| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rob Tester" <robtester(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Trouble returning a text field from an SRF |
| Date: | 2007-05-14 21:00:36 |
| Message-ID: | 29473.1179176436@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
"Rob Tester" <robtester(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I created my tuple that way and set the Datum using
> DirectFunctionCall1(...), but there still seems to be a limitation at 65535
> chars for the data. When my string is 65535 (or shorter) I get the text
> back. When it is longer I get nothing for the string, but the rest of the
> tuple is intact.
Maybe the problem is on the client side? There's no visible restriction
in the code you quoted (though I am wondering a bit about what "wktStr"
is, and whether you've computed the required size of textOut correctly).
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Tester | 2007-05-14 21:23:41 | Re: Trouble returning a text field from an SRF |
| Previous Message | Rob Tester | 2007-05-14 20:47:52 | Re: Trouble returning a text field from an SRF |