Soil Strength
Soil Strength
Soil Strength
JNI'SNOS
ry AA'IL{\ NHOI
AAlMN
//?-\
rx\)
Y-/
1t731"r6'guaqdalE
uq)unclpowlw 'f
,{4gqu1sedols
puB rll8uerls IIos
CHAPTER3
For slope stability analysesto be useful, they must represent the correct problem, correctly' .fttrmuLoted.This
requires(l) mastery of the principles of soil mechanLcs.(2) knowledge of geology and site conditions. and
-31knowledge of the propertiesof the soils at the site.
In thrs chapter we deal with the principles of soil meihanics that are needed to understand and to fbrmulate
.inalysesof slope stability problems correctly.
l9
20
sotl
MECHANICs PRTNCTPLES
Metalplate
Porousstone
Normal load P
Shearbox
Shear loadT
F'igure3.1
D)
t,,,,: 4 -
(1,,
( - 1I.)
where /,,.,is the time required for 994/r,of the equilibrium volume change,D the greatestdistancethat water
must travel to flow out of the soil mass (length units),
and r:,.the coefhcient of consolidation(length squared
p e r u n i t o f t i m e ) . F o r t h e t e s t s p e c i m e ni n F i g u r e 3 . 1 ,
D w o u l d b e h a l f t h e s p e c i m e nt h i c k n e s sa. b o u t 1 . 0c m ,
and c,,would be about 2 cm)/h ( l9 ft':lyr). Using these
numbers. we would estimate that /,,.,would be 2.0 h.
One second after the new loads were applied, the test
specimenwould be undrained.Afier 2 hours or longer,
the test specimenwould be drained.
Parenthetically,it should be noted that the use of
the direct shear test as an example of drained and undrained conditions is not meant to indicate that the
direct shear apparatus is suitable fbr both drained and
Recapitulation
. The difl'erencebetweenundrainedand drained
conditionsis time.
. Undrainedsignifiesa conditionwherechangesin
loadsoccur more rapidly than watercan flow in
increaseor
or out of the soil. The pore pressures
to the changesin loads.
decrease
in response
. Drained signifiesa conditionwhere changesin
load are slow enough,or remain in place long
enough,so that wateris ableto flow in or out of
the soil, permittingthe soil to reach a stateof
equilibriurnwith regard to water flow. The pore
pressures
in the drainedconditionare controlled
by the hydraulicboundaryconditions,andareunaffectedby the changesin loads.
21
W+P
(.3.2)
*': #.,,*l\:
1 . 2k P a
(3.3)
200N :
19.4kPa
0 . 0 1 0m
3,
The valuesof total stressare definedwithout ref'erence to how much of the fbrce might be carried by
contactsbetweenparticlesor to how much is transmitted throughwaterpressure.Total stressis the same
fbr the undrainedand drainedconditions.The valueof
total stressdependsonly on equilibrium;it is equal to
the total of all normal forcesdivided by the total area.
When the load P is appliedrapidly and the specimen
The specimen
is undrained,
the porepressure
changes.
is confined within the shearbox and cannot defbrm.
The clay is saturated(the voids are lilled rvith water),
so the volume of the specimencannotchangeuntil
water flows out. In this condition. the addedload is
The soil
carriedentirelyby increasedwater pressure.
skeleton(the assemblageof particlesin contact with
one another)does not changeshape,does not change
volume,and carriesnone of the new appliedload.
Under theseconditionsthe increasein water pressureis equal to the changein total stress:
L , u: L , o : 1 9 . 4k P a
(3.5)
(3.8)
(3.e)
(3.6)
1 9 . 9k P a : 0 . 7 k P a
(3.10)
22
r-i
( 3 .I 2 )
The shear strength of soils is controlled by effective stress.whether tailure occurs under drained or unilrained conditions. The relationship between shear
strength and eflective stress can be represented by a
Mohr-Coulomb strengthenvelope,as shown in Figure
3.2. The relationshipbetween r and o' shown in Figure
3.2 can be expressedas
r' : c' + ,rLtan(b'
(3.13)
where c'' is the efl'ective stress cohesion. oi, the efl'ective stress on the failure plane at failure, and rf' the
efTectivestressangle of internal friction.
Sources of Shear Strength
I1 a shear load 7 is applied to the test specimenshown
i n F i g u r e 3 . 1 , t h e t o p o f t h e s h e a rb o x w i l l m o v e t o
the lefi relative to the bottom of the box. If the shear
load is large enough, the clay will fail by shearingon
the horizontal plane, and the displacementwould be
very large. Failure would be accompaniedby development of a ruptr-rrezone, or break through the soil,
along the horizontal plane.
As the upper half of the specimenmoved to the lefi
with respect to the lower half and the stren-ethof the
soil was mobilized, the particles within the rupture
zone would be displaced fiom their original positions
relative to adjacentpalticles. lnterparticlebonds would
be broken. some individual particles would be broken'
particles would rotate and be reoriented into new positions" and particles would slide across their contacts
with nei-ehboringparticles. These movements of the
particles would be resistedby the strengthof interparticle bonds, by fiictional resistanceto sliding, and by
fbrces fiom adjacent particles resistin-edisplacement
ancl reorientation. These types of resistanceare the
sourccsof shear strength in soils.
The two most inlportant factors -eoverning the
strengthsof soils are the magnitudeof the interparticle
contact firrces and the density of the soil. Larger interparticle contact fbrces (larger values of efl'ective
stress)and higher densitiesresult in higher stren-eths.
As r increases.the shear displacement(A"r) between
the top and the bottom of the shearbox would increase.
as shown in Ftgure 3.3. This sheardisplacementresults
from shear strains in the rupture zone. The shear displacementsin direct sheartestscan be measuredeasily.
but shear strains cannot be determincd. because the
thickness of the shear zttne is not known. While the
clirect shear tcst can be used to measllre the shear
slrengths of soils. it providcs only qr-ralitativcinlbrrnation about strcss strain bchavior. It is ptlssible tcr
c l e t e r r n i n ew h c t h e r s o i l s a r e d u c t i l e ( s h e a r r e s i s t a n c e
23
F o rp r e s s u r e>sp r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n
p r e s s u r e ,n v e l o peex t e n d b
sack
t h r o u g ho r i g i n( c ' = 0 )
(D
H i g hp r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n
o
(g
q)
c
Effectivestress- o'
la)
E n v e l o p e sa r e s l i g h t l y
c u r v e o ,m o r e s o a t
h i g h e rd e n s i t y
Q loo""
c)
@
$
C)
g
Effectivestress- o'
(b)
Figure3.2 Ellbctive stressshearstrengthenvelopes:(a) for clay; (b) fbr sands,gravels.and
rockfill.
Z slowly so thatexcessporepressures
did not develop.
As shown by Eq. (3.11).the eff'ectivestresson the
horizontalplaneat equilibriumunderthe 200-N load
would be 20.1 kPa. and it would remainconstantas
the clay was shearedslowly.
The strengthof the specimen
canbe calculated
using
Eq. (3.13). If the clay is normally consolidated,
c'
would be zero. The value of rf' would probablybe
between25 and 35" tor normallyconsolidated
sandy
or silty clay. As an example,supposethat @' is equal
to 30". The drainedstrengthof the clay would be
s:
c ' t c i , t a n6 ' : 0
+ ( 2 0 . 1 ) ( 0 . 5 8 )1: 1 . 6k P a
( 3 .1 4 )
24
+l
tll
t<-
Duclile
(."gg'"9
_/ _
/-
a
a
Brittle
(sensitive)
a
(g
q)
-c
- Ax
Horizontaldisplacement
Figure 3.3 Shear stress-sheardisplacementcurvesfor direct
shear test.
+ (8.0X0.58):4.6kpa
(3.1s)
Figure 3.4 shows the stresspaths and shear strengths
lbr drained and undrained failure of the direct shear
test specimen. The drained stress path is vertical, corresponding to an increase in shear stress and constant
:ftective normal stress on the horizontal plane. The
,rndrained stresspath curves to the left, as the increase
in shear stress is accompanied by a decrease in eff-ectire normal stressdue to the increasein pore pressure.
As is typical fbr normally consolidated clays, the
undrained strength is lower than the drained strength.
This is due to the fact that the pore pressure increases
.rnd the effective stress decreases during undrained
.hear. For very heavily overconsolidated clays, the re',erse is true: The undrained strength is greater
than the
,lrained strength, because pore pressure decreasesand
:tfective stress increases during undrained shear.
\trength Envelopes
itrength envelopesfor soils are developed by perfbrmng strength tests on soils using a range of pressures
,,nd plotting the results on a Mohr stressdiagram, as
.jrown in Figure 3.5. Both eff-ectivestress and total
.tfess strength envelopes can be developed. The
.trength envelopesshown in Figure 3.5 are represen.rtlve of the results of tests on undisturbedspecimens
i clay. all trimmed fiom the same undisturbed sample
.nd therefore all having the same preconsolidation
Undrained ,
stresspath-/
10
15
20
Effeclivestress- 6' (kPa)
a
a
E
a
(6
c)
c
Totalstress(undrained)
c'
I
25
.t//
(3.16a'1
(b,,- 0
(3.r6b)
{t :
26
sorl
MECHANICS PRINCTPLES
Effectivestress
(drained
and
Recapitulation
. Sheor strensthis dellned as the maximum shear
stressthat the soil can withstand.
. The strength of soil is controlled by efl-ective
stresses.
whetherfailure occursunderdrainedor
undrainedconditions.
. Drained strengthis the strengthcorespondingto
failure with no changein effective stresson the
tailureplane.
. Undruinedstrengthis the strengthcorresponding
to tailurewith no changein watercontent.
. EfTectivestressstrengthenvelopesrepresentfundamentalbehavior.becausestrengthis controlled
by eftectivestressand density.
. Total stress strength envelopesreflect the pore
pressuresthat developduring undrainedshear,as
well as fundamentalbebaviorin termsof ef-tbctive
SITCSS.
o
o
o
c
a
E f f e c t i v es t r e s so r t o t a ls t r e s s- a ' o r o
21
,D.
t u , , -4 -
(3.11)
L7,
28
sorr- MECHANTcsPRINCTPLES
Short-Term Analyses
Shrtrl ternr ref'ers to conclitions dr-rringrlr lirllowing
construction-thc time irlrnediately fbllowing the
changc in load. For exanrple. if constructins a sand
e r n b a n k n r e not n a c l a v l i r u n d a t i o nt a k e s t w o r r o n t h s ,
the short-terrnconclitionfirr the enrbankntcntwoulcl bc
t h e e n c l o f c o n s t r u c t i o n .r l r t w o l n ( ) n t h s .W i t h i n t l t i s
p c r i o d o l ' l i r n c . i t w o u l d b e a r e a s o n a b l ea p p l o x i n t a t i o n
that no drainage wor-rldoccur in the clay firundation,
whcrcas thc sand crnbankrnentwould bc I'ully clraincd.
F o r t h i s c o n d i t i o n i t w o u l d b c l o g i c a l t o p e r f i r r ma
d r a i n e da n a l v s i so l ' t h e e r n b a n k r n e nat n d a n u n d r a i n e d
D r a i n a g ep a t h l e n g t h- m
10
Years
10,000
1,000
10
f-q2+
'100
Months
10 100
1
3.0
Days
100
"*49
1 0 Ho u r s
100
1
I ^.,iut'
---f-
a$"
Drainagepath length- ft
Figure 3.7 Time required fbr' drainage of' soil deposits {1.,.,based on Terzagh's theory ol'
consolidation).
Failure
Progressive
One of the fundamentalassumptionsof limit equilibrium analysesis that the strengthof the soil can be
mobilized over a wide range of strains,as shown by
the curve labeled"ductile" in Figure 3.3. This implicit
assumptionarisesfrom the fact that limit equilibrium
analysesprovide no information regardingdeformations or strains.
Progressivefailure is a strongpossibilityin the case
of excavatedslopes in overconsolidatedclays and
shales, particularly stifT-fissuredclays and shales.
These materialshave brittle stress-straincharacteristics, and they contain high horizontal stresses,often
higher than the vertical stress.When an excavationis
madein stiff fissuredclay or shale,the excavatedslope
reboundshorizontally,as shown in Figure 3.8. Finite
elementstudiesby Duncanand Dunlop(1969),(1910)
showedthat shearstressesare very high at the toe of
the slope,and there is a tendencyfbr failure to begin
at the toe and progressback beneaththe crest. as
shownin Figure3.8.
Immediatelyafter excavationof the slope (at time
/r), the stresses
at point A mightjust havereachedthe
peakof the stress-displacement
curve,and the stresses
at pointsB and C would be lower.With time, the slope
would continueto reboundinto the cut. due to a delayed responseto the unloadingfiom the excavation,
and possiblyalso due to swellingof the clay as its
water content increasesfollowing the reduction in
stress.At a later time (r.), therefore,the displacements
at A, B, and C would all be larger,as shownin Figure
3.8. The shearstressat point A would deceaseas it
moved beyond the peak, and the shear stressesat
Excavatedslope
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t ec dl a v
1'::i:>
-\
B
a
F
a
d
0)
c
</)
D i s p l a c e m e n- tA x
Figure 3.8
l--_
29
z#
P o t e n t i asl l i ps u r f a c e
o
6
0)
a
o
o)
6
o
a
0)
s
(u
T i m et 3
u)
D i s p l a c e m e n- tA x
D i s p l a c e m e n- tA x
30
RecaPitulation
. Equilibrium must be satisfiedin terms of total
stressfor all slopestabilityanalyses.
. ln el'fectivestress analyses,pore pressuresare
subtractedfrom total stressesto evaluatethe ef'fective stresseson the shearsurface.
. In total stressanalyses,pore pressuresare not
subtracted.Shear strengthsare related to total
SITCSSCS.