CASES FOR CIVIL PROCEDURE (ATTY. JOHN R.
JACOME)
Deadline: January 7, 2015
State the facts, issue/s & ruling of the following cases. (Handwritten, yellow papers)
JURISDICTION I.E. OVER SUBJECT MATTER, BY LAW: SINDICO V DIAZ, 440 SCRA 50, OCTOBER 1, 2004.
JURISDICTION DISTINGUISHED FROM VENUE: MANILA RAILROAD V ATTY. GENERAL, 20 PHIL 523, DECEMBER 11, 1911.
JURISDITION VOID: ABBAIN V. CHUA, 22 SCRA 748, FEBRUARY 26, 1968.
JURISDICTION BY ESTOPPEL (GENERAL RULE): SEAFDEC V NLRC (LAZAGA)
JURISDICTION BY ESTOPPEL (EXCEPTION): SOLIVEN VS FASTFORMS PHILS., 440 SCRA 389, OCTOBER 18, 2004.
ONCE ATTACHED, JURISDICTION NOT OUSTED BY SUBSEQUENT STATUTE UNLESS SO PROVIDED: SOUTHERN FOOD
SALES CORPORATION VS. SALAS, 206 SCRA 333, FEB 18, 1992.
ACQUIRED JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON (OF THE DEFENDANT THRU SERVICE OF SUMMONS): BOTICANO V CHU, JR,
148 SCRA 541, MARCH 16, 1987.
ACQUIRED JURISDICTION OVER THE PERSON (OF THE DEFENDANT BY VOLUNTARY SUBMISSION): RODRIGUEZ VS
ALIKPALA, 57 SCRA 455, JUNE 25, 1974.
ACQUIRED JURISDICTION OVER THE RES: EL BANCO ESPAOL-FILINO V. PALANCA, 37 PHIL. 921, MARCH 26, 1918.
ACQUIRED JURISDICTION OVER THE ISSUES: SPS GONZAGA V CA (SPS ABAGAT), OCTOBER 18, 2004.
COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION: GO V TONG, G.R. NO. 151942, NOVEMBER 27, 2003.
CAUSE OF ACTION: FELIPE V LEUTERIO, 91 PHIL 482, MAY 30, 1952.
MISJOINDER: UNION GLASS V SEC (HOFILEA), 126 SCRA 32, NOVEMBER 28, 1983.
PARTIES: JUASING HARDWARE V MENDOZA, 115 SCRA 783, JULY 30, 1982.
PARTIES IN INTEREST: CARILLO, GUYOT, SENOY, RISONAR, GONZALES V. CA (DABON AND DABON) GR NO. 121165,
SEPTEMBER 26, 2006.
CLASS SUIT: OPOSA V FACTORAN, 224 SCRA 792, JULY 30, 1993.
KINDS OF PARTIES/COMPULSORY JOINDER OF INDISPENSABLE PARTIES: ARCELONA V. CA (FARNACIO), G.R. NO. 102900,
OCT. 2, 1997.
PERMISSIVE JOINDER: FLORES V MALLARE-PHILLIPS, 144 SCRA 377, SEPTEMBER 24,1986.
VENUE: TIME, INC. VS. REYES, 39 SCRA 303, MAY 31, 1971.
PLEADINGS (IN GENERAL: MANNER OF MAKING ALLEGATIONS IN PLEADINGS, ACTIONABLE DOCUMENT): SANTIAGO VS DE
LOS SANTOS, 61 SCRA 146, NOVEMBER 22, 1974.
CLAIM, COUNTERCLAIM/CROSS-CLAIM AFTER ANSWER: NAMARCO V. FEDERACION, 49 SCRA 238, JANUARY 31, 1972.
AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS: YOUNG VS SPOUSES SY, GR NO. 157745, SEPTEMBER 26, 2006.
THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT: REPUBLIC V CENTRAL SURETY & INSURANCE COMPANY, 26 SCRA 741, OCTOBER 26, 1968.
COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIM/CROSS-CLAIM: CALO VS. AJAX INTERNATIONAL, INC, 22 SCRA 996, MARCH 13, 1968.
THE ANSWER, ON DEFENSES (RULE 8, ALLEGATIONS DEEMED ADMITTED): TEC BI & CO V CHARTERED BANK OF INDIA,
AUSTRALIA AND CHINA, 41 PHIL 596, FEB 5, 1916.
HOW TO CONTEST DOCUMENT: PHILIPPINE BANKING CORPORATION V CA (AMALIO L. SARMIENTO), JANUARY 13, 2004.
DEFENSE/OBJECTION WAIVED: KATON V PALANCA, G.R. NO. 151149, SEPTEMBER 7, 2004.
COMMON PROVISIONS (RE PARTS OF PLEADING): FIL-ESTATE GOLF AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. V CA (CABUCO-ANDRES),
265 SCRA 614, DECEMBER 16, 1996.
RE: MANNER OF MAKING ALLEGATIONS: PERPETUAL SAVINGS V FAJARDO, 223 SCRA 720, JUNE28,1993.
RE: EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PLEAD: SPOUSES DELOS SANTOS VS RTC (HON. EMMANUEL C. CARPIO), G.R. NO.
153696, SEPTEMBER 11, 2006.
STRIKING OUT PLEADINGS: DAUDEN-HERNAEZ V ANGELES, HOLLYWOOD FAR EAST PRODUCTIONS, INC., AND
VALENZUELA, 27 SCRA 1276, APRIL 30, 1969.
FILING/ SERVICE OF PLEADINGS, JUDGMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS: BAUTISTA V MAYA-MAYA COTTAGES INC., G.R. NO.
148361, NOV. 29, 2005.
COMPUTATION OF TIME: SPS. CONRADO AND MA. CORONA ROMERO VS. CA, SATURNINO S. ORDEN, G.R. NO. 142406, MAY
16, 2005.
SUMMONS: TOYOTA CUBAO V. CA (GUEVARRA), G.R. NO. 126321, OCTOBER 23, 1997.
SUBSTITUTED SERVICE: QUELNAN V. VHF PHIL., G.R. NO. 138500, SEPTEMBER 16, 2005.
SUMMONS (CONTENTS, WHEN ISSUED, BY WHOM ISSUED, MODES OF SERVICE): GUIGUINTO CREDIT COOPERATIVE, INC
V TORRES, G. R. NO. 170926, SEPTEMBER 15, 2006.
MODE OF SERVICE UPON CERTAIN DEFENDANTS (UPON DOMESTIC PRIVATE JURIDICAL ENTITY): PALUWAGAN NG BAYAN
SAVINGS BANK VS. KING, 172 SCRA 131, APRIL 12, 1989.
MODE OF SERVICE UPON CERTAIN DEFENDANTS (UPON FOREIGN PRIVATE JURIDICAL ENTITY): FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
V DELA OSA, 89 SCRA 131, MARCH 26, 1979.
MODE OF SERVICE UPON CERTAIN DEFENDANTS (UPON DEFENDANT WHOSE IDENTITY/WHEREABOUTS UNKNOWN):
BALTAZAR VS CA (GOOD EARTH ENTERPRISES), G.R. NO. 78728, DECEMBER 8, 1988.
MOTIONS IN GENERAL/MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER RULE 16:
-US V. RUIZ, 136 SCRA 487, MAY 22, 1985.
-NATIONAL UNION VS STOLT-NIELSEN, 184 SCRA 682, APRIL 26, 1990.
-BALO V CA (JUDGE ASIS, GARRIDO), GR NO. 129704, SEPTEMBER 30, 2005.
-SEA-LAND SERVICE INC V CA (A.P. MOLLER/ MAERSK LINE), MARCH 2, 2000.
-SWAGMAN HOTELS V. CA, G.R. 161135, APRIL 8, 2005.
-GOODYEAR V. SY, G.R. 154554, NOV 9, 2005.
-ANGELITA MORCAL VS. ANTONIO LAVIA ET. AL., 476 SCRA 508 (2005).
-PASCUAL VS PASCUAL, G.R. NO 157830, NOVEMBER 17, 2005.
-DIU V CA (BUSHNELL AND PAGBA), G.R. NO. 115213, DEC.19, 1995.
