| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PQprepare question |
| Date: | 2007-05-11 13:52:55 |
| Message-ID: | 18665.1178891575@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:08:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's an operator name.
> Ah, didn't notice. But that means that ecpg should not accept "?" as
> placeholder either as this is prone to give errors depending on the
> usage right?
I'd vote that way if you haven't accepted it in the past. Otherwise
you'll need some kind of compromise for backward compatibility ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Tester | 2007-05-12 01:34:20 | Help with returning a tuple |
| Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2007-05-11 13:48:17 | Re: PQprepare question |