Abstract
Chemical inducers of apoptosis have been utilized for decades as tools to uncover steps of the apoptotic cascade and to treat various diseases, most notably cancer. While there are several useful compounds available, limitations in potency, universality, or speed of cell death of these pro-apoptotic agents have meant that no single compound is suitable for all (or most) purposes. Raptinal is a recently described small molecule that induces intrinsic pathway apoptosis rapidly and reliably, and consequently, has been utilized in cell culture and whole organisms for a wide range of biological studies. Its distinct mechanism of action complements the current arsenal of cytotoxic compounds, making it useful as a probe for the apoptosis pathway and other cellular processes. The rapid induction of cell death by Raptinal and its widespread commercial availability make it the pro-apoptotic agent of choice for many applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
Raptinal is a rapid-acting and potent inducer of apoptosis that serves as a unique tool in the study cell death pathways.
-
In some contexts, Raptinal can also promote pyroptosis through a caspase-3 and GSDME dependent mechanism.
-
Raptinal is tolerated in murine tumor models and shows some efficacy at reducing tumor burden.
Open questions
-
What is the direct molecular target of Raptinal?
-
Can the potency of Raptinal be leveraged in a selective manner for cancer treatment?
-
Could structural modifications of Raptinal tune out its inhibition of Pannexin-1 activity?
Introduction
Apoptosis is a mechanism of regulated cell death that is phenotypically characterized by chromatin condensation, breakdown of multiple cellular structures, membrane blebbing, and formation of apoptotic bodies that are subsequently cleared by phagocytosis [1,2,3]; its initiation is divided into intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. The extrinsic pathway is triggered by external signals binding to death receptors, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) binding to the TNF receptor or Fas ligand binding to Fas [3], triggering recruitment of several proteins that lead to formation of active caspase-8 and downstream activation of executioner caspase-3 and -7 from their pro-enzyme forms (Fig. 1) [1, 3]. In contrast, the intrinsic pathway senses perturbations within the cell such as DNA damage or lack of important nutrients or growth factors, but their signals still ultimately lead to activation of executioner caspase-3 and -7. B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) family proteins play an important regulatory role in intrinsic apoptosis and include both pro-apoptotic (e.g. BH3-only, BAX, BAK, BOK) and anti-apoptotic (e.g. Bcl-2) members. Bcl-2 and BH3-only respond to various internal stimuli and are anti- and pro-apoptotic regulators (respectively) of BAX and BAK. BAX/BAK/BOK oligomerization and migration to the mitochondrial membrane leads to mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), cytochrome c release, and subsequent formation of the apoptosome. The apoptosome activates procaspase-9, which is then responsible for activating executioner caspase-3 and -7 from their pro-enzyme forms [1,2,3]. In both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, activation of procaspase-3 and -7 to caspase-3 and -7 leads to cleavage of scores of proteins, resulting in the observed apoptotic phenotypes [2, 4,5,6]. Key features of the apoptotic pathway are shown in Fig. 1, and the detailed mechanism of apoptosis has been comprehensively reviewed [3, 7,8,9].
From the late 1800s to mid-1900s, morphological features of what is now known as apoptosis were observed via microscopy and other imaging techniques [2, 10]. Early studies aimed at elucidating mechanistic details of this pathway relied heavily on biological methods involving gene expression, cloning, and others [10,11,12]. These initial experiments capitalized on instances of natural cell death and tracked the morphological changes it entails, but as the field advanced, the ability to reproducibly induce apoptosis became essential. As such, the induction of apoptosis by addition or removal of needed nutrients or signaling molecules was common; for example, the removal of interleukin-3 (IL-3) in IL-3 dependent cells drove early discoveries on the roles of Bcl-2 [13] and its effector protein BAX [14] in the signaling cascade, while addition of toxic levels of dATP was used to elucidate the roles of cytochrome c and apoptosome assembly in apoptosis [15,16,17]. Furthermore, apoptosis triggered by UV irradiation was utilized in the discovery of other important apoptosis regulators, such as smac/DIABLO [18, 19], and larger molecules that activate the extrinsic apoptosis pathway, such as TNFα and anti-Fas antibodies, were leveraged when studying caspase-3-activated substrates [20, 21].
Beyond the previously mentioned approaches, small molecule inducers and inhibitors of apoptosis [22,23,24] (and other cell death pathways [9, 25,26,27,28]) have emerged as vital tools for understanding the mechanistic intricacies and translational potentials of the apoptotic pathway. Methotrexate and staurosporine were early apoptosis-inducing stressors used to show that Bcl-2 could protect cells from apoptosis [29,30,31], and many other compounds have been instrumental in foundational discoveries about this mode of cell death, with some advancing to the clinic for treating cancer, such as the BH3-mimetic venetoclax [23, 24, 32]. Unsurprisingly, some of the faster-acting compounds like staurosporine and doxorubicin became standard agents for inducing apoptosis [22, 33]. While all of these compounds (Table 1) have been valuable, they are often limited by potency, rate of cell death, or mechanistic targets.
Since its discovery in 2015 [34], the small molecule Raptinal has been widely used for rapid and reliable induction of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, both in cell culture and in whole organisms. Raptinal rapidly induces MOMP, initiating intrinsic apoptosis downstream of BAX/BAK/BOK [35], and has been leveraged in many studies of the apoptotic pathway. Raptinal has also gained utility in the study of pyroptosis due to its integral role in the discovery of caspase-3 mediated and gasdermin-E (GSDME) dependent pyroptosis [36]. This review summarizes current literature on Raptinal’s mechanism of action, its utilization in cell death research, and preliminary insights into its translational potential. Papers utilizing Raptinal are being published at a rapid rate; this review covers publications available through June 2024.
Raptinal mechanism of action – induction of apoptosis
Raptinal, which exists in the dialdehyde form as a solid but is rapidly hydrated in solution (Fig. 2A) [34], has been shown to induce apoptotic cell death across a wide variety of cell types as assessed by a combination of morphological studies and classical markers for apoptosis, such as annexin-V and propidium iodide staining by flow cytometry and caspase-3/7 activation/inhibition assays [34]. To date, there are four major reports with detailed explorations of the mechanism of action (MOA) of Raptinal [34,35,36,37]. Raptinal was found to induce apoptosis more rapidly in U-937 cells than a battery of other prominent apoptosis-inducing and anticancer compounds in head-to-head experiments (Fig. 2B) [34], suggesting a different MOA from these other compounds. Initial examination of the MOA revealed that Raptinal treatment of U-937 cells led to rapid release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria and activation of procaspase-9 and -3, and protection from cell death was afforded by the pan-caspase inhibitor QVD-OPh [34] or zVAD-fmk [35].
These results indicate that Raptinal induces intrinsic apoptosis, and in support of this, siRNA knockdown of key genes encoding intrinsic apoptotic proteins reduced sensitivity to Raptinal [34]. In a siRNA screen, knockdown of mRNA encoding apoptosis activating factor 1 (APAF1), CASP3, and CASP9 afforded protection from Raptinal-induced cell death at short timepoints [34, 38]. These unbiased knockdown studies provide strong support for intrinsic apoptotic induction by Raptinal.
Commonly used pro-apoptotic agents affect vital cellular processes, ultimately leading to apoptotic cell death. For example, staurosporine inhibits multiple kinases leading to the induction of apoptosis, and doxorubicin intercalates DNA, inhibiting topoisomerase II and leading to DNA damage which triggers the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. In contrast to these compounds, Raptinal has been shown to act downstream of BAX/BAK/BOK in the apoptotic pathway to elicit cell death [35]. Raptinal treatment of HCT116 cells led to MOMP and cytochrome c release in both wildtype and BAX knockout cells (Fig. 2C) [35]. Accordingly, Raptinal-induced activation of caspases is not altered by BAX knockout or BAX/BAK double knockout as would be expected if Raptinal was triggering apoptosis upstream of BAX/BAK activity (Fig. 2D) [35]. While Raptinal leads to cytochrome c release independent of BAX/BAK in whole cell studies, it does not lead to cytochrome c release from isolated mitochondria; other apoptosis inducers (such as the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bid) are able to elicit cytochrome c release in isolated mitochondria [34]. The mechanism of Raptinal-induced MOMP and the exact molecular target of Raptinal is still unknown, as discussed in Future Directions.
Raptinal as a tool compound in the study of apoptosis
Given its ability to quickly induce apoptotic death in a variety of cell types, its distinct MOA compared to other common pro-apoptotic compounds, and its commercial availability from multiple vendors, Raptinal use as a tool compound has been increasing rapidly. Raptinal has been instrumental in advancing the understanding of apoptosis, exploring cancer biology, and providing a reliable means for quantitative induction of cell death [39,40,41,42,43,44]. In addition to using Raptinal to learn more about apoptosis, it has also been an important tool in the study of other mechanisms of cell death such as pyroptosis [36, 45,46,47,48], necrosis [49, 50], and ferroptosis [51]. With Raptinal utilized in over 100 publications, it is impractical to cover everything herein; illustrative examples have been selected where Raptinal has been used in a variety of circumstances.
Raptinal as a tool in cell death assays
The ability of Raptinal to induce cell death rapidly and quantitatively makes it an ideal control in cell death assays. Raptinal has found general utility as a positive control for cell death in cytotoxicity assays [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. In addition to controls for general cell death, Raptinal has been widely used as a positive control for apoptotic cell death, particularly in quantifying relative caspase activation [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. Given the recent literature on Raptinal-induced pyroptosis (described further below), Raptinal has also been used as a positive control for pyroptotic cell death [79,80,81,82], and in multiple other circumstances [83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90].
Raptinal as a tool for exploring the apoptotic cell death pathway
To better understand apoptotic signaling events, it is helpful to have a means to isolate different steps within that pathway. Raptinal’s ability to induce MOMP and cytochrome c release has aided investigations designed to tease apart actions upstream and downstream of these events. For instance, inactive BAX is located in the cytoplasm and associated with Hsp70 and other proteins, but activated BAX dissociates and migrates to the mitochondria (Fig. 3A) [91]. Various stressors, such as ER stress and lysosomal damage, can affect BAX’s dissociation from Hsp70 [91]. As Raptinal acts downstream of BAX, Raptinal treatment demonstrated that disrupting mitochondrial function does not directly contribute to BAX’s dissociation from Hsp70 (Fig. 3B, C) [91]. Other apoptotic inducers, such as the BH3-mimetic navitoclax, are known to activate BAX upstream of MOMP (Fig. 3D) [92] and, therefore, could not be utilized to determine if mitochondrial damage affected BAX’s association with Hsp70.
The BAX/BAK independence of Raptinal-induced cell death has also been useful in probing how Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is involved in determining whether mitochondrial damage leads to the induction of apoptosis or if the damaged mitochondria are simply degraded [93]. Raptinal’s BAX/BAK independence was also important in the investigation of inflammatory responses within the cell that are triggered by MOMP [94]. In another study, Raptinal was employed to elucidate how MOMP alters the feedback between mRNA decay and transcription during apoptosis [95]. By inducing and protecting from apoptosis at various points along the pathway, MOMP was found to be a critical step in causing RNA polymerase II activity to decrease in response to mRNA decay, whereas RNA polymerase II activity would typically increase in response to mRNA decay in healthy cells [95]. Additionally, the structural roles and apoptotic functions of RTN4, CLIMP-63, and DRP1 were probed using BH3 mimetics and Raptinal to help decipher which proteins are critical upstream vs downstream of BAK activation [96]. Raptinal co-dosed with caspase inhibitors allows for ‘isolation’ of this part of the pathway, with cytochrome c release from the mitochondria isolated both from the activation of upstream proteins and from downstream apoptosis (Fig. 4). In one study, Raptinal co-treatment with the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk was used to discover the role of centrosomal protein 131 in mitochondrial homeostasis such that its genetic deletion made the mitochondria more resistant to permeabilization [97]. Treatment with Raptinal and z-VAD-fmk allowed the initial MOMP to be studied without additional mitochondrial permeabilization that occurs due to caspase activation in a positive feedback loop [97]. Thus, with this co-dosing, MOMP and cytochrome c release can be studied independent of the rest of the apoptotic pathway.
Raptinal as a tool compound in cancer research
In addition to learning more about apoptosis itself, discoveries utilizing Raptinal have important implications in cancer research. A hallmark of cancer is the evasion of apoptosis [98,99,100]; thus, a better understanding of apoptosis and cell death can inform treatment. For example, the Warburg effect is an important concept in cancer biology, whereby cancer cells meet their high energy demands by generating ATP quickly through glycolysis and lactic acid fermentation instead of the more efficient route through the citric acid cycle and electron transport chain; this “Warburg effect” can be correlated with resistance to chemotherapy [101, 102]. To corroborate this, it was shown that while HepG2 cells in fresh media are sensitive to Raptinal, cells that are treated in “conditioned media” (media containing supernatant from other growing HepG2 cells) are no longer susceptible to Raptinal (Fig. 5A) [103]. This resistance correlates with the lactate to pyruvate ratio that is altered due to the Warburg effect (Fig. 5B) [103]. The lactate/pyruvate ratio, which is in equilibrium with the NADH/NAD+ ratio, affects the activity of c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK), a protein that acts downstream of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promotes expression of apoptotic genes and activation of several BCL-2 proteins [103]. Accordingly, HepG2 cells treated with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 are less susceptible to Raptinal [103]. Thus, developing therapies to correct the lactate/pyruvate ratio in tumors may sensitize resistant cancer cells to pro-apoptotic compounds.
In cancer treatment, it is common that insufficient eradication of the tumor cells by a chemotherapeutic drug leads to regrowth of a more resistant tumor. There are many mechanisms that prevent quantitative cell death induction, such as genetic mutations or upregulation of protective proteins that give a survival advantage to the cells [23]. Recently, it has been shown that when persister cells are generated in the laboratory through sublethal treatment by BH3 mimetics and inoculated into mice, the resulting tumors are more resistant to apoptosis and more likely to metastasize [104]. Persister cells were also able to be generated by sub-lethal treatment of Raptinal, independent of BAX, BAK, and BOK activation and independent of caspase activation. Since Raptinal bypasses BAX, BAK, and BOK in its induction of cell death, they were able to determine that these proteins were not necessary in the development of persistence, but that MOMP and cytochrome c release were the critical steps due to the resulting increase in expression of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) which triggers various pro-survival mechanisms (Fig. 5C, D) [104]. Thus, through this study Raptinal helped uncover new potential targets for reversing persister cells in cancer treatments.
Raptinal’s applications beyond 2D cell culture
While this review has thus far highlighted Raptinal’s utility in 2D cell culture systems, Raptinal has been utilized in other settings as well. Its ability to rapidly induce cell death was utilized in creating scaffolds of extracellular matrices for astrocyte migration assays [105]. Here cells were induced to generate large quantities of extracellular matrix and treated with Raptinal to kill the cells, leaving just the scaffold for further experiments [105]. Raptinal also has proven to be relevant in the study of multicellular systems. Raptinal aided in elucidating the role of epithelial-like cells in the early embryo, where the epithelial cells were able to phagocytize apoptotic cells killed by Raptinal [106]. This study demonstrated Raptinal’s utility in killing cells from both zebrafish and murine embryos [106]. Elsewhere, Raptinal has been shown to induce apoptosis in zebrafish and to be effective in treating murine tumors [34]. The in vivo efficacy of Raptinal will be discussed further in the section on Raptinal’s translational potential.
Raptinal compared to other pro-apoptotic tool compounds
Apoptosis is a natural means for the body to clear out cells that are damaged or those that are no longer needed during certain stages of development, and as such, cells possess many sentinels for detecting this damage. Staurosporine is a non-specific kinase inhibitor that has been heavily used for inducing apoptosis in cell culture but has not been suitable for clinical use [107]. For many apoptosis inducers approved for cancer treatment and used in the laboratory, such as doxorubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin, DNA damage is an integral part of triggering apoptosis. By binding DNA and topoisomerase II, etoposide inhibits the ability of topoisomerase II to ligate DNA after detangling its strands [108, 109]. Doxorubicin intercalates with DNA, leading to topoisomerase II inhibition, and doxorubicin can produce further cell damage through generation of ROS [108, 110]. Cisplatin binds DNA, causing damage and interfering with DNA repair, and cisplatin may lead to generation of damaging free radicals [111]. If the cell senses an overwhelming amount of damage, apoptosis will be induced upstream of the Bcl-2 proteins [112]. Guided by knowledge of the apoptosis pathway, BH3-mimetics such as navitoclax and obatoclax have been developed to interfere directly with the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 members and bypass upstream damage sensors that funnel into the apoptotic cascade [32, 113]. Looking further down the apoptosis pathway, PAC-1 is a clinical drug candidate that activates procaspase-3 to caspase-3 [73, 114,115,116]. PAC-1 has therefore been useful for probing late stages of the apoptotic pathway [34, 51, 117,118,119,120,121]. As demonstrated in the section Raptinal as a tool compound in the study of apoptosis, Raptinal has proven to be a useful chemical tool to induce apoptosis downstream of BAX/BAK but still achieve MOMP. Thus, it is a mechanistically distinct addition to the arsenal of apoptosis inducers (Fig. 6).
Raptinal’s mechanism of action remains distinct from other pro-apoptotic compounds that target the mitochondria. The Hsp70 inhibitor apoptozole (Az) was derivatized to include the mitochondria-targeting triphenylphosphonium (TPP) motif to generate the compound Az-TPP-O3 [122]. Az-TPP-O3 disrupts the binding of the Hsp70 mortalin with p53, and p53 mediated MOMP via BAK. Thus, while AzTPP-O3 is able to act directly within the mitochondria, it is still BAK dependent, unlike Raptinal. Cytotoxicity assays show that 72 h IC50 values for Az-TPP-O3 are comparable to 24 h IC50 values for Raptinal. Az-TPP-O3 treatment of HeLa, MIA-Paca2, and HL60 cells for 72 h produced IC50 values of 0.61, 0.86, and 0.48 μM respectively [122]. In the same cell lines, Raptinal 24 h treatment yields IC50 values of 0.6, 1.9, and 2.1 μM, respectively, suggesting approximately equal potency [34]. While Az-TPP-O3 time to cell death was not analyzed, flow cytometry analysis of annexin-V and propidium iodide staining was performed using an 18 h incubation at 2 μM. While this is a longer incubation time than is typically seen in Raptinal assays, it is also a lower compound concentration, and more direct comparisons are needed.
Raptinal stands out among other apoptosis inducers for its accessibility and ability to rapidly induce cell death. Raptinal is commercially available and can be synthesized on a multi-gram scale [34], and its rate of cell death induction makes it a time-efficient control, where cell death can be achieved at a faster rate than even staurosporine and doxorubicin [34]. Thus, Raptinal rounds out the apoptotic arsenal in terms of both mechanism and speed. Other established pro-apoptotic compounds can be leveraged in instances requiring longer time to cell death, such as monitoring the effect of the apoptotic pathway on other cellular processes or for tailoring the cell death control to act in a similar mechanism or on a similar timescale as an experimental compound. Meanwhile, Raptinal is unique in its ability to bypass BAX/BAK/BOK in intrinsic apoptosis, and useful as a control when efficient cell death is required. For further examples:
-
Raptinal’s speed of cell death compared to other compounds has also been described in HOS, H1993, SK-MEL-5, Mia PaCa-2, and ES-2 cell lines [34, 51]. In a head-to-head comparison of 10 μM compound treatment of U-937 cells, Raptinal’s time to 50% cell death was only 1.5 h while other fast-acting apoptotic inducers such as staurosporine, etoposide, and doxorubicin required 5 h, 5 h, and 6 h, respectively [34].
-
While studying apoptosis induced by H. pylori, achieving similar levels of caspase-3 cleavage in gastric epithelial cell lines required 24 h incubation with cisplatin but only 2 h with Raptinal (both at 10 μM); understandably, Raptinal was used throughout the remaining experiments [39].
-
Raptinal’s superior speed was also apparent in experiments demonstrating that cell death from Yersinia infection is distinct from canonical apoptosis [40]. Here, Raptinal was shown to kill at a similar timescale to the test compound; etoposide at a 15X higher concentration than Raptinal required an additional 16 h incubation to reach the desired endpoint [40].
-
Raptinal killed on a similar timescale to experimental studies of nigericin treatment of casp1 deficient BMDCs; whereas doxorubicin required several more hours [123].
-
In a paper studying nuclear expulsion during cell death, it takes staurosporine 25 h to reach the same level of chromatin expansion that Raptinal displays in 5 h, and Raptinal is used throughout many of their experiments [124].
-
A study of Hippo kinases shows the importance of MST1 and MST2 in PARP-1 and caspase-3 activation by low concentrations of staurosporine and Raptinal. Western blots compare 3 h Raptinal treatment (3 μM and 10 μM) with 4 h staurosporine (0.5 μM and 2 μM). Variations in timing and dosing limit comparisons; nevertheless, testing both Raptinal and staurosporine as unique inducers of apoptosis validates the study’s findings [125].
-
Comparing to another compound that targets the mitochondria, caspase activation and cell death are achieved quicker with Raptinal than the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone [34, 48].
Assays with Raptinal typically utilize relatively low concentrations, with 10 μM or lower being common. Cytotoxicity of Raptinal has been recorded on short timescales, with 24 h IC50 values in the single-digit micromolar range [34, 126]. There is limited head-to-head comparisons of Raptinal with other compounds, but for a general comparison across different publications, 24 h treatment of HeLa cells with Raptinal [34], doxorubicin [127], and cisplatin [127] yield IC50 values of 0.6, 1.7, and 77.4 μM, respectively. HepG2 cells treated with Raptinal [126], doxorubicin [128], and 5-flourouricil [126] yield IC50 values of 0.62, 11.1, and >100 μM, respectively. The relative potency of drugs is not always realized at 24 h, such as 5-fluororicil (which partially relies on DNA repair mechanisms), so it is hard to conclude how Raptinal compares on longer time scales. However, given its single-micromolar 24 h IC50 values, Raptinal is equally if not more potent than many other apoptotic inducers.
Raptinal mechanism of action – beyond apoptosis
Inhibition of PANX1 activity
As mentioned previously, phenotypic characteristics of apoptosis include membrane blebbing and the formation of apoptotic bodies. These phenotypes are particularly notable and rapidly appear in U-937 cells treated with Raptinal (Fig. 7A). Considering this, a recent study uncovered a novel role of Raptinal as an inhibitor of the activity of the cell membrane channel Pannexin 1 (PANX1), and Raptinal treatment resembled cotreatment of apoptosis inducers and PANX1 inhibitors in several cell lines [37]. PANX1 is a substrate of caspase-3 and allows the bidirectional flow of small molecules and metabolites, such as ATP, into and out of the cell. Additionally, PANX1 allows the uptake of dyes such as TO-PRO-3, which is leveraged in flow cytometry staining for cell viability. Raptinal treatment prevents the flow of these molecules through PANX1 channels; this result stands in contrast to the effect of other apoptosis inducers including anti-FAS, UV irradiation, and the BH3-mimetic combination ABT-737/S6 (Fig. 7B, C). PANX1 has an inhibitory effect on the formation of apoptotic bodies, and it was found that Raptinal’s inhibition of PANX1 activity promotes apoptotic body formation. While addition of a PANX1 inhibitor (trovafloxacin) increases the apoptotic body formation in cells treated with other apoptosis inducers, the formation of these structures was not augmented in the treatment with Raptinal and PANX1 inhibitor (Fig. 7D). Instead, Raptinal alone resembled the cotreatment of the other apoptotic compounds with the PANX1 inhibitor. In efforts to separate the proapoptotic effects of Raptinal from its inhibition of PANX1 activity, PANX1 was expressed in Hek293T cells with the caspase-3 cleavage site exchanged for a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site. This allowed activation of PANX1 while simultaneously inhibiting caspase activity via Q-VD-OPh, and it demonstrated the effect of Raptinal on PANX1 activity was independent of its ability to induce apoptosis [37]. While this work established the inhibition of PANX1 activity by Raptinal, the exact mechanism of this inhibition has not been elucidated. The mechanism seems to be distinct from other PANX1 inhibitors, such as carbenoxolone and trovafloxacin, which act quickly to inhibit and can be washed out to restore PANX1 activity. Inability to wash out Raptinal and regain PANX1 activity may suggest covalent binding, and delay in PANX1 inhibition by Raptinal may suggest either a metabolite of Raptinal is responsible or that Raptinal acts on an intermediate target that can then inhibit PANX1 [37]. Regardless of the exact mechanism, Raptinal induces apoptosis by inducing MOMP and inhibits the activity of PANX1 (Fig. 7E).
Caspase-independent cell death induced by Raptinal
The initial studies of Raptinal’s MOA [34, 35] and subsequent experiments utilizing Raptinal establish apoptosis as the primary mode of cell death induced by Raptinal. However, it was also shown that Raptinal’s disruption of general mitochondrial function due to MOMP causes cell death in a caspase-independent manner [35]. Caspase-9 knockout protects from cell death at short timepoints, but at longer timepoints it is unable to protect from cell death (Fig. 8A) [35]. As expected, BAX/BAK DKO had no effect on Raptinal cytotoxicity in both the short and long incubations. These experiments suggest that general disruption of mitochondrial activity by Raptinal can be enough to induce cell death at longer time points through a caspase-independent mechanism (Fig. 8B) [35].
Pyroptosis induced by Raptinal
There are specific conditions where Raptinal-induced cell death remains caspase dependent yet deviates from apoptosis. Pyroptosis is a lytic form of cell death that typically involves inflammasome activation and release of inflammatory cytokines through pores formed by gasdermin proteins [9, 129]. Raptinal was instrumental in demonstrating that expression levels of gasdermin-E (GSDME) determine if activation of caspase-3 leads to apoptosis or pyroptosis [36]. Cleavage of full-length GSDME allows the N-terminal portion to polymerize to form a pore in the membrane, leading to the immunogenic cell death termed pyroptosis (Fig. 9A) [36]. It was known that granzyme B could cleave GSDME to lead to pyroptosis [46], but this new study revealed that caspase-3 could also cleave GSDME (Fig. 9B) [36]. Cells expressing GSDME and treated with Raptinal also show morphological features of pyroptosis and release LDH (Fig. 9C, D). Thus, in cells expressing high levels of GSDME, Raptinal (and other pro-apoptotic compounds) may also induce death by pyroptosis through the activation of caspase-3 and subsequent cleavage of GSDME.
Raptinal as a tool compound in the study of pyroptosis
The ability of Raptinal to induce pyroptotic cell death in GSDME expressing cells has allowed Raptinal to be used as a tool to further understand pyroptosis. As previously mentioned, the pyroptosis-inducing feature of Raptinal was instrumental in discovering the link between caspase-3 activated GSDME and pyroptosis [36]. Further evaluation of the role of GSDME in pyroptosis used Raptinal in a CRISPR screen for proteins important in Raptinal-induced pyroptosis in HeLa cells, and these experiments identified USP48 as a critical protein to pyroptotic cell death, and its expression correlates with effectiveness of PD-1 therapy, in a manner also dependent on GSDME expression [130].
While there may be immunological benefits of inducing pyroptosis in tumors, GSDME is normally expressed at higher levels in healthy tissue compared to cancer cells, and chemotherapies that kill cancer by apoptosis often have off-target toxicities because activated caspase-3 can cleave GSDME, leading to pyroptosis in healthy cells [131]. Mannose has been shown to reduce off-target toxicities of chemotherapy treatment, demonstrated by its ability to protect A375 cells from Raptinal-induced pyroptosis (Fig. 10A, B) [131]. Raptinal was used to elucidate the mechanism of this protective effect of mannose: activating the AMPK and hexosamine biosynthetic pathway and ultimately leading to higher phosphorylation of GSDME, resulting in the inability of caspase-3 to cleave GSDME and induce pyroptosis [131]. Thus, if a tumor were to be treated by Raptinal or other apoptosis inducer, mannose could be a potential cotreatment to protect healthy cells from undesired pyroptosis while still inducing apoptosis in the tumor.
Recent reports of the more established GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis routes have also benefitted from using Raptinal as an orthogonal inducer of pyroptosis. In innate immune cells, pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs) or other signals activate the inflammasome, which activates caspase-1 and, consequently, GSDMD and cytokines like IL-1β and IL-18; and GSDMD forms the membrane pores responsible for pyroptosis. Irregularities in this pathway can have many implications in immunoinflammatory diseases. In caspase-1 deficient conditions, cell death and release of cytokines is delayed but still observed [123]. While this cell death does involve caspases, it does not elicit morphologically apoptotic cell death phenotypes in comparison to Raptinal and doxorubicin [123]. Thus, in the absence of caspase-1 or GSDMD, there can still be an alternative lytic form of cell death, and any attempts to prevent cell death should aim to prevent inflammasome formation instead of the subsequent diverging pathways [123]. Similarly, it has been shown that when the NLRP3 inflammasome is constitutively active, there is a means of GSDMD independent pyroptosis that (similar to Raptinal-treated cells) instead relies on GSDME-mediated pyroptosis [132]. Since Raptinal can also induce GSDME-mediated pyroptosis, it was a helpful control to study inhibition of pyroptosis in these various contexts.
In addition to its roles in studying apoptosis and pyroptosis, Raptinal has been useful as a control in probing cell death that does not fit neatly into either mode of cell death. It was found that activators of the NLRP3 inflammasome can cause lytic cell death that was not strictly pyroptotic or apoptotic [133]. Elsewhere, while some compounds were found to kill by apoptosis in normoxia but by necrosis in hypoxia, Raptinal served as a control that was apoptotic in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions, though faster in hypoxia [49].
Raptinal’s translational potential
While Raptinal’s translational potential is currently underexplored, this compound may offer some advantage over certain chemotherapies. For instance, if a tumor develops resistance due to some alteration early in the apoptosis pathway, Raptinal may be an option to trigger cell death downstream of these apoptotic defects. Some proapoptotic drugs have limitations in dosing, such as doxorubicin’s cardiotoxicity that limits its cumulative lifetime dose, and developing alternative treatments is essential. Thus far, Raptinal has been shown to have some efficacy in vivo in both a murine melanoma and breast cancer tumor model when dosed 20 mg/kg once daily for 3 or 4 consecutive days [34]. Raptinal was also shown to delay tumor growth and lengthen overall survival in C57BL/6J mice with YUMM1.7 tumors treated with Raptinal at 20 mg/kg (Fig. 11) [36]. There were signs of toxicity as seen by initial weight loss, but this weight was regained after treatment [36]. It should be noted that it is currently unclear if Raptinal can selectively target cancer cells over normal cells; any specificity could become more apparent once the exact molecular target of Raptinal is elucidated.
Raptinal has been radiolabeled by 99mTc so its biodistribution could be tracked in rats and its efficacy observed in an HCC model [126]. Nonspecific protein binding led to high retention in the blood in both healthy rats and those bearing HCC tumors; but there was higher retention in the liver of those bearing an HCC tumor than those without, suggesting a small preference for tumoral tissue [126]. However, labeling Raptinal may disrupt its biodistribution; as such, label-free methods of monitoring the distribution of Raptinal would be ideal. In attempts to gain better selectivity and efficacy, Raptinal silver nanoparticles have also been generated [134]. Treatment shows cell death in HCC tumors and improved liver enzyme levels; however, they do not present data on overall tumor reduction over time [134]. This early work in testing Raptinal in vivo suggests it may find translation applications, but minimizing toxicity will be critical.
Recent advances in targeted drug delivery may prove applicable to Raptinal. Passive targeting using carriers such as nanoparticles or liposomes could be leveraged for their ability to accumulate in tumors over healthy tissue. More selective targeting could employ antibody-drug conjugates to bind specific cells or a prodrug approach where an inactivating group would be cleaved within the cancer cell or tumor microenvironment. Exploring these methods using Raptinal may prove useful in minimizing toxicity.
Evasion of apoptosis is observed in certain autoimmune diseases and viral infections [135, 136]. Accordingly, chemotherapies have been investigated for treating a wide range of autoimmune diseases [137], and Raptinal could be explored as another option. In some cases, viruses may inhibit apoptosis in infected cells, allowing more opportunity for viral replication. For instance, adenovirus infection can involve the expression of the E1A gene to promote DNA replication and the E1B 19K protein to inhibit apoptosis by inhibiting BAX [138]. Thus, if Raptinal could be directed to infected cells, it could bypass the E1B 19K inhibited BAX and be utilized to effectively kill these cells and diminish viral replication. While not for therapeutic benefit, Raptinal was also used in a study exploring contributing factors to postoperative cognitive dysfunction [139]. In this study, it was found that anesthesia and laparotomy in mice activated the cGAS/STING pathway and subsequent caspase-3/GSDME pyroptosis within the hippocampus, leading to poorer performance in cognitive tests. Treatment with a cGAS inhibitor before surgery could reverse these effects, but Raptinal (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection, 30 min before surgery), which can cause GSDME pyroptosis independent of cGAS, reversed the protective effects of the cGAS inhibitor [139]. While treatment with Raptinal was only shown to reduce the protective effects of cGAS inhibitor and implications of single Raptinal treatment are not shown, these results present more off target effects to consider when exploring Raptinal’s translational potential and should be investigated further.
Conclusion and future directions
The ability of Raptinal to rapidly induce MOMP and release of cytochrome c downstream of BAX/BAK activation has made this compound useful in 1) studying specific apoptosis events and, 2) providing a convenient and reliable apoptotic/cell death reference compound. Additionally, the discovery of the ability of caspase-3 to activate GSDME and induce pyroptosis was not only a significant addition to Raptinal’s MOA, but it was also important for fundamental understanding of pyroptosis.
The exact molecular target of Raptinal remains unknown; given its unique rapid-acting phenotype, the target of Raptinal might be expected to be different from other pro-apoptotic compounds. Identification of this target may reveal yet another layer of Raptinal’s MOA and further elucidate mechanistic details of apoptosis. Chemical proteomic techniques could be leveraged to explore Raptinal’s interactions with proteins within the cell. If tolerated sites for modification can be established, probes could be generated for various binding, pulldown, or colocalization assays. To explore the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of Raptinal, some structural modifications have previously been made, but these modifications all led to reduced activity [34]. While modifications of Raptinal’s dialdehyde moiety led to complete loss of activity, minor modifications of the aryl rings were tolerated but did result in compounds with reduced potency. Raptinal’s SAR could also help elucidate mechanisms of inhibition of PANX1 activity, and structural modifications could be assessed based on their potency and selectivity toward inducing apoptosis vs inhibiting PANX1 activity, further enlightening our understanding of Raptinal’s MOA.
The few in vivo studies with Raptinal show that there is promise for leveraging this compound in treating tumors, but further studies on its efficacy and toxicity are needed. The traits that make Raptinal an outstanding tool compound (rapid and quantitative induction of cell death in virtually any cell line) may not bode well for its translational advancement. In this context, methods of targeted drug delivery, such as antibody drug conjugates or direct intratumoral injections, may enable the potency of Raptinal to be harnessed in a more selective manner. Alternatively, further developing mannose (or other compounds) as a protective cotreatment with Raptinal may improve the observed toxicity effects. While the promising results of Raptinal warrant further investigation of its translational potential, there is little question about its importance as a tool in cell death research.
References
Kist M, Vucic D. Cell death pathways: intricate connections and disease implications. EMBO J. 2021;40:e106700.
Kerr JF, Wyllie AH, Currie AR. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 1972;26:239–57.
Nossing C, Ryan KM. 50 years on and still very much alive: ‘Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer. 2023;128:426–31.
Julien O, Wells JA. Caspases and their substrates. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24:1380–9.
Widmann C, Gibson S, Johnson GL. Caspase-dependent cleavage of signaling proteins during apoptosis - A turn-off mechanism for anti-apoptotic signals. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:7141–7.
Araya LE, Soni IV, Hardy JA, Julien O. Deorphanizing Caspase-3 and Caspase-9 Substrates In and Out of Apoptosis with Deep Substrate Profiling. ACS Chem Biol. 2021;16:2280–96.
Elmore S. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35:495–516.
Jan R, Chaudhry GE. Understanding Apoptosis and Apoptotic Pathways Targeted Cancer Therapeutics. Adv Pharm Bull. 2019;9:205–18.
Ai Y, Meng Y, Yan B, Zhou Q, Wang X. The biochemical pathways of apoptotic, necroptotic, pyroptotic, and ferroptotic cell death. Mol Cell. 2024;84:170–9.
Cotter TG. Apoptosis and cancer: the genesis of a research field. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:501–7.
Tsujimoto Y, Finger LR, Yunis J, Nowell PC, Croce CM. Cloning of the chromosome breakpoint of neoplastic B cells with the t(14;18) chromosome translocation. Science. 1984;226:1097–9.
Tsujimoto Y, Croce CM. Analysis of the structure, transcripts, and protein products of bcl-2, the gene involved in human follicular lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:5214–8.
Vaux DL, Cory S, Adams JM. Bcl-2 gene promotes haemopoietic cell survival and cooperates with c-myc to immortalize pre-B cells. Nature. 1988;335:440–2.
Oltvai ZN, Milliman CL, Korsmeyer SJ. Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programmed cell death. Cell. 1993;74:609–19.
Liu X, Kim CN, Yang J, Jemmerson R, Wang X. Induction of apoptotic program in cell-free extracts: requirement for dATP and cytochrome c. Cell. 1996;86:147–57.
Zou H, Henzel WJ, Liu XS, Lutschg A, Wang XD. Apaf-1, a human protein homologous to C-elegans CED-4, participates in cytochrome c-dependent activation of caspase-3. Cell. 1997;90:405–13.
Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Alnemri ES, et al. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell. 1997;91:479–89.
Du CY, Fang M, Li YC, Li L, Wang XD. Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell. 2000;102:33–42.
Verhagen AM, Ekert PG, Pakusch M, Silke J, Connolly LM, Reid GE, et al. Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins. Cell. 2000;102:43–53.
Sahara S, Aoto M, Eguchi Y, Imamoto N, Yoneda Y, Tsujimoto Y. Acinus is a caspase-3-activated protein required for apoptotic chromatin condensation. Nature. 1999;401:168–73.
Coleman ML, Sahai EA, Yeo M, Bosch M, Dewar A, Olson MF. Membrane blebbing during apoptosis results from caspase-mediated activation of ROCK I. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:339–45.
Sritharan S, Sivalingam N. A comprehensive review on time-tested anticancer drug doxorubicin. Life Sci. 2021;278:119527.
Pan ST, Li ZL, He ZX, Qiu JX, Zhou SF. Molecular mechanisms for tumour resistance to chemotherapy. Clin Exp Pharm P. 2016;43:723–37.
Singh P, Lim B. Targeting Apoptosis in Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24:273–84.
Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, Skouta R, Zaitsev EM, Gleason CE, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149:1060–72.
Li J, Cao F, Yin HL, Huang ZJ, Lin ZT, Mao N, et al. Ferroptosis: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:88.
Yang YP, Hu LF, Zheng HF, Mao CJ, Hu WD, Xiong KP, et al. Application and interpretation of current autophagy inhibitors and activators. Acta Pharm Sin. 2013;34:625–35.
Armenta DA, Dixon SJ. Investigating Nonapoptotic Cell Death Using Chemical Biology Approaches. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27:376–86.
Tsujimoto Y. Stress-resistance conferred by high level of bcl-2 alpha protein in human B lymphoblastoid cell. Oncogene 1989;4:1331–6.
Kluck RM, BossyWetzel E, Green DR, Newmeyer DD. The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria: A primary site for Bcl-2 regulation of apoptosis. Science. 1997;275:1132–6.
Raimondi MV, Randazzo O, La Franca M, Barone G, Vignoni E, Rossi D, et al. DHFR Inhibitors: Reading the Past for Discovering Novel Anticancer Agents. Molecules. 2019;24:1140.
Diepstraten ST, Anderson MA, Czabotar PE, Lessene G, Strasser A, Kelly GL. The manipulation of apoptosis for cancer therapy using BH3-mimetic drugs. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:45–64.
Nakano H, Omura S. Chemical biology of natural indolocarbazole products: 30 years since the discovery of staurosporine. J Antibiot. 2009;62:17–26.
Palchaudhuri R, Lambrecht MJ, Botham RC, Partlow KC, van Ham TJ, Putt KS, et al. A Small Molecule that Induces Intrinsic Pathway Apoptosis with Unparalleled Speed. Cell Rep. 2015;13:2027–36.
Heimer S, Knoll G, Schulze-Osthoff K, Ehrenschwender M. Raptinal bypasses BAX, BAK, and BOK for mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization and intrinsic apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:556.
Vernon M, Wilski NA, Kotas D, Cai W, Pomante D, Tiago M, et al. Raptinal Induces Gasdermin E-Dependent Pyroptosis in Naive and Therapy-Resistant Melanoma. Mol Cancer Res. 2022;20:1811–21.
Santavanond JP, Chiu YH, Tixeira R, Liu Z, Yap JKY, Chen KW, et al. The small molecule raptinal can simultaneously induce apoptosis and inhibit PANX1 activity. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15:123.
Haimovich G, Ecker CM, Dunagin MC, Eggan E, Raj A, Gerst JE, et al. Intercellular mRNA trafficking via membrane nanotube-like extensions in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E9873–E82.
Chen Y, Sheppard D, Dong X, Hu X, Chen M, Chen R, et al. H. pylori infection confers resistance to apoptosis via Brd4-dependent BIRC3 eRNA synthesis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:667.
Sarhan J, Liu BC, Muendlein HI, Li P, Nilson R, Tang AY, et al. Caspase-8 induces cleavage of gasdermin D to elicit pyroptosis during Yersinia infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E10888–E97.
Yang NJ, Isensee J, Neel DV, Quadros AU, Zhang HB, Lauzadis J, et al. Anthrax toxins regulate pain signaling and can deliver molecular cargoes into ANTXR2(+) DRG sensory neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2022;25:168–79.
Rybczynska AA, Boersma HH, de Jong S, Gietema JA, Noordzij W, Dierckx R, et al. Avenues to molecular imaging of dying cells: Focus on cancer. Med Res Rev. 2018;38:1713–68.
Weilinger NL, Yang K, Choi HB, Groten CJ, Wendt S, Murugan M, et al. Pannexin-1 opening in neuronal edema causes cell death but also leads to protection via increased microglia contacts. Cell Rep. 2023;42:113128.
Khoubafarin S, Kharel A, Malla S, Nath P, Irving RE, Kaur D, et al. Label-free identification of cell death mechanism using scattering-based microscopy and deep learning. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2023;56:485401.
Orzalli MH, Prochera A, Payne L, Smith A, Garlick JA, Kagan JC. Virus-mediated inactivation of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members promotes Gasdermin-E-dependent pyroptosis in barrier epithelial cells. Immunity. 2021;54:1447–62.e5.
Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Xia S, Kong Q, Li S, Liu X, et al. Gasdermin E suppresses tumour growth by activating anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2020;579:415–20.
Liu Z, Wang C, Lin C. Pyroptosis as a double-edged sword: The pathogenic and therapeutic roles in inflammatory diseases and cancers. Life Sci. 2023;318:121498.
Neel DV, Basu H, Gunner G, Bergstresser MD, Giadone RM, Chung H, et al. Gasdermin-E mediates mitochondrial damage in axons and neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2023;111:1222–40.e9.
Jacobsen KM, Villadsen NL, Torring T, Nielsen CB, Salomon T, Nielsen MM, et al. APD-Containing Cyclolipodepsipeptides Target Mitochondrial Function in Hypoxic Cancer Cells. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25:1337–49.e12.
Ghosh S, Yang R, Duraki D, Zhu J, Kim JE, Jabeen M, et al. Plasma Membrane Channel TRPM4 Mediates Immunogenic Therapy-Induced Necrosis. Cancer Res. 2023;83:3115–30.
Llabani E, Hicklin RW, Lee HY, Motika SE, Crawford LA, Weerapana E, et al. Diverse compounds from pleuromutilin lead to a thioredoxin inhibitor and inducer of ferroptosis. Nat Chem. 2019;11:521–32.
Furiassi L, Tonogai EJ, Hergenrother PJ. Limonin as a Starting Point for the Construction of Compounds with High Scaffold Diversity. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60:16119–28.
Boudreau MW, Mulligan MP, Shapiro DJ, Fan TM, Hergenrother PJ. Activators of the Anticipatory Unfolded Protein Response with Enhanced Selectivity for Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer. J Med Chem. 2022;65:3894–912.
Boyko YD, Huck CJ, Ning S, Shved AS, Yang C, Chu T, et al. Synthetic Studies on Selective, Proapoptotic Isomalabaricane Triterpenoids Aided by Computational Techniques. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:12418-.
Chavez MG, Garcia A, Lee HY, Lau GW, Parker EN, Komnick KE, et al. Synthesis of Fusidic Acid Derivatives Yields a Potent Antibiotic with an Improved Resistance Profile. Acs Infect Dis. 2021;7:493–505.
Haffez H, Osman S, Ebrahim HY, Hassan ZA. Growth Inhibition and Apoptotic Effect of Pine Extract and Abietic Acid on MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells via Alteration of Multiple Gene Expressions Using In Vitro Approach. Molecules. 2022;27:293.
Peh J, Boudreau MW, Smith HM, Hergenrother PJ. Overcoming Resistance to Targeted Anticancer Therapies through Small-Molecule-Mediated MEK Degradation. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25:996-+.
Polidore ALA, Furiassi L, Hergenrother PJ, Metcalf WW. A Phosphonate Natural Product Made by Pantoea ananatis is Necessary and Sufficient for the Hallmark Lesions of Onion Center Rot. Mbio. 2021;12:e03402–20.
Parker EN, Drown BS, Geddes EJ, Lee HY, Ismail N, Lau GW, et al. Implementation of permeation rules leads to a FabI inhibitor with activity against Gram-negative pathogens. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:67-+.
Svec RL, McKee SA, Berry MR, Kelly AM, Fan TM, Hergenrother PJ. Novel Imidazotetrazine Evades Known Resistance Mechanisms and Is Effective against Temozolomide-Resistant Brain Cancer in Cell Culture. ACS Chem Biol. 2022;17:299–313.
Munoz KA, Ulrich RJ, Vasan AK, Sinclair M, Wen PC, Holmes JR, et al. A Gram-negative-selective antibiotic that spares the gut microbiome. Nature. 2024;630:429–36.
Thotamune W, Ubeysinghe S, Shrestha KK, Mostafa ME, Young MC, Karunarathne A. Optical Control of Cell-Surface and Endomembrane-Exclusive beta-Adrenergic Receptor Signaling. J Biol Chem. 2024;300:107481.
Botham RC, Roth HS, Book AP, Roady PJ, Fan TM, Hergenrother PJ. Small-Molecule Procaspase-3 Activation Sensitizes Cancer to Treatment with Diverse Chemotherapeutics. ACS Cent Sci. 2016;2:545–59.
Boudreau MW, Duraki D, Wang L, Mao CJ, Kim JE, Henn MA, et al. A small-molecule activator of the unfolded protein response eradicates human breast tumors in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabf1383.
Gianì F, Pandini G, Scalisi NM, Vigneri P, Fazzari C, Malandrino P, et al. Effect of low-dose tungsten on human thyroid stem/precursor cells and their progeny. Endocr Relat Cancer 2019;26:713–25.
Tonogai EJ, Huang S, Botham RC, Berry MR, Joslyn SK, Daniel GB, et al. Evaluation of a procaspase-3 activator with hydroxyurea or temozolomide against high-grade meningioma in cell culture and canine cancer patients. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:1723–35.
Dabiri Y, Schmid A, Theobald J, Blagojevic B, Streciwilk W, Ott I, et al. A Ruthenium(II) N-Heterocyclic Carbene (NHC) Complex with Naphthalimide Ligand Triggers Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells via Activating the ROS-p38 MAPK Pathway. IJMS. 2018;19:3964.
Gao YH, Yu S, Chen MD, Wang X, Pan L, Wei B, et al. cFLIP regulates alternative NLRP3 inflammasome activation in human monocytes. Cell Mol Immunol 2023;20:1203–15.
Peh J, Fan TM, Wycislo KL, Roth HS, Hergenrother PJ. The Combination of Vemurafenib and Procaspase-3 Activation Is Synergistic in Mutant BRAF Melanomas. Mol Cancer Therapeutics. 2016;15:1859–69.
Alippe Y, Kress D, Ricci B, Sun K, Yang T, Wang C, et al. Actions of the NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasomes overlap in bone resorption. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21837.
Miyasato S, Iwata K, Mura R, Nakamura S, Yanagida K, Shindou H, et al. Constitutively active GPR43 is crucial for proper leukocyte differentiation. FASEB J. 2023;37:e22676.
Maghe C, Trillet K, Andre-Gregoire G, Kerherve M, Merlet L, Jacobs KA, et al. The paracaspase MALT1 controls cholesterol homeostasis in glioblastoma stem-like cells through lysosome proteome shaping. Cell Rep. 2024;43:113631.
Boudreau MW, Tonogai EJ, Schane CP, Xi MX, Fischer JH, Vijayakumar J, et al. The combination of PAC-1 and entrectinib for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2023;33:514–24.
Sonoi R, Hagihara Y. Tight junction stabilization prevents HepaRG cell death in drug-induced intrahepatic cholestasis. Biol Open. 2021;10:bio058606.
Kersten R, Trampert DC, Hubers LM, Tolenaars D, Vos HR, van de Graaf SFJ, et al. Galectin-3 and prohibitin 1 are autoantigens in IgG4-related cholangitis without clear-cut protective effects against toxic bile acids. Front Immunol. 2024;14:1251134.
Ishii S, Kakizuka T, Park SJ, Tagawa A, Sanbo C, Tanabe H, et al. Genome-wide ATAC-see screening identifies TFDP1 as a modulator of global chromatin accessibility. Nat Genet. 2024;56:473–82.
Wan S, Wang X, Chen W, Wang M, Zhao J, Xu Z, et al. Exposure to high dose of polystyrene nanoplastics causes trophoblast cell apoptosis and induces miscarriage. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2024;21:13.
Trampert DC, Kersten R, Tolenaars D, Jongejan A, van de Graaf SFJ, Beuers U. Laminin 511-E8, an autoantigen in IgG4-related cholangitis, contributes to cholangiocyte protection. JHEP Rep. 2024;6:101015.
Ding Y, Chen L, Xu J, Feng Y, Liu Q. APAF1 Silencing Ameliorates Diabetic Retinopathy by Suppressing Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Caspase-3/GSDME-Dependent Pyroptosis. Diab Metab Syndr Obes. 2024;17:1635–49.
Lui KS, Ye Z, Chan HC, Tanaka Y, Cheung AKL. Anti-PD1 does not improve pyroptosis induced by gammadelta T cells but promotes tumor regression in a pleural mesothelioma mouse model. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1282710.
Zhao HK, Dai YT, Li YQ, Li JJ, Li H. TNFSF15 inhibits progression of diabetic retinopathy by blocking pyroptosis via interacting with GSDME. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15:118.
Kumar D, Gurrapu S, Wang Y, Bae SY, Pandey PR, Chen H, et al. LncRNA Malat1 suppresses pyroptosis and T cell-mediated killing of incipient metastatic cells. Nat Cancer. 2024;5:262–82.
Iessi E, Vona R, Cittadini C, Matarrese P. Targeting the Interplay between Cancer Metabolic Reprogramming and Cell Death Pathways as a Viable Therapeutic Path. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1942.
Giani F, Masto R, Trovato MA, Malandrino P, Russo M, Pellegriti G, et al. Heavy Metals in the Environment and Thyroid Cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:4052.
Cornelison RC, Wellman SM, Park JH, Porvasnik SL, Song YH, Wachs RA, et al. Development of an apoptosis-assisted decellularization method for maximal preservation of nerve tissue structure. Acta Biomater. 2018;77:116–26.
Handa K, Jindal R. Genotoxicity induced by hexavalent chromium leading to eryptosis in Ctenopharyngodon idellus. Chemosphere. 2020;247:125967.
Moffat D, Ye K, Jin S. Decellularization for the retention of tissue niches. J Tissue Eng. 2022;13:20417314221101151.
Li YX, Zou H, Zheng ZK, Liu ZH, Hu HY, Wu W, et al. Advances in the Study of Bioactive Nanoparticles for the Treatment of HCC and Its Postoperative Residual Cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:2721–35.
Hsieh MY, Hsu SK, Liu TY, Wu CY, Chiu CC. Melanoma biology and treatment: a review of novel regulated cell death-based approaches. Cancer Cell Int. 2024;24:63.
Ding CS, Yang X, Li SC, Zhang EK, Fan XD, Huang L, et al. Exploring the role of pyroptosis in shaping the tumor microenvironment of colorectal cancer by bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing. Cancer Cell Int. 2023;23:95.
Park SH, Ko W, Park SH, Lee HS, Shin I. Evaluation of the Interaction between Bax and Hsp70 in Cells by Using a FRET System Consisting of a Fluorescent Amino Acid and YFP as a FRET Pair. Chembiochem. 2020;21:59–63.
Park SH, Ko W, Lee HS, Shin I. Analysis of Protein-Protein Interaction in a Single Live Cell by Using a FRET System Based on Genetic Code Expansion Technology. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:4273–81.
Quarato G, Mari L, Barrows NJ, Yang M, Ruehl S, Chen MJ, et al. Mitophagy restricts BAX/BAK-independent, Parkin-mediated apoptosis. Sci Adv. 2023;9:eadg8156.
Vringer E, Heilig R, Riley JS, Black A, Cloix C, Skalka G, et al. Mitochondrial outer membrane integrity regulates a ubiquitin-dependent and NF-kappaB-mediated inflammatory response. EMBO J. 2024;43:904–30.
Duncan-Lewis C, Hartenian E, King V, Glaunsinger BA. Cytoplasmic mRNA decay represses RNA polymerase II transcription during early apoptosis. Elife. 2021;10:e58342.
Carter RJ, Milani M, Beckett AJ, Liu S, Prior IA, Cohen GM, et al. Novel roles of RTN4 and CLIMP-63 in regulating mitochondrial structure, bioenergetics and apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:436.
Renaud CCN, Trillet K, Jardine J, Merlet L, Renoult O, Laurent-Blond M, et al. The centrosomal protein 131 participates in the regulation of mitochondrial apoptosis. Commun Biol. 2023;6:1271.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74.
Hanahan D. Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:31–46.
Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33.
Liberti MV, Locasale JW. The Warburg Effect: How Does it Benefit Cancer Cells? Trends Biochem Sci. 2016;41:211–8.
Go S, Kramer TT, Verhoeven AJ, Oude Elferink RPJ, Chang JC. The extracellular lactate-to-pyruvate ratio modulates the sensitivity to oxidative stress-induced apoptosis via the cytosolic NADH/NAD(+) redox state. Apoptosis. 2021;26:38–51.
Kalkavan H, Chen MJ, Crawford JC, Quarato G, Fitzgerald P, Tait SWG, et al. Sublethal cytochrome c release generates drug-tolerant persister cells. Cell. 2022;185:3356–74.e22.
Louisthelmy R, Burke BM, Cornelison RC. Brain Cancer Cell-Derived Matrices and Effects on Astrocyte Migration. Cells Tissues Organs. 2023;212:21–31.
Hoijman E, Hakkinen HM, Tolosa-Ramon Q, Jimenez-Delgado S, Wyatt C, Miret-Cuesta M, et al. Cooperative epithelial phagocytosis enables error correction in the early embryo. Nature. 2021;590:618–23.
Chae HJ, Kang JS, Byun JO, Han KS, Kim DU, Oh SM, et al. Molecular mechanism of staurosporine-induced apoptosis in osteoblasts. Pharm Res. 2000;42:373–81.
Pommier Y, Leo E, Zhang H, Marchand C. DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs. Chem Biol. 2010;17:421–33.
Hande KR. Etoposide: four decades of development of a topoisomerase II inhibitor. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1514–21.
Thorn CF, Oshiro C, Marsh S, Hernandez-Boussard T, McLeod H, Klein TE, et al. Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2011;21:440–6.
Tchounwou PB, Dasari S, Noubissi FK, Ray P, Kumar S. Advances in Our Understanding of the Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Cisplatin in Cancer Therapy. J Exp Pharm. 2021;13:303–28.
Matt S, Hofmann TG. The DNA damage-induced cell death response: a roadmap to kill cancer cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:2829–50.
Townsend PA, Kozhevnikova MV, Cexus ONF, Zamyatnin AA Jr, Soond SM. BH3-mimetics: recent developments in cancer therapy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:355.
Danciu OC, Holdhoff M, Peterson RA, Fischer JH, Liu LC, Wang H, et al. Phase I study of procaspase-activating compound-1 (PAC-1) in the treatment of advanced malignancies. Brit J Cancer. 2023;128:783–92.
Holdhoff M, Nicholas M, Peterson R, Danciu O, Maraka S, Hergenrother P, et al. Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Procaspase Activating Compound-1 (Pac-1) in Combination with Temozolomide in Patients with Recurrent Anaplastic Astrocytoma or Glioblastoma. Neurooncology. 2019;21:28.
Lucas PW, Schmit JM, Peterson QP, West DC, Hsu DC, Novotny CJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics and derivation of an anticancer dosing regimen for PAC-1, a preferential small molecule activator of procaspase-3, in healthy dogs. Invest N Drugs. 2011;29:901–11.
Peterson QP, Hsu DC, Goode DR, Novotny CJ, Totten RK, Hergenrother PJ. Procaspase-3 Activation as an Anti-Cancer Strategy: Structure-Activity Relationship of Procaspase-Activating Compound 1 (PAC-1) and Its Cellular Co-Localization with Caspase-3. J Med Chem. 2009;52:5721–31.
Peterson QP, Goode DR, West DC, Ramsey KN, Lee JJY, Hergenrother PJ. PAC-1 Activates Procaspase-3 in Vitro through Relief of Zinc-Mediated Inhibition. J Mol Biol. 2009;388:144–58.
Schlein LJ, Fadl-Alla B, Pondenis HC, Lezmi S, Eberhart CG, LeBlanc AK, et al. Immunohistochemical Characterization of Procaspase-3 Overexpression as a Druggable Target With PAC-1, a Procaspase-3 Activator, in Canine and Human Brain Cancers. Front Oncol. 2019;9:96.
Hsu DC, Roth HS, West DC, Botham RC, Novotny CJ, Schmid SC, et al. Parallel Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 837 Analogues of Procaspase-Activating Compound 1 (PAC-1). Acs Comb Sci. 2012;14:44–50.
Roth HS, Botham RC, Schmid SC, Fan TM, Dirikolu L, Hergenrother PJ. Removal of Metabolic Liabilities Enables Development of Derivatives of Procaspase-Activating Compound 1 (PAC-1) with Improved Pharmacokinetics. J Med Chem. 2015;58:4046–65.
Park SH, Baek KH, Shin I, Shin I. Subcellular Hsp70 Inhibitors Promote Cancer Cell Death via Different Mechanisms. Cell Chem Biol. 2018;25:1242-+.
Schneider KS, Gross CJ, Dreier RF, Saller BS, Mishra R, Gorka O, et al. The Inflammasome Drives GSDMD-Independent Secondary Pyroptosis and IL-1 Release in the Absence of Caspase-1 Protease Activity. Cell Rep. 2017;21:3846–59.
Park WY, Gray JM, Holewinski RJ, Andresson T, So JY, Carmona-Rivera C, et al. Apoptosis-induced nuclear expulsion in tumor cells drives S100a4-mediated metastatic outgrowth through the RAGE pathway. Nat Cancer. 2023;4:419–35.
St Louis BM, Quagliato SM, Su YT, Dyson G, Lee PC. The Hippo kinases control inflammatory Hippo signaling and restrict bacterial infection in phagocytes. mBio. 2024;15:e0342923.
Haffez H, Taha H, Farrag NS, Amin AM, Hassan ZA. Biological Screening and Radiolabeling of Raptinal as a Potential Anticancer Novel Drug in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Model. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021;158:105653.
Nurcahyanti AD, Wink M. L-Canavanine potentiates the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin and cisplatin in arginine deprived human cancer cells. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1542.
Kullenberg F, Degerstedt O, Calitz C, Pavlovic N, Balgoma D, Grasjo J, et al. In Vitro Cell Toxicity and Intracellular Uptake of Doxorubicin Exposed as a Solution or Liposomes: Implications for Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cells. 2021;10:1717.
Tan Y, Chen Q, Li X, Zeng Z, Xiong W, Li G, et al. Pyroptosis: a new paradigm of cell death for fighting against cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40:153.
Ren Y, Feng M, Hao X, Liu X, Li J, Li P, et al. USP48 Stabilizes Gasdermin E to Promote Pyroptosis in Cancer. Cancer Res. 2023;83:1074–93.
Ai YL, Wang WJ, Liu FJ, Fang W, Chen HZ, Wu LZ, et al. Mannose antagonizes GSDME-mediated pyroptosis through AMPK activated by metabolite GlcNAc-6P. Cell Res. 2023;33:904–22.
Wang C, Yang T, Xiao J, Xu C, Alippe Y, Sun K, et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation triggers gasdermin D-independent inflammation. Sci Immunol. 2021;6:eabj3859.
Neuwirt E, Magnani G, Cikovic T, Wohrle S, Fischer L, Kostina A, et al. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors can activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in myeloid cells through lysosomal damage and cell lysis. Sci Signal. 2023;16:eabh1083.
Taha H, Elfar N, Haffez H, Hassan ZA. Raptinal silver nanoparticles: new therapeutic advances in hepatocellular carcinoma mouse model. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharm. 2021;394:279–89.
Thompson CB. Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science. 1995;267:1456–62.
Favaloro B, Allocati N, Graziano V, Di Ilio C, De Laurenzi V. Role of apoptosis in disease. Aging. 2012;4:330–49.
Zack E. Chemotherapy and biotherapeutic agents for autoimmune diseases. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16:E125–32.
Han J, Sabbatini P, Perez D, Rao L, Modha D, White E. The E1B 19K protein blocks apoptosis by interacting with and inhibiting the p53-inducible and death-promoting Bax protein. Genes Dev. 1996;10:461–77.
Bu X, Gong P, Zhang L, Song W, Hou J, Li Q, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of cGAS ameliorates postoperative cognitive dysfunction by suppressing caspase-3/GSDME-dependent pyroptosis. Neurochem Int. 2024;178:105788.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the NIH (R35CA283859) for support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AJS and PJH conceived the manuscript, it was written by AJS with assistance of PJH.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The University of Illinois has a patent on Raptinal on which PJH is an inventor.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, A.J., Hergenrother, P.J. Raptinal: a powerful tool for rapid induction of apoptotic cell death. Cell Death Discov. 10, 371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-02120-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-024-02120-1