c2 PDF
c2 PDF
c2 PDF
2.1Introduction
The first isolation of stable cyclic and acyclic nucleophilic carbenes by Arduengo
and Bertrand, and the development of synthetic methods for their introduction to
metals, either by direct reactions with metal precursors of the preformed, or in situ
generated carbenes, or by the silver transmetallation methodology, initiated detailed
studies aiming at a better understanding and use of these ligands in homogeneous
catalysis. The current refined description of the metal-NHC bonding across the
Periodic Table and the factors affecting it, the semi-quantitative parametrisation of
the ligand topology and the space it occupies around the metal, the dynamic processes in which N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands are involved, and the invention of ways to introduce ligand chirality, provide the essential tools for further
catalyst discovery, tuning and development. In this chapter an overview of the use
of NHC complexes as catalysts in addition reactions across CC and C-heteroatom
multiple bonds is presented. The emerging picture is that NHC ligands are unique
in some catalytic applications and complementary to the well-established tertiary
phosphines, which we initially thought they were mimicking.
A. A. Danopoulos (*)
School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield SO17 1BJ, UK
e-mail: ad1@soton.ac.uk
C. S. J. Cazin (ed.), N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Transition Metal Catalysis
and Organocatalysis, Catalysis by Metal Complexes 32,
DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2866-2_2, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
23
24
A. A. Danopoulos
COE
Rh
or
IPr
Cl
Cl
Rh
IPr
H2
COE
IPr
H
H
Cl Rh
IPr
3
COE
IMes
Cl
Rh
Rh
COE
Cl
IMes
H2
H
H
IMes
Cl
Rh
Rh
H
Cl
IMes
H
4
[Rh(COE)2Cl]2 in the presence of IMes, N,N-bis-[2,4,6-(trimethyl)phenyl]imidazol-2-ylidene, reacted with H2 at room temperature to give the trigonal bipyramidal [Rh(H)2Cl(IMes)2] 6 (which is analogous to 3) via intermediate formation of the
isolable cyclometallated 5 (Scheme2.2) [3].
N
COE
Rh
COE
Cl
Cl
Rh
COE
COE
IMes
THF, RT
N
Rh
Cl
N
H
N
N
H2
N
Rh
Cl
N
H
H
N
Scheme2.2 The formation of the rhodium dihydride complex via a cyclometallated intermediate
25
N
7
N R
R N
R
R
9 R = -methyl-benzyl
8a R = Ph
8b R = -methyl-benzyl
Fig.2.1 Chiral NHC ligand designs used in the Rh-catalysed enantioselective hydrogenation of
methyl-2-acetamido acrylate by dihydrogen
PCy3
10
NHC
Cl
Ru R
OC
IMes
L
11 R = H, L = PCy3, NHC = IMes
12 R = Ph, L = PCy3, NHC = SIMes
13 R = H, L = PPh3, NHC = IMes
14 R = H, L = PPh3, NHC = SIMes
SIMes
26
A. A. Danopoulos
Reaction of the 18e-species [Ru(H)2(CO)(IMes)(PPh3)2] 15 with trimethyl vinylsilane gave the cyclometallated complex 16 and trimethylethylsilane; 16 can be converted
to the original dihydride 15 by reaction with H2 (1 atm, room temperature) or iPrOH
(50C) [13]. Catalytically, vinylsilane can be hydrogenated by 16 in iPrOH in quantitative
yield (Fig.2.3) [14].
N
Ph3P
OC
N
H
Ru H
PPh3
15
N
H
OC Ru C
H2
Ph3P
PPh3
16
Fig.2.3 Ru-IMes and cyclometallated Ru-IMes complexes used as catalysts for the hydrogenation
of trimethylvinylsilane
Mes N
N + N
Cl
Pd
O
O
17
27
N Mes
R
Pd
R
R
19
R = COOMe
18
Fig.2.4 Components of the Pd-based catalytic system for the hydrogenation of arylalkynes. The
pre-formed complex 19 shows reduced activity
N
N
N
i Pr
2BF4
NCMe
Pd 2 +
NCMe
N
iPr
21
i Pr
N
N
N
2BF4
NCMe
Pd 2 +
NCMe
N
22
i
Pr
Fig. 2.5 Palladium-based hydrogenation catalysts with bidentate normal and abnormal
NHC ligands
28
A. A. Danopoulos
N
N
R
N
Ir +
N
R
R'
23
R = 2,6-iPr-C6H3
R' = 1-adamantyl
Ir +
Ph
N
Ph
R'
i
[BArf4]
Pr
24
R = tBu
R' = neopentyl, t Bu, i Bu
PPh2
Rh+
[BF4]
25
COOEt
27
26
Mes
N
AuCl
Si(OEt)3
HO
HO
O
support
HO
Mes
Si O
AuCl
O
H
support
EtOO
29
pincer pyridine di-carbenes [29, 30] bidentate di-carbenes [31] and functionalised
NHCs [28, 3235] are particularly successful catalysts. Steric and electronic tuning
of the coordinated NHCs is important for the successful catalysts. Less hindered,
alkyl substituted NHCs usually give more active catalysts than their analogues with
bulky aryl substituents. The influence of the electronic properties of the NHC on
activity and selectivity is more subtle. For example, imidazol-based NHC complexes
are generally most active for the reduction of ketones, while in specific cases rhodium
complexes with abnormal C4 bound NHCs are more active compared to C2 bound
analogues [36]; iridium complexes with the weaker s-donating triazol based NHCs
have been developed for the reduction of imines, alkenes and the stepwise one-pot
reductive amination of aldehydes [27]. However, the structure and property principles
underlying catalyst tuning are still underdeveloped with these ligand systems and the
NHC ligands in general. Co-ligands (for example pyridine donors, cyclopentadienyl
analogues, etc.) are also important in the catalyst design, presumably by stabilising
the metal in the active oxidation state, or providing labile sites for substrate coordination. In addition, in polydentate functionalised NHC complexes, a possible hemilability of the tethered classical donor has been implied during catalysis and supported by
spectroscopic studies [34, 37].
In the majority of the known examples, the donor of hydrogen equivalents is
isopropanol; HCOO or HCOOH/Et3N azeotrope are less successful. Aromatic
ketones (mainly acetophenone and benzophenone) were the easiest to reduce even
under mild conditions and low catalyst loadings.
The required bases for the reaction include KOH, KOtBu and K2CO3, the latter usually added in higher base/substrate ratios than KOH. However, K2CO3 is the base of
choice for the reduction of aldehydes, where aldehyde decarbonylation and subsequent
catalyst deactivation or formation of aldol side products interfere with the reduction [38].
The transfer hydrogenation of imines is more challenging due to competing formation
of the catalytically inactive complex involving s-coordination of the imine, and therefore
NHC based catalysts for this purpose are less common [27, 29, 39]. The activity of
certain NHC complexes in imine reduction has been exploited for the one-pot sequential
reductive amination of aldehydes to amines. In the reported system, the added base
K2CO3 acts also as a drying agent during the imine formation [27]. Selected complexes
that have been studied as transfer hydrogenation catalysts and related catalytic data are
shown in Figs.2.7 and 2.8 and Tables2.1 and 2.2, respectively.
Two versatile hydrogen auto-transfer processes were catalysed by the iridium complexes 41 and 42 [28, 40]. The first, N-alkylation of primary amines using alcohols as
electrophiles, involves oxidative hydrogen elimination from the alcohol to form an
aldehyde, which, in the presence of amine, is converted to imine and the latter reduced
to the secondary amine by transfer hydrogenation. The second system involves oxidative hydrogen elimination from one primary and one secondary alcohol to form an
aldehyde and ketone, respectively, which undergo aldol coupling and reduction of the
a,b-enone to alkylated alcohols. Both transformations are very attractive compared to
conventional alkylations with organic halides, due to their reduced waste [41]. The
reactions are carried out in refluxing toluene in the presence of base (KOH, KOtBu,
NaHCO3) with high conversions at low catalyst loadings (1.0 mol%).
30
A. A. Danopoulos
R
+
Ir
PF6
+
Ir
N
py
R
29
N N PF6
N
R
L
30
Ir
31 Br
OMe
R = Mes, Cy
Fig.2.7 Selected NHC complexes that have been studied as transfer hydrogenation catalysts
Mes
N
R
N
I
Ir
N
N
N
O
37
R = 2,6-iPr-C6H3
N
M+
Ir
35
Cl
N
R
N
N
I
I
Rh I Rh
N
R
Ru
N
N
36
PF6-
PF6
M
N
N
Cl
Br
Br
R
R
L
38 M = Ru, L = CO
39 M = Rh, L = Cl
R
33 M = Rh
34 M = Ir
N
Ru
N
N
Cl
R Ph3P Cl
R
Cl
N Cl
R
32
Cl
Ph
+
Ir
N
N
N
Ir
N
R
N
41
N
40
42
Fig.2.8 Selected NHC complexes that have been studied as transfer hydrogenation catalysts
Table2.1 Selected transfer hydrogenation data of R1R2C=O, R1= alkyl, phenyl, R2 = alkyl, H or
Ph. All reactions were carried out in refluxing iPrOH (82C)
Complex
(mol%)
Base (subst./base)
Time (h)
Conv. (%)
R1
R2
Ref
Ph, Ar
Me
32 (0.01)
KOH (2000/1)
2
98
[31]
p-tolyl
H
32 (0.1)
K2CO3 (2:1)
0.25
98
[38]
Ph
Me
40/41 (1.0)
KOH (10:1)
3
98
[28]
Ph
Me
37 (0.015)
KOtBu (10:1)
12
80
[29]
Ph
Me
39 (0.006)
KOH (2:1)
6
30
[30]
Ph
Me
31 (0.5)
KOH (20:1)
1.5
98
[35]
Me
32 (0.1)
KOH (200:1)
24
88
[42]
Bun
(CH2)5
(CH2)5
(CH2)5
(CH2)5
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
38 (0.005)
41 (0.1)
40 (1.0)
31 (0.5)
36 (0.5)
39 (0.006)
34 (0.1)
KOH (2:1)
KOH (1:1)
KOH (10:1)
KOH (20:1)
KOH (10:1)
KOH (2:1)
KOH (2:1)
20
4.5
5
2
2
24
2
65
99
99
98
97
98
99
[30]
[28]
[28]
[28]
[36]
[30]
[32]
31
Ref
[29]
[27]
[28]
Transfer hydrogenation of aldehydes with isopropanol without addition of external base has been achieved using the electronically and coordinatively unsaturated
Os complex 43 as catalyst. High turnover frequencies have been observed with
aldehyde substrates, however the catalyst was very poor for the hydrogenation of
ketones. The stoichiometric conversion of 43 to the spectroscopically identifiable
in solution ketone complex 45, via the non-isolable complex 44 (Scheme 2.4),
provides evidence for two steps of the operating mechanism (alkoxide exchange,
b-hydride elimination to form ketone hydride complex) of the transfer hydrogenation reaction [43].
i
PrOH
Os+ OTf H O
2
OH
IPr
Os+ OTf
O
IPr
43
Os+
IPr
44
H
45
OTf
Pr
iPr
i
N Pr
IPr Pri
Scheme2.4 Experimental evidence in support of the mechanism for the base-free transfer
hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds catalysed by complex 43
The iridium complex 35 has been also used as catalyst for the transfer hydrogenation of substituted nitroarenes [34]. Good to very good conversions were
observed (2.5 mol%, in refluxing isopropanol, 12 h). A mixture of two products was
obtained, the relative ratio of which depends on the concentration of added base
(KOH) and catalyst. (Scheme2.5)
Mes
NH2
NO2
[Ir]
KOH, iPrOH
Br
N
+ Br
Br
46
N
47
Br
N
N
Ir
35
Cl
32
A. A. Danopoulos
2.4Hydrosilylation Reactions
The hydrosi(ly)lations of alkenes and alkynes are very important catalytic processes
for the synthesis of alkyl- and alkenyl-silanes, respectively, which can be further transformed into aldehydes, ketones or alcohols by established stoichiometric organic
transformations, or used as nucleophiles in cross-coupling reactions. Hydrosilylation
is also used for the derivatisation of Si containing polymers. The drawbacks of the
most widespread hydrosilylation catalysts [the Speiers system, H2PtCl6/iPrOH, and
Karstedts complex [Pt2(divinyl-disiloxane)3] include the formation of side-products,
in addition to the desired anti-Markovnikov SiH addition product. In the hydrosilylation of alkynes, formation of di-silanes (by competing further reaction of the product
alkenyl-silane) and of geometrical isomers (a-isomer from the Markovnikov addition
and Z-b and E-b from the anti-Markovnikov addition, Scheme2.6) are also possible.
R
R'3Si-H
Pt-catalyst
R'3Si
-isomer
R'3Si
R'3Si
R
-E-isomer
-Z-isomer
Scheme2.6 Possible isomeric products in the hydrosilylation of alkynes (disilanes from further
hydrosilylation of the alkenyl silanes are excluded)
Si
Si
48 NHC = ItBu
49 NHC = ICy
50 NHC = IMes
51 NHC = SIMes
52 NHC = IPr
53 NHC = SIPr
ICy Pt
R3Si
N
ICy Pt
H
54
N
ICy
R3SiH
ICy Pt
56
55
N
ItBu
N
SiR3
Pt ICy
N
IMes
SIMes
iPr
iPr
iPr
iPr
Si
R3
N
Pr
IPr iPr
N
iPr
SIPr iPr
33
34
A. A. Danopoulos
from 58 and the exact coordination sphere of the active species [47]. On the other
hand, reactions catalysed by the cationic 57 gave from the outset the b-E-isomer.
N Me
N
N
N
+
Rh
Me
57
PF6
Rh
Br
R N
Rh
N
Br
N R
58 R = Me, nBu
N ( )n
Rh+ N BF
4
N
R
61 n = 2,3; R = Me, Mes
N
M+
PF6
N
n
Bu
59 M = Rh
60 M = Ir
NMe2
Cl ( )n
Rh
N
N
R
62 n = 2,3; R = Me, Mes
35
Si
H
[Rh]
R
H
[Rh]
Si
63
-E-vinylsilane
Si
64
H
[Rh]
Si
H
[Rh]
-Z-vinylsilane
Nickel complexes formed in situ by the reaction of Ni(1,5-COD)2 with the imidazolium salts IMesHCl or IPrHCl in the presence KOtBu catalyse the hydrosilylation
of internal or terminal alkynes with Et3SiH. Interestingly, Ni tri-butylphosphine
complexes are inactive in this hydrosilylation reaction. The monosilylated addition
products were obtained with slow addition rates of the alkyne in the reaction mixture
and were formed with variable degree of stereoselectivity, depending on the type of
the alkyne, the silane and the ligand on Ni [50].
The catalytic hydrosi(ly)lations of other C=X functional groups (X = O, NR)
constitute alternative routes to the reduction of aldehydes, ketones, imines and other
carbonyl compounds (Scheme2.9), circumventing the use of molecular hydrogen or
occasionally harsh transfer hydrogenation conditions.
O
R
SiR'3H
catalyst
SiR'3
H
R
Y
Y = alkyl, aryl, H, OR
Y
(CH2)5
(CH2)5
(CH2)5
Me
Ph
Ph
Ph
i
Pr
p-tolyl
C6H11
Benzyl
Et
Me
Me
Me
i
Pr
H
H
OEt
IPrHBF4/CuCl
65
66
IPrHBF4/CuCl
IPrHBF4/CuCl
65
66
66
66
66
66
HSiEt3 (5:1)
HSiEt3 (3:1)
HSiEt3 (2:1)
HSiEt3 (5:1)
HSiEt3 (5:1)
HSiEt3 (3:1)
HSiEt3 (2:1)
HSiEt3 (2:1)
HSiEt3 (2:1)
HSiEt3 (2:1)
HSiEt3 (2:1)
NaOtBu (20%)
NaOtBu (612%)
NaOtBu (12%)
NaOtBu (20%)
NaOtBu (20%)
NaOtBu (612%)
NaOtBu (12%)
NaOtBu (12%)
NaOtBu (12%)
NaOtBu (12%)
NaOtBu (12%)
Table2.3 Selected data for the hydrosilylation of R1YC=O, R1 = alkyl, phenyl, Y = alkyl, H or OEt
R1
Y
Catalyst (3 mol%)
Silane (Si:substrate)
Base (mol%)
T (C)
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
55
t (h)
2
0.75
0.5
4
3
3
4
0.3
0.3
0.6
6
Conv. (%)
99
100
95
96
99
98
98
94
92
70
69
Ref
[33]
[33]
[32]
[33]
[33]
[33]
[32]
[32]
[32]
[32]
[32]
36
A. A. Danopoulos
37
The proposed mechanism of the catalytic reaction involves the formation of the
Cu(I) alkoxide 68 by displacement of either the chloride or the NHC from 6567,
followed by conversion to the hydride 69 by metathetical exchange of the tertbutoxide by the H of the silane (Fig.2.10).
i Pr
i Pr
i Pr
i Pr
i Pr
Cu
Pr
Pr
Pr
i Pr
+
Cu
i Pr
Cl
X
i Pr
65
i Pr
66 X = BF4
67 X = PF6
Transfer of the hydride from the Cu to the electrophilic carbon and cleavage of
the copper alkoxide by the silane regenerates 69. Recent reports point to the influence of the type of the counter ion X of the homoleptic 6667 on the activity, the
BF4 being superior to the PF6 analogue; this effect has been attributed to differences in the rate of active catalyst generation from the homoleptic [Cu(NHC)2]+X
and NaOtBu due to solubility differences of the inorganic salts formed during the
displacement of the NHC by tBuO [54] (Scheme2.10).
i Pr
i Pr
N
Cu
Pr
i Pr
i Pr
R3SiH
i Pr
Pr
i Pr
Cu
Ot Bu
68
H
69
R
(Cl)L
N
Rh
70
Ph
Ph
R
N
R
N + N
R
Ph
Ph
71
N
N
Rh Br
R'
Cl
R = Me, i Pr
72 R = 2,6-i Pr-C6H2, R' = t Bu
73 R = Mes, R' = t Bu
Fig.2.11 Chiral ligand designs in Rh catalysts for the enantioselective hydrosilylation of carbonyl
compounds
38
A. A. Danopoulos
X-ray crystallography and variable temperature 1H NMR studies show that the
conformation of the coordinated imidazolidin-2-ylidene, in both the neutral and
cationic complexes 70, is anti, anti with respect to the Ph of the backbone of the
NHC, exclusively in the solid state and predominantly in solution at lower temperatures (75C). At room temperature in solution, possible conformer interconversion by the rotation around the phenyl-N bond of the NHC substituent is
apparent from the broadness of the peaks in the NMR spectra. Hydrosilylation of
acetophenone by Ph2SiH2 catalysed by 70 at room temperature or at 20C results
in maximum ee of 58%. However, at lower temperatures the reaction rates are
much slower [55].
NHC complexes of Rh functionalised with chiral oxazoline ligands, for example
72 and 73, have been developed as pre-catalysts for the enantioselective hydrosilylation of ketones. After abstraction of the Br from 7273 with silver reagents, the
cationic complexes obtained were employed for the hydrosilylation of prochiral
ketones with various silanes. The conversions and enantioselectivities observed
were dependent on the nature of the R and R groups of the ligand, the silane and
reaction conditions. Higher enantioselectivities for the hydrosilylation of acetophenone to 1-phenyl-ethanol were observed with bulky silanes [Ph2SiH2, ( p-tolyl)2SiH2]
at the optimum temperature (60C); both higher or lower temperatures had a detrimental effect on the ee observed. This nonlinear temperature dependence of the
ee has been interpreted by assuming two enantioselectivity determining steps in the
catalytic reaction, one possibly involving the reversible coordination of the prochiral ketone onto Rh and the other the migratory insertion of the coordinated ketone
into the RhSi bond, that can become rate-determining. Under optimised conditions
acetophenone was reduced at 92% yield, with very good ee (90%), while other
methyl-n-alkyl ketones were reduced at good asymmetric induction (6580% ee)
depending on the ketone [56]. Interestingly, introduction of a methylene spacer
between the NHC and the chiral oxazoline in 7273 results in catalysts that show
disappointing chiral induction [57].
39
Ag
N
R
N
N
Cl
Ag R
R=
Ph
N
N
AgCl
77
R
R
75 M = Ag, R = nBu, X = AgCl2
n
76 M = Au, R = Bu, X = Cl
Cl
74 M = Ag, X = AgCl2
Ph
+
M
X
X
Bu
Y N
N
Pt
n Bu
Si
Si
78 Y = N, X = H
79 Y = CH, X = H
80 Y = CH, X = Cl
Fig.2.12 Silver, gold and platinum complexes with monodentate NHC ligands as catalysts for
the diboration of alkenes and alkynes
Diboration of terminal alkenes has also been studied with other d10 metals
(Fig. 2.12) including the AgI and AuI complexes 7577 and the Pt0 complexes
7879. Styrene is diborylated with 100% selectivity and good conversions in THF
(46% for 75 and 94% for 77 at 5 mol%, 60 h) using equimolecular amounts of
(Bcat)2. The difference in activity between the Ag and Au complexes has been
ascribed to the increased lability of the AgNHC bond, which may lead to catalyst
decomposition under the reaction conditions. In both catalytic systems it is believed
that the active species involves only one coordinated NHC ligand. Complex 77 is
less active than 74 and 75, possibly due to steric reasons. The enantioselectivity of
77 in the diboration of prochiral alkenes is very low [63].
Diboration of terminal and internal alkynes by (Bcat)2 [B(cat)2:alkene = 1:1] was
also achieved by using complexes 78 and 79 at room temperature in THF. Best activity was observed with 78 containing the less electron donating triazolylidene carbene
ligand. Terminal alkenes can also be diborylated under the same conditions, however
the selectivity for the diborylated product was much lower (up to 65%) [64].
The palladium (II) NHC complexes 81 and 82 (Fig.2.13) have also been used
as catalysts in the diboration of styrene. In the presence of NaOOCCH3, (1 equiv.,
40
A. A. Danopoulos
5 mol% catalyst, in THF at rt), excellent conversions were obtained when (Bcat)2
was the boron source. Selectivities were also high for the diborylated product when
excess of (Bcat)2 was used [(Bcat)2:styrene 3:1]. Other terminal and internal
alkenes were also diborylated in high yields and selectivities under the same conditions. A mechanism involving metathetical PdB bond formation (without change
of the oxidation state) may be operating. However, an involvement of PdII/PdIV
species, formed by oxidative addition of BB to a cationic PdII and formation of an
NHC stabilised PdIV-boryl complex, is also plausible. In the presence of base
(NaOAc), the mechanism could involve transmetallation, and in this case interaction of the boron entering group with the base giving borate species may increase
its nucleophilicity and facilitate the PdB(cat) bond formation. DFT and in situ
11
B NMR experiments support these mechanistic models [65].
N
N
N
N
+
Pd
N
Br
81
Br
N
N
Pd
82
N
I
Ir Cl
N
N
83
41
with vinyl arenes proceed at rt in THF (0.05 mol%) giving high conversions (80100%)
of mixtures of alkyl or alkenyl boranes, with predominantly branched product
(7090%). Interestingly, the activity of the catalytic system is maintained days after the
completion of the reaction, while addition of PPh3 into the catalytically active system
retards or deactivates it. Aryl alkynes are hydroborated selectively to the mono-borylated product, with higher selectivity to the linear alkenyl borane. The addition of aryl
iodides into the catalytic system results in the cross coupling of the in situ formed
alkenyl boranes with the aryliodide in one pot, giving alkenyl arenes [69].
In an attempt to study the electronic effects of the substituents in the four- and
five-positions of the coordinated imidazol-2-ylidene on the MCNHC bonding, and
the related catalytic reactivity, the complexes [RhCl(1,5-COD)(NHC)], where NHC
is imidazol-2-ylidene substituted in the four- or five-positions with the s- or
p-electron withdrawing groups CF3, Cl, NO2 and CN, were used as catalysts
in the hydroboration of alkynes with HB(pin). In the hydroboration of phenylacetylene, it was found that complexes with ligands bearing p-electron withdrawing
groups in the four- and/or five-position of the imidazolylidene, were affording
lower yields of products than the ones with s-electron withdrawing groups. These
data have been interpreted as an indication that p-interactions between the coordinated NHC with a metal exist, a fact that was disputed in the early era of the NHC
ligand development, and may have important implications in catalyst design [70].
However, in the hydroboration of 1-octyne no effect was observed.
Hydroboration of acyclic and cyclic aryl alkenes with (Bpin)2 (1.1 equiv.) in the
presence of NaOtBu (1100 mol%) and MeOH (2 equiv.) is catalysed by
[CuCl(NHC)], (0.55 mol%) NHC = IMes, SIMes and ICy, and proceeds with very
good conversions and regioselectivity (Scheme2.11).
Me
Me
[CuCl(NHC)]
(Bpin) 2, NaO tBu, MeOH
B(pin)
This regioselectivity is opposite to the one observed by the non-catalysed additions of BH3THF or 9BBN to the same alkene, or those catalysed by Rh and Ir
catalysts. Chiral NHC ligands (generated from 84) on Cu under the same conditions
proceed with high enantioselectivity (enantiomeric ratio 99:1) [71] (Scheme2.12).
Me CuCl (7.5 mol%), KOtBu (30 mol%) 84
(Bpin)2 (1.1eq), MeOH, THF,-50oC, 48 h
Ph
Ph
N + N
SO3
84
Me
B(pin)
99:1 er
i Pr
Pr
i Pr
42
A. A. Danopoulos
2.6Hydroamination Reactions
Intermolecular and intramolecular hydroamination of alkenes and alkynes is an atom
economical method for the synthesis of a range of acyclic and cyclic alk(en)ylamines
from simpler amine precursors. The reaction can be catalysed by either electropositive
(main group metals, early transition metals and lanthanides-actinides) or late transition
metals, under different mechanistic regimes. The relatively facile intramolecular
hydroamination of alkynes and allenes is more ubiquitous and commonly studied.
Intermolecular hydroamination of alkenes is more challenging and examples with
activated, electron-deficient alkenes have recently appeared. Control of regioselectivity
(Markovnikov, anti-Markovnikov) and suppression of competing side-reactions (alkene isomerisation, oligomerisation, etc.) in addition to high activity, especially when
expensive late transition metals are used as catalysts, are important features of the catalyst development [72, 73]. NHC complexes with both electropositive and late transition metals have been studied as alkene and alkyne hydroamination catalysts.
A catalytic system comprising Ti(NMe2)4, LiN(SiMe3)2 and IMes has been
developed for the intermolecular hydroamination of terminal aliphatic alkynes
(1-hexyne, 1-octyne, etc.) with anilines [toluene, 100C, 10 mol% Ti(NMe2)4].
Markovnikov products were dominant. Substituted anilines reacted similarly. High
conversions (8595%) were observed with specific anilines. The optimum Ti/IMes/
LiN(SiMe3)2 ratio was 1:2:1. However, the nature of the active species and especially the role of LiN(SiMe3)2 are unclear [74].
The Rh and Ir complexes 8588 (Fig.2.14) have been tested for the intramolecular
hydroamination/cyclisation of 4-pentyn-1-amine to 2-methyl-1-pyrroline (n = 1). The
reactions were carried out at 60C (11.5 mol%) in THF or CDCl3. The analogous
rhodium systems were more active. Furthermore, the activity of 87 is higher than 85
under the same conditions, which was attributed to the hemilability of the P donor in the
former complex, or to differences in the trans-effects of the phosphine and NHC ligands,
which may increase the lability of the coordinated CO in the pre-catalyst [75, 76].
( )n
C C H
catalyst
( )n
N
NH2
N
N
OC
N
+
Rh
CO
85 A = BF4
86 A = BPh4
Ph
BPh4
+ P
Ph
M
OC CO
87 M = Rh
88 M = Ir
N
N
I
nBu
N
M
2
N
n Bu
89 M = Rh
90 M = Ir
Fig.2.14 Rhodium and iridium catalysts for the intramolecular hydroamination of alkynes
43
conversions (>95% at 2.5 mol% at 110C, overnight). Rh and Ir catalysts show very
similar activity without competing alkene isomerisation. Interestingly, no reaction
was observed with primary amines. The reaction mechanism may involve metalamido bond formation followed by alkene insertion and reductive elimination, or
p-coordination of the alkene followed by nucleophilic attack on the activated coordinated alkene [77, 78].
Hydroamination of activated alkenes has been reported with complexes 9193
(Fig.2.15). For example, 91 catalyses the hydroamination of methacrylonitrile (X =
CN in Scheme2.13) by a range of secondary amines (morpholine, thiomorpholine,
piperidine, N-methylpiperazine or aniline) in good to excellent conversions (67
99%) and anti-Markovnikov regioselectivity (5 mol%, 80C or rt, 2472 h). Low
enantioselectivies were induced (ee 3050%) depending on the amine used and the
reaction temperature [79].
Fe
N
Fe
P
Ph2
N
2+
Pd
PPh2
2PF6
NCMe
HN
2BF4
N tBu
2+
Pd NCMe
t
N Bu
91
2BF4
N Mes
2+
HN MeCN Pd NCMe
N
N Mes
N
93
92
Complexes 92 and 93 also show good activity for the hydroamination of methacrylonitrile with morpholine, piperidine or N-methylpiperazine (7093% conversion at
2.5 mol%, 90C in 24 h) [80].
N
X
+
N H
N
Cu
i Pr
Pr
NHR 94 R = Ph
95 R = CH2Ph
The well-defined copper complexes 94 and 95 (Fig. 2.16) have been used as
catalysts for the intermolecular hydroamination of electron-deficient alkenes
[Michael acceptors, X=CN, C(=O)Me, C(=O)(OMe)] and vinyl arenes substituted
44
A. A. Danopoulos
X
NHPh
RHN
[Cu] N
R
H
RNH2
R
[Cu] N
X
H
R
X
[Cu] N
+ H
N
H
NHPh
[AuCl(NHC)] (5 mol%)
AgOTf (5 mol%), MeOH
i Pr
O
NHPh
Me
45
2.7Hydrothiolation, Hydroalkoxylation
and Hydroaryloxylation Reactions
Hydrothiolations (addition of HSR across the CC multiple bond) of alkynes,
electron-deficient alkenes and electron-deficient vinyl arenes have been catalysed
by NHC complexes of Ni and Cu, respectively [Scheme2.17a-c].
R +
SH
Cat. 1 mol%
NEt3, 80oC, 5 h
R
X
RS
X
+ RS H
RS-H
isomerisation
S
(a)
(b)
(c)
SR
Ni
NHC
iPr
Ni
Cl
NHC
96 NHC = IMes
SR
97
N
Cu
iPr
iPr
SR
98 R = Ph
99 R = CH2Ph
Fig.2.17 Nickel and copper complexes as catalysts for the hydrothiolation of alkynes and
activated alkenes
46
A. A. Danopoulos
R
R
R'
R'
AuL+
105
R"OH
OR" R
R'
OR" R
H+
H+
R'
AuL
106
47
2.8Hydration Reactions
The hydration of alkynes to ketones, catalysed by [AuCl(IPr)]/AgSbF6 in 1,4-dioxane/H2O (2:1) or methanol has been studied in detail. The reaction proceeds
at surprisingly low catalyst loadings (501,000 ppm), especially, for terminal
alkynes in methanol, and is extremely sensitive to the nature of the catalyst, the
silver activator and the reaction conditions. The best activity is obtained with the
IPr ligand on Au, while silver salts with anions other than [SbF6], either reduce
the conversion or result in catalytically inactive species. Interestingly, diphenylacetylene is hydrated faster in 1,4-dioxane than methanol, the reverse behaviour
being observed for the terminal phenylacetylene. This feature may imply that two
different reaction mechanisms may be operating in dioxane and methanol, with
methanol being a non-innocent solvent. This proposition is also supported by the
detection of vinyl methylether intermediates, resulting from the direct addition of
methanol to the alkyne, which in turn converts to the final ketone product. The
nature of the catalytic species involved in this reaction is not known, but may
involve solvated, hydroxo- or alkoxo-gold complexes (NHC)Au(solvent)+, (NHC)
Au(OH), (NHC)Au(OR). The AuNHC based catalytic system described here is
much more active than the previously known phosphine analogue, [AuMe(PPh3)]
which requires the use of strong acids (H2SO4, CF3SO3H, etc.) for catalyst activation [87, 88].
The intermolecular hydration of allenes catalysed by [AuCl(IPr)]/AgOTf
(1:1, 5 mol%) in dioxane/water at room temperature, has also been studied. In most
cases, low to modest yields (2565%) of E-allylic alcohols were obtained by selective addition of the water to the terminal C atom of the allene group [89].
2.9Hydroarylation Reactions
Hydroarylation, (addition of HAr, Ar = aryl), of alkynes, catalysed by Pd(OOCCH3)2
or Pd(OOCCF3)2 in acetic acid, is an atom-economic reaction, giving rise to substituted cis-stilbenes (Fujiwara reaction). Catalytic conversions and improved
chemoselectivity to the mono-coupled product under mild conditions can be
achieved by modification of the metal coordination sphere with NHC ligands.
Hydroarylation of mesitylene by ethylpropiolate (Scheme2.19) catalysed by complex 107 (Fig. 2.18) proceeds in good conversions (8099%, 1 mol%) under mild
conditions at room temperature.
COOEt
+
COOEt
+
COOEt
COOEt
48
A. A. Danopoulos
Surprisingly, the organometallic catalyst shows good stability under the reaction
conditions (CF3COOH/CH2Cl2). In the absence of 107 (Fig.2.18), Pd(OAc)2 under
the same conditions catalyses the same reaction with reduced activity (ca. 50%
conversion in 24 h) and different chemoselectivity. Arenes, substituted by electronwithdrawing substituents react slower. Both internal and terminal alkynes undergo
the reaction, however, the former require more forcing conditions [90].
iPr
iPr
N
Pd
N
iPr
iPr
CH3
Cl
OOCCH3
107
N
N
Cl
108 M = Pd
109 M = Pt
High activities and selectivities for the Z-monoarylated stilbene were also
obtained by the intermolecular hydroarylation of pentamethylbenezene by ethylpropiolate in CF3COOH/1,2-C2H4Cl2 (1:4) catalysed by 108 (0.1 mol%, 80C, 95%
in 7 h). NHC ligands with bulkier substituents on the NHC show higher activity.
The mechanism operating in this transformation has not been fully elucidated, but
there are indications that during the reaction the NHC ligand of 108 remains bidentate. Encouraging results were also obtained when using the Pt analogue 109 as
catalyst in hydroarylation reactions [91].
The intramolecular hydroarylation/cyclisation of aryl propargylic acetates
catalysed by the system [AuCl(IPr)]/AgBF4 (1:1, 2 mol%, 7292%, rt, 5 min) was
developed as a versatile and efficient method leading to indene derivatives 110
(Scheme2.20). Analogous catalytic systems, where the IPr was substituted by PPh3,
gave lower conversions and chemo-/regio-selectivity.
OAc
OAc
Cat.
R
+
AcO R
110 (major)
111
112
OAc
Scheme2.20 The synthesis of substituted indenes by intramolecular hydroarylation of aryl propargylic acetates
The postulated mechanism for the reaction involves activation of the alkyne by
p-coordination to the cationic (IPr)Au+, followed by direct nucleophilic attack by the
electron-rich aromatic ring to form product 111. Alternatively, two 1, 2-acetate migrations give the activated allene complex, which can be cyclised to product 110 by
nucleophilic attack of the aromatic ring on the activated allene (Scheme2.21) [92].
49
OAc
Au(IPr)
OAc
R
1,2 acetate
migration
111 R
OAc
(IPr)Au R
AcO R
110 (major)
Ph
CH(COOMe)2
Ph
Ph
50
A. A. Danopoulos
R"
N
N
P Pd
Ph2
Fe
N
+
R"
R'
Fe
N N
Pd+
R'
P
Ph2
R
114
113
t
R" = Me, Bu
+
Pd
N
+
P
Ph2
115
Enantioselectivity (which is linked to the regioselectivity of the attack of the nucleophile to the coordinated allyl) in the allylic amination of 1,3-diphenyl-allyl ethyl carbonate was also very low compared to the PN system. This was attributed to the
comparable trans-influence of P and NHC functionalities, leading to poor regioselection of the two allyl termini trans to the P and NHC ligands by the nucleophile [95].
Allylic alkylation of 3-acetoxy-1,3-diphenylpropene by sodium dimethylmalonate,
catalysed by the Pd-allyl complex 115, bearing the non-symmetric phosphonium ylide
NHC ligand (5 mol%), proceeds to completion with 100% regioselectivity.
Asymmetric allylic alkylation (AAA) has been studied using a variety of novel ligand
designs containing one NHC functionality and, usually, a classical heteroatom donor. In
addition to the work mentioned earlier with ferrocenylphosphine-functionalised NHC
complexes of Pd (113), the complexes 116119 (Fig.2.20) promote enantioselectivity in
AAA reactions. A family of complexes 116 was found to induce up to 90% enantioselectivity in AAA, especially with the more rigid analogues. The nature of the NHC group
has an important influence on the stereochemical outcome of the reaction [96]. The
AAA of E-1,3-diphenylprop-3-en-1-yl acetate by sodium malonate catalysed by a class
of imine functionalised NHC complexes 117 gave excellent conversions and enantioselectivities, with ee up to 92% in one case. The synthesis of the chiral bidentate ligand
uses commercially available chiral trans-1,2-diamino-cyclohexane [97].
R R'
N
+ S
Pd
116
Ph
Ph
N
Cy
Pd
Cl
117
Cl
R
O
+ N
Mes N
P
O
N
P
Ph
N
120
N
118 R = alkyl, phenyl
Ph
119 R = 2-(3,5-xylyl)-C6H4
Fig.2.20 Chiral Pd-NHC catalysts and ligands used for the asymmetric allylic alkylation
51
121 (1 mol%)
ZnR"2
CuCl2.2H2O
or
Cu(OTf) 2.C6H6
OPO(OEt)2
R" R
R'
Conv. >98%
ee 70-98%
Mes N
Mes N
Cl
O
O
Cl Cu
O
Ag
Cu
Ag
Mes
N
121
N Mes
122
Fig.2.21 Chiral binap-based catalysts or catalyst precursors for the enantioselective allylic alkylation of allylphosphates
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Mes N
Mes N
Ph
O
ClCu
N
N Mes
Ph
123
Ph
Mes N
ClCu
Ag
O
O
Ag
N
Ph
Ph
O O
S
Ph
124
O
N
N Mes
Ph
Ag
Ag
N
O
Mes
S O
O
Ph
125
Fig. 2.22 Combination of chiral imidazolidin-2-ylidenes and biphenyl linkers in the chiral
catalysts or catalyst precursors for the asymmetric allylic alkylations
The disadvantage of using optically pure binaphthyl building blocks for the
synthesis of the NHC ligands in 121 and 122 was addressed by introducing on the
imidazolidin-2-ylidene backbone chirality originating from the easily available in
optically pure forms 1,2-diphenyl-1,2-diamino-ethane, in combination with racemic biphenyl- rather than optically pure binapthyl-NHC wingtips. The analogous
silver and copper complexes 123 and 124 (Fig. 2.22) were formed as single
atropoisomers, and catalysed the alkylation of allyl phosphates by dialkylzincs
giving excellent chemical yields and enantioselectivities [100].
52
A. A. Danopoulos
OPO(OEt) 2
DiBAL-H
R'
R"
R'
R"
The most active catalyst for this reaction is formed in situ from 125 (fig. 2.22),
in the presence of copper salts. Interestingly, high conversions and ee are only
observed with the precursor 125 but not 123 or 121 [101].
Allylic alkylations of cinnamyl carbonate by sodium malonate have been studied
with a series of ruthenium catalysts, obtained from the azolium salts 126128 and
the ruthenium complex 129 (Scheme 2.25) in MeCN or THF to give moderate
yields of mixtures of alkylated products in the allylic and ipso-carbons (90:10 to
65:35). The observed regioselectivity is inferior to similar ruthenium systems with
non-NHC co-ligands. The stereoelectronic factors which govern the observed regioselectivity were not apparent [102].
azolium salt
Ar
Ru catalyst
N
+
N Cl
Ar
Ar
N
+
N
N
+
N Cl
Ar
Ar
127
126
Ar = substituted aryl
Cl
Ar
128
Scheme2.25 Generation of ruthenium catalysts for the allylic alkylation of cinnamyl carbonate
i BuO
CO2i Bu
2C
CO2i Bu , 80oC
130
i BuO
2C
CO2iBu
131
53
Nu
disfavoured
Fe
R
R
N
Fe
Fe
Nu
Fe
Fe
Nu
131
N
Fe
Nu
130
131
Scheme 2.27 Proposed mechanism to account for the observed regioselectivity in the allylic
alkylations catalysed by Fe-NHC complexes. Other co-ligands on Fe are omitted for clarity
SnR3 +
O
R
132
H
OH
R
N
Pd
L = PPh2
pyridine
NiPr2
132
54
A. A. Danopoulos
Ph
N + N
BF4
132
H
tBu
MeO
N + N
THF
Cl
135
Mes N
PF6
+ N
136
HO
t Bu
tBu
Cl OHH
134
OMe
AgCl
133
Cu
tBu
tBu
Ph
Ph
Et
N + N
Ph
Et
137
BF4
Fig. 2.23 Chiral NHC ligand precursors and complexes used in the asymmetric alkylation of
conjugated enones
Recently, attempts were made to replace the air- and moisture-sensitive zinc and
magnesium reagents in the copper-catalysed asymmetric conjugate addition, with
55
NHC or Ag(NHC)X
ZnR'2 , Cu(OTf)2, TMSOTf or Tf2O
NHC or Ag(NHC)X
R'
R TMS(OTf)
O
R'
R
+ N
Mes N
PF6
138
Ph
Ph
Ph
N + N
N + N
HO
139
Ph
PF6
OMe MeO
140
BF4
56
A. A. Danopoulos
in THF/H2O in the presence of base (KOH or K2CO3). The labile acetates in 141 are
crucial for the success of the reaction as demonstrated by the inactivity of the corresponding iodide complexes. Interestingly, the configuration of the isolated addition product is
the opposite to that obtained by the analogous Rh-(binap) catalysed reaction with ligand
of the same configuration [113]. Other cyclic enones gave similar results. A plausible
catalytic cycle involves reaction of the catalyst with base to form the corresponding
hydroxo palladium complex which undergoes transmetallation with the phenyl boronic
acids. Insertion of the C=C bond of the enone into the PdC bond gives the oxa-allyl
species 142 or the enolate 143 which are releasing the product after hydrolysis.
Pd
N
O
X
Pd
Pd
O
142
143
141
X=OOCCH3, OOCCF3, I
Fig.2.25 Palladium catalysts and postulated intermediates in the asymmetric conjugate addition
of phenyl boronic acids to cyclohex-2-enone
144
OEt (Bpin)2, NaOt Bu, MeOH
Bpin O
Ph
N
OEt
N
Cu
Cl
144
57
[Cu(NHC)] +
Cu(NHC)
O
(Bpin)2
B(pin)
O
(Bpin)2
B(pin)
(NHC)Cu(B(pin)
B(pin)
+ ClCOOR'
[RhCl(CO)(PPh3)2] 1 mol%
toluene,
100oC
Cl
R
COOR'
R'OOC
R
major
Cl
minor
R'
[Ir(-Cl)(1,5-cod)]2
Cl
OiPr
R'
R
Cl
,CO
P OiPr
Cy2
R
O
R'
Cl
[IrCl(1,5-cod)(IPr)]
R'
Cl
R
58
A. A. Danopoulos
2.13Conclusion
Since the isolation of relatively stable nucleophilic carbenes, their use as ligands for
almost all metals of the Periodic Table and their applications in homogeneous
catalysis have risen exponentially. This is attested by the increasing number of
researchers from diverse backgrounds that are entering this area of study. The
deeper understanding of the steric and electronic characteristics of the carbene
ligands, and the way they interact with the metal in a catalytic species promise new
developments in the rational design of more active, selective and stable catalysts
for numerous applications [118]. We believe that exciting developments in this area
will appear in the near future.
References
59
23. Perry MC, Cui X, Powell MT, Hou DR, Reibenspies JH, Burgess K (2003) J Am Chem Soc
125:113123
24. Fan Y, Cui X, Burgess K, Hall B (2004) J Am Chem Soc 126:1668816689
25. Corma A, Puebla-Gutierrez E, Iglesias M, Monge A, Perez-Ferreras S, Sanchez F (2006)
Adv Synth Catal 348:18991907
26. Hillier AC, Lee HM, Stevens ED, Nolan SP (2001) Organometallics 20:42464252
27. Gnanamgari D, Moores A, Rajaseelan E, Crabtree RH (2007) Organometallics 26:
12261230
28. Gnanamgari D, Sauer ELO, Schley ND, Butler C, Incarvito CD, Crabtree RH (2009)
Organometallics 28:321325
29. Danopoulos AA, Winston S, Motherwell WB (2002) Chem Commun 13761377
30. Peris E, Mata JA, Crabtree RH, Poyatos M (2003) Organometallics 22:11101114
31. Crabtree RH, Faller JW (2002) Organometallics 21:35963604
32. Peris E, Mas-Marza E, Sanau M (2005) Inorg Chem 44:99619967
33. Stylianides N, Danopoulos AA, Tsoureas N (2005) J Organomet Chem 690:59485958
34. Wang CY, Fu CF, Liu YH, Peng SM, Liu ST (2007) Inorg Chem 46:57795786
35. Turkmen H, Pape T, Hahn FE, Cetinkaya B (2008) Eur J Inorg Chem 54185423
36. Yang L, Kruger A, Neels A, Albrecht M (2008) Organometallics 27:31613171
37. Danopoulos AA, Fiddy SG, Evans J, Neisius T, Newton MA, Tsoureas N, Tulloch AAD
(2007) Chem Eur J 13:36523659
38. Miecznikowski JR, Crabtree RH (2004) Organometallics 23:629631
39. Kuhl S, Schneider R, Fort Y (2003) Organometallics 22:41844186
40. Peris E, da Costa AP, Viciano M, Sanau M, Merino S, Tejeda J, Royo B (2008)
Organometallics 27:13051309
41. Guillena G, Ramon DJ, Yus M (2007) Angew Chem Int Ed 46:23582364
42. Crabtree RH, Faller JW (2002) Organometallics 21:35963604
43. Castarlenas R, Esteruelas MA, Onate E (2008) Organometallics 27:32403247
44. Berthon-Gelloz G, Buisine O, Briere JF, Michaud G, Sterin S, Mignani G, Tinant B,
Declercq JP, Chapon D, Marko IE (2005) J Organomet Chem 690:61566168
45. Sprengers JW, Mars MJ, Duin MA, Cavell KJ, Elsevier CJ (2003) J Organomet Chem
679:149152
46. De Bo G, Berthon-Gelloz G, Tinant B, Marko IE (2006) Organometallics 25:18811890
47. Poyatos M, Mas-Marza E, Mata JA, Sanau M, Peris E (2003) Eur J Inorg Chem
12151221
48. Mas-Marza E, Sanau M, Peris E (2005) Inorg Chem 44:99619967
49. Jimenez MV, Perez-Torrente JJ, Bartolome MI, Gierz V, Lahoz FJ, Oro LA (2008)
Organometallics 27:224234
50. Chaulagain MR, Mahandru GM, Montgomery J (2006) Tetrahedron 62:75607566
51. Dez-Gonzlez S, Nolan SP (2008) Acc Chem Res 41:349358
52. Dez-Gonzlez S, Scott NM, Nolan SP (2006) Organometallics 25:23552358
53. Kaur H, Zinn FK, Stevens ED, Nolan SP (2004) Organometallics 23:11571160
54. Dez-Gonzlez S, Stevens ED, Scott NM, Petersen JL, Nolan SP (2008) Chem Eur J
14:158168
55. Faller JW, Fontaine P (2006) Organometallics 25:58875893
56. Cesar V, Bellemin-Laponnaz S, Wadepohl H, Gade LH (2005) Chem Eur J 11:28622873
57. Schneider N, Kruck M, Bellemin-Laponnaz S, Wadepohl H, Gade LH (2009) Eur J Inorg
Chem 493500
58. Thomas RL, Souza FES, Marder TB (2001) J Chem Soc Dalton Trans 16501656
59. Mann G, John KD, Baker RT (2000) Org Lett 2:21052108
60. Baker RT, Nguyen P, Marder TB, Westcott SA (1995) Angew Chem Int Ed 34:13361338
61. Dai C, Robins EG, Scott AJ, Clegg W, Yufit DS, Howard JAK, Marder TB (1998) Chem
Commun 19831984
62. Ramirez J, Corberan R, Sanau M, Peris E, Fernandez E (2005) Chem Commun 30563058
60
A. A. Danopoulos
61
102. Yasar S, Ozdemir I, Cetinkaya B, Renaud JL, Bruneau C (2008) Eur J Org Chem
21422149
103. Plietker B, Dieskau A, Moews K, Jatsch A (2008) Angew Chem Int Ed 47:198201
104. Barczak NT, Grote RE, Jarvo ER (2007) Organometallics 26:48634865
105. Fraser PK, Woodward S (2001) Tetrahedron Lett 42:27472749
106. Winn CL, Guillen F, Pytkowicz J, Roland S, Mangeney P, Alexakis A (2005) J Organomet
Chem 690:56725695
107. Arnold PL, Rodden M, Davis KM, Scarisbrick AG, Blake AJ, Wilson C (2004) Chem
Commun 16121613
108. Clavier H, Coutable L, Toupet L, Guillemin J-C, Mauduit M (2005) J Organomet Chem
690:52375254
109. Lee K, Hoveyda AH (2009) J Org Chem 74:44554462
110. Lee K, Brown MK, Hird AW, Hoveyda AH (2006) J Am Chem Soc 128:71837184
111. Martin D, Kehrli S, dAugustin M, Clavier H, Mauduit M, Alexakis A (2006) J Am Chem
Soc 128:84168417
112. Matsumoto Y, Yamada K, Tomioka K (2008) J Org Chem 73:45784581
113. Zhang T, Shi M (2008) Chem Eur J 14:37593764
114. Lillo V, Prieto A, Bonet A, Diaz-Requejo MM, Ramirez J, Perez PJ, Fernandez E (2009)
Organometallics 28:659662
115. Hua R, Shimada S, Tanaka M (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120:1236512366
116. Sim H, Baek JY (2008) Synlett 551554
117. Iwai T, Fujihara T, Terao J, Tsuji Y (2009) J Am Chem Soc 131:66686669
118. For a recent review on Late Transition Metal-NHC complexes and catalysis see: DezGonzlez S, Marion N, Nolan SP (2009) Chem Rev 109:36123676
http://www.springer.com/978-90-481-2865-5