[go: up one dir, main page]

 
 

Topic Editors

Colleague of Mathematics and Systems Science, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations

Abstract submission deadline
30 April 2025
Manuscript submission deadline
30 June 2025
Viewed by
28369

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Partial differential equations (PDE) are important mathematical models whose solutions are always hard to obtain. Therefore, solving partial differential equations numerically is of great significance and has application value in the field of scientific research and engineering applications. Many studies have been devoted to this problem, and the finite element methods, finite volume methods, and finite difference methods have been the most successful. However, the development of novel and efficient numerical method meets many challenges. Toward this end, our Topic seeks to contribute to the numerical approximation of PDEs in various science and engineering fields that focus on theoretical results describing robustness, stability, and convergence of the new methods. The Topic seeks to be interdisciplinary while emphasizing numerical analysis and approximation theory in the following areas of research:

  • Discretization schemes for linear and nonlinear PDEs;
  • Techniques for high-dimensional spatial PDEs;
  • Learning algorithms for data-driven solutions to PDEs;
  • New approaches for modeling complex phenomena with PDEs.

Prof. Dr. Pengzhan Huang
Prof. Dr. Yinnian He
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • numerical analysis
  • numerical method
  • finite-difference
  • finite-element
  • computation
  • partial-differential equations

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Axioms
axioms
1.9 - 2012 21 Days CHF 2400 Submit
Computation
computation
1.9 3.5 2013 19.7 Days CHF 1800 Submit
Entropy
entropy
2.1 4.9 1999 22.4 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Mathematical and Computational Applications
mca
1.9 - 1996 28.8 Days CHF 1400 Submit
Mathematics
mathematics
2.3 4.0 2013 17.1 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Symmetry
symmetry
2.2 5.4 2009 16.8 Days CHF 2400 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidiscipline platform providing preprint service that is dedicated to sharing your research from the start and empowering your research journey.

MDPI Topics is cooperating with Preprints.org and has built a direct connection between MDPI journals and Preprints.org. Authors are encouraged to enjoy the benefits by posting a preprint at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Immediately share your ideas ahead of publication and establish your research priority;
  2. Protect your idea from being stolen with this time-stamped preprint article;
  3. Enhance the exposure and impact of your research;
  4. Receive feedback from your peers in advance;
  5. Have it indexed in Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (21 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 384 KiB  
Article
Exponential Convergence and Computational Efficiency of BURA-SD Method for Fractional Diffusion Equations in Polygons
by Svetozar Margenov
Mathematics 2024, 12(14), 2266; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12142266 - 19 Jul 2024
Viewed by 418
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a new Best Uniform Rational Approximation-Semi-Discrete (BURA-SD) method taking into account the singularities of the solution of fractional diffusion problems in polygonal domains. The complementary capabilities of the exponential convergence rate of BURA-SD and the hp FEM [...] Read more.
In this paper, we develop a new Best Uniform Rational Approximation-Semi-Discrete (BURA-SD) method taking into account the singularities of the solution of fractional diffusion problems in polygonal domains. The complementary capabilities of the exponential convergence rate of BURA-SD and the hp FEM are explored with the aim of maximizing the overall performance. A challenge here is the emerging singularly perturbed diffusion–reaction equations. The main contributions of this paper include asymptotically accurate error estimates, ending with sufficient conditions to balance errors of different origins, thereby guaranteeing the high computational efficiency of the method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Patches with: (<b>left</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> layers of geometric refinement towards an edge (A2); (<b>centre</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> layers of geometric refinement towards a corner (A3); (<b>right</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>L</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> layers of geometric refinement towards an edge and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> layers of geometric refinement towards a corner that is vertex of the same edge (A4).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Behavior of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo form="prefix">ln</mo> <msqrt> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mstyle scriptlevel="0" displaystyle="true"> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>d</mi> <mo stretchy="false">˜</mo> </mover> <mi>i</mi> </msub> </mfrac> </mstyle> </mrow> </msqrt> </mrow> </semantics></math> for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mi>i</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>{</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mo>…</mo> <mo>,</mo> <mn>30</mn> <mo>}</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <mo>{</mo> <mn>0.25</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.50</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mn>0.75</mn> <mo>}</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
23 pages, 7396 KiB  
Article
A Hybrid Method for Solving the One-Dimensional Wave Equation of Tapered Sucker-Rod Strings
by Jiaojian Yin and Hongzhang Ma
Axioms 2024, 13(6), 414; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13060414 - 20 Jun 2024
Viewed by 344
Abstract
Simulating surface conditions by solving the wave equation of a sucker-rod string is the theoretical basis of a sucker-rod pumping system. To overcome the shortcomings of the conventional finite difference method and analytical solution, this work describes a novel hybrid method that combines [...] Read more.
Simulating surface conditions by solving the wave equation of a sucker-rod string is the theoretical basis of a sucker-rod pumping system. To overcome the shortcomings of the conventional finite difference method and analytical solution, this work describes a novel hybrid method that combines the analytical solution with the finite difference method. In this method, an analytical solution of the tapered rod wave equation with a recursive matrix form based on the Fourier series is proposed, a unified pumping condition model is established, a modified finite difference method is given, a hybrid strategy is established, and a convergence calculation method is proposed. Based on two different types of oil wells, the analytical solutions are verified by comparing different methods. The hybrid method is verified by using the finite difference method simulated data and measured oil data. The pumping speed sensitivity and convergence of the hybrid method are studied. The results show that the proposed analytical solution has high accuracy, with a maximum relative error relative to that of the classical finite difference method of 0.062%. The proposed hybrid method has a high simulation accuracy, with a maximum relative area error relative to that of the finite difference method of 0.09% and a maximum relative area error relative to measured data of 1.89%. Even at higher pumping speeds, the hybrid method still has accuracy. The hybrid method in this paper is convergent. The introduction of the finite difference method allows the hybrid method to more easily converge. The novelty of this work is that it combines the advantages of the finite difference method and the analytical solution, and it provides a convergence calculation method to provide guidance for its application. The hybrid method presented in this paper provides an alternative scheme for predicting the behavior of sucker-rod pumping systems and a new approach for solving wave equations with complex boundary conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Flowchart of the solving procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Schematic of the calculation domain in the hybrid method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Flowchart of the hybrid method procedure.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Calculated results of the analytical solution, the finite difference method, and the SMD method for well 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Calculated results of the analytical solution, the finite difference method, and the SMD method for well 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulation cards of the hybrid method and the finite difference method for well 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulation cards of the hybrid method and the finite difference method for well 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Measured surface dynamometer card and simulated card by the hybrid method for well 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Measured surface dynamometer card and simulated cards by the hybrid method and the old method for well 2.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Cards simulated by the hybrid method and the finite difference method with different pump speeds for well 1. (<b>a</b>) First loop at a speed of n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>b</b>) First loop at a speed of 2 n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>c</b>) First loop at a speed of 3 n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>d</b>) Finished loop at a speed of n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>e</b>) Finished loop at a speed of 2 n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>f</b>) Finished loop at a speed of 3 n<sub>p</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Cards simulated by the hybrid method and the finite difference method with different pump speeds for well 2. (<b>a</b>) First loop at a speed of n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>b</b>) First loop at a speed of 2 n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>c</b>) First loop at a speed of 3 n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>d</b>) Finished loop at a speed of n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>e</b>) Finished loop at a speed of 2 n<sub>p</sub>. (<b>f</b>) Finished loop at a speed of 3 n<sub>p</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Convergence curve of well 1 at a pump speed of 1 n<sub>p</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Convergence curve of well 1 at a pump speed of 3 n<sub>p</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Convergence curve of well 2 at a pump speed of 1 n<sub>p</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Convergence curve of well 2 at a pump speed of 3 n<sub>p</sub>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Load curves and its frequency spectrums of well 1.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Load curves and its frequency spectrums of well 2.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 3882 KiB  
Article
Numerical Solutions of Second-Order Elliptic Equations with C-Bézier Basis
by Lanyin Sun, Fangming Su and Kunkun Pang
Axioms 2024, 13(2), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13020084 - 27 Jan 2024
Viewed by 876
Abstract
This article introduces a finite element method based on the C-Bézier basis function for second-order elliptic equations. The trial function of the finite element method is set up using a combination of C-Bézier tensor product bases. One advantage of the C-Bézier basis is [...] Read more.
This article introduces a finite element method based on the C-Bézier basis function for second-order elliptic equations. The trial function of the finite element method is set up using a combination of C-Bézier tensor product bases. One advantage of the C-Bézier basis is that it has a free shape parameter, which makes geometric modeling more convenience and flexible. The performance of the C-Bézier basis is searched for by studying three test examples. The numerical results demonstrate that this method is able to provide more accurate numerical approximations than the classical Lagrange basis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>C-Bézier basis functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>C-Bézier curves with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>α</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mfrac> <mi>π</mi> <mn>4</mn> </mfrac> <mo>,</mo> <mfrac> <mi>π</mi> <mn>3</mn> </mfrac> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mfrac> <mi>π</mi> <mn>6</mn> </mfrac> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Tensor-product C-Bézier surfaces and their control grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Reference biquadratic C-Bézier basis.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Error graphs (generated from Example 1).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Error graphs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Error graphs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Error graphs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Error graphs (generated from Example 3).</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Error graphs.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 561 KiB  
Article
A Steady-State-Preserving Numerical Scheme for One-Dimensional Blood Flow Model
by Carlos A. Vega, Sonia Valbuena and Jesús Blanco Bojato
Mathematics 2024, 12(3), 407; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12030407 - 26 Jan 2024
Viewed by 748
Abstract
In this work, an entropy-stable and well-balanced numerical scheme for a one-dimensional blood flow model is presented. Such a scheme was obtained from an explicit entropy-conservative flux along with a second-order discretisation of the source term by using centred finite differences. We prove [...] Read more.
In this work, an entropy-stable and well-balanced numerical scheme for a one-dimensional blood flow model is presented. Such a scheme was obtained from an explicit entropy-conservative flux along with a second-order discretisation of the source term by using centred finite differences. We prove that the scheme is entropy-stable and preserves steady-state solutions. In addition, some numerical examples are included to test the performance of the proposed scheme. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Rarefaction waves: area and velocity at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.009</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the reference and approximate solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Shock waves: area and velocity at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.012</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the references and approximate solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Shock and rarefaction waves: area and velocity at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.012</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> for the references and approximate solutions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Entropy vs. time on a mesh with 200 uniform cells.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Numerical solutions of the zero-pressure man-at-eternal-rest problem on a mesh with 200 cells at time <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. Area and area at rest (<b>left</b>) and comparison between solutions obtained with WB-ES and Lax–Friedrichs schemes (<b>right</b>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Area minus area at rest (left) and velocity (right) for the non-zero-pressure man-at-eternal-rest problem at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mi mathvariant="normal">s</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on three different meshes: <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>100</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>200</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>M</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>400</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
20 pages, 1458 KiB  
Article
Modified Characteristic Finite Element Method with Second-Order Spatial Accuracy for Solving Convection-Dominated Problem on Surfaces
by Longyuan Wu, Xinlong Feng and Yinnian He
Entropy 2023, 25(12), 1631; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25121631 - 7 Dec 2023
Viewed by 881
Abstract
We present a modified characteristic finite element method that exhibits second-order spatial accuracy for solving convection–reaction–diffusion equations on surfaces. The temporal direction adopted the backward-Euler method, while the spatial direction employed the surface finite element method. In contrast to regular domains, it is [...] Read more.
We present a modified characteristic finite element method that exhibits second-order spatial accuracy for solving convection–reaction–diffusion equations on surfaces. The temporal direction adopted the backward-Euler method, while the spatial direction employed the surface finite element method. In contrast to regular domains, it is observed that the point in the characteristic direction traverses the surface only once within a brief time. Thus, good approximation of the solution in the characteristic direction holds significant importance for the numerical scheme. In this regard, Taylor expansion is employed to reconstruct the solution beyond the surface in the characteristic direction. The stability of our scheme is then proved. A comparison is carried out with an existing characteristic finite element method based on face mesh. Numerical examples are provided to validate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>The schematic diagram of the CFEM in [<a href="#B29-entropy-25-01631" class="html-bibr">29</a>] for approximate <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="bold">x</mi> <mo>ˇ</mo> </mover> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The schematic diagram of our MCFEM for approximate <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>(</mo> <mover accent="true"> <mi mathvariant="bold">x</mi> <mo>ˇ</mo> </mover> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> errors of various methods with time at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>The simulations and corresponding errors of various methods with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The simulations and corresponding errors of various methods with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> on a tooth.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The simulations and corresponding errors of various methods with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϵ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>h</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> on a torus.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>The simulations of discontinuous source term problem at various time in Example <a href="#sec4dot2-entropy-25-01631" class="html-sec">Section 4.2</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The MCFEM for simulating Burgers problem in <a href="#sec4dot3-entropy-25-01631" class="html-sec">Section 4.3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>The X-axis projection of the numerical solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>u</mi> <mi>h</mi> <mi>n</mi> </msubsup> </semantics></math> is restricted to <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>|</mo> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mn>4</mn> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> </mrow> <mo>×</mo> <mspace width="3.33333pt"/> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mrow> <mo>−</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math> in <a href="#sec4dot3-entropy-25-01631" class="html-sec">Section 4.3</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>The initial condition of convection Allen–Cahn equation in <a href="#sec4dot4-entropy-25-01631" class="html-sec">Section 4.4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>The evolution of energy of convection Allen–Cahn equation with time in <a href="#sec4dot4-entropy-25-01631" class="html-sec">Section 4.4</a>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Time snapshot of the numerical solution for convection Allen–Cahn equation in <a href="#sec4dot4-entropy-25-01631" class="html-sec">Section 4.4</a>.</p>
Full article ">
21 pages, 2571 KiB  
Article
An Efficient Method for Solving Two-Dimensional Partial Differential Equations with the Deep Operator Network
by Xiaoyu Zhang, Yichao Wang, Xiting Peng and Chaofeng Zhang
Axioms 2023, 12(12), 1095; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12121095 - 29 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1617
Abstract
Partial differential equations (PDEs) usually apply for modeling complex physical phenomena in the real world, and the corresponding solution is the key to interpreting these problems. Generally, traditional solving methods suffer from inefficiency and time consumption. At the same time, the current rise [...] Read more.
Partial differential equations (PDEs) usually apply for modeling complex physical phenomena in the real world, and the corresponding solution is the key to interpreting these problems. Generally, traditional solving methods suffer from inefficiency and time consumption. At the same time, the current rise in machine learning algorithms, represented by the Deep Operator Network (DeepONet), could compensate for these shortcomings and effectively predict the solutions of PDEs by learning the operators from the data. The current deep learning-based methods focus on solving one-dimensional PDEs, but the research on higher-dimensional problems is still in development. Therefore, this paper proposes an efficient scheme to predict the solution of two-dimensional PDEs with improved DeepONet. In order to construct the data needed for training, the functions are sampled from a classical function space and produce the corresponding two-dimensional data. The difference method is used to obtain the numerical solutions of the PDEs and form a point-value data set. For training the network, the matrix representing two-dimensional functions is processed to form vectors and adapt the DeepONet model perfectly. In addition, we theoretically prove that the discrete point division of the data ensures that the model loss is guaranteed to be in a small range. This method is verified for predicting the two-dimensional Poisson equation and heat conduction equation solutions through experiments. Compared with other methods, the proposed scheme is simple and effective. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>DeepONet architecture.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The proposed method.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Training points in Poisson equation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Training and test losses.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Prediction result.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The predictions and numerical solutions. (<b>a</b>,<b>b</b>) represent the DeepONet prediction of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, and (<b>c</b>,<b>d</b>) represent the true value of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>s</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Training points in heat conduction equation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Model training and test losses in different input functions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Prediction results for six time periods. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the prediction results from <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>6</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> time periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Numerical results for six time periods. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the numerical results from <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>6</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> time periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10 Cont.
<p>Numerical results for six time periods. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the numerical results from <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>6</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> time periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Model training and test losses in different training data points.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Model training and test losses in different function spaces.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Prediction results when function space is Chebyshev polynomials. (<b>a</b>–<b>f</b>) represent the prediction results from <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> to <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>t</mi> <mn>6</mn> </msub> </semantics></math> time periods, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Model training and test losses. The loss will be reduced if the input functions and training points are increased.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Model training and test losses after enlarging data set.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Model training and test losses in different periods.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>Compared with FNN and ResNet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>Compared with CNN.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 6415 KiB  
Article
High-Performance Computational Method for an Extended Three-Coupled Korteweg–de Vries System
by Panpan Wang and Xiufang Feng
Axioms 2023, 12(10), 990; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12100990 - 19 Oct 2023
Viewed by 927
Abstract
This paper calculates numerical solutions of an extended three-coupled Korteweg–de Vries system by the q-homotopy analysis transformation method (q-HATM), which is a hybrid of the Laplace transform and the q-homotopy analysis method. Multiple investigations inspecting planetary oceans, optical cables, and cosmic plasma have [...] Read more.
This paper calculates numerical solutions of an extended three-coupled Korteweg–de Vries system by the q-homotopy analysis transformation method (q-HATM), which is a hybrid of the Laplace transform and the q-homotopy analysis method. Multiple investigations inspecting planetary oceans, optical cables, and cosmic plasma have employed the KdV model, significantly contributing to its development. The uniqueness, convergence, and maximum absolute truncation error of this algorithm are demonstrated. A numerical simulation has been performed to validate the accuracy and validity of the proposed approach. With high accuracy and few algorithmic processes, this algorithm supplies a series solution in the form of a recursive relation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) Numerical solutions. (<b>b</b>) Analytical solutions. (<b>c</b>) Comparison of numerical solutions and analytical solutions at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>ℏ</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> for Equation (<a href="#FD1-axioms-12-00990" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) Numerical solutions. (<b>b</b>) Analytical solutions. (<b>c</b>) Comparison of numerical solutions and analytical solutions at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>ℏ</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> for Equation (<a href="#FD1-axioms-12-00990" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Numerical solutions. (<b>b</b>) Analytical solutions. (<b>c</b>) Comparison of numerical solutions and analytical solutions at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>ℏ</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> for Equation (<a href="#FD1-axioms-12-00990" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Surface of (<b>a</b>) absolute error = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) Absolute error = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) Absolute error = <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi>e</mi> <mi>x</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <msub> <mi>w</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>m</mi> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mrow> <mo>|</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>ℏ</mo> <mo>=</mo> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> of Equation (<a href="#FD1-axioms-12-00990" class="html-disp-formula">1</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>When <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, the outline of (<b>a</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">u</span>, (<b>b</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">v</span>, and (<b>c</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">w</span> with different <span class="html-italic">x</span> values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>When <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, the outline of (<b>a</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">u</span>, (<b>b</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">v</span>, and (<b>c</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">w</span> with different <span class="html-italic">x</span> values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>When <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.01</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, the outline of (<b>a</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">u</span>, (<b>b</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">v</span>, and (<b>c</b>) numerical solutions <span class="html-italic">w</span> with different <span class="html-italic">x</span> values.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 5254 KiB  
Article
Applying Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Solve Navier–Stokes Equations for Laminar Flow around a Particle
by Beichao Hu and Dwayne McDaniel
Math. Comput. Appl. 2023, 28(5), 102; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28050102 - 13 Oct 2023
Viewed by 3015
Abstract
In recent years, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have drawn great interest among researchers as a tool to solve computational physics problems. Unlike conventional neural networks, which are black-box models that “blindly” establish a correlation between input and output variables using a large quantity [...] Read more.
In recent years, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have drawn great interest among researchers as a tool to solve computational physics problems. Unlike conventional neural networks, which are black-box models that “blindly” establish a correlation between input and output variables using a large quantity of labeled data, PINNs directly embed physical laws (primarily partial differential equations) within the loss function of neural networks. By minimizing the loss function, this approach allows the output variables to automatically satisfy physical equations without the need for labeled data. The Navier–Stokes equation is one of the most classic governing equations in thermal fluid engineering. This study constructs a PINN to solve the Navier–Stokes equations for a 2D incompressible laminar flow problem. Flows passing around a 2D circular particle are chosen as the benchmark case, and an elliptical particle is also examined to enrich the research. The velocity and pressure fields are predicted by the PINNs, and the results are compared with those derived from Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Additionally, the particle drag force coefficient is calculated to quantify the discrepancy in the results of the PINNs as compared to CFD outcomes. The drag coefficient maintained an error within 10% across all test scenarios. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>PINNs framework proposed in this work.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Computational domain of the benchmark case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Sample points in the domain. Red points are the inlet, green points are the wall, blue points are the interior points, and yellow points are the outlet.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Illustration of the drag force calculation.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Computational grid of the benchmark case in CFD.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Result comparisons of CFD and PINNs of flow passing around a 2D circular particle at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5. (<b>a1</b>) Velocity contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>a2</b>) velocity contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>b1</b>) pressure contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>b2</b>) pressure contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>c1</b>) velocity vectors of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>c2</b>) velocity vectors of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Result comparisons of CFD and PINNs of flow passing around a 2D circular particle at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5. (<b>a1</b>) Velocity contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>a2</b>) velocity contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>b1</b>) pressure contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>b2</b>) pressure contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>c1</b>) velocity vectors of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5; (<b>c2</b>) velocity vectors of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Result comparisons of CFD and PINNs of flow passing around a 2D circular particle at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20. (<b>a1</b>) Velocity contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20; (<b>a2</b>) velocity contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20; (<b>b1</b>) pressure contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20; (<b>b2</b>) pressure contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20; (<b>c1</b>) velocity vectors of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20; (<b>c2</b>) velocity vectors of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Result comparisons of CFD and PINNs of flow passing around a 2D circular particle at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50. (<b>a1</b>) Velocity contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50; (<b>a2</b>) velocity contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50; (<b>b1</b>) pressure contour of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50; (<b>b2</b>) pressure contour of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50; (<b>c1</b>) velocity vectors of CFD at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50; (<b>c2</b>) velocity vectors of PINNs at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 50.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Result comparisons of CFD and PINNs of flow passing around a 2D elliptical particle at <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 20. (<b>a1</b>) Velocity contour of CFD; (<b>a2</b>) velocity contour of PINNs; (<b>b1</b>) pressure contour of CFD; (<b>b2</b>) pressure contour of PINNs; (<b>c1</b>) velocity vectors of CFD; (<b>c2</b>) velocity vectors of PINNs.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Training history of the case <span class="html-italic">Re</span> = 5. Residual vs. iterations.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 299 KiB  
Article
Convergence Analysis of the Strang Splitting Method for the Degasperis-Procesi Equation
by Runjie Zhang and Jinwei Fang
Axioms 2023, 12(10), 946; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12100946 - 4 Oct 2023
Viewed by 825
Abstract
This article is concerned with the convergence properties of the Strang splitting method for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, which models shallow water dynamics. The challenges of analyzing splitting methods for this equation lie in the fact that the involved suboperators are both nonlinear. In [...] Read more.
This article is concerned with the convergence properties of the Strang splitting method for the Degasperis-Procesi equation, which models shallow water dynamics. The challenges of analyzing splitting methods for this equation lie in the fact that the involved suboperators are both nonlinear. In this paper, instead of building the second order convergence in L2 for the proposed method directly, we first show that the Strang splitting method has first order convergence in H2. In the analysis, the Lie derivative bounds for the local errors are crucial. The obtained first order convergence result provides the H2 boundedness of the approximate solutions, thereby enabling us to subsequently establish the second order convergence in L2 for the Strang splitting method. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
17 pages, 14521 KiB  
Article
A Boundary-Type Numerical Procedure to Solve Nonlinear Nonhomogeneous Backward-in-Time Heat Conduction Equations
by Yung-Wei Chen, Jian-Hung Shen, Yen-Shen Chang and Chun-Ming Chang
Mathematics 2023, 11(19), 4052; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11194052 - 24 Sep 2023
Viewed by 862
Abstract
In this paper, an explicit boundary-type numerical procedure, including a constraint-type fictitious time integration method (FTIM) and a two-point boundary solution of the Lie-group shooting method (LGSM), is constructed to tackle nonlinear nonhomogeneous backward heat conduction problems (BHCPs). Conventional methods cannot effectively overcome [...] Read more.
In this paper, an explicit boundary-type numerical procedure, including a constraint-type fictitious time integration method (FTIM) and a two-point boundary solution of the Lie-group shooting method (LGSM), is constructed to tackle nonlinear nonhomogeneous backward heat conduction problems (BHCPs). Conventional methods cannot effectively overcome numerical instability to solve inverse problems that lack initial conditions and take a long time to calculate, even using different variable transformations and regularization techniques. Therefore, an explicit-type numerical procedure is developed from the FTIM and the LGSM to avoid numerical instability and numerical iterations. First, a two-point boundary solution of the LGSM is introduced into the numerical algorithm. Then, the maximum and minimum values of the initial guess value can be determined linearly from the boundary conditions at the initial and final times. Finally, an explicit-type boundary-type numerical procedure, including a boundary value solution and constraint-type FTIM, can directly avoid the numerical iterative problems of BHCPs. Several nonlinear examples are tested. Based on the numerical results shown, this boundary-type numerical procedure using a two-point solution can directly obtain an approximated solution and can achieve stable convergence to boundary conditions, even if numerical iterations occur. Furthermore, the numerical efficiency and accuracy are better than in the previous literature, even with an increased computational time span without the regularization technique. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Schematic diagram of the FTIM in fictitious, space, and time directions.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Ratios of the BCs at boundaries <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Γ</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>j</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> and interior <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> <mfenced separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>j</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>, respectively.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exact solution of the BHCP and (<b>b</b>) the numerical absolute errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Example 1: (<b>a</b>) Convergence behavior and (<b>b</b>) numerical absolute errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>(<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) numerical errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Example 2: (<b>a</b>) Convergence behavior and (<b>b</b>) numerical absolute errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) interior solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Contour of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> from Equation (28).</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exact solution of ICs and (<b>b</b>) the numerical absolute errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Example 3: Comparing the ratios of the two-point boundary solution at the final and initial time: (<b>a</b>) exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exact solution of ICs and (<b>b</b>) numerical absolute errors when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Comparing the ratios of the two-point boundary solution at the final and initial time: (<b>a</b>) exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>δ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>%</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p><math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> segmentation diagram.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Initial guess value in <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 15
<p>Example 4: (<b>a</b>) Exact solution of ICs and (<b>b</b>) numerical absolute errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 16
<p>Example 4: Comparing the ratios of the two-point boundary solution at the final and initial time: (<b>a</b>) exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>, (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 17
<p>(<b>a</b>) Numerical solution of ICs and (<b>b</b>) numerical absolute errors.</p>
Full article ">Figure 18
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exact solution of ICs at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) absolute errors of ICs at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 19
<p>(<b>a</b>) Exact <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> and (<b>b</b>) absolute errors of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 20
<p>(<b>a</b>) Numerical absolute errors and (<b>b</b>) absolute errors of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 21
<p>(<b>a</b>) Numerical absolute errors and (<b>b</b>) absolute errors of <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mfenced open="|" close="|" separators="|"> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>−</mo> <mi>Z</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mo>Ω</mo> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </mfenced> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>x</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>y</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mo> </mo> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>z</mi> </mrow> </msub> <mo>=</mo> <mn>21</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
16 pages, 6724 KiB  
Article
Efficient Numerical Simulation of Biochemotaxis Phenomena in Fluid Environments
by Xingying Zhou, Guoqing Bian, Yan Wang and Xufeng Xiao
Entropy 2023, 25(8), 1224; https://doi.org/10.3390/e25081224 - 17 Aug 2023
Viewed by 1017
Abstract
A novel dimension splitting method is proposed for the efficient numerical simulation of a biochemotaxis model, which is a coupled system of chemotaxis–fluid equations and incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. A second-order pressure correction method is employed to decouple the velocity and pressure for the [...] Read more.
A novel dimension splitting method is proposed for the efficient numerical simulation of a biochemotaxis model, which is a coupled system of chemotaxis–fluid equations and incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. A second-order pressure correction method is employed to decouple the velocity and pressure for the Navier–Stokes equations. Then, the alternating direction implicit scheme is used to solve the velocity equation, and the operator with dimension splitting effect is used instead of the traditional elliptic operator to solve the pressure equation. For the chemotactic equation, the operator splitting method and extrapolation technique are used to solve oxygen and cell density to achieve second-order time accuracy. The proposed dimension splitting method splits the two-dimensional problem into a one-dimensional problem by splitting the spatial derivative, which reduces the computation and storage costs. Finally, through interesting experiments, we show the evolution of the cell plume shape during the descent process. The effect of changing specific parameters on the velocity and plume shape during the descent process is also studied. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>A diagram of the location of variables (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mn>1</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mi>v</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>q</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>The convergence and accuracy comparison results of the proposed method. (<b>a</b>) The proposed dimension splitting method. (<b>b</b>) Standard FD discretization without dimension splitting.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Simulation results of a biochemotaxis phenomenon with <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5000</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.092</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.092</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.092</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>i</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.113</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>k</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.113</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>l</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.113</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Simulation results of a biochemotaxis phenomenon <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5000</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.035</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.035</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.035</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.052</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.052</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.052</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.06</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.06</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>i</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.06</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>k</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>l</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.07</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Simulation results of a biochemotaxis phenomenon <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>50</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5000</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.03</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.03</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.03</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>)<span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.05</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.058</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.058</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>i</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.058</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.067</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>k</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.067</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>l</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.067</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Simulation results of a biochemotaxis phenomenon <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1000</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.35</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.35</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.35</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>i</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>k</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>l</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Simulation results of a biochemotaxis phenomenon <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>β</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>30</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3000</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.09</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.09</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.09</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.12</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>i</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>k</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>l</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.15</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Simulation results of a biochemotaxis phenomenon with initial value <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msup> <mi>q</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msup> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>x</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.8</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mn>0.2</mn> <mo>·</mo> <mi>r</mi> <mi>a</mi> <mi>n</mi> <mi>d</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>a</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.095</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.095</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.095</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>e</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.13</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>g</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.141</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>h</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.141</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>i</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.141</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>j</b>) <span class="html-italic">q</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.144</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>k</b>) <span class="html-italic">c</span> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.144</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>l</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> </semantics></math> at <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.144</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
11 pages, 3951 KiB  
Article
M-WDRNNs: Mixed-Weighted Deep Residual Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems
by Jiachun Zheng and Yunlei Yang
Axioms 2023, 12(8), 750; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12080750 - 30 Jul 2023
Viewed by 1215
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used to solve partial differential equations in recent years. But studies have shown that there is a gradient pathology in PINNs. That is, there is an imbalance gradient problem in each regularization term during back-propagation, which [...] Read more.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used to solve partial differential equations in recent years. But studies have shown that there is a gradient pathology in PINNs. That is, there is an imbalance gradient problem in each regularization term during back-propagation, which makes it difficult for neural network models to accurately approximate partial differential equations. Based on the depth-weighted residual neural network and neural attention mechanism, we propose a new mixed-weighted residual block in which the weighted coefficients are chosen autonomously by the optimization algorithm, and one of the transformer networks is replaced by a skip connection. Finally, we test our algorithms with some partial differential equations, such as the non-homogeneous Klein–Gordon equation, the (1+1) advection–diffusion equation, and the Helmholtz equation. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm significantly improves the numerical accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>A</b>) Weighted residual block, where <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>Y</mi> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> represents the output of the hidden layer. (<b>B</b>) Residual block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Mixed-weighted residual block.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Top panel: (<b>A</b>) PINN prediction. (<b>B</b>) PINN point-wise error. Bottom panel: (<b>C</b>) M-WDRNN prediction. (<b>D</b>) M-WDRNN point-wise error. (<b>E</b>) exact solution (<a href="#FD7-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">7</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Top panel: (<b>A</b>) PINN loss values. (<b>B</b>) PINN point-wise error. (<b>C</b>) PINN predicted solution. (<b>D</b>) Exact solution (<a href="#FD9-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">9</a>). Bottom panel: (<b>E</b>) M-WDRNN point-wise error. (<b>F</b>) M-WDRNN predicted solution. (<b>G</b>) Loss values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Top panel: (<b>A</b>) PINN point-wise error. (<b>B</b>) PINN prediction. Bottom panel: (<b>C</b>) M-WDRNN point-wise error. (<b>D</b>) M-WDRNN prediction. (<b>E</b>) Exact solution (<a href="#FD10-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">10</a>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>The inverse problem of the (1+1) dimensional advection diffusion Equation (<a href="#FD10-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">10</a>). (<b>A</b>) M-WDRNN point wise-error. (<b>B</b>) PINN point wise-error. (<b>C</b>) Exact solution (<a href="#FD10-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">10</a>), (<b>D</b>) Loss values. (<b>E</b>) Diffusion coefficient <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>κ</mi> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Top panel: (<b>A</b>) M-WDRNN loss values. (<b>B</b>) M-WDRNN point-wise error. (<b>C</b>) M-WDRNN predicted solution, (<b>D</b>) Exact solution (<a href="#FD12-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">12</a>). Bottom panel: (<b>E</b>) PINN point-wise error. (<b>F</b>) PINN predicted solution. (<b>G</b>) PINN loss values.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>The inverse problem of the Helmholtz Equation (<a href="#FD12-axioms-12-00750" class="html-disp-formula">12</a>). (<b>A</b>) Loss values. (<b>B</b>) Predicted solution. (<b>C</b>) Point-wise error. (<b>D</b>) Diffusion coefficient <span class="html-italic">D</span>.</p>
Full article ">
14 pages, 294 KiB  
Article
Stability of Stochastic Partial Differential Equations
by Allaberen Ashyralyev and Ülker Okur
Axioms 2023, 12(7), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070718 - 24 Jul 2023
Viewed by 948
Abstract
In this paper, we study the stability of the stochastic parabolic differential equation with dependent coefficients. We consider the stability of an abstract Cauchy problem for the solution of certain stochastic parabolic differential equations in a Hilbert space. For the solution of the [...] Read more.
In this paper, we study the stability of the stochastic parabolic differential equation with dependent coefficients. We consider the stability of an abstract Cauchy problem for the solution of certain stochastic parabolic differential equations in a Hilbert space. For the solution of the initial-boundary value problems (IBVPs), we obtain the stability estimates for stochastic parabolic equations with dependent coefficients in specific applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
29 pages, 4347 KiB  
Article
Higher-Order Blended Compact Difference Scheme on Nonuniform Grids for the 3D Steady Convection-Diffusion Equation
by Tingfu Ma, Bin Lan, Yongbin Ge and Lili Wu
Axioms 2023, 12(7), 651; https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms12070651 - 29 Jun 2023
Viewed by 849
Abstract
This paper proposes a higher-order blended compact difference (BCD) scheme on nonuniform grids for solving the three-dimensional (3D) convection–diffusion equation with variable coefficients. The BCD scheme has fifth- to sixth-order accuracy and considers the first and second derivatives of the unknown function as [...] Read more.
This paper proposes a higher-order blended compact difference (BCD) scheme on nonuniform grids for solving the three-dimensional (3D) convection–diffusion equation with variable coefficients. The BCD scheme has fifth- to sixth-order accuracy and considers the first and second derivatives of the unknown function as unknowns as well. Unlike other schemes that require grid transformation, the BCD scheme does not require any grid transformation and is simple and flexible in grid subdivisions. Concurrently, the corresponding high-order boundary schemes of the first and second derivatives have also been constructed. We tested the BCD scheme on three problems that involve convection-dominated and boundary-layer features. The numerical results show that the BCD scheme has good adaptability and high resolution on nonuniform grids. It outperforms the BCD scheme on uniform grids and the high-order compact scheme on nonuniform grids in the literature in terms of accuracy and resolution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Labeling of the 19 grid points on nonuniform grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Grid-point discretization for a left boundary on non-uniform grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>The number results for Problem 1 on Gird 32<sup>3</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm261"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm168"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (for uniform grid) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm169"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8163</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (for nonuniform grid): (<bold>a</bold>) Stencil of grids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm170"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>); (<bold>b</bold>) Exact solution, as well as the numerical solutions of (<bold>c</bold>) Uniform grids; and (<bold>d</bold>) Nonuniform grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>When <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm262"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>a</bold>) The absolute error on uniform grids in the plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm171"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>, (<bold>b</bold>) The absolute error on nonuniform grids in the plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm172"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8163</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm173"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>) for Problem 1 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm174"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>When <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm263"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm194"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5625</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (<bold>a</bold>) Stencil of the nonuniform grids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm195"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>); (<bold>b</bold>) The exact solution on nonuniform grids; (<bold>c</bold>) The absolute error on uniform grids, (<bold>d</bold>) The maximum absolute error on nonuniform grids for Problem 2 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm196"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Results for Problem 3: when <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm264"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm220"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (for uniform grids) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm221"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8163</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (for nonuniform grids): (<bold>a</bold>) Stencil of grids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm222"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>); (<bold>b</bold>) Exact solution, the absolute errors of (<bold>c</bold>) Uniform grids; (<bold>d</bold>) Nonuniform grids with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm223"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> grids.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6 Cont.
<p>Results for Problem 3: when <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm264"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> in the plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm220"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (for uniform grids) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm221"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8163</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> (for nonuniform grids): (<bold>a</bold>) Stencil of grids (<inline-formula><mml:math id="mm222"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:mi>λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula>); (<bold>b</bold>) Exact solution, the absolute errors of (<bold>c</bold>) Uniform grids; (<bold>d</bold>) Nonuniform grids with <inline-formula><mml:math id="mm223"><mml:semantics><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mn>32</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:semantics></mml:math></inline-formula> grids.</p>
Full article ">
15 pages, 683 KiB  
Article
Finite Element Error Analysis of a Viscoelastic Timoshenko Beam with Thermodiffusion Effects
by Jacobo G. Baldonedo, José R. Fernández, Abraham Segade and Sofía Suárez
Mathematics 2023, 11(13), 2900; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11132900 - 28 Jun 2023
Viewed by 923
Abstract
In this paper, a thermomechanical problem involving a viscoelastic Timoshenko beam is analyzed from a numerical point of view. The so-called thermodiffusion effects are also included in the model. The problem is written as a linear system composed of two second-order-in-time partial differential [...] Read more.
In this paper, a thermomechanical problem involving a viscoelastic Timoshenko beam is analyzed from a numerical point of view. The so-called thermodiffusion effects are also included in the model. The problem is written as a linear system composed of two second-order-in-time partial differential equations for the transverse displacement and the rotational movement, and two first-order-in-time partial differential equations for the temperature and the chemical potential. The corresponding variational formulation leads to a coupled system of first-order linear variational equations written in terms of the transverse velocity, the rotation speed, the temperature and the chemical potential. The existence and uniqueness of solutions, as well as the energy decay property, are stated. Then, we focus on the numerical approximation of this weak problem by using the implicit Euler scheme to discretize the time derivatives and the classical finite element method to approximate the spatial variable. A discrete stability property and some a priori error estimates are shown, from which we can conclude the linear convergence of the approximations under suitable additional regularity conditions. Finally, some numerical simulations are performed to demonstrate the accuracy of the scheme, the behavior of the discrete energy decay and the dependence of the solution with respect to some parameters. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Linear convergence of the algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Energy decay for the fully viscoelastic case.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Energy decay for the partially viscoelastic I model.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Energy decay for the partially viscoelastic II model.</p>
Full article ">
12 pages, 2771 KiB  
Article
Solve High-Dimensional Reflected Partial Differential Equations by Neural Network Method
by Xiaowen Shi, Xiangyu Zhang, Renwu Tang and Juan Yang
Math. Comput. Appl. 2023, 28(4), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28040079 - 24 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1578
Abstract
Reflected partial differential equations (PDEs) have important applications in financial mathematics, stochastic control, physics, and engineering. This paper aims to present a numerical method for solving high-dimensional reflected PDEs. In fact, overcoming the “dimensional curse” and approximating the reflection term are challenges. Some [...] Read more.
Reflected partial differential equations (PDEs) have important applications in financial mathematics, stochastic control, physics, and engineering. This paper aims to present a numerical method for solving high-dimensional reflected PDEs. In fact, overcoming the “dimensional curse” and approximating the reflection term are challenges. Some numerical algorithms based on neural networks developed recently fail in solving high-dimensional reflected PDEs. To solve these problems, firstly, the reflected PDEs are transformed into reflected backward stochastic differential equations (BSDEs) using the reflected Feyman–Kac formula. Secondly, the reflection term of the reflected BSDEs is approximated using the penalization method. Next, the BSDEs are discretized using a strategy that combines Euler and Crank–Nicolson schemes. Finally, a deep neural network model is employed to simulate the solution of the BSDEs. The effectiveness of the proposed method is tested by two numerical experiments, and the model shows high stability and accuracy in solving reflected PDEs of up to 100 dimensions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Illustration of the neural network framework for solving obstacle problems for PDEs. There are <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> sub-networks in total and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> hidden layers in each sub-network. Therefore, there exist <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>)</mo> <mo>(</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> layers in the whole network with parameters that need to be optimized. We divide the time internal <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>[</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">T</mi> <mo>]</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> for intervals and each column for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </msub> <mo>,</mo> <mo>⋯</mo> <mo>,</mo> <msub> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">t</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="normal">N</mi> <mo>−</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Loss value of different dimensions for Deep BSDE algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Loss value of different dimensions for Deep C-N algorithm.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Loss values for 10 times based on Deep C-N algorithm.</p>
Full article ">
18 pages, 2778 KiB  
Article
Urban Heat Island Dynamics in an Urban–Rural Domain with Variable Porosity: Numerical Methodology and Simulation
by Néstor García-Chan, Juan A. Licea-Salazar and Luis G. Gutierrez-Ibarra
Mathematics 2023, 11(5), 1140; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051140 - 24 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1909
Abstract
Heat transfer and fluid dynamics modeling in porous media is a widely explored topic in physics and applied mathematics, and it involves advanced numerical methods to address its non-linear nature. One interesting application has been the urban-heat-island (UHI) numerical simulation. The UHI is [...] Read more.
Heat transfer and fluid dynamics modeling in porous media is a widely explored topic in physics and applied mathematics, and it involves advanced numerical methods to address its non-linear nature. One interesting application has been the urban-heat-island (UHI) numerical simulation. The UHI is a negative consequence of the increasing urbanization in cities, which is defined as the presence of warm temperatures inside the urban canopy in contrast to the colder surroundings. Furthermore, an interesting phenomena occurs within a UHI context when the city transitions from a heat island to a cold island, matching the increases and decreases of solar radiation over the span of a day, as well as the decrease in the UHI intensity as a result of wind action. The numerical study in this paper had, as its main goal, to reproduce this phenomenon. Therefore, the key elements proposed in this work were the following: A 2D horizontal urban–rural domain that had a variable porosity with a Gaussian distribution centered in the city center. A non-stationary Darcy–Forchheimer–Brinkman model to simulate the flow in porous media, combined with an air–soil heat transport model linked by a balancing equation for the surface energy that includes the evapotranspiration of plants. In regards to the numerical resolution of the model, a classical numerical methodology based on the finite elements of Lagrange P1 type combined with explicit and implicit time-marching schemes have been effective for high-quality numerical simulations. Several numerical tests were performed on a domain inspired by the metropolitan region of Guadalajara (Mexico), in which not only the temperature inversion was reproduced but also the simulation of the UHI transition by strong wind gusts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Heat-transfer model: the urban–rural domain <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Ω</mo> </semantics></math> (bottom) is a sub-set of <math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> with an urban area, represented as a rectangle (gray); a rural area (green); the soil below (brown); inlet–outlet boundary segments; and inlet wind direction (blue arrow). Based on the horizontal section of the domain (magenta sector), the vertical distribution of the three temperatures <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> is shown (top left) in congruence with the vertical interchange thermal resistances <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>a</mi> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>r</mi> <mrow> <mi>s</mi> <mi>h</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> for air and soil, respectively (top right). Both layer thicknesses, <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> for air and <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>d</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> for soil, are much smaller when compared with the horizontal scale. Finally, the resistance diagram (top right) is formulated based on Figure 6 in [<a href="#B23-mathematics-11-01140" class="html-bibr">23</a>].</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Study area idealization, mesh, and 24 h solar radiation. (<b>a</b>) Satellite photograph of the metropolitan region of Guadalajara with more of 40 km<math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mrow/> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </semantics></math> (Google-Earth, 2023). Here, we denoted the boundaries and hills (idealized as rectangles) of the domain <math display="inline"><semantics> <mo>Ω</mo> </semantics></math> with a red line. (<b>b</b>) Triangular mesh <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>τ</mi> <mi>h</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, inlet boundary <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mo>Γ</mo> <mrow> <mi>i</mi> <mi>n</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> (green), outlet boundary <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mo>Γ</mo> <mrow> <mi>o</mi> <mi>u</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </semantics></math> (magenta), hills walls <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mo>Γ</mo> <mi>w</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> (red), and the urban-limit layout (black) as a circumference of radius <span class="html-italic">r</span>. The black arrow shows the inlet wind direction. (<b>c</b>) Typical global day-long solar radiation <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>R</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> <mrow> <mo>(</mo> <mi>t</mi> <mo>)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </semantics></math> with maximum values at midday and almost zero on either side.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Examples of parameter distribution on the urban–rural domain and the urban–limit layout. (<b>a</b>) Gaussian distribution of the porosity <math display="inline"><semantics> <mi>ϵ</mi> </semantics></math> with lower values at the city center and with higher values in the rural surroundings. (<b>b</b>) For dimensionless parameters such as soil emissivity <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>e</mi> <mi>s</mi> </msub> </semantics></math>, a simple radial distribution with only two values, corresponding to urban and rural, was assigned to each mesh node.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Time evolution of the air temperatures during a 24 h interval. We used the following times <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mn>8</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mn>12</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> <mn>16</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mspace width="0.166667em"/> </mrow> </semantics></math> and 20 h as a sample to illustrate the obtained results. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> at 8 h. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> at 10 h. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> at 12 h. (<b>d</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> at 14 h. (<b>e</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> at 16 h. (<b>f</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> at 20 h.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>The reference wind field used in the experiment was constant and computed from the momentum equation. (<b>a</b>) Wind field. (<b>b</b>) Norm of the wind field <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mo>∥</mo> <mi mathvariant="bold">u</mi> <mo>∥</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>It was clear that the streamline diffusion stabilizer minimized the spurious oscillation without notable changes in the temperatures. (<b>a</b>) Un-stabilized solution (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>). (<b>b</b>) Stabilized solution (<math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ζ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>25</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>).</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Wind effect on the UHI. As expected, the wind transported the warmer air from urban to rural areas. With enough intensity, the wind could be a factor in cold downwind air temperatures. (<b>a</b>) Reference wind <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) Augmented reference wind <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>2</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>c</b>) Augmented reference wind <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>3</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>d</b>) Augmented reference wind <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>η</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>4</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Dynamics of the transport of warmer mass air during wind gusts. (<b>a</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> before wind blows at 13 h. (<b>b</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> an in-between time period of blowing wind. (<b>c</b>) <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>θ</mi> <mi>a</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> final state at 17 h.</p>
Full article ">
25 pages, 6144 KiB  
Article
Finite Difference Method to Evaluate the Characteristics of Optically Dense Gray Nanofluid Heat Transfer around the Surface of a Sphere and in the Plume Region
by Muhammad Ashraf, Anwar Khan, Amir Abbas, Abid Hussanan, Kaouther Ghachem, Chemseddine Maatki and Lioua Kolsi
Mathematics 2023, 11(4), 908; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11040908 - 10 Feb 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 1547
Abstract
The current research study is focusing on the investigation of the physical effects of thermal radiation on heat and mass transfer of a nanofluid located around a sphere. The configuration is investigated by solving the partial differential equations governing the phenomenon. By using [...] Read more.
The current research study is focusing on the investigation of the physical effects of thermal radiation on heat and mass transfer of a nanofluid located around a sphere. The configuration is investigated by solving the partial differential equations governing the phenomenon. By using suitable non-dimensional variables, the governing set of partial differential equations is transformed into a dimensionless form. For numerical simulation, the attained set of dimensionless partial differential equations is discretized by using the finite difference method. The effects of the governing parameters, such as the Brownian motion parameter, the thermophoresis parameter, the radiation parameter, the Prandtl number, and the Schmidt number on the velocity field, temperature distribution, and mass concentration, are presented graphically. Moreover, the impacts of these physical parameters on the skin friction coefficient, the Nusselt number, and the Sherwood number are displayed in the form of tables. Numerical outcomes reflect that the effects of the radiation parameter, thermophoresis parameter, and the Brownian motion parameter intensify the profiles of velocity, temperature, and concentration at different circumferential positions on the sphere. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Coordinate system and flow configuration.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Outcomes of radiation parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on velocity distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math></p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Outcomes of radiation parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on temperature distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>Outcomes of radiation parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on mass concentration <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Outcomes of thermophoresis parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on velocity distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when N = 0.5, Nb = 1.5, Pr = 7.0, and Sc = 10.0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Outcomes of thermophoresis parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on temperature distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when N = 0.5, Nb = 1.5, Pr = 7.0, and Sc = 10.0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>Outcomes of thermophoresis parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on mass concentration <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when N = 0.5, Nb = 1.5, Pr = 7.0, and Sc = 10.0.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>Outcomes of Brownian motion parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on velocity distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math></p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Outcomes of Brownian motion parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on temperature distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math></p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Outcomes of Brownian motion parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>b</mi> </mrow> </msub> </mrow> </semantics></math> on mass concentration <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math></p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Outcomes of Schmidt number <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on mass concentration <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> = 1.5, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math></p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Outcomes of radiation parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on velocity distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math>, when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 13
<p>Outcomes of radiation parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on temperature distribution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 14
<p>Outcomes of radiation parameter <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> on mass concentration <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>ϕ</mi> </mrow> </semantics></math> when <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>N</mi> <mi>b</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>N</mi> <mi>t</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> <mo>,</mo> <mi>P</mi> <mi>r</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>7.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>, and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>S</mi> <mi>c</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>10.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 2503 KiB  
Article
A Finite Volume Method to Solve the Ill-Posed Elliptic Problems
by Ying Sheng and Tie Zhang
Mathematics 2022, 10(22), 4220; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224220 - 11 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1252
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a finite volume element method of primal-dual type to solve the ill-posed elliptic problem, that is, the elliptic problem with lacking or overlapping boundary value condition. We first establish the primal-dual finite volume element scheme by introducing the [...] Read more.
In this paper, we propose a finite volume element method of primal-dual type to solve the ill-posed elliptic problem, that is, the elliptic problem with lacking or overlapping boundary value condition. We first establish the primal-dual finite volume element scheme by introducing the Lagrange multiplier λ and prove the well-posedness of the discrete scheme. Then, the error estimations of the finite volume solution are derived under some proper norms including the H1-norm. Numerical experiments are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed finite volume element method at last. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>Dual element <math display="inline"><semantics> <msubsup> <mi>K</mi> <mi>P</mi> <mo>*</mo> </msubsup> </semantics></math> at node <span class="html-italic">P</span>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>B.C. I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>B.C. II.</p>
Full article ">Figure 4
<p>B.C. III.</p>
Full article ">Figure 5
<p>Exact solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mi>y</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 6
<p>Numerical solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mi>h</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> of B.C. I.</p>
Full article ">Figure 7
<p>B.C. IV.</p>
Full article ">Figure 8
<p>B.C. V.</p>
Full article ">Figure 9
<p>Exact solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <mi>y</mi> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 10
<p>Numerical solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mi>h</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> of B.C. V.</p>
Full article ">Figure 11
<p>Exact solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>u</mi> <mo>=</mo> <msup> <mi>x</mi> <mn>2</mn> </msup> <mo>+</mo> <msup> <mi>e</mi> <mi>y</mi> </msup> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 12
<p>Numerical solution <math display="inline"><semantics> <msub> <mi>u</mi> <mi>h</mi> </msub> </semantics></math> of B.C. V.</p>
Full article ">
13 pages, 1288 KiB  
Article
An Unchanged Basis Function and Preserving Accuracy Crank–Nicolson Finite Element Reduced-Dimension Method for Symmetric Tempered Fractional Diffusion Equation
by Xiaoyong Yang and Zhendong Luo
Mathematics 2022, 10(19), 3630; https://doi.org/10.3390/math10193630 - 4 Oct 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1233
Abstract
We herein mainly employ a proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) to study the reduced dimension of unknown solution coefficient vectors in the Crank–Nicolson finite element (FE) (CNFE) method for the symmetric tempered fractional diffusion equation so that we can build the reduced-dimension recursive CNFE [...] Read more.
We herein mainly employ a proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) to study the reduced dimension of unknown solution coefficient vectors in the Crank–Nicolson finite element (FE) (CNFE) method for the symmetric tempered fractional diffusion equation so that we can build the reduced-dimension recursive CNFE (RDRCNFE) method. In this case, the RDRCNFE method keeps the same basic functions and accuracy as the CNFE method. Especially, we adopt the matrix analysis to discuss the stability and convergence of RDRCNFE solutions, resulting in the very laconic theoretical analysis. We also use some numerical simulations to confirm the correctness of theoretical results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>(<b>a</b>) The RDRCNFE solutions for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) The CNFE solutions for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>(<b>a</b>) The RDRCNFE solutions for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) The CNFE solutions for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.5</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>(<b>a</b>) The RDRCNFE solutions for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>. (<b>b</b>) The CNFE solutions for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>θ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.9</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> and <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.0</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
17 pages, 4364 KiB  
Article
A Modular Grad-Div Stabilization Method for Time-Dependent Thermally Coupled MHD Equations
by Xianzhu Li and Haiyan Su
Entropy 2022, 24(10), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/e24101336 - 22 Sep 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1579
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a fully discrete modular grad-div stabilization algorithm for time-dependent thermally coupled magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations. The main idea of the proposed algorithm is to add an extra minimally intrusive module to penalize the divergence errors of velocity and improve [...] Read more.
In this paper, we consider a fully discrete modular grad-div stabilization algorithm for time-dependent thermally coupled magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations. The main idea of the proposed algorithm is to add an extra minimally intrusive module to penalize the divergence errors of velocity and improve the computational efficiency for increasing values of the Reynolds number and grad-div stabilization parameters. In addition, we provide the unconditional stability and optimal convergence analysis of this algorithm. Finally, several numerical experiments are performed and further indicated these advantages over the algorithm without grad-div stabilization. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Figure 1
<p>No-Stab method: streamlines of velocity and magnetic, isotherms of temperature for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s (<b>a</b>), 0.5 s (<b>b</b>), 1 s (<b>c</b>) with Reynolds number <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 2
<p>Modular grad-div stabilization method: streamlines of velocity and magnetic, isotherms of temperature for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s (<b>a</b>), 0.5 s (<b>b</b>), 1 s (<b>c</b>) with Reynolds number <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">Figure 3
<p>Modular grad-div stabilization method: streamlines of velocity and magnetic, isotherms of temperature for <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>T</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0.1</mn> </mrow> </semantics></math> s (<b>a</b>), 1 s (<b>b</b>), 6 s (<b>c</b>) with Reynolds number <math display="inline"><semantics> <mrow> <mi>R</mi> <mi>e</mi> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </semantics></math><math display="inline"><semantics> <msup> <mn>10</mn> <mn>6</mn> </msup> </semantics></math>.</p>
Full article ">
Back to TopTop