GEC Brazil 0
GEC Brazil 0
GEC Brazil 0
www.greeneconomycoalition.org
Results so far
At the present moment (March, 2011), the Brazilian GE National Dialogue is entering its second phase, building on the support of a very relevant audience, well articulated with the other main movements in the country aiming to Rio+20, and with strong plans to become an active participant in the official Brazilian preparatory process to UNCSD 2012. In addition, the process of building the Brazilian Essential Agenda for the Green Economy is up and running, based on the results of the first phase of the initiative: the Brazilian Green Economy Framework (BGEF) and an active network of participants and supporters. The BGEF comprises six topics: terminology, general concept, principles/practical concepts, perspectives, themes and priorities. Together, these topics will be used to frame and assess the concrete proposals to be developed/ identified at regional and thematic seminars, providing some level of consistency and coherence in the outputs from these semi-autonomous discussions. Results will provide material to be developed at the 2nd National Seminar on Green Economy, which will distill the Brazilian GE Essential Agenda, featuring a relatively small number of key measures needed to foster GE in Brazil, firmly anchored in the broad discussions held throughout the process. This Essential Agenda is intended to provide the basis for advocacy by many different sectors, since it should focus on very relevant enablers and promoters of the transition to GE in Brazil, with immediate applicability. The general concept presented in the BGEF is as follows: A Green Economy is an Economy which results in improved human well-being and social equity, while creating value for Nature, significantly reducing social/environmental risks and impacts, and demand for ecosystems and scarce social resources. A GE is characterised by focusing investments in activities that,
UNCSD 2012
MARCH 2011
www.greeneconomycoalition.org
aiming at such results, use and make the most of natural, social and human capitals, taking into account in its decisions the limits of the planet and the sustainable interests of society.
3 To avoid privileging development based on economic growth at any cost, anchored in big infrastructure investments and massive consumption, rather than innovative strategies to leapfrog the 20th century, which should receive support. At the same time, to strengthen the institutional framework and public policies aligned with sustainability, which are still seen as too fragile and poorly articulated. 4 To promote alternatives to consumerism and the consumer society, by fostering the Sustainable Consumption and Production Plan (part of the Marrakech Process), as well as by privileging education and cultural and social initiatives reframing the broad societal aspirations and understanding of what constitutes a good life. 5 To use existing economic instruments (and to develop new ones as appropriate), so as to provide incentives to move towards GE and to dis-incentivise activities that will move the country in the opposite direction. This may include taxation policies, financing and investment mechanisms, green public procurement, valuation of public goods and assets, and charging for externalities. 6 To promote the quick and appropriate adoption of the recently approved National Policy for Solid Wastes. To fight against weakening the National Forestry Code. 7 To promote the creation of mechanisms to generate payments for environmental services, recognition of the importance of natural and protected areas, for example through tourism, sustainable use of natural areas, and valuing of biodiversity assets. 8 To foster the transition to a GE will require not only economic mechanisms, but also investment in strengthening society through education, promotion of transparency, citizenship and participation, civil society organisation, and a range of other means. 9 To protect grassroots producers and create employment
www.greeneconomycoalition.org
MARCH 2011
and wealth, by providing technical and institutional support to traditional communities, small farmers, entrepreneurs and others. Although financial and market mechanisms can and should be used as tools to generate compensation for those kinds of goods and services, this shouldnt reduce them to merely commodities. For instance, paying for the services provided by a forest doesnt mean that the forest itself should be bought and sold as if it were just merchandise. 10 To denounce and prevent any misuse or misrepresentation of the Green Economy and related concepts/practices, avoiding the erosion of the proposals they represent, as well as the growth of skepticism in society.
Next steps
The Brazilian GE National Dialogue will organise a number of regional, thematic and other focused consultations between April and September, so as to realise its 2nd National Seminar and publication of the Brazilian GE Essential Agenda in October. This will allow it to become a significant input to the 2nd Intersessional meeting of the UN official preparatory process to UNCSD 2012. The Brazilian NDs methodology and results are available to everyone planning to contribute to the transition to a green economy. We are happy to share them and provide further information and answers. For more information contact Aron Belinky, International Processes Coordinator, Vitae Civilis Institute - Brazil: aron@grupocasa.com.br
Institute for
www.greeneconomycoalition.org
MARCH 2011