The greenhouse gas abatement costs for two forest restoration methods — natural regeneration and plantations — are estimated by integrating observations on the costs of reforestation projects with other biophysical and economic data. This analysis reveals that a mix of reforestation methods offers greater potential to mitigate climate change at low cost than previously estimated.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022). A synthesis report in which the costs and potential of 43 mitigation options are compared in Fig. SPM.7.
Aronson, J., Goodwin, N., Orlando, L., Eisenber, C. & Cross, A. T. A world of possibilities: six restoration strategies to support the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Restorat. Ecol. 28, 730–736 (2020). This paper describes the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
Goymer, P. A trillion trees. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 208–209 (2018). This feature article describes the Trillion Trees initiative.
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A. & Koch, A. Restoring natural forest is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature 568, 25–28 (2019). This paper compares the role of natural forest regeneration and plantations within national climate pledges.
Busch, J. et al. Low-cost opportunities for carbon dioxide removal through tropical reforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 463–466 (2019). This paper compares marginal abatement cost curves for reforestation and avoided deforestation.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This is a summary of: Busch, J. et al. Cost-effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02068-1 (2024).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
A mix of reforestation methods offers more cost-effective climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 903–904 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02081-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02081-4
