻧﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﻠﺤﻘﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻘﻬﻘﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺗُ ﹾﻘ َﺮﻥﹸ ﻬﺑﺎ؛ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻂ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ...‬ﻭﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻋﺎﻣّﺔ ﺍْﻧﺘُ ِﺰ َﻋ ْ‬
‫ﺻ ﹸﻔﻬَﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧ ﹼ‬
‫ُﻳ َﺮ ﱢ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻌﺘﺪﻟﺔ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺑﻌﺾ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺫﺍ ﻣﺘﺎﻧﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﻔﻴﺾ ﺑﻘﻮّﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻩ)ﻅ(‪".‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪89‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻚ ِﻟﻤَﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﺰﻋﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺻﻔﺤﺘﲔ)ﻉ(‪ ،‬ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ‪:‬‬

‫" ﺇﺫﺍ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺒﺖ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺔ ﻓﺄﺑﻄﻠﺖ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺧﺎﺯﳍﺎ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺹّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ؛‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴّﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻬﻧﻠﻮﺱ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻟﺘﻈ ﹼﻞ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ؛ ﻭﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺘﺄ ﺗﻜﻮّﻥ ﻣﻌﺎ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺹ ﻬﺑﺎ"‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﺎﺯﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﳋﺎﺯﻝ ﺍﳋﺎ ّ‬

‫ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺰﻻﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﺘﺎﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﺎ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻟﻴﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻤﻘﺎ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﻛﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ُﻳ ْﻌَﺘ ﱡﺪ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟّﺘ ّ‬
‫ﲏ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺒﲔ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻳﻦ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‬
‫ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﺿﻤ ّ‬
‫ﰐ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻧﺸﺮﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ‬
‫ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺗﺒّﻴﻨّﺎ ﻧﻘﺎﺋﺼﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﻖ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻋﺎ ّﻡ ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﻟﲑﺿﻴﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﻡ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﳘﺎ ﻳﺘّﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻋﺪﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺠﺰﻡ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﻻ ﲤﺘﺎﺯ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮّﺓ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ُﺣ ﹾﻜ ِﻤ ﱟﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﲏ ﻋﺎﳌﲔ‬
‫ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﻞ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﺘﻤﻞ‬
‫ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺫﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ)‪(١٢‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ُﺗﺮَﻯ ﺳﻮﻑ ُﻳ ﹾﻘﻀَﻰ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ ؟ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﲡﺪّﺩ ﻭﺗﺴﻠﺴﻞ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﻌَﺘَﺒﺮِ‪ ،‬ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻭ ﻻﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻮﺍﱂ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺪ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪90‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﺳّﺴﻨﺎﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻻﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣ ﹼﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻪ ﻭﺗﺄﺳﻴﺴﻨﺎ ﺇﻳّﺎﻩ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻢ ﻭﺩﺭﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ .‬ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ‬
‫ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ‪:‬‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻧﺴﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‬
‫" ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﳓﻜﻢ ﺑﺘﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﻊ ﻧﺴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ) ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﲡﺎﺭﺏ ﻃﻮﻳﻠﺔ ﻭ ﻣﺘّﺼﻠﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﹼﻤﺘﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﺮّﻗﻪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ(‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺎﻳﺲ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﳓﻜﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ...‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺼﻨّﻒ ﺇﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻨﻀﻌﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ)ﻍ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ‪ :‬ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻄﻮّﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺪ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ‬
‫ﺕ‪ .‬ﺍﳌﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺢ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ‬
‫ﻼ ِ‬
‫ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺧﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﳓﻦ ﰲ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﺘ َﻤﱡﺜ ﹶ‬
‫ﺍﺗّﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﲣﻠﹼﺼﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺫﺟﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﹶﺃﻣَﺎ َﺭ ﹶﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻠﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﻳﺰﻝ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲤﺜﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺇﺩﻣﺎﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺯﻣﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻡ ﻻ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ " ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ " ﻗﺪ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ " ﺻﻮﺭﺓ " ﻭﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ " ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ "‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺻﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺘﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﻧﺴﻖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﳏﺎﻳﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻮﺟﻮﺩ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ‬
‫ﺼَﻨﻊُ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻌﺘﻮﺭﻩ ﺗﺸﺬﻳﺐ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻠﲔ ﻭﻳﺰﺩﺍﺩ ﻏﲎ؛ ﻓﺠﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ُﺗ ﹶﻈ ﱡﻦ ﻟﻮﻗﺖ‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ُﻳ ْ‬
‫ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺔ ﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻵﻥ ُﺗ ْﻬ َﻤﻞﹸ؛ ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻣﻜﺜﺖ ﻟﻮﻗﺖ‬
‫ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺎﻫﻲ ﺗُ ْﺪ َﻣﺞُ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﺴﻖ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﲤﻴﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻂ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻧﺄﻳﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﳑّﺎ ﳓﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗ ﹼ‬
‫ﱄ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺎﺅﻭﻥ ﺍﻵﻥ ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪91‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺻﺎﺭ ﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮ ٍﺓ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺘﺴﺒﲔ ﻟﻨﺴﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻳﺼﲑ‬
‫ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻡ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﺇّﻧﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺘﺼﺮ‬
‫ﺤ ﹶﻜ َﻤ ِﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻨﻊ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺧﻄﲑ‪ :‬ﺃﻻ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺎﺕ ﻣُ ْ‬
‫ﻼ )‪ (١٣‬ﻟﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻗﺪ ﲢﺪّﺙ‬
‫ﺤَﺘ َﻤ ﹰ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻳﻘ ّﻲ ﻻﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣُ ْ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻋﻦ " ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﶈﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ "‪ .‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ ﻻ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺻﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺤﺺ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻻﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ؛ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻧﺴﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻳﺘﻐﻴّﺮ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﻭﺿﻌ ّﻲ ﻣﻠﺤﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﻖ ﺩﻳﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻘﺎﺋﺪ ﻭﻳﺆﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺠﺰﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻟﻪ ﻧﺴﻖ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻟﻠﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ‪ .‬ﻧﺼﻞ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺸﻒُ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺒﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗُ ﹾﻜ َ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﻳﻘﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟّﺒﺘّﺔ ﺫﻭﻭﻱ ﻳﻘﲔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮ‬
‫ﱄ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﲝ ّﻖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺟﺮّﺩﻧﺎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻪ‬
‫ﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻘﻒ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﺎ ﻓﺮﺿّﻴﺎ ﲡﺮﺑﻴّﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻋﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺍﺗّﺨﺎﺫﻩ ﺇﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺃﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻨﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﻻ ﳜﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﲔ ﺑﺎﺻﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻼ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺳّﻞ ﻧﺴﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺎ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻟّﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺨﱪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻨّﺎ ﲡﺮﺑﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻛﺘﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﺭﻯ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺗﻜﺘﻨﻔﲏ؛ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺗﻮﻫّﻢ‬
‫ﻟﱪﻫﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ‪ :‬ﻓﻼ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‬
‫ﲟﺎﻧﻌﱵ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﲏ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﺎ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻟﻴﺪﻟﹼﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤّﺔ ﺭﺃﻳﻪ)ﻑ( ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﳌﻘﻨﻊ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ‬
‫ﲔ ﺧﻔﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﲰﻌﻪ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻳﻮﻡ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻬ ّﻢ ﺑﺎﳋﺮﻭﺝ‪:‬‬
‫ﺸِﻨ ٍ‬
‫ﺑَ‬

‫»ﻓﺘﺴﺎﺀﻟﺖ ﺃﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﻄﺮ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻳﻬﻄﻞ ؟ ﻓﺤﺪّﺩﺕ ﲰﻌﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺮّﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺪﻳﺪ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳒﻠﻰ ﱄ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺕ ﰲ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﻭﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺃﻣﺎﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺗﺴﺎﺀﻟﺖ ﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺎﻑ ؟‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪92‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﱐ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺮ‪ .‬ﺫﻫﺒﺖ ﻓﻔﺘﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻓﺬﺓ‪ :‬ﻓﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ‬
‫ﻼ‪ .‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻷﺫ ﹼ‬
‫ﻛﹼ‬
‫ﻗﻄﺮﺓ ﻣﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺒّﻠﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﺃﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻄﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﱰﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻣﺔ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺑﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳓﻨﻴﺖ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ ...‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ)ﻕ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻂ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﻌﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻓﺮﺯﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ؟‬


‫ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻛﻢ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻗ ﹼ‬
‫ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸّﻨﲔ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﲞﺎﻃﺮﻱ ﻟﺘﺒﻴّﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺃﺗﻔﺤّﺺ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﹼﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻓﺬﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺱ‬
‫ﺳﺒﲑ ﱂ ﺗﻜﻦ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻏﺮﺿﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻄﺄ ﺷﻨﻴﻊ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺪ ّ‬
‫ﰲ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗﻌﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻗﺪ ﺃﳒﺰﻧﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺴّﻠﺴﻠﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ) ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺍﺳﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺳﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻔﺤﺘﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ (‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﲤﻴﻴﺰ‬
‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻣﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)‪ .(١٤‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﻓﺤﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻻ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﺪﻕ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﻣﻨﺪﻭﺣﺔ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﻤّﻲ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﺑﺎﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﺿﻰ ﺑﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﹶﺄ ﹾﻥ ﻧُ ْﺪ ِﺭ َﻙ‬
‫ﺸﹶﺄ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻘﻂ ﹶﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻧُ ْﺪ ِﺭ َﻙ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ َﺳﱢﻴﺌﹰﺎ‬
‫ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﹶﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻧُ ْﻨ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻻ ﻧﻐﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﺑﺼﻮﺍﺏ‪ :‬ﻓﺒﺤ ّﻖ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺸﺮ ﺧﻄﻮﺍﺕ ﻣﻨّﻲ ﻣﻨﻐﻤﺴﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻈ ﹼﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﲝ ّﻖ ﺟﺴﻢ ﳓﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﺭﻉ‪،‬‬
‫ﻃﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﺘﺮ ﻭﲦﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﻢ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺧﻄﺄﻧﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﳓﻮ ﹶﺃ ْﺧ ِﺬﻧَﺎ ﳌﻌﲎ ﺫﺍﻙ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻟﻘﻲ ﺑﺄﺫﱐ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﺴﻤﻌﻲ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﲝ ّﻖ ﺻﻮﺕ ﻗﺮﻗﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻟﺘﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻴّﻦ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﲰﻌﺘﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺮﻗﻌﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ .‬ﻓﺮﺑّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ)ﻙ(‪ ،‬ﺃﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﺕ ﺻﻮﺗﺎ ﻋﻀﻮﻳّﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺕ َﻧ ﹶﻔﺴِﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺻﻮﺕ ﺷﻨﲔ ﺍﳌﻄﺮ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪93‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻫﺐ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻗﺒﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺠﻤﻟﺎﺩﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬﻩ ﺳﺒﲑ)‪ (١٥‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻛﻴﻒ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻀﻊ ﲤﺜﹼﻼ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺘﻬﺎ ؟ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺸﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻘﻂ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪:‬‬

‫"ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ؛ ﻭﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻬﻧﻠﻮﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻐﺎﺩﺭ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ"‬

‫ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﻓﺮﺿﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ ‪ :‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺑﺼﺮﺕ‬
‫ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺴﺎ ﻗﺪّﺍﻣﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﺴﻰ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻨﻌﲏ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺮﺅﻳﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺸﺒﺢ ؛ ﻭﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻷﻇ ﹼﻞ ﺃﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺴﺎ ﻗﺪّﺍﻣﻲ‪ .‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻘﻄﹼﻊ ﻭﻳﺒﲏ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺴﺎﻭﻕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﳏﺎﻳﺪﺓ ؟ ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺣ ّﺪ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻦ ﺣ ّﺪ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪.‬‬
‫ﺢ ﰲ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻷﻭﻗﺎﺕ؛ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺟ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﻀ ِﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺼ ّ‬
‫ﻭِﻟَﻨ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺟﺪﻭﻯ‪ .‬ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺸﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺁﻥ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﺣﻮﻟﻨﺎ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺮﺍﺽ ﺻﻐﲑﺓ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‬
‫ﺗﺘﺤﺮّﻙ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻫﺎ ﲟﻔﺮﺩﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺼﻮّﺕ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺌﻦّ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﺐ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻫﺬﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺍﻟﺴّﺤﺮﻳّﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﻫﺎ ﺑﺄﺩﱏ ﺗﺄﻣّﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ َﺣ ﱡﻘﻬَﺎ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﻭﻫﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ‬
‫ُﺗ ْﺒ ِﻬَﺘﻨَﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﹼﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻨّﻔﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻣﺘﺄﻛﹼﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﺖ ﻗﺒّﻌﱵ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺰﺍﻧﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ‬
‫ﻚ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ؟ ﻭﺃﺭﻓﻊ ﻋﻘﲑﰐ " ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻻ ﺗﺼﺪّﻗﻪ‬
‫ﹶﻟﹶﺄ ِﺟ ُﺪﻫَﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﹶﺃ ﹶﻓﻜﹸ ْﻨﺖُ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺃﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ﱢﻠ َﻤﻪُ‬
‫ﻼ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺮﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﹸْﻧ ِﻬﻚُ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﰲ ﺗﻌﻘﹼﺐ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﺃﺑﻘﻰ ﻣَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﻋﻴﻨﺎﻱ "‪ ،‬ﻛ ﹼ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺁﺧﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺟﺸّﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﻣﺸﻘﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﺎﺏ ﻷﳌﺲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪94‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺎﺵ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺒّﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻟﻘﺒّﻌﱵ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺧﺎﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﰊ ﺃﶈﻪ ﰲ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﺭﻉ‪ .‬ﺃﻓﻜﻨﺖ‬
‫ﻼ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻨّﻲ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺁﺧﺬ ﰲ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ " ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ "‪ ،‬ﻛ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ‪ :‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺩﻋﻮﻧﺎﻩ ؛ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃﻗﺎﺭﺑﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﺬﺗﻪ‬
‫ﻋﻠﹼﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻲ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﻻﻗﻴﺖ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻳﻮﻡ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﺎ ﱄ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺻﺪﻗﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﻬﺪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﻇﻨّﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻗﻀﻰ ﳓﺒﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻭﻯ‬
‫ﺑﲔ ﺫﻛﺮﻳﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺃﻗﺴﻢ ﺑﺄﻧّﲏ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺻﻠﲏ ﺇﻋﻼﻡ ﲟﻮﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳜﻄﺮ ﺑﺒﺎﱄ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺮ " ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﻼﻝ‪ :‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻟﻌﻠﹼﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻧﺘﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ‪ " .‬ﻓِﺈ ﹶﻻ َﻡ‬
‫ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻞ ؟ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﻮﺍﻋﺚ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼﻧّﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﻊ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺗﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺴ ﱢﺪﺩُ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻻﺗﻨﺎ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺷﻚّ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗُ ﹶﻘﱢﻴﺪُ ﻭﺗُ َ‬
‫ﲝﺴﺒﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧُ ﹶﻜﱢﻴﻒُ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺃﻧﺴﺎﻗﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻌﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺘﻨﻌﺎ ﲟﻮﺕ ﺱ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺴﻔﺮﻩ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ‪ :‬ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈّﻧﻲ ﺃﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻲ‪ .‬ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻴﻨﺒﻮﻉ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻌﺮﻓﺔ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ُﻳﻔِﻴ ُﺪﻧَﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ؛ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻷ ّﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻴّﺪ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ‬
‫ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﳌﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻢ " ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﻠ ّﻲ)‪ ،(16‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺤ ّ‬
‫ﲝﻴﺚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﳓﻮ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﻟﻪ ﳍﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ :‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻌﻘﹼﺐ‬
‫ﻋﻴﻮﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺣﺎﳌﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻄﻠﺐ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﺍﳊﺠّﻪ ﻟﻪ ﺑﺸﺘّﻰ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ِﻣ َﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﺱ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻮﻫّﻢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﺑﻔﺮﻧﺴﺎ‪،‬‬
‫)ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﲝﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻴﻮﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃّﻳﺎﻡ (‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺘّﺨﺬ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺍﳊﺠﺞ ﺳﻔﺴﻄﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﻭﻬﺗﺎﻓﺘﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺗﻪ ) ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ( ﺿ ّﺪ ﺣﺤﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ‪.‬‬

‫ﺇﱃ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻭﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺟ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺟ ّﺪ ﻗﺎﺻﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻷﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻲ ﺗﻔﻠﺢ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ِﻟﺰَﺍﻣًﺎ ﺃﻥ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪95‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻼﺕ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺳﺤﺮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﻨﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻣﻴّﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺇﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺤﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﺼﻼ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﱄ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻋﻴﺶ ﻓﻴﻪ ؟‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﻴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺃﺗﺮ ﹼﻗﺐ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﲤﺜﹼﻞ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺔ‬
‫ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻫﺒﺖ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮﺣﻨّﺎ ﻭﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﻟﺒﺎﺳﻪ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺁﺧﺬ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺬﹼﻛﺮ ﻗﻤﻴﺼﻲ ﺑﺎﳋﺰﺍﻧﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺩﻭﺍﰐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ‪ .‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺄﻟﻮﻓﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻌﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺒﻬﻮ‬
‫ﻳﻔﺘﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﻠﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻼ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳝﻨﻌﲏ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺃﲣﻴّﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﰲ ﻗﻌﺮ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻠﻤﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻭﻗﻊ‬
‫ﻚ ﰲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﳌﱰﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟّﺒﺘّﺔ ﻟﻜﻲ ﺃﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺠ ْﺒ َ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺐ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺮﺏ ﻣﻨﻚ ؟ ﻭﻫﺐ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﻳُ ِ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺩﻋﻮﺗﻪ ﻭﻫﺐ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺩّﺛﺮ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ؟ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺇﻧّﲏ ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﺳﻮﻑ ﹶﺃ ُﻋ ﱡﺪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ‬
‫ﻕ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ‬
‫ﺼ ْﺪ ٍ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨّﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﳚﺴﺮ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﻡ ﺑ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻨّﻒ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ؟ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﱄ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺘﻈﻢ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺗﺘﺎﱄ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺗﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﺨﻴّﻠﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻘﺪّﻡ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻘﺪّﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﳛﺪﺙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻳﻌﻘﺐ ﺑﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺣﺪﺙ‪ .‬ﺣﻴﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﳊﻈﺔ ﻏﺰﻭﺍ ﻟﻠﺤﻠﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺘﻮﺭّﻁ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﰲ ﻧﻔﻲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺼ ٍﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﻴّﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩ ﺩﻋﺎﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺜﺒﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﹶﻓ ْ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺒﻨﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻨﺎﺀ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﻬﺗﺠﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻼ ﺍﻧﻘﻄﺎﻉ ﺭﺅﻳﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺟ ّﺪ ﻣﻘﻨﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﻃﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺟﻬﺪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻘﲔ‬
‫ﻒ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‬
‫ﺗﺎ ّﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﳏﻘﹼﲔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻓﺎ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﻻ ﻧﻜ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﺚ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻏﺰﻭ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﻲ ﳛﻔﹼﻨﺎ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺒﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻳّﺚ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ ؛‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮﺡ ‪ :‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪96‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻳّﺚ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺪّﻩ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﺪّﺛﺮ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺼﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻜﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻟﺘﺨﺎﻟﻂ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭِﻧ َﻌ ﱠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﺘﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻕ َﺑﱢﻴ َﻦ ﺍﻻﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺒَﺎ ﹶﻥ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺃﻛﹼﺪﻧﺎ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳍﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺭﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﺠﺄ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻓﺮﺯﳘﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺻﻠﺐ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺟﺒﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﳑّﺎ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﱂ‬
‫ﻳﻔﺘﺮﻕ َﺑﱢﻴ َﻦ ﺍﻹﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻳﺼﲑ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺯ ّ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﺎﺓﹲ ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻮﺍﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻷﻥ‬
‫ﲢﻘﹼﻘﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﻛﻨّﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﺑﺎﳉﺰﻡ ﻬﺑﻮﻳّﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺑﲔ ﺷﻴﺌﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ‪ِ ،‬ﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻓﻊ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺧﻔﻘﺖ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ‬
‫ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﺧﻔﺎﻕ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻌﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻦ‪ ،‬ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺄﻥ َﻳَﺘَﺒ ﱠﺮﹶﺃ ﻣﻦ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﹼﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭ َﺣ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ﻚ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳌﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺸﺄ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺒﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻﻳﻨﺎﻟﻪ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﰲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﲔ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ )‪(١٧‬؛ ﻭ ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﱄ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻼ ﺗﻮﺳّﻂ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ) ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ‪ :‬ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﱄ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ( ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲪﻠﻴّﺔ‪(١٨).‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪97‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﳒﺪ‪َ ،‬ﲝﻖﱟ‪ ،‬ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻧﻔﺲ ﳑّﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘّﻔﻖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ‪.‬‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺃﻭﻻﺋﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺪﺭﻛﻮﻥ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺪ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻭﻣﺄﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺁﻧﻔﺎ‪:‬‬
‫ﺗُ ﹾﻠ ِﺰﻣُﻬُ ْﻢ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟ ّ‬

‫" ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﻭﺓ ﺑﺈﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﻫﻦ؛ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺎﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻫﺖ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺿﻲ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻤﻴﻢ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪...‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ُﻣَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻘﻞﹲ‪،‬‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ)ﻝ(‪".‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻗﺸﻔﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻣﻌﻘﻠﻨﺔ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ َﻋ ﹾﻘ ﹶﻠَﻨﺔﹲ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫ﺃﻥ ﳒﺰﻡ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺈﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻓِﻨ َﻌ ﱠﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺎﻑ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺒﻌﻲ ﺃﻥ َﻧ ﹸﻘ ﱠﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺻﻒ ﻣﺘّﺴﻖ ﻟﻠﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ "ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ"‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻟﻮ ﹸﺃْﺑﻨَﺎ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ َﺧ ِﻔ ﱟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺧﻠﻂ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﻓﻊ ﻋﻘﲑﺗﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺺ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺑﺴﻄﻪ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ‬
‫ﺴُﺒﻨَﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺍﻟّﻨ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺘﺒﺎﻳﻨﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ َﺣ ْ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪّﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴّﺪ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﲝﺬﺍﻓﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ "‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ ﻫﻞ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﻳﺰﻋﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ "ﻋﻘﻠﻨﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺫﺍﻙ ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻓﻜﺮﻳّﺎ ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻱ ؟ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ " ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﻳﺪ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻﻔﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻗﺼﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻄﻰ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻤﻴﻢ " ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ :‬ﻫﻞ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺟﺰﺋﻴّﺔ ﺑﺈﻃﻼﻕ ؟ ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺘﺎ ّﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﺤّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺎ ﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻌﻠ ّﻲ ﳓﻦ ﺳﻨﺤﺎﻭﻝ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ‬
‫ﻼ ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ ؟‬
‫ﺁﺧﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺐ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﳍﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻺﺩﺭﺍﻙ َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﻯ " ﺩﻭﺍﺓ "‪ ،‬ﻭ" ﻃﺎﻭﻟﺔ " ﻭ " ﻛﺮﺳ ّﻲ ﻟﻮﻳﺲ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺩﺱ ﻋﺸﺮ " ؛ ﻓﻠﻜﻲ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﳉﺰﺋ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﺒﻎ ﺍﳉﺰﺋ ّﻲ ﻟﻘﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻤﺎﺵ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ُﺗ َﻐﺸﱢﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻭﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺴ َﻢ ﱄ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﺬﻝ ﺟﻬﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﺗّﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ‪ .‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍْﺑﺘُ ِ‬
‫ﻓﺘﺒﻴّﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ؛ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭُ ِﻓ َﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻓﺘﺒﻴّﻨﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﻃﻦ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺃﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﻣﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪98‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﻓﻠﺴﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻤﻴﻢ ؟ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﺭﻧﺖ ﺑﲔ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﺑﻴﺖ ﻣﺎ ) ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺑﺼﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﻓﺬﺓ ﻣﱰﻝ ﻣﺎ ( ﻭﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻟﻠﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨﺖ‬
‫ﻱ ﻓﻌﻠ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﻡّ؛ ﻭﺃﻳّﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻟﻠﺠﺰﺋ ّﻲ ؟ ﺇ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻗﻀّﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺒﺎﻱ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻘﻞﹸ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﱴ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻗﺪ " ﺗُﻌُ ﱢﻘ ﹶﻞ‬
‫" ؟ ﺃﻡ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﻫّﻢ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻤﺔ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻼﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻳﻘﻊ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻻ‬
‫ُﻳَﺘَﺒﱠﻴﻦُ‪ ،‬ﻋﻤﻞ ﺻﻘﻞ ﺑﺄﻛﻤﻠﻪ؛ ﺃﻡ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮﺍﺕ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺗﺘﺮﺍﺀﻯ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ؟ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺗﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻵﻥ ؟‬
‫ﻭِﻟ َﻢ ﳓﻦ ﱂ ﻧﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ َﺗ َﻌ ﱠﻘ ﹾﻠﻨَﺎ ُﻩ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﹶﺃ ﱠﻭ ﹶﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ؟ ﻓﻨﺮﻯ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻓﻠﺢ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻓﻼﺡ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﺯﻣﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻓﻠﺢ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﻳ ﹾﻠﺰِﻣﻨَﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺏ "‬


‫ﺺ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮ ﻳﺒﻴّﻦ ﻟﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟّﻨ ّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺪ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ "‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻴّﺰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﳊﺴّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﻬﺑﺎ ﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ َﺗ ﹶﻔﺸﱠﻰ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻓﺸﻞ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻌﺎﻩ ﻷﺟﻞ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﲑﻳﻨﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ)‪ (١٩‬ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻜﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺢّ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻻﺣﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﺗﻌﺘﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺳﻄﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ‪ :‬ﹶﺃﱡﻳ ُﻬﻤَﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺨّﺺ‪ ،‬ﺃﹶﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺃﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ)‪ (٢٠‬؟ ﻓﻨﺠﻴﺐ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪،‬‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ِ ،‬ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲝ ّ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ُﻣ ْﻌَﺘ ﹶﻘﺪٌ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳓﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ " ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺜﺔ‪،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪99‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺕ ﻣُ َﻌ ﹾﻘ ﹶﻠَﻨ ﹰﺔ ﻭﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺍ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﺼﲑ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻭُ ِﺟ َﺪ ْ‬
‫ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﲔ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﻈﺔ ﻭﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ‪.‬‬
‫‪ (٢‬ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‬

‫ﺴﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ‬


‫ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻳﻜﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺃﲨﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﳑﺎﺛﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﹼﱵ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺗﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟ ﹸﻘﺒُﻮِﻟﱠﻴﺔِ؛ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﺻﺢّ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺻﻞ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺏ" ﺃﻥ َﻧ ِﻌ َﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ‬
‫َﻧَﺘَﺒﱠﻴ َﻦ"‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳَُﺘَﺒﱠﻴ َﻦ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﳊ ّﻖ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭﻙُ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﻳﻌَﺎ ِﺭﺽُ ﻭﻳﺘﻐﻠﹼﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﺒﻂ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺳﲑ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﻣﻀﻄﺮّﻭﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺘﺮﻗﹼﺒﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻔﺤّﺼﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﻫﻮ ﳑﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ َﻳ ْﻌ ِﺮﺽُ‬
‫ﺴ ْﺒ ِﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﺮﺡ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﹶﺃ ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﲔ ﻟﻪ ؟ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻨﻔﻊ ﻟﻠ ﱠ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﹸ ِﻌ ِ‬
‫ﺡ ﺃﻭّﻻ ؟ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﺃﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ)‪٢١‬‬
‫ﺸ َﺮ َ‬
‫ﺴَﺒ َﺮ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗُ ﹾﻔ َﻬ َﻢ ﻭﺃﻥ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫( ؟ ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻ ﲣﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﲔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺇﻏﻔﺎﳍﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﺷﺒّﻬﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﺑﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧُ ﹶﻜ ﱢﻮﻥﹸ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭَﻧ ْﺒﻨِﻲ ﳐﻄﹼﻄﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭﳑّﺎ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻻ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺟ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻔﲔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﻢ ﺯﺍﺩﻭﺍ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻥ ﺟﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻﺑ ّﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗّﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻞ ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻹﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﺘﻮﺭّﻉ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫" ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺃﺳﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺃﺳﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻴّﻦ"‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪100‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﺲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺸﺮﺡ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﺼﻮﻏﻬﺎ ﻭﳜﻄﹼﻄﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﹼﺪ‬
‫ﺴﱠﻴ ِﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺴﺎﻭﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﻧﺼﻴﺒﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﺘ ﹾﺄﺳِﻴ ِ‬
‫ﺩﻻﻟﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ‪.‬‬

‫" ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺇﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺧﺎ ّﻡ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻻ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ"‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳒﻌﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻘﻠﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ‬


‫ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﳑﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ؛ ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﹶﻟَﻨَﺘَﺒﱠﻴﻦُ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻠﺒﻞ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﳍﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﳊ ﹾﻜ ِﻤ ﱢﻲ ﻭ‬
‫ﺸﱢﺒ َﻬﻬَﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍ ﹸ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻔﺎﻓﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻄﺎﻭﻋﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺻﻔﺎﺕ ﲡﻌﻠﻬﺎ َﺣﻘِﻴ ﹶﻘ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺄﻥ ُﻧ َ‬
‫ﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮ‪ِ ،‬ﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ِﺑ ﹶﺬِﻟ َ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻ ﹼ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﻌﻠﻪ ﺫﹶﺍ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊﺴّﻲ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﻳﻀﻄﺮّﻩ ﻟﻠﺘﻔﺤّﺺ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻗﹼﺐ ﻭ ﻭﺿﻊ‬
‫ﰐ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻮﻟﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺸّﻔﺎﻓﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺸﺎﺭﻙ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻜﹼﺮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻔﻜ ّﺮ‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺫﺍﺕ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻬﺑﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺲ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﻪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ :‬ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﺤ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪.‬‬

‫ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳُ ْﻨ ِﺰﻝﹸ ﲝﺜﻪ ﰲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺸﹸﺌﻬَﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺟﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ُﺗ ْﻨ ِ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻃﻬّﺮﻧﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪101‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﲏ ﺃﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﻴّﺔ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﺰّﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﲑ ﺑﺎﻃ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻟ َﻮ ْﻋِﻴﱠﻴ ِﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺜﲑ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﱐ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻳﺎ ﺃﻭ ﲨﻞ ﺍﳋﻼﻳﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﺴﺐ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺷﺘّﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﺛﲑ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﺗّﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﳍﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﲑ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺴ ﱢﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺛﺮ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎ ُﻷْﻧ َﻐﺮَﺍ ْﻡ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ـ ِﻟﻨُ َ‬
‫ﺢ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫‪Engramme‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﺕ‬
‫ﲦﺮﺓ ﳌﺴﻠﻚ "ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴّﺔ "‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ ﻟﻠﺪﱠﺍﺭَﺍ ِ‬
‫ﱯ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺘﻤﻴّﺔ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫‪Circuits‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻭﳌﺴﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘﻴّﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺼ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻀﺒﻂ ﺗﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ‪ :‬ﻓﺘﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺜﹼﻼﺙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﱪﺯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺴﺒﺐ " ﻳﻘﻈﺔ " ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺳﻴﺴﻮﻍ ﻟﻨﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ُﻣ ِﻌﲔٌ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ)‪.(٢٢‬‬

‫ﻭﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻢ ﻧﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﻴّﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻜﹼﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﺩ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺸﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴﺒﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﺴّﺪﻳﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺘﺒﻘﻰ ﻓﺮﺿﻴّﺔ ﺍﳊﺘﻤﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﻣﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﺟﻴّﺪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻴّﻦ‬
‫ﻛﻼﺑﺎﺭﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﳏﻜﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﻼﺻﻘﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﻭﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻼﺻﻘﻴّﺔ " ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ" ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ ﻛﹶﺎِﺋَﻨ ﹰﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ)ﻡ(‪ .‬ﺣﲔ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﲡﺪّﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳏﻜﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺟﺰﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺘﺮﻗﹼﺐ ﺻﻮﺭﻧﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺘﺮﻗﹼﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ؛ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ‪ .‬ﻓِﺈ ﹶﻻ َﻡ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﺐ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ؟ ﹶﻟ َﻌ ْﻤﺮِﻱ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻼ ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪102‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺈﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻣﺎﻋﺪﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺘﺠﻠﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘّﺨﺬ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺎ ﻟﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﹼﻤﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺘﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻘﺪّﻣﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﻠﹼﻢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺂﺭﺍﺀ ﲨﺲ )ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﺎ ﻛﻼﺑﺎﺭﺩ ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ(‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺪﺙ‪ ،‬ﻻﻗﺘﺮﺍﻬﻧﺎ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﻼﺻُ ِﻘﱠﻴ ِﺔ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ‬
‫ﳊ ِﺮﻱﱢ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﱠﺘ ﹶ‬
‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﹶ‬
‫ﺤ ِﺪﺙﹸ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﻌَﺘَﺒ َﺮﺓﹶ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﻘﻂ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻲ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺴ ﱢﺪ ٍﺩ‬
‫ﺨﺬﹸ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻏﺮﺽ ﻣُ َ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﱠﺘ َ‬
‫‪thème directeur‬ﺇﺫ ﺗﻨﺘﻈﻢ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ُﺭ ﱠﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﻧﻮﻋﲔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‪ :‬ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺁﻻﻥ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ‬
‫ﻛﺜﲑﺍ‪ " :‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﺀﻩ‪".‬‬

‫ﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺮﺩّﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﳒﺪ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻔﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮ‪ .‬ﺃ ّﻣﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻟﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ْﺒ ِﻘ َﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺳﻴﺘﻮﺟّﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ‬
‫ﱄ ﲟﻔﺮﺩﻩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﰲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺩّﻩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻷ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﲔ ﺃﻭ ﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﲟﻨﺄﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺮﻏﻢ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ .‬ﹶﻓ َﻤ ْﻦ‬
‫ﺫﹶﺍ ﺍﱠﻟﺬِﻱ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺘﻌﺮّﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻠﻜﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﻭﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻵﻻﺕ ﻭﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﻜﺴّﺮ ﻭﺍﳌﻀﻄﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﲤﻨﻊ ﳕﻮّﻩ ﻣﻨﻌﺎ ﻬﻧﺎﺋﻴّﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺘﺄ‬
‫ﺗﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ؟‬

‫ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻟﻠﺨﺮﻭﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﲑﺓ‪ :‬ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺎﻟّﺘﺴﺎﻭﻕ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻹﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻭﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺟﺴﺪﻳّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻊ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪103‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺪ ﳝﻨﻊ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﻟﻴّﺔ ﳏﺾ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺗﻘﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ " ﻳﻘﻈﺔ " ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﺻﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮﺍ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻳﺘﺨﻴّﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺍ ﻭﻳﻐﻴّﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﺎﻭﻗﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﻣﻠﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﲡﻮﺯ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﰲ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﻳّﺔ)‪ .(٢٣‬ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﺪّﺩ ﻭﺗﻔﺴّﺮ ﲡﺪّﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﺗﻀﻤﺤﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺭﻣﻮﺯ ﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫‪ :‬ﻭﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻧﺘﺮﺩّﻯ ﰲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻗﺸﺮﻳّﺔ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﺎﻭﻗﻴّﺔ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﺍ ﻳﻜﺮّﺭﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻼ ﻣﻠﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻻ ﺗﻔﺴّﺮﻫﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﻔﺴّﺮﻫﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﺎﻭﻗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺍﻣﺖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻔﺴّﺮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻔﻠﺢ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻔﺴّﺮ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻛﻼﻣﻬﺎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻔﺤّﺺ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﲟﻌﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﲟﻌﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﺘﻤﻲ‬
‫ﺐ ﻧﺴﻘﺎ ﺁﻟﻴّﺎ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴّﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻨﺎ ﻗﺪ ُﺭ ْﻣﻨَﺎ ﺃﻥ ُﻧﺼِﻴ َ‬
‫ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﻈﻴﻤﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﹸﺃ ِﻋ ْﺪﻧَﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﻫﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻣﻀﻄﺮّﻭﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺼﻮﻍ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻣﺘّﺨﺬﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﳏﺾ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﺮﺏ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﻨﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺘﺨﻠﹼﻰ ﻋﻦ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻵﺛﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ‪.‬ﳚﻮﺯ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ‬
‫ﱐ ؛ ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪،‬‬
‫ﺷﺌﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﻓﻴﻨﺎﺳﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﺟﺴﺪﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻔﺴّﺮ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﺟّﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﻬﺎ ﳓﻦ ﺃﹸﻭ ﹶﻻ ِﺀ ﻣﻀﻄﺮّﻭﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻨﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻴﻮﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﻬﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺧﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻟﻠﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ :‬ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﻳّﺔ ﻭﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪104‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻭﻻ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺄﻝ‪ ،‬ﺃﺗُﺮﺍﻧَﺎ َﺣ ﹶﻠ ﹾﻠﻨَﺎ‬
‫ﺕ‪ :‬ﻭﳓﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ﹾﻈ ِﻬ َﺮ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﲟﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻﻗﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺁﻧﻔﺎ)‪ (٢٤‬؟ َﻫ ْﻴﻬَﺎ َ‬
‫ﺼﻮّﺭ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﺩّﻫﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﺮﺩّﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺘ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬

‫ﻓﺎﳋﺎﺻﻴّﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ " ﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ" ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺛﺨﻮﻧﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺛﺨﻮﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﳚﻌﻠﻬﺎ َﺗَﺘ ﹶﻘ ﱠﻮﻡُ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺱ‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﳍﻮ ﻋﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺍﺏ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻻﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﻟﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺨَﺘ َﺰﻝﹸ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻘﹼﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺮﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺔ ﻗﻄﻌﺔ ﺍﳋﺸﺐ ﺗﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻻﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻳُ ْﻨ ﹶﻔﺬﹸ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﺤﻘﹼﻖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻟ ﹸﻘﺒُﻮِﻟﱠﻴ ِﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺟﻬﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺑﻞ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺭَﺍ َﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﲏ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ؛ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﺩ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻋﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺼﻮﺭ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺑﻂ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺒﻮﻟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻟﻮﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﻘﹼﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺻﻔﺮ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﻨّﺸﺄﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻔﻆ ﺑﺼﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ُﻣ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ‪:‬‬
‫ﺨَﺘ َﺰﻝﹸ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﻻ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻﻳﺴﺘﻔﻴﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻃﻦ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻪ ِﻋ ﱠﻠ ﹶﺔ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻩ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻣﻦ ِﺗ ﹾﻠﻘﹶﺎِﺋ ِﻪ ﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻐﻴﺐ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﳚﺐ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ " ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ‬
‫" ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺗﻨﺴﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺟﺰﺍﺀ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﺘّﺔ ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺷﻔﹼﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻻ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﺾ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺇﱃ ﻋَﺎﹶﻟﻢٍ‪،‬‬
‫ﺤ ِ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ َﻣ ْ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺿﻊ ﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﳛﺪّﺩ ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮﻋﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪105‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴّﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺪّﻓﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﺎﺻﻠﺔ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺃﺟﻨﺒﻴّﺎ‬
‫ﺤﻴِﻲ ﻟﻪ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﻣّﻬﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﹸﻛ ﱞﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْ‬
‫ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻀﻤﲏّ‪ ،‬ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﻧﻌﻢ ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ‬
‫ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﲔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ؟ ﻓﺒﻄﺮﺱ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺷﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻮﺣﻨّﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﲞﺎﺻّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﳌﻼﺻﻘﺔ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭﳏﺾ ﻧﻘﻞ ﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻟﻠﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻳﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳌﻼﻗﺎﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺸﺎﻓﻊ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺧﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻚ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﻓﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ُﻳ ﹾﻈ ِﻬ ُﺮﻩُ‪ ،‬ﻭﺻ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ‪ :‬ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺑﺒﺴﺎﻃﺔ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫ﻟﻨﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﲔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﳊﻤﺮﺍﺀ ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺟﺴﻢ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ ﻳﻈ ﹼﻞ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﺗﺄﺕ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﺗﻔﻴﺪﻩ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻻﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺄﺕ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻮﻗﻔﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺓ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺗﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺪ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ‪ ،‬ﻳﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻻ ﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﻻ ﺑﻮﺭﺕ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺷﺒّﻪ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴﲔ ﺍﳉﺪﺩ‪ .‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﻢ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺍ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﳕﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ) ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ(‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻟﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺄﻝ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ُ ،‬ﺗﺮَﻯ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﺑﺴﻄﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﳒﻴﺐ ‪ :‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺮﻕ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﰐ‬
‫ﱐ ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ َﺑﱢﻴ َﻦ‬
‫ﺖ ﲟﻌﲎ ﻣﻜﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺂﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻘﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻓﹸ ِﻬ َﻤ ْ‬
‫ﺸَﺘ ﱞﻖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄ ّﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﱐ ﳏﺾ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﻓﹸ ِﻬ َﻢ ﲟﻌﲎ ﻣﻜﺎ ﹼ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪106‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎﻓﻌﺔ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﺷﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﲣﻠﹼﻔﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﺑﻴﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ِﺇﻣﱠﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻨﺴﻘﻪ ﺑﺮﻣّﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺮﻓﻀﻪ ﺑﺮﻣّﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻭﻗﻊ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ‬
‫ﱐ ﻭﺣﻠﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﺑﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﺸﺒﻪ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ " ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺎ " ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﳚﺰﻡ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻻﺑ ّﺪ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﱪّﺃ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟّﺘﱪّﺃ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺭﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻴﻮﻡ‪ .‬ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻻﻣﻨﺪﻭﺣﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ُﻧ ِﻘ ﱠﺮ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﺼﻴﺺ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﻧﻘ ّﺮ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﲡﺪّﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﻘ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺻﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﲡﺪّﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺃﻣﺮﻱ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺭﻯ ﻗﺒّﻌﺔ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﻴّﺪ ﺑﻨﻤﻂ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻃﻒ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺭﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻮ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﺮﺳ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻈﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻋﺒّﺮ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﲏ)‪) (٢٥‬ﻥ(‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﱄ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺻﻮﺭﺗﻪ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ )ﻩ( ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴ ّﺪﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺪّﺩﻳّﺔ؛ ﺑﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻸﻧّﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ "‬
‫ﺹ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﻴّﻨﻬﺎ "‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻴّﻦ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻫﻴﺌﺎﺗﻪ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺄﰐ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﻈ ّﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻲ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳُ ْﻨ ِﻜﺮُ َﺑﱢﻴ َﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺣﺴّﻲ ﻭﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ " ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﺔ "‪ .‬ﻓﻮﺍﺣﺪ‬
‫ﺼ َﺮ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ‪ :‬ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﻳﺼﲑ ِﻟﺰَﺍﻣًﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ﹾﻘ ِ‬
‫ﺖ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﻨﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﺪﺍﻋﻰ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ .‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ﹾﺜِﺒ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭﺗﻨﺴﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﻴّﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻏﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺪّﺩﺓ‪:‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪107‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺁﻧﺌﺬ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﳑﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺤﺘﻮﻯ ﺫﻱ ﺛﺨﻮﻧﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﻳﺼﺒﺢ ﺃﻣﺮﺍ ﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻛﺴﺒﻨﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺮﺭﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴّﻴﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺼﲑ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺇﳊﺎﺣﺎ؛ ﻭﻟﻦ ﻳﻨﻔﻊ َﺑ ْﻌﺪُ ﺍﻟ ﱢﻠﻮَﺍ ﹸﺫ ﲝﻴﻞ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﲔ ﱂ ﳜﺘﺎﺭﻭﺍ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻮﺍ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻳﻔﻴﺾ ﲟﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﻭﺑﻘﻴﻤﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍﺀ؛ ﻭﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﺴﺪّﺩ ﻭﳜﺘﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ :‬ﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﳍﻮ ﻛﺎﻑ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻳﻘﻮّﺽ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻘﻮﻳﺾ ﺻﺪﻕ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﻬﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳓﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ‬


‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺤﻖﱟ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺾ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﻭِﺑ َ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﳑّﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻄﻞ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻻ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﻟﺘﺒﺪﻭ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺩﺧﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﳊﺴّﻲ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﹸْﺑ ِﻘ َﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻷﺧﺲّ‪ ،‬ﳎﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻠﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺴّﻬﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭ" ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﺗّﺮ ﺍﻷﺿﻌﻒ "‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﺎﻣﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﻗﺎﺭّﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻷﻏﺮﺍﺽ ﺍﳌﺴﺪّﺩﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﳚﻮﺯ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟‬

‫ﻱ ﳓﻮ ﳛﺼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﻭﺠﻤﻟﻴﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻴﺐ‪ ،‬ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺄﻥ ﳜﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ؟ ﺃﺑﺄﻥ ﺗُ َﻌ ﱠﻠ َﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ ،‬ﺃﻡ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻬﺎ ﳌﺼﻠﺤﺘﻪ ؟ ﻓﺈﺫﹰﺍ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻟﻨﺠﺪ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻛﻠﹼﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺗﺴﺎﺀﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﺎ‪ :‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺪّﺩ ﺍﻷﺭﻭﺍﺡ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﳌﺼﻠﺤﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻻ ﺗﻜﺎﺩ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎﻬﺗﺎ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺪّﺩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﺎﺕ ﻭﺃﻥ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪108‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻻ ﳜﻠﻖ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﳌﺼﻠﺤﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺇﺫ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺸﻔﹼﺎﻓﻴّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻮﻧﺔ ؟ ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﻭﹶﺃﻧﱠﻰ ﻟﻠ ّ‬
‫ﹶﺃﻧﱠﻰ ﻟﻠﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ْﺒ ِﺪ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﺘﺼﻴﺒﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒّﻊ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﻨﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﻷﺟﻞ‬
‫ﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺽ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺁﻧﻔﺎ ﺣﺮﺝ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ِﻟﻤَﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺘﻘﺮﺍ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ‬
‫ﱂ ﻳﺒﻠﻎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﻋﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺑﺄﻛﻤﻠﻪ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻔﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺪﺛﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺳّﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﻊ ﺍﻟﺘّﻮﺳّﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣُ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ﹰﺔ ﻻ ﻟﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﻭﻻ‬
‫ﻟﻐﲑﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺨﻴﻨﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺻﻖ‬
‫ﱐ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺗﺎ ّﻡ ﺍﻟﺸّﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﻜﺎ ﹼ‬
‫؟‬
‫ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﲔ ُﻳﺠَﺎ ُﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﺬﻫﺐ ﻟﻴﺼﻴﺐ ﺻﻮﺭﻩ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻮﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ)‪ .(٢٦‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﳋﻠﻂ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﱠﺘ ْﻤﺜِﻴ ﹸﻞ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺁﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﺃﻭﺃﻧﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻣﻜﺎﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﺰﺍﻧﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﺸﺒﻪ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﻫّﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻃﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ‬
‫ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﻃﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺴﲑ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻴّﻦ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ‪ :‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻋﻀﻮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺟﺴﻢ ﲡﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﺳﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺲ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺠﺮّﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻋﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﺈﻬﺑﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻷﺻﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ‬
‫ﺃﲪﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﺃﻭ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻄ ّ‬
‫ﻀﻤُﻮ َﻣﺔﹰ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﻴﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﺸﺎﻁ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﳘﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺍﶈﺎﻝ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ‬
‫َﻣ ْ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺘﺮﺽ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻠﺔ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳒﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺭﺓ ﺍﶈﺼّﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﺳﻠﺒﻴّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺤ ﱠﻠ ٍﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳّﺎ‪ .‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ِﺑﻤُ ِ‬
‫ﻭﻓﻌﻼ ﺑﺎﳌﻼﺻﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺎﺋﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺖ ﺃﺿﻠﹼﻚ ﳎﺎﺯ ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪109‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻳﺰﻳﻞ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﻨﺘﻘﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺯ‪ِ .‬ﻟَﻴﻜﹸ ْﻦ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﺘﻨﺒﺌﻮﻧﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﲢﺖ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﺯ ؟ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻫﻲ ﳎﺎﺯﻳّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻚ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ‪،‬‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻘﻮﻡ ﲢﺖ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ‪ .‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻠﺘﺨﱪﻭﻧﺎ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻲﺀ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺴﻤّﻲ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﺘﺤﺪّﺩ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﰲ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ‬
‫ﻱ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩﻩ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ َﺣ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ﻟﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻧﻄﻠﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻵﰐ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﰲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻋﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺪّﺩ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻷﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺷﻲﺀ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻌﻞ‬
‫ﺸﺄﹸ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻟﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧُ ْﻨ ِ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﺮﺟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻭﻋﻲ‬
‫ﻧﺮﺩّﻩ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻭﺷﻔﹼﺎﻓﻴّﺔ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﺔ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ‬
‫ﺸَﺒ َﻌﺔﹲ ﻓﻜﺮﺍ "‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻔﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ " ﻣُ َﻌ ﹾﻘ ﹶﻠَﻨﺔﹲ " ﻭﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ " ﻣُ ْ‬
‫ﲟﺤﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻔﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻜﹼﺮ‬
‫ﻓﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻜﹼﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؛ ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ)‪ .(٢٧‬ﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺗﺼﲑ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻗﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﲟﻘﺘﻀﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺼﻮﺻﺔ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺐ ﺳﱪﻫﺎ ﻭﺗﻔﺤّﺼﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺒﺴﺎﻃﺔ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ‬
‫ﺼﱠﻨﻒُ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺛﺨﲔ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ‪ِ ،‬ﻟﻤَﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭﺓ ﳕﻂ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻩ‪ ،‬ﻳُ َ‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻄﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺿﺮﺑﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺷﻲﺀ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ‪(٢٨).‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪110‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺴﻴّﺎ " ﻓﻬﻮ ُﻣ ﹾﻠﻘﹰﻰ ﻬﺑﺎ‬
‫ﻭﻣّﻤﺎ ﻳﺒﻴّﻦ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ " ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺿﻤﲏّ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺗﻌﻘﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮﺭﻧﻠﻲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻴّﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺩﻻﻟﺘﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻴّﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ " ﻭﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﻨّﺎ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ) ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺳﺒﲑ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺣﲔ ﻗﺎﻝ " ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﺒﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ( ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺪﻟﻮﻝ‪".‬‬

‫ﺖ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻦ‬


‫ﺿ ْ‬
‫ﻓﻬﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻗﺪ ﻓﹸ ِﺮ َ‬
‫ﺍﻷﳓﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺎﻕ ﻣﺜﺎﻻ‬
‫ﻚ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ ‪ :‬ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺑﺴﻤﺔ ) ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﺽ ﻏﻀﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﻔﺘﲔ‪ ،‬ﲤﻄﹼﻂ‬
‫ﺻ ْﺪﻗﹸﻪُ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻗﻰ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ِ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻨﺨﺮﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ ﺍﳊﺎﺟﺒﲔ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ ( ﻓﺄﺩﺭﻛﺖ ﺍﻟﻌﻄﻒ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﻨّﻲ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻭﺟﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺹّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻳﻨﻄﻮﻱ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ؛ ﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﳛﺘﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺼﻴﻼﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻻ ﺃﺳﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺭﺅﻳﺘﻬﺎ ) ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻡّ‪ ،‬ﺍﳋﻼﻳﺎ (‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺣﺼﺮﺍ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻫﻰ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻮ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺛﺮﺍﺀ ﳑّﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ .‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﺟّﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺘﻈﺮﻩ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻔﺤّﺼﻪ ﻭﺃﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺺ ﺍﻵﻧﻒ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﻨﺎ َﺑﱢﻴ َﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻬﺎﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪،‬‬
‫ﺭّﺑﻤﺎ ﺃﺧﻄﺄﻧﺎﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﺯ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧُﻮ ِﻗ َﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﲝﺬﺍﻓﲑﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﻨَﺒ ِﻌﺚﹸ ﰲ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻣﺴﺎ ّﻡ ﻭﺧﻼﻳﺎ ﻭﺫﺍ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺟﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺄﺧﺬ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳔﺮﺝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺎﺻﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟ َﻮ ْﻋِﻴﱠﻴﺔِ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺟّﺐ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﺮﺏ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﲔ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﺟّﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺿﺮﺏ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﲔ " ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻫﺎ"‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪111‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﲔ ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ‪ :‬ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗَُﺒﱢﻴ َﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺘﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻲ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻳّﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺢ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻮﰲ ﺫﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳﲔ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺑﻔﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬﻩ ﱂ ُﻳ ﹾﻔ ِﻠ ْ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣﺴّﻴﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻳُ ﹾﺬ ِﻋﻦُ ﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ؛ ﻭﺭﻓﻌﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺋﺮ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ .‬ﻭﺻﺎﺭﳑﺘﻨﻌﺎ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺼﻮّﺭ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳓﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺼﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﳔﻠﻊ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﺣﺮّﻳﺘﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺩﺧﻠﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ‬
‫ﻁ ﺍﻹﺷﺒﺎﻉ‪.‬‬
‫ﺤﻠﹸﻮ ٍﻝ ﻣُ ﹾﻔ َﺮ ِ‬
‫ﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﺄﺳﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﺘﺤﺠّﺮ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻛ َﻤ ْ‬

‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺷﺮﻋﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻓﺘﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ‪ ،‬ﳓﻤﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺒﻨﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﻛﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﻜﲑ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺁﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺷﺪّﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻫﺒﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﱐ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻣﻀﻄﺮّﻭﻥ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻄﻴّﺔ ﻭﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺒﻌﺎﺛﻴّﺔ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﲏ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻼﺋﻢ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﻷﺣﻴﺎﺯ‬
‫ﻭﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺗﺸﺎﻓﻌﻴّﺔ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺫﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻏﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻀﻤﺤ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻊ ﻓﺮﺿﻴّﺎﺕ ﻛﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻭﻛﺎ ﻭﻭﺭﻧﻚ ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻲ‪ ،‬ﺗﻠﻤﻴﺬ ﻣﺎﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺳﻨﺔ ‪)١٩٠٨‬ﻭ(‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ‪:‬‬

‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻌﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻫﺐ‬
‫ﻋﻨّﺎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺾ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﺿﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﳏﺾ ﺍﺗّﻔﺎﻗﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﹶﺄ َﺧ ﹾﺬﻧَﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻓﺸﻴﺌﺎ ﻧﻔﺼﻠﻬﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺻﺮﻧﺎ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﻣﱰﻭﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ‪،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪112‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﻗﹶﺎَﺑ ﹾﻠﻨَﺎ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻗﺪ ﺟﺮّﺩﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻴﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﹼﻐﺔ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﳓﺎﺀ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﻔﻆ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺼﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻔﻜﹼﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ " ﻭﻗﺎﺋﻊ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ " ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺒﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻮ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺎﺭﺏ‪".‬‬

‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻟﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻹﻬﺑﺎﻡ‪ :‬ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﲢﺖ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻗﺺ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ؛ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻳﺘﻜﻠﹼﻤﻮﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ "‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ "‪ .‬ﻭﳓﻦ ﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻔﺮﺿﻴّﺔ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻟﺪّﻣﺎﻍ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺸﺘﻐﻞ ﻛﺎﻟﻘﻠﺐ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺒﺪ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺔ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ؛ ﺃﻡ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺗﺘّﺼﻞ ﺑﻼ ﲡﺰّﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻡ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﺛﻨﲔ‬
‫ﻱ ﳓﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻨﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؟ ﺃﲟﻌﲎ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ " ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻌﺎ ؟ ﹼﰒ ﺑﺄ ّ‬
‫"‪ ،‬ﻭ " ﲡﺮﻳﺪ " ﻧﻈﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ؟ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﺴﻴﻠﺰﻡ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻓﻘﻂ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ‪.‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺖ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ‬
‫ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺇّﻧﻤﺎ ﺳﻨﺮﺗ ّﺪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﻴّﺪ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ .‬ﺃﻡ ﻫﻞ ﺃﹸْﺑ ِﻄ ﹶﻠ ْ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﻫﻴﺌﺔ ﻭﻋﻴﻴّﺔ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ؟ ﺃﻡ ﻫﻞ ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺛﺮ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮﺑﺔ ﻟﱪﻭﻛﺎ ﳑّﺎ ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻲ ؟ ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻲ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻋﺎﱂ ﻧﻔﺲ ‪ :‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻓﻊ‬
‫ﻚ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻋﻨﻪ ﺿ ّﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺤﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻠ ّﻲ ﻟﱪﻭﻛﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻭﺣﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻦ ﺍﳊ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻊ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻄﻮّﺭ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻄﻮّﺭ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺗﻄﻮّﺭﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ‪ .‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻲ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ‪ ،‬ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﻧﻔﻴﻪ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺉ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳛﺘﻔﻞ ﺑﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻷ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻣّﺔ ﻭﳎﺮّﺩﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﲣﻴّﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺴﲑ ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻋﻠﻤﻴّﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓ ِﻠ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪113‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺃﺩﺧﻠﺖ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻀﻮﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻷﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻓﻄﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻳﺒﻮ‪ ،‬ﺣﲔ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻣﻊ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟ ﹼﺬﺭّﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﲔ " ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ" )‪ (٢٩‬ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﻤ ِﻌ َﻦ ﻓﺤﺼﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻘﺔ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﰲ ﻛﻠﺘﺎ‬
‫ﺍﳊﺎﻟﲔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ)‪).(٣٠‬ﻱ(‬

‫*‬
‫* *‬

‫ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺁﻻﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﹼﻟﱵ ﺃﺩّﺗﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﺒ ِﻄ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻻ ﻛ ﹼﻠﻴّﺎ‪.‬‬

‫"ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺳﺎﺫﺟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻼﺋﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻃﻔﻮﻟﻴّﺔ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻃﻔﻮﻟﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻠﺔ ﺑﺄﻧّﻨﺎ ﳓﺘﻔﻆ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﻛﺮﺓ ﺑﻨﺴﺦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺄﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺼﻔﹼﺤﻬﺎ)ﺃﺃ(‪".‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳍﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ‪ :‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺳﻢ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ‪(٣١) .‬‬

‫"ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﲣﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﻧﻼﻗﻲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ‪ :‬ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﻳّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ)ﺏ ﺏ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ ْﺪ ِﺭ َﻙ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﳓﻜﻢ‪ .‬ﻓﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﲟﺘﺰ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﺖ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺕ ﺟﻴﺸﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺑﻠﹼﻮﺭ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺯﻝ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻘﺪ ﺗﻮﻫّﻤﺖ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺭﺃﺗﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﱂ ﺗﺮﻩ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﺎﺕ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺟﻴﺶ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ " َﺗ َﻤﱡﺜﻞﹲ " ﻟﻠﺠﻴﺶ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺫﻫﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺳﻘﺎﻁ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺒﻠﹼﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﱂ ﻧﺼﻬﺮ ﺫﻛﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳋﻮﻑ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺠﻠﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩّﻳﺎ ﻷﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻌﺠﻞ ﺑﺎﳊﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﻷﻥ ﻧﺴﻴﺊ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻭﻳﻞ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪114‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﻫّﻢ ﺻﻮﺗﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺩﻗﹼﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﺴﻤﻊ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺩﻗﹼﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﻚ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺊ ﻳﻌﻀﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺕ ﻳﺒﺪﻉ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﳛ ﹼﻞ ﳏ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺎﻫﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﺒﺪﻉ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴّﻞ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﻮﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ‬
‫ﺷﻚ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ)ﺗﺖ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﺍﻧﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ‪...‬‬


‫ﺲ ﻭﻳُ ْﺪ َﺭﻙُ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻨﻔ ّ‬
‫ﺤ ﱡ‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻ ﻗﻮﻳّﺎ ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻘﻨﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺸﻌﺮﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮ ٍﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﳛﺪﺙ؛ ﻭﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﳍﺎ‬
‫ﱄ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌ ّﻲ ﲝ ّﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺠﻴﺞ ﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ ...‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺻﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﻗﹼﺐ ﺍﳌﻮﻟﻊ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳋﻴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻓﻮﺿﻰ ﺑﺎﳉﺴﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺧﻄﺄ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﻐﺬﹼﻱ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺴﻄﻨﺎﻩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﻟﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺭﺃﻱ‬
‫ﰐ‪ .‬ﻓﺂﻻﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴّﺔ ﻬﺑُ ِﻮﱠﻳ ِﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﱐ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺁﻻﻥ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻼ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺟﺬﺭﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﻜﹼﺮﺍ ﺃﻟﻄﻒ ﻧﻈﺮﺍ ﻭﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﺪﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻬﺑﺘﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺍﳋﻠﻒ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺰﻋﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﻟﻺﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻈ ّﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻫﻲ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺤ َﺪﺛﹶﺎ ِ‬
‫ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﲟﺒﺪﺃ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻛﺎﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺍﺏ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻠﺴﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺳﻨﺨﻠﺺ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﻀﻠﺔ ﺑﻘﻠﺒﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺒﺪﺃ ؟‬
‫ﻓﺄﻥ ﻧﻔﺮّﻕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺍﺏ ﻭﺍﳋﻄﺄ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺗّﺨﺬﻩ ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ " ﺍﳌﺒﻨﻌﺚ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﺍ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ " ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻌﻼﻡ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪115‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ؟ ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ " ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﻌﺚ " ﻟﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳝﻨﺤﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﲝﺴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺣﻜﻢ‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺣﻜﻤﺎ ﺻﺎﺋﺒﺎ ﺃﻡ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﺅﺳّﺲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺃﺷﺒﺎﺡ‪ .‬ﻭﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺷﺒﺎﺡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﺿﺮﻭﺏ ﻛﺜﲑﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺿﺮﺏ ﺃﻭّﻝ ُﻣَﻴ ﱢﻤﻢٌ ﻟﻠﺨﺎﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻣﻴﻤّﻢ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﻃﻦ‪ " ،‬ﻭﻣﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﻭﻣﻐﻤﺾ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺘﻨﺒﻪ‬
‫ﲞﺎﺻّﺔ ﳊﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﻭﻟﻼﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻀّﻌﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﺷﺌﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ " .‬ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻳﺘﻨﻜﹼﺒﻪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﻟﻌﺠﻠﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻟﻐﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﳍﻮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻧﺘﺰﻳﻚ‬
‫‪ ،coenesthésique‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺁﻻﻑ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻨﺎﺛﺮﺓ‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﻜﻤّﻠﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺑﻘﻊ ﺃﻧﺘﻮﺑﺘﻴﻚ ‪ entoptiques.‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﲤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﺫﺍﺕ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﺹ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﺣﻴﺎﺓ ﺑﺮﺃﺳﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻧﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺑﻌﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﱂ ﻧﻌﺪ ﳏﺘﺎﺟﲔ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ " ﺿﺮﺏ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺜﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻟﻸﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﻳﺄﺗﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﱂ ﺗﻌﺪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﳓﻜﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪.‬‬

‫" ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﺣﻼﻣﻨﺎ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﳍﺎﺕ"‬

‫ﻱ ـ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺃﻭ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ـ ﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ‬


‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻋﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﳉﺴﺪ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺃﻭﻣﺄﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻔﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺼﺮُ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ .‬ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮّﺓ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳊﻜﻤ ّﻲ ﻣﺘﺤﻴّﺮﺍ‬
‫ﻳُ ﹾﻘ ِ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪116‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺴﻴّﺔ " ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻋﺘﻘﻪ ﺁﻻﻥ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻭﻣﻀﻄﺮﺑﺎ ﻟﻠﺘّﻌﺎﻗﺒﲔ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭ " ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﲟﻔﺮﺩﻩ ِﻗَﺒ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﻜﻴّﻒ ﲝﺴﺒﻪ‪:‬‬

‫" ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﻔﻜﹼﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻧّﺎ ﻧﻔﻜﹼﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﻫﻲ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﺿﺎﻉ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺗﱰﹼﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺴﺮ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﲑ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻟﻦ ﳜﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻦ‬
‫ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﺭﺍﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺭﻓﹼﺎﻋﺔ ﺍﳌﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﻛﺎﻡ ﻓﺤﻢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻔﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺮﺍﻣﻴﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ‬
‫ﺃﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺷﺮﺩﺕ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺃﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﻇ ﹼﻞ ﺧﻄﺎﻑ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻟﻦ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺎﻭﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮﺓ؛ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﻴﻘﹼﻈﺎ ﻟﺼﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻳﻠﺒﺚ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﻗﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺑﲔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﺎﺯﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﺪﺣﺮﺝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺗﺼ ّﺮ ﻭﺗﺼﻄﻚّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺒﺎﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﻳﺮﺗﺎﺽ ﺑﺴﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺳﻮﻑ ﹸﺃ ِﻗ ﱡﺮ ﰲ ﺫﻫﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘّﻴﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻳﻦ ﺗﺄﰐ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻷﺣﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺸ ّﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﰐ ؟ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻔﺤّﺼﺖ ﺟﻴّﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮﺟﺪﺕ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ ﱂ ﺃﻛﻦ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﶈﺘﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻟﻠﺤﻈﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻃﺎﺋﺮﺍ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻮﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﺑﻌﻴﺪﺓ ﻋﻨّﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪،‬‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺘﻔﺎ ﱄ‪ ،‬ﻟﱪﻫﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﻦ ﻣﻠﻘﻴّﺎ ﺇﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻛﻠﻤﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ‪ ،‬ﲪﻮﻟﺔ ﺛﺮﻳّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻵﻣﺎﻝ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳋﺸﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻐﻀﺐ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺧﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺗﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ‪،‬‬
‫ﻻ ﺗﺬﻫﺐ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﳑّﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻧﺰﻋﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﻗﺪ ﲢﺎﻭﺭﺕ ﻣﻊ ﺻﺪﻳﻖ ﱄ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﻨّﺎ ﻧﺴﲑ ﻫﻠﻰ ﻏﲑ ﻫﺪﻯ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺠ ﹶﻠﺐُ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺄﻟﲏ ﻫﻞ ﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺠﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻭﺍﺗﻨﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﺯﺍ ﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗُ ْ‬
‫ﺍﳋﺰﻳﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﻮﻧﺔ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﺤﻈﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﺮﺿﺖ ﳋﺎﻃﺮﻱ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻚ ﻻ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﳍﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﺎﻷﺷﺠﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺎﻓﲑ‪ .‬ﻓﺬﻛﺮﺕ ﻟﻪ‬
‫‪ Byrrh‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪117‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺎﺩﺙ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ ﺇﻧّﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺮﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ‪ ،‬ﻏﻄﹼﺘﻪ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﺼﻒ ﺍﻷﺷﺠﺎﺭ؛ ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﺻﻔﺤﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﻨﻈﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﻟﻮﺣﺔ ﻣﻌﻠﹼﻘﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺎﻓﺬﺓ‪ ...‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﹸِﺘ َ‬
‫‪)Byrrh‬ﺛﺚ(‪".‬‬

‫ﺖ ﺑﻴّﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ‬


‫ﺿ َﻌ ْ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺁﻻﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭُ ِ‬
‫ﺃﺣﺼﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻏﺮﺿﻬﺎ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻲ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻐﺘﻪ‬
‫ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﲣﻠﹼﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺻﺎ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ‬
‫ﻱ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻑ ﺗﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ؛‬
‫ﳌﺒﺤﺜﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻧﺼﲑ ﻣﻀﻄﺮّﻳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺁﻻﻥ‪ ،‬ﻷﻥ ﻧﺒﲏ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺻﻮﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ﻼ ‪ :‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﲑﺿﻴﻨﺎ ؟ ﻛ ﹼ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻟﺒﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺗﺘﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻭ ﺁﻻﻥ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﳛﺘﻜﻢ ﻟﺸﻬﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﺑﺈﺑﻄﺎﻟﻪ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﺮﻁ ﻭﻗﺼّﺮ ﻣﻌﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻗ ّﺮ ﻟﻠﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﺮﻁ‪ :‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻟﺪﻳﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ‬
‫ﺠ ﹶﻞ ﰲ‬
‫ﺃﲡﻮّﻝ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺀ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻈﻠﻢ؛ ﻓﺸﻌﺮﺕ ﺑﺎﳋﻮﻑ‪ ،‬ﻭﺧﻮﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻳُ َﻌ ﱢ‬
‫ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﻭﳚﻌﻠﲏ ﺁﺧﺬ ﺟﺬﻉ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ :‬ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻋﻨﺪ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﺁﻻﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺣﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﺑﻄﺒﻴﻌﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺰﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺿﻌﻬﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﺍﳌﻴﻤّﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﳌﻴﻤّﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺿ َﻊ‬
‫ﱄ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭُ ِ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻐﻴّﺮ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ .‬ﲝﻴﺚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳋﻴﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﹶﺃ ﱠﻭ ﹶﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺘﺘﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺼّﻐﲑﺓ‪،‬‬
‫ﺗﻌﻘﺒﻬﺎ ﻳﻘﻈﺎﺕ ﻓﺠﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺔ ﺍﳉﺰﻣﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠ ّﻲ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺃﺷ ّﺪ ﻭﺿﻮﺣﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﻻﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣﺴّﻲ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﳊﻜﻢ ـ ﻟﻮ ﻭﺟﺪ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺬﺍﻬﺗﺎ ـ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪118‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻤﻜﹼﻦ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻨﺠﺰ ﺃﻳﺒﺨﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻗ ّﻲ‪ Epoché‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﳕﺘﻨﻊ‬
‫ﻋﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻟﻦ ﺗﻨﺪﺛﺮ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﻜﺘﺴﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﺻﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺣّ‬
‫ﺃﻱ ﺻﻔﺔ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺁﻻﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﳌﻘﻮّﻡ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠ ّﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳔﺘﺎﺭ ‪ :‬ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﳓﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﳓﻦ ﻧﺪﺭﻙ ﺧﻄﺄ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﺒﻬﲔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠﻲ‪ ،‬ﹶﻓﻨُ ﹶﻘ ﱢﻮ ْﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻜﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ‪ :‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‬
‫ﲏ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﳌﺮﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺍﺏ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺣﻠﻢ ﻭﻳﻘﻈﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻭﺩ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫ ّ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺴﺎﻕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻟﻨﻔﺴﻪ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﳍﻲ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﳎﺮّﺩﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺗﺎﺕ ﺍﳊﻠﻢ ﺍﳋﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﻭﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﻈﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻻﳏﺎﻟﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺕ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻥ ﳒﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﻋﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﻌﺎﻻ ُﺣ ﹾﻜ ِﻤﱠﻴﺔﹰ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﺒ َﺪﻋَﺎ ِ‬
‫ﺇﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺃﻋﻄﻴﻨﺎﻫﺎ‪).‬ﺟﺞ(‬

‫ﺼ َﺮ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﹶﻗ ﱠ‬
‫ﻫﻲ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ "‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺬ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺧﺰﳍﺎ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻈﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﺻﺪﺭ ﺣﻜﻤﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﲝﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺟﺴﺪﻱ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ؛ ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻻﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ "ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ "‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﱄ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃﺻﻮﻍ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴّﺔ " ﱄ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﺘﻘﻞ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟ ّﺮ ّﻭﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺻﺮﻑ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻫﻲ ﻻ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﺤ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﺒﻄﺮﺱ "‪ ،‬ﻓ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻟ ّﺮ ّﻭﻳّﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻐﻴّﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻴﻘﻈﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﱘ؛ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ‬
‫ﺃﻛﺘﺸﻒ ﹸﻓﺠَﺎ َﺀ ﹰﺓ ﺑﺄﻧّﲏ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻮّﻧﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﻗﻀﻲ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪119‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﻴﻪ ﺏ" ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ "‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﲏ ﺃﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﺑﺄﻧّﲏ ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴّﻨﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﺎ ﳍﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ‪ :‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺃﺅﺳّﺲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻴّﺔ؛ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺭﺩّﻫﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﳓﺎﺀ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ‬
‫ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣﺴّﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻜﻮّﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣﺴّﻲ ﻣﺎ‪ :‬ﺗﻠﻚ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻤﻨّﻰ ﰲ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﺎﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻨّﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﰲ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ﻟﻠﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ َﺗ َﻌﱡﻴِﻨﻬَﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ‬
‫ﻟﻠ ّﺮ ّﻭﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﳓﺘﺮﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻏﻼﻁ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻭﻣﺄﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ؟ ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ‬
‫ﰊ ﳌﺪﺭﺳﺔ ﻭﺭﺯﺑﻮﺭﻍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩ ﺑﻘﺎﺩﺭﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺭﺿﺎﺋﻨﺎ ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺃﻧّﻬﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﱪّﺁ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﺴﺒّﻘﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻓﻼ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺫﺍﺗﻴّﺔ ؟‬

‫ﺱ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮ َﻭﻭِﻱ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮ ﰲ‬


‫ﺑﻞ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺪ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛّﻨﺎ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﻼ‬
‫ﰊ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺼﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﲡﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋﻴّﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻞ ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﳌﻤﺘﺎﺯﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﻠﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺻﻼ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻥ ؟ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺴﺪّﺩ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺧﻄﺎﻧﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﺐ‪.‬‬

‫) ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺮﻑ ﻋﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﺮّﺏ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪120‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (1‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﺒﺪﺃ ﻓﻜﺮﻳّﺎ ﳛﻘﹼﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻀﻊ‬
‫ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺮّﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳُﻌﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱐ ﺍﻟﺘّﻲ ﺗﻘﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺪّﻻﻟﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (2‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺔ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻘﺼﺪﻫﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﻑ ‪ ، l'objet visé‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲟﺎﻫﻲ ﻫﻴﻮﱃ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﻑ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻳﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﻓﺎ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻻ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ‪.‬‬

‫ﰐ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻃﺎﳌﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﹸﺃﺳْﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ‪.‬‬


‫)‪ (3‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭ ﹼ‬

‫)‪ (4‬ﻭﺃﻫ ّﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺑﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﺔ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ؛ ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻫﺔ ﺍﳋﱪﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺆﻛﹼﺪ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﻤﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ُﻮ ِﻋ ﱢﻲ‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﺍﳍﺎﻡّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺬﹼﺭ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻛﻴﻒ‬
‫ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺤ ﹼﻘ ّﻖ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﹼﻤﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺑﻘﺎﺀ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؟‬

‫)‪ (5‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺫﻛﺮﻫﻢ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻋﲔ ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄِﻲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﲣﻠﻂ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻫﻮﻳّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺔ ﻭﺑﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺔ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﺿ َﻊ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳُ ﱢﻠ َﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ‬


‫)‪ (6‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻭُ ِ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ‬
‫ﻬﺑﻮﻳّﺔ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣﺴّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﻳﺘّﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﺻﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺁﺧﺮﻯ ﻻ ﻳﺘّﺼﻞ ﺑﺄﺻﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻤﻦ ﺷﺄﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﺧﺬﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﲣﻴّﻞ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪121‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (7‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺃﻭﻟﻴّﺔ ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﲢﺼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻭّﻝ ﻭﻫﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﻭﻱّ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﳓﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮّﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺮﻯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﻣﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺣﺼﻮﻻ ﺁﻟﻴﺎ‬
‫)‪ (8‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺻ ّ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻮ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ ﻭ ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ‬
‫ﻭِﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭ َﻣ ْﻌﻠﹸﻮﻡٌ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺗﻨﺎﺯﻉ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺿﻌﻒ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‬
‫ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﺃﻗﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻳﺪﻓﻌﻪ ﻛﻠﹼﻤﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺎ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻵﻟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺾ ﻬﺑﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺠّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﻓﻠﻜﻲ ﻳﺘﻌﺪّﻯ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺩﺭﺟﺔ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺎﻓﺔ ؛ ﻓﻜﻴﻒ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﳓﻦ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻻﳔﻠﻂ ﺑﲔ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺪّﺍ ﻭﺑﲔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﺃﻛﱪ ؟‬

‫)‪ (9‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﲏ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻻﻳﻌﲏ ﺃﻧﻨّﻲ ﻗﺪ ﲣﻴّﻠﺖ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﺃﹸ ْﺩ ِﺭ َﻙ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺃﺧﺬﻱ ﻟﻠﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲ ﻟﻠﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻑ ﰲ ﺧﺎﺻّﻴﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ‪différence‬‬
‫ﻼ ٍ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎ ْﺧِﺘ ﹶ‬
‫‪ ،dans le‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻘﻂ‬ ‫‪caractère de l'acte‬‬
‫ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺁﺧﺬ ﺷﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻛﻮﻥ ﺃﻓﻌﻞ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﺩﺭﻙ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﱄ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳُ َﻌ ﱢﺮﻑُ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻘﻬﺮ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩ‬


‫)‪ (10‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﻱّ‪ ،‬ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺮّﻑ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫ﱄ‪.‬‬
‫ﱄ ﻳﻌﺎﻧﺪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻷ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻭﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﻫﻠﻮﺳﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳍﻠﻮﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪122‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﱄ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳍﻠﻮﺳﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﳌﺘﺠﺪّﺩ ﲟﺎﻫﻮ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺃ ّﻭ ﹼ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﺠ ﱠﺮ ِﺩﻫَﺎ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻧﺪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ‬


‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ِﺑﻤُ َ‬
‫)‪ (11‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺄﺳّﺲ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟ ﹼﻠﻐﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪ .‬ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺗﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﺴّﺮ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﺳّﺲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﻭﺗﻔﺮﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺿﻤﻨﻴّﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺗﺎﻥ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻷﻥ ﳚﺪ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺌﺎ ﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﳏﺘﻮﻯ‬
‫)‪ (12‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﰲ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻻ ﺗُﻮ ِﻛﻞﹸ ﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻭﻭﻭﻗﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺄﺳّﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ْﻌﻄِﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺤﺘﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻹﺛﻨﲔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻀﻲ ﲝﺴﺐ‬
‫ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻳّﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﻭﺃﻳّﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (13‬ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﻳّﻬﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗَُﺒﱢﻴﻦُ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺔ ﻭﻬﻧﺎﺋﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (14‬ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻼ ﺣﻈﺘﻨﺎ ﺭﻗﻢ )‪(٩‬‬

‫)‪ (15‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪.‬‬

‫‪.Erfahrung und‬‬ ‫‪Urteil‬‬ ‫)‪ (16‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪،‬‬


‫ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (17‬ﺃﻱ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﺸﺄﺓ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻳُ ْﻌ َﺮﻑُ‬
‫ﰲ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻌﺮ ﹼ‬

‫)‪ (18‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺀ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗُ ﹾﺄ َﺧﺬﹸ ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﻜﻤﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ِﺑﻤَﺎِﻧ ٍﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺼﺒﺢ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺣﻜﻤ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪123‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻫﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﲪﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ، anté-prédicative‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ‬
‫ﺣُ ﹾﻜ ِﻤﱠﻴ ٍﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (19‬ﻫﻬﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺄﺧﻮﺫﺓ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻷﺭﺳﻄﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (20‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ‪ ،‬ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺰّﺍﻱ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (21‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﺧﺮﻯ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻓﺴﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻛﺎﻷﻭﱃ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻤ ّﺮ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺎ ﻻﻬﻧﺎﻳﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (22‬ﺃﻱ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﰲ ﺳﻠﻮﻛﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺣﻜﻲ ﻟﺴﻠﻮﻙ ﻣﺎ ﳛﺪﺙ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸ ّﻖ ﺍﳉﺴﺪﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﹶﺛ ﱠﻢ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﺔ ﲢﺖ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳊﺘﻤﻴّﺔ ﺍﹼﻟﱵ ﺗﻀﺒﻂ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻳﺎﺗُﺮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ُﻣﻌِﻴﻨًﺎ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ ؟‬

‫)‪ (23‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﺍ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﺧﻼﻕ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪.‬‬

‫ﺴ ّﻲ‬
‫)‪ (24‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻋﺔ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﲔ ﻟﻠﻔﻜﺮ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﻳﻀﻄﺮّﻩ ﻷﻥ‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﹸ ِﻌ ِ‬
‫ﻳﺘﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ ﻫﻮ؟‬

‫)‪ (25‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ‬


‫)‪ (26‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻔﻌﻞ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻻ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ َﻳ ﹾﻔ َﻌ ﹶﻞ ﰲ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻃﻞ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (27‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺎ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻴّﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪124‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (28‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (29‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺃﺑﻄﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (30‬ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺺ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻘﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺤﺚ ﰲ ﺃﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺗّﻔﻘﻮﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺗﻌﺜﺮّﻭﺍ ﻭﺫﻫﺐ ﺃﻣﺮﻫﻢ‬
‫ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﻭﻟﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴّﻨﻮﺍ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻤّﲔ ؛ ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺄﺛﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻳﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻋﻄﺎﻟﺔ ﳏﻀﺔ ؟ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﺒّﻂ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻟﲔ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺛﺮﻩ ﺃﻥ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺑﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺈﻃﻼﻕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻧﺴ ّﻲ ﺁﻻﻥ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺳﻴﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻪ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﻵﻥ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (31‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺒﻖ ﺃﻥ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﳌﹼﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﻨﺎ ﻷﺭﺍﺀ ﺳﺒﲑ‪،‬‬
‫ﺹ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻭﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺁﻻﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻛﺎﻥ ُﻳ ِﻘ ﱡﺮ ﲟﺤﺘﻮﻯ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺁﻻﻥ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻫﻮ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻻ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍ ﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻭﻻ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﺻّﺎ ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺫﺍ ﻛﺜﺎﻓﺔ ﺃﻗ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﳐﻠﹼﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ ﻟﺪﻯ ﺁﻻﻥ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺧﺎﻃﺊ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻏﲑ‪.‬‬

‫ﺃ( ﺟﺎﻣﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺲ‪ ، Précis de psychologie‬ﺹ‪،٢١٤ .‬‬


‫ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪. ٥٥٩ .‬‬
‫ﺏ( ﻫﻮﺭﻧﻠﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪Image,Idea and Meaning ،‬‬
‫‪ ،1907‬ﺹ‪٧٥ .‬ـ ‪ .٧٦‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ‪.‬‬
‫‪La pensée concrète‬ﺹ‪.٢٠١ .‬‬ ‫ﺕ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻦ‪،‬‬
‫ﺙ( ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٥٧٨ .‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪125‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺝ( ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٥٨٢ .‬‬
‫ﺡ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٥٨٨ .‬‬
‫‪Les‬‬ ‫ﺥ(ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎﻟﺪﻳﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﶈﺘﻤﻠﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫‪caractéristiques probables de l'image vraie.‬‬
‫ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪.١٩٠٨ ،‬‬
‫ﺩ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪.١٢١ ،‬‬
‫ﻼ ِﺑ ِﻤ ﹾﺜ ٍﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺫ( ﻭﺍﳌﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﻲ ﻧﺎﻗﺸﻪ ﺳﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺤﺔ ‪ ،١٢١‬ﻫﻮ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ َﻣﹶﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﺭ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪. ١٢١ .‬‬
‫ﺯ( ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ‪ ، de l'intelligence‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.١٢٥ .‬‬
‫ﺱ( ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٨٩ .‬‬
‫ﺵ( ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٩٩ .‬‬
‫ﺹ( ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٩٩ .‬‬
‫ﺽ( ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪. ١٠١ .‬‬
‫" ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻁ( ﺗﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪ " .١٠١‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﳋﺎﺯﻝ ﺍﳋﺎﺹّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻧﺪ‬
‫ﻅ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪.١١٥ ،‬‬
‫ﻉ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪. ١١٧ ،‬‬
‫ﻍ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻦ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.١٢٠ .‬‬
‫ﻑ( ﱂ ﻳﻜﻤﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﲔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺳﺒﲑ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻻ ﻻ ﲢﻔﹼﻆ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻘﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﲞﺎﺻّﺔ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﻴّﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﺎ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﻌﺘﻨﻖ ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻕ( ﺳﺒﲑ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ‪ .١٢١ ،‬ﻭﺍﻹﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﻙ( ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻬﺑﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﺄﻥ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻻﻏﺎﺵ ﺍﳌﻔﻴﺪﺓ ﺟﺪّﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﺘّﻨﻔﹼﺴ ّﻲ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻠﻮﺳﺎﺕ‬
‫‪Les‬‬ ‫‪Hallucinations‬‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻤﻌﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻠﻮﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﻠﻔﹼﻈﻴّﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ‪،‬‬
‫‪.‬‬ ‫‪verbales et la parole‬ﺑﺎﺭﻳﺲ‪١٩٣٤ ،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪126‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫‪Nouveau Traité de‬‬ ‫ﻝ( ﻣﺎﻳﺮﺳﻦ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪،‬‬
‫‪Psychologie‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٥٩٤ .‬‬
‫ﻡ( ﻛﻼﺑﺮﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪L'association des idées 1903. ،‬‬
‫ﱄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻥ( ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺻﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻩ( ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺮّﻗﻪ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻖ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ‪.‬‬
‫‪L'aphasie de‬‬ ‫ﻭ( ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻲ‪ ،‬ﺣﺒﺴﺔ ﺑﺮﻭﻛﺎ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻊ ‪ " :‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻣﻴّﺔ" ‪،‬‬
‫‪Broca.‬‬
‫ﻱ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺴّﻠﻮﻛﻴّﻮﻥ‬
‫‪Behaviouristes‬ﻗﺪ ﺃﺑﻄﻠﻮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ :‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻃﺴﻮﻥ " ‪Watson‬‬
‫ﺃﻧﺎ ﺃﺭﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻄﻞ ﺇﺑﻄﺎﻻ ﻬﻧﺎﺋﻴّﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﻴّﻦ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮﺟﻊ ﺭﺟﻮﻋﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴّﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺣﺮﻛﻴّﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﲑﻧﻜﺲ " ‪ Larynx.‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﺴّﻠﻮﻛﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺪ‬
‫ﺃﺣﻮﺍﻻ ﺣ ّ‬
‫‪Journal‬‬ ‫‪of‬‬ ‫ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ .‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴّﻠﻮﻙ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﺤﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ‬
‫‪ ،Philsophy‬ﺟﻮﻳﻠﻴﺔ ‪. ١٩١٣‬‬
‫ﺃﺃ( ﻧﺴﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻠﺔ ‪ ،Système des Beaux - Arts‬ﺹ‪.٢٢‬‬
‫ﺑﺐ( ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﲦﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﺼﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺡ ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ‪Quatre - vingt -un‬‬
‫‪ ،chapitres sur l'esprit et les passions‬ﺹ ‪.٤١‬‬
‫ﺗﺖ( ﻧﺴﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﳉﻤﻴﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪. ١٦‬‬
‫ﺛﺚ( ﺃﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻵﻻﻥ‪ ،N. R. F ، Les propos d'Alain‬ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﺹ‬
‫‪ .٣٣‬ﻭﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺮﺃ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺔ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻒ ﺍﻟﺪّﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﺷﻲ ‪D. Pierre‬‬
‫‪ ،Vachet‬ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﱪﺃ‪La Pensée qui guérit.‬‬
‫ﺟﺞ( ﻭﳌﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺗﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲝ ﹼﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺄﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ " ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻧﺎ" ﻭﺃﻥ ﺃﲣﻴّﻞ ﺟﺴﻢ ﺇﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺣﲔ ﺷﺮﻭﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺇﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﻔﻌﻠﲔ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ‪ .‬ﻭﺭﺃﻱ ﺁﻻﻥ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﺍ ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ُﻳ ْﺮَﺗﻀَﻰ ﻛﻤّﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪127‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫‪IV‬‬
‫ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‬

‫ﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﺙ ﺍﻷﻛﱪ ﰲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻇﻬﻮﺭﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺪ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﻠﹼﺔ‬


‫ﻻﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﻮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ)ﺃ( ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺍﺣﺘﻮﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﺍﻷ ّﻡ‬
‫ﺸﻜﱠﻞ ﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﳏﻀﺔ ﻭﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ)ﺏ(‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ‬
‫ﳍﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ُﻣَﺘ َ‬
‫ﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ُﻣ ﹾﻠ َﺰﻣًﺎ ﺑﻘﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺰﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﺍﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﶈﺾ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﱄ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻓ ّﻦ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﻐﺎﻳﺮﺓ ﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺸﺮﻱّ‪ ،‬ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻝ ﺇﱃ ﺟﺴﺪ ﻭﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ِﺑِﺈ َﺯﺍ ِﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌَﺎﹶﻟ ِﻢ‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﲝﺴﺐ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻳﺒﻘﻰ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﻚ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻤﺎ " ﻳﻨﺘﺴﺐ‬
‫ﻟﻠﻤﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ)ﺕ(")‪ ،(١‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺔ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ " ُﻧ ﹾﻘﺼِﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ّﻡ ﻟﻠﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ)ﺙ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﻻ َﺗ ﱠﺪِﺛﺮُ ﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺤﺒﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺃﻣّﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﻣﺎ ﳚﺐ ﺗﻐﻴﲑﻩ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪128‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺼﻠﺢ ﻷﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ِﻣﺜﹶﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟّﻨﻔﺲ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﻨﻬﺞ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﻘﻰ " ﺍﳋﺰﻝ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ " ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺨﻮ " ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﻫﻼﻟﲔ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﻲّ؛ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻻ ﻳﺄﰐ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺑﻴﺨﻮ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﺒﻌﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺄﰐ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺼﲑ‬
‫ﺕ‬
‫ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎ ﻟﻮﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﲝﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻨﻔﻊ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﺻﻒ ِﻟِﺒ ْﻨﻴَﺎ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﱄ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺱ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﲎ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻳﻘﻊ ﰲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮ ِﻭﱠﻳ ِﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳔﻠﻂ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﻳّﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﺐ‬
‫ﺹ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﻳّﺔ ﻳﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻲ ﺗُ ﹾﻘ ﹶﻠ َ‬
‫ﺿﺮﺏ ﺧﺎ ّ‬
‫ﻧﺘﺎﺋﺠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﲔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑﺪّ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻧﺘﻘﺎﻻ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋﻴّﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ّﻡ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﳕﻂ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻂ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﺍﻟ ّﺮ ّﻭﻳّﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺎﺕ‪ .‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﰲ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻠ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ‬
‫ﺴَﺘَﻨﺪُ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻟﺘﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻲ ﻻﻳﻌﻨﻴﻬﺎ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺩﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ﺃﻡ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺎ ﹸﳌ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ " ﺍﻟﻨّﻤﻮﺫﺝ " ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﺾ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ِﻟ ﹶﻜ ْﻮِﻧ ِﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ ﲣﻴّﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺤّﺖ ﰲ ﺫﺍﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﻮﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪:‬‬
‫" ﻓﻴﺠﻮﺯ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ َﺣ ﱠﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﳑّﻦ ﻳُﻮﹶﻟﻊُ ﺑﺎﳌﻔﺎﺭﻗﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﻣﻌﲎ‬
‫ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺍﳌﻠﺘﺒﺲ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﳊﻴﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺔ)ﺝ(‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻴﻨﺒﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻧﻨﻬﻞ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺑﺎﳊﻘﺎﺋﻖ‬
‫ﺤﻖﱟ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ‬
‫ﺢ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ .‬ﻭِﺑ َ‬
‫ﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻳﺼ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺯﻟﻴّﺔ)ﺡ(‪ " .‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﺼ ّ‬
‫ﻻ ﻧﺒﻐﻲ ﺇﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻟﻠﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺀ ﺑﺸﺘّﻰ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﳍﺎ ﰲ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ .‬ﺑﻴﺪ‬
‫ﻕ ﳓﻮ ﳑﻜﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﳓﻦ ﺳﻮﻑ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺮّﺏ‪ ،‬ﹶﺃ ﹶﻓ ﹶﻠ ْﻢ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﳊﺮ ّ‬
‫ﳒﺮّﺏ)‪ .(٢‬ﻭﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺎﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ُﺗ ْﻌﻄِﻲ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﺧﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﻏﺎﻣﻀﺔ ﻭﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪129‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻟﻠﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﺃ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻘﻮّﺓ ﻭﺩﻓﻌﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﻧﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﺳﺔ ﰲ ﻣﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ )ﻭﻻ‬
‫ﺳﻴّﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻹﻓﻼﻃﻮﻧﻴّﲔ( ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺭُ ِﻗ َﻲ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ُﺭ ِﻗ ﱟﻲ ﺇﱃ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺔ ﺍﶈﻀﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺗﺒّﻴﻨّﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ‬
‫ﻱ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺷﻲﺀ ُﻣ ْﻤَﺘﺪﱞ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﺳﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻔ ّﻦ ﺍﻷﻧﻄﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ‬
‫ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺎﻫّﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪ :‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺒّﻴﻨّﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻠﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺸّﻲﺀ ﺗﺴﺘﻐﺮﻕ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻨﻪ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻴّﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻄﻮّﺭ‬
‫ﺤﻮ‪‬ﺍ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ُﺭ ْﻣﻨَﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﲏ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ُﻧ ُ‬
‫ﺤ ْ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ َﻧ َ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻟﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﺳﺔ ﻭﺗﻮﻛﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ‪ :‬ﺃﻻ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻋﻘﻠﻨﺔ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳋﱪﻳّﺔ)ﺥ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﳚﻮﺯ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺲ ﻭﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﻳﺒﺘﺪﺃ‬
‫ﺤﱡﻴ ِﺮ ﺑﲔ ﲡﺎﺭﺏ ﺫﺍﺕ ﹶﻟ ْﺒ ٍ‬
‫ﳜﻄﻮ ﺧﻄﻮﺓ ﻋﻤﻼﻗﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﻮ ﲣﻠﹼﻰ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﱠﺘ َ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺠﻼﺀ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺃﲝﺎﺛﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺮّﺅﻳﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﻄﻮﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺿﻤﻨﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃّﻧﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻣﺮﺭﻧﺎ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺨﻠﹼﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺎﺋﻔﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﺒّﻘﺔ َﻳ ْﺮﻗﹶﻰ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺃﺭﺳﻄﻮ‪ .‬ﺃﻓﻠﻢ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺸﺮﻉ ﺃﻭّﻻ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻟﻠﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ )ﺳﻮﺍﺀ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺒﻄﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻱ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؟ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﺎُﺗﺮَﻯ ﳍﺬﺍ‬
‫ﻱ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ( ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺴﺎﺅﻝ ‪ :‬ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﱯ ﺃﻭ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﻳ ّ‬
‫ﳘﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﳍﺎ ّﻡ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺃ ﹼ‬
‫ﳓﺪّﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﻭﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﺎُﺗﺮَﻯ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺗﺘﻨﺎﰱ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؟‬
‫ﻭﻫﻠ ّﻢ ﺟﺮّﺍ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺧﱪﻳّﺔ ﻣﺎﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺤﺚ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺋﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ِﻋ ْﺒﻨَﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ‪َ ،‬ﺧ ﹶﻄﺄﹰ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﺎﺩﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﺒﺪﺋﻴّﺔ ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﰊ؛‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻧﻔﻌﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﲡﺮ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺆ ّﺳﺲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺳ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪130‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻑ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﻌﲑ ﻣﻨﺎﻫﺠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﺮّﻳﺎﺿﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺟﻴّﺔ)‪ ،(٣‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﺻﻔﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺳﻴﻜﻮﻥ " ﻋﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺠ َﺰ ﰲ ﳎﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮ ِﺩ َﺑﺎﻃ َﻦ ﺍﻟﻌَﺎﹶﻟ ِﻢ ﺃﲝﺎﺛﺎ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ "؛ ﻭ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳُ ْﻨ ِ‬
‫ﻭﲢﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻤﺎ ﺗﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻠﻮﺟﻴﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﺎﱄ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﻓﻬﻮ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺘﻜﻠﹼﻢ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻦ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺣﺪﺳﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ)‪ .(٤‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﲡﺮﺑﺔ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﲡﺮﺑﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓِﺈﺫﹰﺍ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﲝﺚ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻣﺴﻌﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﰲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﳐﺼﻮﺹ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﰒﹼ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻌﺪﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﳓ ّﺪ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻠﺤﺪﺱ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺮ َﻭ ِﻭ ّ‬
‫ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻴﻨّﺎ ﲨﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﺸّﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺤﻘﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﲏ ﺇﱃ ﺍﶈﺘﻤﻞ ﻓﻨﺴﺘﺨﱪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻨﺌﺬ ﻓﻘﻂ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻘﻴ ّ‬
‫ﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ‪.‬‬
‫ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺸﺮ ّ‬

‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﲟﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺑﺄﻥ ﺃﻓﺎﺩﻧﺎ ﲟﻨﻬﺞ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ "‬
‫ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ " ﺃﺻﻮﻝ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﳉﺪّﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻋﺮﺿﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻻ ﻧﺘّﻔﻖ ﻣﻌﻪ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﻣﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﻳﻀﺎ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺷﺮﻭﺣﻪ ﺗﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻘﺎ ﻭﺗﻜﻤﻠﺔ‪ .‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﺎﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﳍﻲ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﺠ ﱠﺰ َﺀﺓﹰ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺑﺴﻄﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﲟﻜﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ‬


‫ﻭﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ُﻣ َ‬
‫ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻄﻤﻊ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﳒﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﳊﻘﺖ ﺑﻨﺎﺀ ﻧﺴﻘﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺭﺷﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻓﻌﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪131‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ‪ Intentionalitât‬ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﳍﻮ ﻣﺪﻋ ّﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﲡﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻋﻨﺪ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻷﳌﺎﻥ ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﻮﻝ ﳓﻦ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ‪ ،‬ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ‪.‬‬

‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ " ﺍﳌﻌﺎﻳﻴﺶ‪ "Erlebnisse‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳋﺎﺻﻴّﺔ‬


‫ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺪﻋﻰ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ " ﺑﺎﳌﻌﺎﻳﻴﺶ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ "‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺑﺄﻧّﻬﺎ " ﺗﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺎ " ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ)ﺩ(‪".‬‬

‫ﻓﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺍﳉﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ‬
‫ﺟﺬﺭﻳّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺃﻳّﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ )ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺜﻨﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻱ ( ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﻭ ّ‬
‫ﺾ ﺃﺧﻄﺎﺀ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﹸﳌﺤَﺎَﻳِﺜﱠﻴ ِﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ‬
‫ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻣﺮّﺍﺕ ﺑﻼ ﻣﻠﻞ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻏﺮﺿﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ َﺗ ْﻨ ِﻘ َ‬
‫ﺗﺮﻭﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺒﲏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﲟﺤﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ) ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﺭﻛﻠ ّﻲ (‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ‪ ،‬ﻻﳏﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ‪ :‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻄﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺗﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻖُ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻠﱠﺒﺲ " ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﻫﻮ ﲤﺜﹼﻞ ﻟﻨﺎ " ﻓﻘﺪ ﺫﻭّﺑﺖ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﻬﺎ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﺤﺼَﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﻠﻮّﻧﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﹼﻤﺴﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﺮﺍﺭﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪،‬‬
‫ﻛﺜﺮﺓ ﻻ ُﺗ ْ‬
‫ﺼﻞﹲ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺤ ﱠ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ " ﲤﺜﹼﻼﺕ "‪ .‬ﺣﺘّﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮ ٍﺓ ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﺎ ُﻣ َ‬
‫ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ ﻭﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺓ ﺫﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺃ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺎ ﻋﻨّﺎ‪(٥).‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪132‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻠ ّﻲ ﺑﺈﻃﻼﻕ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﰲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻻﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄﹶﻰ ﰲ ﻭﻋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ُﻮ ِﻋ ﱢﻲ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻡ‪ ،‬ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﶈﺎﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻟﻪ )ﺫ(‪".‬‬

‫ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺼﺮﻳّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﳌﺴﻴّﺔ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ ﺍﶈﺎﻳﺜﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ‪ :‬ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻻ‬
‫ﻱ‬
‫ﻳﻘﺼﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ِﺑَﺘ َﻮ ﱡﺳ ِﻄﻬَﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺴﺘﻬﺪﻑ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﺍﻵﻥ ﰲ ﻭﻋﻴﻲ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ ﻫﻮ ﻛﻴﻒ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻴﻒ‬
‫ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕ‪ .‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﰐ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻚّ‪ ،‬ﻝ"ﺷﺒﻴﻪ " ﺑﺎﻻﲪﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ " ﺷﺒﻪ ﺃﲪﺮ "‪ :‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ "ﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ " ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻘﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ‬
‫ﺷﺄﻬﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﻌﺎﱃ ﻃﻠﺒﺎ ﻻﻗﺘﻨﺎﺹ ﺍﻷﲪﺮ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ‪.‬‬

‫" ﳚﺐ ﺃ ﹼﻻ ﻧﻐﻔﻞ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺘﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ " ﺗﻠﻮّﺡ" ﺑﺎﻟﻠﹼﻮﻥ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻞ)ﺭ( ) ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺘﻬﺎ " ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ " (‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎ‬
‫ﺟﺬﺭﻳّﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺸﻜﹼﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‪ ،‬ﻋﻦ ﲨﻴﻊ ﻛﻴﻔﻴّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ‪).‬ﺯ("‬

‫ﻱ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻳﺒﺔ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼﻮّﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﺸﻲﺀ‬


‫ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﺮﻯ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻣﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺑﺴﺒﻴﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﻟﻀﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻀﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻗﺪ ﻛﻔﹼﺖ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺎ ؛ ﻓﻬﻲ ﱂ ﺗﻌﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﲟﱰﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ‬
‫ﺍﳌﹸ ﹶﻘ ﱢﻮ ِﻡ ؛ ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻴّﺰ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺨﱢﻴ ﹶﻠ ٍﺔ ﻭﻫﻴﻮﱃ " َﺗ ْﻨﻔﹸﺚﹸ " ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺣﻬﺎ)ﺱ(‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﻣَُﺘ َ‬
‫ﻚ ﻋﻦ ﳏﺾ " ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ "‪،‬‬
‫ﺗﺒﻘﻰ ﺫﺍﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺴّﺒﺐ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﺇﺫ ﻳﻨﻔ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻬﻮ ﻳﺮﻛﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ‪(٦) .‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪133‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫" ﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ)‪(7‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺰﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻛ ّﻮﻧّﺎﻩ‬
‫ﲟﺸﻴﺌﺘﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﲡﻤﻴﻌﺎ ﺣﺮّﺍ ﻟﺘﻤﺜﹼﻼﺕ ﻓﻴﻨﺎ ؟ ﻓﻨﺠﻴﺐ‪ :‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺇ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﲏ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ‪،‬‬
‫ﺤ َﺪﺙﹲ ﺫﻫ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﺍﳊ ّﺮ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺣﺼﻮﻻ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻧُ ْﺒ ِﺪﻋُﻪُ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﺑﻼ ﺷﻚ‪ُ ،‬ﻣ ْ‬
‫ﻓﻔﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺯﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻱ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﲤﺜﹼﻞ ﻟﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﺳﻢ ﲤﺜﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﻫﻮ ُﻣَﺘ َﻤﱠﺜﻞﹲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﺜﹼﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻳﻄﻠﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻﳏﺎﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﻔﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻻﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻣﻜﻨﺔ ؛ ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻻﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇﻃﻼﻗﺎ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﲝﺬﺍﻓﲑﻩ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻨﺪﻗﹼﻖ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺮﺍﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﺋﺬ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ " ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺶ " ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺇﻳّﺎﻧﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺨَﺘ َﺮﻉُ "‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻳﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ " ﺍ ﹶﳌﻌِﻴ ِ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ ْﻬ َﺪﻑُ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ " ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﺍﳌﹸ ْ‬
‫ﻉ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﳔﻠﻂ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﺑﲔ " ﻣﻌﻴﺶ " ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺮﺍﻉ ﺫﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺶ ﻫﻮ ﻗﺪ ﺍ ْﺧﺘُ ِﺮ َ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ)ﺵ(‪ " .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨّﺺ ﻟﺮﺋﻴﺲ ‪ :‬ﻓﻼ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻐﻮﻝ ﳝﻨﻊ ﻋﻨﹼﺎ ﺇﺫﹰﺍ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺮﺩّﳘﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﻤﺎ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻣﻜﻮّﻧﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ‪ِ ،‬ﻟ َﻤﻜﹶﺎ ِﻥ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻼﹼﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﻜ ّﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻓﻌﻠﻴّﺔ؛ ﻭﺇﻧّﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﻬﻢ ﺯﻟﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺸّﻬﻮﺓ ﻗﻮﻳّﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻧﺘﺮﻙ ﺗﻠﻚ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺳﻄﻮﺭﻳّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻧﻌﺒﺄ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺎﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﺼﻴﻞ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﺎﺩ ﻟﻠﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺻﻤﻴﻢ ﻋﺪﻣﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﹶﺃﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻣﺎﺷﺌﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪.‬‬

‫ﺴ ٍﺮ َﺟﻠِﻴ ﹶﻞ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﺾ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻨﺎ ﹶﻟﻨُ ﹶﻘ ﱢﺪﺭُ ِﺑﻴُ ْ‬
‫ﻀ ِﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻋﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺻﺒﺤﺖ ِﺑ ْﻨَﻴ ﹰﺔ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺘﻘﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻟ ﹶﻔ ْ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ ﻟﻠﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻭﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﻴّﺎ ﺫﺍ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﲟﻮﺿﻮﻉ‬
‫ﻣﻔﺎﺭﻕ‪ .‬ﻓﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻔﻮﺳﻔﺮﺳﻴّﺔ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﺛﺮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﹼﻔﻪ ﰲ ﻭﻋﻴﻲ‬
‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲ ﻟﺒﻄﺮﺱ‪ :‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺫﻱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺼﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ‪،‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪134‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﳌﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﻻﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﰲ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻔﻲ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ َﺭﹾﺃﺳًﺎ ﺑﺒﻄﺮﺱ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ)‪ (٨‬ﻭﺑﺪﻓﻌﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﺗﺒﻄﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻄﻼﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﺎ ﺍ ﹸﳌﺤَﺎِﻳِﺜﱠﻴ ِﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﻋﺐ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ‬
‫ﺺ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﺒﺢ ﲟﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﳋﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺸّﺒﺢ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻖ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﳜ ّ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ " ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﳐﺘﺰﻟﺔ "‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳍﻮﻣﻮﻧﻜﻠﻮﺱ ‪ Homunculus‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳚﺮّﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﱂ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻛﺎ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺋﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴّﻴﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻤّﺎ ﺃﻟﻘﻴﻨﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻛﹼﺪ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺮﺱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻮﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﻭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻪ ﻗﺪ ﺧﻠﹼﺺ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻐﻤﻮﺽ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ ﰲ‬
‫ِﻭ ْﺯ ٍﺭ ﺛﻘﻴﻞ ﻭﳏﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺗﻠ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﱂ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﺭﺷﺎﺩﺍﺕ‪ :‬ﻭﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ‬
‫ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍﲰﺎ ﻧﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳓﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﰲ ﺍﺳﺘﻬﺪﺍﻓﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺷﻲﺀ ﻗﺪ ﳝﻨﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﺸﺒّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ )ﺃﻟﻮﺍﺡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺭﺳﻮﻡ ﻭﺻﻮﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴّﺔ ( ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺖ ﻟﻠﻔﺼﻞ ﻓﺼﻼ ﺟﺬﺭﻳّﺎ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﺮ ّﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻛﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻳّﺔ ﻗﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﻓﻴﻨﺎ‪ .‬ﻭِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮﺓٍ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﺒﺤﺴﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺆﻭّﻝ ﻟﻮﺣﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻮﺗﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴّﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻻ‬
‫ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﺴﺘﺤﻀﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ‪ :‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇﺣﺎﻟﺔ ﻻﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﻟﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻓﻮﺗﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﻮﺟّﺐ‬
‫ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻔﻬﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻠ ّﻢ ﺟﺮّﺍ‪ .‬ﻭﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﳓﻮ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺸﱢﺒ َﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻓﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺃﳓﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺎ ﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﱐﹼ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ َ‬
‫ﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺑﺄﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺎ ﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ " ﻧﻔﺴ ّﻲ "‪ .‬ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﻨﻮﻋﲔ‬
‫ﻟﻮﺣﺔ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﳐﺘﻠﻔﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ " ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠ ّﻲ "‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺪﺀ ﺑﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﺎﻫﺎ ﲟﻮﺿﻊ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪135‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻣﻦ " ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ " ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﹶﻟﹶﺄ ْﻫﻞﹲ ِﻟﹶﺄ ﹾﻥ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺣﻴﺚ ﺣﻠﹼﻞ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‬
‫ﺃﺧﺬﺍ ﻗﺼﺪّﻳﺎ ﻟﺮﺳﻢ ﻟﺪﻭﺭﺭ‪Dürer‬‬

‫" ﻓﻠﻨﻌﺘﱪ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺩﻭﺭﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺱ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻴﻄﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩّﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻘﹸﻪُ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ " ﺍﻟﺮّﺳﻢ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ ﳎﻠﹼﺪ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺫﺍﻙ‪(٩ )".‬‬
‫ﺴﻮﺩﺍﺀ‪،‬‬
‫ﹼﰒ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺑﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺗﻠﻜﻢ ﺍﳋﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻟ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻐﲑﺓ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻠﻮّﻧﺔ‪ ،‬ﻳﻈﻬﺮﻟﻨﺎ " ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﳑﺘﻂ ﻓﺮﺳﺎ "‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ" ﺍﳌﻮﺕ "‪ ،‬ﻭ"‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻴﻄﺎﻥ "‪ .‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﺣﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺻﺪﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻴﻊ ‪:‬‬
‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺻﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻣﺘﻤﺜﹼﻠﺔ " ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺑﺎﻷﺣﺮﻯ ﻧﻜﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﺻﺪﻳﻦ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻠ ﹶﺔ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺱ ﺑﻠﺤﻤﻪ ﻭﻋﻀﻤﻪ ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ‪).‬ﺹ("‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺎﺕ " ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َ‬

‫ﺺ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ )ﺽ(‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ‬


‫ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟّﻨ ّ‬
‫ﱄ ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺭﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻴﻄﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻫﻲ ﻻ‬
‫ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻧﺄﺧﺬﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﳉﻤﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﶈﺾ ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩ ﻟﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﻮﻡ ‪ Album.‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻬ ّﻢ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﺃ ﹼﻥ " ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ‪" Thèse‬‬
‫ﻱ)‪)(10‬ﻁ(‪ .‬ﻭﻟﺴﻨﺎ ﻧﻨﻮﻱ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺤﺚ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺤﱢﻴ ِﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻗﺪ ﻧﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ُﻣ َ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻣﺮ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﻔﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲤﻴّﺰ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻨﺸﺄ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺷ ّﺪ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪(١١) .‬‬

‫ﻚ ﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﺩﻫﺎ‬
‫ﺗﻠﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﳌﻘﺘﻀﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻟﻨﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻫﻮ ﻻﺷ ّ‬
‫ﺠ ﱠﺰﹶﺃ ﹰﺓ‪.‬‬
‫ﺗﺪﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﰲ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻐﲑ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻣُ َ‬
‫ﻭﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻋﺎﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﲨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﺸّﻜﻮﻙ ﱂ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪136‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺺ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﺻﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻬﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﳘﺎ "‬
‫ﺨ ﹸﻠ ْ‬
‫َﻧ ْ‬
‫َﻣﻌِﻴﺸَﺎ ِﻥ " ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺎﻥ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺑﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺘﻬﻤﺎ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜ ّﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ؟‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻭﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‬
‫ﻭﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻦ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ؟ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻭﺻﻒ ﻣﺎﻫﻮ ّ‬
‫ﺠَﺒﺮُﻭ ﹶﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺄﰐ ﺑﺄﻧﻔﺴﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ‪.‬‬
‫ﱂ ﻳﺰﺩ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ُﻣ ْ‬
‫ﻭﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﺑﻼ ﺣ ﹼﻞ‪ :‬ﺇﺫ ﳓﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻱ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ "‬
‫ﹶﺃﹶﺛ ِﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﻋﺎﻣّﺎ ﻟِﻘﺴﻢ ﻛﺒﲑ ﻗﺼﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ "‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺳﻨﺴﻤّﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻨﺎ ﱂ ﳒﺪ ﺃﻓﻀﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘّﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﻠﻢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﳍﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺃّﻧﻬﻤﺎ ﳜﺘﻠﻔﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﰲ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺘﻬﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻬﻤﺎ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳋﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﻟﺴّﻮﺩ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺗﺼﻠﺢ‬
‫ﺴﻮَﺍ ِﺀ ﻟﺘﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ " ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺱ " ﺃﻭ ﻟﺘﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ "ﳋﻄﻮﻁ ﺳﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻔﺤﺔ ﻭﺭﻗﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟ ﱠ‬
‫ﺢ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻛﻠﹼﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ؟ ﻫﻞ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‬
‫ﺼﱡ‬‫ﺑﻴﻀﺎﺀ "‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﹶﺃَﻳ ِ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺲ ﻫﻴﻮﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮ ٍﺓ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻫﻴﻮﱃ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ؟ ﻳﺸﺒﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ )ﻅ( ﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﺇﺫ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻸ " ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﳋﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ِﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﻧّﺎ‬
‫ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﺔ ﺃﻥ " َﺗ ْﻤ َ‬
‫ﺙ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﻋﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺗﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻓ ﹼﻜﺮﺕ ﰲ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻓﻜﹼﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺃﹸ ْﺣ ِﺪ ﹶ‬
‫ﻟﻔﻈﺔ " ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ "‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻜﻲ ﺃﻣﻸ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳋﺎﻭﻱ ﻭﺃﺟﻌﻠﻪ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﺣﺪﺳﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ‬
‫ﻳﺴﺘﻮﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻛﻮّﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻋﺼﻔﻮﺭ ﺑﻠﺤﻤﻪ ﻭﻋﻈﻤﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﻸ ﺍﻟ ﱠﺪ ﹶﻻﹶﻟ ﹶﺔ‬
‫ﺴَﺘ َﺪ ﱡﻝ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﲤﻠﻚ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﻣﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ ﻭﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﺸِﺒﻪُ ﺃﻧّﻪ ُﻳ ْ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻳُ ْ‬
‫ﲏ‬
‫ﺍﻣﺘﻼﺀ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ)ﻉ(‪ .‬ﻭﻓﻀﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻣﻴّﺰ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﰲ ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬
‫‪ Vorlesungen‬ﻥ ‪nomenologie des‬‬ ‫ﻟﻠﺰّﻣﻦ‪zur Ph‬‬
‫‪ ،inneren Zeitbewusstseins‬ﻭَﺍ ِﻓ َﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺍﻟﺘّﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻚ ‪ Retention‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﳓﻮ‬
‫ﺴ ِ‬
‫ﺇﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺃﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﻭﻣﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻴﻔﻴّﺎﻬﺗﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﹶﳌ ْ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪137‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻆ ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎﺽ‪.‬‬
‫ﺤ ﹾﻔ ِ‬
‫ِﻟ ِ‬ ‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﺿﻊ‪non- posionel‬‬
‫ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍ ْﺳِﺘ ْﻤﺜﹶﺎِﻟ ﱟﻲ‪ Unselbst‬ﻥ‪ ،ndigkeit‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﰲ ﻭﻋﻲ ُﻣ َﻐﱠﻴ ٍﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺔ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﻴّﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻤﺜﻼ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺩﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﺴﺮﺣﺎ ﻣﻀﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﻓﺄﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺴّﻮﺍﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺃﻋﺎﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻲ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺫﺍﻛﺮﰐ ) ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ‬
‫ﺖ ﺭﺃﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻓﺬ ﻣﻀﺎﺀﺓ ‪ (...‬ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﺣﻔﻠﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺮﺡ‪ " (...‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻣﺮﺭﺕ‪ ،‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳌﺴﺎﺀ‪ ،‬ﹸﻛ ْﻨ ُ‬
‫ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﱢﺬ ﹾﻛﺮَﻯ‪ :‬ﻭﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻷﻧّﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧُ َﺮ ﱢﻭ َ‬
‫ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﳌﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﳌﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ‪ ،‬ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﻋﻴﺎ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺎ ُﻣ َﻐﱠﻴﺮًﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ َﻭ ْﻋﻴًﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ‬
‫‪Coefficient‬ﺍﳌﺎﺿﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻴﺸﺒﻪ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﻷﺻﻮﻝ ﲡﺪﻳﺪ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﺳﺠﲔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﱘ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗ ﹼﻞ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻬﺑﻴﻮﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺟﺬﺭ ّ‬
‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﳌﻨﺒﻌﺚ‪).‬ﻍ(‬
‫ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫ﻓﻠﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻧﻼﻗﻲ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﻬﺑﺔ ﻟﻠﹼﱵ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﻗﻔﺘﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ‬
‫ﺍﻵﻧﻒ‪.‬‬

‫ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺇﲤﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺒﺪﻭ ﺃﻧّﻪ‪ ،‬ﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺎﺩّﻬﺗﻤﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻴﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻌﺐ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﺑﻮﺿﻌﻪ ﻟﻠﻌﺎﱂ ﺑﲔ " َﻣ ْﻌﻘﹸﻮ ﹶﻓ ْﻴ ِﻦ " ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﱂ ﻳﻔﻘﺪﻩ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻲ ــ ﻋﺎﱂ ﺻﺎﺭﺕ ﻏﲑ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﻌﲎ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﺎﻟﻘﻄﻊ ﻫﻮ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺣﺼﻮﻻ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺍ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﻤﻴّﺰ‬
‫ﳎﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟ ِﻔ ْﻌ ِﻠﱠﻴ ِﺔ ﻟﻠﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻋﻲ )ﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ ﻭ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ُﺗﺤِﻴﻴﻬَﺎ (‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ‪ " ،‬ﺍﳌﻌﲎ " ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺴﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴّﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻌﻴّﻨﺔ ﺗﺴﻤّﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﺯ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻠﺒﺴﻪ ﻳﺴﻤّﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﻮّﺍﻡ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺜﻼ " ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛﺔﹸ " ﻫﻲ ﻧﻮّﺍﻡ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪138‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﱄ ﺍﻵﻥ )ﻑ(‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ " ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻣ ّﻲ " ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﻋﻲ‬
‫ِﻓ ْﻌ ِﻠﻲﱟ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻓﻌﻠ ّﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫" ﻛ ﹼﻞ " ﻣﻌﻴﺶ " ﻫﻮ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻘﺼﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﻈﺮ ﻭﻧﻘﺼﺪ‬
‫ﻣﻜﻮّﻧﺎﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﺗّﺠﺎﻩ ﻋﻜﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﻈﺮ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻛﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ )‪ .(١٢‬ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻼﻗﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺗّﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻷﺧﲑ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﻗﻊ‪،‬‬
‫ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘ ّﻲ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺑﺬﺍﺗﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﺄﻥ " ﻳُﻮ َﺟ َﺪ " ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻓﻘﻂ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ " ُﻣ ْﺪ َﺭﻛﹰﺎ "‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ ﻻ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻛﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺃﻥ "‬
‫ﻳﺪﺭﻙ " ﻻﺗﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ " ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ " ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠ ّﻲ‪(١٣).‬‬

‫ﻓﺎﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ِﻣﺜﹶﺎِﻟﻲﱟ‪ ،‬ﻭﳕﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﳕﻂ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻜﺘﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻠﻨّﻮﺍﺯ‪" :‬ﻓﺄﻳﺪﻭﺱ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ ُﻳﺤِﻴ ﹸﻞ‬
‫‪Lecton‬ﺍﻟﺮّﻭﺍﻗ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻖُ ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﻭﺭ ّ‬
‫ﺇﱃ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺱ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﹼﻨﻮﺍﺯﻱّ؛ ﻭﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﻳﻘﺘﻀﻲ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺀ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺎ‪).‬ﻕ(‬

‫ﻭﺇﻥ ﺗﻘﺮّﺭ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺮّﻕ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴّﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ‬
‫ﻱ ﳑﺘﻸ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ‬
‫ﺨﱠﻴ ﹶﻞ " ﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﻡ ﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﻮﺍﺯ ّ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﺍﳌﺪﺭﻛﺔ ؟ ﺇ ﹼﻥ " ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﳌﹸَﺘ َ‬
‫ﺑﺸﻲﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻜﻨﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺳﻠﻔﺎ‪ .‬ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍ ﺃﻧّﻪ‬
‫ﻭﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﰲ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻡ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﲟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻜﻨﺔ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺫﻭﺍﺗﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﻤﺴﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳓﻀﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻥ‬
‫ﻧﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻋﺪﻧﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﺍﺟﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻤﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﻔﺎﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻋﲔ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﲟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﻜﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﰲ ﺫﺍﰐ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺫﺍﰐ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ‬
‫ﺿ َﻊ ﺑﲔ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻓﲔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ َﻧ ْﻌ ِﺮ ﹶﻓﻪُ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﻧﻮّﺍﻡ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻠﻲّ؛‬
‫ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﻗﺪ ﻭُ ِ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﻻ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﺜﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪139‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺠ ﱠﺮ ِﺩﻫَﺎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋﻤﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ " ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ‬
‫" ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﲟُ َ‬
‫ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛﺔﹸ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻫﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ " ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ُﻣ ْﺪ َﺭﻙٌ " ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﲎ‬
‫ﺤ ﱠﻞ ﺇﱃ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﺎﻳﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﶈﻀﺔ ﻭﺍﺠﻤﻟﺮّﺩﺓ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﲢﺘﺮﻕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ َﺗ ْﻨ َ‬
‫ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﻳﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻤﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺎ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺘﺮﻕ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﺋﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﹸﻗﻮَﻯ ﺃﻭ‬
‫ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪).‬ﻙ(‬

‫ﻱ ﺳﺒﺐ‬
‫ﻱ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺻﻮﺭ ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎﺕ ؟ ﻭﻷ ّ‬
‫ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺃﻳﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ؟ ﻭﻷ ّ‬
‫ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻓﻊ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻤﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈﻧّﺎ ﻧﻠﻔﻰ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴّﺎ ﻭﻋﺎﳌﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻴّﺎ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﺃﻓﻠﻢ‬
‫ﺐ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻴﺐ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻜ ﹼﻞ ﻳﺘﺄﺗّﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ )‪ ،(١٤‬ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﺯ ّ‬
‫ﻭِﻟ ُﻤﺠِﻴ ٍ‬
‫ﺻ ﹶﻞ ﻟﺘﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻴّﺔ ﺑﲔ‬
‫ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺒﻘﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺃﻧﻔﺴﻜﻢ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﹶﺃ ﱠ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺎﺕ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺍﺕ ؟ ﻭﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻣﻴّﺰ‬
‫ﰲ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻧﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭ ﹶﻛ ِﺔ‪.‬‬

‫" ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺸﺠﺮﺓ ﻣﻮﺭﻗﺔ ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻇﻬﺮﺕ ﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﲝﻴﺚ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻜﻲ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻭﺻﻔﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﻌﻤﻞ‬
‫ﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻣﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﳐﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﹼﺍﺕ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ‬
‫ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻻ ﺻﺎﺭﻣﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍ ﹸﳌَﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻘﹶﺎ ِ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺘﺨﻴّﻞ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﺘﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﻈﹼﻬﻮﺭ‬
‫ﺺ‬
‫ﺨ ﱡ‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻳُ َ‬
‫ﺨ ﱡ‬
‫ﺺ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ "ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﺑﻠﺤﻤﻬﺎ ﻭﺩﻣﻬﺎ "‪ ،‬ﻭﻃﻮﺭﺍ ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﺨ ﱡ‬
‫ُﻳ َ‬
‫ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪).‬ﻝ("‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪140‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﻬﻢ ﺫﻟﻚ ؟ ﻭﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳝﻜﻨﲏ ﺃﻥ ﺃﹸ ْﺣِﻴ َﻲ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﹶﺃﻳ‪‬ﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ‬
‫ﻱ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻟﻞ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ " ﺃﻭ "ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺍﳌﹸ ْﺪ َﺭ ِﻙ " ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ‬
‫ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﺷﺎﺀ ؟ ﻭﺃ ّ‬
‫؟ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺃﻥ ﳕﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﻭﺻﻞ ﺍﻟّﻨﻮﺍﻡ " ﺍﻟﺸّﺠﺮﺓ ﺍﳌﻮﺭﻗﺔ " ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨﻮّﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﳌﺘﻘﺪّﻣﺔ ﺣﺘّﻰ‬
‫ﺃﺅﺳّﺲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻣﺎ ؟ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻟﻜﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﻌﻞ ﺑﺈﺯﺍﺀ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺩﻭﺭﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﺀ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﺇﻣّﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺸّﻲﺀ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻋﻠﻢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻼﻥ ﺇﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﹶﺃﻣﱠﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻜﻠﹼﻨﺎ ﳝﻜﻨﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳛﻲ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻩ ﺣﺘّﻰ ﳚﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ‬
‫ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻬﻴﻮﱃ ﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﳑﻜﻦ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ ﳑﺘﺎﺯﺓ ) ﻟﻮﺣﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﳏﺎﻛﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .( .‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳑﻜﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺴّﺮ‬
‫ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻣﺎ ﰲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺼﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﲟﺎ‬
‫ﻳﺴﻤّﻴﻪ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺪّﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺟﻴّﺪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺇﺣﻴﺎﺀ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﺮّﺳﻢ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﺃﻥ ﲡﻌﻞ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺇّﻧﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﹼﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﻭﺍﻓﻊ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ )ﻷﻧّﻪ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ‬
‫ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺟﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ (.‬ﻭﺑﺎﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ﺇﱃ ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻳﻴﺲ ﺍﳋﺎﺭﺟﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻴﺒﻨﺘﺰ‬
‫ﺻ ِﺮ ﹾﻓﻨَﺎ‬
‫ﻭﺳﺒﲑ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﻟﻨّﺴﺒﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺎ ﳓﻦ ﺃﹸﻭ ﹶﻻﺀِ‪ ،‬ﺑﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ُ‬
‫ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﺇﱃ ﺻﻌﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻖ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺍﻋﺘﺎﺻﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊ ﹼﻞ‪ :‬ﻫﻲ ﻛﻴﻒ‬
‫ﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺧﺼﺎﺋﺺ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ ؟ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﻬﻲ‪ :‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﻋﺴﺎﻧﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺱ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﻣﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺫﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺇﻟﺒﺎﺳﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺔ ؟ ﻓﻔﻲ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﻛﻨّﺎ‬
‫ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺩﻭﺍﻓﻊ ِﺇﹾﻟﺒَﺎ ِ‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺃﺟﺒﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ﻷﻥ ﻧﻌﻴّﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳒﻴﺐ‪ :‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﳌﻮﺍ ّﺩ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻦ‬
‫ﻱ ﺩﺍﻓﻊ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃ ّ‬

‫ﻭﺍﳊ ّﻖ ﺃﻗﻮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻫﻨﺎﻟﻚ ﻟﺪﻯ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﺒﺘﺪﺃ ﳉﻮﺍﺏ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﳋﻴﺎﻝ " ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻳﻌﺰﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﺎﻱ‬
‫"ﻗﺪ ﺷُﱢﺒ َﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﻊ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻌﲔ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﲔ ﺑﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺏ" ﺍﻻﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪141‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﹼﰒ‬
‫ﺴﻲّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳋﱪ ّ‬
‫ﻱ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻓﻼ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﻋﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻼﺕ ﺍﻟﺪّﻳﻜﺎﺭﺗﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﻣﻴ ّﺰ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﲢﺼﻞ‬
‫ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺻﻮﺭﻬﺗﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺴّﻴﻼﻥ ﺍﻟﺰّﻣﲏّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻔﻌّﺎﻟﺔ ) ﺣﻜﻢ‪ ،‬ﺧﻴﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ(‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻓﻌّﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﺛﺮ ﻟﻌﻔﻮﻳّﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﳊﺮّﺓ ؛ ﺃﻣّﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪،‬‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﺄﺗّﻰ‬
‫ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﳏﺾ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﺇﻧّﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺸﺎﻳﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺴﲑ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳﻌﺔ‪ .‬ﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﺗﻔﺴﲑ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﻳّﻤﺎ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﺄﻭّﻻ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻓﻌّﺎﻝ ﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻠﺰﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﰲ ﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ ﺃﻡ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺗﻐﻴﲑ ﰲ ﳕﻂ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ؟ ﻓﻘﺪ ﳚﻮﺯ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﳉﻮﺍﺯ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻧﺘﺼﻮّﺭ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎ ﻓﻌّﺎﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﳛﺼﻞ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺜﺔ‪ .‬ﻓﺴﺒﻴﻨﻮﺯﺍ ﻭﺩﻳﻜﺎﺭﺕ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺴّﺮﺍ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺚ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﺱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻙ‬
‫ﻱ ﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣُ ْﻨَﺒ ِﻌ ٍ‬
‫ﻓﺎﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﻮّﻧﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻋﻔﻮ ّ‬
‫ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﻹﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﻧﻈ ّﻦ)ﻡ( ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻻﻧﻄﺒﺎﻋﻴّﺔ ﻟﻺﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻫﻲ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻼﺀﻡ ﻣﻊ‬
‫ﻱ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﱂ ﻳﺒﺴﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸّﺄﻥ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻀّﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺣﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﻫﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ ﹶﻘ ﱠﻄ َﻊ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﺗﻘﻄﻴﻌﺎ ﺟﺬﺭﻳّﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﺃﺳﻠﻔﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺮّﺅﻳﺔ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﹼﺮ ﺍﳌﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺀ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍ ْﺳِﺘ ْﻤﺜﹶﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻟﻠﺸّﻲﺀ "‬
‫ﺍﳌﺴﺮﺡ ﺍﳌﻀﺎﺀ " ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻧﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﹶﻓَﺒﱢﻴﻦٌ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺑﺘﺄﻟﻴﻒ‬
‫ﱄ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺌﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺑﲔ ﺍﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻛﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ ﺣﺘّﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﻱ‪ .‬ﻓﺈﻣّﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻧﺎ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﲔ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﲔ‬
‫ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﲟﺜﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﳉﺬﺭ ّ‬
‫)ﻭﻫﻮ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﻤﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﺻﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻜ ّﻲ (‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻣّﺎ ﳘﺎ ﺍﻻﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﻥ ﻓﻌّﺎﻻﻥ‪ .‬ﻓﻌﻠﻰ‬
‫ﻂ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻨّﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻴّﺔ ؛ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﱐ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻨﺤﻦ ﻧﻌﻮﺩ ِﺑَﺘ َﻮ ﱡﺳ ٍ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﺨﻠﹼﻰ ﻋﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ "ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻤﺜﺎﻝ "‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻗﻞﹼ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﺃﻋﻄﺎﻩ ﺇﻳّﺎﻫﺎ‬
‫ﲏ ﻟﻠﺰّﻣﻦ‪ .‬ﻭﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ُﺭ ِﺩ ْﺩﻧَﺎ ﺇﱃ‬
‫ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃ ّ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪142‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻣﻌﺎﻳﻨﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﻷﻭﱃ‪ :‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻻﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﰐ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺣﺪﻫﺎ‪ :‬ﻓﻬﻮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻜﺎﻑ ﺃﻥ ﲣﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺎﺕ؛ ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﺘﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﳌﻮﺍ ّﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﻞ ﺭﺑّﻤﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻫﻮ ﳚﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻔﻮﻳّﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺃﺩﱏ‪.‬‬

‫ﻭﰲ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺍﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻗﺪ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻳﻖ‪ ،‬ﻭﻻ ﺩﺭﺍﺳﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺗﻐﻔﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺮﻳّﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺃﻋﻄﺎﻧﺎﻫﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺮﻧﺎ ﻧﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻵﻥ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺍﻻﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼّﻔﺮ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﺮﺏ ﺻﻔﺤﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺍﻟﻨّﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﳌﺎﻗﺒﻞ ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟﻴّﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛ ﹼﻞ‬
‫ﺷﻲﺀ ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺭﺅﻳﺔ ﺣﺪﺳﻴّﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟِﺒ ْﻨَﻴ ِﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻀﻊ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻮﻳﺺ ﰲ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﳌﺎ ّﺩﻳّﺔ ) ﻟﻮﺣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ‬
‫ﻓﻮﺗﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ( .‬ﻭ َﺣ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ﺺ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻠﻴﺺ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ ﺍﻟﺸّﻨﻴﻊ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺩﺃﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻌﻠﻪ‬
‫ﺨ ﱢﻠ َ‬
‫ﺣﺘّﻰ ﻧُ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻼﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭِﺑﹶﺄ َﺧ َﺮ ٍﺓ ﻭﻻ ﺳﻴّﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻔﺤﺺ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﻮﱃ ﺍﳋﺎﺻّﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻨﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﺴﻰ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﺃﺛﻨﺎﺀ ﻣﺴﻌﺎﻧﺎ‪ ،‬ﳓﻦ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻐﺎﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻭﺳ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻱ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺒﺪﺃ ﺑﺎﻟﻮﺻﻒ‪ :‬ﻓﺎﻟﺴّﺒﻴﻞ‬
‫ﻟﻨﻠﺠﺄ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺮﻕ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺋﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ َﺣ ِﺮ ﱞ‬
‫ُﺣ ﱞﺮ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻓﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ ) ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺮﻑ ﻋﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﺮّﺏ(‬

‫ﺤ ِﺪﺛﹸﻪُ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ‬


‫ﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﺍﻩ ﻭﻳُ ْ‬
‫)‪ (1‬ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﹶﳌ ْﻮ ِﻗ ِ‬
‫ﻱ ﺃﻱ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻗﻒ‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌ ّﻲ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻬﺑﺎ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴّﺔ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺋ ّﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟﻜﻴﻤﻴﺎﺋﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪143‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪﻳّﺔ ﺑﺎﻹﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻣﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﺮّﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺭﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺸّﺎﺭﻉ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ُﺗ َﻌ ﱡﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ‬
‫ﻱ‪ ).‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪(.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩ ّ‬

‫ﻱ ﻻ ﳝﻜﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﲑ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻴّﺎ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺳ ّﻲ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ‬


‫)‪ (2‬ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺧﱪ ّ‬
‫ﲟﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺣﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﺘﻤﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ‪ .‬ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺰﻳﺎﺀ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻠﻐﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ‬
‫ﺻﺔ ﻣﻊ ﻏﺎﻟﻴﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮّﺓ ﻭﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ‪ ،‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺗﻌﻴّﻨﺖ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﹼﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺑﻜﻮﻬﻧﺎ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻜﻼﺳﻴﻜﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﲞﺎ ّ‬
‫ﳑﺘﺪّﺍ‪Res extensa.‬‬

‫)‪ (3‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﲢﻠﻴﻠﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻨّﺘﺎﺋﺞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺓ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮّﺓ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪّﻣﺎﺕ ﺃﻭﺍﳌﺒﺎﺩﺉ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (4‬ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﺎﺯ ﺗﺴﻤﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘّﺠﺮﺑﺔ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘّﺔ ﻛﺴﺎﺋﺮ ﺍﻟﺘّﺠﺎﺭﺏ‪ ،‬ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ‬
‫ﺃﺛﺒﺖ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﻻ ﻳﻘﺘﺼﺮ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺍﶈﺴﻮﺳﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺑﻞ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺿﺮﺏ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﺱ ﻏﻔﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻼﺳﻔﺔ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻘﻮﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳌﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﻣﻴّﺎﺕ‪ ).‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﺍﻷﲝﺎﺙ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﺲ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ‪(.‬‬
‫ﺍﳌﺒﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺩﺱ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﳊ ّ‬

‫)‪ (5‬ﺃﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﺔ‪Les Temps modernes‬؛ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﺔ‬


‫ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺔ‪(.‬‬

‫ﺻ ﹶﺔ ﹸﻇﻬُﻮ ِﺭ ِﻩ ‪Son‬‬
‫)‪ (6‬ﺃﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﺑﻠﻐﺔ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻧﻮﺍﻣ ّﻲ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺧَﺎ ﱠ‬
‫‪caractère d'apparaitre‬ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﻨﻮّﺍﻣﻲ‬
‫ﰐ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﺩّﺓ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‬
‫ﻱ ﺫﺍ ﹼ‬
‫ﺍﳌﺮﻛﹼﺐ‪ ، Composé‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺎ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﻄﻰ ﻧﻮّﺍﺯ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﺘّﺨﻴّﻠﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻭﺧﺎﺻّﺘﻪ‪ ) .‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺚ‪(.‬‬

‫ﱐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﺮﺱ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ‪.‬‬


‫)‪ (7‬ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺋﻦ ﺧﺮﺍﰲ ﻳﻮﻧﺎ ﹼ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪144‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫)‪ (8‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﳏﺘﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﺣﺴّﻴﺔ ﺫﺍﺗﻴّﺔ ﺗَُﺘ َﻤﱠﺜﻞﹸ ﺃﻭّﻻ‪ ،‬ﹼﰒ ﻳﻔﻬﻤﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﹼﻫﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧّﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻭﻋﻼﻣﺔ‬
‫ﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻏﲑ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻌﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻵﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺴّﺎﺑﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻀﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ‪.‬‬

‫ﱄ‪.‬‬
‫)‪ (9‬ﺍﻻﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻱّ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻖُ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣَُﺘ َﻌ ﱠﻠﻖُ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﺎ ﹼ‬
‫ﱯ ﻭﻭﺭﻗﻲّ‪ ،‬ﻣﻄﻠ ّﻲ ﲟﻮﺍ ّﺩ ﺳﻮﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﺧﻀﺮﺍﺀ‪ ،‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﺎ‬
‫ﺇﻧّﻪ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺷﻲﺀ ﺧﺸ ّ‬
‫ﺇﻥ ﻳﻘﻒ ﺍﳌﺮﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ ﻣﻮﻗﻔﺎ ﲨﺎﻟﻴّﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺣﻴﻨﺌﺬ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ ﲟﺎ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻛﺬﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﹼﻮﺣﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺭﺱ ﻭﺍﳌﻮﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﺸّﻴﻄﺎﻥ‪.‬‬

‫ﻱ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻥ ﺗُ َﻌ ﱠﻠ َﻖ ﻓﻌﻠﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ُﻳ ْﻌﻄِﻲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻭﺿﻌﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺭﻓﻌﻪ ﻟﻘﻴﻤﺔ‬


‫ﺤﱢﻴ ِﺪ ّ‬
‫)‪ (10‬ﺍﻟﺘّﻐﻴﲑ ﺍ ﹸﳌ َ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪ ) .‬ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻧﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﻟﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﹼﺎﻟﺜﺔ‪(.‬‬

‫)‪ (11‬ﺃﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﺻﻴّﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻌﻞ‪.‬‬


‫)‪ (12‬ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻻﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﺗﻨﺒﲏ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﺇﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴّﺔ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (13‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳉﺰﺀ ﺍﳌﺎﺩّﻱ ﻟﻠﻔﻌﻞ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ‪.‬‬

‫)‪ (14‬ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﺎ ﳚﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧُ ْﺪ ِﺭﻙُ ﺇﺩﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﺃﻭّﻟﻴّﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴّﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﰲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻣﻜﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﻨّﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻛ ّﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳋﺰﻝ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻧﱰﻉ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻳّﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ‬
‫ﻱ ﺗﺄﺛﲑ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺱ ﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‬
‫َﻣ ْﻌَﻨَﻴ ْﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺼﺪﻳّﺘﲔ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ِﺇﺫﹰﺍ ﻟﻠﻤﺎﺩّﺓ ﺃ ّ‬
‫ﻭﺃﻳﺪﻭﺱ ﺍﻹﺩﺭﺍﻙ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻟﻦ ﻳﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻨﺮﻯ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺳﻄﺮ‪.‬‬

‫ﻥ‬ ‫‪Jahrbuc‬‬ ‫‪fur‬‬ ‫‪Philosophie‬‬ ‫‪und‬‬ ‫ﺃ‪ph‬‬


‫‪nomenologische Forschung/ bd. I.‬‬
‫‪IDEENN ZU EINER‬‬ ‫ﺏ ‪REINEN PHAENOMENOLOGIE‬‬
‫‪UND PHAENOMENOLOGISCHEN PHILOSOPHIE.‬‬
‫ﺕ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٥٣ .‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪145‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺙ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪. ٦٥‬‬
‫ﺝ( ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺳ ّﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻌﲎ " ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﻴﺔ "‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﺮّﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻲ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺃﻳﺪﻭﺳﻴّﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺡ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪. ١٣٢ .‬‬
‫ﺥ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٢٠ .‬‬
‫ﺩ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ ‪ ،٦٤‬ﺃﺭﻟﺒﻴﻨﻴﺲ‪ ، Erlebnis‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﳝﺘﻨﻊ ﻧﻘﻠﻬﺎ ﻟﻠﻔﺮﻧﺴﻴّﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺸﺘﻘﹼﺔ ﻣﻦ‬
‫"‪ erleben‬ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ " ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﻴﺶ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻣﺎ "‪.‬‬ ‫ﻓﻌﻞ ﺃﺭﻟﻴﱭ "‪Etwas erleben‬‬
‫ﻓﺄﺭﻟﻴﺒﻨﺲ‪ ،‬ﻳﻘﺮﺏ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﲎ " ﺍﳌﻌﻴﺶ " ﻟﺪﻯ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﺟﺴﻮﻧﻴّﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺫ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٧٦ .‬‬
‫‪tteabschattung,‬ﻭﻏﲑ‬ ‫ﺭ‪) Farbenabschattung, Gl‬ﻥ‬
‫ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ...‬ﲤﺘﻨﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﻞ‪.‬‬
‫ﺯ(ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٧٥ .‬‬
‫ﺱ ‪ ،) " beseelen ",‬ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ(‬
‫ﺵ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ .٤٣ ،‬ﺍﻹﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻧﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ﺹ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.٢٢٦ .‬‬
‫ﺽ( ﻭﻫﻲ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﺔ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ‪ ،‬ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ ،‬ﻗﺪ ﺑﻠﻎ ﻬﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻳﺔ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﻤﺎﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻁ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺒﻴّﻦ ﲞﺎﺻّﺔ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻣّﻞ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﱄﹼ‪ ،‬ﺍﳌﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻻﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮﺩ‪.‬‬
‫ﻓﻮﺻﻔﺎﺗﻪ ﺗﺴﺘﻠﻬﻢ ﲝ ّﻖ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻅ( ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳊﺮﺏ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﻳﺄﺧﺬ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺴﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﻄﻮ ّﺭ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺃﳒﺰﻩ ﻫﻮﺳّﺮﻝ ﻣﻨﺬ ﺍﻟﻄﹼﺒﻌﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻭﱃ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ‪.‬‬
‫ﻉ( ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻳّﺔ ﺣﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮّﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺳﻨﻠﺘﻤﺲ ﺩﺣﻀﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ‪ ،‬ﻟﻪ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻛﺒﲑ ﰲ ﺃﻥ ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫‪.‬‬ ‫ﺴ ّﻲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮ‬
‫ﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻧ ّ‬
‫ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻏﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣﺔ‪ ،‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻷﳒﻠﻴﺰ ّ‬
‫ﻍ( ﳓﻦ ﻧﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺣ ّﻖ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﹼﻖ ﻫﺎﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺘﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺗﺒﻴﺤﻪ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﺼﻮﺹ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﺐ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻘﺒﻞ ﺑﻪ‪ .‬ﻓﻬﻲ ﻧﺼﻮﺹ ﺫﺍﺕ ﹶﻟ ْﺒﺲٍ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺘﻀﻲ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ‪ ،‬ﺃﻥ ﻧﻌﺘﻨﻖ ﺭﺃﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ‬
‫ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻨﺎﻕ ﻭﺑﻴّﻨﻪ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪146‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺞ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺎﺟﺔ‪ ،‬ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺟ ّﺪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ‪ ،‬ﺩﻗﺎﺋﻘﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻌﻨﻴﻨﺎ‬
‫ﻕ( ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻰﳓﻮ ﹶﻓ ﱟ‬
‫ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻷﻭّﻝ‪.‬‬
‫ﻙ( ﺍﻷﻓﻜﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.١٨٤ .‬‬
‫ﻝ( ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺟﻊ‪ ،‬ﺹ‪.١٨٨ .‬‬
‫ﻡ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ُﺭ ْﻣﻨَﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻠﻒ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺼﻞ‪.‬‬

‫ﺧﺎﲤﺔ‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪147‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛ ﹼﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺔ ﻓﻬﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﳍﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺔ‪ .‬ﺫﻟﻚ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻫﻮ‬
‫ﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﳍﻮ ﻳﺘﻼﺀﻡ‬
‫ﺍﳉﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺍﺗّﻔﻖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻭﻥ ﲨﻴﻌﻬﻢ‪ .‬ﻭﻏﲑ ﺷ ّ‬
‫ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﺘّﻼﺅﻡ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻟ ّﺮﻭّﻳﺔ‪ .‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺄﻩ‪ ،‬ﻫﻮ ﻟﻌﻤﺮﻱ‪ ،‬ﻣﻦ ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻠﻴّﺔ‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻪ ﻳﺘﻼﺀﻡ‬
‫ﺲ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﲏّ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻜﻨّﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻳﺘﺄﺗّﻰ ﻣﻨﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ‬
‫ﻣﻊ ﻣﻌﻄﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﳊ ّ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺎ ﲜﻬﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﺮّﻳﺎﺿﻴّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻣﻮﺍ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻴﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﳌﺘّﺼﻞ ﺑﺘﻮﺳّﻂ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ‬
‫ﺐ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺴ ّﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﺀ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻳﻌﻄﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﺎﻗﺒﻠ ّﻲ‬
‫ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻠﺔ‪ :‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ِﺭ َﱘ ﺃﻥ ُﻧﺼِﻴ َ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﳌﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﳌﻴﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻘﻴّﺔ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘﻴّﺔ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﻨﺎﺻﺮ)ﺃ(‪ :‬ﺇﻧّﻬﺎ ُﺗ َﻌ ﱡﺪ ﰲ‬
‫ﺭﺃﻳﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﺸﻞ ﺍﻷ ﹼﰎ ﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﻨّﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔ ّﻲ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻘﺪ ﺭﻣﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﻠﻴّﻨﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻥ ﳒﻌﻠﻬﺎ ﳓﻴﻠﺔ ﻭﺃﻥ ﳒﻌﻠﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻼ ﺗﻌﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﹼﻖ‪ .‬ﻭﳌﹼﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻔﲔ‬
‫ﺫﺍﺕ ﺇﻬﺑﺎﻡ ﻭﺫﺍﺕ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴّﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻣﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﻟﺌ ﹼ‬
‫ﺕ ﻣُ ﹶﻘﱠﻨ َﻌ ﹰﺔ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﻨّﺤﻮ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺗﻘﻄﻊ ﺗﻮﺍﺻﻠﻴّﺔ ﺗﻴّﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪،‬‬
‫ﻗﺪ ﺗﺒﻴّﻦ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻭُ ِﺟ َﺪ ْ‬
‫ﻓﺈﻧّﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﻓﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻻﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﻋﺪّﻭﻫﺎ ﺑﻨﺤﻮ ﳎﺮّﺩ ﻛﺎﺋﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﺳ ّﻲ)‪ .(١‬ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃﻧّﻬﻢ ﱂ‬
‫ﻳﻜﻮﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺒﻬﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﻬﺗﻢ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺗﻨﺎﻝ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺴﱢﻴﹶﺌ ﹸﺔ ﻛﻠﹼﻬﺎ ﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻧّﻨﺎ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻗﺪ ﺫﻫﺒﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻓﻜﺮﺓ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪،‬‬
‫ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻬﺎ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟ ﱠ‬
‫ﺽ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺴﺘﺨﻠﺺ ﺗﺼﻮّﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ َﺗ َﺮﻭﱢﻳﻨَﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﻨّﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺴّﺆﺍﻝ‬
‫ِﻋ َﻮ َ‬
‫ﺍﻵﰐ ‪ :‬ﻛﻴﻒ ﳝﻜﻦ ﻟﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﺃﻥ ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ ـ ﻭﱂ ﻧﺘﺒﻴّﻦ ﺃﻧّﻪ ﰲ‬
‫ﺷﻜﻞ ﺻﻮﻏﻨﺎ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﺄﻟﺔ ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺘّﺼﻮّﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﺭّﻱ ﻟﻠﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻮﻳﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﳊﻖّ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ‬
‫ﺖ ُﺗ ُﻌ ﱡﺪ ﳏﺘﻮﻯ ﻧﻔﺴﻴّﺎ ﻋﺎﻃﻼ‪ ،‬ﻓﻼ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﲝﺎﻝ ﺃﻥ‬
‫ﺃﻥ ﳒﻴﺐ ﺑﻮﺿﻮﺡ‪ :‬ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻣﺎ َﺑ ِﻘَﻴ ْ‬
‫ﲡﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﻊ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳّﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﻟﻴﻒ‪ .‬ﻭﻻ ﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺗﻴّﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﺃﻥ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻲ‬
‫ﻧﻔﺴﻬﺎ ﺗﺄﻟﻴﻔﺎ ﻻ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍ‪ .‬ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺑَﺎ ِﻃ َﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺄﻧﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ‬
‫ﺻﻮﺭ‪ .‬ﻭﺇﻧّﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﳕﻂ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻋﻲ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻫﻲ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ‪ .‬ﻭﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻫﻲ ﻭﻋﻲ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﻣﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪148‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﺃﲝﺜﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﻨّﻘﺪﻳّﺔ ﻻﳝﻜﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺄﺧﺬﻧﺎ ﺃﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ‪ .‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻮﺻﻒ‬
‫ﺍﻟﻔﻴﻨﻮﻣﻴﻨﻮﻟﻮﺟ ّﻲ ﻟﺒﻨﻴﺔ " ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ "‪ .‬ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﻑ ﻧﻠﺘﻤﺴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻒ ﺁﺧﺮ)‪(٢‬‬

‫) ﺍﳌﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﹼﱵ ﻗﺒﻠﻬﺎ ﺃﺣﺮﻑ ﻋﺮﺑﻴّﺔ ﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺻﻨﻊ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ ﻻ ﺍﳌﻌﺮّﺏ(‬ ‫ﺍﻟﺘّﻌﺎﻟﻴﻖ‬

‫)‪ (1‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺔ ﺍﻟﺘّﺤﻘﲑ‪ ،‬ﻭﻛﺄﻧّﻬﻢ ﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﺑﺄﻧّﻪ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘ ّﻲ ﳍﺎ‪.‬‬
‫)‪ (2‬ﻭﻟﻘﺪ ﺃﳒﺰ ﺳﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳّﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘّﺄﺳﻴﺴﻴّﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼّﻮﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﳋﻴﺎﻝ‪ ،‬ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨّﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﹼﺬﻱ ﺗﻼ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺼﻨّﻒ‪ ،‬ﰲ‬
‫ﱄ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﳋﻴﺎ ﹼ‬

‫ﺴﻴّﺪ ﺑﻮﺭﻟﻮﺩ ‪ M. Burloud‬ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻭﺍﻁ‪،‬‬


‫ﺍﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻼﺹ ﺍﻟ ّ‬ ‫ﺃ(‬
‫ﻭﻣﺴّﺮ ﻭﺑﻮﻫﻠﺮ ‪La pensée d'après watt, Messer‬‬
‫‪et Bûhler‬ﻓﻼ ﺑ ّﺪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﳕﻴّﺰ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﻨﲔ ‪ :‬ﺑﻨﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﳏﺘﻮﺍﻩ‪ .‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻪ‬
‫ﺴﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻋﻼﻗﻴّﺔ ﺃﻭ ﻛﻼﳘﺎ ﺍﻹﺛﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﻌﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺓ‪ .‬ﺃﻣّﺎ ﰲ‬
‫ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺣ ّ‬
‫ﺑﻨﻴﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺸﻲﺀ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﳓﻮ َﺗَﺒﱡﻴِﻨﻨَﺎ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﶈﺘﻮﻯ‪ ،".‬ﺹ‪.١٧٤ .‬‬

‫ﺘ ّﻡ ﺘﻌﺭﻴﺏ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﹼﻌﻠﻴﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺭﺒﻴﻊ ‪ ٢٠٠١‬ﺒﻁﺒﻠﺒﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻟﻭﺍﻫﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﻘل ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺩ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﻨﹼﺔ‪.‬‬

‫رأي اﻟﻘﺎرئ وﺳﺆاﻟﻪ‬

‫ﻟﻄﻔﻲ ﺧﻴﺮاﷲ‬
‫ﺗﻮﻧﺲ‬
‫ﺗﺎرﻱﺦ اﻟﻤﻴﻼد ‪ ١٩٦٥/٠٢/٢١‬ﺑﻄﺒﻠﺒﺔ‬
‫ﺑﺎﺣﺚ ﻓﻲ اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔﺔ‬
‫اﻟﺒﺮﻱﺪ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻲ ‪kirallalotfi@yahoo.fr‬‬
‫ﻋﻨﻮان ﻡﻮﻗﻊ اﻟﻤﻌﺮّب‪Membres.lycos.fr/philosophie15 :‬‬

‫ﻣﻊ ﲢﻴﺎﺕ ‪ :‬ﺍﳌﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﺔ ﺍﺠﻤﻟﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫‪www.fiseb.cm‬‬

‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪149‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬


‫‪www.fiseb.com‬‬ ‫‪150‬‬ ‫اﻟﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ اﻻﻟﻜﺘﺮوﻧﻴﺔ اﻟﻤﺠﺎﻧﻴﺔ‬

You might also like