SESSION - 5
DEALING
WITH THE COMPETITION
Trendy & high end designer lines :
Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger & GAP
Traditional brands:
Western Wranglers & Urban Lee cooper
Levi Strauss
$7.1billion (1996) US Sales $4 billion (2003)
Classic 501
Popular & lower-priced private labels: JC Penneys Arizona & Hip/ youthful lines: American Eagle, Bugle Boy, JNCO, Lucky & Diesel
Redesigned strategy Premium Red Tab line upscale department stores like Nordstrom & Neiman Marcus
Sears Canyon River Blues
Signature brand discount stores like Wal-Mart
Entry Barriers Economies of scale product differences Brand identity Switching costs Capital requirements Access to distribution Absolute cost advantages Proprietary learning curve
Access to necessary inputs Proprietary low-cost product design
Rivalry Determinants Industry growth
New Entrants
Product differences Brand identity Switching costs Informational complexity Diversity of competitors Corporate stakes Exit barriers
Threat of New Entrants
Bargaining Power
of Suppliers Suppliers
Industry Competitors
Bargaining Power
of Buyers Buyers
Threat of Determinants of Supplier Power Differentiation of inputs Switching costs of suppliers and firms in the industry Presence of substitute inputs Supplier concentration Cost relative to total purchases in the industry Impact of inputs on cost or differentiation Threat of forward integration relative to threat of backward integration by firms in the industry Substitutes Intensity of Rivalry Determinants of Buyer Power
Bargaining Leverage Buyer concentration vs. firm concentration Buyer volume Buyer switching costs Substitute products Buyer information
Substitutes
Price Sensitivity Price/total purchases Product differences Brand identity Impact on quality/ performance
Source: Porter's 5 Forces - Elements of Industry Structure (source: Porter, 1985, p.6)
Determinants of Substitution Threat Relative price performance of substitutes Switching costs Buyer propensity to substitute
Porters 5 Forces model: Buyers bargaining power
Buyers are Powerful if: Example Buyers are concentrated - there are a few buyers Ministry of Defense purchases from with significant market share defense contractors Buyers purchase a significant proportion of Wal-Mart and Sears' large retail market output - distribution of purchases or if the provides power over manufacturers product is standardized Buyers possess a backward integration threat - can Large auto manufacturers' purchases of threaten to buy producing firm or rival tires Buyers are Weak if: Producers threaten forward integration - producer can take over own distribution/retailing Significant buyer switching costs - products not standardized and buyer cannot easily switch to another product Buyers are fragmented (many, different) - no buyer has any particular influence on product or price Example Movie-producing companies have integrated forward to acquire theaters like Rajshree, PVRs.
Buying of Medicines.
Confectioneries
Producers supply critical portions of buyers' input Intel's relationship with PC manufacturers - distribution of purchases
Porters 5 Forces model: Suppliers bargaining power
Suppliers are Powerful if: Forward integration threat by suppliers Example Chemical manufacturers started producing pharmaceutical products Drug industry's relationship to hospitals e.g. high cost surgical items
Suppliers concentrated Significant cost to switch suppliers
Suppliers are Weak if: Many competitive suppliers - product is standardized Purchase commodity products
Microsoft's relationship with PC manufacturers
Example Confectionery products like cookies, breads etc. Grocery store brand label products
Backward integration threat by purchasers Tea producers relationship to Tea estate companies Concentrated purchasers Garment industry relationship to major retail stores like Wal-Mart
Porters 5 Forces model: Barrier/ Threat to entry
Easy to Enter if there is: - Common technology Difficult to Enter if there is: - Patented or proprietary know-how
- Little brand loyalty
- Access to distribution channels - Low scale threshold (break even)
- Difficulty in brand switching
- Restricted distribution channels - High scale threshold
e.g. Confectionery.
- e.g. knowledge based industries.
Easy to Exit if there are:
- Salable assets - Low exit costs - Independent businesses e.g. exclusive distributors, ancillary manufacturers.
Difficult to Exit if there are:
- Specialized assets - High exit costs - Interrelated businesses e.g. Capital intensive industries.
Competitive analysis of Global Airline Industry
Rivalry within Airline Industry:
Competition is intense Several airlines are operating on the same route. Compete aggressively on offering like fares, frequent flyer membership privileges etc.
Threat of New Entrants:
Require capital investment but due to offerings like long-term bank loans on less interest to business sectors, increased the threat of new entrants.
Threat of Substitutes:
Options of cheaper travel means like trains etc. Domestic airlines have greater threats than the international carriers.
Bargaining power of Suppliers:
Limited suppliers i.e. Boeing and Airbus.
Bargaining power of Buyers:
Customers have higher bargaining power in the domestic airlines compared to the international routes.
Driving forces in the Porters 5 Forces Model
Directions of New Competition
Global competitors entering in new markets/ categories Online competitors seeking cost-effective ways to expand distribution
Intensity of new competitive forces
Brand extensions from strong mega brands leveraging their strengths to move into new categories
Private labeling and store
brands designed to provide
low-priced alternatives
Analyzing Competitors
Strategies Competitor Actions Objectives
Reaction Patterns
Strengths & Weaknesses
Analyzing Competitors cont
Company need to gather information about competitors strengths and weaknesses on three parameters: Share of market: competitors share of the target market. Share of mind: percentage of customers remember competitors features. Share of heart: percentage of customers prefer competitors features.
Competitor Analysis
Identifying Competitors Assessing Competitors
Determining Objectives
Identifying Strategies Assessing Strengths and Weaknesses Estimating Reaction Patterns
Selecting Competitors to Attack and to Avoid
Competitor Analysis
The Strength of the Competitors positioning What market share does each competitor have? (secondary sources) How strong is each competitors image? (primary sources- highly sensitivity) how is the financial performance of each competitor? (secondary sources) Is there any focus or areas of concentration of competitors? (published & primary sources highly sensitive data) How is each element of marketing mix deployed by competitors? (secondary & primary sources) How satisfied is competitors customer base? (primary sources- highly sensitive data) What are the loyalty levels exists for competitors? (primary sources- highly sensitive data) How satisfied are each distribution channels with the competitors (primary sourcesmoderately sensitive data)
The Strength of the Competitors offerings
The Strength of the Competitors resources Understanding the competitors strategies
Size of the resource base. Level of efficiency of production base Effectiveness of product development process support of R&D. What is the competitors strategic motive? What are their moves and reactions?
Kodaks products Instant cameras & instant film Photogra phic paper
Principal competitors Polaroid
Competitive environment for Eastman Kodak products in 1970s
Kodaks market position Intensity and bases of competition Likelihood of new entrants High Challenger to a well-established leader High & increasing with greater emphasis on innovation
Kodaks core strategy Penetration pricing to sell
cameras faster
than competitors Medium Sustaining share by emphasizing quality of Kodak paper & educating consumers Separate sales & service networkleveraging firms image and marketing capabilities in microfilm equipment area
Fuji Photo Film Co.
Leader but being
High the attack is due to stress on lower prices & quality Very high due to greater emphasis to innovation, cost & service
threatened by Fuji
& other Japanese companies
Office copiers
Xerox, IBM, 3M
Late entrant to highly competitive market- Xerox held 75% share
Very high
(from
Japanese firms)
Industry Competition
Number of Sellers & Degree of Differentiation Entry, Mobility, Exit barriers
Cost Structure
Degree of Vertical Integration Degree of Globalization
Industry Structure types
Absolute Monopoly: Due to patent protection, license, economies-of-scale: only one firm provides the product or service. (e.g. Pharmaceutical Co.s formulations) Differentiated Oligopoly: few firms produce specialized products- partially differentiated. (e.g. Zhandu & Dabur Chawanprash)
Pure Oligopoly: few firms produce the same product (e.g. BHEL & Cromptons - Switchgears division)
Oligopolistic: Small number of producers who often act together to control the supply of a particular good and its market price It is dominated by a few large suppliers who are
interdependent on each other, before making any pricing and investment decisions. e.g. OPEC (The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, twelve countries made up of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, UAE
and Venezuela) is an example of Oligopolistic since few countries control the production of oil. Monopolistic competition: many firms offer differentiated product/ service. (e.g. Banking, Insurance, Mutual Fund Companies) Pure competition: numerous firms offer the same product/ service. (e.g. reaching a stage similar to pani-puri wallas)
Number of Sellers & Degree of Differentiation
Pure Monopoly: local cable network Oligopoly: Pure oligopoly like Oil, steel lower prices can only sustain market pie for long run; Differentiated oligopoly like autos, camera partially differentiated in quality, features, style & services. Monopolistic: Many competitors differentiate clearly on offers, concentrate on specific market segments and charge customized prices like restaurants, ethical drug manufacturers etc. Pure competition: Many competitors offers the same product/service to many customers like commodity markets.
Five Industry Structure types
Differentiated product
ONE
Undifferentiated product
Number of Sellers
1. Pure Monopoly
FEW
2. Differentiated 3. Pure Oligopoly Oligopoly
4. Monopolistic 5. Pure Competition Competition
MANY
Entry, Mobility & Exit barriers
Entry Barriers:
High capital requirements Economies-of-scale
Patents & license requirements
Scarce locations & raw materials Scarce distributors/ channels Reputation & trust factor
Mobility Barriers: heavy investment industries (infrastructure) are location
specific mobility is difficult compare to other industries.
Exit Barriers:
Legal obligations
Capital blockage/ investment Government restrictions Lack of alternative opportunities
Barriers and Profitability
Exit barriers Entry Barriers Low Low, stable Low returns High, stable High returns High Low, risky returns High, risky returns
Cost Structure
Heavy manufacturing high raw material costs. Confectionery & FMCG high
distribution & marketing costs.
Degree of Vertical Integration
Backward or Forward integration: Oil companies (Reliance Industries Ltd,
RIL) Oil exploration, Oil drilling, Oil
refining, Chemical manufacturer & service stations.
Degree of Globalization
Nature of business like Oil, Aircrafts,
Cameras, Steel companies etc need
to grow fast across geographies to share risk and achieve economies-of-
scale across markets maintain the
pace of technological inducements.
Analyzing competitors: Strategic Groups
High
Group A Narrow line Lower mfg. cost Very high service High price Group B Full line Low mfg. cost Good service Medium price
GE, Whirlpool & Sears Planet Health, Dialforhealth (Zydus), Apollo chains/ GM & Ford (Automobiles)/ Haldiram (Mixtures)
Quality
Group C Moderate line Medium mfg. cost Medium service Medium price
V-mart, Big Bazar
Confectionery shops (local), Mother Dairy (Milk variants)
Low
Group D Broad line Medium mfg. cost Low service Low price
High
Vertical Integration
Low
Blue Line Strategy*
*Prof. Chan Kim & Prof. Renee Mouborgne
Example: A highly competitive Industry
The American Wine Industry
What the industry offers?
Premium Wines
Strategic Groups
Budget Wines
Massive Choice
American Wine Industry
3rd largest in world: worth $20 billion Californian makes 66% - the rest is from Italy, France, Spain, Chile, Argentina, Australia Exploding number of new wines new vineyards in Oregon, Washington, New York Customer base stagnant 31st in the world in per capita consumption!
American Wine Industry
Top 8 producers had 75% of the market; 1600 had the remaining 25%
$ millions spent in marketing intense competition Sever price pressure
The dominant growth strategy was towards premium wines more complexity, better image, more prestigious vineyards, number of medals won at wine festivals.
Premium and Budget Wines
Offering Level vs. Wine Drinkers Expectations
Very high
High
Normal
Low
Very low
Nonexistent
What people said
It is too confusing and complex Wine descriptions and terminology The shopping experience (lack of fun) The lack of clear guidance on what to buy and drink Thus, non-influential for non customers (the large majority of the US population who were not wine drinkers)
Yellow Tail created a Blue Ocean
Premium
Creating a Blue Ocean
Budget
Yellow Tail Strategy
Eliminated: Complex terminology and distinctions, Above the line marketing
Reduced: Wine complexity and Wine range
Raised: Price versus Budget Wines, Simplicity of retail store environment, Enthusiasm of Sales People Created: Easy drinking, Ease of selection, Sense of fun and adventure
Yellow Tail Value Curve
Very high
High
Normal
Low
Very low
Nonexistent
Casella Wines: How they applied Blue Ocean Strategy?
Casella Wines, an Australian winery, looked at the demand from drinkers of beer, spirits and ready-to-drink cocktails (3 times the US consumers of Wine) Redefined the wine industry with fun and adventure, nontraditional wine that is easy to drink. Offered and positioned as Social drink accessible to everyone i.e. beer, cocktail and other drinkers of non-wine beverages. In 2 years, the fun and social drink (Yellow tail) emerged as the fastest growing brand in the history of Australian and US Wine industries. By Aug 2003, it was number 1 Red Wine in 730 ml bottle sold in US ahead of all the California labels with average annual sales of 4.5 million cases. Company found that, US drinkers reject wine because of complicated taste and is difficult to appreciate. Beer and ready-to-drink cocktails were much sweeter. They offered wine which was soft in taste and easily available like beer and ready-to-drink cocktails. They introduced primary flavors and fruits flavors which provide sweet taste and customer feel fresher and would like to enjoy another glass of wine without thinking.
Results
No 1 imported wine (outsells France and Italy) Fastest growing wine in the history of the USA industry: New consumers of wine
Jug drinkers trade up
Premium wine drinkers trade down
Industry criticizes them at first
New wine gives it a best buy for value; winning wine awards.
Summary
Conventional Logic
Industry Assumption Strategic Focus
Blue Ocean Logic
Industry condition can be shaped.
Industry conditions are given
Build competitive advantages to beat the competition.
Create an equity and buyer value to dominate and sustain the market.
Customers
Retain and expand the customer
Go for the mass of buyers Focus on key customer value
base through further segmentation
and customization. Focus on existing customer differences.
Summary
Conventional Logic
Assets & Capabilities
Blue Ocean Logic
Think free from a companys
existing assets and capabilities. Ask, what if we start anew? Think in terms of buyers solution even if that overrule the industry.
Think in terms of a companys
existing assets and capabilities. Build on what it has.
Product/ Service offerings
Think in terms of
products/services offered by the industry. Seek to maximize the
Seek to solve buyers major
problems/compromises in using the products/services of the industry.
value out of these offerings.
Four Actions to create a Blue Ocean
Raise What factors should be raised well beyond the industry standard?
Eliminate
Create What factors should be created that the industry has never offered?
What factors should be eliminated that the industry has taken for granted?
Reduce What factors should be reduced well below the industry standard?
Market Structure & Strategies
Microsoft (softwares), Gillette (razor blades), LG (consumer electronics) Kmart Wal-Mart, Nokia Motorola, Pepsi - Coca-Cola
Bigbazar Superbazar (Retail), GodrejWhirlpool (refrigerator), HMT-Titan
BMW, Tanisq, Kingfisher Airlines
Market nicher
Market Leader
Market Challenger
Market Follower
Expand Market Defend Market Share Expand Market Share
Attack leader
Imitate
Specialize
Competitive Positions
Competitive Positions
Firm with the Largest Market Share
Competitive Strategies
Expand Total Market Protect Market Share Expand Market Share Full Frontal Attack Indirect Attack
Market Leader
Market Challenger
Runner-Up Firms that Fight Hard to Increase Market Share
Runner-Up Firms that Want to Hold Their Share Without Rocking the Boat Firms that Serve Small Segments Not Being Pursued by Other Firms
Market Followers
Follow Closely Follow at a Distance By Customer, Market, Quality-Price, Service Multiple Niching
Market Nichers
Strategies for Market Leaders
Market Leadership
Expansion of the Overall market
Defending the Existing market share
Expansion of the Current market share
Targeting customer groups that currently are non-users Identifying new uses for product/service
Increasing usage rates
Strong market positioning Development & refinement of competitive advantages Continuous product & process innovation proactive Heavy promotions Strong customer relations Strong channel relations
Heavy
promotions Improved distribution Price incentives product portfolio expansion Mergers & Takeovers Geographic expansion Distribution expansion
Stage 1: Expansion of Overall Market
Strategy: Search for new users HONDAs Strategies for Indian Markets Year & Target Offer & promotional emphasis Strategy Customers
Honda increased its sales by targeting groups that Developed range of smalltraditionally had never economic-light weight bought motorcycles. motorcycles
1960s-1970s:
heavy advertising giving emphasis to convenience and style
1980s:
identified potential for selling motorcycles delivering a fashion symbol styling become relevant repositioning.
middle-aged executive market
Offer: Series of larger motorcycle. Supported by heavy advertising emphasis on youthful values.
Stage 2: Expansion of Overall Market
Strategy: New Uses
Company Du PontsNylon Initial uses Reformulated/ redefined uses
used as synthetic fibre for used for shirts, tyres, carpets, various parachutes industrial and engineering uses
Teflon lubricants and Oils
used as high American space programme
for applications in protection for fabrics, cloths and carpets.
performance lubricant for cooking and motor oils;
Stage 3: Expansion of Overall Market
Strategies: Greater usage levels (existing users increasing usage rates) * Procter & Gamble (P&G)
Head & Shoulders Shampoo
Basis of promotion: two applications were more
effective than one.
Preity Zinta Brand Ambassador
9 billion shampoo market
Procter & Gamble (P&G) Head & Shoulders Shampoo
3. Feeling her freshly washed hair Preity comments, "Itne soft baal, kya aap
1. The ad opens with a product shot of a Head & Shoulders shampoo bottle. 2. In the next scene, Preity Zinta is shown washing her hair with the shampoo.
5. ...Head & Shoulders smooth and silky se. Yeh dandruff hundred percent hataye aur moisturise bhi karen, baal rahe soft subah se raat tak." 8. At this the two suddenly wake up and smile sheepishly - "Head & Shoulders smooth and silky, dandruff free soft baal, subah se raat tak."
nahin chahte yeh ehsas din bhar rahe?"
4. Walking before the photographers, the actress showing off her hair. "Paaiye dandruff free soft baal, dono ek saath...
6. It is work time and the star's coactor too busy admiring the former's hair, fails to hear the director
7. Seeing the two actors carrying on with the scene, the director has to once again scream, "Cut" and give them a jolt.
saying, "Cut."
Strategies of Market Leader: 1. Expanding the total market
New customers: those who might have use it but occassionally (market-penetration strategy chocolates); those who had never used it (new market segment strategy filtered vs. instant coffee Nescafe); or new geographical locations (geographical-expansion strategy- McDonalds).
More or additional usage: soft drinks and snacks markets identify opportunities/ gaps in HHs schedule.
Strategies of Market Leader: 2. Defending the Market Share
Caterpillar become leader in the construction-equipment market by wider service, consistent performance and premium pricing being challenged by players like Komatsu, Hitachi and many others. Co. adopted following strategies: Consistent performance: high quality outputs every time, reliability & durability, identifying buyer considerations/ preferences etc. Extensive & efficient dealership network: larger penetration to serve buyer at all possible market points. Superior service: enhancing the concept of product/service over time both by capturing the market expectations and analyzing the market trends. Full-line strategy: provide wide range of products/ services to provide a one-stop shopping. Feedbacks: prompt responses at regular intervals to gauge the direction of performance.
Strategies of Market Leader: 2. Defending the Market Share
Defending market share
RESPONSIVE MARKETING
Concentrate on Stated/explicit needs and serve accordingly
e.g. pdt. categories like milk, commodities like sugar, salt etc.
cont
Satisfying
customer needs
CREATIVE MARKETING
Discovers & produces pdt./ service solutions, to which customer likely to response positively
e.g. Sony introduced many pdts. like Walkmans, VCRs, Videocameras, and CDs.
ANTICIPATED MARKETING
Predicting the future probable needs of the customers
e.g. HLLs toothpastes based on research on herbal, salts and other natural ingredients, & Nokia mobile phones etc.
Defense Strategies
Market leader uses the strategies to:
reduce the probability of present or
future attack. divert attacks to less threatening areas. lessen the intensity of competition.
Defense Strategies
(2) Flank defense
(3) Preemptive
defense
Attacker
(4) Counteroffensive defense
(1) Position defense Defender
(6) Contraction defense
(5) Mobile defense
Six Defensive Strategies
Position Defense: building superior brand power and making the name unique in the market. e.g. Nescaf. Flank Defense: to protect a weak front or use as counterattack. e.g. HLLs Surf Excel powder price hike from Rs. 19 to Rs. 20 to consolidate the position in detergent market specially against small players in the Indian marketprotect and leverage brand identity. Preemptive Defense: Attack before the competitor starts its offense. e.g. ICICI Banks ATM networks and core banking across branches keep their local and regional banks competition on check, and Microsofts preannouncement approach on new software launch in future force smaller firms to concentrate on other segments.
Six Defensive Strategies
cont
Counter-offensive Defense: Attack the competitor from front or protect the weak front (Flank attack). e.g. US Automobile companies often launch a counteroffensive attack against Japanese counterparts in their markets for the disturbances that had been created by them in US market. Mobile Defense: Market leader stretches/ leverage its strengths into new sales territories can serve for future centers for defense & offense market broadening like Reliance from Petroleum into Energy (using R&D for Oil, coal, hydroelectric and chemicals), and market diversification like ITC from Cigarettes into e-choupals, garments etc. Contraction Defense: When it is difficult to defend the old territories, leader go for planned contraction (strategic withdrawal) giving up weaker/ unprofitable territories and reassigning resources to stronger territories - like US companies relocating their operations from Europe to emerging economies like India & China.
Major Strategic ObjectivesMarket Challenger
Firms attack the leader to grab further market share - South Korean companies like LG (TV and AC markets), Hyundai, Samsung etc. Out-innovate the leader across the segments - Xerox took copier market from 3M by providing better copier solutions, later Canon grab share of Xerox by introducing desk copiers.
Attack Strategies
(4) Bypass attack (2) Flank attack Attacker (1) Frontal attack (3) Encirclement attack (5) Guerilla attack
Defender
Attacking Strategies
Frontal Attack: attacker concentrate on leaders product ranges, advertising, price & distribution like Pepsi-Coca Cola, HLL-P&G. Flank Attack: Hit competitors weak front at two strategic dimensions geographic and segmental. Geographical like IBMs rival Honeywell set-up sales branches in smaller cities, that were not targeted by IBM. Segmental like Japanese automobile co.s did against US auto makers by developing fuel-efficient cars.
Attacking Strategies
cont
Bypass Attack: Indirect assault strategy bypass the rival and attack the easier markets to broaden the resource base and share the risk. Can be done through:
Diversifying into unrelated product categories Diversifying into new geographical areas Launch new technologies to enhance existing products
e.g. Pepsi used bypass strategy against Coke by:
Purchasing the Orange juice giant Tropicana for $3.3 billion in 1998 which is double the market share of Coca Colas Minute Maid. Acquired The Quaker Oats Co. for $14 billion in 2000 Gatorade thirst quenchers (health drink) captured huge share from Coca Colas Powerade.
Attacking Strategies
cont
Encirclement Attack: Capture large proportion of leaders share by launching massive offensive attack on several fronts. Use when challenger commands superior resources/ coverage. Mohans against Kelloggs Cornflakes in India based on price points and distribution coverage from groceries to organised chains. Guerrilla Attack: Launching small and irregular attacks to make competitor tired to secure permanent foothold in the market by both conventional & unconventional means like price cuts, intensive promotions etc. e.g. small Generic players against the Ethical drug manufacturers.
Specific Attack Strategies
Price-discount Super Bazar vs. Big Bazar daily price offers across categories. Cheaper goods/ services (low quality) Nirma, SpiceJet & IndiGo. Value priced goods/services Nirmas Nima soap, Subhiksha, Air Deccan. Prestige goods (high quality-premium price) Samsung India launch Plasma TVs to attack the Sonys markets. Product proliferation (large pdt. variety more choice) Asian Paints against ICI paints. Product innovation 3M entered new markets through breakthrough technologies into their product ranges.
Specific Attack Strategies cont
Improved services ICICI Bank offers better ATM and core Banking coverage against HSBC in India. Distribution innovation Dell vs. other traditional rivals like Compaq, HP, and IBM.
Reduced Manufacturing cost US automobile co.s
operations in India to sustain their share in developed
markets like US, Europe.
Intensive advertising promotion Pepsi & Coca Cola
wars.
Market Follower Strategies
Four broad strategies adopted are: Counterfeiter: Duplicated leaders products and sell in the parallel or grey market like general generic drugs, Chinas toy manufacturers. Cloner: Use the leaders products, name, packaging with slight variations like electric fittings, pipe fittings at local markets. Imitator: copy few things but also maintains differentiation in packaging, promotions, & pricing like Domino Pizza vs. Pizza Hut. Adapter: Adapt with better offer or improved version of leaders products launch in the same or different markets Kissan vs. Maggis Tomato Ketchup.
Nichemanship
End-user specialist (price premiums earned by retailers like Pantaloons and similar others) Vertical-level specialist (chemical or drug companies) Customer-size specialist (M80 mopeds in rural India being neglected by big players) Specific-customer specialist (BHEL, Crompton Ltd) Geographic specialist (Wagh Wakri tea in Gujarat)
Nichemanship
Parker)
cont
Product or product-line specialist (Levis, Peter England,
Product-feature specialist (few Insurance Co. only cover
Marine insurance)
Job-shop specialist (customised) (Dell, 7-Elevens)
Quality-price specialist (HP, Apple high quality & high price computer systems & peripherals) Service specialist (Banks having -evening branches) Channel specialist (Nikes & Addidas exclusive outlets)
Balance b/w Customers & Competitors
Customer
+ Identify opportunities + Long-run profit + Emerging needs & groups
Competition
+ Fighter orientation + Alert against future moves + Exploit weaknesses - Reactive
Developing Competitive Marketing Strategies
Basic Competitive Strategies
Overall Cost Leadership
Focus Middle of the Road
Differentiation
Developing Competitive Marketing Strategies
Balancing Customer and Competitor Orientations
Customer-Centered No Competition-Centered No Yes
Product Orientation Competitor Orientation
Customer Orientation
Yes
Market Orientation
SWOT ANALYSIS