The document provides an evaluation of an online hybrid lesson on 3-digit addition with regrouping in the ones place. The evaluator found that the lesson's goals and objectives were clearly stated and aligned to standards. Content was presented in an organized manner and related to the objectives. However, the evaluator suggested adding a summative assessment, clarifying how student work will be scored, and ensuring technology requirements are clear. Overall, the lesson was found to be good but some minor improvements were recommended.
The document provides an evaluation of an online hybrid lesson on 3-digit addition with regrouping in the ones place. The evaluator found that the lesson's goals and objectives were clearly stated and aligned to standards. Content was presented in an organized manner and related to the objectives. However, the evaluator suggested adding a summative assessment, clarifying how student work will be scored, and ensuring technology requirements are clear. Overall, the lesson was found to be good but some minor improvements were recommended.
The document provides an evaluation of an online hybrid lesson on 3-digit addition with regrouping in the ones place. The evaluator found that the lesson's goals and objectives were clearly stated and aligned to standards. Content was presented in an organized manner and related to the objectives. However, the evaluator suggested adding a summative assessment, clarifying how student work will be scored, and ensuring technology requirements are clear. Overall, the lesson was found to be good but some minor improvements were recommended.
The document provides an evaluation of an online hybrid lesson on 3-digit addition with regrouping in the ones place. The evaluator found that the lesson's goals and objectives were clearly stated and aligned to standards. Content was presented in an organized manner and related to the objectives. However, the evaluator suggested adding a summative assessment, clarifying how student work will be scored, and ensuring technology requirements are clear. Overall, the lesson was found to be good but some minor improvements were recommended.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 8
1
Online Course Evaluation Tool
General Information
Course/Unit/Lesson Title
Reviewer
3-Digit Addition with Regrouping in the
Ones Place
Christy Brock
URL (if available)
Review Date
http://zunal.com/webquest.php? w=314988
3/20/2016
Course/Unit/Lesson Creator
Course Type (synchronous,
asynchronous, online, hybrid)
Patricia Pearce
Hybrid
Does
Criteria
Meets
Partiall
Not
Criteri
y Meets
Meet
Criteria
Criteri a
Standards and Objectives
1. Goals and objectives are clearly stated and easy to understand. 2. Goals and objectives promote higher order thinking skills. 1 3. Objectives are aligned to state or national standards. 1 4. Goals and objectives are attainable. 1 5. A sufficient amount of resources and materials are provided for students to meet goals and objectives. 1 Additional Comments:
1. All instructions are presented in a clear, organized manner. 2. Bulleted lists and steps written in sequential order are used to present information to students. 3. All subtopics of a course/unit/lesson are related to the main topic. 4. There is evidence that backward design was used when planning lesson(s). Additional Comments:
x x
x x
Does
Criteria
Meets
Partiall
Not
Criteri
y Meets
Meet
Criteria
Criteri
N/A
Course Content and Design
1. Content is presented in an organized manner and sequential order. 2 2. Content is directly related to learning objectives. 3
3. Content is appropriate to the age of the x 3 learners and their level of experience. 4. Content is current, accurate, and relevant to x 3 the topic. 5. Academic integrity, plagiarism, netiquette, x and expectations regarding appropriate communication are clearly defined. 3 6. Design reflects understanding of student x needs (i.e. courses/units/lessons meant for young or lower functioning students provide more scaffolding or chunking in order to make goals attainable). 3 7. Content can be accessed across multiple x devices. 8. Design and content are meant to address a x number of student learning styles. 3 9. Students are involved in active learning. 3 x 10. Learning activities can be adapted to meet x 3 student needs. 11. Learning activities include cooperative x learning in addition to independent tasks. 12. All assignments are directly related to x material taught within the course/unit/lesson. 4 13. Models are provided to students. x Additional Comments: Are your students able to read the content in your webquest? Or will you read it to them as they go? Is there a way to add voice to a Zunal? Does
Criteria
Meets
Partiall
Not
Criteri
y Meets
Meet
Criteria
Criteri
N/A
Assessment 1. Multiple forms of assessment are utilized (both formative and summative). 2. Grading rubrics are provided to students in advance of assignment due dates. 3. Students are given a choice of multiple formats for assignment/assessment completion (when applicable) in order to align with their personal learning styles. 4. Assessment is ongoing and utilized to verify student readiness. 1
5. Grading policies are clear. 1 x 6. All instructions are clear. x 7. Assessments are directly related to material x taught in course/unit/lesson. 4 Additional Comments: How will you score your students on the work they turn in? Maybe you can add a summative assessment that your students can complete to show what they have learned, or you can tell them on your evaluation page what they will be doing at a later date to show what they have learned for a grade. Just a suggestion.
Does
Criteria
Meets
Partiall
Not
Criteri
y Meets
Meet
Criteria
Criteri
N/A
Communication 1. Information is provided to students about how to contact/communicate with the instructor. 1 2. Multiple forms of communication (i.e. chat, text, forum, phone call, etc.) are made available to the student. 3. Instructor builds community by providing a place for student profiles, announcements, personal anecdotes, etc. 4. Participation is encouraged through the use of guiding questions. Additional Comments:
x x
Additional online communication is not needed in this lesson, as your students are too young to contact you on their own. Plus, it is a hybrid lesson, so you are available to help students as needed.
Criteria
Meets
Partiall
Does
Criteri
y Meets
Not
Criteria
Meet Criteri
N/A
Online Course Evaluation Tool
a
Feedback 1. Specific feedback is provided on assignments x so that improvement can be made. 2. Feedback is provided in a timely manner. x 3. Students are given the opportunity to provide x constructive feedback to peers. 4. Feedback remains positive and is in the x interest of improving skills and understanding. Additional Comments: It seems as though you will provide feedback to your students face-to-face as opposed to online, which makes sense due to their age. Based on the tone of your writing, I can tell that you are giving your students positive feedback. You have also given your students a chance to share feedback with each other through face-to-face discussion.
Does
Criteria
Meets
Partiall
Not
Criteri
y Meets
Meet
Criteria
Criteri
N/A
Educational Support 1. A syllabus is objectives requirements provided and includes: 1 learning outcomes expectations assignments grading policy instructor availability 2. All additional resources (i.e. text, video, weblinks, etc.) are easily located. Additional Comments:
Criteria
x x x x x x x x x
Meets
Partiall
Does
N/A
Online Course Evaluation Tool
Not Criteri
y Meets
Meet
Criteria
Criteri a
Technology and Technology Support
1. Course/Unit/Lesson is easily navigated and intuitive for the learner. 2. Technology requirements are clear. 1 3. Technology is appropriate to the level of the students. 4. Design principles are used when considering font, color scheme, and graphics. 5. Technology is used to facilitate interaction with classmates and instructor, and provides opportunity for student input. 4 6. Weblinks are checked regularly to ensure usability. 7. Technology assistance is available to the student. 2 Additional Comments:
x x x x x
x x
Open Ended Course/Unit/Lesson Strengths: You have a good lesson. I think your kids will enjoy it. Congratulations to you for having such a young class and exposing them to their 2 nd webquest already! There were just a few areas that I thought maybe you could add a few things. (see notes above under specific criteria).
Areas in Need of Improvement:
(see notes above under specific criteria).
Online Course Evaluation Tool
References
Course Evaluation Questions: Online Courses. (2011, Oct 7). Retrieved from http://www.jmu.edu/coe/ncate2012/standard5/wm_library/Exh53F_Course_Eva luation_Forms_Online_courses.pdf Berkeley Center for Teaching and Learning. (n. d.). Course evaluations question bank. Retrieved from https://teaching.berkeley.edu/course-evaluationsquestion-bank Southern Regional Education Board. (2006). Checklist for evaluating online courses. Retrieved from
Online Course Evaluation Tool
http://publications.sreb.org/2006/06T06_Checklist_for_Evaluating-OnlineCourses.pdf Wright, C. (n. d.). Criteria for evaluating the quality of online courses. Retrieved from http://elearning.typepad.com/thelearnedman/ID/evaluatingcourses.pdf
